Hoober Ward Profile 2019 Description Hoober Lies in the North West of the Borough, with a Population of 14,510 (2017) and an Area of 2,732 Hectares

Hoober Ward Profile 2019 Description Hoober lies in the north west of the Borough, with a population of 14,510 (2017) and an area of 2,732 hectares. The ward contains the rural villages of Wentworth, Harley and Nether Haugh, as well as the much larger communities of Brampton and West Melton. The Manor Farm council estate, adjoining Rawmarsh, is also in the ward. The parishes of Wentworth (population 1,420) and Brampton Bierlow (population 4,350) cover most of the ward area.

Although most of Hoober ward is rural, the population is concentrated in the more urban areas and proportion of council renting is above average. Deprivation is low in Wentworth but there are some deprived pockets in Brampton and West Melton. Hoober ward features the large stately home of Wentworth Woodhouse and the surrounding parkland. The local landmark of Hoober Stand is located in the centre of the ward and is the highest point in Rotherham.

@Crown Copyright. Rotherham MBC Licence No. 100019587

Contents Page Population 2 Ethnic Group 2 Housing and Households 3 Employment, Benefits and Pensions 3 General Health and Disability 4 Lifestyles and Specific Health Issues 5 Education 6 Crime and Anti-social Behaviour 6 Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015 6 Population by Age

2017 Estimate Population Percentage Rotherham Average Aged 0-15 3,130 21.6% 19.3% Aged 16-24 1,330 9.2% 9.9% Aged 25-44 3,900 26.9% 24.2% Aged 45-64 3,780 26.1% 27.2% Aged 65+ 2,370 16.3% 19.4% Total 14,510 100% 100%

Population change since 2011: +2,259 (+18.4%) (Rotherham +2.4%)

Significant population growth in Hoober Ward since 2011 has resulted from new housing development which is also reflected in the higher than average proportion of children. Ethnic Group

2011 Census Population Percentage Rotherham Average White British 11,896 97.1% 91.9% Other White 136 1.1% 1.7% Mixed 78 0.6% 1.0% Asian 91 0.7% 4.1% Black 32 0.3% 0.8% Other 18 0.1% 0.5% Total 12,251 100% 100%

Only 2.9% of Hoober residents were from a BME community in 2011, well below the Borough average of 8.1%.

Housing and Households

Dwellings in 2018: 5,949 (5,379 in 2011), Households in 2018: 5,813 (5,216 in 2011)

The number of dwellings in Hoober has increased by 570 (+10.6%) since 2011 and there are an extra 597 households (+11.4%). These increases are lower than population growth (+18.4%) indicating a fall in average household size.

2011 Census Detached Semi Terraced Flats Total Owner Occupied 967 1,363 918 21 3,269 (63%) Social Rented 43 713 247 216 1,219 (23%) Private Rented 116 237 277 98 728 (14%) Total 1,126 (22%) 2,313 (44%) 1,442 (28%) 335 (6%) 5,216

Semis, detached and terraced houses all account for at least a quarter of owner occupied homes in Hoober, which are the majority of households. There are few flats, mostly social rented although 58% council houses are semi-detached.

Council Rented Properties in 2017: 1,238 (996 houses and 242 flats), 21.2% of dwellings

Employment, Benefits and Pensions

Employment by Industry

Employment by Workplace Number Percent Rotherham Located in the Ward (2017) Average Manufacturing & Production 280 6.7% 15.4% Construction 300 7.2% 7.9% Retail, Wholesale & Motor Trades 1,500 35.9% 15.3% Transport & Storage 350 8.4% 4.9% Accommodation & Catering 500 12.0% 5.8% Finance, Communications & Property 200 4.8% 4.6% Professional, Scientific & Technical 200 4.8% 6.8% Business Administration & Support 225 5.4% 8.8% Public Administration 150 3.6% 5.8% Education 150 3.6% 8.8% Health 250 6.0% 12.7% Arts, Entertainment, Leisure & Other 75 1.8% 3.4% Total 4,180 100% 100%

Total Employment by Workplace in 2017: 4,180 (4,708 in 2011) - 528

Hoober has a high proportion of local jobs in retail and wholesale, notably at Cortonwood. The ward still relies on opportunities elsewhere as local jobs were only sufficient for 76% of local workers in 2011.

