October 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

October 2010 Appraisal of existing structures (Third edition) October 2010 Appraisal of Existing Structures.indd 1 22/10/2010 10:22 Membership of Task Group for third edition B C Bell MA MSc DIC CEng FIStructE FICE (Bell Johnson Ltd) Chairman C J Bolton BSc CEng FIStructE MICE (Sellafield Ltd) Vice Chairman K S K Chan BSc CEng MIStructE (Phoenix Consulting Engineers Ltd) S L Matthews BEng PhD CEng CSci FIStructE FICE MCIWEM (BRE) R Stagg BSc CEng FIStructE MICE (Conisbee Ltd) F E Weare MSc DIC CEng FIStructE MICE MIMMM DMS MIHT (Consultant) J G M Wood BSc PhD CEng FIStructE MICE FIAgrE (Structural Studies & Design Ltd) Secretary to the Task Group B H G Cresswell Riol BEng (Institution of Structural Engineers) Acknowledgements Thanks also to Dr Florian Block, Dr Chris Burgoyne, Mr Michael Bussell, Dr John Cairns, Mrs Ann Campbell, Mr George Faller, Mr Mike Grantham, Mr Michael Green, Dr Susan Halliwell, Mr Peter Harris, Mr Richard Harris, Mr Chris Holland, Mr Chris Jofeh, Mr Martin Kealy, Mr Michael Kightley, Mr Hirohisa Koga, Mrs Deborah Lazarus, Mr Ian Liddell, Dr John Menzies, Dr John Morlidge, Mr Ian Morrison, Mr Brian Neale, Mr Chris Newman, Dr Rupert Pool, Mr Clive Richardson, Mr Norman Seward, Dr Bob de Vekey and Dr Martyn Webb for their contributions. Membership of Task Groups for previous editions E Happold* RDI BSc DSc FEng FIStructE FICE FCIOB J H R Haswell†† BSc CEng FIStructE FICE Chairman to First and Second Editions R A Heaton CEng FIStructE FICE MIMuNE A P Backler BSC(Eng) DLC CEng MICE I J Hume DIC DiplConsAA CEng MIStructE J A Baird CEng FIStructE FIWSc P K Jaitly BSc MA LLB CEng FIStructE P R Bartle CEng FIStructE M Law BSc FIFireE W D Biggs§ QBE PhD CEng FIStructE FCIOB S L Matthews BEng PhD CEng CSCI FIStructE FICE MCIWEM W A Black MSc CEng MIStructE FICE FRICS J B Menzies FREng, PhD, BSc(Eng), FIStructE, DipCU P Beckmann MSc(Eng) CEng FIStructE MICE HonRIBA Vice-Chairman to Second Edition G A Bettany MSc CEng MIStructE FRICS R J W Milne‡ BSc Secretary to Second Edition J L Clarke MA CEng MICE R M Moss BSc PhD DIC CEng MIStructE MICE M S G Cullimore# BSc PhD CEng FIStructE F Myerscough CEng MIStructE R J Currie BSc(Eng) CEng FIStructE MICE A L Randall CEng FIStructE W G Curtin† MEng CEng FIStructE FICE W H Sharp CEng FIStructE D K Doran DIC BSc(Eng) CEng FIStructE FICE FCGI R Stagg BSc CEng FIStructE MICE D L Eckett A Stevens CEng FIStructE FICE R J Evans MA(Cantab) LLB CEng MICE MHKIE FCIArb R J M Sutherland FREng BA CEng FIStructE FICE K W Gibson BSc CEng MIStructE MICE Fritz Wenzel M G Green BE CEng MIStructE MICE C J K Williams MA PhD CEng MIStructE † deceased December 1991 †† deceased October 1994 * deceased January 1996 § deceased March 1998 ‡ deceased August 2002 # deceased April 2007 Published by The Institution of Structural Engineers International HQ, 11 Upper Belgrave Street, London SW1X 8BH Telephone: +44 (0)20 7235 4535 Fax: +44 (0)20 7235 4294 Email: [email protected] Website: www.istructe.org First published 2010 ISBN 978-1-906335-04-5 © 2010 The Institution of Structural Engineers The Institution of Structural Engineers and those individuals who contributed to the publication of all editions of this Report have endeavored to ensure the accuracy of its contents. However, the guidance and recommendations given in the Report should always be reviewed by those using the Report in the light of the facts of their particular case and specialist advice obtained as necessary. No liability for negligence or otherwise in relation to this Report and its contents is accepted by the Institution, the members of the Task Group, their servants or agents. In this Report, the words 'ensure', 'must' and 'should' are not intended to imply legal obligations but are intended to convey the weight of the advice given. