IRSN Annual Report 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IRSN Annual Report 2008 2008 Annual Report Contents ORGANIZATION ....................................... 01 Studies on site environments ........................... 58 Editorial by Agnès BUZYN, Chairperson, Transfer and behavior of radioactive substances in the environment ........................ 60 Board of Directors .............................................. 02 Editorial by Jacques REPUSSARD, Radiation protection in the workplace ............ 61 Director General ................................................. 04 Interview with Michel BRIÈRE, CHALLENGE 4: Security of nuclear Deputy Director General in Charge of facilities and materials .................................... 64 Defense-related Missions .................................. 06 Protection and inspection of Activity in 2008: key figures ............................. 07 nuclear and sensitive materials ........................ 64 Panorama of 2008 .............................................. 08 International inspections in a non-proliferation context .............................. 66 Major reports published in 2008 ..................... 11 Protection against malicious acts .................... 67 IRSN in short ....................................................... 12 IRSN missions ..................................................... 13 CHALLENGE 5: Emergency response ............ 70 Organization chart ............................................. 15 National policy ................................................... 70 Board of Directors .............................................. 16 Steering Committee for the Nuclear Consolidation of emergency response organization ........................................................ 71 Defense Expertise Division ................................ 18 Developing tools ................................................. 72 The Scientific Council ........................................ 19 CHALLENGE 6: Effects of Chronic Exposure .. 74 SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK ................ 20 ENVIRHOM program ......................................... 74 Chronic risks ........................................................ 76 Strategy ............................................................... 22 Training ................................................................ 29 CHALLENGE 7: Protection in Lessons learned ................................................... 30 healthcare ........................................................... 78 Radiopathology .................................................. 78 ACTIVITIES .................................................... 32 Assessments in the medical field ..................... 78 CHALLENGE 1: Safety at existing facilities ... 34 Monitoring facilities and transport .................. 34 ENSURING EFFICIENCY ......................... 80 Fuel safety ........................................................... 41 Quality ................................................................. 82 Fire protection .................................................... 43 Hygiene, safety, and Severe accidents ................................................. 44 environmental protection ................................. 83 Naturally-occuring hazards ............................... 47 Scientific and technical excellence .................. 84 About defense ..................................................... 49 Human resources ................................................ 86 Communications ................................................ 88 CHALLENGE 2: Conducting assessments on future facilities ................................................... 52 Glossary .............................................................. 90 Reactors ............................................................... 52 Geological repositories for radioactive waste .. 54 CHALLENGE 3: Environmental and Financial Report at the end of the Annual population exposure ........................................ 56 Report Environmental exposure .................................... 