Kiwi) Possess an Uro- Pygial Gland: Anatomy and Pathology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kiwi) Possess an Uro- Pygial Gland: Anatomy and Pathology ORIGINAL ARTICLE Eur. J. Anat. 21 (2): 125-139 (2017) Apteryx spp. (Kiwi) possess an uro- pygial gland: Anatomy and pathology Sian M. Reynolds 1,2 , Isabel Castro1, Maurice R. Alley 3, Susan J. Cunning- ham 4 1P.O. Box 11222, Institute of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2New Zealand Department of Conservation, Haast Awarua Field Centre. P.O. Box 50, Haast 7844, New Zealand, 3P.O. Box 11222, Institute of Veterinary, Animal and Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand, 4Percy FitzPatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa SUMMARY availability of uropygial gland secretion. This was supported by variations in live bird’s gland volume The uropygial gland is a prominent feature of the between two years of sampling. Atrophy of the uro- avian anatomy but there is limited information on pygial gland was seen in two birds in poor condi- its structure and function. The gland is of current tion suggesting that health impacts the functioning interest because it provides a source for volatile of the gland. This finding suggests an adaptive chemicals that can be used by birds in communi- significance for the gland and offers a possible cation. We examined the anatomy of uropygial way for birds to communicate their health status glands in Apteryx for the first time. The gland was through the production or composition of the se- located immediately caudal to the cloaca and sur- cretion. More research is needed to fully under- rounding the coccygeal bone rather than rostral to stand the relationship between the anatomy of the the coccygeal bone and above the posterior free gland in Apteryx and its function, but we propose caudal vertebrae as in other birds. This may ex- that it plays roles in both feather maintenance and plain why it has not been recognised until relatively sociality. recently. Like most uropygial glands Apteryx ’s were bilobar but possessed eight primary sinuses, Key words: Holocrine – Oil gland – Rump gland – each opening through its own orifice in the gland’s Preen gland – Integumentary gland – Apterygidae papilla. Primary ducts were compact and branches of connective tissue extending from the capsule inter- INTRODUCTION nally formed interfollicular septae that were thicker in some areas, grouping follicles into discrete lob- The uropygial gland, also known as the oil gland, ules. Striated muscle was present in the capsule, a rump gland or preen gland (Jacob and Ziswiler, characteristic so far unique to Apteryx that may be 1982; Sadoon, 2011), is one of only three integu- used in controlling the expulsion of secretion. mentary glands found in birds. These skin glands There were significant differences in the architec- are very few when compared to the array of integ- ture of the follicles between species and sexes that umentary glands of reptiles and mammals (Quay, suggest differences in the production, storage and 1972). The evolutionary origins of the uropygial gland are unknown. Homology between the uro- pygial gland and reptilian glands is uncertain (Elder, 1954), although there seem to be phyloge- Corresponding author: Isabel Castro. Institute of Agriculture netic relationships between uropygial gland secre- and Environment, Massey University, P.O. Box 11222, Pal- tions and secretions produced by some reptilian merston North, New Zealand. Phone: +64 6 3569099 ext. 84830; mobile: +64 274491261. E-mail: [email protected] Submitted: 21 September, 2016. Accepted: 11 January, 2017. 125 Apteryx uropygial gland integumentary glands (Quay, 1972). Histologically, secretion contained a chemical which actively at- the avian uropygial gland is most similar to the tracted males during the mating season, and thus mammalian sebaceous gland because of its holo- the composition of the secretion exhibited season- crine structure (Wagner and Brood, 1975; King ality. Likewise Hirao et al. (2009) found that the and McLelland, 1985; Sara et al., 2006). uropygial gland of female chickens ( Gallus gallus Externally, the uropygial gland is visible as an domesticus ) acts as a source of social odour cues. eminence generally located dorsomedially in the The uropygial gland secretion of blue petrels synsachrocaudal area, generally rostral to the py- (Halobaena caerulea ) has an individual signature gostyle and above the posterior free caudal verte- and is used in conspecific recognition (Mardon et brae (Jacob and Ziswiler, 1982). The organ is gen- al., 2011). Starlings ( Sturnus vulgaris ) can identify erally bilobate, with ducts leading from the secreto- the sex of conspecifics by using volatiles in their ry tissue to the papilla and reaching the surface of uropygial gland secretion (Amo et al., 2012). The the body through two or more orifices (Jacob and uropygial gland secretion can be used in cosmetic Ziswiler, 1982). The size, shape, number of