DOCSLIB.ORG

Descendants of William PATCH-930 06 Jan 2013 Page 1 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Descendants of William PATCH-930 06 Jan 2013 Page 1 1 Descendants of William PATCH-930 06 Jan 2013 Page 1 1. William PATCH-930 (b. 1530-So Petherton, Somerset, England d. 15 Jun 1575-So Petherton, Somerset, England) sp: PATCH-931 (b. Abt 1532-So Petherton, Somerset, England) 2. Nicholas PATCH-831 (b. 1554/1558-South Petherton, Somerset, England d. 26 Dec 1637-South Petherton, Somerset, England) sp: Christiana DENMAN-1313 (b. Abt 1560-England m. 28 Jan 1578 d. 7 Dec 1579-South Petherton, Somerset, England) 3. Joannes PATCH-11849 (b. 7 Dec 1579-South Petherton, Somerset, England d. 15 May 1598) sp: Jane OWSLEY-832 (b. 1558-South Petherton, Somerset, England m. 1579/1580 d. 12 May 1633-South Petherton, Somerset, England) 3. Mary PATCH-833 (b. Abt 1580-South Petherton, Somerset, England) 3. Frances PATCH-835 (b. 24 Oct 1586-South Petherton, Somerset, England) sp: Walter BROWNE-1315 (m. 4 Nov 1621) 3. Edmund PATCH-836 (b. 23 Mar 1588/1589-South Petherton, Somerset, England d. 21 Feb 1597-S. Petherton) sp: Elizabeth BRACKENBURG-1030 (b. 23 Mar 1630-South Petherton, Somersetshire, England d. 15 Jan 1715-Beverly, , MA.) 3. John PATCH-837 (b. 18 Jan 1590/1591-South Petherton, Somerset, England d. 16 Aug 1617-S. Petherton) 3. Nicholas PATCH-839 (b. Abt 1591-South Petherton, Somerset, England d. 18 Feb 1593-S. Petherton, Somerset, England) 3. Elizabeth PATCH-671 (b. 16 Apr 1594-South Petherton, Somerset, England d. 26 Nov 1673-Beverly, Essex, Massachusetts) sp: William WOODBURY-670 (b. 1589-South Petherton, Somerset, England m. 29 Jan 1616 d. 26 Jan 1676-Beverly, E, Massachusetts) 4. Hannah WOODBURY-676 (b. 1617-So Petherton, Somersetshire, England d. 1703-Ipswich, Essex, MA) sp: James PATCH-478 (b. 18 Sep 1626-South Petherton, Somerset, England m. 1645/1646 d. 10 Aug 1658-Beverly, Essex, MA) 5. Mary PATCH-1848 (b. 6 Apr 1650-Ipswich, Essex, MA d. 12 May 1716-Beverly, Essex, MA) sp: Paul THORNDIKE Captain-1193 (b. 1643-Ipswich, Essex, MA m. 28 Apr 1668 d. 28 Apr 1698-Beverly, Essex, MA) 6. Mary THORNDIKE-1089 (b. 8 Jan 1669-Beverly, , Essex, MA d. 31 Dec 1732-Beverly, Essex, MA) sp: Robert MORGAN-511 (b. 8 May 1670-Beverly, , MA. d. 16 Jul 1762-Beverly, Essex, MA) 6. Elizabeth THORNDIKE-1849 (b. 14 Oct 1670-Beverly, Essex, MA d. 12 Jun 1727) sp: Samuel GOULD-1920 (b. 6 Feb 1670-Salem, Essex, Massachusetts d. 12 Jun 1727-Massachusetts) 7. Elizabeth GOULD-6955 (b. 15 Aug 1695-, Beverly, Essex, MA d. Abt 1696-, Beverly, Essex, MA) 7. Elizabeth GOULD-6956 (b. 18 Jul 1696-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 7. Samuel GOULD-6957 (b. 20 Nov 1699-, Beverly, Essex, MA d. 1707-, Beverly, Essex, MA) 7. Hannah GOULD-6958 (b. 23 Nov 1701-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 7. Joseph GOULD-6959 (b. 30 Nov 1702-, Beverly, Essex, MA) sp: Sarah BOWKER-6975 (m. 18 May 1726) 7. Lydia GOLD (GOULD)-6833 (b. 8 Aug 1706-Beverly, Essex, MASS d. 1750-Beverly, Essex, MASS) sp: Benjamin DIKE-6900 (b. 2 Feb 1703/1704-Beverly, Essex, MASS m. 19 Apr 1724 d. 18 Aug 