56 IRSN site details (on flap) 2008 Annual Report EDITORIAL The Institute will assert its vital role as a world- class expert in nuclear assessment In 2008 the Board of Directors was renewed. The board members were chosen to comply Our mission with requirements in our founding charter, resulting in a constructive balance between is based on a unique the ministries directly involved in IRSN’s and diversified quest mission (including the supervisory minis- tries), nuclear safety authorities, Institute for quality that staff representatives, advisory members, including international scientific experts, makes IRSN one and the President of the National Associa- of a kind. tion of Local Information Commissions. By choosing a physician to chair the IRSN Board, public authorities have signaled their inten- tion to reinforce a nuclear culture based on safety in the medical environment, while clearly emphasizing that the essence of the Institute is to serve the public by protecting people from the (harmful) effects of ionizing radiation. The annual report gives IRSN personnel the opportunity to re- view the year’s accomplishments The year 2008 was a particularly busy one for the Institute, especially due to a few together and reflect on the image minor incidents that had no impact on public that we, as a community, project to health, but sparked widespread media cov- those outside our organization. erage, leaving their mark on our collective consciousness. This situation of living with a constantly perceived, and real, risk means we must be extremely vigilant. To begin, we must be vigilant in our core activity: in the various emergency situa- tions that occurred in the summer of 2008, the Institute demonstrated its ability to act reliably as the legitimate national expert, 2 ORGANIZATION _ Annual Report IRSN 2008 ION at NIZ A RG The essence of the Institute’s mission O is to serve the public by protecting people from the effects of ionizing radiation. LOOK T through efficient internal organization and As a public service institution, we have a Our challenge for the future, in a context ND OU the professionalism of its staff. In an era of major role to play. In this respect, the Insti- of high media visibility open to contrasting A renewed interest for the nuclear sector on tute can call on several instruments to serve viewpoints, is first and foremost to affirm RY A both the national and international scene this educational objective, such as its analysis the Institute’s image as a vital world-class and the ensuing diversification of parties reports, which are very complete, precise, expert in nuclear safety and radiation pro- UMM S involved, IRSN must continue to promote a and appropriate for widespread publication, tection, an organization that strives to be nuclear culture based on safety, conducting now appearing as Internet links in the annual responsive, rigorous, impartial, proactive and its expert mission with uncompromising dis- report. The Charter for Openness to Society transparent. The Board of Directors will be cipline, as pressure builds on our personnel. enacted this year should also contribute to vigilant in any decisions that could affect We must therefore endeavor to constantly discussion and dialogue between the various the public service mission of the Institute. It refresh our in-house skills and renew our stakeholders and represents a very construc- will continue to target our goal, essential for staff members, keeping in mind the more tive step in the right direction towards open- society as a whole, to protect people and the attractive sources, especially universities, but ness and transparency in public relations. environment, the commitment that unites also encouraging knowledge-sharing within In parallel, the new governance structure each and every member of IRSN personnel. our ranks. We also need to reflect together initiated by our supervisory ministries, the on how to reorganize our land and building Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection assets, an issue to be confronted in the next Research Policy Committee, aims to explain few years, as we aim to preserve a coherent our research strategy and invites society to TIES I balance between scientific facilities and as- take part in this reflection on the long-term V I T sessment resources in the relevant depart- prospects of research in nuclear safety and C ments, while keeping in mind the efforts this radiation protection. A will require from our staff members. The conclusions of this multidiscipline com- mittee will be taken into consideration as the Agnès BUZYN Vigilant as well in how we communicate, Institute prepares its future strategy plans. Board of Directors Chairperson staying aware of the image we create in the public eye. The Transparency Act states that the various nuclear stakeholders must In conclusion, our mission is based on a provide the public with sufficient information unique and diversified quest for quality on nuclear safety and radiation protection that makes IRSN one of a kind. This pursuit so that people are able to assess the risks must be supported both inside and outside involved. This represents a tremendous step the Institute, and the annual report is one way forward for us as citizens. Transparency of making it known to all of our partners. also implies making information not only accessible, but also comprehensible, through explanation and instruction. ENSURING EFFICIENCY Annual Report IRSN 2008 _ ORGANIZATION 3 EDITORIAL IRSN’s sole ambition is to advance the cause of nuclear