circlet colouration ( Phoenicopterus roseus ; Amat et al., feathers, and proportions of the gland cells can 2011) or incorporate toxic, unpalatable, and foul vary greatly (Jacob and Ziswiler, 1982). The pa- smelling chemicals that the bird applies to its plum- renchyma is composed of small follicles with inter- age as a defence mechanism against predators twining ducts leading to primary sinuses. Second- (Martín-Vivaldi et al., 2009; Dumbacher et al., ary sinuses drain secretory product from follicles to 1992; Rajchard, 2010) or microbial parasites primary sinuses for storage (Lucas and Stetten- (Shawkey et al., 2003; Moyer et al., 2003; Chiale heim, 1972). In species in which the gland’s histol- et al., 2014, 2015). ogy has been studied it has four layers of cells To fully understand how the uropygial gland within each follicle (germinative, intermediate, se- works and the possible effect of phylogeny on its cretory and degenerative) (Jacob and Ziswiler, structure and function, it is necessary that we ex- 1982; Chandrasekar et al., 1990; El-Bargeesy et amine the uropygial gland of different bird groups al., 1995; Kale et al., 1999; Sunanda et al., 2001; histologically and through cytochemistry. Recent Sawad, 2006; Onal et al., 2013; Shafiian and Mo- studies for example are analysing information re- bini, 2014; Chiale et al., 2014; Chiale et al., 2016; garding the gland’s structure and chemical produc- Harem et al., 2010; Kozlu, 2011). Many features of tion with the function (Chiale et al., 2014; Chiale et this gland remain a mystery, for example its inner- al., 2015), habitat (Chiale et al., 2016), and phylog- vation, mode of secretion, and the expulsion of the eny of the study birds (Chiale et al., 2014). Of par- secretion from the papilla (Jacob and Ziswiler, ticular interest is the gland of Paleognathous birds 1982). as this group is basal to the entire Aves. Amongst Because of the oily nature of the secretion, wa- the ratites, only adult Apterygidae (five species) terproofing and maintenance of feathers were its and Tinamidae (c. 40 species) are known to have first postulated roles. However, research has uropygial glands (Johnston, 1988; Jacob and shown that the role of the uropygial gland and its Ziswiler, 1982). Interestingly, early authors did not secretion may vary greatly between species. Ex- realize that Apteryx had an uropygial gland until periments by Elder (1954) supported a feather Beddard (1899) examined the gland in three speci- maintenance role (Stettenheim, 2000): removing mens, one of each Apteryx australis , A. haasti and the uropygial gland in ducklings of two species, he A. Mantelli. Beddard (1899) described the gland as showed that the plumage of experimental birds enormous but did not consider it to be bilobar. He deteriorated with age, and survival decreased found that the papilla had two inconspicuous nip- compared to control birds, because the damage to ples and that these had two orifices each. No the plumage exposed them to injury and disease. measurements were taken or other descriptions Salibian and Montalti (2009) did not find any differ- made although the author provides an illustration ence in the size, degree of development of the of a ventral and lateral view of the uropygial gland gland and the bird’s relationship with water, sug- close to the cloaca. In this paper we provide the gesting that it may not have a role in waterproof- first detailed description of the anatomy, morpholo- ing. Giraudeau et al. (2010) experimentally gy, and histology of the uropygial gland of Apteryx , showed that when access to the uropygial gland and provide descriptions of some pathological was prevented for three months in a group of mal- changes that were observed in the uropygial gland lards ( Anas platyrhynchos ), their plumage showed of individuals of three Apteryx species. We discuss lower water-repellence compared to control birds. our findings in terms of the possible function of the Arguably, this may have resulted from deteriora- gland. tion of the plumage with disruption to the micro- structure of the feathers, which is the most com- MATERIALS AND METHODS monly proposed strategy for waterproofing. In some birds the secretion may be involved in External morphometry social cues; Kolattukudy and colleagues in 1987 We measured and photographed twice (in Febru- showed that the female mallard’s uropygial gland ary/March 2008 and March 2009) the uropygial 126 S.M. Reynolds et al. gland of a set of 29 (15 male and 14 female) wild buffered formalin. Each gland was cut in half sagit- brown kiwi ( Apteryx mantelli; all species follow tally between the two papillae (Fig. 1B). One half Burbidge et al. 2002) from Ponui Island, in the was used to produce three pieces: a midline trim- Hauraki Gulf, New Zealand (1770 ha; 36 55’, 175 ming and two lateral trimmings (Fig. 1B) with the 11’E). Nine additional birds (six females and three midline and outermost trimming used for data col- males) were sampled once in 2008. We recorded lection.
