Jazzletter 93023 November 1989 V01
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Gene Lees _ P.O. Box 240 Ojai, Calif. Jazzletter 93023 November 1989 V01. 8 NO. 1 1 A third hidden agenda is a persistent philistinism that sets Reviewer Reviewed him against writers like Ted Gioia, Edward Berger, Dan Morgenstem, Gene Lees, and myself, who attempt to relate the by GROVER SALES , development of jan to other art forms and to concurrent Stanley Dance’s" qualifications as a research specialist are political-social-racial movements. Dance has never troubled beyond question. For four decades his meticulous and affec- himself with such matters, which he views with suspicion and tionate books, interviews, articles, and liner notes on Ellington, overt hostility. - -C Hines, Basie, Henderson and the Swing Era made an essential His two-hundred-word dismissal of James Lincoln Collier’s contribution to the literature of jazz. ground-breaking monograph The Reception ofJazz in America: But the skills and virtues of a research specialist are not A New View never addressed the author’s painstaking "resea- .necessarily those of acritic. As book editor of the otherwise rches" (the quotation marks are Dance’s) but was restricted to commendable Jazz'I?mes Stanley Dance’s savage reviews of an ad hominem jeremiad: "another nasty piece of work by a serious and reflective books are irresponsib1e,iflippant, venge- writer rapidly painting himself into a corner." ful, mean-spirited and dishonest. Dance was not alone among established critics in reacting to The dishonesty stems from an elaborate hidden agenda. Collier’s careful docrirnentation in much the same way that Old Foremost is his conviction that bebop and most of "modem" Testament scholars recoiled from the revisionist discoveries of jazz that followed are abominable heresies that pollute the the Dead Sea Scrolls. Colliercasts doubt on the 'long-cher- mainstream of jazz. This quaint notion passed for conventional ished myth that jazz was only appreciated in England and wisdom nearly half a century ago when Parker and Gillespie Europe, and rarely in the United States. I have done my were carving out the frontiers of an avant-garde art music share, I confess, to perpetuate this in print and in the class- whose importance was seen by a few among the (then) room. Collier made me rethink it. The.Collier monograph is exclusively white brotherhood of jazz critics: Leonard Feather, invaluable, among other reasons, for paying homage to three Barry Ulanov, Charles Delaunay. Slowly, surreptitiously, most forgotten American commentators writing perceptively about of the bebop-hating New Orleans revivalists, like the late Ralph jazz as early as the 192D’s: Carl Engle, R.D. Darrell, and Abbe J. Gleason, came around," but Dance remains adamant. Niles. When Jdzflimes reader Bernie Denhanr admonished Occasionally he forgets to conceal the agenda, as in pronounc- Dance to "criticize the work and not the worker," Dance called ing Johnny Hodges "the greatest alto -saxist in jazz, no bebop him a "Palo A_lto.wiseacre (who)-can take heart by reading the spoken here." Polled by Cash Box to select the ten best back cover of Collieifs Duke Ellington . Despite the fact records since 1960, he picked ten Ellington records. Trashing that practically everydjazz critic of repute dumped on the book" an article in Rutgers’ Annual Review of Jazz Studies, one of his (not true), "there he will see that the lay press’ adored it. sociological -whipping boys, Dance concludes "the piece . Given the ethics of the Reagan years and the rise to power of ‘ayhhelp boppers understand the mess they got into." the Woodstock generation, I don’t find that at all hard to ax, en reviewing writers who regard bebop and its offshoot understand.” modern jazz with favor, that is, the majority of jazz critics As one who despises the Reagans and deplores the aesthetics published today, Dance usually conceals this bias, shifting his of Woodstock, if not its politics, I can make no sense of this attack to spurious and trifling ground. eye-popping non sequitur unless Dance means to imply that Dance’s second hidden agenda is the hagiography of El- Collier is a right-winger, an inference that, as Collier’s friend lington. As the Duke’s Boswell, he assumes a sacerdotal and colleague, I know to be untrue. Gene Lees has often 4 interest in the man and his work that is both proprietary and observed that a right-wing bebopper, unlike the exclusively protective. He becomes choleric when writers suggest that the dixieland fan, seems as rare as a one-armed shortstop. Ellington symbiotic workshop reached its exalted peak with Dance’s bias against those who write about jazz from the the Blanton-Webster band of the early 1940s (hardly a minority vantage point of interdisciplinary studies in art, literature, view) or that Ellington’s latter-day hankering. for "respectability" classical music, and philosophy was flaunted in a hund- in the form of extended works and sacred concerts