DOCSLIB.ORG

Download This Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download This Publication RUNNYMEDE Based on Proceedings of the Runnymede Conference of October 2002 held at the Barbican Conference Centre, London Developing Community Cohesion Understanding the Issues, Delivering Solutions Developing Community Cohesion Understanding the Issues, Delivering Solutions Contents Foreword 1 Runnymede and the Community Cohesion Debate 4 Promoting Community Cohesion John Denham (speaking at the Building Cohesive Communities conference) Community Cohesion: Conference Presentations 6 Conference Introduction: Bringing the Metaphor to Life Bhikhu Parekh 8 Policing a Multi-Ethnic Society Ian Blair 14 Facing the Challenges of Community Cohesion Beverley Hughes 16 Words,Wounds and the Power of the Media Gary Younge 20 Progress in Bradford on Community Cohesion Sharmila Gandhi Community Cohesion: Mini–plenaries & Policy Formulation Groups 23 1: Culture, Media and Sport featuring contributions from: Naseem Khan & Jennifer Edwards Nick Carter & Samir Shah Rakesh Chandar-Nair & Malcolm Tungatt 31 2: Health Linda Harris and Val Barker 33 3: Neighbourhood Renewal, Community Facilitation and Social Cohesion Chris Browne and Karl Oxford 37 4: Community Safety, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Martin Davis and Mike Nellis 38 5: (a)Employment Michelynn Laflèche (b)Education Robin Richardson Afterword 49 Summing Up the Conference Day Bhikhu Parekh 50 Bibliography Runnymede’s Developing Community Cohesion Conference October 2002 i Sponsored by the Community Cohesion Unit of the Home Office About Runnymede Our mandate is to promote a successful multi-ethnic Britain – a Britain where citizens and communities feel valued, enjoy equal opportunities to develop their talents, lead fulfilling lives and accept collective responsibility, all in the spirit of civic friendship, shared identity and a common sense of belonging.We act as a bridge-builder between various minority ethnic communities and policy-makers.We believe that the way ahead lies in building effective partnerships and we are continually developing these with the voluntary sector, the government, local authorities and companies in the UK and Europe.We stimulate debate and suggest forward- looking strategies in areas of public policy such as education, the criminal justice system, employment and citizenship. Acknowledgements Runnymede would like to thank all those who contributed to making this conference such a successful event: speakers, workshop presenters and moderators, active participants and engaged audiences. Special thanks go to the Home Office’s Community Cohesion Unit for their support, in helping to mount the October conference which marked the second anniversary of the publication of the Parekh Report, and for helping to finance the production of this Conference Special. Vic McLaren, principal organiser of the conference, had been seconded to Runnymede from the Home Office as a Policy Adviser in 2002/3. Assembling these conference proceedings was one of the last activities Vic completed before returning to the Civil Service, and we would like to thank him for his energetic organising of and input to a year of Community Cohesion for Runnymede, as described in the Conference Foreword. The views represented in this publication, with the exception of the Runnymede editorial, are of necessity personal – whether they are those of an organisation or an individual – and may not represent either Government’s or Runnymede’s policy positions. However, they do represent deeply held convictions about the best ways to promote community cohesion within a modern, multi-ethnic society. All conference photos were taken by Rod Leon First published in Great Britain in 2003 by The Runnymede Trust, Suite 106,The London Fruit and Wool Exchange, Brushfield Street, London E1 6EP [www.runnymedetrust.org] Copyright © 2003 The Runnymede Trust and individual authors ISBN: 0 9538164 4 3 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior written permission of the copyright owner of this book. Printed and bound in Great Britain by St Richards Press Ltd, Leigh Road, Chichester,West Sussex PO19 2TU. ii Runnymede’s Developing Community Cohesion Conference October 2002 Foreword Runnymede and the Community Cohesion Debate The Runnymede Trust has been a big player in the undertake its work, whilst Clarke and Ritchie had had to community cohesion