DOCSLIB.ORG

F ~Edom Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
F ~Edom Party THE OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FREEDOM PARTY OF ONTARIO MAY 1990 F ~edom Party Last issue in my Openers column rich pay" philosophy --- the very philosophy (What to do about the GST?), I warned espoused by Marxist-Leninists and which is against false and misleading tax protests now being openly shared by New based on the myth of "fair" taxation. Democrats and Liberals alike. This fact was Thanks to a group calling itself the Stand illustrated quite clearly at a "tax protest" Up for Canada Coalition. a perfect rally held in London Ontario on the weekend illustration of how not to protest taxes was of the staged anti-GST demonstration. provided within weeks of my warning. Among the speakers were University of Western Ontario law professor Rob Martin On the weekend of April 7-9, 1990, the (a past -NDP candidate) and Liberal MP Joe coalition staged an anti-GST protest which Fontana, possibly two of the worst choices included the distribution of literature, public in the entire city (David Peterson, with 33 rallys, and the provision of a "1-900" number tax hikes to his credit, would have been too to call for those wishing to register their obvious a target.) to select as credible "tax­ protest by phone. protesters". When law professor Rob Martin made it abundantly clear that he's "not opposed to Some "tax" protest! While the Stand Up paying taxes. .." --- as long as they're paid for Canada Coalition may have been by "corporations", the "wealthy", and tax protesting the GST, it sure wasn't opposed "cheaters" --- he also made it clear that to higher taxes. Campaigning on a theme what he really meant is that he's not declaring Canada's current tax system opposed to somebody else paying taxes. "unfair", the coalition had a "solution": a fair However, considering that most of the food tax system. "Fair", in the eyes of this left­ we eat, the appliances we buy, and the few wing coalition means, in their own words, the luxuries of life that many can afford are following: made by the very corporations to whom 1. Make the big corporations pay. Martin would shift the tax burden, it's not 2. Base income tax on ability to pay. hard to see who really ends up paying the increased tax --- everyone, in the form of 3. Get rid of tax loopholes for the increased prices where the tax is better wealthy. hidden. 4. Tax wealth. What this all adds up to is a "Make the As an avowed socialist and supporter of the New Democratic Party, each and every a consequence, ignorance leads voters to economic policy Martin has advocated over support the very taxes they think they're the years is precisely what makes annual tax fighting, while those who misrepresent the increases inevitable. And through my own cause of "fair" taxes end up being the only personal involvement in fighting taxes at the winners in a political game that has nothing municipal level. I can remember only too well whatsoever to do with lowering taxes. when Joe Fontana (as a London municipal Eventually, even the decieved come to realize councillor and controller) supported a that their taxes aren't going down --- and likely whopping self-awarded pay increase to never will --- so that ultimately, the worst thing municipal councillors and the spending of $110 possible happens: voter apathy sets in, and million tax dollars to fund the 1991 Pan-Am everybody comes to believe that there is Games in London. (Both issues were publicly nothing that can possibly be done about the protested by Freedom Party, the latter situation. successfully, the former not.) More recently, Fontana has advocated continuing to pour tax dollars into losing enterprises like VIA Rail. What moral or rational justification could possibly qualify either of these two representatives as tax protesters? What possibly makes them think they're so different from the Conservatives they're criticizing, and what makes them think that taxing the rich and corporations is any better than a GST? Perhaps a question more to the point is how Doing the wrong things can't help, but doing could anyone honestly interested in lowering the right things always does. Many people taxes possibly take "tax protesters" like Rob become apathetic not because they haven't Martin and MP Joe Fontana seriously? been active or trying to "change" things, but because they've been following the wrong course of action --- which invariably leads to the wrong conclusions and outcomes. Reality has a way of making itself heard. In the case of taxes, most still choose to blind themselves _ to a solution by falsely believing the "other guy" can afford