1777-T, M, MASS) 8. ABIGAIL DIKE-6864 (b. 3 Mar 1726) 8. Benjamin DIKE-6936 (r. 11 Oct 1730-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 8. Elizabeth DIKE-6937 (r. 11 Oct 1730-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 8. Samuel DIKE-6938 (r. 21 Feb 1730-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 8. John DIKE-6939 (r. 16 Apr 1732-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 8. Stephen DIKE-6940 (r. 4 Aug 1734-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 8. Ann DIKE-6941 (r. 14 Nov 1736-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 8. William DIKE-6852 (r. 17 Apr 1740-Beverly, Essex, MASS d. 1787-Marblehead, Essex, MASS) sp: Eleanor SPENCE-6972 sp: Eunise Woodburry Gallup WOODBERRY-6855 (b. 21 Jun 1727-B, E, MASS m. 18 Nov 1761 d. Dec 1772-) 9. William DIKE-6849 (b. 25 Aug 1762-Beverly, Essex, MASS) 9. Susanna DIKE-6614 (b. 10 Feb 1764-Beverly, Essex, MASS d. 7 Oct 1846-Salem, Essex, MASS) sp: Joseph LEFAVOUR-6615 (b. 14 Apr 1764-Topsfield, Essex, MA m. 15 Jan 1785 d. 8 Jun 1838-) Descendants of William PATCH-930 06 Jan 2013 Page 2 10. Nathaniel LEFAVOUR-6590 (b. 20 Sep 1785-Ipswich, Essex, MASS d. 20 May 1820-Marietta, W, Ohio) sp: Hannah Fowler JENNESS-6964 (m. 16 Jan 1814) sp: Elizabeth MASON-6965 (m. 7 May 1818) 10. Lydia LEFAVOUR-6899 (b. 9 Jan 1790-Beverly, Essex, MASS d. 5 Jul 1877) sp: Jonathan 3Rd SYMONDS-6966 (m. 17 Dec 1809) sp: John MELCHER-6967 (m. 8 May 1842) 10. LEFAVOUR-6902 (b. 1791-, Essex, MASS) 10. Joseph Jr. LEFAVOUR-6903 (r. 22 Jun 1794-Ipswich, Essex, MASS d. 1850) sp: Mary (Polly) WILKINS-6968 (m. 3 Oct 1815) 10. (twin) LEFAVOUR-6832 (b. 20 Sep 1794-Ipswich, Essex, MASS d. 20 Sep 1794-Ipswich, Essex, MASS) 10. (twin) LEFAVOUR-6845 (b. 20 Sep 1794-Ipswich, Essex, MASS d. 13 Oct 1794-Ipswich, Essex, MASS) 10. LEFAVOUR-6857 (b. 1794-Ipswich, Essex, MASS d. 21 Sep 1794) 10. William DIKE LEFAVOUR-6848 (b. 29 Oct 1797-Salem, Essex, MA d. 11 Jul 1834-Salem, Essex, MA) sp: Elizabeth TARBOX-6969 (b. 1801-Salem, Essex, MASS m. 11 Nov 1821 d. 20 Apr 1844-) 11. Elizabeth A. LEFAVOUR-7009 (b. 22 Sep 1824-Salem, Essex, MA d. 16 Jun 1875-Salem, E, MASS) sp: Horace NUTTER-7090 (m. 22 May 1844) 11. William Henry LEFAVOUR-7010 (b. Oct 1825-Salem, Essex, MA d. 25 Mar 1841-Salem, E, MASS) 11. John S. LEFAVOUR-6994 (b. 7 Mar 1831-Salem, Essex, MA d. 13 Jan 1892-Salem, Essex, MA) sp: Louisa E. TEAGUE-6995 (b. 22 Aug 1831-Salem, Essex, MA d. 15 Apr 1917-Salem, E, MA) 12. William Johnson LEFAVOUR-6989 (b. 9 Nov 1851-Salem, Essex, MA d. 15 Sep 1916-) sp: Florence HAMMOND-6990 (b. 15 May 1851-B, E, MA m. 14 May 1874 d. 4 Mar 1924-) 13. Florence Winifred LEFAVOUR-6991 (b. 21 Mar 1875-Beverly, Essex, MA d. 13 May 1952) sp: Frank H. PLUMSTEAD-7084 13. Clara Louise LEFAVOUR-6992 (b. 21 Aug 1876-Beverly, Essex, MA d. 11 Mar 1944) sp: Thomas O. ELLIOTT-7085 13. Harry Shapleigh LEFAVOUR-6984 (b. 9 Apr 1891-Salem, Essex, MA d. 1986-S, E, MASS) sp: Marjorie PICKERING-6985 (b. 10 May 1897-D, , NJ m. 28 Jun 1916 d. 1985-) 14. LIVING LEFAVOUR-6986 sp: LIVING LEFAVOUR-7083 14. LIVING LEFAVOUR-6979 sp: LIVING LEFAVOUR-6980 15. LIVING