Properties of Pruned, Binary, Planar Fractal Trees

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Properties of Pruned, Binary, Planar Fractal Trees Properties of Pruned, Binary, Planar Fractal Trees Rita Gnizak Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fort Hays State University 1 Big whorls have little whorls, That feed on their velocity; And little whorls have lesser whorls, And so on to viscosity. Lewis F. Richardson 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Background 5 2.1 Fractal Trees . 5 2.2 The Canopy . 7 2.3 Space-filling Trees . 9 2.4 Hausdorff Dimension . 9 2.5 Pruned Trees . 10 3 Counting Forbidden Words 13 4 Calculating Dimension of Pruned Trees 15 5 Pruning Space-filling Trees 17 6 Further Study 23 7 Appendix 24 7.1 Appendix I: Mathematica Coding for Pruned Trees . 24 3 Abstract Symmetric, planar, binary branching trees have been extensively de- scribed by Benoit Mandelbrot and Michael Frame [7], however, little is known about the effects that pruning has on the properties of these trees. Investigation of self-contact, connectedness, fractal dimension, and the space-filling properties of pruned fractal trees has lead us to the creation of a new method for calculating fractal dimension of pruned trees as well as a proof that the space-filling property of the special 90◦ and 135◦ trees is lost when any finite sequence of a transformation is forbidden. 4 1 Introduction In 1957, Alan W. Watts in his book The Way of Zen wrote, The Tao is a certain kind of order, and this kind of order is not quite what we call order when we arrange everything geometrically in boxes, or in rows. That is a very crude kind of order, but when you look at a plant it is perfectly obvious that the plant has order. We recognize at once that it is not a mess, but it is not symmetrical and it is not geometrical looking. The plant looks like a Chinese drawing, because they appreciated this kind of non-symmetrical order so much that it became an integral aspect of their painting. In the Chinese language this is called li, and the character for li means the marking in jade. It also means the grain in wood and the fiber in muscle. We could say, too, that clouds have li, marble has li, the human body has li. We all recognize it, and the artist copies it whether he is a landscape painter, a portrait painter, an abstract painter, or a non-objective painter. They all are trying to express the essence of li. The interesting thing is, that although we all know what it is, there is no way of defining it. Mathematics now defines li through fractal geometry. Fractal geometry is a discipline in mathematics concerned with infinitely de- tailed, self-similar objects that lack a derivative. Benoit Mandelbrot developed the discipline from studies of chaos involving fluctuations of the stock market, turbulent motion of fluids, and the irregular shorelines of the English coast [4]. He defines a fractal as \a rough or fragmented geometric shape that can be split into parts, each of which is (at least approximately) a reduced-size copy of the whole." [6] As Mandelbrot's definition suggests, a fractal tree is a tree whose branches are each a smaller version of the whole tree. Since Mandelbrot coined the term fractal in 1975, he and Michael Frame have extensively studied the properties of these trees, proving theorems and conjecturing on properties of space-filling trees, canopy shapes, and conditions for self-contacting trees [7]. Pruned fractal trees are fractal trees in which particular branches are re- moved from the symmetric, planar version. Self-contact ratios, fractal dimen- sion, and connectedness are altered by the process of pruning. The implications of these effects on the properties of fractal trees must be investigated to further the understanding and applications of fractals. 2 Background 2.1 Fractal Trees A more rigorous definition of a symmetric, planar, binary, fractal tree is now described using two parameters, and a set of transformations in repetition. 