to provide them with social benefits for ever and ever, and worse, by believing that this is "fair" and just. simply because the "other guy" makes more money. As I pointed out last issue, voter ignorance, Like all taxes, the GST is simply another means for politicians to rob citizens of their apathy, and support are the three greatest hard-earned dollars, a process made obstacles to fighting ever-increasing taxes. necessary, ironically, by a government There is overwhelming evidence that voters in committed to maintaining socialist spending Canada today simply do not understand that programs --- the kind of programs supported there is a direct connection between by New Democrats like Martin and Liberals like government spending and their individual Fontana. From the perspective of the taxes. Believe it or not. 75% of respondents to individual taxpayer however, Conservatives, a recent Canadian poll on government Liberals, and New Democrats are all cut from spending and taxation actually believed that the same cloth. Where Conservatives want to the government has "its own" money and tax consumption (through a GST), socialists should be able to afford the many social programs to which it has committed itself. As (cont'd on back cover) OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, AND FOR THE PEOPLE -DEMOCRACY RECONSIDERED- BURLINGTON. LONDON. OAKVILLE. WOODSTOCK (November. 1989 - May 1990> Regular readers of Freedom Party's Freedom versus democracy, publication. Consent. will be familiar with the series of essays ("Can We Survive . speake~ tells·of difference Democracy?") concerning our warnings of the Sttry H" ,"Ita lIy TEl TO •• dangers inherent in any democratic system If TN Se,tIHHI,,". that allows itself to degenerate into simple ::- Marc Emery began his speech majority rule: many. however. may not be aware much as one would expect him to, that we have been gradually presenting these addressing a group of high school warnings to the public and that a great deal of students fresh from debating world affairs at a mock United Na­ positive interest has been generated by our tions assembly Thursday. activity. The 32-year-old London busi­ nessman, who has "a burning pas­ sion for freedom and individual Iib­ For example. in Oakville and Burlington. FP's erty" said he never thought he'd see the day when the Berlin Wall regional vice-president William Frampton's two would come down, when one soli­ editorials on the democratic process were tary man in Tiananmen Square published in the pages of the Oakville Beaver could hold up a line of tanks for and the Burlington Post. editorials which both hours, when people would give a global cry for freedom, and sacri­ challenged the principle of majority rule and fice everything, even their lives, to LONDON BUSINESSMAN Marc offered an alternate. more representative way achieve it. Emery addressed an attentive, it of voting for those who represent us in Then he dropped the bo~bshell. somewhat hostile, crowd tallow· government. A 'sample of each from the "Unfortunately, they're being be~ ing the high school United Na­ trayed, because what they want is tions assembly at the Fairview Burlington Post has been reproduced for your freedom, but what they're getting Centre Thursday. interest. o is democracy. " (Statt photo~ All that means, he told his now­ '" There was no time to dwell on '".-< captive audience, is that a govern­ this seeming paradox. Emery was .,; ment decides what the peop,le will Meanwhile in London on January 11. 1990. a demanding things of his audience, .-< get. A democratic government col­ London Free Press editorial headlined C lects various opinions and lays some quick mathematical calcula­ tions. There are more than a mil­ "Upholding rule of law is everyone's concern" ~ down judgement, just like any 11 dictatorship. And since the govern­ lion laws in Canada, which seems sparked a debate in that paper's editorial . quite a lot "to keep 25 million peo­ pages that ultimately involved FP's action ~ ment has a monopoly on force, it uses coercion to enforce those ple in line. That's a tremendous director Marc Emery. president and leader ~ jUdgements. number for a basic society. Most of <ll these laws restrict individual free­ Robert Metz. and provincial secretary Jack . ~ Business as usual Emery knows something about doms. Can anybody name one that Plant. among others. We've reproduced ~ gives you freedom? samples of the debate. pro and con. so that a; jUdgements. On Sundays, it's busi­ c ness as usual at his used bookstore, "People assume we ·don 't need a you can decide which arguments hold true. j City Lights. For flouting the law, c revolution here, because we have <ll he cooled his heels in a provincial Majority-rule democracy was openly en democracy. But that's exactly why correction centre for four days. we need one, a peaceful one." challenged in the community of Woodstock -t; And while his time there was a where FP action director Marc Emery's 3 mind-numbing experience, "the Emery's message.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Updated Review of the Risks and Harms Associated to the Use Of