debate over the past 18 months, respond to the immediate and pressing concerns of their despite its relatively small size. Runnymede has attempted localities, and Ted Cantle’s independent review team and to position itself as a ‘critical friend’ of government, and the inter-ministerial group had only three months in to work on issues of particular contemporary concern. which to try to distil some common themes and to During 2002 – following the previous summer’s identify lessons. ‘disturbances’, it could be argued that community On the whole, the various reports did a creditable job cohesion was one of the Government’s principal concerns in a very short period of time, providing a plausible – it was certainly one of the Home Office’s most pressing analysis of the causes of the disturbances: considerations. • lack of civic identity Runnymede had a particular stake in the issue of • fragmentation of communities social and community cohesion, for, back in the autumn • disengagement of young people from decision- of 2000, the Trust had published the Report of the making Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain • weak political and community leadership (CFMEB), a commission chaired by Lord Parekh, who • high levels of unemployment gave his name to the report.The report is still relevant • activities of extremist groups today, over two and a half years since its initial • disparity in police responses publication.The CFMEB report was wide-ranging in the • irresponsible press coverage scope of its recommendations, but also extremely The Government responded to all of this with prescient in anticipating and articulating a number of commendable urgency.The Denham Report provided concerns which arose in the wake of disturbances in that rare commodity, a concise overview of all Bradford, Burnley and Oldham. In the report, there is an government policies having a bearing on cohesion. John influential chapter (Ch.4) which stresses the importance Denham, the then minister for cohesion, made clear he of linking cohesion closely with issues around difference wanted all of the issues tackled quickly.A dedicated unit and equality. established in the Home Office during spring 2002 has The CFMEB report had a difficult birth. Newspapers been, and continues to be, both productive and receptive such as the Daily Mail and Daily Telegraph seized on one to external ideas and participation. particular chapter (a chapter which cast a critical eye over Runnymede has been supportive of the Community conventional accounts of British history) and seriously Cohesion Unit, and fully endorsed the decision to make misquoted, or misinterpreted, one solitary paragraph, to ‘community cohesion’ a defined aim of central and local suggest to its readership that the Commissioners felt the government. But as a critical friend would, it also took an term ‘British’ was racist.There then followed examples of early opportunity to raise a number of concerns: lazy journalism, where reporters from other newspapers First, Runnymede felt a need to draw attention to the took their lead from the Telegraph, without bothering to lack of definition in the Denham and Cantle reports go back to the primary source, and so, in consequence, regarding the term ‘ community cohesion’.Was this the authors of the report were called upon to defend simply a new term for ‘race relations’, rather in the same views they did not actually hold, and the report itself way that ‘urban regeneration’ had metamorphosed into became political hot property. ‘neighbourhood renewal’, or ‘poverty’ into ‘social This digression is necessary because it may explain exclusion’? On the face of it, the term appeared to why, amongst the welter of reports and recommenda- conflate separate concerns about public order (the initial tions which emerged in the run-up to Christmas of 2001, focus of government concern) with issues around social no references to the Parekh Report were to be found. connectedness and social capital, along with matters of While the Denham, Cantle, Ouseley, Clarke, and Ritchie social and racial equality. reports were all important in their own way, none was so Second, questions were raised about the carefully crafted, and with such a strong national focus, as recommendation made by the Cantle Team,but endorsed the Parekh Report. This was understandable, for the by ministers, for a national debate on the subject. For Commission had had two long years in which to Runnymede, the questions this raised were: Runnymede’s Developing Community Cohesion Conference October 2002 1 How was this debate to be conducted? chapter by Lord Parekh on the issue of common Who would be consulted? belonging, which Runnymede perceives as central to the When would the process be completed? community cohesion debate. And (finally) how would government know when Then in October 2002, to coincide with the second to signal closure? anniversary of the Parekh Report, and with funding Most of those questions have an