LEFAVOUR-6981 15. LIVING LEFAVOUR-6982 15. LIVING LEFAVOUR-6983 12. Clarence Henry LEFAVOUR-6996 (b. 9 Jul 1859-Salem, Essex, MA) sp: Jennie GROVER-7087 (m. 7 May 1882) 10. Thomas LEFAVOUR-6859 (b. 29 Dec 1799-Salem, Essex, MASS) sp: Sarah (Sally) Morgan HOWE-6970 (b. 29 Aug 1803-Athens, Athens, OH d. 5 Dec 1866-, , Missouri) 11. Daniel Howe LEFAVOR-7122 (b. 1 Sep 1830-Salem, Essex, MA d. 29 Sep 1902-Fairfax, A, MO) sp: Matilda SISK-7347 (m. 26 Feb 1874) sp: Mary Ellen PARKER-7123 (b. 12 Dec 1838-Phillips, F, ME m. 9 Sep 1862 d. 2 Jun 1872-) 12. Martha Emma LEFAVOR-7124 (b. 21 Jan 1864-Union Star, Dekalb, MO d. 15 May 1903-) sp: Frank SNUFFER-7348 (m. 2 Jun 1881) 12. Sarah Ellen LEFAVOR-7125 (b. 23 Mar 1865-Union Star, Dekalb, MO d. 1 Sep 1943-) Descendants of William PATCH-930 06 Jan 2013 Page 3 sp: Patton Price MILLER-7349 (m. 29 Jan 1883) 12. William Thomas LEFEVOR-7081 (b. 9 Mar 1866-Near Union Star, D-Klb, MO d. 15 May 1953-) sp: Anne HAIGH-7080 (b. 22 Nov 1860-Bradford, Y, England m. 22 Dec 1891 d. 8 Jan 1929-) 13. Alfred LEFEVOR-7101 (b. 18 Oct 1892-Salt Lake City, Salt Lake, UT d. 20 Aug 1940-) sp: Rachel MILLER BIRD-7110 (b. 6 May 1894-S, S, UT m. 10 Jul 1915 d. 8 Aug 1966-) 14. Gene Elizabeth LEFEVOR-7063 (b. 31 Mar 1920-Salt Lake, Sl-K, UT d. 2 Nov 1974-) sp: Grover James MONSEN-7308 (m. 20 Nov 1937) sp: LIVING LEFEVOR-7307 14. Alfred Melvin LEFEVOR-7070 (b. 8 Nov 1923-Salt Lake, Sl-K, UT d. 2 Aug 1984-) sp: Thelma Jean ROSE-7309 (m. 7 Jan 1948(div)) 14. Paul Harold LEFEVOR-7064 sp: Marguerite Rolande Andree DEMAHIS-7304 sp: Doris Jean ARMSTRONG-7029 15. Paul Harold LEFEVOR Jr.-7097 sp: Kristen Sue VINCENT-7305 15. Gary Kent LEFEVOR-7098 sp: JULIE Ann LUNDSKOG-7281 16. LIVING LEFEVOR-7282 16. LIVING LEFEVOR-7283 16. LIVING LEFEVOR-7284 15. Laurie Anne LEFEVOR-7072 15. Kimberly LEFEVOR-7036 sp: Donald Neal HUNT-7306 sp: LIVING LEFEVOR-7303 13. William Thomas LEFAVOR Jr.-7079 (b. 25 Jun 1895-Salt Lake City, S, UT d. 18 Jan 1953-) sp: Ruth CHERRINGTON-7320 (m. 6 Mar 1915) 13. Warren Leslie LEFAVOR-7078 (b. 1 Oct 1899-Salt Lake City, SL, UT d. 10 Nov 1962-) sp: Eleanor Esther CROCKETT-7321 (m. 25 Nov 1919) 13. Vern Raymond LEFAVOR-7077 (b. 4 Mar 1902-Salt Lake City, SL, UT d. 12 Aug 1902-) 13. Helen LEFAVOR-7076 (b. 27 Apr 1906-Salt Lake City, Salt Lake, UT d. 24 Nov 1908-) 12. Charles Arthur LEFAVOR-7126 (b. 2 Aug 1868-Union Star, Dekalb, MO) 12. Lucy Ann LEFAVOR-7127 (b. 22 Feb 1870-Union Star, Dekalb, MO) sp: Frank ST JOHN-7350 12. Joseph LEFAVOR-7128 (b. 31 Mar 1872-Union Star, D, MO d. 1872/1873-US, D, Missouri) 11. Joseph LEFAVOR-7194 (b. 22 Jan 1839-Pleasant Hill, A, OH d.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explore Chepstow Museum
