DOCSLIB.ORG

Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review Yerevan, October 2013 Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review Yerevan, October 2013 CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATES Currency unit = Armenian Dram (AMD) US$ 1 = AMD 414 Euro 1 = AMD 543 GOVERNMENT FISCAL YEAR (FY) 1 January – 31 December PEFA ASSESSMENT PERIOD FY 2010, FY 2011, FY 2012 2 Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations 5 Foreword and acknowledgements 7 Summary 8 1 Introduction 16 1.1 Objective of the PFM-PR 16 1.2 Process of preparing the PFM-PR 16 1.3 Methodology 17 1.4 Scope of the assessment 18 2 Background information 19 2.1 Economic Context, Development and Reforms 19 2.1.1 Country context 19 2.1.2 City of Yerevan 20 2.2 Description of budgetary outcomes 20 2.2.1 Fiscal performance 20 2.2.2 Allocation of resources 21 2.3 Overall Government reform program 22 2.3.1 Overall Government reform program 22 2.4 Legal and institutional framework for PFM 24 2.4.1 The legal framework for PFM 24 2.4.2 The institutional framework for PFM 25 3 Assessment of PFM Systems, processes and institutions 32 3.1 HLG-1 - Predictability of Transfers from a Higher Level of Government 32 3.2 Budget credibility 36 3.2.1 PI-1 Aggregate expenditure out-turn compared to original approved budget 36 3.2.2 PI-2 Composition of expenditure out-turn compared to original approved budget 37 3.2.3 PI-3 Aggregate revenue out-turn compared to original approved budget 38 3.2.4 PI-4 Stock and monitoring of expenditure payment arrears 40 3.3 Comprehensiveness and transparency 42 3.3.1 PI-5 Classification of the budget 42 3.3.2 PI-6 Comprehensiveness of information included in budget documentation 44 3.3.3 PI-7 Extent of unreported government operations 45 3.3.4 PI-8 Transparency of inter-governmental fiscal relations 47 3.3.5 PI-9 Oversight of aggregate fiscal risk from other public sector entities 47 3.3.6 PI-10 Public access to key fiscal information 51 3.4 Policy-based budgeting 57 3.4.1 PI-11 Orderliness and participation in the annual budget process 57 3.4.2 PI-12 Multi-year perspective in fiscal planning, expenditure policy and budgeting 59 3.5 Predictability and control in budget execution 61 3.5.1 PI-13 - Transparency of taxpayer responsibilities and obligations 61 3.5.2 PI-14 Effectiveness of measures for taxpayer registration and tax assessment 64 3.5.3 PI-15 Effectiveness in collection of tax payments 67 3.5.4 PI-16 Predictability in the availability of funds for commitment of expenditures 69 Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review 3 3.5.5 PI-17 Recording and management of cash balances, debt and guarantees 72 3.5.6 PI-18 Effectiveness of payroll controls 72 3.5.7 PI-19 Competition, value for money and controls in procurement 76 3.5.8 PI-20 Effectiveness of internal controls for non-salary expenditure 87 3.5.9 PI-21 Effectiveness of internal audit 89 3.6 Accounting, recording and reporting 92 3.6.1 PI-22 Timeliness and regularity of accounts reconciliation 92 3.6.2 PI-23 Availability of information on resources received by service delivery units 94 3.6.3 PI-24 Quality and timeliness of in-year budget reports 96 3.6.4 PI-25 Quality and timeliness of annual financial statements 99 3.7 External scrutiny and audit 100 3.7.1 PI-26 Scope, nature and follow-up of external audit 100 3.7.2 PI-27 Legislative scrutiny of the annual budget law 103 3.7.3 PI-28 Legislative scrutiny of external audit reports 107 4 Government Reform Process 110 4.1 Current approach to PFM reforms 110 4.2 Recent and ongoing reforms 110 4.3 Forward looking perspective on institutional factors supporting PFM reforms 112 Annexes Annex 1: Sub-national government in Armenia 114 Annex 2: PFM Performance Measurement Framework Indicators Summary 120 Annex 3: Sources of information and evidence 132 Annex 4: List of Stakeholders Interviewed 148 Annex 5: Files for calculating HLG-1, PI-1 and PI-2 152 Annex 6: Timetable for the assessment process 161 Annex 7: Organisational chart of Financial Department at Yerevan Municipality 162 Annex 8: Disclosure of Quality Assurance Mechanism 163 4 Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review Acronyms and Abbreviations AD Administrative District ADB Asian Development Bank AGA Autonomous Government Agencies AMD Armenian Drams CBA Central Bank of Armenia CC State Committee for Real Estate Cadastre CG Central Government COC Chamber of Control CNCO Community Non-commercial Organization COFOG Classification of the Functions of Government DD Development and Investment Programs Department EC European