arXiv:0907.3658v1 [hep-ex] 21 Jul 2009 h oa etioProblem Neutrino Solar The etioPhysics Neutrino nrwLowe Andrew & Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 Homestake 1 2.1 WhyStudySolarNeutrinos?...... 1 2.2 TheExperiment...... 3 2.2.1 TheCaptureReaction ...... 6 2.3 TheoreticalExpectations...... 6 2.3.1 TheStandardSolarModel...... 6 2.3.2 PredictedCaptureRates ...... 7 2.4 TheResults ...... 10
3 Kamiokande II 11 3.1 NeutrinoDetection ...... 13 3.1.1 Neutrino-Electron Scattering ...... 13 3.1.2 InelasticScattering ...... 15 3.1.3 Quasi-Elastic Neutrino-Nucleon Scattering ...... 15 3.2 Supernova1987A ...... 15 3.3 SolarNeutrinoResults ...... 17 3.3.1 Incompatibility of 37Cl and Water Cerenkovˇ Experiments ...... 17 3.4 AtmosphericNeutrinos ...... 18
4 Gallium Experiments 19 4.1 GALLEX ...... 19 4.2 GNO...... 19 4.3 SAGE ...... 20 4.4 TheGalliumProblem...... 20
5 Super-Kamiokande 21 5.1 ResultsfromSuper-Kamiokande...... 22
6 SNO 22
i 7 Evidence for New Physics 22 7.1 ThreeSolarNeutrinoProblems ...... 22 7.2 TheAtmosphericNeutrinoAnomaly ...... 24
8 Theory 24 8.1 Particle Physics Solutions ...... 24 8.2 Neutrino Oscillations ...... 25 8.2.1 TheMSWEffect ...... 27 8.2.2 MSDiagrams ...... 28
9 Evidence for Neutrino Oscillations 31
10 Outlook 34
ii 1 Introduction
Neutrinos are weakly interacting neutral particles that travel essentially at the speed of 1 1 light [1] and have intrinsic angular momentum of 2 h¯ [2]. There are three distinct types, or flavours, of neutrino (νe, νµ, and ντ ), corresponding to the three generations of leptons. There is strong evidence, namely, from studies of Z0 production in e+e− collisions at LEP [3], that no additional light neutrino types exist. Light neutrinos are those with mass less than half the Z0 mass. In 1930 Wolfgang Pauli hypothesised the existence of neutrinos to account for the ap- parent non-conservation of energy in beta-decay [2]. Four years later Enrico Fermi included Pauli’s hypothesised particle in a comprehensive theory of radioactive decay, and dubbed the new particle the neutrino, meaning “little neutral one” in Italian [4]. Neutrinos were subsequently discovered by Frederick Reines and Clyde L. Cowan, Jr., in an experiment performed in 1956 using a nuclear reactor [5]. Muon neutrinos were discovered later at Brookhaven National Laboratory [6], and were found to behave differently from those pro- duced in association with electrons. Tau neutrinos were finally observed in July 2000 at Fermilab by the DONUT (Direct Observation of NU Tau) Collaboration [7]. In 1964 Ray Davis and John Bahcall published papers [8, 9] proposing a 100,000 gallon (3.8×105 litre) detector of tetrachloroethylene to measure the solar neutrino capture rate on chlorine, thereby testing directly the theory of nuclear energy generation in stars. The detector was built in the Homestake Gold Mine in Lead, South Dakota, and was the first experiment to detect solar neutrinos. The first results from the experiment were published in 1968 [10, 11]. Currently seven experiments have observed solar neutrinos: Homestake, Kamiokande II, Super-Kamiokande, SAGE, GALLEX, GNO, and SNO [12, 13]. Those that have published results (all those listed except SNO) have detected fewer neutrinos than predicted from solar models, the degree of deficiency being different in detectors of different types. The are, in fact, three solar neutrino problems, but the long-standing discrepancy between the standard solar model predictions of neutrino flux and observational results has become known as the Solar Neutrino Problem.