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AGMA Decisions Agreed 24 November 2017 FINAL, Item 3F PDF
    ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MANCHESTER AUTHORITIES KEY DECISIONS: AGMA – 24 NOVEMBER 2017 PRESENT: Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham Deputy Mayor Baroness Beverley Hughes (Police and Crime) Bury Council Councillor Rishi Shori, (Deputy Mayor) Manchester CC Councillor Richard Leese, (Deputy Mayor) Oldham Council Councillor Jean Stretton Rochdale BC Councillor Allen Brett Salford CC City Mayor Paul Dennett Stockport MBC Councillor Alex Ganotis Tameside MBC Councillor Kieran Quinn Trafford Council Councillor Sean Anstee Wigan Council Councillor Peter Smith OTHER MEMBERS IN ATTENDENCE: Fire Committee, Chair Councillor David Acton GMWDA, Chair Councillor Nigel Murphy TfGM, Chair, Councillor Andrew Fender Bolton Council Councillor Linda Thomas Bury Council Councillor Jane Black Bury Council Councillor Andrea Simpson Manchester CC Councillor Angelicki Stogia Stockport MBC Councillor Wendy Wild Tameside MBC Councillor Lynn Travis Tameside MBC Councillor Brenda Warrington Trafford Council Councillor Dylan Butt Trafford Council Councillor Laura Evans Wigan Council Councillor Jennifer Bullen OFFICERS IN ATTENDENCE: GMCA Chief Executive Eamonn Boylan GMCA – Deputy Chief Executive Andrew Lightfoot GMCA – Monitoring Officer Liz Treacy GMCA – Treasurer Richard Paver Office of the GM Mayor Kevin Lee Bolton Council Margaret Asquith Bury MBC Pat Jones Greenhalgh Manchester CC Joanne Roney Oldham Council Maggie Kufeldt Rochdale BC Steve Rumbelow Salford CC Jim Taylor Stockport MBC Pam Smith Tameside MBC Kathy Roe Trafford Council Theresa Grant Wigan Council Alison McKenzie-Folan TfGM Simon Warbuton GMFRS Dave Keelan Manchester Growth Co Mark Hughes GMCA Julie Connor GMCA Lindsay Dunn GMCA Simon Nokes GMCA Emma Stonier GMCA Sylvia Welsh APOLOGIES: Bolton Council Councillor Cliff Morris Oldham Council Carolyn Wilkins Rochdale BC Councillor Richard Farnell Tameside MBC Steven Pleasant Wigan Council Donna Hall GMP Ian Hopkins GMHSC Partnership Jon Rouse TfGM Jon Lamonte Agenda Item No.
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Not Go Back to 70S Primary Education Wikio
    This site uses cookies to help deliver services. By using this site, you agree to the use of cookies. Learn more Got it Conor's Commentary A blog about politics, education, Ireland, culture and travel. I am Conor Ryan, Dublin-born former adviser to Tony Blair and David Blunkett on education. Views expressed on this blog are written in a personal capacity. Friday, 20 February 2009 SUBSCRIBE FOR FREE UPDATES Let's not go back to 70s primary education Wikio Despite the Today programme's insistence on the term, "independent" is certainly not an apt Contact me description of today's report from the self-styled 'largest' review of primary education in 40 years. It You can email me here. is another deeply ideological strike against standards and effective teaching of the 3Rs in our primary schools. Many of its contributors oppose the very idea of school 'standards' and have an ideological opposition to external testing. They have been permanent critics of the changes of recent decades. And it is only in that light that the review's conclusions can be understood. Of course, there is no conflict between teaching literacy and numeracy, and the other subjects within the primary curriculum. And the best schools do indeed show how doing them all well provides a good and rounded education. Presenting this as the point of difference is a diversionary Aunt Sally. However, there is a very real conflict between recognising the need to single literacy and numeracy out for extra time over the other subjects as with the dedicated literacy and numeracy lessons, and making them just another aspect of primary schooling that pupils may or may not pick up along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Reshuffle – 5 June 2009 8 June 2009