Recommended publications
  • Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR), a High-Performance Material Test Reactor in Cadarache, France
    The Swedish-French collaboration on the research reactors ASTRID & JHR Prof. Christophe Demazière Chalmers University of Technology Department of Applied Physics Division of Nuclear Engineering [email protected] Background − the ESS project • ESS: European Spallation Source – a European Union facility. • Will be built in Lund. • Participation of France is formalized in a contract between France and Sweden. • Sweden has to spend 400 MSEK on joint research in subjects relevant to France (energy and environment). • Out of this, 100 MSEK is devoted to fission-based nuclear energy. Background – the European research program • Vision: Sustainable Nuclear Energy Technology Platform (SNETP). • Planned facilities: – Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR), a high-performance material test reactor in Cadarache, France. Start of operation: 2014. – MYRRHA facility in Mol, Belgium, a fast spectrum irradiation facility working as an ADS. Start of operation: ca. 2023. – ASTRID (Advanced Sodium Technological Reactor for Industrial Demonstration), a prototype Gen-IV sodium-cooled fast reactor to be built in France. Start of operation: ca. 2020. – VHTR, a first-of-a kind Very High Temperature Reactor for, among others, hydrogen production. VR Multi-project Grant in Nuclear Energy Research • 3 multi-grant projects granted by the Swedish Research Council in the spring of 2012 (projects in collaboration with CEA, France – French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission): – DEMO-JHR (coordinator: Prof. Christophe Demazière, Chalmers): 3 PhD projects. – ASTRID
    [Show full text]
  • The Jules Horowitz Reactor Project, a Driver for Revival of the Research Reactor Community
    THE JULES HOROWITZ REACTOR PROJECT, A DRIVER FOR REVIVAL OF THE RESEARCH REACTOR COMMUNITY P. PERE, C. CAVAILLER, C. PASCAL AREVA TA CEA Cadarache - Etablissement d'AREVA TA - Chantier RJH - MOE - BV2 - BP n° 9 – 13115 Saint Paul lez Durance - France CS 50497 - 1100, rue JR Gauthier de la Lauzière, 13593 Aix en Provence cedex 3 – France ABSTRACT The first concrete of the nuclear island for the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR) was poured at the end of July 2009 and construction is ongoing. The JHR is the largest new platform for irradiation experiments supporting Generation II and III reactors, Generation IV technologies, and radioisotope production. This facility, composed of a unique grouping of workshops, hot cells and hot laboratories together with a first -rate MTR research reactor, will ensure that the process, from preparations for irradiation experiments through post-irradiation non-destructive examination, is completed expediently, efficiently and, of course, safely. In addition to the performance requirements to be met in terms of neutron fluxes on the samples (5x1014 n.cm-2/sec-1 E> 1 MeV in core and 3,6x1014 n.cm-2/sec-1 E<0.625 eV in the reflector) and the JHR’s considerable irradiation capabilities (more than 20 experiments and one-tenth of irradiation area for simultaneous radioisotope production), the JHR is the first MTR to be built since the end of the 1960s, making this an especially challenging project. The presentation will provide an overview of the reactor, hot cells and laboratories and an outline of the key milestones in the project schedule, including initial criticality in early 2014 and radioisotope production in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Réacteurs Expérimentaux Et Leur Contrôle ▼ Les Réacteurs Expérimentaux Et Leur Contrôle Experimental Reactors and Their Regulation