Community FD Financial Department at Yerevan Municipality FY Fiscal Year GDP Gross Domestic Product GFS Government Financial Statistics HLG Higher Level Government IA Internal Audit IMF International Monetary Fund JSC Joint Stock Company LLC Limited Liability Company MDA Ministries Departments and Agencies MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework MOF Ministry of Finance MOFE Ministry of Finance and Economy MTA Ministry of Territorial Administration NGO Non-Governmental Organisation OD Organisational Department at Yerevan Municipality PD Procurement Department at Yerevan Municipality PE Public Enterprise PEFA Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability PFM Public Financial Management PMF Performance Measurement Framework PSC Procurement Support Centre RA Republic of Armenia Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review 5 RC State Revenue Committee RD Revenue Accounting and Taxation Department at Yerevan Municipality SAFE Strengthening Accountability and the Fiduciary Environment SCFE Standing Commission on Financial-Credit, Economic Issues SD Supervision Department at Yerevan Municipality SMD Staff Management Division at Yerevan Municipality SECO State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (Switzerland) SNCO State Non-commercial Organization SN Sub-National SNG Sub-National Government TIN Tax Identification Number TSA Treasury Single Account TTL Task Team Leader WB World Bank YM Yerevan Municipality 6 Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review Foreword and acknowledgements The present PEFA evaluation of the City of Yerevan is based on field work in January through June 2013 carried out by Arman Vatyan (TTL World Bank), Andrew Mackie (PFM Consultant), Karen Brutyan (Fieldwork Coordinator), Vahan Sirunyan and Sergey Shahnazaryan (Local Consultants). Paul Harnett (PFM Consultant) delivered the introductory training workshop in January 2013. The information provided in this report is drawn mainly from official documents and communications as well as from working sessions with qualified counterparts in Yerevan Municipality and other government bodies. The Municipality confirmed the Report as final on September 2013. The authors are particularly grateful to the City authorities at Yerevan Municipality and other government bodies who provided a great deal of the information for the report and have been constantly available and accessible during the field work. Mr Vahe Nikoyan (Deputy Mayor) was the Chair of the Sub-National Government Steering Committee which coordinated the PEFA work and has shown a great commitment and involvement in the exercise. Yerevan City: Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) Performance Review 7 Summary This Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) performance review assessment is the first assessment both for Yerevan Municipality and for any community in Armenia. The main objectives of the current assessment are set a baseline for PFM performance in the Municipality and provide input into its PFM reform strategy which will be developed later in 2013. The assessment follows the PEFA Framework methodology and supporting guidelines and clarifications to the Framework. No deviations from the methodology were made. This report presents the indicator-led assessment of the functioning of the PFM systems in YM which will allow subsequent assessments measures the progress achieved by on-going reforms. Following the philosophy of the PEFA framework this performance review report does not comment on policy and capacity issues, nor does it include any specific recommendations for PFM improvements. This section of the report provides an integrated assessment and a summary of the main performance changes in the functioning of the PFM systems in Yerevan against the six core dimensions of PFM performance in the performance Measurement Framework, and the extent to which this performance may impact upon the achievement of the three main objectives/outputs of a sound PFM namely aggregate fiscal discipline, strategic allocation of resources and efficient service delivery. I. Integrated Assessment of PFM Performance Predictability of Transfers from a Higher Level of Government The funds provided to the Yerevan community through the RA Government transfer or revenue sharing arrangements comprise a significant proportion of the total revenues of the Yerevan Municipality budget for 2010-2012 (more than 60 percent). For each of the last three years transfers over-performed budget estimates and allocations arrived on a timely basis. For 