Mississippi River Commission∗

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mississippi River Commission∗ MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION∗ The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was improvements to include levees, headwater reservoirs, created by an act of Congress on June 28, 1879. The and pumping stations that maximize the benefits Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the realized on the main stem by expanding flood Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries protection coverage and improving drainage into (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three adjacent areas within the alluvial valley. officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Since its initiation, the MR&T project has brought Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three an unprecedented degree of flood protection to the civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All approximate 4 million people living in the members are appointed by the President with the advice 35,000-square-mile project area within the lower and consent of the Senate. Mississippi Valley. The Nation has contributed roughly $14,000,000,000 toward the planning, construction, The MRC has a proud heritage that dates back to operation, and maintenance of the project. To date, the June 28, 1879. Congress established the seven-member Nation has received a 34 to 1 return on that investment, presidential Commission with the mission to transform including $478,000,000,000 in flood damages the Mississippi River into a reliable commercial artery, prevented. while protecting adjacent towns and fertile agricultural lands from destructive floods. The 1879 legislation that The MRC continued its 130-year process of created MRC granted the body extensive planning listening to the concerns of partners and stakeholders in authority and jurisdiction on the Mississippi River the Mississippi Valley, inspecting the challenges posed stretching from its headwaters at Lake Itasca to the by the river, and partnering to find sustainable Head of Passes, near its mouth at the Gulf of Mexico. engineering solutions to those challenges through the The MRC quickly assumed the role of an active Federal 2011 High-Water Inspection (385th Session of MRC) agent capable of transcending the regional issues that and the 2011 Low-Water Inspection (386th Session). had previously hampered the development of a more During the fiscal year, MRC listened to, inspected effective river improvement system. The Commission alongside, partnered, and evaluated engineering began improving the navigation channel to promote solutions with more than 2000 stakeholders, state commerce, setting standards for levee construction, and representatives, non-government organization holding public hearings to give local interests a greater representatives, and local interests. The official record voice in shaping Federal policy. of the Proceedings of MRC, complete with recorded hearings of public meetings, copies of signed formal In its current capacity, the MRC prosecutes the statements provided by the public, executive summaries MR&T project authorized by the 1928 Flood Control of the Proceedings, and other documents of Act. The MRC is focused on watershed priorities and significance, are kept on file in the Office of the is carrying out a 200-year working vision. President in Vicksburg, Mississippi. The MR&T project employs a variety of The mission of MRC includes balancing the engineering techniques, including an extensive levee requirements of flood control, navigation and the system to prevent disastrous overflows on developed environment by providing water resource engineering alluvial lands; floodways to safely divert excess flows direction and policy advice to the Administration, past critical reaches so that the levee system will not be Congress, and the Army in a drainage basin that unduly stressed; channel improvements and comprises 41 percent of the United States and parts of stabilization features to protect the integrity of flood two Canadian provinces, and leads sustainable control measures and ensure proper alignment and management and development of water and related depth of the navigation channel; and tributary basin resources for the Nation’s benefit and the people's well-being. ∗ Authorizing legislation (Tables 41-D and 41-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 41-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 2011 The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage termi- nates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former The basin drains 41 percent of the US: - 31 States, mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecu- 2 Canadian Providences tion of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island, - Since August 1997, MRC has resumed its IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of inspection of upper Mississippi River. The improvements on designated tributaries and outlets Commission conducted a listening and below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, inspection tour of the Ohio River Basin in major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized 2005 and 2011, the Missouri River Basin in operations of MRC below Cape Girardeau are 2007, the Illinois River Watershed in 