Recommended publications
  • The Secret Life of Wild Brown Kiwi: Studying Behaviour of a Cryptic Species by Direct Observation
    AvailableCunningham, on‑line Castro: at: http://www.newzealandecology.org/nzje/ Behaviour of wild brown kiwi 209 The secret life of wild brown kiwi: studying behaviour of a cryptic species by direct observation Susan J. Cunningham1, 2* and Isabel Castro1* 1Ecology Group, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University Private Bag 11‑222, Palmerston North, New Zealand 2Percy Fitzpatrick Institute, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa *Authors for correspondence (Email: [email protected] or [email protected]) Published on‑line: 21 March 2011 Abstract: Kiwi possess many unusual features that make them interesting subjects for behavioural study. However, their nocturnal, cryptic nature has meant that studies to date rely on data collected indirectly. Infrared technology has enabled us to observe kiwi directly and here we present the first study of wild brown kiwi (Apteryx mantelli) behaviour by direct observation. We used handheld infrared video cameras to obtain c. 6 hours of video footage of kiwi over 19 months. Kiwi used native forest and exotic pasture habitats while active at night and spent most of their time foraging (75%). Prey capture rates were significantly higher in pasture than forest. The remaining 25% of time was spent walking, vigilant, engaged in comfort behaviours, escaping disturbance, and investigating obstacles. Direct social and courtship interactions were observed rarely. The senses of hearing, olfaction and touch seemed most important to kiwi. Touch was used for investigating terrain and negotiating obstacles. Hearing was used in response to sounds made by observers, conspecifics and other sources. Olfactory search behaviours (OSBs) were used in the direction of these sounds, and olfaction was also apparently used to assess odours on the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Uropygial Gland in Birds
    UROPYGIAL GLAND IN BIRDS Prepared by Dr. Subhadeep Sarker Associate Professor, Department of Zoology, Serampore College Occurrence and Location: • The uropygial gland, often referred to as the oil or preen gland, is a bilobed gland and is found at the dorsal base of the tail of most psittacine birds. • The uropygial gland is a median dorsal gland, one per bird, in the synsacro-caudal region. A half moon-shaped row of feather follicles of the upper median and major tail coverts externally outline its position. • The uropygial area is located dorsally over the pygostyle on the midline at the base of the tail. • This gland is most developed in waterfowl but very reduced or even absent in many parrots (e.g. Amazon parrots), ostriches and many pigeons and doves. Anatomy: • The uropygial gland is an epidermal bilobed holocrine gland localized on the uropygium of most birds. • It is composed of two lobes separated by an interlobular septum and covered by an external capsule. • Uropygial secretory tissue is housed within the lobes of the gland (Lobus glandulae uropygialis), which are nearly always two in number. Exceptions occur in Hoopoe (Upupa epops) with three lobes, and owls with one. Duct and cavity systems are also contained within the lobes. • The architectural patterns formed by the secretory tubules, the cavities and ducts, differ markedly among species. The primary cavity can comprise over 90% of lobe volume in the Oilbird (Steatornis caripensis) and some woodpeckers and pigeons. • The gland is covered by a circlet or tuft of down feathers called the uropygial wick in many birds.