    Terrific Transport Explore You can find many different types of transport in displays all over the museum. Chepstow Have a look around and see how many different types of transport you can find. Museum How would you choose to travel home? Find your favourite and draw it here A trail for junior explorers Dastardly School Days Can you find the museum school room? In what Descriptions! ways is your classroom different? How to play Children used to study the Three Rs at school instead of literacy and numeracy - Find an object in the museum that you really like. Don’t let anyone else see what you are looking at! Reading, Writing and Arithmetic (maths) Think of 5 words you can use to describe the object. Share the 5 words with someone in your group and Did you know that children were ask them to find the object you are describing often forced to write with their right hand even if they were left- Here are some words to get you started handed? Which hand do you write with? Beautiful Plain Have a go at writing your name in this box using Rough Bumpy Shiny your other hand Round Hard Old Metal Pottery Decorated Funny Square Heavy Smooth Wooden Cool Collections Marvellous Medals Can you find the beautiful Look around the museum and find collection of butterflies hidden somewhere in the museum? Ask the medal won by Able Seaman for a clue if you’re stuck! The butterflies were collected by William Charles Williams Guy Fenwick Crowther, who lived near Usk in the 1890s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Hampden and Its Aftermath
    Maine History Volume 43 Article 3 Number 1 Here Come the British! 1-1-2007 The aB ttle of aH mpden and Its Aftermath Robert Fraser Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/ mainehistoryjournal Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Fraser, Robert. “The aB ttle of aH mpden and Its Aftermath” Maine History 43, no. 1 (January 2007): 21-40. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BATTLE OF HAMPDEN AND ITS AFTERMATH BY ROBERT FRASER The successful British attack on the Penobscot Valley in fall 1814 was to annex eastern Maine to Canada, a move taken to protect the important line of communications between Halifax and Quebec. New England merchants had opposed the War of 1812, as it destroyed their interna- tional trade, and most New Englanders tried to remain neutral during the fray. At Hampden, enemy threats brought them out to defend their homes. Although Great Britain returned the area to the United States at war’s end, the occupation of the Penobscot Valley had lasting implica- tions for the District of Maine. Between 1954 and 1984 Robert Fraser was assistant curator at the Cohasset Historical Society and a consultant to other historical societies. He writes historical articles for local newspa- pers and national magazines, and has published two books on light- houses and another on local history.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Manual
    THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES e 0' -V /r 4'a/ V MAINE LEGISLATIVE MANUAL. 1867. Compiled by the Secretary of the Senate and Clerk of the House. AUGUSTA: STEVENS & SAYWARD, PRINTERS TO THE STATE. 