2009, conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, and the Arkansas River Basin in 2010, all in an Vicksburg, Memphis, and St. Louis Districts within the effort to share and learn from experiences from areas described below, in accordance with approved the watershed management of those tributary directives and programs and congressional basins. appropriations therefore. - Stakeholders and the public have requested 385th Session of MRC MRC involvement in major studies and projects. The Mississippi River conducted its 385th session from April 10-15, 2010, onboard the MV MISSISSIPPI - For projects and studies that require a broad en route from Hickman, KY, to New Orleans, LA, as watershed approach with multiple levels of part of the annual high-water inspection trip. The MRC interest, MRC’s authorities, resources, and held public hearings at Cairo, Memphis, TN; relationships continue to prove effective. Greenville, MS; and New Orleans. More than 220 members of the public attended the public The MRC provides a valuable forum, voice, and meetings. partner for diverse interests throughout the basin; implementation oversight for a range of water resource The members of the Mississippi River Commission activities and comprehensive management of the present during the 385th session included MR&T project; an established record of expertise and MG Michael J. Walsh, nominated as President of the accomplishment; a clear charter that includes the entire Mississippi River Commission on March 14, 2011; watershed; an avenue to task U.S. Army Corps and Honorable Sam E. Angel, reappointed as a member on National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration December 30, 2010; Honorable R. D. James, Civil (NOAA) for equipment and personnel; and working Engineer, reappointed as a member on April 16, 2003; relationships with the Chief of Engineers, the Assistant Honorable William Clifford Smith, Civil Engineer, Secretary of the Army for Civil Works (ASA(CW)), and appointed October 22, 1998; RADM Jonathan Bailey, Congress to address challenges and make National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, improvements in the watershed. 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION nominated as a member on March 14, 2011; MG John a detailed status update on the Missouri River W. Peabody, Commander, Great Lakes and Ohio River Authorized Purposes Study (MRAPS) being carried out Division (LRD), designated as member on August 4, by the Northwestern Division under the command of 2008; and BG John McMahon, Commander, Commission member BG McMahon. During its Northwestern Division, designated as a member on inspection of the Missouri River Basin in 2007, the November 20, 2009: and COL George T. Shepard Mississippi River Commission heard from numerous served as Secretary of the Commission which is a state governors and congressional officials on the nonvoting position. necessity to reexamine the management and uses of the Missouri River system. For years, stakeholders in the On Sunday, April 11, the 384th Session convened Mississippi Valley have also voiced their concerns on onboard the MV MISSISSIPPI in Cairo. the impacts of the Missouri River on the Mississippi COL Vernon Reichling, Commander of the Memphis River. In a formal statement in support of the study District, provided a detailed briefing on the status, dated August 20, 2009, the Commission requested that schedules, and issues of MR&T projects within his area MRAPS assess the impacts of potential Missouri River of operations. COL Reichling reported that the process flow regime changes on the Mississippi River and that for delivering a final Environmental Impact Statement the Northwestern Division brief the Commission
Recommended publications
  • Autumn on the Mississippi River Flyway
    FALL ’16 autumn on the mississippi river Flyway They are the original snowbirds, the tiny winged creatures that make their way from the nation’s heartland south come autumn’s first chill. Like many human counterparts, they’re off to winter along the country’s temperate coastal beaches or even more tropical climes of Central and South America —often via the skyway version of Mississippi’s Great River Road. Birds need diners and motels too, so to notes. That was true when the river flowed freely and remains speak, spots to rest and refuel, and their preferences are in true as it’s been impounded for navigation and flood control some cases as particular as that of a finicky toddler’s. Some and settlement has populated spots where forests or prairies find fuel through bugs, others via underwater plants, oth- once stood. ers fish, and still others find habitat in a bottomland forest. Some species didn’t fare well over time, many for reasons en- Birds key into the habitat needed to survive the long trip— tirely unrelated to changes to the river corridor. The passenger whether it’s aquatic plants, acorns or grassland plants or pigeons that once dotted skies over the flyway were rendered insects, so “it’s important to have that diversity up and extinct by uncontrolled hunting, the colorful Carolina parakeet, down the river to support them all,” says. Cathy Nigg, ref- once common in Missouri, killed off by a combination of the uge manager at the Port Louisa National Wildlife Refuge in popularity of their feathers for ladies hats, removal of forest hab- Wapello, Iowa.
