Signaling at the Cell Surface

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Signaling at the Cell Surface 13 SIGNALING AT THE CELL SURFACE Three-dimensional structure of the G protein ␤ (blue) and ␥ (purple) complex as obtained by x-ray crystallography. o cell lives in isolation. In eukaryotic microorgan- plasma membrane and bind to intracellular receptors. Sig- isms such as yeast, slime molds, and protozoans, se- naling from such intracellular receptors is discussed in Ncreted molecules called pheromones coordinate the Chapter 11. aggregation of free-living cells for sexual mating or differ- In this and the next two chapters, we focus on signaling entiation under certain environmental conditions. Yeast from a diverse group of receptor proteins located in the mating-type factors are a well-understood example of plasma membrane (Figure 13-1). The signaling molecule pheromone-mediated cell-to-cell signaling (Chapter 22). acts as a ligand, which binds to a structurally complemen- More important in plants and animals are extracellular sig- tary site on the extracellular or membrane-spanning do- naling molecules that function within an organism to control mains of the receptor. Binding of a ligand to its receptor metabolic processes within cells, the growth and differentia- causes a conformational change in the cytosolic domain or tion of tissues, the synthesis and secretion of proteins, and domains of the receptor that ultimately induces specific cel- the composition of intracellular and extracellular fluids. Ad- lular responses. The overall process of converting signals jacent cells often communicate by direct cell-cell contact. For into cellular responses, as well as the individual steps in this example, gap junctions in the plasma membranes of adjacent cells permit them to exchange small molecules and to coor- dinate metabolic responses. Other junctions between adja- OUTLINE cent cells determine the shape and rigidity of many tissues; other interactions adhere cells to the extracellular matrix. 13.1 Signaling Molecules and Cell-Surface Such cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions, which are covered Receptors in Chapter 6, may also initiate intracellular signaling via 13.2 Intracellular Signal Transduction pathways similar to those discussed in this and subsequent chapters. 13.3 G Protein–Coupled Receptors That Activate Extracellular signaling molecules are synthesized and re- or Inhibit Adenylyl Cyclase leased by signaling cells and produce a specific response only in target cells that have receptors for the signaling molecules. 13.4 G Protein–Coupled Receptors That Regulate In multicellular organisms, an enormous variety of chemi- Ion Channels cals, including small molecules (e.g., amino acid or lipid de- 13.5 G Protein–Coupled Receptors That Activate rivatives, acetylcholine), peptides, and proteins, are used in Phospholipase C this type of cell-to-cell communication. Some signaling mol- ecules, especially hydrophobic molecules such as steroids, 13.6 Activation of Gene Transcription retinoids, and thyroxine, spontaneously diffuse through the by G Protein–Coupled Receptors 533 534 CHAPTER 13 • Signaling at the Cell Surface Exterior P P Cytosol P P Nucleus P P P P P G protein-coupled Cytokine receptors Receptor tyrosine TGFβ receptors Hedgehog (Hh) Wnt receptors Notch receptor receptors kinases receptors Linked to a trimeric G Associated with Cytosolic domain Cytosolic domain Hh ligand tethered to Palmitoylated Wnt Ligand, Delta, is a protein that controls cytosolic JAK kinases with tyrosine kinase with serine/threonine membrane of ligand binds seven transmembrane the activity of an activity kinase activity signaling cell by transmembrane protein on signaling effector protein (here cholesterol anchor protein receptor cell adenylyl cyclase) complex Activate cytosolic or Activate cytosolic Activate cytosolic Activate Smad Control processing Release an activated Cytosolic domain of nuclear transcription STAT transcription kinases (here MAP transcription factors of transcription factor transcription factor Notch released by factors via several factors by kinase) that trans- in the cytosol by by proteolysis; from a multiprotein proteolysis acts in pathways (here one phosphorylation locate to the nucleus phosphorylation Hh binding causes complex in the association with involving protein and activate nuclear release from cytosol nuclear transcription kinase A) transcription factors cytosolic complex factors by phosphorylation ▲ FIGURE 13-1 Overview of seven major classes of cell- stimulation may lead to activation of cytosolic protein kinases surface receptors discussed in this book. In many signaling that then translocate into the nucleus and regulate the activity of pathways, ligand binding to a receptor leads to activation of nuclear transcription factors. Some activated receptors, transcription factors in the cytosol, permitting them to translocate