led him red-word dismissal of Ted Gioia’s The Imperfect An‘ as "a down an artistic garden path. Nor can Dance abide the thesis designed to impress a tutor by showing how widely . slightest inference that Ellington’s public concerts toward the the student has read. So there are references to Wagner, end tended to-be asttedious and predictable as Armstrong’s, Goethe, Keats, Nietzsche, Byron, Spengler, Cellini, Homer, often verging on embarrassment, with dreary reruns of Pretty Satie, Plato, Spencer, Sontag, Kant, Proust, on-and-on till the and the Wolf, Carney holding the endless note on Sophisticated gagging point is reached. But Gioia, at 31, is already teaching Lady, Gonsalves cranked up in the vain hope of repeating his jazz at Stanford(!)" Newport ’56 triumph. on Crescendo and jDiminuend0 in Blue, Gioia, who initiated Stanford’s program of jan studies not and Ellington’s perennial bid for a piece of the Rock action, at thirty-one but at age twenty, is also -an accomplished One More Time bellowed by the most degraded singers he pianist-composer in the Bill Evans vein, and the producer of could find. This is something everyone knows, but none of Quartet Records devoted to state-of-the-art recordings . of Ellington’s numerous hagiographers will admit. It’s considered contemporary jazz by young artists like himself deserving of bad form, even irreverent. wider recognition. You do not have to agree with every Copyright‘ ~ ~ ni < 1 '1"? _.;.:.:Z%€:»-r-ig-¢.§;;s':;<- > " s ‘ - . .1 -_-s»,it;-f iii '5' . N _.. - statement in Gioia’s The Imperfect An‘ to see it as an impor- album! I was faulted for omitting from my bibliography tant andambitious attempt to come to grips with the unique- Dance’s lifetime guru, the doctrinaire moldy-fig crow-jirni nessof jazz that demands far more than Dance’s back of the enthusiast Hugues Panassie, who, asserts Dance, “the greatest hand, and the ASCAP selection committee that gave Gioia’s jazz‘ musicians of his generation liked and respected." As book a coveted Deems Taylor Award apparently concur. Dance would say, "oh, no!" ~ I A further hidden agenda is Dance’s animosity toward that Dance at his most characteristically underhanded is revealed rarityiin jazz -- a genuine literary style, hardly surpris- in the following: g r ing in one given to pedestrian’ prose. _~He attacked the late "And if Ellington had ’little luck’ in urging Tricky Sam’s Otis Ferguson "who appears to have acquired something of a successors to recapture Tricky’s sotmd, one wwndersiwhether cult following among the literati since his death at Salerno in Sales really listened to what Lawrence Brown, Tyree Glenn, World War II." - Quentin Jackson and Booty Wood didiwith their plunger The Ferguson "cult? comprises people who treasure clean, mutes?" ' re" perceptive, and lively prose. In their thorough-writers’ manual, Aside from the questionable judgment of so much 0 Tile-Reader Over Your Shoulder, Robert Graves and Alan space to such quibbling esoterica in a brief review of an Hodge, lamenting the stylistic imperfections and ambiguities of admittedly brief introduction to jazz, Dance neglected to say Stephen Spender, J.B. Priestly, Cecil Day Lewis, I-LG. Wells, that I chose Tricky Sam as an example of aunique instrumen- J.M. Keynes, and Hemingway, among many others, heaped tal sound. Could Dance bi: suggesting that anyone conversant praise upon Ferguson’s 1941 review of the Spirits of Rhythm with Ellingtonia could not distinguish Tricky Sam from his as "good English in its unconventional way." It must be said many imitators at Ellington’s behest? that the Spirits of Rhythm were black, since Dance accused -- The aside, "one wonders whether Sales really listened" -- a the apt word in his context -- Ferguson of being "white-orien- recurrent motif in Danceland -- is peculiar since we were ted” because "he kept returning to Bix, whose playing seems to hardly‘ strangers when he wrote this review, We had. cor- havehada; his critical faculties . he also responded and talked frequently when I produced solo concerts Goodman and his band."- in the Bay Area for Earl Hines when Dance served as his Dance’s on The Essential Jazz Records: Vol. I - manager-hooker. Dance knew that my continuous involvement Ragtime to Swing by his fellow Brits Max Harrison, Charles with Ellington began with the Blanton-Webster of_th_e Fox and Eric Thackerwas a flagrantpiece of irresponsibility early forties. He knew I had produced in the ear.1y=1960s."a for which Ja_zzTimes publisher Ira Sabin must share the blame. weekly radio show devoted to Ellington. He made reference In the circumscribed world of jazz writing, it is common to my longtime involvement with jam in the following passage»,-I knowledge that Dance and Max Harrison have carried on a which also exposed his antipathy to bebop, replete with the corrosive personal vendetta for decades, and that neither implication thatl, as at pre-bopper, am guiltyof heresy: -"To overlooks the chance to shaft the other in print.