Final Cruise Report: ROV Exploration of Deep
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Notes on the Occurrence of Some Poorly Known Decapoda (Crustacea) in the Southern North Sea
NOTES ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOME POORLY KNOWN DECAPODA (CRUSTACEA) IN THE SOUTHERN NORTH SEA by J. P. H M ADEMA Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, The Netherlands F CREUTZBERG & G J VAN NOORT Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, The Netherlands With 9 text-figures, 6 tables, 5 maps INTRODUCTION Since April 1972 an ecological trawl-survey programme has been undertaken by the Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ), Texel, in the southern North Sea with the R. V. "Aurelia". The main object is to obtain information on distribution, density, biomass and fluctuations of crawling or swimming demersal (epibenthic) fauna such as small fishes, shrimps, prawns, crabs, asteroids, ophiuroids and some gastropods, for the evaluation of the role of these carnivores in the benthic ecosystem of the southern North Sea. Sedimentological aspects of the area are described by Creutzberg & Postma (1979). Within the context of the present paper the most important feature is the mesh of 5 x 5 mm2 of the cod end of the 5V2 m beam-trawl used and the extensive area of 5000-10,000 m2 covered during each haul. These exceptional circumstances resulted into faunistically interesting catches which gave rise to a cooperation with taxonomic specialists of the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie (RMNH), Leiden. The present paper deals with decapod crustaceans, collected during "Aurelia"-cruises, which are considered to be scarce or rare in the southern North Sea, completed with data from bottom-samples and other sources The species in question are: Pandalina brevirostris, Spirontocans lilljeborgii, Alpheus macrocheles, Pontophilus spinosus, Pontophilus bi.spino.sus, Galathea dispersa, Ebalia tubero.sa, Ebalia tumefacta, Ebalia cranchii, Atelecyclus rotundatus, Monodaeus couchii, Callianassa subterranea, Callianas.sa tyrrhena, Upogebia stellata and Upogebia deltaura Of the genus Macropodia a number of specimens have been collected, which partly were identified as M. -
Checklist of Fish and Invertebrates Listed in the CITES Appendices
JOINTS NATURE \=^ CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Checklist of fish and mvertebrates Usted in the CITES appendices JNCC REPORT (SSN0963-«OStl JOINT NATURE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE Report distribution Report Number: No. 238 Contract Number/JNCC project number: F7 1-12-332 Date received: 9 June 1995 Report tide: Checklist of fish and invertebrates listed in the CITES appendices Contract tide: Revised Checklists of CITES species database Contractor: World Conservation Monitoring Centre 219 Huntingdon Road, Cambridge, CB3 ODL Comments: A further fish and invertebrate edition in the Checklist series begun by NCC in 1979, revised and brought up to date with current CITES listings Restrictions: Distribution: JNCC report collection 2 copies Nature Conservancy Council for England, HQ, Library 1 copy Scottish Natural Heritage, HQ, Library 1 copy Countryside Council for Wales, HQ, Library 1 copy A T Smail, Copyright Libraries Agent, 100 Euston Road, London, NWl 2HQ 5 copies British Library, Legal Deposit Office, Boston Spa, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS23 7BQ 1 copy Chadwick-Healey Ltd, Cambridge Place, Cambridge, CB2 INR 1 copy BIOSIS UK, Garforth House, 54 Michlegate, York, YOl ILF 1 copy CITES Management and Scientific Authorities of EC Member States total 30 copies CITES Authorities, UK Dependencies total 13 copies CITES Secretariat 5 copies CITES Animals Committee chairman 1 copy European Commission DG Xl/D/2 1 copy World Conservation Monitoring Centre 20 copies TRAFFIC International 5 copies Animal Quarantine Station, Heathrow 1 copy Department of the Environment (GWD) 5 copies Foreign & Commonwealth Office (ESED) 1 copy HM Customs & Excise 3 copies M Bradley Taylor (ACPO) 1 copy ^\(\\ Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report No. -
Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 © Director of National Parks 2013