5 Definition 1 Fractal Tree A fractal tree is denoted by T (θ; r), where r is the scaling ratio at each level and θ is the angle of rotation, both clock-wise and counter clock-wise, from the linear extension of the trunk. Figure 1: Construction of a Planar, Binary Fractal Tree Definition 2 Tree Transformations For a fractal tree T (θ; r), the corresponding affine transformations are fF1;F2g as follows. x cos θ − sin θ x 0 F = r + 1 y sin θ cos θ y 1 x cos θ sin θ x 0 F = r + 2 y − sin θ cos θ y 1 Note that the trunk, or initial condition, has a length of one. Definition 3 Iterated Function System An iterated function system (IFS) is a collection of contractive, affine transfor- mations. One application of the tree transformations will map the tip of the trunk to each of two branches, the left branch generated by F1 and the right generated by F2. The trunk is of length one for simplicity, so that these first two branches will have a length of r and the length of every branch to follow will be ri where i is the number of times the transformations have been applied, or the iteration. Note that to be considered an IFS by Definition 3, r must satisfy 0 < r < 1 so that contraction of the system is ensured. Notice also that the angle each branch is to be dropped from the linear extension of the trunk must lie within 6 (0; 180◦) to prevent collapse of the tree. Since little is known about asymmetric trees, only the effects of pruning on symmetric trees is explored. That is, the same ratio, r, and angle, θ, are used in both F and F . The result of eight 1 2 iterations of the tree transformations with r = p1 , and θ = 45◦ is seen in 2 Figure 2. Figure 2: T p1 ; 45◦ 2 2.2 The Canopy Definition 4 Address Given a fractal tree T (r; θ) having a branch generated by the following sequence of tree transformations, applied from left to right, 0 F ◦F ◦F ◦:::◦F a1 a2 a3 an 1 the address of the tip of the branch is the string of integers a1a2a3 : : : an for n 2 [1; 1) where aj 2 f1; 2g. Each branch tip is inherently addressed by the sequence of tree transforma- tions that generate it. Visually speaking, the address is the string of turns which consist of left, generated by F1 and denoted by a 1, and right, generated by F2 and denoted with a 2, that carry the viewer from the trunk of the fractal tree to the branch tip of discussion. It is important to notice that in Definition 4, the tree transformation Fa1 is the first transformation applied to the trunk, and Fan is the last transformation applied. This inversion is necessary for ease of reference when addressing branch tips arrived at after numerous or infinitely many iterations. Definition 5 Canopy The canopy of the fractal tree T (r; θ) is the attractor of the iterated function 7 system F1;F2. That is, the limit of the finite address via 0 lim Fa ◦Fa ◦Fa ◦ · · · ◦Fa n!1 1 2 3 n 1 Figure 3: The approximation of the canopy generated by the tree from Figure 2 Definition 6 Self Contact If two branches of a tree T (r; θ) intersect, the tree is said to be self-contacting. If only the tips of two distinct branches intersect, the tree is said to have tip-to-tip self-contact. The tree branches are not actually the fractal, they are only means by which one arrives at the fractal canopy. The canopy itself is the primary area of interest when studying fractals, and attention is especially paid to tip-to-tip, self-contacting trees. Since symmetric fractal trees are infinitely self-similar, one point of contact between two branches ensures infinitely many contact points among branch tips [5]. For a given angle θ, there is one ratio r which ensures self-contact of the binary branching planar tree, as seen in Figure 4 [7]. Figure 4: Relation between θ in degrees and the ratio r necessary for tip-to-tip self-contact [7]. 8 2.3 Space-filling Trees In planar, binary branching fractal trees, two special cases exist in which the canopy of the tree fills two-dimensional space [7]. The two peaks in Figure 4 correspond to these two trees, T (90◦; p1 ) and T (135◦; p1 ). These trees have 2 2 infinitely branched limits that fill a rectangle and triangle respectively. ◦ 1 Figure 5: The space-filling T (90 ; 2 ) tree shown at 11 iterations ◦ 1 Figure 6: The space-filling T (135 ; 2 ) tree shown at 15 iterations 2.4 Hausdorff Dimension Fractals are sets that are too complex to be described in Euclidean terms, which is why it is necessary to build trees that describe the relationship of each point to each of the other points in the canopy. A characteristic that aids in describing the complexity of these points, which is standard for many mathe- matical spaces, is the notion of dimension. Although there are many ways to calculate the dimension of a set, the Haus- dorff dimension (also known as the Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension) is ideal when studying fractals since it allows for non-integer dimensions, as are neces- sary for describing fractals, and it coincides with the more familiar integer di- mensions of well-behaved sets [1]. The Hausdorff Dimension is often called sim- ply fractal dimension because it distinguishes fractals from non-fractal shapes.