Benefits and Pensions

DWP Benefits (2018) Number Percentage Rotherham Average Working Age Population (16-64) 9,019 - Employment & Support Allowance 545 6.0% 7.4% - Job Seekers Allowance 85 0.9% 1.5% - Income Support 115 1.3% 2.1% - Carers Allowance 292 3.2% 3.7% - Universal Credit 391 4.3% 1.9% Total on working age benefits 1,428 15.8% 16.6% State Pensioners 2,259 - Pension Credit 397 17.6% 16.3%

The proportion of working age people claiming benefits in Hoober is similar to the Rotherham average although pensioner poverty is higher than average.

Child Poverty 2016 (HMRC)

Children aged 0-15: 2,790 Children in low income families: 510 (18.3%) (Borough 21.8%, England 17%)

Child poverty in Hoober is below the Borough average but above the national average.

General Health and Disability

General Health bad or very bad (2011): 8% (Rotherham 7.6%, England 5.5%)

Limiting Long Term Illness or Disability (2011): 22.9% (Rotherham 22%, England 17.6%)

DWP Disability Benefits (2018) Number Percentage Rotherham Average - Attendance Allowance (aged 65+) 333 14.1% 13.6% - Disability Living Allowance (all ages) 625 4.3% 4.5% - Personal Independence Payment (16-64) 526 5.8% 6.6% Total on Disability Benefits 1,484 10.2% 11.1%

Hoober had slightly higher rates of poor health and disability than the Borough average in 2011 and much higher than the national average. Disability benefit claims are close to the Borough average.

Lifestyle and Specific Health Issues

Around 70% of health and lifestyle indicators are worse (have higher rates) than Rotherham average. However, only one indicator is significantly worse (deaths from all causes) and three indicators significantly better (emergency hospital admissions for coronary heart disease, children with excess weight (Year 6), and obese children (Year 6).

Compared to Rotherham average, Hoober ward is better for (has lower rates/less): obese and overweight children in Reception Year (aged 4-5) and in Year 6 (aged 10-11) (b); emergency hospital admissions for coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction (MI) (heart attack) (d); and hospital stays for alcohol- related harm (d).

In contrast, Hoober ward is worse for (has higher rates/more): hospital admissions for injuries in children and young people (15-24 years) (d); young people smoking (aged 11-17) (c); premature deaths (aged less than 75) particularly from circulatory disease and coronary heart disease (a), and deaths all ages particularly from CHD and respiratory diseases (a).

The Top 5 better and worse indicators are shown below (see Notes):

Better than Rotherham average Emergency hospital admissions for CHD (2011/12-2015/156) 84 (Rotherham 111) Obese and overweight children (aged 10-11) (2013/14-2015/16) 30% (Rotherham 35.7%, England 33.6%) Obese and overweight children (aged 4-5 years) (2013/14-2015/16) 19% (Rotherham 22.3%, England 22.2%) Emergency hospital admissions for myocardial infarction (MI) (2011/12-2015/16) 95 (Rotherham 110) Hospital stays for alcohol-related harm (2011/12-2015/16) 100 (Rotherham 111)

Worse than Rotherham average Deaths from all causes, all ages (2011-2015) 126 (Rotherham 113) Premature deaths** from coronary heart disease (2011-2015) 155 (Rotherham 116) Deaths from respiratory disease (all ages) (2011-2015) 150 (Rotherham 135) Hospital admissions for injuries in 15-24 year olds (per 10,000) (2011/12-2015/16) 138.5 (Rotherham 126.3, England 137.0) Regular smokers* aged 16-17 (2009-2012) 18.6% (Rotherham 16.8%, England 14.8%)

Notes Hospital admissions, cancer incidence and death rates are standardised to England (England = 100) A ratio less than 100 is relatively better, more than 100 is relatively worse. These are based on 5 years data to produce robust rates at ward level. Deaths and cancer incidence data based on 2011-2015, hospital admissions/stays 2011/12-2015/16. Data periods: (a) 2011-2015 (b) 2013/14-2015/16 (c) 2009-2012 (d) 2011/12-2015/16 (e) 2006-2008. Data represents persons all ages unless otherwise specified. *Modelled prevalence (based on socio-demographic profile and small area population data) **Persons aged under 75.