1867. STATE OF MAINE In Senate, January 29, 1867. Ordered, That the Secretary of the Senate be directed to prepare a Legislative Manual for 1867, containing a diagram of the Senate Chamber and the usual statistical matter, and that three hundred copies be printed for the use of the Senate. THOMAS P. CLEAVES, Secretary. House of Representatives, January 23, 1867. On motion of Mr. PERKINS of Kennebunkport, Ordered, That the Clerk of the House be directed to prepare a Legis- lative Manual for 18G7, containing the usual statistical matter, rules and diagram of the House, and cause the usual number of copies of the same to be published for the use of the House. F. M. DREW, Clerk. JK CONTENTS. PAGE. ' Civil Government, . 1 Heads of Departments, 2 Senators by Districts, 3 Senate of Maine, . 4 Representatives by Counties, 6 House of Representatives, 11 Rules of the Senate, 16 Rules of the House, 24 Joint Rules of the two Houses, 40 Memoranda, 45 Standing Committees of the Senate, .... 47 Special Committee of the Senate, .... 48 Standing Committees of the House, .... 49 Joint Standing Committees, ..... 62 Joint Select Committees, ...... 61 Executive and Legislative Officers of Maine from the organization of the State, ....... 67 Judiciary of Maine, . , . .71 Table showing the Tuesdays on which the several terms of the Supreme Judicial Court are to commence, ..
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of the Salem Village Witchcraft Trials : Illustrated by A
    iiifSj irjs . Elizabeth Howe's Trial Boston Medical Library 8 The Fenway to H to H Ex LlBRIS to H to H William Sturgis Bigelow to H to H to to Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2010 with funding from Open Knowledge Commons and Harvard Medical School http://www.archive.org/details/shorthistoryofsaOOperl . f : II ' ^ sfti. : ; Sf^,x, )" &*% "X-':K -*. m - * -\., if SsL&SfT <gHfe'- w ^ 5? '•%•; ..^ II ,».-,< s «^~ « ; , 4 r. #"'?-« •^ I ^ 1 '3?<l» p : :«|/t * * ^ff .. 'fid p dji, %; * 'gliif *9 . A SHORT HISTORY OF THE Salem Village Witchcraft Trials ILLUSTRATED BT A Verbatim Report of the Trial of Mrs. Elizabeth Howe A MEMORIAL OF HER To dance with Lapland witches, while the lab'ring moon eclipses at their charms. —Paradise Lost, ii. 662 MAP AND HALF TONE ILLUSTRATIONS SALEM, MASS.: M. V. B. PERLEY, Publisher 1911 OPYBIGHT, 1911 By M. V. B. PERLEY Saeem, Mass. nJtrt^ BOSTON 1911 NOTICE Greater Salem, the province of Governors Conant and Endicott, is visited by thousands of sojourners yearly. They come to study the Quakers and the witches, to picture the manses of the latter and the stately mansions of Salem's commercial kings, and breathe the salubrious air of "old gray ocean." The witchcraft "delusion" is generally the first topic of inquiry, and the earnest desire of those people with notebook in hand to aid the memory in chronicling answers, suggested this monograph and urged its publication. There is another cogent reason: the popular knowledge is circumscribed and even that needs correcting. This short history meets that earnest desire; it gives the origin, growth, and death of the hideous monster; it gives dates, courts, and names of places, jurors, witnesses, and those hanged; it names and explains certain "men and things" that are concomitant to the trials, with which the reader may not be conversant and which are necessary to the proper setting of the trials in one's mind; it compasses the salient features of witchcraft history, so