Recommended publications
  • Project-Team Virtual Plants Modeling Plant Morphogenesis from Genes To
    INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE EN INFORMATIQUE ET EN AUTOMATIQUE Project-Team Virtual Plants Modeling plant morphogenesis from genes to phenotype Sophia Antipolis THEME BIO c t i v it y ep o r t 2005 Table of contents 1. Team 1 2. Overall Objectives 2 2.1. Overall Objectives 2 3. Scientific Foundations 2 3.1. Analysis of structures resulting from meristem activity 2 3.2. Meristem functioning and development 3 3.3. A software platform for plant modeling 4 4. New Results 4 4.1. Analysis of structures resulting from meristem activity 4 4.1.1. Analysis of longitudinal count data and underdispersion 4 4.1.2. Growth synchronism between Aerial and Root Systems 4 4.1.3. Changes in branching structures within the whole plants 5 4.1.4. Growth components in trees 5 4.1.5. Markov switching models 5 4.1.6. Diagnostic tools for hidden Markovian models 5 4.1.7. Hidden Markov tree models for investigating physiological age within plants 6 4.1.8. Branching processes for plant development analysis 6 4.1.9. Self-similarity in plants 6 4.1.10. Reconstruction of plant foliage density from photographs 6 4.1.11. Fractal analysis of plant geometry 6 4.1.12. Light interception by canopy 7 4.1.13. Heritability of architectural traits 7 4.2. Meristem functioning and development 8 4.2.1. 3D surface reconstruction and cell lineage detection in shoot meristems 8 4.2.2. Simulation of auxin fluxes in the mersitem 8 4.2.3. Dynamic model of phyllotaxy based on auxin fluxes 8 4.2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction Into Ecological Modelling for Students, Teachers & Scientists
    Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics . Fred Jopp l Hauke Reuter l Broder Breckling Editors Modelling Complex Ecological Dynamics An Introduction into Ecological Modelling for Students, Teachers & Scientists Title Drawings by Melanie Trexler Foreword by Sven Erik Jørgensen & Donald L. DeAngelis Editors Dr. Fred Jopp Dr. Hauke Reuter Department of Biology Department of Ecological Modelling University of Miami Leibniz Center for Tropical Marine Ecology P.O. Box 249118 GmbH (ZMT) Coral Gables, FL 33124 Fahrenheitstraße 6 USA 28359 Bremen [email protected] Germany [email protected] Dr. Broder Breckling General and Theoretical Ecology Center for Environmental Research and Sustainable Technology (UFT) University of Bremen Leobener St. 28359 Bremen Germany [email protected] ISBN 978-3-642-05028-2 e-ISBN 978-3-642-05029-9 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-05029-9 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011921703 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protec- tive laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaleidoscope Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    KALEIDOSCOPE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Salina Yoon | 18 pages | 21 Nov 2012 | Little, Brown & Company | 9780316186414 | English | New York, United States Kaleidoscope PDF Book Top 10 Gifts Top 10 Gifts. Best Selling. English Language Learners Definition of kaleidoscope. Love words? Van Cort. Kaleidoscope Necklace, Garnet Saturn by the Healys. Most handmade kaleidoscopes are now made in India, Bangladesh, Japan, the USA, Russia and Italy, following a long tradition of glass craftsmanship in those countries. Enjoy the Majestic Colors of a Vintage Kaleidoscope In , David Brewster invented the kaleidoscope, and most people appreciate the colorful images it reflects. Wikimedia Commons. An early version had pieces of colored glass and other irregular objects fixed permanently and was admired by some Members of the Royal Society of Edinburgh , including Sir George Mackenzie who predicted its popularity. Interactive exhibit modules enabled visitors to better understand and appreciate how kaleidoscopes function. Color Spirit Kaleidoscope in Purple. What should you look for when buying preowned kaleidoscopes? Manufacturers and artists have created kaleidoscopes with a wide variety of materials