Director of National Parks Parks of National Director Annual ReportAnnual 2012–13 Director of National Parks Annual Report 2012–13 Managing the Australian Government’s protected areas © Director of National Parks 2013 ISSN 1443-1238 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process, re-used or redistributed without prior written permission from the Director of National Parks. Any permitted reproduction must acknowledge the source of any such material reproduced and include a copy of the original copyright notice. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and copyright should be addressed to: The Director of National Parks, PO Box 787, Canberra ACT 2601. Director of National Parks Australian business number: 13 051 694 963 Credits Front cover Maps – Environmental Resources Information Network Acacia alata photographed at the Australian National Botanic Gardens Designer – Papercut – David Woltschenko Editor – Byron Smith for Embellish Creative Sunrise at Booderee National Park, looking out to Bowen Island Indexer – Barry Howarth Little kingfisher, Kakadu National Park – Louise Denton Printed by – Union Offset Co. Pty Ltd Red crab, Christmas Island National Park Kakadu ranger Samantha Deegan with baby northern quoll Background image: sea urchin – Margarita Goumas Map data sources Collaborative Australian Protected Area Database, (CAPAD 2010), Commonwealth Marine Reserves:© Commonwealth of Australia, Department of the Environment, 2013 State and Territory Borders, Australian Waters: © Commonwealth of Australia, Geoscience Australia Caveat: All data presumed to be correct as received from data providers. No responsibility is taken by the Commonwealth for errors or omissions. The Commonwealth does not accept responsibility in respect to any information given in relation to, or as a consequence of anything contained herein. -
Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia Tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J
Mar. Behav. Physiol. 1981, Vol. 8, pp. 149-161 0091-181X/81/0802-0149 $06.50/0 © 1981 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Inc. Printed in Great Britain Substratum Preferences, Burrowing and Righting in Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Leucosiidae) PATRICK J. SCHEMBRI† University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland KA28 OEG (Received November 17, 1980; in final form March 7, 1981) When given a choice, Ebalia tuberosa prefers sediment to a smooth plastic surface. Gravel is preferred to either sand or mud but no preference is shown between coarse and fine gravel. When overturned, the crabs may take from 2 to 900 s to right again, but males right in a shorter time than females, probably because they are less massive. E. tuberosa burrows by digging backwards into the sediment till half-covered. A variety of different mechanisms are then used to cover the remainder of the body. The crabs take from 130 to 1000 s to burrow completely and larger crabs of both sexes take longer to burrow than do smaller individuals. INTRODUCTION Almost nothing is known of the behaviour of any species of leucosiid crab. Ebalia tuberosa (Pennant) is a typical member of the family and is found in subtidal coarse sediments (Allen, 1967; Schembri, 1980). E. tuberosa buries itself in the substratum but does not construct a permanent burrow (Gosse, 1856) and shows numerous morphological and physiological adaptations for this mode of life (Balss, 1940; Glaessner, 1969; Schembri, 1979a,b, 1980, and papers in preparation). Apart from the semi-anecdotal descriptions of burrowinDownloaded by [University of Glasgow] at 12:15 29 September 2014 g in E. -
Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future Jan Pawlowski, Franck Lejzerowicz, Philippe Esling
Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future Jan Pawlowski, Franck Lejzerowicz, Philippe Esling To cite this version: Jan Pawlowski, Franck Lejzerowicz, Philippe Esling. Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Sur- veys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future . Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, 2014, 227 (2), pp.93-106. 10.1086/BBLv227n2p93. hal-01577891 HAL Id: hal-01577891 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01577891 Submitted on 28 Aug 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268789818 Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future Article in Biological Bulletin · October 2014 Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 26 41 3 authors: Jan Pawlowski Franck Lejzerowicz University of Geneva University of Geneva 422 PUBLICATIONS 11,852 CITATIONS 42 PUBLICATIONS 451 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Philippe Esling Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoust… 24 PUBLICATIONS 551 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: UniEuk View project KuramBio II (Kuril Kamchatka Biodiversity Studies II) View project All content following this page was uploaded by Jan Pawlowski on 30 December 2015. -
