DOCSLIB.ORG

Task 1 - Implementation and Enforcement Capacities in Croatia for the Environmental Acquis Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Task 1 - Implementation and Enforcement Capacities in Croatia for the Environmental Acquis Final Report ECOLAS N.V. IEEP Lange Nie uwstraat 43 Ave des Gaulois 18 2000 Antwerpen 1040 Brussels Belgium Belgium Tel: +32 3 233 07 03 Tel: + 32 (0) 2 738 74 74 Fax: +32 3 233 81 20 Fax: + 32 (0) 2 732 40 04 http://www.Ecolas.be http://www.ieep.org.u k Task 1 - Implementation and Enforcement Capacities in Croatia for the environmental acquis Final Report The European Commission – DG Environment 04/08853/AL May 2005 ECOLAS / IEEP / Elektroprojekt Content 04/08853 – Croatia – Implementation and Enforcement Capacities for the environmental acquis CONTENT Content .......................................................................................................................................i Abbreviations .............................................................................................................................v List of figures ............................................................................................................................ vi List of tables ............................................................................................................................ vii Executive summary.................................................................................................................... I 1 Background and Objectives ................................................................................................1 1.1 Background ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 1 1.2 Objectives ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 2 2 implementation & enforcement process in Cro atia ............................................................3 2.1 The regulatory Cycle ................................ ................................ ................................ ............ 3 2.2 Key organisations ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 5 2.2.1 Political Structure and Policy Development ................................ ................................ ... 5 2.2.2 Ministry of Environme ntal Protection, Physical Planning and Construction (MEPPPC) ....... 5 2.2.3 Ministry of Culture ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 10 2.2.4 Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management (MAFWM) ............................. 12 2. 2.5 Other Ministries ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 13 2.2.6 Other state administration bodies ................................ ................................ .............. 14 2.2.7 Regional and Local Self-Government ................................ ................................ .......... 20 2.2.8 Regional Authorities ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 21 2.2.9 Local Authorities ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 22 2.2.10 Overview of responsibilities for Implementation and Enforcement in Croatia................. 25 2.3 Legislative Development and Strategic Planning ................................ ................................ ... 31 2.4 Permitting ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 34 2.4.1 Permitting authorities ................................ ................................ ................................ 34 2.4.2 Water permits ................................ ................................ ................................ .......... 36 2.5 Monitoring ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 37 2.5.1 Monitoring responsibilities ................................ ................................ ......................... 37 2.5.2 Implementation of the Environmental Protection Information System (EPIS) ................ 38 2.5.3 Public access to monitoring data ................................ ................................ ................ 38 2.6 Inspection/Enforcement ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 39 2.6.1 Air and waste sector: MEPPPC ................................ ................................ ................... 39 2.6.2 Water sector: MAFWM -Water Directorate, Croatian Waters and local administrations.... 41 2.6.3 Nature protection: Ministry of Culture - Direc torate for Nature Protection and public institutes on regional and local level for nature protection ................................ ............................ 42 2.7 Reporting ................................ ................................ ................................ .......................... 42 2.7.1 National level ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 42 2.7.2 Regional level ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 43 2.7.3 Local level ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 43 2.8 ROLE OF REGIONAL AND LOCAL AUTHORITIES ................................ ................................ ................ 44 2.8.1 Regional / County level ................................ ................................ ............................. 44 2.8.2 Local self -Government ................................ ................................ .............................. 46 2.9 Economic/Financial Framework ................................ ................................ ........................... 47 i ECOLAS / IEEP / Elektroprojekt Content 04/08853 – Croatia – Implementation and Enforcement Capacities for the environmental acquis 2.9.1 General ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 47 2.9.2 Funding ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 48 2.10 WIDER TECHNICAL ISSUES ................................ ................................ ................................ 50 2.10.1 Staff of authorities ................................ ................................ ................................ .... 50 2.10.2 Laboratories ................................ ................................ ................................ ............. 51 2.10.3 Budget allocated for R&D programmes to support environmental protection ................ 52 2.10.4 Environmental advice procedure s ................................ ................................ .............. 52 2.11 WIDER INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES ................................ ................................ ......................... 53 2.11.1 Complexity of the environmental protection system ................................ .................... 53 2.11.2 Public awareness ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 53 2.11.3 En vironmental NGOs ................................ ................................ ................................ 54 3 Implementation & enforcement at sector /Directive level ..............................................57 3.1 The Assessment Process................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 57 3.2 Horizontal Legislation ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 63 3.3 Air Quality ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 64 3.3.1 Legislation ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 64 3.3.2 Institutional framework ................................ ................................ ............................. 66 3.3.3 Strategy ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 67 3.3.4 Monitoring ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 68 3.4 Water ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ 69 3.4.1 Legislation ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 69 3.4.2 Institutional framework ................................ ................................ ............................. 70 3.4.3 Implementation of the polluter pays principle in the water sector ................................ 71 3.4.4 Water quality monitoring system ................................ ................................ ............... 72 3.4.5 Projects ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 73 3.5 Waste Management ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 73 3.5.1 Legislation ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 73 3.5.2 Institutional
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anticorruption Policy in Croatia: Benchmark for Eu
    1 Damir Grubiša Anti-Corruption Policy in Croatia: a Benchmark for EU Accession In 1998, the European Commission concluded in its evaluation of the central and east European countries' requests for EU membership in the context of the preparation for Agenda 2000 that the fight against political corruption in these countries needed to be upgraded. The Commission's report on the progress of each candidate country can be summed up as follows: "The efforts undertaken by candidate countries are not always adequate to the entity of the problem itself. Although some of these countries initiate new programmes for the control and prevention of corruption, it is too early for a judgment on the efficiency of such measures. A lack of determination can be seen in confronting this problem and in rooting out corruption in the greatest part of the candidate countries". Similar evaluations were repeated in subsequent reports on the progress of candidate countries from central and east Europe. Accordingly, it was concluded in 2001 that political corruption is a serious problem in five out of ten countries of that region: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Slovakia, and a constant problem in three more countries: Hungary, Lithuania and Latvia. The Commission refrained from expressing critical remarks only in the case of two countries – Estonia and Slovenia. Up to 2002, only eight out of fifteen member states ratified the basic instrument that the EU had adopted against corruption, namely the EU Convention on the Safeguarding of Economic Interests of the European Communities. Some of the founding members of the European Community were rated as countries with a "high level of corruption" – Germany, France and, specifically, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Election of Judges to the European Court of Human Rights (In Accordance with Article 22 of the European Convention on Human Rights)
    Doc. 13027 20 September 2012 Election of judges to the European Court of Human Rights (in accordance with Article 22 of the European Convention on Human Rights) List and curricula vitae of candidates submitted by the Governments of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the Republic of Moldova and the Russian Federation F – 67075 Strasbourg Cedex | [email protected] | Tel: +33 3 88 41 2000 | Fax: +33 3 88 41 2733 Doc. 13027 Contents Page List and curricula vitae of candidates submitted by the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina ...... 3 Jasminka DŽUMHUR ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Faris VEHABOVI Ć.......................................................................................................................................... 15 Dragomir VUKOJE.......................................................................................................................................... 19 Curricula vitae of candidates submitted by the Government of Croatia ................................................ 25 Vesna ALABURI Ć........................................................................................................................................... 33 Vesna CRNI Ć-GROTI Ć.................................................................................................................................. 37 Ksenija TURKOVI Ć .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Assessment of the ESF Support to Public Administration’ (PAPA)