2011-2012 allocations in the form of targeted government transfers to the Yerevan budget showed significant positive variances from the original budget, due mainly to increases in central government (CG) allocations in non- conditional grants and to a number of sectors. A. Credibility of the budget Lower-than-budgeted revenue receipts contributed to negative expenditure deviations in each of the three fiscal years (2010-2012). The principal reason for the underperformance was the late receipt or cancellation of donor funding, which are transfers from CG. The unpredictable nature of funding from donor projects was the main reason for the significant deviations across categories in all three years. Domestic revenue out-turn in Yerevan budget over 2010-2012 underperformed by 96.6%, 93.5% and 81.0% respectively.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE ARMENIAN Ctator Volume LXXXVIII, NO
    MARCH 3, 2018 Mirror-SpeTHE ARMENIAN ctator Volume LXXXVIII, NO. 32, Issue 4527 $ 2.00 NEWS The First English Language Armenian Weekly in the United States Since 1932 INBRIEF (AP PHOTO) Azerbaijan Distorts Killing Orders Lays Bare Reality over Khojaly Orders for Armenian YEREVAN (Armenpress) — Twenty two Members of the European Parliament MEPs representing the Annihilation by Turkish Club of Azerbaijan`s Friends in the European Government Parliament have signed a declaration where noth- ing is mentioned about “genocide,” or Armenians or Armenia. A day before the Azerbaijani mass media spread information that allegedly the By Alin K. Gregorian European parliament has adopted a declaration Mirror-Spectator Staff over the “Khojaly events.” Earlier, in a meeting with Azerbaijanis in the Georgian city Marneuli, President of Georgia Giorgi Margvelashvili did not WORCESTER — Prof. Taner Akçam has yield to the provocation of one of the participant been at the forefront of finding evidence young men, who asked the President to honor the confirming the Armenian Genocide and the memory of the victims of the so-called “Khojaly role of the Ottoman central government in events” with a minute of silence. Azerbaijani media the murders for decades. His latest book, outlets note that the ceremony of the one-minute Killing Orders: Talat Pasha’s Telegrams and silence did not take place, instead Margvelashvili the Armenian Genocide, is the latest volley noted that he follows Nagorno Karabakh conflict he has launched to bring down the curtain People pray next to the closed doors of the Holy Sepluchre Church on February 25 settlement process. “Georgia is against the escala- of denial of the tion of Nagorno Karabakh conflict,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Strasbourg, Le 13 Octobre 2003
    Strasbourg, 27 September 2013 T-PVS/Files (2013) 39 [files39e_2013.doc] CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF EUROPEAN WILDLIFE AND NATURAL HABITATS Standing Committee 33rd meeting Strasbourg, 3-6 December 2013 __________ Implementation of Recommendation No. 162 (2012) on the conservation of large carnivores populations in Europe requesting special conservation action REPORTS BY THE PARTIES Memorandum drawn up by the Directorate of Democratic Governance The document is being circulated in the form and the languages in which it was received by the Secretariat Note du Secrétariat Général établie par la Direction de la Gouvernance démocratique Le document apparaît sous la forme et rédigé tel qu'il a été reçu au Secrétariat ____________________________________________________________________ This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera plus distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. T-PVS/Files (2013) 39 - 2 - CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE Armenia / Arménie Portugal / Portugal - 3 - T-PVS/Files (2013) 39 ARMENIA / ARMÉNIE STATUS OF LARGE CARNIVORES /LC/ IN ARMENIA The Science Center of Zoology and Hydroecology of National Academy of Science of RA and Yerevan State University in the frames of their scientific themes are and have always been examining the vertebrate large carnivores including large carnivore mammals and birds in the territory of Armenia,. A number of scientific works, made by the research workers of the Science Center of Zoology and Hydroecology NAS during many years have been devoted to the following. Examination of LC distribution and change of the areal (area of distribution) within the whole territory of the republic. Examination of landscape-biotopical distribution Evaluation of the current state of the population, their protection and rational use, as well as other works.