    Dossier: Les réacteurs expérimentaux et leur contrôle ▼ Les réacteurs expérimentaux et leur contrôle Experimental reactors and their regulation Chargement de la cuve du réacteur à haut flux (RHF). 2 Dossier: Les réacteurs expérimentaux et leur contrôle ▼ Éditorial 4 Foreword Le contrôle des réacteurs expérimentaux : la démarche de l’Autorité de sûreté nucléaire 5 Experimental reactor regulation: the Nuclear Safety Authority’s approach LE RÔLE DES RÉACTEURS EXPÉRIMENTAUX Le poids des réacteurs expérimentaux dans les programmes de recherche : l’exemple de l’énergie nucléaire 15 The importance of experimental reactors for research programs: The example of nuclear energy Les réacteurs expérimentaux 20 The experimental nuclear reactors La contribution des réacteurs d’expérimentation aux recherches sur la sûreté 27 Contribution of research reactors to the programmes for research and technological development on the safety LES SPÉCIFICITÉS DU CONTRÔLE DES RÉACTEURS EXPÉRIMENTAUX La spécificité du contrôle des réacteurs expérimentaux: le point de vue de l’inspecteur de l’ASN 35 The specific nature of experimental reactor regulation: the viewpoint of ASN’s inspectors La sûreté des réacteurs de recherche vue du Groupe permanent réacteurs 41 Research reactor safety from the advisory committee for nuclear reactors standpoint Les facteurs organisationnels et humains et la sûreté des réacteurs d’expérimentation 47 The human factors and the safety of experimentation reactors Les réexamens de sûreté des réacteurs d’expérimentation en France 52 Periodic safety review management for french research reactors CONCILIER RECHERCHE ET SÛRETÉ: LES RÉPONSES DES EXPLOITANTS ET DES CONCEPTEURS Un enjeu majeur: concilier recherche et sûreté. Le point de vue du CEA 58 A major issue: reconciling research and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chinese Graphic Design History in Greater China Since 1979 Wendy Siuyi Wong
    Detachment and Unification: A Chinese Graphic Design History in Greater China Since 1979 Wendy Siuyi Wong The illustrations are identified by the name of Introduction designer, the client or title of the work, the The history of modern Chinese design is virtually unknown due to design category, and the year. The title of the its relatively late development compared to design in the West. Not work is the author’s own title, if an official until recent decades, since the opening up of China in 1979, has a name is cannot found. All woks reprinted with unifying Chinese graphic design history started to form. This was permission of the designer. assisted by China’s rapid economic development and interactions with Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macau; which, together with main- land China, make up the Greater China region. Traditionally, in academic practice, it was common to separate the investigation of these individual Chinese societies. Matthew Turner, one of the few Western historians to examine Chinese design, notes that the history of Hong Kong design prior to the 1960s “simply was believed not to 1 2 1 Matthew Turner, “Early Modern Design in exist.” Chinese-trained design scholar Shou Zhi Wong emphasizes Hong Kong” in Dennis P. Doordan, ed., that there has been very little written about modern design in main- Design History: An Anthology land China, because design activity under the communists before (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995), 212. This the start of the Open Door Policy in 1979 was mostly in the service article was first published in Design of party propaganda.3 Both Turner and Wang, as well as Scott Issues, 6:1 (Fall 1989): 79–91; also Matthew Turner, “Development and Minick and Jiao Ping, published their works on Chinese design Transformations in the Discourse of history before a number of key economic and political changes in Design in Hong Kong” in Rajeshwari China and Hong Kong took place.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear France Abroad History, Status and Prospects of French Nuclear Activities in Foreign Countries
    Mycle Schneider Consulting Independent Analysis on Energy and Nuclear Policy 45, allée des deux cèdres Tél: 01 69 83 23 79 91210 Draveil (Paris) Fax: 01 69 40 98 75 France e-mail: [email protected] Nuclear France Abroad History, Status and Prospects of French Nuclear Activities in Foreign Countries Mycle Schneider International Consultant on Energy and Nuclear Policy Paris, May 2009 This research was carried out with the support of The Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI) in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (www.cigionline.org) V5 About the Author Mycle Schneider works as independent international energy nuclear policy consultant. Between 1983 and April 2003 Mycle Schneider was executive director of the energy information service WISE-Paris. Since 2000 he has been an advisor to the German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Reactor Safety. Since 2004 he has also been in charge of the Environment and Energy Strategies