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior permission of the Institution of Structural Engineers, who may be contacted at 11 Upper Belgrave Street, London SW1X 8BH. ii The Institution of Structural Engineers Appraisal of existing structures Appraisal of Existing Structures.indd 2 22/10/2010 10:22 Contents Tablesi v 3.14 Moisture ingress 18 3.14.1 Salt crystallisation 18 Glossary vii 3.14.2 Freezing 18 Foreword to the third edition ix 3.14.3 Organic degradation 18 3.15 Deleterious materials 18 1 Introduction 1 3.16 Fungal and insect infestation 19 1.1 Scope 1 3.17 Atmospheric conditions 19 1.2 Reasons for structural appraisal 1 3.18 Abrasion and erosion 19 1.3 Principles 1 3.19 Vandalism 19 1.4 Format of third edition 2 3.20 References 19 1.5 ‘Structural surveys’ 3 1.6 References 3 4 The appraisal process 22 1.7 Bibliography 3 4.1 General 22 4.2 Basic questions 22 2 The brief, legal implications and the report 4 4.2.1 Relevance of codes of practice 23 2.1 Introduction 4 4.2.2 Serviceability and structural safety 23 2.2 The brief 5 4.2.3 Acceptable level of risk 25 2.3 Commercial aspects 5 4.2.4 Limitations of calculations 25 2.4 Legal responsibilities 6 4.2.5 International standards 25 2.4.1 Introduction 6 4.3 Path of appraisal 25 2.4.2 Law of contract 6 4.4 Initial stage of appraisal (see Figure 4.5) 26 2.4.3 Law of tort 7 4.5 Second stage of appraisal (see Figure 4.6) 28 2.4.4 General 7 4.6 Third stage of appraisal (see Figure 4.7) 28 2.5 Appraisal findings 7 4.6.1 Principles behind third stage assessment 28 2.6 Report 7 4.6.2 Further on-site investigation work 31 2.6.1 Introduction 7 4.6.3 Composition of partial safety factors 32 2.6.2 Caveats 8 4.6.4 Rigorous analysis further to distribute the load 32 2.6.3 General considerations 8 4.7 Future performance 32 2.6.4 Practical aspects 8 4.8 Calculations requiring special consideration 32 2.6.5 Format 9 4.8.1 General 32 2.7 References 11 4.8.2 Brittle materials 33 2.8 Bibliography 11 4.8.3 Combined stresses 33 4.8.4 Fatigue 33 3 Preparation and influencing factors 12 4.8.5 Buckling 33 3.1 General 12 4.8.6 Connections 33 3.2 Desk study 12 4.8.7 Bolted and riveted connections 33 3.3 Reconnaissance and site inspection 12 4.8.8 Welded joints 34 3.4 Dimensions 13 4.8.9 Assessment of the effects of fire 34 3.5 Structural arrangements and materials of 4.8.10 Non code based assessments 34 construction 14 4.9 References 34 3.6 Condition 14 3.7 Actions and loadings 15 5 Testing and monitoring 35 3.7.1 Introduction 15 5.1 Commissioning of testing and monitoring works 35 3.7.2 Dead loads 15 5.2 Determination of testing and monitoring 3.7.3 Imposed loads 15 requirements 35 3.7.4 Storage loads 15 5.3 Simple on-site testing 37 3.7.5 Dynamic loads 15 5.4 Materials testing 38 3.7.6 Dynamic crowd loads 15 5.5 Load testing 43 3.7.7 Loads arising from machinery, appliances and 5.6 Monitoring of structures 43 equipment 15 5.7 References 43 3.7.8 Wind loads 16 3.7.9 Snow and ice loads 16 6 Use and properties of materials 44 3.7.10 Foundations 16 6.1 Introduction 44 3.7.11 Highway and railway loads 16 6.2 Masonry 44 3.7.12 Extreme events 16 6.2.1 