particularly certain G protein–coupled receptors, also can induce into the nucleus and stimulate (or occasionally repress) changes in the activity of preexisting proteins. [After A. H. Brivanlou transcription of their target genes. Alternatively, receptor and J. Darnell, 2002, Science 295:813.] process, is termed signal transduction. As we will see, signal- transduction pathways may involve relatively few or many 13.1 Signaling Molecules components. and Cell-Surface Receptors We begin this chapter with two sections that describe general principles and techniques that are relevant to most Communication by extracellular signals usually involves the signaling systems. In the remainder of the chapter, we con- following steps: (1) synthesis and (2) release of the signaling centrate on the huge class of cell-surface receptors that ac- molecule by the signaling cell; (3) transport of the signal to tivate trimeric G proteins. Receptors of this type, the target cell; (4) binding of the signal by a specific recep- commonly called G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs), tor protein leading to its activation; (5) initiation of one or are found in all eukaryotic cells from yeast to man. The more intracellular signal-transduction pathways by the acti- human genome, for instance, encodes several thousand vated receptor; (6) specific changes in cellular function, G protein–coupled receptors. These include receptors in the metabolism, or development; and (7) removal of the signal, visual, olfactory (smell), and gustatory (taste) systems, which often terminates the cellular response (see Figure many neurotransmitter receptors, and most of the receptors 13-1). The vast majority of receptors are activated by bind- for hormones that control carbohydrate, amino acid, and ing of secreted or membrane-bound molecules (e.g., hor- fat metabolism. mones, growth factors, neurotransmitters, and pheromones). 13.1 • Signaling Molecules and Cell-Surface Receptors 535 Some receptors, however, are activated by changes in the signal an adjacent cell by direct contact. Cleavage by an ex- concentration of a metabolite (e.g., oxygen or nutrients) or tracellular protease releases a soluble form of EGF, which by physical stimuli (e.g., light, touch, heat). In E. coli, for can signal in either an autocrine or a paracrine manner. instance, receptors in the cell-surface membrane trigger sig- naling pathways that help the cell respond to changes Receptors Activate a Limited Number in the external level of phosphate and other nutrients (see Figure 4-18). of Signaling Pathways The number of receptors and signaling pathways that we dis- Signaling Molecules in Animals Operate cuss throughout this book initially may seem overwhelming. Moreover, the terminology for designating pathways can be over Various Distances confusing. Pathways commonly are named based on the In animals, signaling by soluble extracellular molecules can general class of receptor involved (e.g., GPCRs, receptor ty- be classified into three types—endocrine, paracrine, or au- rosine kinases), the type of ligand (e.g., TGF␤, Wnt, Hedge- tocrine—based on the distance over which the signal acts. hog), or a key intracellular signal transduction component In addition, certain membrane-bound proteins act as signals. (e.g., NF-␬B). In some cases, the same pathway may be In endocrine signaling, the signaling molecules, called referred to by different names. Fortunately, as researchers hormones, act on target cells distant from their site of syn- have discovered the molecular details of more and more re- thesis by cells of the various endocrine organs. In animals, an ceptors and pathways, some principles and mechanisms are endocrine hormone usually is carried by the blood or by beginning to emerge. These shared features can help us make other extracellular fluids from its site of release to its target. sense of the wealth of new information concerning cell-to- In paracrine signaling, the signaling molecules released cell signaling. by a cell affect target cells only in close proximity. The con- First, external signals induce two major types of cellular duction by a neurotransmitter of a signal from one nerve cell responses: (1) changes in the activity or function of specific to another or from a nerve cell to a muscle cell (inducing or pre-existing proteins and (2) changes in the amounts of spe- inhibiting muscle contraction) occurs via paracrine signal- cific proteins produced by a cell, most commonly as the result ing (Chapter 7). Many growth factors regulating develop- of modification of transcription factors leading to activation ment in multicellular organisms also act at short range. Some or repression of gene transcription. In general, the first type of of these molecules
Recommended publications
  • Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in Cancer