2 Homestake
2.1 Why Study Solar Neutrinos?
Neutrinos are interesting to astronomers because they can reach us from otherwise inac- cessible regions where photons are trapped. In the Sun the mean free path of a photon is about 10−10 of the radius of the Sun; so short that it takes them several million years to diffuse from the solar interior to the surface. Neutrinos interact weakly with matter –
1This can be inferred from the measured arrival times of photons and neutrinos from Supernova 1987A.
1 cross-sections for a 1 MeV electron neutrino or electron antineutrino are of order 10−19 b [14] – and can escape directly from the solar core. The mean free path of neutrinos in matter are of order of several light-years. Neutrinos provide the only means of directly studying the processes that drive energy generation in the Sun’s interior. They are the signatures of the fusion reactions that create them. About 3% of the Sun’s energy is radiated in the form of neutrinos [15]. The solar neutrino flux at the Earth’s surface is about 1011 cm−2s−1 [15]. Solar neutrinos shine down on us during the day, and shine up on us during the night! Thermonuclear fusion in the Sun’s interior is the only known process sufficient to provide energy for the time scales required by biological, geological, and astronomical evidence. Fossils of primitive organisms have been found that are older than one billion years old, the earliest rocks are 3.8 billion years old, and meteorites have been found that are 4.5 billion years old. Gravitational energy release could support solar luminosity for only ten million years. Chemical energy would last only ten thousand years [16]. The idea that the Sun’s heat is produced by thermonuclear reactions that fuse light elements into heavier ones was suggested by Sir Arthur Eddington in 1920 [17] and expanded by Hans Bethe in his epochal 1939 paper [18]. The Sun is a typical main sequence star, calmly burning hydrogen without violent or rapid evolution. Energy generation in main sequence stars proceeds via the proton-proton (pp) chain or the carbon-nitrogen-oxygen (CNO) cycle, two distinct sequences of reactions. In his 1939 paper, Bethe favoured solar energy generation via the CNO cycle. The hydrogen burning process can be represented symbolically by the relation
1 4 + 4 H → He +2e +2νe + 25 MeV.
The idea of using chlorine as a detector of neutrinos was suggested by Bruno Pon- tecorvo in 1946 [19] and discussed in detail later by Luis W. Alvarez [20]. This lead Ray Davis, Jr., and Don S. Harmer to show, using a reactor and 3,000 gallon (1.1×104 litre) tetrachloroethylene detector at Savannah River, that νe andν ¯e are different [21]. The experimental discovery in 1958 that the cross-section for the production of 7Be by the fusion of 3He and 4He was more than a thousand times larger than was previously believed [22] lead to the suggestion, by Willy Fowler and Al Cameron, that 8B might be produced in sufficient quantities (from 7Be and protons) in the Sun to produce an observable flux of neutrinos from 8B beta-decay [23]. Prompted by this suggestion John N. Bahcall demonstrated in 1963 that the capture rate of 8B neutrinos on chlorine is enhanced by a factor of about 20 by transitions to excited states of argon [9]. Bahcall had also calculated the event rate to be expected in a 100,000 gallon tank of tetrachloroethylene. On the basis of Bahcall’s calculations, and Davis’ experience at Savannah River, Davis suggested the chlorine experiment that eventually located at the Homestake Mine. In 1964 Bahcall and Davis published papers [9, 8] proposing the feasibility of building a solar neu- trino detector “...to see directly into the interior of a star and thus verify directly the hypothesis of nuclear energy generation in stars.”[9]. The hypothesis being tested was that
2 proton fusion is the origin of solar energy. By 1964 it was widely accepted that the Sun shines almost entirely via the pp chain of reactions, although at the time there was still no direct evidence that thermonuclear fusion was responsible for solar energy generation. A measurement of the capture rate of 8B neutrinos on chlorine would verify the hypothesis of solar energy generation via thermonu- clear fusion and determine which sequence of reactions is dominant. Furthermore, because the 8B neutrino flux depends approximately upon the 24th power of the central temperature of the Sun, an upper limit for the central temperature could be set [9, 16].