that the story of the 1692 "delusion" may be garnered and entertainingly rehearsed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: the Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered Susan Kay Ocksreider College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Law Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Ocksreider, Susan Kay, "The Salem Witch Trials from a Legal Perspective: The Importance of Spectral Evidence Reconsidered" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625278. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-7p31-h828 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE SALEM WITCH TRIALS FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE; THE IMPORTANCE OF SPECTRAL EVIDENCE RECONSIDERED A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of Williams and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Susan K. Ocksreider 1984 ProQuest Number: 10626505 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10626505 Published by ProQuest LLC (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • The Records of the Salem Commoners, 1713-1739
    *h'l^\ ''"<> ' ' i t> . ft'. ' { I V ?.' yC> » '<^. r-^^ 7, , 'X' S ^"-n^. "»' <^^^ "'° ,%^ "V •- .^° ' = o^ *' > V % y •^. m^" ^^ X •^•° / ^ ^"^ rV^^^': ^o v^ ^0 ° <^- o^O. ^<^^ " O ' <^^ N \^ \> ,V r'. ^ -^ ^y^^* ^ ^ ..0^ ^P-^^^ -A .0 * 4^ <o ^..<< - .V THE RECORDS ^ f OF THE SALEM COMMONERS 1713-1739 COPIED BY " GEORGE FRANCIS DOW [From the Historical Collections of the Essex Institute, Volumes xxxvi-xxvix.l ' SALEM, MASS. PRINTED FOR THE ESSEX INSTITUTE 1903 SALEM COMMONERS RECORDS, 1713-1739. COPIED BY GEORGE FRANCIS DOW. First Booke of records of Minutes of y*' proprietors of y® Common lands in Salem & of their first Meeting which was y^ 29 Day of June 1713. A list of y^ proprietors as uel Golthites Junr in Salem 5 Daniel Epes Esqr 2 SALEM COMMONERS RECORDS, 1713-1739. [List of the proprietors] thiit attended y"^ proprietors Meeting in y*" Low ro(tnie where wee tir.sl began it, John Marsh Sen'" 1 Samuel Golthite 1 John Hutchison I Daniel Andrews 3 Wni Upton 1 Daniel Mackintire 1 Samuel Upton 1 Abraham Locyer 1 John Putnam Jun^' 1 John Nicholls 2 James Gould Sen"" 1 Stephen Sewall 2 Cap* John Gardner 2 Memorand". There was mr John Traske L* Jeremiah Neal Willard & Severall others to y® Number of about a doz° was at y'' beginning of y® Meeting with & seemed to Join with vs whilst y'' warrant was read & Seuerall debates & appeard to be a concurrence betwixt y'' proprietors & Cottagers viz that thay would choofse aConiitte ol both forts to Move to y^ Generall Court an Explanation of y'^ Law referring to Cottnges which all would set downe on & yet to y'" Surprise of Many of vs mr Jn*^ Trafke Sen'" Just as y** Moderator was chose slipt one of y'^ original warrants oft' y'" Table & put it in his pocket & nioued out of y*^ roome with about 10 or a Doz'^ more followed him & went vp in y*" Chamber oner y^ roome where wee were Met & tho wee fent to them to come & proceed on y*^ buf isness of y*" Meeting as they had begun but they did not comei Attest Stephen Sewall Cler.