    Oncogene (2010) 29, 5346–5358 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/10 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Extracellular adenosine triphosphate and adenosine in cancer J Stagg and MJ Smyth Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is actively released in the mulated the hypothesis of purinergic neurotransmission extracellular environment in response to tissue damage (Burnstock, 1972). Burnstock’s hypothesis that ATP and cellular stress. Through the activation of P2X and could be released by cells to perform intercellular P2Y receptors, extracellular ATP enhances tissue repair, signaling was initially met with skepticism, as it seemed promotes the recruitment of immune phagocytes and unlikely that a molecule that acts as an intracellular dendritic cells, and acts as a co-activator of NLR family, source of energy would also function as an extracellular pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes. messenger. Nevertheless, Burnstock pursued his work The conversion of extracellular ATP to adenosine, in and, together with Che Su and John Bevan, reported contrast, essentially through the enzymatic activity of the that ATP was also released from sympathetic nerves ecto-nucleotidases CD39 and CD73, acts as a negative- during stimulation (Su et al., 1971). Three decades later, feedback mechanism to prevent excessive immune responses. following the cloning and characterization of ATP and Here we review the effects of extracellular ATP and adenosine adenosine cell surface receptors, purinergic signaling is a on tumorigenesis. First, we summarize the functions of well-established concept and constitutes an expanding extracellular ATP and adenosine in the context of tumor field of research in health and disease, including cancer immunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid Metabolic Reprogramming: Role in Melanoma Progression and Therapeutic Perspectives
    cancers Review Lipid metabolic Reprogramming: Role in Melanoma Progression and Therapeutic Perspectives 1, 1, 1 2 1 Laurence Pellerin y, Lorry Carrié y , Carine Dufau , Laurence Nieto , Bruno Ségui , 1,3 1, , 1, , Thierry Levade , Joëlle Riond * z and Nathalie Andrieu-Abadie * z 1 Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Equipe Labellisée Fondation ARC, Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier, Inserm 1037, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, tgrCS 53717, 31037 Toulouse CEDEX 1, France; [email protected] (L.P.); [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (C.D.); [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (T.L.) 2 Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, CNRS, Université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier, UMR 5089, 205 Route de Narbonne, 31400 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 3 Laboratoire de Biochimie Métabolique, CHU Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.R.); [email protected] (N.A.-A.); Tel.: +33-582-7416-20 (J.R.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y These authors jointly supervised this work. z Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 23 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Simple Summary: Melanoma is a devastating skin cancer characterized by an impressive metabolic plasticity. Melanoma cells are able to adapt to the tumor microenvironment by using a variety of fuels that contribute to tumor growth and progression. In this review, the authors summarize the contribution of the lipid metabolic network in melanoma plasticity and aggressiveness, with a particular attention to specific lipid classes such as glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, sterols and eicosanoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives
    Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation de Andrade Mello, Paola, Robson Coutinho-Silva, and Luiz Eduardo Baggio Savio. 2017. “Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives.” Frontiers in Immunology 8 (1): 1526. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01526. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ fimmu.2017.01526. Published Version doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01526 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34493041 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA REVIEW published: 14 November 2017 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01526 Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives Paola de Andrade Mello1, Robson Coutinho-Silva 2* and Luiz Eduardo Baggio Savio2* 1 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 2Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Cancer is still one of the world’s most pressing health-care challenges, leading to a high number of deaths worldwide. Immunotherapy is a new developing therapy that Edited by: boosts patient’s immune system to fight cancer by modifying tumor–immune cells Salem Chouaib, interaction in the tumor microenvironment (TME).