    Ministerial Reshuffle – 5 June 2009 8 June 2009 This note provides details of the Cabinet and Ministerial reshuffle carried out by the Prime Minister on 5 June following the resignation of a number of Cabinet members and other Ministers over the previous few days. In the new Cabinet, John Denham succeeds Hazel Blears as Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and John Healey becomes Housing Minister – attending Cabinet - following Margaret Beckett’s departure. Other key Cabinet positions with responsibility for issues affecting housing remain largely unchanged. Alistair Darling stays as Chancellor of the Exchequer and Lord Mandelson at Business with increased responsibilities, while Ed Miliband continues at the Department for Energy and Climate Change and Hilary Benn at Defra. Yvette Cooper has, however, moved to become the new Secretary of State for Work and Pensions with Liam Byrne becoming Chief Secretary to the Treasury. The Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills has been merged with BERR to create a new Department for Business, Innovation and Skills under Lord Mandelson. As an existing CLG Minister, John Healey will be familiar with a number of the issues affecting the industry. He has been involved with last year’s Planning Act, including discussions on the Community Infrastructure Levy, and changes to future arrangements for the adoption of Regional Spatial Strategies. HBF will be seeking an early meeting with the new Housing Minister. A full list of the new Cabinet and other changes is set out below. There may yet be further changes in junior ministerial positions and we will let you know of any that bear on matters of interest to the industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobby Programme Emphasis in 2008 Keep Our Future Afloat Campaign
    Keep our Future Afloat 2008 Lobby programme emphasis in 2008 • Continuing to influence all political parties and shipbuilding industry leaders. • Meeting with the new Defence Procurement Minister, Baroness Taylor at the earliest opportunity. • Drawing attention to potential workload gaps and implications for production and design skills retention. • Securing orders for Barrow’s core expertise submarines, 7 Astute class. The UK needs a fleet that can surge in times of crisis, 4, 5 or 6 are not enough. • Highlighting Barrow’s role in the successor submarine (Vanguard replacement) programme and the need to proceed with the replacement deterrent fleet. • Promoting Barrow’s core competency and role in delivering nuclear submarines. • Highlighting Barrow’s role in building the Future Aircraft Carriers. • Seeking a role for Barrow in the MARS programme. • Publishing a lobby paper highlighting the benefits of the UK nuclear power station programme as a means of creating diversification opportunities for UK shipyards, a way of sustaining key nuclear skills and of enhancing the implementation of the Defence Industrial Strategy requirement to sustain key capabilities and promote opportunity for civil nuclear reactor build being undertaken in the UK instead of overseas. • Supporting BAE SYSTEMS diversification moves, particularly into nuclear and upstream oil and gas. • Ensuring that overseas shipyards do not gain a share of the market at the expense of Barrow and support build of warlike ships in UK not EU. • Securing MoD clarification of what it regards as ‘complex’ and ‘less complex’ naval ships which are not defined in the Defence Industrial Strategy. • Helping implement the new Defence Industrial Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Decennium 7/7 the United Kingdom Terrorist Attacks on July 7, 2005, and the Evolution of Anti-Terrorism Policies, Laws, and Practices