    An Updated Review of the Research on the Risks and Harms Associated to the Use of Marijuana Dr Darryl Plecas, Jordan Diplock and Len Garis; Centre for Public Safety and Criminal Justice Research, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University College of the Fraser Valley Introduction Currently and in recent years, there is a continued debate over the personal use of marijuana in North America and around the world. The debate remains adversarial and is receiving a large amount of public attention in various media. It is commonplace for former supporters of the existing drug control policies to publicly announce their changes of opinion. In British Columbia, several former Attorneys General joined a growing number of activists looking for decriminalization and legalization (Mulgrew, 2012). In early 2012, the former US District Attorney, John McKay, who prosecuted Marc Emery, a Canadian, for selling marijuana seeds to American residents, has publicly denounced prohibition policies (CBC News, 2012). At the same time, the focus of the marijuana debate continues to be dominated by arguments about how prohibition does nothing more than put money into the pockets of organized crime, punish otherwise law abiding citizens, violate people’s right to put whatever they want into their bodies, and throw good tax dollars after bad on a failed war on drugs (Harris, 2012). Decriminalization or legalization of marijuana, the advocates commonly argue, is really the only sensible solution. What seems to have become increasingly lost in the debate over the personal use of marijuana, however, is a consideration of the negative effects that marijuana can have on users and how those harms can be addressed within any policy direction.
    [Show full text]
  • AA-Postscript 2.Qxp:Layout 1
    THURSDAY, AUGUST 14, 2014 INTERNATIONAL ‘Prince of Pot’ back in Canada from US prison OTTAWA: Canada’s self-proclaimed the pro-pot movement. US justice drug trafficking. Uruguay, the first small amounts of cannabis, instead never charged him with drug “Prince of Pot” Marc Emery returned officials said he sold more than four country to fully legalize production, of laying criminal charges. An esti- offenses-should not have handed home Tuesday, vowing “political million marijuana seeds over the sale and distribution of marijuana, mated one million out of a total 35 him over to the United States. As revenge” after spending more than Internet, three fourths of which meanwhile called for bids this million Canadians regularly smoke well, he criticized the ruling Tories four years in a US prison for selling were mailed to customers in the month from private growers who marijuana, according to recent sur- for delaying his return to Canada. marijuana seeds by mail across the United States. During his incarcera- want to farm cannabis in a public veys. Opposition Liberal leader “My own government betrayed me border. The ardent advocate of tion, however, calls for softening field. The US attorney who drew up Justin Trudeau, who admitted smok- and I’m going to wreak an appropri- legalizing marijuana was met by his marijuana laws across the Americas the indictment against Emery has ing pot since being elected to ate amount of political revenge wife, Jodie, and supporters in have grown louder, including a New also come out in favor of legaliza- Parliament in 2008, has said he when I get home,” he told public Windsor, Ontario before embarking York Times editorial last month com- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • To Mister James Wall Ambassador of Canada to the Netherlands
