Issue No. 3, December 2014 THE GREATER HORN QUARTERLY Tanzanian Perspectives
Bullish about regional integration
East Africa Kenya Sudan Coping with trauma? Karibu Kilimani Murky waters… The Greater Horn Quarterly Issue No. 3, December 2014
In this issue…
PANORAMA
The Tanzanian Surprise 2
COMMENTARY
Kenya: Bombs Away! 4
FEATURE SECTION
Let’s build one house! What do Tanzanians think about the EAC? 7
Tanzania 2025 - How optimistic are Tanzanians? 9
Bookworm: Through my African Eyes 12
REGIONAL FOCUS PANORAMA Trauma Land 14
Conflict Crazies 16 The Tanzanian Surprise How well do we inherently understand East African Countries? As BACK FROM THE FUTURE East African issues are being discussed or decided at regional organs Annexation! 21 of the East African Community (EAC), does the public truly know and comprehend the impact of integration? Digging for such COUNTRY FOCUS information based on properly researched evidence is always a good thing because of the likelihood of having to dispel existing KENYA: Karibu Kilimani 23 assumptions. That is what is beginning to happen in Tanzania UGANDA: Emergency following the Society for International Development’s (SID) Response 28 collaboration with Twaweza in the Tanzania Dialogues Initiative.
SUDAN: Murky Waters 30 Most perceptions of Tanzania and its citizens are a characterization of lukewarm attitudes towards integration initiatives. This BURUNDI: The Danger of perception is so prevalent that most of the reporting on Tanzanian Empty Bellies 34 feelings towards the “Coalition of the Willing” (COW) seemed to brand them as very unenthusiastic in progressing the integration TWEET INTERVIEW agenda that it was justified to let them (together with Burundi) #Mindspeak 36 catch up in future. Surprisingly, it emerged from the Sauti za Wananchi (Citizens’ Voice) survey conducted with Twaweza that 80 percent of Tanzanians believe fully in the East African integration process. The majority of those who had heard of the COW wanted to join it. So, if integration is so popular in Tanzania, is the problem its leadership or its bureaucracy?