and in many shapes. The last step, regarded as most important by Brewster, was to place the reflecting panes in a draw tube with a concave lens to distinctly introduce surrounding objects into the reflected pattern. Whether you need a Christmas present, a birthday gift or a token of appreciation for the person who has everything, a kaleidoscope is the perfect choice. Name that government! List View. Please provide a valid price range. Not Specified. The community is fighting to save it," 2 July Also crucial is Murphy's particular knack for using music and color to convey the hothouse longings of her characters; heady metaphors served in the atonal jangle of post punk or the throbbing kaleidoscope of strobe lights at a house party.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Chair from His Enemies by Using Little-Known Causeways on the Norman Coast Dear Pedometricians, 4
    Issue 21 March 2007 Commission 1.5 Pedometrics, Div. 1 of the International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS) Chair: Murray Lark Vice Chair & Editor: Budiman Minasny From the Chair from his enemies by using little-known causeways on the Norman coast Dear Pedometricians, 4. Airphotographs 5. Articles written in the Journal of the Linnean I have just finished reading Society of Caen by a 19th Century priest from a a biography of Desmond parish in Normandy who had an interest in geology. Bernal, a founding father 6. A few core samples obtained from selected of the crystallography of beaches in raids by special forces. macromolecules, a 7. Accounts of a 14th Century legal dispute over farsighted exponent of taxes that allowed him to identify silted-up harbours. science policy, and a Marxist polymath. During Continued next page ….. the Second World War Bernal played a leading role in preparing for the Normandy landings, and I I NSIDE T HIS I SSUE was interested to learn that one of the problems that 1. From the Chair he faced was a classical one in pedometrics. 2. Working Group on Digital Soil Mapping 3. Chance and vision on the road to Pedometrics The question was how to predict the trafficability of 4. The Comte de Buffon beaches for military vehicles, given that they were 5. Buffon’s needle held by the enemy and could not be inspected at 6. Soil Boundaries leisure. If you read Richard Webster's article in this 7. Best paper in pedometrics issue of Pedometron you will see that essentially the 8.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fractal Properties of Retinal Vessels: Embryological and Clinical Implications
    Eye (1990) 4, 235-241 The Fractal Properties of Retinal Vessels: Embryological and Clinical Implications MARTIN A. MAINSTER Kansas City, Kansas, USA Summary The branching patterns of retinal arterial and venous systems have characteristics of a fractal, a geometrical pattern whose parts resemble the whole. Fluorescein angio­ gram collages were digitised and analysed, demonstrating that retinal arterial and venous patterns have fractal dimensions of 1.63 ± 0.05 and 1. 71 ± 0.07, respectively, consistent with the 1.68 ± 0.05 dimension of diffusion limited aggregation. This find­ ing prompts speculation that factors controlling retinal angiogenesis may obey Laplace's equation, with fluctuations in the distribution of embryonic cell-free spaces providing the randomness needed for fractal behaviour and for the unique­ ness of each individual's retinal vascular pattern. Since fractal dimensions charac­ terise how completely vascular patterns span the retina, they can provide insight into the relationship between vascular patterns and retinal disease. Fractal geometry offers a more accurate description of ocular anatomy and pathology than classical geometry, and provides a new language for posing questions about the complex geo­ metrical patterns that are seen in ophthalmic practice. Inspection and photography of ophthalmo­ ing patterns.4,5 Branching patterns are com­ scopic images are vital to modern ophthalmic mon in nature, occurring in such diverse practice, but analysis of those images remains phenomena as river tributary networks, light­ largely a subjective process. In otht:r disci­ ning discharge pathways, and erosion chan­ plines, images are routinely broken into a nels in porous media. Retinal arteries and large number of tiny picture elements, called veins have similar branching patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulence Simulations: Multiscale Modeling and Data-Intensive