    The Hague, May 22nd, 2010 To mister James Wall Ambassador of Canada to the Netherlands Today we join the worldwide protest rally to free Canadian cannabis activist Marc Emery, who was extradited to the USA this week. We request you to consider the facts below and do everything in your power to make sure Marc Emery will not spend five years in an American prison. In the Netherlands, sale of cannabis seeds is legal. The VOC (Vereniging voor Opheffing van het Cannabisverbod: Association for the abolition of cannabis prohibition) is convinced that cannabis should and will be legal. Marc Emery is not a criminal and should not be treated as such. • Marc Emery is a Canadian citizen who never went to the USA as a seed seller. • Marc Emery operated his seed business in Canada at all times, with no American branches or employees. • Marc Emery declared his income from marijuana seed sales on his income tax, and paid over $580,000 to the Federal and Provincial governments from 1999 to 2005. • Marc Emery is the leader of the British Columbia Marijuana Party, a registered political party that has regularly participated in elections. • Marc Emery has never been arrested or convicted of manufacturing or distributing marijuana in Canada, as he only sold seeds. • Marc Emery gave away all of the profits from his seed business to drug law reform lobbyists, political parties, global protests and rallies, court litigation, medical marijuana initiatives, drug rehabilitation clinics, and other legitimate legal activities and organizations. • Marc Emery helped found the United States Marijuana Party, state-level political parties, and international political parties in countries such as Israel and New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations Jeff Dunham Trivia Contest
    www.pgcitizen.ca | Tuesday, May 11, 2010 7 news It’s not who is - it’s who isn’t using Internet The Canadian Press web or visit Facebook last year. more in a typical week, compared usage rates at 89 per cent apiece. The greatest gap, though, relat- “There’s an age group where the with 49 per cent in 2007. A similar proportion of men (81 ed to household income. About 94 TORONTO — It’s no longer a usage is approaching saturation, While Newfoundland and per cent) and women (80 per per cent of people from house- question of who’s using the Inter- there’s very little room to grow,” Labrador and New Brunswick had cent) used the Internet in 2009. holds with incomes of $85,000 or net in Canada, it’s who isn’t. said Statistics Canada analyst Ben the lowest percentages of citizens Among Canadians living in com- more used the Internet in 2009, A new Statistics Canada study Veenhof, who added that not only online, with 69 and 73 per cent, munities with populations of compared with 56 per cent in has found 80 per cent of Canadi- are more people going online, but they had the largest growth since 10,000 or more, 83 per cent used households with incomes of ans aged 16 and older, or 21.7 mil- they’re staying there longer. 2007 with 15 per cent increases. the Internet compared with 73 per $30,000 or less. The respective lion people, used the Internet for Of those who identified them- The highest rates of Internet users cent of those from communities proportions in 2007 were 90 and personal reasons last year, up from selves as Internet users, 75 per at 85 per cent were in both British with fewer people.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnostics Militants Favorables À La Légalisation Du Cannabis
    Document généré le 24 sept. 2021 22:53 Drogues, santé et société Où est le problème ? Diagnostics militants favorables à la légalisation du cannabis Where is the problem? Militant diagnoses favor legalization of cannabis ¿Dónde está el problema? Diagnósticos militantes favorables a la legalización del cannabis Marie-Philippe Lemoine Cannabis : santé et politiques publiques Résumé de l'article Volume 16, numéro 1, mars 2018 Cet article explore la diversité des discours militants favorables à la légalisation du cannabis au Canada. Dans les débats entourant une réforme de URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1044309ar politique publique, la définition du problème constitue une étape cruciale. DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/1044309ar Nous présentons ici les cadrages diagnostiques sur lesquels différentes organisations canadiennes soutenant la légalisation du cannabis fondent leurs Aller au sommaire du numéro plaidoyers. Dans le cadre de cette recherche, douze organisations militantes s’entendant sur la nécessité de légaliser le cannabis ont été sélectionnées pour la variété de leurs positions. Une analyse de cadres a été appliquée à des sources documentaires et au contenu d’entretiens semi-dirigés réalisés entre Éditeur(s) octobre 2015 et mars 2016. Ces acteurs collectifs de la société civile émettent Drogues, santé et société des constats variés quant à la nature du problème que pose le régime actuel ou que pourraient poser de « mauvais » modèles de légalisation. Nous avons identifié quatre principaux types de cadrages diagnostiques dans les discours ISSN des acteurs : 1) le diagnostic basé sur l’inefficacité ; 2) le diagnostic critique ; 3) 1703-8847 (numérique) le diagnostic d’injustice et 4) le diagnostic politique.