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Signaling and Regulation of Metabolism Objectives
    Cell Signaling and Regulation of Metabolism Objectives By the end of this lecture, students are expected to: • Differentiate different steps in signaling pathways • Describe the second messenger systems • Recognize the function of signaling pathways for • Signal transmission • Amplification • Discuss the role of signaling pathways in regulation and integration of metabolism No cell lives in isolation • Cells communicate with each other • Cells send and receive information (signals) • Information is relayed within cell to produce a response Signaling Process • Recognition of signal – Receptors • Transduction – Change of external signal into intracellular message with amplification and formation of second messenger • Effect – Modification of cell metabolism and function General Signaling Pathway Signaling Cascades Recognition • Performed by receptors • Ligand will produce response only in cells that have receptors for this particular ligand • Each cell has a specific set of receptors Different Responses to the Same Signaling Molecule. (A) Different Cells Different Responses to the Same Signaling Molecule. (B) One Cell but, Different Pathways Hypoglycemia Glucagon secretion Hepatocyte: Glucagon/receptor binding Second messenger: cAMP Response: Enzyme phosphorylation P P Glycogen synthase Glycogen phosphorylase (Inactive form) (Active form) Inhibition of glycogenesis Stimulation of glycogenolysis GTP-Dependant Regulatory Proteins (G-Proteins) G-Proteins: Trimeric membrane proteins (αβγ) G-stimulatory (Gs) and G-inhibitory (Gi) binds to GTP/GDP
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulatory Role of Key Metabolites in the Control of Cell Signaling
    biomolecules Review The Regulatory Role of Key Metabolites in the Control of Cell Signaling Riccardo Milanesi, Paola Coccetti * and Farida Tripodi Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (F.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-6448-3521 Received: 8 May 2020; Accepted: 3 June 2020; Published: 5 June 2020 Abstract: Robust biological systems are able to adapt to internal and environmental perturbations. This is ensured by a thick crosstalk between metabolism and signal transduction pathways, through which cell cycle progression, cell metabolism and growth are coordinated. Although several reports describe the control of cell signaling on metabolism (mainly through transcriptional regulation and post-translational modifications), much fewer information is available on the role of metabolism in the regulation of signal transduction. Protein-metabolite interactions (PMIs) result in the modification of the protein activity due to a conformational change associated with the binding of a small molecule. An increasing amount of evidences highlight the role of metabolites of the central metabolism in the control of the activity of key signaling proteins in different eukaryotic systems. Here we review the known PMIs between primary metabolites and proteins, through which metabolism affects signal transduction pathways controlled by the conserved kinases Snf1/AMPK, Ras/PKA and TORC1. Interestingly, PMIs influence also the mitochondrial retrograde response (RTG) and calcium signaling, clearly demonstrating that the range of this phenomenon is not limited to signaling pathways related to metabolism. Keywords: Snf1/AMPK/SnRK1; Ras/PKA; TORC1; RTG; calcium; glucose; glycolysis; TCA; amino acids; protein-metabolite interaction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Membrane Receptors for Steroid Hormones in Cell Signaling and Nuclear Function