Lecture of the International Master of Science for Project Management for Environmental and Energy Engineering at the French Ecole des Mines in Nantes, France. In 2007 he was appointed as a member of the International Panel on Fissile Materials (IPFM), based at Princeton University, USA (www.fissilematerials.org). In 2006-2007 Mycle Schneider was part of a consultants’ consortium that assessed nuclear decommissioning and waste management funding issues on behalf of the European Commission. In 2005 he was appointed as nuclear security specialist to advise the UK Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM). Mycle Schneider has given evidence and held briefings at Parliaments in Australia, Belgium, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Switzerland, UK and at the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jules Horowitz Reactor Core and Cooling System Design
    The Jules Horowitz Reactor core and cooling system design M. Boyard*, JM. Cherel**, C. Pascal*, B. Guigon*** * AREVA-Technicatome, 1100 rue Jean René Guillibert Gautier de la Lauzière 13100 Aix en Provence, FRANCE ** AREVA-Framatome-ANP, 9-10 rue Juliette Récamier 69006 Lyon, FRANCE *** Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance cedex, FRANCE ABSTRACT The CEA (Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique) is planning to build a new MTR called the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR). JHR at Cadarache will become by 2014 and for decades a major research infrastructure in Europe for supporting existing power plants operation and lifetime extension as well as future reactor developments [1]. AREVA (Technicatome and Framatome- ANP) and EDF are performing the design studies. The JHR will be a tank pool type reactor using light water as coolant and moderator. The reactor has been designed to provide a neutron flux strong enough to carry out irradiation relevant for generations 2, 3 and 4 power plants: flexibility and adaptability, high neutron flux, instrumented experiments, loops to reproduce environments representatives of the different power plant technologies . Updated safety requirements and LEU fuel elements have been taken into account in the design of this high flux reactor. This paper presents the guidelines for the design of the main items, the various options considered and the choices made at the end of the detailed studies phase regarding: − Core shape, − Fuel element and core pitch, − Reflector and core-reflector interface, − Normal and emergency cooling systems, − Reactivity control system. MAIN OBJECTIVES OF THE REACTOR The “Jules Horowitz Reactor” (JHR) will be a structuring infrastructure of the European research area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Jules Horowitz Material Testing Reactor: an Opportunity for Developing International Collaborations on a Major European Irradiation Infrastructure
    The Future Jules Horowitz Material Testing Reactor: An Opportunity for Developing International Collaborations on a Major European Irradiation Infrastructure D. Parrat1, G. Bignan2, B. Maugard2, C. Gonnier2, C. Blandin2 1 CEA, DEN, DEC, Fuel Research Department, Cadarache, France 2 CEA, DEN, DER, Reactor Studies Departmen t, Cadarache, France Abstract early their needs, thanks to either participation to the JHR Consortium, or to international programs or through bilateral collaborations. Development process of a fuel product or a nu- clear material before using at an industrial scale A general presentation of this research infra- in a power reactor ranges from characterization structure and associated experimental capabil- th of the material itself under neutronic fl ux up to its ity has been made at the 9 WWER Fuel Perfor- qualifi cation in accidental conditions. Irradiations mance Meeting in 2011. Current paper updates in in Material Testing Reactors (MTRs) are in practice a fi rst part the facility building status and the cur- the basis of the whole process, in complement of rent design work carried out on irradiation hosting prediction capabilities gained by modelling. Dedi- systems for nuclear materials and nuclear fuels cated experimental reactors play also an impor- and on non-destructive examination benches. tant complementary role for some specifi c integral Then expected main performances are reviewed tests (e.g. RIA tests). Irradiations of precursors in and collaborations set up around each study are power reactors are often limited to products which also underlined, as they often correspond to an present a slight design evolution compare to the “in-kind” contribution of a Consortium member.