    [Show full text]
  • Ostrich Production Systems Part I: a Review
    11111111111,- 1SSN 0254-6019 Ostrich production systems Food and Agriculture Organization of 111160mmi the United Natiorp str. ro ucti s ct1rns Part A review by Dr M.M. ,,hanawany International Consultant Part II Case studies by Dr John Dingle FAO Visiting Scientist Food and , Agriculture Organization of the ' United , Nations Ot,i1 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-21 ISBN 92-5-104300-0 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without written permission of the copyright holders. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale dells Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. C) FAO 1999 Contents PART I - PRODUCTION SYSTEMS INTRODUCTION Chapter 1 ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF THE OSTRICH 5 Classification of the ostrich in the animal kingdom 5 Geographical distribution of ratites 8 Ostrich subspecies 10 The North
    [Show full text]
  • Grounded Birds in New Zealand
    Flightless Grounded Birds in New Zealand An 8th Grade Research Paper By Nathaniel Roth Hilltown Cooperative Charter Public School June 2014 1 More than half of the birds in New Zealand either can’t fly, can only partially fly, or don’t like to fly. (Te Ara) This is a fact. Although only sixteen species in New Zealand are technically flightless, with another sixteen that are extinct (TerraNature), a majority of more than 170 bird species will not fly unless their lives are threatened, or not even then. This is surprising, since birds are usually known for flying. A flightless bird is a bird that cannot fly, such as the well­known ostrich and emu, not to mention penguins. The two main islands southeast of Australia that make up New Zealand have an unusually diverse population of these birds. I am personally very interested in New Zealand and know a lot about it because my mother was born there, and I still have family there. I was very intrigued by these birds in particular, and how different they are from most of the world’s birds. I asked myself, why New Zealand? What made this tiny little country have so many birds that can’t fly, while in the rest of the world, hardly any live in one place? My research has informed me that the population and diversity of flightless birds here is so large because it has been isolated for so long from other land masses. Almost no mammals, and no land predators, lived there in the millions of years after it split from the Australian continent, so flying birds didn’t have as much of an advantage during this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex Recognition by Odour and Variation in the Uropygial Gland Secretion In
    1 Sex recognition by odour and variation in the uropygial gland secretion in 2 starlings 3 4 Luisa Amo1, Jesús Miguel Avilés1, Deseada Parejo1, Aránzazu Peña2, Juan Rodríguez1, 5 Gustavo Tomás1 6 7 1 Departamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, Estación Experimental de Zonas 8 Áridas (CSIC), Carretera de Sacramento s/n, E-04120, La Cañada de San Urbano, 9 Almería, Spain. 10 2 Instituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra (IACT, CSIC-UGR), Avda de las Palmeras, 11 4, 18100, Armilla, Granada, Spain. 12 13 *corresponding author: Luisa Amo. Departamento de Ecología Funcional y Evolutiva, 14 Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas (CSIC), Carretera de Sacramento s/n, E-04120, 15 La Cañada de San Urbano, Almería, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 16 17 18 Running headline: Odour-based sex recognition in a bird 19 20 2 21 1. Although a growing body of evidence supports that olfaction based on chemical 22 compounds emitted by birds may play a role in individual recognition, the possible role 23 of chemical cues in sexual selection of birds has been only preliminarily studied. 24 2. We investigated for the first time whether a passerine bird, the spotless starling 25 Sturnus unicolor, was able to discriminate the sex of conspecifics by using olfactory 26 cues and whether the size and secretion composition of the uropygial gland convey 27 information on sex, age and reproductive status in this species. 28 3. We performed a blind choice experiment during mating and we found that starlings 29 were able to discriminate the sex of conspecifics by using chemical cues alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequences of Two Extinct Moas
    letters to nature ................................................................. the small amounts of sequence data available, particularly for the Complete mitochondrial genome extinct moa. To resolve this issue we used ancient DNA techniques to generate sequences of two extinct moas contiguous sequences of the complete mitochondrial genomes of two moa genera, Emeus crassus and Dinornis giganteus, as a series of clarify ratite evolution 400±600 base-pair (bp) ampli®cations from subfossil bones 1,300± 1,500 years old (see Methods). Competitive polymerase chain reac- Alan Cooper*², Carles Lalueza-Fox*³, Simon Anderson*, tion (PCR) assays indicated that mtDNA was preserved at around Andrew Rambaut², Jeremy Austin§ & Ryk Ward* 0.3±1.5 million copies per gram of bone in the specimens, roughly three orders of magnitude higher than the Neanderthal (2,500± * Department of Biological Anthropology and Henry Wellcome Ancient 3,750 copies per g) and Ice Man DNA (8,600 copies per g), but Biomolecules Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 6UE, UK similar to some Hohokam mummies from the US southwest (2 ² Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 3PS, UK million copies per g)12,13. The high concentration of moa mtDNA ³ Seccio Antropologia, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, indicates that ampli®ed sequences are unlikely to be in¯uenced by Barcelona 08028, Spain damage to individual template molecules12,13. This was con®rmed by § Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, cloning experiments (Table 1) where sequencing discrepancies London SW7 5BD, UK occurred at rates comparable to modern taxa (,2 errors per .............................................................................................................................................. 1,000 bp) and consisted mainly of singletons.