Dosima Fascicularis (Ellis & Solander, 1786) (Crustacea, Cirripedia) from the Galician Istributio D
Check List 10(3): 669–671, 2014 © 2014 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution N First record of the buoy barnacle Dosima fascicularis (Ellis & Solander, 1786) (Crustacea, Cirripedia) from the Galician ISTRIBUTIO D * RAPHIC G beaches (NW Spain) after the Prestige oil spill EO G Juan Junoy and Jorge Junoy N O EU-US Marine Biodiversity [email protected] Group, Franklin Institute and Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, AP 20. Campus Universitario, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain. OTES * Corresponding author. E-mail: N Abstract: Dosima fascicularis The presence of the buoy barnacle is first documented for Spanish waters. More than the half of the specimens collected was attached to tar pellets from the Prestige oil spill. DOI: 10.15560/10.3.669 Dosima fascicularis (Ellis & Solander, 1786) is a presumablycollected along from the the 1470 Prestige m of oil the spill; beach other longitude. attachment The stalked barnacle which capitulum bears five large plates. surfacesfloats of 53.8%were Velellaof the specimens were Sargassumattached to bladderstar balls, It is the unique barnacle that constructs its own float, a attachmentfoamy mass surfaces described (Darwin as similar 1851; to Minchin polystyrene, 1996; usingRyan tests (15.3%), floating items as feathers, tar balls and plastic particles as (7.6%) and feathers (2.5%). 20.8% of buoy barnacles lacked an obvious attachment object (Figure 2). theand BritishBranch Islands2012). The and species Baltic Seais widespread (Darwin 1851) in temperate but its sizeThe recorded average for thecapitulum species lengthwas 37 ofmm the in Europeancollected presenceand subtropical in European ocean waters,coast is reaching unusual in(O’ the Riodan NE Atlantic 1967; specimens was 17.7 mm (range 13–22 mm). -
We Would Like to Thank the Referees for Constructive Review, That Helped Us to Improve the Manuscript
We would like to thank the Referees for constructive review, that helped us to improve the manuscript. Written below are our responses to the Referee’s comments. The comments were reproduced and are followed by our responses. Anonymous Referee #1 This paper presents an interesting multiproxy dataset to document the paleoceanography near Svalbard and compares traditional sedimentary and microfossil proxies with a novel approach involving ancient environmental DNA. As such, the dataset certainly deserves publishing, but I have some comments/reservations about the age model and the discussion of the results. The discussion has some writing-technical issues. In several cases the own results are presented, without clear arguments supporting the interpretation (e.g. P12, L9–11 & L28–30; P15, L12– 15) but rather followed by a literature review. The own results need to be better used to document the paleoceanographic/ environmental signal that is gained from this new site and data, before comparing to the literature. Figures integrating the own results with key records from previous studies is also advised. Major comments Referee’s comment: First of all, the raw data needs to be made publicly available and/or presented with the manuscript. Needed are tables that list unique sample labels and relevant metadata such as core coordinates, sampling depths, measured data for each proxy (sedimentology, foraminifer assemblage data, stable isotopes and aDNA), etc. Response: According to the Reviewer’s suggestion, the raw data will be provided as electronic supplementary material. Referee’s comment: Age model. The ages used for the age model seem arbitrary. What is the argument to choose 1500, 2700 and 7890 yr BP? Those ages are not the average of the 2 sigma calibrated yrs BP. -
A Checklist of Turtle and Whale Barnacles