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921
    Chithelen 1 Niall Chithelen HIST2090, Professor Norton Final Paper 11/29/17 It Takes a Witch to Punish a Rapist: Timothy Swan and the Essex County Witchcraft Crisis, 16921 Timothy Swan (1663-1693) was a resident of Andover in 1692, a sufferer from what Emerson Baker calls a “mysterious illness,” a member of a disagreeable family, and an alleged rapist.2 Over the course of the Essex County witchcraft crisis, sixteen women admitted to afflicting Swan, and he became a central figure in the Andover cases.3 In the chaos and suspicion surrounding the witchcraft trials, his would-be afflictrixes saw that Swan was visibly ill; they recognized their own revulsion toward him; and they concluded that they must be responsible for his sickness. Swan’s affliction became a warped form of justice; the women who admitted to afflicting Swan might well have been asserting their own ability to punish an offender whom the law had let free. Conflicts in Andover and the Swan Family Although the 1692 witch trials in Salem Village have been examined in great depth, the goings-on in Andover and surrounding villages remain murky. Mary Beth Norton describes the “spiraling circle of accusations,” whereby confessions and accusations piled upon one another, with accusations crossing village lines—Andoverites testified against George Burroughs, and 1 I am using the term “Essex witchcraft crisis” from: Mary Beth Norton, In the Devil’s Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002), 8. 2 Emerson W. Baker, A Storm of Witchcraft: The Salem Trials and the American Experience (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2014), 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Constitution. 1820
    Maine State Library Maine State Documents Maine House of Representatives Legislature Documents 1820 Maine Constitution. 1820 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalmaine.com/house_docs Recommended Citation "Maine Constitution. 1820" (1820). Maine House of Representatives. Paper 2. http://digitalmaine.com/house_docs/2 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Legislature Documents at Maine State Documents. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine House of Representatives by an authorized administrator of Maine State Documents. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONSTITUTION OF MAINE 1820 .. WE the people ofMaine, in order to establish justice, ensure Preamble. tranquillity, provide for our mutual defence, promote our common welfare, and secure to ourselves and our posterity the blessings of Liberty, acknowledging with grateful hearts the goodness of the Sovereign Ruler ofthe Universe in affording us an opportunity, so favorable to the design; and, imploring bis aid and direction in its accomplishment, do agree to form ourselves into a fi'ee and independent State, by the style and title of the State of lVlaine, and do ordain and establish the following Constitution for the government of the same. ARTICLE I. DECLARATION OF RIGHTS. SECT. 1. All men are born equally free and independent, and have certain natural, inherent and unalienable Rights, Natural ril!hts among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and of pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness. , SECT. 2. All power is inherent in the people; all free All powerinlie i' dd' h' h' d" di' entmthepe.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Legislative Manual, 1865
    MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) DOCUMENTS PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATURE OF THE \ ', ',, STATE OF ~AINE. 186 5. AUGUSTA: STEVENS & SAYWARD, PRINTERS TO THE STATB. 1865. JVIAlNE LEC+ ISLATJ\T_E 11ANUr\L. 18fi5. Prepared pur;,uant to order by 'l'HOMAS P. CLEAVES, ~ecretary of the Senate. AUGUS11 A: STEVENS & SAYWARD, PRINTERS TO THE STATE. 