    Turbulence simulations: multiscale modeling and data-intensive computing methodologies by Jason Graham A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland January, 2014 c Jason Graham 2014 All rights reserved Abstract In this two part work, methodologies for the multiscale modeling of complex tur- bulent flows and data-intensive computing strategies for large-scale turbulent simu- lations are developed and presented. The first part of this thesis is devoted to the simulation of turbulent flows over objects characterized by hierarchies of length-scale. Flows of this type present special challenges associated with the cost of resolving small-scale geometric elements. During large eddy simulation (LES), their effects on the resolved scales must be captured realistically through subgrid-scale models. Prior work performed by Chester et al. [21] proposed a technique called renormal- ized numerical simulation (RNS), which is applicable to objects that display scale- invariant geometric (fractal) properties. The idea of RNS is similar to that of the dynamic model used in LES to determine model parameters for the subgrid-stress tensor model in the bulk of the flow. In RNS, drag forces from the resolved elements that are obtained during the simulation are re-scaled appropriately by determining drag coefficients that are then applied to specify the drag forces associated with the subgrid-scale elements. In the current work we introduce a generalized framework for ii ABSTRACT describing and implementing the RNS methodology thereby extending the method- ology first presented by Chester et al. [21]. Furthermore, we present various other possible practical implementations of RNS that differ on important, technical aspects related to 1) time averaging, 2) spatial localization, and 3) numerical representation of the drag forces.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT ANDERSON, KAREN MILLER. Leveraging Technology
    ABSTRACT ANDERSON, KAREN MILLER. Leveraging Technology and Creativity among Self- Employed Textile Artists and Designers Through the Use of Geometric Software. (Under the direction of Dr. George L. Hodge and Dr. Cynthia L. Istook.) Self-employed textile artists and designers have many obstacles to overcome; among these obstacles are the use of technology in their work and locating affordable software applications that can be used in their studios. There are a number of specifi c software applications used in industry for textile design. While these systems are extremely powerful and function well for the purpose for which they were designed, they are often expensive, infl exible, and proprietary, which may limit collaboration efforts as well as production capabilities. This very fact may act as a deterrent to the use and adoption of the technology by self-employed artists and designers. There are many software applications that were developed to create patterns for disciplines other than textiles. These programs may have potential for use in textile design and may well be more affordable to the microentrepreneur. Because these applications are mathematical and scientifi c-based software applications, designers are likely to be unaware of their availability and application to textile design. The purpose of this study was twofold. One was to identify and survey the many geometric software applications that have been developed to create pattern and design that have potential for use in the textile industry. The exploration of these applications not only increases awareness of other disciplines, it extends the artist’s vision and creativity. All of the software applications are readily available as freeware, shareware or off-the-shelf.
