<<

Wireless Link Budget

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 1 Link Budget Analysis Gain Ant Transmitter Loss Information Modulator Filter Feedline RF Propagation

Ant Receiver

Information Demodulator Pre-Amplifier Filter Feedline

Gain • A Link Budget analysis determines if there is enough power at the receiver to recover the information

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 2 Transmit Power Components • Begin with the power output of the transmit amplifier • Subtract (in dB) losses due to passive components in the transmit chain after the amplifier • Filter loss • Feedline loss • Jumper loss • Etc. • Add • dBi • Result is EIRP Ant Transmitter

Information Modulator Amplifier Filter Feedline RF Propagation

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 3 Calculating EIRP

All values are example values

Component Value Scale Power Amplifier 25 Watts 44 dBm Filter loss (0.5) dB Jumper loss (1) dB Feedline loss 150 ft. at 1dB/100 foot (1.5) dB Antenna gain 12 dBi

Total 53 dBm

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 4 Model

• Path loss is a reduction in the ’s power, which is a direct result of the distance between the transmitter and the receiver in the communication path. • There are many models used in the industry today to estimate the path loss and the most common are: • Free Space • Hata • Lee • Each model has its own requirements that need to be met in order to be utilized correctly. • The free space path loss is the reference point for the rest of the models used.

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 5 Free Space

• Used as the foundation for all propagation models. • Typically underestimates the path loss actually experienced for mobile communications. • Used extensively for predicting Point-to-Point, fixed, path loss. • It uses the following formula to calculate the loss experienced by a signal:

Free space path loss (dB): 20log10 f + 20log10 d -147.56

f in Hz, d in meters

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 6 Hata Model • Hata Model is used extensively in cellular communications. • Empirical Model based on Okumura’s data from Tokyo • Better estimates the path loss experienced as compared to Free Space. • Basic model is for urban areas, with extensions for suburbs and rural areas • Valid only for these ranges • Distance 1-20km • Base height 30-200m • Mobile height 1-10m • 150 MHz to 1500 MHz (note: some mobile bands are at 1900 MHz, so be careful)

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 7 Hata Model • Hata formula for urban areas:

• LH = 69.55 + 26.16log10fc – 13.82log10hb – a(hm) +

(44.9 – 6.55log10hb)log10R

• hb is the antenna height in meters. • hm is the mobile antenna height also measured in meters. • R is the distance from the cell site to the mobile in km.

• fc is the transmit frequency in MHz. • a(hm) is an adjustment factor for the type of environment and the hight of the mobile.

• a(hm) = 0 for urban environments with a mobile height of 1.5m. • See textbook p. 88 for suburban and rural extensions

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 8 Propagation Impairments

• Impairments result in signal loss that are added to the path loss. • Causes of impairments: • Morphology (general environment) • Obstructions (man made and natural) • Some propagation models incorporate Morphology impairments.

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 9 Morphology

• Morphology describes the general type of environment the signal will propagate through. • Major Classifications of Morphology: • Dense Urban • Urban • Suburban • Rural

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 10 Man-Made Obstructions

Man-made obstructions result in blockages, diffraction and reflection

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 11 Natural Obstructions • Numerous types of natural obstructions: • Mountains • Water • Ravines • Earth curvature

Obstructions result in both blockages and diffraction

Radio tower ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 12 Diffraction

• Results in bending of the wave. • Can occur in different situations when waves: • Pass through a narrow slit. • Pass the edge of a reflector. • Reflect off two different surfaces approximately one wavelength apart. • K-factor used in LOS calculations is a beneficial effect of diffraction of waves.

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 13 Received Signal Strength

• The purpose of transmission is to create a strong enough signal at the receiver • RSS – Received Signal Strength (usually in dBm) • RSS determined by: • + Transmit power • - Filter and feedline loss • + Transmit antenna gain • - Path loss (various models) • RSS can be measured as well

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 14 Receiver System Components

• The Receiver has several gains/losses • Specific losses due to known environment around the receiver • Vehicle/building penetration loss • Receiver antenna gain • Feedline loss • Filter loss • These gains/losses are added to the received signal strength • The result must be greater than the receiver’s sensitivity

Ant Receiver

Filter Pre-Amplifier Demodulator Information Feedline

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 15 Receiver Sensitivity • Sensitivity describes the lowest signal power level that the receiver is able to detect and decode • Sensitivity is determined by the lowest signal-to- noise ratio at which the signal can be recovered • Different and coding schemes have different minimum SNRs • Range: <0 dB to 60 dB • Sensitivity is determined by adding the required SNR to the noise present at the receiver • Noise Sources • Thermal noise • Noise introduced by the receiver’s pre-amplifier

