<<

LETTERS

Emerging Human indiscriminately, and an expert commit- seum), some bacterial (e.g., tee decided to abandon these two terms legionellosis), and protozoan (e.g., pri- Infectious Diseases: and recommended “zoonoses” as “dis- mary amebic ). Anthroponoses, eases and which are naturally Intracellular parasites of (- transmitted between vertebrate animals es, rickettsiae, and ) cannot Zoonoses, and and man” (3). A limited number of be sapronotic agents. The term “saprono- Sapronoses zoonotic agents can cause extensive out- sis” was introduced in as a breaks; many zoonoses, however, attract useful concept (6–8). For these diseases To the Editor: The source of the public’s attention because of the high the expert committee applied the term has always been regarded as an utmost death rate associated with the infections. “sapro-zoonoses,” defined as “having factor in epidemiology. Human commu- In addition, zoonoses are sometimes con- both a vertebrate host and a nonanimal nicable diseases can be classified accord- tagious for hospital personnel (e.g., hem- developmental site or reservoir (organic ing to the source of infection as anthro- orrhagic ). Zoonotic diseases can matter, soil, and )” (3,9). However, ponoses (when the source is an infectious be classified according to the ecosystem the term sapronoses is more appropriate human; interhuman transfer is typical), in which they circulate. The classifica- because animals are not the source of zoonoses (the source is an infectious ani- tion is either synanthropic zoonoses, infection for humans. While anthro- mal; interhuman transfer is uncommon), with an urban (domestic) cycle in which ponoses and zoonoses are usually the and sapronoses (the source is an abiotic the source of infection are domestic and domains for professional activities of substrate, nonliving environment; inter- synanthropic animals (e.g., urban rabies, human and veterinary microbiologists, human transfer is exceptional). The cat scratch , and zoonotic ring- respectively, sapronoses may be the source of infection is often the reservoir ) or exoanthropic zoonoses, with a domain for environmental microbiolo- or, in ecologic terms, the where sylvatic (feral and wild) cycle in natural gists. The underdiagnosis rate for the etiologic agent of the disease normal- foci (4) outside human (e.g., sapronoses is probably higher than that ly thrives, grows, and replicates. A char- arboviroses, wildlife rabies, Lyme dis- for anthroponoses and zoonoses, and an acteristic feature of most zoonoses and ease, and ). However, some increase should be expected in both inci- sapronoses is that once transmitted to zoonoses can circulate in both urban and dence and number of sapronoses. humans, the chain is usually natural cycles (e.g., yellow and Legionellosis, , nontubercu- aborted, but the clinical course might be Chagas disease). A number of zoonotic lous mycobacterioses, and primary ame- sometimes quite severe, even fatal. An agents are arthropod-borne (5); others bic meningoencephalitis are a few ecologic rule specifies that an obligatory are transmitted by direct contact, alimen- sapronoses that have emerged in the past parasite should not kill its host to benefit tary (foodborne and waterborne), or decade. In addition, the number of from the adapted long-term , aerogenic (airborne) routes; and some opportunistic infections in immunosup- whereas an occasionally attacked alien are rodent-borne. pressed patients has grown markedly; host, such as a human, might be subject- Sapronoses (Greek “sapros” = decay- many of these diseases and some nosoco- ed to a severe disease or even killed rap- ing; “sapron” means in a decay- mial infections are, in fact, also idly by the parasite because no evolu- ing organic substrate) are human dis- sapronoses. tionary adaptation to that host exists (1). eases transmissible from abiotic environ- As with any classification, grouping In this letter, only microbial infections ment (soil, water, decaying plants, or ani- human diseases in epidemiologic cate- are discussed; metazoan invasion and mal corpses, excreta, and other substra- gories according to the source of infec- have been omitted. ta). The ability of the agent to grow tion has certain pitfalls. Some arthropod- Anthroponoses (Greek “anthrópos” = saprophytically and replicate in these borne diseases (urban , man, “nosos” = disease) are diseases substrata (i.e., not only to survive or con- dengue, epidemic , tickborne transmissible from human to human. taminate them secondarily) are the most relapsing fever, epidemic relapsing fever, Examples include rubella, smallpox, important characteristics of a sapronotic and ) might be regarded as diphtheria, , ringworm microbe. Sapronotic agents thus carry on anthroponoses rather than zoonoses (Trichophyton rubrum), and trichomoni- two diverse ways of life: saprophytic (in because the donor of the infectious blood asis. an abiotic substrate at ambient tempera- for the is an infected human and Zoonoses (Greek “zoon” = ) are ture) and parasitic (pathogenic, at the not a vertebrate animal. However, the diseases transmissible from living ani- temperature of a homeotherm vertebrate human infection is caused by an (inverte- mals to humans (2). These diseases were host). Typical sapronoses are visceral brate) animal in which the agent repli- formerly called anthropozoonoses, and mycoses caused by dimorphic fungi cates, and the term zoonoses is preferred. the diseases transmissible from humans (e.g., and histoplas- HIV is of simian origin with a sylvatic to animals were called zooanthro- mosis), “monomorphic” fungi (e.g., cycling among wild primates and acci- ponoses. Unfortunately, many scientists aspergillosis and cryptococcosis), certain dental infection of humans who hunted used these terms in the reverse sense or superficial mycoses (Microsporum gyp- or ate them; the human disease (AIDS)