    [Show full text]
  • Slides for ICMSSR Meeting 2018-03
    Interdepartmental Committee for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (ICMSSR) Meeting 2018-3 August 14, 2018 Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Services and Supporting Research 1 Opening Remarks Interdepartmental Committee for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (ICMSSR) Dr. Jack Kaye (NASA) Chair, ICMSSR • Welcome • Roll Call • Approve Agenda & Record of Action. • Meeting will be recorded Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Services and Supporting Research 2 Today’s Agenda • OPENING REMARKS: Jack Kaye (NASA) • ADMIN REMARKS: Michael Bonadonna (OFCM) • FEDERAL COORDINATOR’S UPDATE: William Schulz (OFCM) • COMMITTEE FOR OPERATIONAL ENVIRONEMENTAL SATELLITES UPDATE: Ajay Mehta (NOAA-NESDIS) • RECAP OF THE ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT AND DISPERSION WORKING GROUP - Dave Chorney (OFCM) • SPACE WEATHER ENTERPRISE FORUM: Michael Bonadonna • HAZARD SIMPLIFICATION PROJECT UPDATE: Eli Jacks (NOAA-NWS) • EARTH SYSTEM PREDICTION CAPABILITY (ESPC): Dave McCarren (USN) • OPEN DISCUSSION • ACTION ITEM REVIEW: Michael Bonadonna (OFCM) • CLOSING COMMENTS / ADJOURN Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Services and Supporting Research 3 Administrative Info • Facilities • Telecon / GoToMeeting – Dial-in 1-888-680-9581, passcode 535430# • GoToMeeting: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/293418653 • Slides posted at: http://www.ofcm.gov/icmssr/meetings.htm – Please advise us of any sensitivities Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology Services and Supporting Research 4 FEDERAL COORDINATOR’S
    [Show full text]
  • Geotechnical Overview
    I-66 CORRIDOR STUDY WESTERN KENTUCKY TO MISSOURI BALLARD / MCCRACKEN COUNTY - ITEM # 1-23.00 APPENDIX 5 – GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW Prepared for Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) – Division of Planning Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) – District 1 Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. In Association With: Qk4 Third Rock Consultants, LLC Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. Fuller, Mossbarger, Scott & May FEBRUARY 2005 Table of Contents Section Page No. 1. Project Description ................................................................ 1 2. Scope of Work ........................................................................ 2 3. Physiographic and Stratigraphic Setting............................. 3 3.1. Topography and Drainage............................................... 3 3.2. Stratigraphy..................................................................... 3 3.3. Soils and Unconsolidated Materials................................ 4 3.4. Groundwater................................................................... 4 3.5. Regional Seismicity ........................................................ 4 4. Existing Corridor Features ................................................... 6 4.1. General............................................................................ 6 4.2. Domestic and Public Areas............................................. 6 4.3. Other Features................................................................. 6 5. Geotechnical Concerns .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 307: Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (4/9/2008)
    Revisions to §307 - Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (updated November 12, 2009) EPA has not approved the revised definition of “surface water in the state” in the TX WQS, which includes an area out 10.36 miles into the Gulf of Mexico. Under the CWA, Texas does not have jurisdiction to regulate water standards more than three miles from the coast. Therefore, EPA’s approval of the items in the enclosure recognizes the state’s authority under the CWA out to three miles in the Gulf of Mexico, but does not extend past that point. Beyond three miles, EPA retains authority for CWA purposes EPA’s approval also does not include the application the TX WQS for the portions of the Red River and Lake Texoma that are located within the state of Oklahoma. Finally, EPA is not approving the TX WQS for those waters or portions of waters located in Indian Country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. The following sections have been approved by EPA and are therefore effective for CWA purposes: • §307.1. General Policy Statement • §307.2. Description of Standards • §307.3. Definitions and Abbreviations (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.4. General Criteria • §307.5. Antidegradation • §307.6. Toxic Materials. (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.7. Site-specific Uses and Criteria (see item under “no action” section below) • §307.8. Application of Standards • §307.9. Determination of Standards Attainment • Appendix C - Segment Descriptions • Appendix D - Site-specific Receiving Water Assessments The following sections have been partially approved by EPA: • Appendix A.