    ‘Strengthening the capacity of public authorities for the implementation of the Act on the Right of Access to Information’ Case study of a Croatian ESF project under the study ‘Progress Assessment of the ESF Support to Public Administration’ (PAPA) Written by Dr Ivan Koprić April 2019 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Directorate F — Investment Unit F1: ESF and FEAD Policy and Legislation Contact: DG EMPL F1 E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Implemented by PPMI PPMI Group Gedimino av. 50 LT-01110 Vilnius, Lithuania www.ppmi.lt Contact: Dr Vitalis Nakrošis, thematic expert (Programme Manager at PPMI) [email protected] Case study written by country expert Dr Ivan Koprić Specific contract No VC/2018/0771 under the Multiple Framework Contract No VC/2017/0376 for the provision of services related to the implementation of Better Regulation Guidelines EUROPEAN COMMISSION ‘Strengthening the capacity of public authorities for the implementation of the Act on the Right of Access to Information’ Case study of a Croatian ESF project under the study ‘Progress Assessment of ESF Support to Public Administration’ (PAPA) Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion 2020 EN Study ‘Progress Assessment of the ESF Support to Public Administration’ (PAPA) Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission; however, it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing the 2009 – 2010 Presidential Elections in Croatia: Conflicting Interpretations of Campaign Finance Laws**
    Zbornik PFZ, 61, (1) 41-64 (2011) 41 FinAnCing tHe 2009 – 2010 PReSidentiAL eLeCtionS in CRoAtiA: ConFLiCting inteRPRetAtionS oF CAmPAign FinAnCe LAWS** Professor Robert Podolnjak, Ph. D.* UDK: 342.849.2(497.5) 324.511(497.5) Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: kolovoz 2010. The author discusses two fundamental problems relating to the funding of election campaigns in the recent presidential election in Croatia. The first pro- blem derives from the incongruence of two election campaign financing acts in Croatia – the 2004 Act on Financing the Election Campaign for the Election of the President of the Republic of Croatia and the 2007 Act on the Financing of Political Parties, Independent Lists and Candidates. The latter and the more important problem in funding the latest presidential election campaign was that the competent state bodies, authorized to implement the regulations dealing with the funding of the election campaign, were deeply divided on the question which of the two acts is relevant in regulating specific issues. The differences in the way the State Electoral Commission, the Constitutional Court, the State Audit Office and the Ministry of Administration interpreted legal regulations precluded the effective sanctioning of offences in the latest presidential election campaign in Croatia. Key words: presidential elections, Croatia, funding of the election campaign According to the final report of the OSCE mission in Croatia, the latest pre- sidential elections in Croatia (first round in December 2009 and run-off in Ja- nuary 2010), generally speaking, fulfilled the international electoral standards. However, one of the strongest reservations expressed was about the regulation of the electoral campaign financing.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Enlargement – Western Enlargement Cultural Encounters in the European Economy and Society After the Accession
    EU RESEARCH ON SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES Eastern Enlargement - Western Enlargement Cultural Encounters in the European Economy And Society after the Accession DIOSCURI project THE ART STATE OF EUR 21952 Interested in European research? RTD info is our quarterly magazine keeping you in touch with main developments (results, programmes, events, etc). It is available in English, French and German. A free sample copy or free subscription can be obtained from: European Commission Directorate-General for Research Information and Communication Unit B-1049 Brussels Fax : (32-2) 29-58220 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/rtdinfo/index_en. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research Directorate K – Knowledge-based economy and society E-mail: [email protected] DIOSCURI Research Project Eastern Enlargement – Western Enlargement Cultural Encounters in the European Economy and Society after the Accession State of the Art Project CIT2-CT-2004-506024 Funded under Priority 7: Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge-based Society DG Research Report issued in October 2005 Coordinator of project : Central European University, Budapest Foundation, Center for Policy Studies Budapest, Hungary, Violetta ZENTAI [email protected] Partners : Institüt für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen, Wien, Austria, Janos Kovacs Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Praha,, Czech Republic, Jiri Vecernik Institute of Public Affairs, Warsaw, Poland, Jacek Kochanowicz Univerza v Ljubljana, Slovenia,
    [Show full text]
  • Pragmatic Peace the UNTAES Peacekeeping Mission As Example for Peaceful Reintegration of Occupied Multiethnic Territories
    ema Awarded Theses 2017/2018 Sandra Kasunić Pragmatic Peace The UNTAES Peacekeeping Mission as Example for Peaceful Reintegration of Occupied Multiethnic Territories ema, The European Master’s Programme in Human Rights and Democratisation SANDRA KASUNI PRAGMATIC PEACE:ć THE UNTAES PEACEKEEPING MISSION AS AN EXAMPLE FOR PEACEFUL REINTEGRATION OF OCCUPIED MULTIETHNIC TERRITORIES SANDRA KASUNI ć FOREWORD The European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation (EMA) is a one-year intensive programme launched in 1997 as a joint initiative of universities in all EU Member States with support from the European Commission. Based on an action- and policy-oriented approach to learning, it combines legal, political, historical, anthropological, and philosophical perspectives on the study of human rights and democracy with targeted skill-building activities. The aim from the outset was to prepare young professionals to respond to the requirements and challenges of work in international organisations, field operations, governmental and non-governmental bodies, and academia. As a measure of its success, EMA has served as a model of inspiration for the establishment of six other EU-sponsored regional master’s programmes in the area of human rights and democratisation in different parts of the world. These programmes cooperate closely in the framework of the Global Campus of Human Rights, which is based in Venice, Italy. 