Emerging Infectious Diseases • Vol. 9, No. 3, March 2003 403 LETTERS might thus have been regarded as a 4. Pavlovsky EN. Natural nidality of trans- other regions of the world, especially in in the very first phase but later missible diseases. Urbana (IL): Southeast Asia, low-level resistance to has spread in the human population as a University of Illinois Press; 1966. fluoroquinolones in spp. has typical anthroponosis and caused the 5. Beaty BJ, Marquardt WC, editors. The been observed for some time (4,5). present . Similarly, pandemic of disease vectors. Niwot (CO): After a lapse of almost 14 years, clus- University Press of Colorado; 1996. strains of developed through an ters of patients with acute bacillary 6. Terskikh VI. Diseases of humans and ani- from avian influenza A mals caused by microbes able to repro- were seen at the subdivisional . For some etiologic agents or duce in an abiotic environment that repre- hospital, Diamond Harbour, in eastern their genotypes, both animals and sents their living habitat (in Russian). India. No cases of dysentery had been humans are concurrent reservoirs (hepa- Zhurn Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol reported during the comparable period in titis virus E, Norwalk-like calicivirus, () 1958;8:118–22. previous years. A total of 1,124 case- enteropathogenic , 7. Somov GP, Litvin VJ. Saprophytism and patients were admitted from March Pneumocystis, Cryptosporidium, Giar- of pathogenic —eco- through June 2002. The startling feature dia, and Cyclospora); these diseases logical aspects (in Russian). Novosibirsk: of these infections was their unrespon- might conditionally be called anthropo- Nauka; 1988. siveness to even the newer fluoro- zoonoses. Other difficulties can occur 8. Krauss H, Weber A, Enders B, Schiefer quinolones such as norfloxacin and HG, Slenczka W, Zahner H. Zoonosen, 2. with classifying diseases caused by , the drugs often used to Aufl. Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag; sporulating bacteria ( and 1997. treat . Clinicians tried various Bacillus): Their infective spores survive 9. Schwabe CV. Veterinary and , mostly in combinations, in the soil or in other substrata for very human health. : Williams & without benefit. Clinicians also random- long periods, though they are usually pro- Wilkins; 1964. ly used anti-amoebic drugs without suc- duced after a vegetative growth in the abi- cess. otic environment, which can include ani- Address for correspondence: Zdenek Hubálek, An investigating team collected nine mal carcasses. These diseases should Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of fresh fecal samples from dysentery therefore be called sapronoses. For some Sciences, Klásterní 2, CZ-69142 Valtice, Czech patients admitted to this hospital; 4 other etiologic agents, both animals and Republic; fax: 420-519352387; e-mail: zhubalek@ (44%) yielded S. dysenteriae type 1 on brno.cas.cz abiotic environment can be the reservoir culture. For isolation of Shigella spp., (Listeria, Erysipelothrix, Yersinia pseudo- stool samples were inoculated into , Burkholderia pseudomallei, MacConkey agar and Hektoen Enteric and Rhodococcus equi), and the diseases agar (Difco, Detroit, MI), and the charac- might be, in fact, called saprozoonosis Multidrug-Resistant teristic colonies were identified by stan- (not sensu 9 ) in that their source can be dard biochemical methods (6). either an animal or an abiotic substrate. Subsequently, serogroups and serotypes For a concise list of anthropo-, zoo-, Type 1: Forerunners were determined by visual inspection of and sapronoses, see the online appendix slide agglutination tests with commercial available from: URL: http://www. of a New Epidemic antisera (Denka Seiken, Tokyo). cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol9no3/02-0208- in Eastern susceptibility testing was app.htm. performed by an agar diffusion disk India? method, as recommended by the Zdenek Hubálek* To the Editor: Multidrug-resistant National Committee for Clinical *Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic Shigella dysenteriae type 1 caused an Laboratory Standards (7). Results extensive epidemic of shigellosis in east- showed that the were resistant References ern India in 1984 (1). These strains were, to all commonly used antibiotics, includ- however, sensitive to nalidixic acid, and ing the fluoroquinolones (norfloxacin 1. Lederberg J. Infectious disease as an evo- and ciprofloxacin) but were sensitive to lutionary paradigm. Emerg Infect Dis clinicians found excellent results by ofloxacin. On our advice, the clinicians 1997;3:417–23. using it to treat cases. 2. Bell JC, Palmer SR, Payne JM. The Subsequently, in 1988 in Tripura, an used ofloxacin with good results. zoonoses (infections transmitted from eastern Indian state, a similar outbreak of A similar outbreak of S. dysenteriae animals to man). : Arnold; 1988. shigellosis occurred in which the isolated type 1 occurred in the northern part of 3. World Health Organization. Joint strains of S. dysenteriae type 1 were even West Bengal in eastern India among tea WHO/FAO expert committee on resistant to nalidixic acid (2). Since then, garden laborers from April 2002 to May zoonoses. 2nd report. WHO technical few cases of shigellosis have occurred in 2002; 1,728 persons were affected report series no. 169, Geneva; 1959. 3rd this region, and S. dysenteriae type 1 ( of 25.6%). Sixteen persons report, WHO Technical Report Series no. strains are scarcely encountered (3). In died. The isolated S. dysenteriae type 1 378, Geneva; The Organization; 1967. strains were found intermediately sensi-

404 Emerging Infectious Diseases • Vol. 9, No. 3, March 2003