2.2 The Experiment
The 37Cl detector was built deep underground to avoid background radiation from cos- mic rays. The neutrino target was 2.2×1030 atoms of 37Cl in the form of 100,000 gallons 5 (3.8×10 litre) of liquid tetrachloroethylene (C2Cl4), a common cleaning fluid. The tank containing the target was a cylinder about 6 m in diameter by 14.5 m in length, and was located 1.5 km underground in the Homestake Gold Mine in Lead, South Dakota. The total cost to excavate the cavity in the mine, build the tank, and purchase the liquid was $0.6 million (in 1965). The experiment began in 1968. The neutrino absorption reaction that was used to detect solar neutrinos was
37 − 37 νe + Cl → e + Ar.
The threshold energy for this reaction is 0.814 MeV. 37Cl was chosen as a target because of its favourable physical and chemical characteristics:
• The absorption reaction has a relatively low threshold, permitting detection of all solar neutrino sources except the pp neutrinos (see figure 5).
• The capture rate of 8B neutrinos on 37Cl is enhanced by more than an order of mag- nitude by transitions to excited states of 37Ar.
• 24.23%, a significant fraction, of naturally occurring chlorine atoms are 37Cl.
• Tetrachloroethylene is commonly used in dry-cleaning, and is manufactured on a large scale and relatively inexpensive.
• The capture process creates 37Ar atoms with sufficient energy to break free from the parent molecules. These argon atoms dissolve in the liquid, and are easily removed by purging with helium gas.
• The lifetime of 37Ar is 35 days. This is long enough that chemical extractions did not need to be performed too frequently, and short enough that many exposures could be obtained. Runs were typically of one to three months in duration.
3 Figure 1: The Homestake 37Cl solar neutrino experiment. (From [15]).
4 The chemical process was relatively simple. This was important for performing the exper- iment and for convincing sceptics of the validity of the results. A small (about 0.1 cm3) known amount of isotopically pure 36Ar (or 38Ar), a non-radioactive isotope of argon, was added to the tank and allowed to dissolve in the liquid before each exposure. The amount of argon recovered at the end of each run gave a direct measure of the efficiency of the extraction of 37Ar produced by neutrino capture. The argon was removed from the liquid by bubbling large quantities (about 4×105 litre) of helium gas through the system. The argon was separated from the helium gas by passing the gas through a condenser at 241 K, a molecular sieve at room temperature, and finally a charcoal trap maintained at 77 K. Purging the tank for 22 hours would usually recover 95% of the argon, which was retained on the charcoal trap. The charcoal trap was heated in order to release the argon that had condensed on it. The argon was then purified and the volume of the recovered sample was measured, which allowed the recovery efficiency to be calculated. Isotopic composition of the sample was determined by mass spectrometry at a later time. Davis and his collaborators have performed two additional tests demonstrating the high efficiency of the extraction of 37Ar. In one, a small neutron source was placed in the centre of the tank and the amount of 37Ar produced by the neutron source in the tank was measured. In the second test a measured number of 37Ar atoms (500) were added to the tank, and the quantity recovered was measured. A test was also performed to demonstrate that the 37Ar atoms produced by neutrino capture do not form molecules but instead become free neutral atoms. The radioactive 37Ar was counted by loading the sample of recovered argon in a small gas proportional counter. The sample was counted for about eight months to determine the background characteristics of the counter. The counters were calibrated every two months with a 55Fe source, and were upgraded continually during operation of the experiment. They were located underground in a laboratory at Homestake, and shielded from outside sources of background radiation by a lead shield [16]. The background was also minimised by using low radioactivity materials in the counting apparatus. The background rate in the counters, for runs made since 1984, was calculated to be 3.6 counts per year [16]. The main source of background in the experiment was caused by deeply penetrating muons produced by cosmic rays in the atmosphere. These cause cascades of energetic pions, protons, and neutrons that produce 37Ar [16]. Backgrounds from high-energy muons have been estimated by exposing 600 gallon (2271 litre) tanks of tetrachloroethylene at higher levels in the mine and then extrapolating production rates of 37Ar to the lower level where the Homestake experiment was located. The background capture rate from high-energy muons was estimated to be 0.08±0.03 day−1 [16].