    [Show full text]
  • Yerevan Green City Action Plan
    DRAFT (3 July 2017) Yerevan Green City Action Plan Yerevan 2017 OFFICIAL USE Yerevan’s Green City Action Plan Disclaimer This Green City Action Plan was prepared for the City of Yerevan by an international team of experts led by Ernst & Young, s.r.o. (Czech Republic). Other members of the consortium included GEOtest, SWECO, SEVEn and local experts. The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the Czech Government's Official Development Assistance Technical Cooperation Fund or the City of Yerevan do not carry any responsibility for the selection, involvement and monitoring of Ernst & Young and / or any third party claims towards EBRD for utilizing services provided by Ernst & Young. 1 OFFICIAL USE Executive Summary In the light of continuous global urbanization, sustainable development challenges increasingly stem from cities. Yerevan is fully aware of these challenges, as the administrative as well as economic centre of Armenia, the overall economic prosperity of the country is substantially anchored on Yerevan’s economic development The quality of the urban environment, including air, water, soil, biodiversity, environmental assets and ecosystems are negatively impacted by human activities such as transport, energy, water use and waste management. In the recent years, many measures have already been taken to remedy the situation, but the measures should be doubled in the coming years to raise the quality of life in the City to standards seen in many European cities. These efforts will also help Yerevan contribute to global efforts in climate change mitigation and the transition to green economy. Methodology The Green City Action Plan (GCAP) was developed by applying 4 stage methodology, which is as follows: Stage 1 focused on relevant information and data identification, collection, processing and analysis to establish the baseline indicators, which rank the city compared to internationally recognized benchmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia ARMENIA
    Armenia I.H.T. Visa: required by all. ARMENIA Duty Free: permitted goods: 400 cigaretters, 1 bottle of alcoholic beverages, a reasonable quantity of perfume for personal use, other goods up to the amount of US$500, for personal use only. Health: typhoid and polio special precautions. All water should be regarded as potentially contaminated HOTELS●MOTELS●INNS GYUMRI HOTEL ARAKS, 31 Gorki str., Gyumri, Republic of Armenia, 377501, tel: (+374312) 2-44-35 , www.arakshotel.am , email: [email protected] YEREVAN ANI PLAZA HOTEL, 19 Sayat Nova Ave, Yerevan, Yerevan 375001, Armenia,+374 10589500, [email protected] ,www.anihotel.com ARARAT HOTEL, Grigor Lusavorih, 7 , Tel.: +374 510000 , Fax: 541101 ARMA HOTEL, Norki Ayginer street, 275 , Tel.: +374 (1) 546000 , Rooms: 20, Floors: 5, Nearest metro station: "Yaritasardakan" ARMENIA 1 Ulitsa Amiriyan 375010 Jerevan Armenia Tel: +374.8852-525383 [email protected]: //www.moon.yerpi.am/armhotel/index.html 1. Amiryan Street , Yerevan, ARMENIA MARRIOTT HOTEL YEREVAN, 0010 Armenia , Phone: 374 10 599 000 , Fax: 374 10 599 001 , Sales: 374 10 599 002 , Sales fax: 374 10 599 256 , http://www.marriott.co.uk AUA BARSAM SUITES HOTEL, 8 Harapetutyan St, Yerevan, Armenia Directory 0010, Phone: 374 10-567567, Email: [email protected] , Country Dialling Code (Tel/Fax): ++374 http://www.hybusiness.com The Armenian Tourism Development Agency (ATDA),(+3741) 542303/06 AVIATRANS HOTEL Abovyan street, 4 , Tel.: +374 (1) 567228 ,Rooms: 15 , Travel [email protected] , http://www.armeniainfo.am Floors 4, Location: Nearest metro station: "Hanrapetutyan" Capital: Yerevan time: GMT + 4 BEST EASTERN METROPOL YEREVAN, 2 2 Mashtots Ave, Yerevan, and Background: An Orthodox Christian country, Armenia was incorporated into Russia Armenia 375015, Phone: 374 1-543701, Email: [email protected] , in 1828 and the USSR in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia-Caucasus
    Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 11 NO. 11 3 June 2009 Searchable Archives with over 1,500 articles at http://www.cacianalyst.org ANALYTICAL ARTICLES: FIELD REPORTS: RUSSIAN PRESSURE AFFECTS UN STANCE ON GEORGIAN CONFLICTS RESETTLEMENT FOR THE ROGUN DAM RES- Johanna Popjanevski ERVOIR BEGINS IN TAJIKISTAN Alexander Sodiqov CENTRAL ASIA STRIVES TO RESIST ATTACKS IN KHANABAD AND ANDIJAN: NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION TIDE WHAT IS TRUE? Richard Weitz Erkin Akhmadov YEREVAN MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS DEEPEN WHOSE ‘SPHERE OF INFLUENCE’? EASTERN THE POLITICAL CRISIS IN ARMENIA PARTNERSHIP SUMMIT IN PRAGUE Blanka Hancilova Karoly Benes EMOMALI RAHMON ANNOUNCES FIGHT CONSTRUCTION BOOM AND AGAINST PERSONALITY CULT BANKING CRISIS IN KAZAKHSTAN Suhrob Majidov Alima Bissenova NEWS DIGEST Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst BI-WEEKLY BRIEFING VOL. 11 NO. 11 3 JUNE 2009 Contents Analytical Articles RUSSIAN PRESSURE AFFECTS UN STANCE ON GEORGIAN CONFLICTS 3 Johanna Popjanevski CENTRAL ASIA STRIVES TO RESIST NUCLEAR PROLIFERATION TIDE 6 Richard Weitz YEREVAN MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS DEEPEN THE POLITICAL CRISIS IN ARMENIA 9 Blanka Hancilova CONSTRUCTION BOOM AND BANKING CRISIS IN KAZAKHSTAN 13 Alima Bissenova Field Reports RESETTLEMENT FOR THE ROGUN DAM RESERVOIR BEGINS IN TAJIKISTAN 16 Alexander Sodiqov ATTACKS IN KHANABAD AND ANDIJAN: WHAT IS TRUE? 17 Erkin Akhmadov WHOSE ‘SPHERE OF INFLUENCE’? EASTERN PARTNERSHIP SUMMIT IN PRAGUE 18 Karoly Benes EMOMALI RAHMON ANNOUNCES FIGHT AGAINST PERSONALITY CULT 20 Suhrob Majidov News Digest 22 THE CENTRAL ASIA-CAUCASUS ANALYST Editor: Svante E. Cornell Associate Editor: Niklas Nilsson Assistant Editor, News Digest: Alima Bissenova Chairman, Editorial Board: S. Frederick Starr The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is an English-language journal devoted to analysis of the current issues facing Central Asia and the Caucasus.