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Paper
    Raw earth construction: is there a role for unsaturated soil mechanics ? D. Gallipoli, A.W. Bruno & C. Perlot Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Laboratoire SIAME, Anglet, France N. Salmon Nobatek, Anglet, France ABSTRACT: “Raw earth” (“terre crue” in French) is an ancient building material consisting of a mixture of moist clay and sand which is compacted to a more or less high density depending on the chosen building tech- nique. A raw earth structure could in fact be described as a “soil fill in the shape of a building”. Despite the very nature of this material, which makes it particularly suitable to a geotechnical analysis, raw earth construc- tion has so far been the almost exclusive domain of structural engineers and still remains a niche market in current building practice. A multitude of manufacturing techniques have already been developed over the cen- turies but, recently, this construction method has attracted fresh interest due to its eco-friendly characteristics and the potential savings of embodied, operational and end-of-life energy that it can offer during the life cycle of a structure. This paper starts by introducing the advantages of raw earth over other conventional building materials followed by a description of modern earthen construction techniques. The largest part of the manu- script is devoted to the presentation of recent studies about the hydro-mechanical properties of earthen materi- als and their dependency on suction, water content, particle size distribution and relative humidity. A raw earth structure therefore consists of com- pacted moist soil and may be described in geotech- 1 DEFINITION OF EARTHEN nical terms as a “soil fill in the shape of a building”.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi River and Tributaries Project Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1928 and Amended by FCA ‘65
    Mississippi River & Tributaries Project Historic Flood of 2011 Mr. Donald R. Davenport Hydraulic Engineer/Silver Jacket Coordinator Memphis District US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Flooded 26,000 sq. miles 600,000 homeless Over 250 people killed Economic Damages ~$1B MR&T Project & 2011 Flood Facts • MR&T Project Authorized After the 1927 Flood-Flood Control Act of 1928 •Designed for a Project Design Flood (PDF) – Extreme Event w/Reasonable Chance of Occurrence •2011 Flood Exceeded 1927 and/or 1937 floods but was only about 80- 85% of PDF •MR&T Project contained the 2011 Flood despite being only 89% Complete while: •No MR&T Levees failed or were overtopped •Used 3 of 4 Floodways during the 2011 Flood (not Atchafalaya in New Orleans District) •Backwater Areas’ Flooding Limited to Interior Flooding Although Came Close to Using Yazoo BW Area in the Vicksburg Distrit US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Project Design Flood Rainfall 6 The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again. US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Memphis District Boundaries MRT Project in Memphis District .1,160 miles of Levees & Floodwalls .275 miles of Berms .1,300 Relief Wells .4 Corps Pumping Stations .1,300 miles of Channels .600 miles of Navigation Channel . 2 Harbors The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3. the Crust and Upper Mantle
    Theory of the Earth Don L. Anderson Chapter 3. The Crust and Upper Mantle Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, c1989 Copyright transferred to the author September 2, 1998. You are granted permission for individual, educational, research and noncommercial reproduction, distribution, display and performance of this work in any format. Recommended citation: Anderson, Don L. Theory of the Earth. Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1989. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBOOK:1989.001 A scanned image of the entire book may be found at the following persistent URL: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechBook:1989.001 Abstract: T he structure of the Earth's interior is fairly well known from seismology, and knowledge of the fine structure is improving continuously. Seismology not only provides the structure, it also provides information about the composition, crystal structure or mineralogy and physical state. In subsequent chapters I will discuss how to combine seismic with other kinds of data to constrain these properties. A recent seismological model of the Earth is shown in Figure 3-1. Earth is conventionally divided into crust, mantle and core, but each of these has subdivisions that are almost as fundamental (Table 3-1). The lower mantle is the largest subdivision, and therefore it dominates any attempt to perform major- element mass balance calculations. The crust is the smallest solid subdivision, but it has an importance far in excess of its relative size because we live on it and extract our resources from it, and, as we shall see, it contains a large fraction of the terrestrial inventory of many elements. In this and the next chapter I discuss each of the major subdivisions, starting with the crust and ending with the inner core.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol
    61277 Rules and Regulations Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 197 Tuesday, October 13, 2015 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER ACTION: Final rule. on the first day of the first applicable contains regulatory documents having general pay period beginning on or after SUMMARY: applicability and legal effect, most of which The U.S. Office of Personnel December 14, 2015. are keyed to and codified in the Code of Management (OPM) is issuing a final Federal Regulations, which is published under rule to establish special wage schedules FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510. specific to nonsupervisory, leader, and Madeline Gonzalez, by telephone at supervisory wage employees of the U.S. (202) 606–2858 or by email at pay-leave- The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) who the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of [email protected]. work at flood control dams (also known new books are listed in the first FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 5, REGISTER issue of each week. as reservoir projects) at the Vicksburg District of the Mississippi Valley 2015, OPM issued a proposed rule (80 Division. This final rule assigns lead FR 32042) to establish special wage OFFICE OF PERSONNEL agency responsibility for establishing schedules specific to nonsupervisory, MANAGEMENT and issuing these special wage leader, and supervisory wage employees schedules to the Department of Defense of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 5 CFR Part 532 (DOD). The special wage schedules (USACE) who work at flood control established will have rates of pay dams (also known as reservoir projects) RIN 3206–AN17 identical to the Memphis, TN, at the Vicksburg District of the appropriated fund Federal Wage System Prevailing Rate Systems; Special Wage Mississippi Valley Division.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of TENNESSEE V. MICHAEL DALE RIMMER
    IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON August 2006 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MICHAEL DALE RIMMER Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 98-01033-34 W. Fred Axley, Judge No. W2004-02240-CCA-R3-DD - Filed December 15, 2006 Capital Appellant Michael Dale Rimmer appeals as of right his sentence of death resulting from the 1997 murder of Ricci Ellsworth. In November 1998, Appellant Rimmer was convicted of theft of property, aggravated robbery and premeditated first degree murder. He was sentenced to death for the murder conviction. On direct appeal, a panel of this Court affirmed Appellant Rimmer’s convictions but, concluding that the sentencing verdict was “enigmatic and uncertain,” vacated the sentence of death and remanded for a new sentencing hearing. See State v. Michael D. Rimmer, No. W1999-00637-CCA-R3-DD, 2001 WL 567960, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App., at Jackson, May 25, 2001). Accordingly, the case was remanded to the Criminal Court for Shelby County for re-sentencing. At the conclusion of the re-sentencing hearing in January 2004, the jury found the presence of one statutory aggravating circumstance, i.e., that the defendant was previously convicted of one or more felonies whose statutory elements involved the use of violence to the person, T.C.A. § 39-13-204(i)(2) (1997). The jury further determined that the aggravating circumstance outweighed the mitigating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt and imposed a sentence of death. The trial court approved the sentencing verdict. Appellant Rimmer
    [Show full text]
  • Italy and China Sharing Best Practices on the Sustainable Development of Small Underground Settlements