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2013, 93(1), 143–182. # Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2012 doi:10.1017/S0025315412000847 A checklist of turtle and whale barnacles (Cirripedia: Thoracica: Coronuloidea) ryota hayashi1,2 1International Coastal Research Center, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba 277-8564 Japan, 2Marine Biology and Ecology Research Program, Extremobiosphere Research Center, Japan Agency for Marine–Earth Science and Technology A checklist of published records of coronuloid barnacles (Cirripedia: Thoracica: Coronuloidea) attached to marine vertebrates is presented, with 44 species (including 15 fossil species) belonging to 14 genera (including 3 fossil genera) and 3 families recorded. Also included is information on their geographical distribution and the hosts with which they occur. Keywords: checklist, turtle barnacles, whale barnacles, Chelonibiidae, Emersoniidae, Coronulidae, Platylepadidae, host and distribution Submitted 10 May 2012; accepted 16 May 2012; first published online 10 August 2012 INTRODUCTION Superorder THORACICA Darwin, 1854 Order SESSILIA Lamarck, 1818 In this paper, a checklist of barnacles of the superfamily Suborder BALANOMORPHA Pilsbry, 1916 Coronuloidea occurring on marine animals is presented. Superfamily CORONULOIDEA Newman & Ross, 1976 The systematic arrangement used herein follows Newman Family CHELONIBIIDAE Pilsbry, 1916 (1996) rather than Ross & Frick (2011) for reasons taken up in Hayashi (2012) in some detail. The present author Genus Chelonibia Leach, 1817 deems the subfamilies of the Cheonibiidae (Chelonibiinae, Chelonibia caretta (Spengler, 1790) Emersoniinae and Protochelonibiinae) proposed by Harzhauser et al. (2011), as well as those included of Ross & Lepas caretta Spengler, 1790: 185, plate 6, figure 5. -
West Australian Marine Parks
Ashmore Reef West Australian Long Reef Marine Parks Argo-Rowley Terrace Rowley Shoals Montebellos Ningaloo 2 oceans 10 parks 12 locations Shark Bay 23 degrees of latitude 28 expeditions 150 pelagic taxa 2,850 midwater BRUVS 55,290 individual animals Perth Canyon Geographe Bay Recherche Archipelago Gracetown Bremer Canyon Ashmore Reef • Ashmore Reef Marine Park is a 583 km2 combination of both sanctuary (IUCN Ia) and recreational use (IUCN IV) zones located 630 kilometres north of Broome in the Australian External Territory of Ashmore and Cartier Islands. • These waters hold historical significance for traditional Indonesian fisherman, they retain access to resources in certain areas of the MPA. Our surveys • Two surveys were conducted in the dry seasons of 2017 and 2018. • 200 samples in waters up to 354 metres deep. • 809 individuals counted from 42 taxa representing 19 families. • Observations included a whale shark (Rhincodon typus) and an ocean sunfish (Mola mola). • The waters are dominated by predators and large prey. Key findings • The threatened silvertip shark (Carcharhinus albimarginatus) is more abundant here than any other location. • We saw a decrease in abundance on the second year of sampling, yet the average length of the animals observed almost doubled. predators large prey small prey Why Ashmore Reef matters • It is one of the 65 Australian Ramsar sites, which are locations of significant importance to seabirds, shorebirds, and other marine life they support. • This habitat seems to be an important site for vulnerable reef-associated species of shark such as the silvertip shark. • Ashmore Reef might act as a stopover on Whale shark (Rhincodon typus) the migration path of whale sharks. -
Deep-Water Scleractinia (Cnidaria : Anthozoa) from Southern Biscay Bay
Cah. Biol. Mar. (1994), 35: 461-469 Roscoff Deep-water Scleractinia (Cnidaria : Anthozoa) from southern Biscay Bay C. Alvarez-Claudio Departamento de Biologfa de Organismos y Sistemas, Zoologfa, Universi dad de Oviedo, 35005 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain Abstract : Fifteen ahermatypic sc1eractinian species belonging to 5 famili es were collected from 25 stations in a small area of Central Cantabrian coast off Asturias (southem Biscay Bay) . The spec imens were obtained From the continental shelf and slope (depth range 50-1347 m) by means of an anchor-dredge and epibenthic sledge. Résumé: Quinze espèces de Sc1éractiniaires ahermatypiques appartenant à cinq familles ont été récoltées en 25 stations d'une petite aire de la côte Cantabrique centrale au large des Asturies (partie Sud du Golfe de Gascogne). Les récoltes, sur le plateau et le talus continentaux, ont été faites au moyen d'une drague et d'un traîneau épiben tique à des profondeurs de 50 à 1347 m. INTRODUCTION The scleractinian coral fauna of the North eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean has been revised by Zibrowius (1980). He reported 34 species from Biscay Bay, most of them already collected by the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of twentieth century. Based on collections from BIOGAS (POLYGAS) and INCAL cruises Zibrowius (1985) further reported 17 species in depths ranging from 400 to 4829 m, all of them previously recorded in the Biscay Bay. These earlier accounts did not specially reflect the faunal richness of relatively small areas. Given sorne hydrodynamic singularities recently described in the southern Biscay Bay (Botas et al. , 1989, 1990 ; Fermindez et al., 1993) benthos studies carried out along the Central Cantabrian shelf and slope are of particular interest. -
Annotated Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea)
Tuhinga 22: 171–272 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2011) Annotated checklist of New Zealand Decapoda (Arthropoda: Crustacea) John C. Yaldwyn† and W. Richard Webber* † Research Associate, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. Deceased October 2005 * Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) (Manuscript completed for publication by second author) ABSTRACT: A checklist of the Recent Decapoda (shrimps, prawns, lobsters, crayfish and crabs) of the New Zealand region is given. It includes 488 named species in 90 families, with 153 (31%) of the species considered endemic. References to New Zealand records and other significant references are given for all species previously recorded from New Zealand. The location of New Zealand material is given for a number of species first recorded in the New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity but with no further data. Information on geographical distribution, habitat range and, in some cases, depth range and colour are given for each species. KEYWORDS: Decapoda, New Zealand, checklist, annotated checklist, shrimp, prawn, lobster, crab. Contents Introduction Methods Checklist of New Zealand Decapoda Suborder DENDROBRANCHIATA Bate, 1888 ..................................... 178 Superfamily PENAEOIDEA Rafinesque, 1815.............................. 178 Family ARISTEIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891..................... 178 Family BENTHESICYMIDAE Wood-Mason & Alcock, 1891 .......... 180 Family PENAEIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 .................................. -
Towards a New Synthesis of Evolutionary Relationships and Classification of Scleractinia
J. Paleont., 75(6), 2001, pp. 1090±1108 Copyright q 2001, The Paleontological Society 0022-3360/01/0075-1090$03.00 TOWARDS A NEW SYNTHESIS OF EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS AND CLASSIFICATION OF SCLERACTINIA JAROSèAW STOLARSKI AND EWA RONIEWICZ Instytut Paleobiologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warszawa, Poland ,[email protected]., ,[email protected]. ABSTRACTÐThe focus of this paper is to provide an overview of historical and modern accounts of scleractinian evolutionary rela- tionships and classi®cation. Scleractinian evolutionary relationships proposed in the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries were based mainly on skeletal data. More in-depth observations of the coral skeleton showed that the gross-morphology could be highly confusing. Profound differences in microstructural and microarchitectural characters of e.g., Mesozoic microsolenine, pachythecaliine, stylophylline, stylinine, and rhipidogyrine corals compared with nominotypic representatives of higher-rank units in which they were classi®ed suggest their separate (?subordinal) taxonomic status. Recent application of molecular techniques resulted in hypotheses of evolutionary relationships that differed from traditional ones. The emergence of new and promising research methods such as high- resolution morphometrics, analysis of biochemical skeletal data, and re®ned microstructural observations may still increase resolution of the ``skeletal'' approach. Achieving a more reliable and comprehensive scheme of evolutionary relationships and classi®cation