1K65. STA.1,E OF MAINE. IN SENATE, February I, 186f,. ORDERED, That the ~Acretary of the Senate be directed to prepare a Legislative Manual for 1865, containing a diagram of the Senate Chamber and the usual statistical matter, and that three hundred copies be printed for the use of the Senate. Read and passed, THOMAS P. CLEAVES, Secretary. A true cypy-Attest: THOMAS P. CLEAVES, Secretary. OONT:ENTS. PAGE, Civil Government, Heads of Departments, 2 Senators by Districts, 3 Senate of Maine, 4 Representatives by Counties, 6 House of Representatives, 11 Rules of the Senate, 16 Rules of the House, 24 ' Joint Rules of the two Houses, 40 Memoranda, 45 Standing Committees of the Senate, 47 Standing Committees of the House, 48 Joint Standing Committees, 51 ,Joint Select Committees, , 60 Executive and Legislative Officers of Maine from the organization of the State, 64 J udieiary of Maine, 68 Reporters of Decisions, 71 United States Senators, 72 Representatives in Congress from Maine, 72 State, Institutions, 74 County Officers, 76 Councillor Districts, 82 Length of Sessions of Legislature, 83 United States Government, 85 State Governments, 86 IV CONTEN'r8.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Afflicted: Daughters of Salem
    Morehead State University’s The Little Company Presents Study Guide 1 Authors Research Erin Sinead — Dramaturgy Format Design Zachary Fryman – Graphic Designer Curriculum Research Erin Sinead – Curriculum and Lesson Plan The Little Company Staff Octavia Biggs —The Little Company Director Corinne Campagna —The Little Company Tour Coordinator The Little Company Morehead State University 106 Baird Music Hall Morehead, KY 40351 606-783-2545 www.moreheadstate.edu/thelittlecompany www.facebook.com/The-Little-Company 2 Table Of Contents Title of Page Page Number Synopsis/ About the Author Page 4 Director Notes Page 5 Designer Notes Page 6 Puritan Religion Page 13 Witchcraft Page 14 Salem Witch Trials Page 15 Possible Causes Page 16 The Afflicted Women Page 17 Lesson Plans/ Core Standards Page 24 KCAS Standards Page 52 Vocabulary Page 59 3 Afflicted: Daughters of Salem Explores the possible reasons as to why five young girls, in Colonial Massachusetts, led a “crucible” of events known as the infamous Salem Witch Trials of 1692. Interestingly, historical accounts have been unable to fully explain what may have driven these adolescents to make such allegations that forever establish the legacy of Salem. This play examines the dangers of what can happen when young people are denied the sense of play and imagination, no matter what century. Through this denial, alliances are created and betrayed, promises are made and broken as the girls unite in a secret society. Laurie Brooks’ “Afflicted: Daughters of Salem” delves into a world of secrets, gossip, fear, lies and accusations and the dangers of spreading rumors. About the Author Laurie Brooks is an award-winning playwright and YA fiction author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of Correction: Additions
    KU ScholarWorks | http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu Please share your stories about how Open Access to this article benefits you. The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials by Peter Grund 2007 This is the author’s accepted manuscript, post peer-review. The original published version can be found at the link below. Peter Grund. 2007. “The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” Studia Neophilologica 79(1): 3–24. Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00393270701287439 Terms of Use: http://www2.ku.edu/~scholar/docs/license.shtml This work has been made available by the University of Kansas Libraries’ Office of Scholarly Communication and Copyright. Peter Grund. 2007. “The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials.” Studia Neophilologica 79(1): 3–24. (accepted manuscript version, post-peer review) The Anatomy of Correction: Additions, Cancellations, and Changes in the Documents of the Salem Witchcraft Trials1 Peter Grund, Uppsala University 1. Introduction The Salem witchcraft trials of 1692 hold a special place in early American history. Though limited in comparison with many European witch persecutions, the Salem trials have reached mythical proportions, particularly in the United States. The some 1,000 extant documents from the trials and, in particular, the pre-trial hearings have been analyzed from various perspectives by (social) historians, anthropologists, biologists, medical doctors, literary scholars, and linguists (see e.g. Rosenthal 1993: 33–36; Mappen 1996; Grund, Kytö and Rissanen 2004: 146). But despite this intense interest in the trials, very little research has been carried out on the actual manuscript documents that have survived from the trials.
    [Show full text]