    Decennium 7/7 The United Kingdom terrorist attacks on July 7, 2005, and the evolution of anti-terrorism policies, laws, and practices By Prof. Dr. Dr. Clive Walker , Leeds I. Introduction might be termed ‘neighbour terrorism’ 5 has taken centre- 6 The tenth anniversary (the Decennium) of the 7 July 2005, stage rather than terrorism from alien sources. London transport bombings provides a poignant but appro- The human and material wreckage of 7/7 was also the priate juncture at which to reflect upon the lessons learned catalyst for signalling major changes in the long history of from those coordinated and severe terrorist attacks. 1 The United Kingdom counter-terrorism policy and laws. A com- killing of 52 civilians by four ‘home-grown’ extremists, who prehensive strategy, entitled CONTEST, which had been prepared in secret by 2003, 7 was finally unveiled to the public had been inspired by the violent ideology of Al Qa’ida, 8 marked the worst terrorist atrocity in the United Kingdom in 2006. The strategy includes the traditional approaches of since the Lockerbie air disaster of 1988. 2 The seminal im- ‘Pursuit’ (policing and criminal justice tactics). Protective portance of 7/7 resides in both the nature of the attack and the security (dubbed ‘Prepare’ and ‘Protect’) is also highlighted, official response, both marking a transition to a new, but not and this element builds on the Promethean and expensive duties of planning and resilience established in the Civil wholly distinct, stage of United Kingdom terrorism and coun- 9 ter-terrorism. Contingencies Act 2004. However, CONTEST also address- As for the nature of the terrorism, the characteristics of ji- es the more pioneering and problematic agenda of ‘Prevent’ – hadi terrorism, 3 with its vaulting ambitions, strident ideology ‘tackling disadvantage and supporting reform […] deterring those who facilitate terrorism and those who encourage oth- and disregard for civilian casualties signified new challenges 10 for the state authorities and public alike.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of the Democratic Left in Europe
    The crisis of the democratic left in Europe Denis MacShane Published by Progress 83Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressonline.org.uk Progress is an organisation of Labour party members which aims to promote a radical and progressive politics for the 21st century. We seek to discuss, develop and advance the means to create a more free, equal and democratic Britain, which plays an active role in Europe and the wider the world. Diverse and inclusive, we work to improve the level and quality of debate both within the Labour party, and between the party and the wider progressive communnity. Honorary President : Rt Hon Alan Milburn MP Chair : StephenTwigg Vice chairs : Rt Hon Andy Burnham MP, Chris Leslie, Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Baroness Delyth Morgan, Meg Munn MP Patrons : Rt Hon Douglas Alexander MP, Wendy Alexander MSP, Ian Austin MP, Rt Hon Hazel Blears MP, Rt HonYvette Cooper MP, Rt Hon John Denham MP, Parmjit Dhanda MP, Natascha Engel MP, Lorna Fitzsimons, Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, John Healey MP, Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Rt Hon Beverley Hughes MP, Rt Hon John Hutton MP, Baroness Jones, Glenys Kinnock MEP, Sadiq Kahn MP, Oona King, David Lammy MP, Cllr Richard Leese,Rt Hon Peter Mandelson, Pat McFadden MP, Rt Hon David Miliband MP,Trevor Phillips, Baroness Prosser, Rt Hon James Purnell MP, Jane Roberts, LordTriesman. Kitty Ussher MP, Martin Winter Honorary Treasurer : Baroness Margaret Jay Director : Robert Philpot Deputy Director : Jessica Asato Website and Communications Manager :Tom Brooks Pollock Events and Membership Officer : Mark Harrison Publications and Events Assistant : EdThornton Published by Progress 83 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HW Tel: 020 3008 8180 Fax: 020 3008 8181 Email: [email protected] www.progressives.org.uk 1 .
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers Reflect Jim Knight
    Ministers reflect Jim Knight May 2016 2 Jim Knight – biographical details Electoral History 2010-present: Labour Member of the House of Lords 2001-2010: Member of Parliament for South Dorset Parliamentary Career 2011-2014: Shadow Spokesperson (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) 2010-2011: Shadow Spokesperson (Work and Pensions) 2009-2010: Minister of State for Employment and Welfare Reform 2009-2010: Minister of State for the South West 2006-2009: Minister of State for Schools and Learners 2005-2006: Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) 3 Jim Knight Jim Knight was interviewed by Nicola Hughes and Catherine Haddon on 28th April 2016 for the Institute for Government’s Ministers Reflect Project. Nicola Hughes (NH): So if we can start back when you very first started as a minister, do you remember much of what your experience of coming into government was like? Jim Knight (JK): Yeah, well I remember things. I haven’t wiped it completely clean! So I was appointed to Defra [Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs] and as then subsequently was the way, when I was appointed to [the Department for] Education, the first thing I found out about was that I had a bill straight away. I had a Secretary of State in the form of Margaret Beckett who was quite hands off, was clear about what she wanted, and regular and effective and very inclusive ministerial meetings, but I think I only had one one-to-one with her in the whole year that I was working with her, which I took as an endorsement of trust and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Tittle-Tattle (Summer 2010)