    [Show full text]
  • Project-Team Virtual Plants Modeling Plant Morphogenesis at Different
    INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE EN INFORMATIQUE ET EN AUTOMATIQUE Project-Team Virtual Plants Modeling plant morphogenesis at different scales, from genes to phenotypes Sophia Antipolis THEME BIO d© ctivity eport 2006 Table of contents 1. Team ....................................................................................... 1 2. Overall Objectives ........................................................................... 1 2.1. Overall Objectives 1 3. Scientific Foundations ....................................................................... 2 3.1. Analysis of structures resulting from meristem activity 2 3.2. Meristem functioning and development 3 3.3. OpenAlea: An open-software platform for plant modeling 3 4. Software .................................................................................... 4 4.1. VPlants 4 4.2. OpenAlea 4 5. New Results ................................................................................. 5 5.1. Analysis of structures resulting from meristem activity 5 5.1.1. Analysis of the relative extents of preformation and neoformation in tree shoots by a deconvolution method 5 5.1.2. Analysis of longitudinal count data and underdispersion 6 5.1.3. Changes in branching structures within the whole plants 6 5.1.4. Growth components in trees 7 5.1.5. Markov switching models 7 5.1.6. Diagnostic tools for hidden Markovian models 7 5.1.7. Methods for exploring the segmentation space for multiple change-point models 8 5.1.8. Hidden Markov tree models for investigating physiological states within plants 9 5.1.9. Branching processes for plant development analysis 9 5.1.10. Self-similarity in plants 9 5.1.11. Reconstruction of plant foliage density from photographs 10 5.1.12. Fractal analysis of plant geometry 11 5.1.13. Light interception by canopy 11 5.1.14. Heritability of architectural traits 12 5.1.15. Lumped processes constructed from Markov chains 13 5.1.16.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Document
    Assignment 5 – Fractals Maximum Points = 50 The purpose of this lab is to focus on the study of classes, objects, GUI, and recursion. “A fractal is a geometric shape that can be made up of the same pattern repeated at different scales and orientations. The nature of a fractal lends itself to a recursive definition. Interest in fractals has grown immensely in recent years, largely due to Benoit Mandelbrot, a Polish mathematician born in 1924. He demonstrated that fractals occur in many places in mathematics and nature. Computers have made fractals much easier to generate and investigate. Over the past quarter century, the bright, interesting images that can be created with fractals have come to be considered as much an art form as a mathematical interest.” [Java Software Solutions 6th Edition, Lewis & Loftus, pg. 604] One particular example of a fractal is called the “H tree (so called because its first two steps resemble the letter "H"). They can be constructed by starting with a line segment of arbitrary length, drawing two shorter segments at right angles to the first through its endpoints, and continuing in the same vein, reducing (dividing) the length of the line segments drawn at each stage by √2. Surprisingly, continuing this process will eventually come arbitrarily close to every point in a rectangle, or in other words, the H-fractal is a space-filling curve.[2] It is also an example of a fractal canopy, in which the angle between neighboring line segments is always 180 degrees…. The H tree is commonly used in VLSI design as a clock distribution network for routing timing signals to all parts of a chip with equal propagation delays to each part.[3] For the same reason, the H tree is used in arrays of microstrip antennas in order to get the radio signal to every individual microstrip antenna with equal propagation delay.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractal Series by John Driscoll Rough Draft 10/22/2012
    Fractal Series by John Driscoll Rough Draft 10/22/2012 Contents 1. Introduction 2. L-Systems (2D and 3D models) 3. Fractal Dimension and Box-Counting Dimension 4. Box-Counting Dimension applied (coastlines, GIS, biology etc.) 5. Conclusion 1. Introduction FIG. 1.1. Lightning, displaying a fractal branching structure. Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a straight line (Benoit Mandelbrot) An intuitive understanding of the spatial implications of fractals is described by Benoit Mandel- brot as analogous to a ball of thread, “To an observer placed far away, (a ball of thread) appears as a zero dimensional figure: a point. As seen from a distance of 10 cm resolution, the ball of thread is a three dimensional figure. At 10 mm, it is a mess of one-dimensional threads” (Man- delbrot 1983). Please open and run the NetLogo model labelled simple-ball-of-thread.nlogo for a demonstration of this somewhat paradoxical description of the ‘spatial implications of frac- tals’. Exploring Complexity Exploring complexity and Complex adaptive systems (CAS) often involves feedback dynamics. Feedback is a self-referential property of CAS where the state of a system informs itself in some way. Fractals are basic examples of feedback. A fractal is a shape that re-occurs at ever decreas- ing or increasing scales, so that as we zoom in or out the same shape re-emerges over and over again. The images produced by turning a kaleidoscope demonstrate this idea of feedback. The image in a kaleidoscope is reflected over and over again — a feedback loop — but also forms a larger image which is a version of itself at a different scale.