    [Show full text]
  • Shelter Sector Reform Project Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union
    Shelter Sector Reform Project Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union An ICMA Report Prepared for the Office of Housing and Urban Programs Agency for International Development International Municipal Programs Development of an Action Plan on Housing Policy Reform in the Republic of Armenia 17-31 March 1995 Prepared for the U.S. Agency for International Development Bureau for Europe and the Newly Independent States Office of Environment, Energy and Urban Development Urban Development and Housing Division By James Christian INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION USAID Contract No. CCS-0008-C-00-2056-00 Project No. 110-0008 Task Order No. 72 Shelter Sector Reform Project for the Newly Independent States of the Former Soviet Union TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT 1 I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. LAW ON HOUSING POLiCY 2 III. HOUSING POLICY ACTION PLAN 3 IV. HOUSING FINANCE SYSTEM 3 V. USAID DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR ARMENIA 3 VI. DATA DEVELOPMENT 3 VII. PERSONS CONTACTED 4 ANNEXES ANNEX 1 - Scope of Work ANNEX 2 - Draft Law on Housing Policy ANNEX 3 - Draft Housing Policy Action Plan ANNEX 4 - Housing Finance System ANNEX 5 - USAID Development Strategy ABSTRACT Pursuant to ICMA letter of 13 March 1995, issued under Task Order 72, the Consultant traveled to Armenia during the period of 17 March through 31 March 1995 to render assistance in the following areas: " Development of an Action Plan on Housing Policy Reform; * Assistance in drafting the Law on Housing Policy; and, * Advising on the compilation of statistical data for monitoring heusing reform objectives on an ongoing basis. 1 I. INTRODUCTION Consultant traveled to Armenia during the period of 17 March to 31 March 1995 to undertake the following activities (See Annex 1): * To render assistance in the development of an Action Plan on Housing Policy Reform; " To provide needed assistance in drafting 'he Law on Housing Policy: and, * To advise on the compilation of statistical data for monitoring housing reform objectives on an ongoing basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    2011–2013 MEDIUM–TERM PUBLIC EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 4 Objectives and Tasks.................................................................................................................................. 4 Medium-Term Public Expenditures Planning Attitudes......................................................................... 5 Organizational Bases for Elaboration of the MTEF 2011-2013 ...............................................................6 Reforms Aimed at Improvement of Medium-Term Expenditure Planning ........................................... 7 PART A. FISCAL POLICY.......................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 1. STRATEGIC AND MEDIUM-TERM PRIORITIES AND THEIR PROVISION................................................................................................................. 9 STRATEGIC AND MEDIUM-TERM PRIORITIES .......................................................................9 OBJECTIVES OF MEDIUM-TERM EXPENDITURE FRAMEWORK .........................................9 FISCAL PRINCIPLES AND INDICATORS ....................................................................................9 LONG-TERM FISCAL PRINCIPLES..............................................................................................9 SHORT-TERM AND MEDIUM-TERM FISCAL INDICATORS ................................................10 CHAPTER 2. MACROECONOMIC
    [Show full text]
  • Publications-7
    SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM FOUR YEARS OF PROGRESS Yerevan is the economic, scientific and cultural center of the Republic of Armenia. It is considered as the major regional transportation junction. And due to the increase of the transportation flow the necessity of the city expansion is becoming a vital issue. Sustainable development preconditions are urged along with the expansion of Yerevan. One of the sustainable development projects is implemented within the framework of Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program, the aim of which is to create safe, affordable and sustainable transport system. The aim of the Project implemented by the loan funds of the Asian Development Bank is to construct a highway according to international standards, which will also significantly relieve the city center from the traffic flows. Yerevan Municipality is currently working with the Asian Development Bank on the implementation of the Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program, which is the biggest infrastructure investment project implemented in Yerevan during the last 30 years. As a result of this cooperation the City of Yerevan is going to have the Western Ring Road, linking North and South of the City and significantly decreasing the traffic in the center of the City, as well as a new bus network. By the loan funds of the Asian Development Bank major road construction programs are carried out in Yerevan. Construction of roads and bridges, improvement of urban infrastructure, rehabilitation of public transport network and infrastructure are planned within the Sustainable Urban Development Investment Program. 2 3 ARSHAKUNYATS AVENUE (reconstruction/widening of the existing road section) The newly reconstructed road section with 1.3km length and 21m width carriageway located within Arshakunyats Avenue, Ashkhatank square and Shirak street was put into operation in December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • IFES in Armenia