‘better’ and ‘worse’ based on differences over 10% from Rotherham average. Top 5 – Based on statistically significant or largest differences from Rotherham value. Ordering difficult due to comparing different measures (rates, percentages, ratios, life expectancy)

Education

Local Secondary School: Wath Comprehensive School (Local Authority)

Good Development at Age 5 - 2013/14: 62.9% (Rotherham 62.2%, England 60.4%)

Key Stage 2 Level 4 in Reading, Writing & Maths 2014: 76.4% (Rotherham 77%, England 78%)

5+ GCSE inc English & Maths - 2013/14: 54.3% (Rotherham 56.8%, England 56.6%)

Primary attainment in 2014 was typical of Rotherham but below the national average. However, Hoober was slightly below both averages for secondary attainment.

Highest Level of Qualification (2011 Census): Degree or diploma 18.2% (Rotherham 17.4%, England 27.4%) No Qualifications 30.4% (Rotherham 29.8%, England 22.5%) Crime and Anti-Social Behaviour (ASB)

Recorded Crime (2018/19): 1,251 (86.2 per 1,000 population) (Rotherham 98.6) Recorded ASB (2018/19): 306 (21.1 per 1,000 population) (Rotherham 24.3)

Rates of recorded crime and ASB in Hoober are slightly below the Rotherham average. Index of Multiple Deprivation 2015

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is a Government index for all areas in England. The 2015 index uses 37 indicators across 7 deprivation domains (themes) with a 2013/14 baseline. The IMD is only produced for Lower-level Super Output Areas (SOAs) of which there are 167 in Rotherham (around 8 per ward) and 32,844 in England, each with around 1,500 people. SOAs are ranked across England where 1 is the most deprived. Any rank below 3,285 indicates that an area is within the 10% most deprived areas of England.

@Crown Copyright. Rotherham MBC Licence No. 100019587

Deprivation in Hoober

Overall, deprivation in Hoober is similar to the Rotherham average but there are high levels in three areas. Manor Farm is the most deprived part of the ward, within the most deprived 10% of England. Parts of Brampton and West Melton are within the most deprived 20%. Wentworth and Harley are the least deprived parts of the ward although they are only slightly less deprived than the English average.

Indices of Deprivation 2015 Deprived of Income Persons Income Percent Rotherham Deprived Average All People 12,765 2,109 16.5% 18.7% Children aged 0-15 2,576 514 20.0% 24.3% Working Age 16-60/64 7,540 1,046 13.9% 16.6% Older People 60/65+ 2,772 548 19.8% 19.0%

Children and working age adults are less likely to be income deprived than the Borough average but older people are slightly more likely. This may reflect higher income residents under pension age moving into new housing contrasting with older residents in established communities.

SOA Code SOA Local Name IMD Score IMD Rank IMD Percentile E01007779 Manor Farm 46.5 2,878 9% E01007697 West Melton West 40.7 4,330 14% E01007694 Brampton North 34.4 6,390 20% E01006793 West Melton East 24.4 11,179 34% E01007695 Brampton South 16.8 16,892 52% E01007698 West Melton South 16.2 17,428 54% E01007696 Wentworth & Harley 15.9 17,760 55%

IMD data is not published for wards but the average IMD score in Hoober is 26.8 with an SOA equivalent rank of 9,839 which is within the 30% most deprived.

Data Sources

2011 Census, ward population estimates: Office for National Statistics Employment data: Business Register and Employment Survey, ONS (via NOMIS) Benefit data: Department for Work and Pensions (via NOMIS) Child poverty data: HM Revenue and Customs Local Health Indicators: Public Health England. For non-commercial use only. Hospital Admissions: Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) Modelled smoking prevalence estimates: University of Essex, Office for National Statistics and other sources. Mortality: Office for National Statistics.(ONS) Dwellings, households, council benefits, educational attainment: Rotherham MBC Crime and ASB: South Yorkshire Police Indices of Deprivation 2015: Department for Communities and Local Government

Office for National Statistics sources licensed under the Open Government Licence v.3.0.

Produced by Rotherham MBC

Policy & Partnerships: [email protected]

Public Health: [email protected]