    [Show full text]
  • P. Prusinkiewicz and A. Lindenmayer, the Algorithmic Beauty of Plants
    Aristid Lindenmayer 1925–1989 Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz Aristid Lindenmayer The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants With James S. Hanan F. David Fracchia Deborah Fowler MartinJ.M.deBoer Lynn Mercer With 150 Illustrations, 48 in Color This edition of The Alogirthmic Beauty of Plants is the electronic version of the book that was published by Springer-Verlag, New York, in 1990 and reprinted in 1996. The electronic version has been produced using the orig- inal LATEX files and digital illustrations. c 2004 Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz All rights reserved. Front cover design: The roses in the foreground (Roses by D. R. Fowler, J. Hanan and P. Prusinkiewicz [1990]) were modeled using L-systems. Dis- tributed ray-tracing with one extended light source was used to simulate depth of field. The roses were placed on a background image (photgraphy by G. Rossbach), which was scanned digitally and post-processed. Preface The beauty of plants has attracted the attention of mathematicians for Mathematics centuries. Conspicuous geometric features such as the bilateral sym- and beauty metry of leaves, the rotational symmetry of flowers, and the helical arrangements of scales in pine cones have been studied most exten- sively. This focus is reflected in a quotation from Weyl [159, page 3], “Beauty is bound up with symmetry.” This book explores two other factors that organize plant structures and therefore contribute to their beauty. The first is the elegance and relative simplicity of developmental algorithms, that is, the rules which describe plant development in time. The second is self-similarity,char- acterized by Mandelbrot [95, page 34] as follows: When each piece of a shape is geometrically similar to the whole, both the shape and the cascade that generate it are called self-similar.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulence Generated by Fractal Trees
    Turbulence generated by Fractal Trees PIV Measurements and Comparison with numerical Data Master Thesis Submitted by: Marc Dreissigacker Date of Birth: September 26, 1990 Course: Physikalische Ingenieurwissenschaft First Supervisor: Prof. Dr. sc. techn. habil. Jörn Sesterhenn Second Supervisor: Dr.-Ing. Thomas Engels Date: May 12, 2017 Eidesstattliche Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und eigen- händig sowie ohne unerlaubte fremde Hilfe und ausschließlich unter Ver- wendung der aufgeführten Quellen und Hilfsmittel angefertigt habe. Statutory Declaration I hereby declare that I have authored this thesis independently, that I have not used other than the declared sources / resources, and that I have explic- itly marked all material which has been quoted either literally or by content from the used sources. Berlin, Marc Dreissigacker CONTENTS Abstract xv 1 Introduction 17 2 Literature Review: Fractal Tree Turbulence 19 3 Fractal Trees 23 3.1 Design & Choice of Parameters . 24 3.1.1 First Approach in MATLAB . 25 3.1.2 Vortex Shedding Frequency and Branch Diameters . 28 3.1.3 Generation of 3D-STL-mask with FLUSI . 30 3.2 3D-printing and Assembly ..................... 33 3.2.1 Preparation in SOLIDWORKS . 33 3.2.2 Printing the H-tree ..................... 35 3.2.3 Printing the Pyramid- & Spherical Tree . 38 4 Experimental Setup & Validation 41 4.1 Windtunnnel ............................. 41 4.1.1 Blockage ........................... 43 4.2 PIV System .............................. 44 4.3 Analysis Software PIVLAB ..................... 46 4.4 Validation Cases ........................... 47 5 Experimental Results 55 5.1 Pyramid-tree ............................. 55 5.2 Large Branch of the spherical tree . 64 5.3 Small Branch of the spherical tree .
    [Show full text]