    Chapter 5 / Plasma Membrane Receptors for Steroids 67 5 Plasma Membrane Receptors for Steroid Hormones in Cell Signaling and Nuclear Function Richard J. Pietras, PhD, MD and Clara M. Szego, PhD CONTENTS INTRODUCTION STEROID RECEPTOR SIGNALING MECHANISMS PLASMA MEMBRANE ORGANIZATION AND STEROID HORMONE RECEPTORS INTEGRATION OF MEMBRANE AND NUCLEAR SIGNALING IN STEROID HORMONE ACTION MEMBRANE-ASSOCIATED STEROID RECEPTORS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE CONCLUSION 1. INTRODUCTION Steroid hormones play an important role in coordi- genomic mechanism is generally slow, often requiring nating rapid, as well as sustained, responses of target hours or days before the consequences of hormone cells in complex organisms to changes in the internal exposure are evident. However, steroids also elicit and external environment. The broad physiologic rapid cell responses, often within seconds (see Fig. 1). effects of steroid hormones in the regulation of growth, The time course of these acute events parallels that development, and homeostasis have been known for evoked by peptide agonists, lending support to the con- decades. Often, these hormone actions culminate in clusion that they do not require precedent gene activa- altered gene expression, which is preceded many hours tion. Rather, many rapid effects of steroids, which have earlier by enhanced nutrient uptake, increased flux of been termed nongenomic, appear to be owing to spe- critical ions, and other preparatory changes in the syn- cific recognition of hormone at the cell membrane. thetic machinery of the cell. Because of certain homo- Although the molecular identity of binding site(s) logies of molecular structure, specific receptors for remains elusive and the signal transduction pathways steroid hormones, vitamin D, retinoids, and thyroid require fuller delineation, there is firm evidence that hormone are often considered a receptor superfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular Metabolism
    CST SIGNALING PATHWAY DIAGRAMS FOR Cellular Metabolism Insulin Receptor Signaling © 2003–2015 Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Insulin Receptor SNARE TNF Glucose Complex GLUT4 p85 FlotillinCav PTEN PI3K Gab1 p110 SOCS3 Synip CAP TNFR1 Cbl PIP3 IRS Shc APS SHIP Akt2 SHP-2 PTP1B GLUT4 Crkll EHD1 GRB2 Nck Translocation TC10 C3G EHBP1 IRS-1 Crkll λ/ζ CIP4/2 PKC Fyn SOS PDK1 Rac1 mTORC2 PKCθ GRB10 Jnk GLUT4 PKCλ/ζ IKK vesicle Ras PP2A FFA 14-3-3 LKB1 NO iNOS GLUT4 AS160 Exocytosis Akt ROS c-Raf TBC1D1 AMPK PDK1 14-3-3 TSC2 PDE3B TSC1 Bad SIK2 GSK-3 PRAS40 Rheb [cAMP] MEK1/2 SGK Apoptosis SREBP CBP/p300 mTORC1 PKA Torc2 p70 Erk1/2 PP1 GS Lipin1 4E-BP1 S6K ATP-citrate Degradation ENaC lyase eIF4E HSL Glycogen Synthesis Protein Synthesis, Fatty Acid Growth, and SREBP-1 Sodium Synthesis Proliferation Lipolysis Transport Cytoplasm Erk1/2 SGK Akt2 Fatty Acid and Cholesterol Disruption of Nucleus Synthesis CBP/Torc2/CREB Complex FoxO3 FoxO4 FoxO1 Erk1/2 SREBP LXRα USF Gluconeogenesis Transcription Apoptosis, mTORC1 mTORC2 Autophagy, Lipin1 Glucose and Raptor Sin1 PRR5 GβL Lipid Metabolism Growth mTOR Rictor GβL DEPTOR mTOR DEPTOR Warburg Effect © 2010–2015 Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Macropinocytosis and other scavenging pathways Glycolysis Growth Factors Glucose Glucose Transporters Ras Hexokinase PI3K Amino Acids NADPH NADP Ras Pentose and Lipids c-Myc Phosphate 6-P- Glucose-6-P Akt Shunt Gluconolactone 6-P- MEK1/2 NADP Ras Amino Acids Gluconate TIGAR Fructose-6-P NADPH p53 LKB1 SREBP PFK Erk1/2 Ribulose-5P AMPK Fructose mTOR Bisphosphate Nucleotide
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Signaling 1- Cell Biology