    [Show full text]
  • Théâtre De L'arlequin Concours D'affiche : L'arlequin Théâtre Ouvert
    Concours d’affiche : l’Arlequin théâtre ouvert. Le théâtre de l’Arlequin va ouvrir ses portes à l’automne 2008. Il est une institution de l’agglomération du Val-d’Orge dans la banlieue sud de Paris. Sa direction a été confiée à BlonBa, structure artistique du Mali également bien implantée en France. Ouvrir le théâtre à tous : le projet de l’Arlequin est tout entier axé autour de l’ouverture du théâ- tre au plus vaste public. En Occident, cet art est en effet souvent vécu comme intimidant, réservé aux élites cultivées. Le théâtre de l’Arlequin travaillera à désintimider des publics potentiels qui « ne se sentent pas chez eux » au théâtre et souvent s’en excluent d’eux-mêmes. La personnalité de l’Arlequin consistera dans l’invention de médiations originales entre les habitants du Val-d’Orge et la création contemporaine ainsi que le développement de liens nouveaux entre le public et la vie artistique : réunions d’information- formation, rencontre avec les associations, une vraie place aux pratiques amateurs et une confrontation de la diversité des expériences. Pas d’uniformité graphique : la communication graphique de l’Arlequin ne visera pas à imposer « une » image de l’institution, mais plutôt à montrer la diversité des sensibilités et des imaginaires qui conduisent à l’art. Nous avons donc souhaité mettre en concours, avec des écoles de graphisme de Belgique, de Chine, de France, d’Italie, de Pologne, du Portugal et de République Tchèque, des propositions diverses autour du projet global de l’Arlequin. Il s’agit de faire une proposition d’affi- che sur le thème de l’ouverture de l’art au plus grand nombre.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Technologies for Sustainable Development
    Nuclear Technologies for Sustainable Development Martin Ruščák September 13, 2017 WHY… to secure nuclear knowledge? Safety and longevity of current operation Sustainable power supply for the 21st century It´s about carbon…. 1 Shares of different technologies / 2050 2DS scenario 2 WHAT… do we need? Critical mass of engineers Demanding tasks Superb technical competencies 3 Knowledge Infrastructure in Nuclear Technologies in the Czech Republic / Czechoslovakia 2x VVER 1000 Temelín A-1 Ability to build 4x VVER 440 Dukovany & operate RPV Interim storages of Steam gen Piping spent fuel Regulation SONS Intermediate storage RR VVR-1 RR LVR-15 Research SUSEN RR LR-0 Inst Nucl Ph UJV privatized Research Centre Education Nuclear technologies at other universities Nuclear faculty 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 1993 4 Czechoslovakia Czech Rep. The Czech Republic: Research Related Assets People Since 1955 four generations of nuclear engineers: Pioneers of 50/60s, Power stations builders of 70s/80s, Operators of 90s/00s, New technologists of 2000+ High public support High expertise in most of nuclear technology fields Knowledge R&D related to the current NPPs: Nuclear safety – deterministic & probabilistic, component integrity, back end of fuel cycle, engineering R&D related to Generation IV R&D related to fusion technologies 5 The Czech Republic: Research Related Assets Infrastructure Research reactors (LVR-15 & LR-0 in Řež, VR-0 at the university) Hot cells Loops Material research labs Major knowledge-based Institutions UJV (Nuclear Research
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Dossier De Presse Lizá Ramalho & Artur Rebelo / R2
    Dossier de presse Lizá Ramalho & Artur Rebelo / R2 2 Biographie 3 Approche 4 Projets images www.r2design.pt 18 Citations R2 / 21 Articles / Textes publiés sur R2 22 La 3ème dimension de R2 (ou comment la surface aime le volume), Paulo Cunha e Silva 24 Studio R2 : Pionniers du Renouveau, Clara Debailly Lizá Ramalho & Artur Rebelo 26 Breath and Vision, Susanne Schaller 27 [(Life × 2) + 1] 2, Astrid Stravo Dossier de presse 32 Seléction de prix, expositions et articles / éditions de R2 38 Contacts 1 Biographie Lizá Défossez Ramalho (1971, Troyes, France) et Artur Rebelo (1971, Porto, Portugal), diplômés en Design de Communication de la Faculté des Beaux Arts de l’Université de Porto et titulaires d’une maîtrise en Recherche Design de la Faculté des Beaux Arts de l’Université de Barcelone, ont ouvert en 1995, l’atelier R2, basé à Porto. Depuis une vingtaine d’années, R2 collabore avec les institutions culturelles, les artistes, les architectes sur des projets très diversifiés pour la réalisation d’identités visuelles, design éditorial, affiches, design d’expositions, projets de signalétiques et de web et de motion… Un www.r2design.pt parcours de prédilection : ils sont aussi commissaires d’exposition, éditeurs de livres, intervenants de l’espace public avec des installations R2 / propres. Artur Rebelo, détenteur d’un doctorat en Art Contemporain, est aussi chargé de cours à la Faculté des Sciences et Technologie de l’Université de Coimbra, où Lizá Ramalho a également enseigné jusqu’en 2013. Avec une bourse de la Fondation pour la Science et la Technologie, elle finalise actuellement une thèse de doctorat sur l’identité visuelle des Musées d’Art Contemporain, pour la Faculté des Beaux Arts de l’Université de Barcelone.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Enriched Uranium from France ITC Sunset Review Hearing