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 16 Receiver Noise Sources • Thermal noise • N = kTB (Watts) • k=1.3803 x 10-23 J/K • T = temperature in Kelvin • B=receiver bandwidth

• N (dBm) = 10log10(kTB) + 30 • Thermal noise is usually very small for reasonable bandwidths • Noise introduced by the receiver pre-amplifier

• Noise Factor = SNRin/SNRout (positive because always generate noise) = Noise Figure • May be expressed linearly or in dB

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 17 Receiver Sensitivity Calculation • The smaller the sensitivity, the better the receiver • Sensitivity (W) = kTB * NF(linear) * minimum SNR required (linear) • Sensitivity (dBm) =

10log10(kTB*1000) + NF(dB) + minimum SNR required (dB)

10log10(kTB) + 30 + NF(dB) + minimum SNR required (dB)

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 18 Sensitivity Example

• Example parameters • Signal with 200KHz bandwidth at 290K • NF for amplifier is 1.2dB or 1.318 (linear) • Modulation scheme requires SNR of 15dB or 31.62 (linear) • Sensitivity = Thermal Noise + NF + Required SNR • Thermal Noise = kTB = (1.3803 x 10-23 J/K) (290K)(200KHz) = 8.006 x 10-16 W = -151dBW or -121dBm • Sensitivity (W) = (8.006 x 10-16 W )(1.318)(31.62) = 3.33 x 10-14 W • Sensitivity (dBm) = -121dBm + 1.2dB + 15dB = -104.8dBm • Sensitivity decreases when: • Bandwidth increases • Temperature increases • Amplifier introduces more noise

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 19 RSS and Receiver Sensitivity

• Transmit/propagate chain produces a received signal has some RSS (Received Signal Strength) • EIRP - path loss • For example : 50dBm EIRP – 130 dBm = -80dBm • Receiver chain adds/subtracts to this • For example, +5dBi antenna gain, 3dB feedline/filter loss à -78dBm signal into LNA of receiver • This must be greater than the sensitivity of the receiver • If the receiver has sensitivity of -78dBm or lower, the signal is successfully received.

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 20 Link Budgeting

• By modeling the full transmit/receive system we know: • Given a transmit power and mobile distance, what the power of the signal going into the receiver’s LNA will be (RSS+receiver gains/losses) • How much power is required at the receiver’s LNA (Sensitivity) • Link budgeting for a cellular system is the process of achieving balance of these • At the boundaries of the cell, received power should equal receiver sensitivity • Usually, a margin is added

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 21 When we care about link budgets

• For simple systems, we don’t care • Transmit at maximum legal power • No coverage à Receiver moves • For cell-based systems, we have to: • Provide continuous coverage over the entire region • Ensure transmitters in one cell don’t interfere with those in the closest cell that uses the same frequency • Consider reducing cell size in order to have more capacity through a larger number of cells

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 22 What we can change

• To achieve a balanced link budget within a given cell size we can: • Adjust transmit power • Adjust transmit tower height • Adjust transmit antenna gain • Modify the receivers • For planning a system we can use a link budget to: • Determine the cell size • Determine the frequency reuse ratio

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 23 Forward and Reverse Paths

• For two-way radio systems, there are two link budgets • Base to mobile (Forward) • Mobile to base (Reverse) • The system link budget is limited by the smaller of these two (usually reverse) • Otherwise, mobiles on the margin would have only one-way capability • The power of the more powerful direction (usually forward) is reduced so there is no surplus • Saves power and reduces interference with neighbors

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 24 Forward/Reverse Link Budget Example

• Forward (Base to Mobile) • Reverse (Mobile to Base) • Amplifier power 45dBm • Amplifier power 28dBm • Filter loss (2dB) • Filter loss (1dB) • Feedline loss (3dB) • Feedline loss (3dB) • TX Antenna gain 10dBi • TX Antenna gain 3dBi • Path loss X • Fade Margin (5dB) • Fade Margin (5dB) • Vehicle Penetration (12dB) • Vehicle Penetration (12dB) • Path Loss X • RX Antenna gain 3dBi • RX Antenna gain 10dBi • Feedline loss (3dB) • Feedline loss (3dB) • Signal into mobile’s LNA has • Signal into base’s LNA has strength 33dBm – path loss strength 17dBm – path loss • If Mobile Sensitivity is -100dBm • If Base Sensitivity is -105dBm • Maximum Path loss = 133dB • Maximum Path loss = 122dB Unbalanced – Forward path can tolerate 11dB more loss (distance) than reverse

ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 25 ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 26 ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 27 ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 28 ãSeattle Pacific University Link Budget No. 29