    [Show full text]
  • TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 1 TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 2 TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 3 TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 4
    TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 1 TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 2 TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 3 TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 4 Publisher/ Editor in Chief Marco Renda [email protected] Assistant to Editor Jef Tek [email protected] Copy Editor Aendrew Rininsland [email protected] Magazine design & layout Ivan Art [email protected] Director of Sales & Marketing Michelle Rainey [email protected] Technical Writer Ally a.k.a Pflover [email protected] Q&A Advisor Shantibaba [email protected] Text & photography Contributors Marco Renda, Ændrew Rininsland, Ivan Art, Michelle Rainey, Otto Snow, PFlover, Jef Tek, Shantibaba, Jerry B., Soma, Jay Generation, Harry Resin, Dr Dog, Chris Thompson, Jeremy Norrie, Keith Fagin, John (Shiva), Lara Lesack, Richard Owl Mirror, Suggarpaw, British Hempire, Jackie Sutton, Salvatore Messina HD., David B. Allen M.D., Hashmasta-Kut, Ale Keppel, Gregorio “Goyo” Fernandez Cover Pic `Mr Nice Critical Mass flower at 6 weeks` by Gregorio Fernandez “Goyo” for Mr. Nice Seedbank Submissions [email protected] Treating Yourself 250 The East Mall, P.O. Box 36531 Etobicoke, Ontario M9B 3Y8 Canada T: + 416 620 1951 F: +416 620 0698 Printed in Canada 4 - Treating Yourself, Issue 18- 2009 TY18:Layout 1 17/08/09 16:06 Pagina 5 Marco’s Editorial Well I have to say issue number 17 certainly caused a lot of controversy, especially surrounding the Dr Frankenbeanstien article. Both Sam The Skunkman and Ed Rosenthal contacted me regarding this. I offered them both the chance to rebut what was published, but they declined to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Drink Specials
    hat year did this week’s newspaper flag come from See page March 18, 2015 Vol. 50, Issue 9 www.endeavouronline.ca Tap out! Tim Tamaki and Jared Kilkenny spar at the Canadian Martial Arts Centre at a recent belt ceremony. The pair completed and received their blue belts. Photo by Craig Kamba INDEX I STS I News ............................................................................P2 The first ever uman oosball The ittle ragons the up oin our an age on acebook ditorial .......................................................................P4 Tournament hits ethbridge and coming fighters Search ndeavour ewspaper ife ................................................................................P7 ollow us on Twitter for breaking news Sports ....................................................................... and what’s going on in our newsroom PAGE 8 Search ndeavour DRINK SPECIALS DINE IN • TAKE OUT • DELIVERY SUNDAY • $3 PAPER BAG BEER MONDAY • $8 HERO BEER WEDNESDAY • DISCOUNTED SEASONAL BEER THURSDAY • HALF-PRICED BOTTLED WINE 316 - 11 Street South • 403 - 331 - 2222 www.twoguyspizza.ca PIZZA • BEER • WINE 2 • Wednesday, March 18, 2015 NEWS ot rohet shes legaliaon Reefer smart Some “kushy” stats on Canada and cannabis industry Number of grow operations: 215,000 Number of people employed in grow operations: 500,000 Annual production: 2.6 million kg Annual Canadian consumption: 770,000 kg. Amount of production consumed in Canada: 30 per cent Youth Average age of introduction to marijuana: 15 years old Number of people aged 12 - 17 who use daily: 225, 005 Photo by Mercedes Fawns Marc Emery speaks about the need of legalization at the Owl on Saturday March 14, 2015. MERCEE AN that in his experience, even members [email protected] of other political parties want to see the drug legalized in order to focus on bigger He got up on to the stage under the problems.