    Lobster 59 Tittle-tattle Tom Easton The fall of St David The departure of the Lib-Con government’s Chief Secretary to the Treasury, David Laws, must cause a little alarm to other ministers whose expense records are held by The Daily Telegraph. Will their own financial affairs be revealed at critical times for the new coalition, they must be wondering. But for Laws, the co-editor of the Lib Dems’ Orange Book, who set himself up for a political career in Lord Ashdown’s old Yeovil seat after making a pile with JP Morgan and Barclays de Zoete Wedd, the press coverage was broadly sympathetic. Most of the media support the coalition, and so while accepting he had to go after the revelation of the £40,000 rent payment from the taxpayer, most still think he can a make a ministerial return following the New Labour precedents of Peter Mandelson, David Blunkett, Beverley Hughes and Peter Hain. Some journalists went further in their support for Laws. While his partner Matthew Parris was touring the studios urging Laws to stay on, Guardian columnist Julian Glover wrote twice in two days in support of the Yeovil MP. Before his departure Glover wrote: ‘The story of David Laws has an uncomfortable echo: the downfall of BP’s former chief executive John Browne.’ After he went, Glover described Laws as ‘this man of exceptional nobility’. Readers who want to assess Glover’s comparison with Lord Browne may care to read the judgment in that case of Mr Justice Eady, a man not known for upholding the press’s right 86 Summer 2010 to free expression in privacy matters.1 Those who want to weigh the ‘exceptional nobility’ of the former Chief Secretary, ‘Mr Integrity’, according to Ashdown, might start with this – <www.yeovil-libdems.org.uk/news/press/1305.htm> – from his recent Yeovil election campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Party Annual Report 2020 3 CONTENTS
    LABOUR PARTY ANNUAL REPORT 2 0 2 0 Labour Party Annual Report 2020 3 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION LABOUR PARTY MANAGEMENT . 45 Foreword from Keir Starmer . 5 Human Resources Report . 46 Introduction from Angela Rayner . 7 Introduction from the General Secretary . 8 2019/2020 National Executive Committee . 10 STABILITY IN OUR FINANCES . 49 NEC Committees . 13 Finances . 50 Obituaries . 14 Fundraising: NEC aims and objectives for 2020 . 15 fundraising and The Rose Network . 51 Events and Endorsements 2019/20: events, exhibitions, annual conference . 52 GENERAL ELECTION . 17 Donations, including sponsorship over £7 .5k . 55 2019 General Election . 18 Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 December 2019 . 56 PARLIAMENTARY BY-ELECTIONS . 25 Statement of Registered Brecon and Radnorshire . 26 Treasurer’s responsibilities . 57 LOOKING AHEAD: 2021 ELECTIONS . 27 APPENDICES . 81 Local and Mayoral Elections 2021 . 28 Members of Shadow Cabinet The year ahead in Scotland . 30 and Opposition Frontbench . 82 The year ahead in Wales . 31 Parliamentary Labour Party . 86 Members of the Scottish Parliament. 92 MEMBERS AND SUPPORTERS . 33 Members of the Welsh Parliament . 93 Building an active membership Members of the London Assembly . 94 and supporters network . 34 Directly Elected Mayors . 95 Equalities: Winning with Women; Leaders of Labour Groups . 96 BAME Labour; LGBT+ Labour; Labour Peers . 104 Disability Labour; Young Labour . 35 Labour Police and Crime Commissioners . 103 Parliamentary Candidates endorsed by the NEC at time of publication . 107 POLICY MAKING . 39 NEC Disputes . 108 National Policy Forum . 40 NCC Cases . 109 INTERNATIONAL . 43 International work/ Westminster Foundation for Democracy . 44 Labour Party Annual Report 2020 3 Introduction FOREWORD KEIR STARMER It is the honour of my life to lead our great running the Organise to Win review, and a movement .