    [Show full text]
  • Strigops Habroptilus)
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. The ecology and anatomy of scent in the critically endangered kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Zoology at Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand Anna Clarissa Gsell May 2012 Hoki, the kakapo - Photo by Dr. Luis Ortiz Catedral Kakapo chicks born in 2008;©Photo by Chris Birmingham ABSTRACT The focus of the research presented here is the analysis of feather scent emitted by a parrot, the kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) and the kakapo’s ability to perceive scent by studying the anatomy of its brain and the olfactory bulb. In addition, behavioural research was conducted to determine the capability of the kakapo’s closest relatives, the kea (Nestor notabilis) and kaka (N. meridionalis) to detect scents and to distinguish between different concentrations of scents. The strong odour of the kakapo is one of the many unique characteristics of this critically endan- gered parrot, but its sense of smell has never been described in detail. The kakapo is the largest par- rot worldwide, it is nocturnal and flightless. Kakapo are herbivorous and it is the only parrot with a lek breeding system. Males defend several display arenas during the breeding season and continu- ously produce low frequency booming calls. Females come from afar and appraise different males and choose one with which they want to mate.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Regulatory Evolution and the Origin of Flightlessness in Palaeognathous Birds
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/262584; this version posted February 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Convergent regulatory evolution and the origin of flightlessness in palaeognathous birds Timothy B. Sackton* (1,2), Phil Grayson (2,3), Alison Cloutier (2,3), Zhirui Hu (4), Jun S. Liu (4), Nicole E. Wheeler (5,6), Paul P. Gardner (5,7), Julia A. Clarke (8), Allan J. Baker (9,10), Michele Clamp (1), Scott V. Edwards* (2,3) Affiliations: 1) Informatics Group, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 2) Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 3) Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 4) Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA 5) School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, New Zealand 6) Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK 7) Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, New Zealand 8) Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA 9) Department of Natural History, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada 10) Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada *correspondence to: TBS ([email protected]) or SVE ([email protected]) bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/262584; this version posted February 8, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. The relative roles of regulatory and protein evolution in the origin and loss of convergent phenotypic traits is a core question in evolutionary biology.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parrot Apart: the Natural History of the Kakapo (Strigops Habroptilus), and the Context of Its Conservation Management
    A parrot apart: the natural history of the kakapo (Strigops habroptilus), and the context of its conservation management RALPH G. POWLESLAND Abstract Since the last review of kakapo biology, published 50 years ago, much Research, Development & Improvement has been learnt as a result of the transfer of all known individuals to offshore islands, Division, Department of Conservation, P.O. and their intensive management to increase adult survival and productivity. This Box 10-420, Wellington, New Zealand review summarises information on a diversity of topics, including taxonomy, plumage, [email protected] moult, mass, anatomy, physiology, reasons for decline in distribution, present numbers and status, sex ratio, habitat, home range, foraging activities, diet, voice, DON V. MERTON breeding biology, nesting success, sexual maturity, and adult survival. In addition, Honorary Research Associate, Research, those kakapo attributes that compromise its long-term survival in present-day New Development & Improvement Division, Zealand are discussed, along with management practises developed to overcome Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10- these problems. 420, Wellington, New Zealand Powlesland, R.G.; Merton, D.V.; Cockrem, J.F. 2006. A parrot apart: the natural JOHN F. COCKREM history of the kakapo (Strigops habroptilus), and the context of its conservation Conservation Endocrinology Research management. Notornis 53 (1): 3 - 26. Group, Institute of Veterinary, Animal & Biomedical Sciences, Massey University, Keywords Kakapo; Strigops habroptilus; Psittacidae; endangered species; review; Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, natural history; management practices; predatory mammals New Zealand INTRODUCTION The kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) is a large parrot (males 1.6 – 3.6 kg, females 0.9 – 1.9 kg) (Higgins 1999), with finely barred or mottled yellowish-green plumage.