    [Show full text]
  • J-: I' }
    o o • 0 o • J:..* i J-: I' } H 4 foO<:O' Reamy. ReO THE PRINCIPLE OF POT Extradition of 'Prince of Pot' Marc Emery Confronts Us With a Moral Obligation... COMMENTARY, by Robert Metz - It's called The Principle Of Pot and it's a must-see on line at www.YouTube.com/paulmckeever where the 4-hour-plus docu­ mentary continues to break records --- and new ground --­ in ways that never fail to surprise me. If pot's not your thing, or even if it is, don't let the title of this amazing documentary mislead you. Yes, it is about Marc Emery, with its title inspired by his designation as the Prince of Pot; and yes, you will learn about Emery's impact on the issue of cannabis legalization in Canada, in the United States, and around the world. But this documen­ tary pushes principle, not pot, and the historic story it tells is an on-going drama. Remarkably, in the midst of these two independently emotional and controversial subjects (being Emery himself and pot legalization), each competing for the viewer's full attention, a major theme that nevertheless surfaces in the Principle Of Pot is the greatest story never told: an early Above: Marc Emery bids a tearful farewell as he turns himself in to Canadian authorities for extradition to the United States. history of the Freedom Party of Ontario and its docu­ mented and demonstrable effect upon Ontario politics. "The Prince Of Pot••. " Most interesting for those on the right, the Principle of Pot also illustrates how Freedom Party's philosophy dif­ EMERY EXTRADITED fers from that of two groups most often seen, mistakenly, as having similar philosophies and political policies: Conser­ VANCOUVER - May 10, 2010 - After being advised that vatives and Libertarians.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 100 Women of Weed Carolyn "Mountain Girl" Adams
    Top 100 Women of Weed Carolyn "Mountain Girl" Adams - ex-wife of Jerry Garcia Rebecca Ambrose - Vancouver Seed Bank Elena Basescu - Romanian President's daughter Drew Barrymore - actress Lynn Belle-Isle - Canadian AIDS Society Joan Bello - author of The Benefits of Marijuana Sarah Bergeron - activist Hilary Black - BC Compassion Club Society Natalie Bouchard - activist Bong Pixie - Toronto Hash Mob Dr. Susan Boyd - author Sarah Cannon - activist Rielle Capler - Canadians for Safe Access Tamara Cartwright - Southern Alberta Cannabis Club Danni Cherish - activist Loretta Clark - activist Shelby Chong - comedienne, wife of Tommy Chong Valerie Corral - WAMM Jessica Corry - attorney Cathy Couch – activist Adrianne Curry - model Joy Davies - City Councilor, Grand Forks, B.C. Libby Davies - member of Canadian Parliament Dragonfly de la Luz - writer Dora Dempster - Vancouver Medicinal Cannabis Cameron Diaz - actress Sarah Diesel - Oaksterdam University Barbara Douglas - federal medical-cannabis patient Melanie Dreher - editor Ann Druyan - NORML board member, wife of Carl Sagan Barabara Ehrenreich - NORML advisory board member, author Jodi Emery - Cannabis Culture, wife of Marc Emery Eva Ends - SAFER Melissa Etheridge - musician Anna Faris - actress Debbie Fagin - Calgary 420 Vycki Fleming - activist Megan Fox - actress Toni Fox - activist Dr. Esther Fride - scientist (RIP) Ann Genovy - activist Debby Goldsberry - Berkeley Patients Group Crystal Guess - activist Shirley Halperin - author of Pot Culture Deb Harper - DrugSense Hemptress December
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicting Narratives on the 26 May 2016 Toronto Police Raid on Cannabis Shops
    Thaddeus Müller University of Lancaster, UK Cannabis, Moral Entrepreneurship, and Stigma: Conflicting Narratives on the 26 May 2016 Toronto Police Raid on Cannabis Shops DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.10 Abstract On May 26, 2016, the police raided 43 cannabis dispensaries in Toronto, Canada, making 90 arrests. This article aims to describe the narrative of the responsible state agencies concerning the police raid and compare it to the narrative of those who opposed it, such as activists, as well as consumers and sellers of cannabis. While such concepts as moral entrepreneur, moral panic, and moral crusade have traditionally been used to study those in power, I will employ them to explore both the state narrative and ways in which counterclaims-makers resisted it. In order to do so, I will further develop the concept of moral entrepreneurship and its characteristics by relating it to studies of moral panics and social