    Low Enriched Uranium From France ITC Sunset Review Hearing Daniel W. Klett Capital Trade Incorporated September 10, 2013 AREVA Presence in the U.S. Market is Significant AREVA's U.S. Market Share 25% 20% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Prehearing Staff Report at Table 11-10. Prepared by Capital Trade, Inc. Centrifuge Enrichment Is Capital Intensive and but Capacity can be Added Incrementally • "With centrifuge technology it is easy to add capacity with modular expansion, but it is inflexible and best run at full capacity with low operating cost." -Uranium Enrichment, World Nuclear Association (updated July 2013). • "While gaseous diffusion plants have the advantage of being less capital intensive than gaseous centrifuge plants, there appear to be a number of important advantages of the gaseous centrifuge facilities that render them technologically superior to the gas diffusion facilities, especially the more up-to-date centrifuge technologies. These include lower electrical costs, higher capacity utilization rates, and the ability to incrementally add gaseous centrifuge capacity based on market needs/' - Prehearing Staff Report at IV-11. Prepared by Capital Trade, Inc. AREVA's Georges Besse II Plant Will Outstrip Its Georges Besse I (Eurodif) Plant's Production by 2014 Enrichment: controlled technology transition EURODIF GBII Sales out of Inventories End of the legacy contract with EDF (2011-2012) Eurodif Georges BesseI PRODUCTION (SWUs) June 2012: Eurodif is shut down 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 A AREVA Overview - December 2012 p.106 Performance and objectives by BG ARE V A AREVA's Georges Besse II Plant Has Significant Capacity and the Ability to Expand That Capacity • "It will have a production capacity of 7.5 million SWU (Separative Work Units), which could be increased to 11 million SWU." - AREVA Press Release: Enrichment: Inauguration ofthe Georges Besse II Plant (December 14, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • The French Nuclear Dream: Promises for Disillusion
    The French nuclear dream: promises for disillusion Nuclear energy might be marginal on a world-wide scale, but see how successful it can be in France, from an economical, industrial or environmental perspective! In view of such benefits, why not follow the French path? The idea deserves consideration: what lies behind the repetitive vulgate of an industry selling its technical and economical success, claiming that it guarantees French energy independency, protects the climate, controls its waste and preserves the environment, that it is safe against terrorism, etc.? What is the reality of the French nuclear experience in terms of industrial policy, safety, proliferation, waste management or economy? This chapter explores, on each of these issues, the gap between the talks and the facts. Global Chance Nuclear Power: the great illusion 34 Overview The nuclear industry in France – An overview French scientists contributed to the main stages in the discovery of radioactivity and its properties. Right after the Second World War, the country embarked on a nuclear development programme – initially military and then civil. The nuclear industry’s organisation is still heavily based upon the structures created at this key period, even if their status has developed. The Commissariat à l’Énergie Atomique (CEA – Atomic Energy Commission), set up in 1946, was charged with overseeing the research and development, up to the industrial stage, of all the processes necessary for the military programme and subsequently for nuclear electricity generation, including the uranium extraction and fuel manufacture (upstream) stages and the management of spent fuel and waste (downstream). A branch of the public research body CEA was created to manage all its industrial activities, mainly through the Compagnie Générale des Matières Nucléaires (Cogema – General Company for Nuclear Materials), a private company set up in 1976.
    [Show full text]