    [Show full text]
  • Feather Mite Abundance Increases with Uropygial
    Ibis (2006), 148, 687–697 FeatherBlackwell Publishing Ltd mite abundance increases with uropygial gland size and plumage yellowness in Great Tits Parus major ISMAEL GALVÁN* & JUAN J. SANZ Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain Plumicolous feather mites are ectosymbiotic organisms that live on bird feathers. Despite their abundance and prevalence among birds, the ecology of the interaction between these organisms and their hosts is poorly known. As feather mites feed on oil that birds spread from their uropygial gland, it has been hypothesized, but never tested, that the number of feather mites increases with the size of the uropygial gland of their hosts. In this study the number of feather mites is considered with respect to uropygial gland size in a breeding popu- lation of Great Tits Parus major in order to test this hypothesis. As predicted, the number of feather mites correlated positively with the uropygial gland size of their hosts, showing for the first time that uropygial gland size can explain the variance in feather mite load among conspecifics. Previous studies relating feather mite load to plumage colour have suggested that feather mites may be parasitic or neutral. To confirm this, the yellowness of breast feath- ers was also assessed. However, the results ran in the opposite direction to that expected, showing a positive correlation between mite load and plumage yellowness, which suggests that further work is needed to give clear evidence for a specific nature of feather mites. How- ever, Great Tits with higher mite loads had lower hatching and breeding success, which may support the idea that feather mites are parasites, although this effect must be taken with caution because it was only found in males.
    [Show full text]
  • The Renaissance of Avian Paleontology and Its Bearing on the Higher-Level Phylogeny of Birds
    J Ornithol (2007) 148 (Suppl 2):S455–S458 DOI 10.1007/s10336-007-0159-8 REVIEW The renaissance of avian paleontology and its bearing on the higher-level phylogeny of birds Gerald Mayr Received: 12 February 2007 / Revised: 24 May 2007 / Accepted: 24 May 2007 / Published online: 20 June 2007 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2007 Abstract Recent phylogenetic analyses provide strong by only a few specialists and, unlike the situation in evidence for some previously undetected clades of mor- mammalogy (e.g., Novacek 1992; Asher et al. 2003; phologically very divergent avian groups. Also, within the Boisserie et al. 2005), fossil taxa are usually not considered past decades, palaeornithology has experienced a renais- in analyses of and discussions on the phylogeny of extant sance and the Paleogene fossil record of birds is avian taxa, other than calibrations of molecular clocks approaching that of mammals in the number of recorded (e.g., Cracraft et al. 2004; Livezey and Zusi 2007). Livezey higher-level taxa. However, there is still little mutual ex- and Zusi (2007, p. 4) even went as far as to note that fossil change between students of these different data, as birds ‘‘typically provide only substandard anatomical molecular systematists are often unfamiliar with the fossil material or incomplete specimens’’. Certainly, this is not record of birds, whereas palaeornithologists only recently true. Many Paleogene taxa are known from complete started to interpret their fossils in the light of modern skeletons which are often complemented by three-dimen- phylogenetic analyses. Here, this deficiency is remedied in sionally preserved isolated bones, and sometimes even a brief overview of some fossil ‘‘missing links’’ between exhibit remarkable soft-tissue preservation (e.g., Mayr extant higher avian groups, which combine derived char- 2005a, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Endangered Kiwi: a Review
    REVIEW ARTICLE Folia Zool. – 54(1–2): 1–20 (2005) The endangered kiwi: a review James SALES Bosman street 39, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 December 2004; Accepted 1 May 2005 A b s t r a c t . Interest in ratites has necessitated a review of available information on the unique endangered kiwi (Apteryx spp.). Five different species of kiwis, endemic to the three islands of New Zealand, are recognized by the Department of Conservation, New Zealand, according to genetic and biological differences: the North Island Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli), Okarito Brown Kiwi/Rowi (A. rowi), Tokoeka (A. australis), Great Spotted Kiwi/Roroa (A. haastii), and Little Spotted Kiwi (A owenii). As predators were found to be the main reason for declining kiwi numbers, predator control is a main objective of management techniques to prevent kiwis becoming extinct in New Zealand. Further considerations include captive breeding and release, and establishment of kiwi sanctuaries. Body size and bill measurements are different between species and genders within species. Kiwis have the lowest basal rates of metabolism compared with all avian standards. A relative low body temperature (38 ºC), burrowing, a highly developed sense of smell, paired ovaries in females, and a low growth rate, separate kiwis from other avian species. Kiwis have long-term partnerships. Females lay an egg that is approximately 400 % above the allometrically expected value, with an incubation period of 75–85 days. Kiwis mainly feed on soil invertebrate, with the main constituent being earthworms, and are prone to parasites and diseases found in other avian species.
    [Show full text]