    Cell Signaling 1- Cell Biology Dr Kirsty Walters [email protected] Objectives • Understand main types of signaling mechanisms • Understand concept of receptor and ligand • Understand membrane, cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors • Brief understanding of steroid hormone pathway • Brief understanding protein growth factor pathway • Understand differences between select membrane receptors (G protein structure, tyrosine kinases) Cell signaling basics Signal molecule Specific receptor Target cell Initiates a response in the target cell Signaling molecules and their receptors • Many different kinds of molecules transmit information between the cells of multicellular organisms. • These molecules act as ligands that bind to receptors expressed by their target cells. • There is considerable variation in the structure and function of the different types of molecules that serve as signal transmitters. • Some molecules carry signals over long distances, whereas others act locally to convey information between neighbouring cells. • Some signaling molecules are able to cross the plasma membrane and bind to intracellular receptors in the cytoplasm or nucleus, whereas others bind to receptors expressed on the target cell surface. Cell Communication • Cells in higher animals communicate by means of hundreds of kinds of signal molecules. • These include proteins, small peptides, amino acids, nucleotides, steroids, retinoids, fatty acid derivatives, and even dissolved gases such as nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. Contact Mediated Communication • display molecules on cell surface, recognized by receptor on another cell Non-Contact Mediated Communication • chemical signal, nearby or at a distance Modes of Signaling Direct Cell-Cell Signaling Direct cell contact Example - integrins and cadherins are cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). CAMs are located on the cell surface and are involved in binding with other cells or with the extracellular matric in the process called cell adhesion.
    [Show full text]
  • Pparγ Regulated Fatty Acid Metabolism Antibody Sampler
    PPARγ Regulated Fatty Acid Metabolism Antibody Sampler Kit Store at -20°C 3 n 1 Kit Orders n 877-616-CELL (2355) (7 x 20 µl) [email protected] Support n 877-678-TECH (8324) [email protected] Web n www.cellsignal.com rev. 06/16 #8660 For Research Use Only. Not For Use In Diagnostic Procedures. Storage: Supplied in 10 mM sodium HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 Products Included Product # Quantity Mol. Wt. Isotype mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml BSA, 50% glycerol and less than 0.02% Phospho-AMPKα (Thr172) (40H9) Rabbit mAb 2535 20 µl 62 kDa Rabbit IgG sodium azide. Store at –20°C. Do not aliquot the antibody. AMPKα (D5A2) Rabbit mAb 5831 20 µl 62 kDa Rabbit IgG Recommended Antibody Dilutions: CBP (D6C5) Rabbit mAb 7389 20 µl 300 kDa Rabbit IgG Western blotting 1:1000 Please visit www.cellsignal.com for validation data GCN5L2 (C26A10) Rabbit mAb 3305 20 µl 94 kDa Rabbit IgG and a complete listing of recommended companion PPARγ (C26H12) Rabbit mAb 2435 20 µl 53, 57 kDa Rabbit IgG products. SirT1 (C14H4) Rabbit mAb 2496 20 µl 120 kDa Rabbit IgG RXRα (D6H10) Rabbit mAb 3085 20 µl 53 kDa Rabbit IgG Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody 7074 100 µl Goat See www.cellsignal.com for individual component applications, species cross-reactivity, dilutions and additional application protocols. Description: PPARγ Regulated Fatty Acid Metabolism preferentially expressed in adipocytes as well as in vascular Source/Purification:Monoclonal antibodies are produced Antibody Sampler Kit provides an economical means to smooth muscle cells and macrophage (12).