5 2.2.1 The Capture Reaction
The neutrino capture reaction is
37 − 37 νe + Cl → e + Ar.
This may also be written
− νe + n → e + p.
The process can be illustrated by means of a Feynman diagram (figure 2).
− νe e
W
n p d u u u d d
Figure 2: The neutrino capture process.
Hence it is clear that the charged current weak interaction is responsible for the underlying process in the neutrino capture reaction.
2.3 Theoretical Expectations
2.3.1 The Standard Solar Model
At this point it is appropriate to discuss in greater detail the solar model that the Homestake 37Cl experiment was designed to verify. At the time that Bahcall and Davis published papers [9, 8] proposing the feasibility of a chlorine experiment, most theorists favoured solar models in which the pp chain was the primary source of energy generation, and that the CNO cycle is only significant for stars more massive and hotter than the Sun. However,
6 there was no direct evidence that these processes were involved in solar energy generation, and certainly no proof that the pp chain was the dominant process in the Sun. The reactions that occur in the pp chain and CNO cycle are shown in figure 3 and figure 4. Each completed conversion of four protons into an alpha particle, two positrons, and two electron neutrinos is known as a termination of the pp chain or CNO cycle. The percentages shown are the fraction of terminations of the pp chain or CNO cycle in which each reaction occurs. Neutrinos are produced in six of the reactions of the pp chain, and three of the reactions of the CNO cycle. These reactions are labelled on the diagram by the text in parentheses. The reactions take their names from the reactants. For example, the reactants in the “pep” reaction are proton, electron, and proton. Note the relative rarity of the 8B neutrinos. However, it is these neutrinos which dominated the predicted capture rate in the Homestake 37Cl experiment, because only these neutrinos are energetic enough to excite transitions between the ground state of 37Cl and excited states of 37Ar. Figure 5 shows the energy spectrum of solar neutrinos predicted by the standard so- lar model. Notice that line spectra are predicted for the 7Be and pep neutrinos. In the reactions that produce these neutrinos (see figure 3) there are only two final particles (2H and neutrinos, or 7Li and neutrinos). The laws of conservation of energy and momentum require that for two final state particles, the ratio of the kinetic energies of the particles is equal to the inverse ratio of their masses. The energy must always divide this way, therefore the 7Be and pep neutrinos are mono-energetic. With three or more final particles, such as those produced in the other reactions in the pp chain, the total energy of the reaction can be shared among the final state particles many ways, resulting in continuous energy spectra for the neutrinos produced in these reactions.
2.3.2 Predicted Capture Rates
For convenience, neutrino capture rates are expressed in terms of a special unit; the solar neutrino unit, or SNU (pronounced “snew”). A SNU is the product of neutrino flux times neutrino cross section. One SNU equals 10−36 captures per target atom per second. For the Homestake 37Cl experiment, one atom of 37Ar produced per day in the tank equals 5.35 SNU [16]. Two pieces of information are needed to calculate neutrino capture rates: the solar neutrino fluxes at the Earth, and the cross sections for the neutrino capture reaction. One might expect that the solar interior is too complex to predict neutrino fluxes, but that is not quite the case. At the temperatures and densities at the Sun’s core, the matter is fully ionised and is a close approximation of a perfect gas, hence the equation of state in the solar interior is relatively simple and can be calculated to sufficient accuracy to predict neutrino fluxes [16]. Neutrino capture cross sections can be determined empirically in nuclear physics experiments, and the nuclear properties of 37Cl and 37Ar are now well known. In 1964 scant information was available to Bahcall, but four years later improvements in the
7
2 + 2