problems. This article will be guided by the following question: How did each party socially construct its cannabis narrative, and in what way can we use the concept of moral entrepreneurship to describe and analyze these narratives as social constructions? I have investigated the media coverage of the raid and ethno- graphically studied shops in Toronto in order to study the narratives. My findings show that both parties used a factual neutral style, as well as a dramatizing style. The later includes such typical crusading strategies as constructing victims and villains and presenting the image of a dystopian social world. In order to explain the use of these strategies, we will relate them to the shifting wider social and historical context and to the symbolic connotation of cannabis shops in Toronto in particular and in Canada as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Jodie Emery, and I Would Like to Respectfully Submit This Brief Regarding Bill C-45, the “Cannabis Act”
    FROM THE DESK OF JODIE J. EMERY August 17, 2017 House of Commons Standing Committee on Health House of Commons Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6 Canada To the Honourable Members of Parliament and Standing Committee on Health Chair Bill Casey, Vice Chair Don Davies, Vice Chair Len Webber, and fellow Standing Committee on Health colleagues, My name is Jodie Emery, and I would like to respectfully submit this brief regarding Bill C-45, the “Cannabis Act”. My qualifications to comment on this significant reform include the following: - I have more than thirteen years of devoted experience researching, writing about and advocating for cannabis and legalization as a magazine editor, business owner, media spokesperson and political candidate - I have spoken at numerous cannabis conferences and events across Canada, the United States and abroad - In 2010, I campaigned for California’s cannabis legalization Proposition 19 - In 2011, I testified at the Washington State legislature Ways and Means Committee for legalization bill 1550 - In 2012, I was an official endorser for Washington State’s successful cannabis legalization Initiative 502 - In 2012, I called for legalization alongside former B.C. Attorney General Geoffrey Plant, former U.S. District Attorney John McKay and Dr. Evan Wood of the Centre for Excellence in HIV & AIDS as part of our “Stop The Violence” cannabis legalization campaign - In 2014 and 2015, I was a Liberal Party of Canada nomination candidate in Vancouver-East with a high-profile legalization platform and campaign - In February 2016, I spoke
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Provincial Elections in British Columbia
    Canadian Political Science Review 4(2-3) June-September 2010 Completing the ‘Three-Peat’: Recent Provincial Elections in British Columbia Patrick J. Smith (Institute of Governance Studies, Simon Fraser University)1 Abstract British Columbia held its 39th General Election on May 12, 2009. It produced a result very close to the previous election in May, 2005, with Gordon Campbell’s Liberal Government returned with 48% of the popular vote and 49 of 85 seats (or 57.6% of the MLA’s) in an expanded British Columbia legislature. For Gordon Campbell, his victory to a third term made him only the fourth Premier in British Columbia to be elected for a third term, and the first since William Bennett and the Socreds from the mid 1970’s to the mid 1980’s. Until Gordon Campbell, all First Ministers since 1986 had served no more than one term, some considerably less. (VanderZalm, Johnston, Harcourt, Clark, Miller and Dosanjh (between 1986 and 2001 – an average of 2.5 years each), During this decade and a half of electoral turmoil, British Columbia became the first Canadian jurisdiction with Recall and Initiative legislation, as well as adding a separate Referendum Act. To understand the 2009 result, having an idea of its prelude is helpful. That prelude included two General Elections – in 1996 and 2001 which were controversial and resulted in British Columbia’s shift to fixed election dates for 2005 and 2009. The latter two elections both also included a referendum on electoral reform. Both of these failed. Prelude: 1996 and 2001 – The Perfect Electoral Storm The British Columbia General Elections of 1996 and 2001 represented a perfect political storm for the province; they also represent essential reading for anyone seeking to understand recent BC matters political.
    [Show full text]