90 students are admitted to the EMA programme each year. During the first semester in Venice, students have the opportunity to meet and learn from leading academics, experts and representatives of international and non-governmental organisations. During the second semester, they relocate to one of the 41 participating universities to follow additional courses in an area of specialisation of their own choice and to conduct research under the supervision of the resident EMA Director or other academic staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia's Captured Places
    CROATIA’S CAPTURED PLACES Research report Case Studies on the Quality of Local Governance in Croatia CROATIA’S CAPTURED PLACES Research report Case Studies on the Quality of Local Governance in Croatia Authors: Dražen Hoffmann, Nives Miošić-Lisjak, Duje Prkut, Dragan Zelić - GONG Paul Stubbs, PhD - The Institute of Economics, Zagreb Berto Šalaj, PhD - Faculty of Political Science, Zagreb University Siniša Zrinščak, PhD - Faculty of Law, Zagreb University Zagreb, February 2017. Publisher: GONG For the publisher: Jelena Berković Reviewers: Tea Škokić, PhD, Institute for Ethnology and Folklore Research, Zagreb Eric Gordy, PhD, School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London Photography author: Jadran Boban ISBN: 978-953-7960-06-3 Table of Contents 0. Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 9 2. Key Concepts 12 2.1 Local State 13 2.2 State Capture 14 2.3 Informal practices 15 2.4 Power networks 16 3. Methodology 18 4. Local State Capture in Croatian Practice 24 4.1 Elements of the Institutional and Legal Frameworks 25 The County of Istria 27 1. Political Context in the County of Istria 28 2. Formal Mechanism of Local State Capture in the County of Istria 30 3. Informal Mechanisms of Local State Capture in the County of Istria 36 4. Ensuring Voter Support in the County of Istria 39 5. Factors Contributing to IDS’ Continuous Governance in the County of Istria 41 The City of Zagreb 48 1. Political Context in the City of Zagreb 49 2. Formal Mechanisms of Local State Capture in the City of Zagreb 51 3. Informal Mechanisms of Local State Capture in the City of Zagreb 60 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2014
    an nu al report 2014. March, 2015 an nu al report 2014. 2 Contents foreword 4 1.electoral system 4 Electoral law changes 5 Law on Referenda – an opportunity to improve or to weaken democracy? 8 Presidential elections – reminder of the weak links of the electoral process 9 Once more, low interest for the EP elections 10 International experiences 11 2.good governance 12 Public administration reform 13 Anticorruption Policy and Conflict of Interests 13 Access to information 14 LOTUS 16 Open Government Partnership 17 Participatory budgeting: “Watch out, the budget! Pazin” 18 On media 19 Public interest advocacy 20 3.active citizens and civil society 22 Platform 112: the Government has opted for status quo with respect to rule of law 23 SVI MI – A Croatia for us all 24 Educating citizens instead of subjects 26 In search of “a good economy” 28 4.croatia and the european union 30 Social Europe – a strategic investment, not an expense! 31 Support to the inclusion of the civil society in the EU enlargement process 32 The voice of the Croatian civil society in the EU 32 5.organisational development 34 GONG’s presence in the media 35 Financial and administrative management 35 6.financial report36 Balance sheet 37 Income and expenditure account 37 Expenditure per groups 38 Grant agreements income 39 3 introduction The admission of Croatia into the European Union in July, 2013 was perceived by many citizens as a starting position which will enable, for citizens and politicians, the development of all potentials including democratic ones. The more sceptical among them were warning, not without insight into the processes inside the European Union since the signing of the Maastricht Treaty, that it might not be like that after all.
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Is an International Legal Instrument of the United Nations, Dating from 1966 (Hereinafter: “The Covenant”)
    UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant Distr. on civil and GENERAL political rights CCPR/C/HRV/2 2 December 2008 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Second periodic report of States parties CROATIA* [28 November 2007] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.08-45541 (E) 091208 CCPR/C/HRV/2 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 - 13 4 Article 1 ......................................................................................................... 14 - 24 7 Article 2 ......................................................................................................... 25 - 41 10 Article 3 ......................................................................................................... 42 - 67 13 Article 4 ......................................................................................................... 68 - 70 20 Article 5 ......................................................................................................... 71 - 72 20 Article 6 ......................................................................................................... 73 - 84 21 Article 7 ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Minority Participation