    heritage Article Italy and China Sharing Best Practices on the Sustainable Development of Small Underground Settlements Laura Genovese 1,†, Roberta Varriale 2,†, Loredana Luvidi 3,*,† and Fabio Fratini 4,† 1 CNR—Institute for the Conservation and the Valorization of Cultural Heritage, 20125 Milan, Italy; [email protected] 2 CNR—Institute of Studies on Mediterranean Societies, 80134 Naples, Italy; [email protected] 3 CNR—Institute for the Conservation and the Valorization of Cultural Heritage, 00015 Monterotondo St., Italy 4 CNR—Institute for the Conservation and the Valorization of Cultural Heritage, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-06-90672887 † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 28 December 2018; Accepted: 5 March 2019; Published: 8 March 2019 Abstract: Both Southern Italy and Central China feature historic rural settlements characterized by underground constructions with residential and service functions. Many of these areas are currently tackling economic, social and environmental problems, resulting in unemployment, disengagement, depopulation, marginalization or loss of cultural and biological diversity. Both in Europe and in China, policies for rural development address three core areas of intervention: agricultural competitiveness, environmental protection and the promotion of rural amenities through strengthening and diversifying the economic base of rural communities. The challenge is to create innovative pathways for regeneration based on raising awareness to inspire local rural communities to develop alternative actions to reduce poverty while preserving the unique aspects of their local environment and culture. In this view, cultural heritage can be a catalyst for the sustainable growth of the rural community.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit, District, and Council General and Contingency Planning Guide for Boy Scouts of America©
    Doctorial Project for Completion of the Degree Doctorate, Commissioner’s Science Boy Scouts of America University of Scouting Commissioner’s College Unit, District, and Council General and Contingency Planning Guide for Boy Scouts of America© Version 0.99b 4 February 2010 By Larry D. Hahn, Lt Col, USAF Ret Unit Commissioner Chesapeake Bay District Colonial Virginia Council 2010 - BSA General n Contingency Planning Guide - L. Hahn.docx Approval Letter Advisor Memorandum for Record To: Larry D. Hahn, Unit Commissioner (Doctorial Candidate) From: Ronald Davis, District Commissioner (Candidate’s Advisor) CC: Lloyd Dunnavant, Dean, Commissioners College Date: January 10, 2019 Re: Approval of BSA Scout University Doctorial Project After careful review of the submitted project from Larry D. Hahn for completion of his Commissioner’s College doctorial degree, I grant my approved and acceptance for the degree of Doctorate (PhD) in Commissioner’s Science through the Boy Scouts of America, University of Scouting. As of this date, and as his advisor, I submit this signed letter as official documentation of approval. Ronald Davis Advisor Chesapeake Bay District Commissioner Approval Letter Council Commissioner Memorandum for Record To: Larry D. Hahn, Unit Commissioner (Doctorial Candidate) From: Mike Fry, Council Commissioner CC: Ronald Davis, District Commissioner (Candidate’s Advisor) Date: January 10, 2019 Re: Approval of BSA Scout University Doctorial Project After careful review of the submitted project from Larry D. Hahn for completion of his Commissioner’s College doctorial degree, I grant my approved and acceptance for the degree of Doctorate (PhD) in Commissioner’s Science through the Boy Scouts of America, University of Scouting.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation.Gov Lafayette County Sheriff Dept
    At Enid Lake you will find some of the most modern exceptional fishing opportunities for other species as camping facilities in the region. Our campgrounds well including: bass, bluegill and catfish. Enid’s staff 101 are extremely popular among camping enthusiasts. partners with local volunteers annually to enhance The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers at Enid Lake fish habitat through placement of approximately maintains and operates 5 Class A campgrounds 1,500 cedar tree tops and 2,000 wooden stakes to 97 98 which include: Wallace Creek, Persimmon Hill, construct 500 fish shelters in the lake bed. Located at 75 79 99 Chickasaw Hill, Ford’s Well and Water Valley the Outlet Channel Recreation Area is a large fishing 100 78 96 Road Enid Dam 73 74 94 95 637 Landing. pier with facilities and access specifically designed for 76 77 80 85 43 81 87 use by the physically challenged. 46 82 1 83 89 44 84 86 93 Enid Lake not only provides premier camping 4 45 88 2 90 3 47 opportunities, but offers many other recreational Enid also has 13 boat ramps located around the lake 6 48 92 8 5 59 91 opportunities including hiking, boating, swimming, to provide boating access for a variety of boating 49 57 68 7 58 60 69 71 picnicking, fishing, hunting, boating, horseback needs. The largest and most utilized of these boat 9 50 61 6270 riding and wildlife viewing. Enid Lake has been ramps is McCurdy Point which offers a floating boat 10 51 52 63 72 11 66 64 recognized as one of America’s Top 10 Fishing dock and rubber landing which eases loading and CR38 56 165 55 67 65 Spots, and Enid’s Persimmon Hill Campground has unloading of equipment and to accommodate larger CR39 53 54 Wallace Creek been selected as one of America’s Top 100 Family vessels.
    [Show full text]