    [Show full text]
  • Fatty Acid Oxidation Is a Dominant Bioenergetic Pathway in Prostate Cancer
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2006) 9, 230–234 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1365-7852/06 $30.00 www.nature.com/pcan REVIEW Fatty acid oxidation is a dominant bioenergetic pathway in prostate cancer Y Liu Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA Most malignancies have increased glycolysis for energy requirement of rapid cell proliferation, which is the basis for tumor imaging through glucose analog FDG (2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose) with positron emission tomography. One of significant characteristics of prostate cancer is slow glycolysis and low FDG avidity. Recent studies showed that prostate cancer is associated with changes of fatty acid metabolism. Several enzymes involved in the metabolism of fatty acids have been determined to be altered in prostate cancer relative to normal prostate, which is indicative of an enhanced b-oxidation pathway in prostate cancer. Increased fatty acid utilization in prostate cancer provides both ATP and acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA); subsequently, increased availability of acetyl-CoA makes acceleration of citrate oxidation possible, which is an important energy source as well. Dominant fatty acid metabolism rather than glycolysis has the potential to be the basis for imaging diagnosis and targeted treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2006) 9, 230–234. doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500879; published online 9 May 2006 Keywords: glycolysis; fatty acid metabolism; b-oxidation Introduction cells forms the theoretic basis for cancer detection through uptake of the glucose analog, fluorine-18-labeled Metabolic changes during malignant transformation 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (F18-FDG) with positron have been noted for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Communications Among Microorganisms, Plants, and Animals: Origin, Evolution, and Interplays
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Cell Communications among Microorganisms, Plants, and Animals: Origin, Evolution, and Interplays Yves Combarnous 1,* and Thi Mong Diep Nguyen 2 1 Physiologie de la Reproduction & des Comportements Laboratory, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique & Environnementale (INRAe), University of Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France 2 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Quy Nhon University, Quy Nhon City 55000, Binh Dinh, Vietnam; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-(0)-247427650 Received: 25 September 2020; Accepted: 27 October 2020; Published: 28 October 2020 Abstract: Cellular communications play pivotal roles in multi-cellular species, but they do so also in uni-cellular species. Moreover, cells communicate with each other not only within the same individual, but also with cells in other individuals belonging to the same or other species. These communications occur between two unicellular species, two multicellular species, or between unicellular and multicellular species. The molecular mechanisms involved exhibit diversity and specificity, but they share common basic features, which allow common pathways of communication between different species, often phylogenetically very distant. These interactions are possible by the high degree of conservation of the basic molecular mechanisms of interaction of many ligand–receptor pairs in evolutionary remote species. These inter-species cellular communications
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Evolution of Cell Signaling
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Conceptual Evolution of Cell Signaling 1, 1, 1, 2, Arathi Nair y , Prashant Chauhan y , Bhaskar Saha * and Katharina F. Kubatzky * 1 National Center for Cell Science (NCCS), Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India 2 Zentrum für Infektiologie, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (K.F.K.) Indicates Equal Contribution. y Received: 11 April 2019; Accepted: 28 June 2019; Published: 4 July 2019 Abstract: During the last 100 years, cell signaling has evolved into a common mechanism for most physiological processes across systems. Although the majority of cell signaling principles were initially derived from hormonal studies, its exponential growth has been supported by interdisciplinary inputs, e.g., from physics, chemistry, mathematics, statistics, and computational fields. As a result, cell signaling has grown out of scope for any general review. Here, we review how the messages are transferred from the first messenger (the ligand) to the receptor, and then decoded with the help of cascades of second messengers (kinases, phosphatases, GTPases, ions, and small molecules such as cAMP, cGMP, diacylglycerol, etc.). The message is thus relayed from the membrane to the nucleus where gene expression ns, subsequent translations, and protein targeting to the cell membrane and other organelles are triggered. Although there are limited numbers of intracellular messengers, the specificity of the response profiles to the ligands is generated by the involvement of a combination of selected intracellular signaling intermediates. Other crucial parameters in cell signaling are its directionality and distribution of signaling strengths in different pathways that may crosstalk to adjust the amplitude and quality of the final effector output.
    [Show full text]