    Political Parties and Minority Participation Skopje 2008 Publisher: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung - Office Macedonia, ul. Risto Ravanovski 3, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia http://www.fes.org.mk Cover design and pre-press: PROMO DSGN, Skopje Proofreading provided by BesTel Copies: 300 Copyright by Friedrich Ebert Stiftung CIP – Каталогизација во публикација Национална и универзитетска библиотека “Св.Климент Охридски”, Скопје 329-054.57(497) POLITICAL Parties and Minority Participation. - Skopje : Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2008. – 222 стр. : табели; 23 см Фусноти кон текстот ISBN 978-9989-109-44-7 а) Политички партии – Малцинска партиципација - Балкан COBISS.MK-ID 73540362 Contents: 5 Florian Bieber Introduction 31 Monica Caluser Minority Participation at the Local and National Level in Romania 49 Antonija Petričušić The Role of Political Parties in Minority Participation in Croatia 87 Marko Hajdinjak Thou Shall Not Take the Names Ethnic or Minority, And I Will Bless Thee: Political Participation of Minorities in Bulgaria 127 Dane Taleski Minorities and Political Parties in Macedonia 153 Gezim Visoka Political Parties and Minority Participation: Case of Roma, Ashkalia and Egyptians in Kosovo 179 Nedjeljka Sindik The Role of Political Parties in Minority Participation in Montenegro 201 Gjergj Sinani Minority in Albania and their Participation in Public Life 1. Introduction: Minority Participation and Political Parties 1. INTRODUCTION: MINORITY PARTICIPATION AND POLITICAL PARTIES By FLORIAN BIEBER Minority political participation is where minority rights and social attitudes towards minorities meet. Conventionally, minority rights include approaches to avoid discrimination and affirm cultural distinctiveness of the community. Minority rights have experienced substantial progress over the past decade. From a marginal topic during the Cold War, they have entered mainstream debates and instruments of human rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Krak Studia 7 3 2 Łam.Indd 485 2015-03-31 14:24:00 486 Dunja Pastović, Filip Hameršak
    Krakowskie Studia z Historii Państwa i Prawa 2014; 7 (3), s. 485–505 doi: 10.4467/20844131KS.14.036.3101 www.ejournals.eu/Krakowskie-Studia-z-Historii-Panstwa-i-Prawa DUNJA PASTOVIĆ, FILIP HAMERŠAK (University of Zagreb) Experiences and Challenges of Editing and Publishing Primary Legal-Historical Sources in Croatia Abstract The authors approach the topic of editing and publishing primary legal-historical sources from the per- spective of Croatian legal history as an academic discipline. Based on the earlier texts by Jakov Stipišić and Ivan Filipović, the fi rst part of the text discusses several possible approaches towards the editing and publishing of documents, showing that critical intellectual activity is required already when the ini- tial scope and mode of selecting and preparing the sources is decided upon. As a consequence, editing and publishing priorities are more or less directly connected to the particular interests and general meth- odological presumptions shared by the archivists, librarians and (legal) historians of a given society. The second part of the text – based on the works of Stjepan Antoljak, Zrinka Nikolić-Jakus, Mladen Ančić and personal insight – is thus dedicated to the most signifi cant or illustrative (either in a positive or a negative way) source-editing and publishing projects on what is today the territory of the Republic of Croatia, in as much as some of them were infl uenced not only by strictly scientifi c, but also by po- litical or ideological reasons. Pre-modern as well as modern and recent legal acts and other historical sources, including those typical of popular oral culture, are taken into account here.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Urbanization in Croatia. the Cases of Poreč in Istria and Makarska in Dalmatia
    Südosteuropa 67 (2019), no. 3, pp. 393-420 JASENKA KRANJČEVIĆ AND SANJA HAJDINJAK Tourism Urbanization in Croatia. The Cases of Poreč in Istria and Makarska in Dalmatia Abstract. Taking Croatia as a case in point, the authors compare the influence of spatial planning on tourism urbanization. To understand how tourism and spatial planning have interacted on a subnational level, two tourism centres on the Adriatic coast, Poreč in Istria and Makarska in Dalmatia, were chosen as case studies. The authors argue that while tourism- driven urbanization during the socialist era favoured the development of hotels paired with quality communal infrastructure and public facilities, the subsequent socio-economic transformation has oriented tourism investments towards private profit in ways that have often led to the neglect of public interest and facilities. The two chosen cases represent different paths, however. In the last thirty years, Makarska has fallen prey to what has come to be called apartmanizacija (apartmentization)—an usurpation of valuable coastal space through the uncontrolled construction of private apartments. Poreč, on the other hand, has maintained its well-planned space by carefully rebuilding and upgrading its hotel capacities. Jasenka Kranjčević is a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Tourism in Zagreb. Sanja Hajdinjak is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in the Department of Empirical Theory of Politics at the Geschwister Scholl Institute of Political Science at the Ludwig Maximilians- University in Munich. Introduction Croatia is one of the fastest developing tourism economies in the world, with tourism on average contributing more than 20% to the annual national An earlier draft of this article was presented at the conference ‘Socialist and Post-Social- ist Urban Transformation in Small Cities of Southeast Europe’, organized in Regensburg in November 2018 by the Leibniz Institute for East and Southeast European Studies in coop- eration with the Southeast Europe Association, Munich.
    [Show full text]