    IFES in Armenia The International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) is currently working in Armenia under a four-year assistance agreement “Strengthening Electoral Processes and Political Accountability in Armenia” (SEPPA), funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Project activities aim to promote the integrity of elections through electoral reform and professional development of election administration and to foster broader citizen engagement in elections and political processes. At the request of USAID, IFES re-established itself in Armenia in June 2018 following a IFES supports citizens’ sudden, peaceful change in power. Under the Rapid Response initiative “Strengthen- right to participate in free ing Armenia’s Political Transition” (SAPT), IFES provided immediate assistance to the rapidly unfolding process of political transition and electoral reform ushered in by the and fair elections. Our street protests in April 2018 and the appointment of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. independent expertise strengthens electoral During SAPT, IFES worked with the new government and civil society organizations (CSOs) to recommend amendments to the Election Code and assess the capacity of systems and builds local the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) to administer early elections. IFES was the capacity to promote only organization in Armenia to provide immediate electoral support to the CEC sustainable democracy. for the preparation and conduct of the snap municipal elections in Yerevan that followed the unexpected self-dissolution of the Yerevan City Council of Elders. IFES- led assistance activities for the September 23, 2018, City Council elections in Yerevan included training of 4,750 poll workers and implementation of a voter education and motivation campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Armenia
    Doc. 11962 22 June 2009 The functioning of democratic institutions in Armenia Report Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee) Co-rapporteurs: Mr Georges COLOMBIER, France, Group of the European People’s Party, and Mr John PRESCOTT, United Kingdom, Socialist Group Summary The present report notes that, as a result of the efforts by the Parliamentary Assembly, as well as other parts of the Council of Europe, and also the excellent co-operation with the Armenian delegation to the Assembly over the last fifteen months, incremental progress has been made by the Armenian authorities to comply with the demands of the Assembly: – the controversial amendments to the Law on Conducting Meetings, Assemblies, Rallies and Demonstrations have been repealed; – an investigation into the events of 1 and 2 March 2008 has started; – important changes to problematic provisions in the Criminal Code have been adopted; – and several reforms recommended by the Assembly have been initiated. That process has now culminated in an amnesty as a result of which most, albeit not all, persons deprived of their liberty in relation to the events of 1 and 2 March 2008 will be released. At the same time, the Monitoring Committee notes that the fact-finding group to establish the facts with regard the events on 1 and 2 March 2008 and their circumstances has been disbanded due to insurmountable tensions between its members and considers that the disbandment of the fact-finding group should not be allowed to circumvent the conclusion of an independent and credible inquiry as demanded by the Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Armenia's Past, Present and Future
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 5-17-2020 Armenia’s Past, Present and Future -- Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? -- Velvet Revolution 2018 Stella Tangiyan [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Tangiyan, Stella, "Armenia’s Past, Present and Future -- Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? -- Velvet Revolution 2018". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2020. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/859 Armenia’s Past, Present and Future Where it was? Where it is? Where is it going? Velvet Revolution 2018 By Stella Tangiyan Advisor: Andrew Flibbert Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Degree of Bachelor of Arts in Political Science 1 Table of Contents Armenian Velvet Revolution ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Chapter 1: Exploring Color Revolutions ………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Chapter 2: External Factors That Caused the Velvet Revolution …………………………………………… 33 Chapter 3: Internal Factors That Caused the Velvet Revolution …………………………………………… 46 Chapter 4: Post-Velvet Revolution Armenia ……………………………………………………………………….. 88 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 119 References …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 122 2 Acknowledgments From the bottom of my heart, I would like to thank Trinity College’s Political Science department. Professors that I met here truly inspired me to strive for knowledge and appreciate academia. Thank you to Professor Andrew Flibbert, my thesis advisor, who was with me throughout this whole journey. While not having much knowledge in the area of my research, he agreed to guide me through this process. His comments and contributions truly helped me with navigating my thesis-writing journey.
    [Show full text]