    [Show full text]
  • LGIU Local Government Information Unit
    Ministerial, Shadow and regional responsibilities July 2007 - LGIU Page 1 of 5 LGIU Local Government Information Unit Independent Intelligent Information Ministerial, Shadow and regional responsibilities July 2007 (LGIUandSTEER) 9/7/2007 Author: Hilary Kitchin Reference No: PB 1526/07L This covers: England and Wales Overview This briefing provides an outline of new ministerial and shadow responsibilities in Communities and Local Government. There is as yet no timetable for publication of ministers' full range of responsibilities. Ministerial biographies of the DCLG team and and the names of ministers with regional responsibilities are set out in the main part of the briefing. Ministerial team at the Department for Communities and Local Government Secretary of State: The Right Hon Hazel Blears MP Minister of State - Yvette Cooper MP - housing Minister of State - John Healey MP - local government Parliamentary Under Secretary of State - Baroness Andrews OBE Parliamentary Under Secretary of State - Parmjit Dhanda MP - cohesion and neighbourhoods Parliamentary Under Secretary of State - Iain Wright MP - planning Special advisors to Hazel Blears: Paul Richards and Andy Bagnall, former councillors at Lewisham and Croydon respectively. Opposition changes of direct relevance to local government: Conservative Party responsibilities: Eric Pickles MP will replace Caroline Spelman MP as Shadow Communities Secretary. The front bench team is made up of MPs Grant Shapps, Alistair Burt, Paul Goodman, Bob Neil, and Jacqui Lait. Sayeeda Warsi, currently a Vice Chairman of the Party, will be given a peerage to take up a role as Shadow Minister for Community Cohesion http://www.lgiu.gov.uk/briefing-detail.jsp?&id=1526&md=0&section=briefing 09/07/2007 Ministerial, Shadow and regional responsibilities July 2007 - LGIU Page 2 of 5 Liberal Democrat responsibilities: Andrew Stunell MP retains his position as Shadow Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case to Answer
    A Case to Answer A first report on the potential impeachment of the Prime Minister for High Crimes and Misdemeanours in relation to the invasion of Iraq. Produced for Adam Price MP August 2004 www.impeachBlair.org All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording and/or otherwise without the prior permission of the publishers. First published in August 2004 by Adam Price MP House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Printed by Kinko’s Limited 1 Curzon Street London W1Y 7FN A Case to Answer A first report on the potential impeachment of the Prime Minister for High Crimes and Misdemeanours in relation to the invasion of Iraq. Produced for Adam Price MP Authors Chapter I: Glen Rangwala and Dan Plesch Chapter II: Dan Plesch With the assistance of Ffion Evans, John Fellows and Gwenllian Griffiths Glen Rangwala is a lecturer in politics at Newnham College, Cambridge. Dan Plesch is an Honorary Fellow of Birkbeck College, University of London and a Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the University of Keele. He is the author of the recently published The Beauty Queens’ Guide to World Peace. Foreword This report sets out compelling evidence of deliberate repeated distortion, seriously misleading statements and culpable negligence on the part of the Prime Minister. This misconduct is in itself more than sufficient to require his resignation. Further to this, the Prime Minister’s conduct has also destroyed the United Kingdom’s reputation for honesty around the world; it has produced a war with no end in sight; it has damaged and discredited the intelligence services which are essential to the security of the state; it has undermined the constitution by weakening cabinet government to breaking point and it has made a mockery of the authority of Parliament as representatives of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Policy and Politics: the Future of the State in the 21St Century
    Transforming Policy and Politics: The Future of the State in the 21st Century Bristol, 17th-18th September 2013 Working Paper Why Parties and Policies Matter and Networks Don’t A Case Study of the Children’s Services Policy Process Carl Purcell, Durham University [email protected] 1 Introduction This paper seeks to highlight the role played by the political parties in the children’s services policy process. This is neglected by the network governance and asymmetric power models which provide the two dominant perspectives on policy making in Britain (Laffin, 2013). Both highlight the influence of non-governmental interest groups over central government policy makers. The children’s services policy process is an appropriate case study because of the existence of a large number of such interest groups including the local government and professional associations alongside a number of well-established charity sector organisations which have seemingly had good access to central government policy makers in recent years. The focal point for the research was Labour’s Every Child Matters (ECM) programme (HM Government, 2003; 2004). This programme had a strong ‘governance narrative’ running through it. It sought to establish local Children’s Trusts to govern multi-agency networks of services across the public and charity sectors. The research examined the origins of the programme, the development of the ECM Green Paper (HM Government, 2003) and the subsequent reform programme. The development of the Conservative-led Coalition’s children’s services policy programme was then considered alongside this. Under the Labour Government the dominant influence of the Treasury over ECM was revealed.
    [Show full text]