Natural stone 44 3.7.13 Fire 16 6.2.2 Bricks and blocks 49 3.7.14 Earthquake loads 17 6.2.3 Mortars 51 3.7.15 Strains induced by fabrication, assembly, 6.2.4 Masonry construction 51 erection and movement 17 6.2.5 Strength of masonry, characteristic strength, 3.8 Lateral stability 17 c-factors 53 3.9 Soil pressures and ground movement 17 6.2.6 Other walling materials 54 3.10 Aggressive ground conditions 17 6.3 Timber 55 3.11 Thermal effects 18 6.3.1 General 55 3.12 Changes of humidity 18 6.3.2 Strength of timber, permissible stresses 56 3.13 Creep 18 6.3.3 Period of fire resistance 56 The Institution of Structural Engineers Appraisal of existing structures iii Appraisal of Existing Structures.indd 3 22/10/2010 10:22 Contents 6.4 Metals and alloys 57 7 Health and safety considerations 89 6.4.1 Ferrous alloys 57 7.1 Introduction 89 6.4.2 Brittle fracture 59 7.2 Risk management 90 6.4.3 Appraisal of structural ironwork and 7.3 Hazards 91 steelwork 60 7.4 UK legislation 91 6.4.4 Stainless steels 61 7.5 Personal protective equipment (PPE) 92 6.4.5 Aluminium alloys 62 7.6 Specialist training 93 6.4.6 Bronzes and brasses 63 7.7 Checklist – what the engineer should consider 93 6.4.7 Ropes and cables 64 7.8 References 93 6.5 Concrete 66 6.5.1 History of modern use 66 Appendix 1 Sources of UK-based information on design, 6.5.2 Identification 67 construction and history 95 6.5.3 Mechanical properties 67 A1.1 Introduction 95 6.5.4 Durability 67 A1.2 Building-specific information: primary sources 97 6.5.5 Plain (mass) concrete 67 A1.2.1 Points to note 97 6.5.6 Reinforced concrete 68 A1.3 Building-specific information: secondary sources 97 6.5.7 Prestressed concrete 69 A1.4 Explanatory information 98 6.5.8 Precast concrete 70 A1.4.1 Trade literature and Third Party Certification 98 6.5.9 Glassfibre reinforced concrete (GRC) 70 A1.4.2 Contemporary Codes of Practice 98 6.6 Steel/concrete composite construction 71 A1.4.3 Contemporary textbooks, papers, and 6.6.1 Definition and history of use 71 periodicals 99 6.6.2 Types and properties 71 A1.4.4 Guides to the identification and appraisal of 6.6.3 Appraisal of composite action 72 systems, products and particular structures 99 6.7 Polymeric materials 72 A1.5 Record sources 99 6.7.1 History of use 72 A1.5.1 Possible record sources 99 6.7.2 Identification 72 A1.5.2 National record centres for ancient monuments and 6.7.3 Mechanical properties 72 historic buildings 101 6.7.4 Durability 73 A1.6 Materials 102 6.8 Fibre-reinforced polymer composites 73 A1.7 Government agencies 103 6.8.1 History of use 73 A1.8 Other organisations
Recommended publications
  • Estrategias De Diseño Estructural En La Arquitectura Contemporánea El Trabajo De Cecil Balmond
    Tesis doctoral Estrategias de diseño estructural en la arquitectura contemporánea El trabajo de Cecil Balmond. Por Alejandro Bernabeu Larena Ingeniero de Caminos, Canales y Puertos Ingénieur des Ponts et Chaussées presentada en el Departamento de Estructuras de Edificación Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, 2007 Director: Ricardo Aroca Hernández-Ros Catedrático de Proyectos, Diseño y Cálculo de Estructuras III Departamento de Estructuras de Edificación Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Resumen Resumen. Si en épocas anteriores las posibilidades y los desarrollos arquitectónicos estuvieron marcados por condicionantes técnicos, constructivos y económicos, actualmente estos factores han dejado de ser determinantes, generando una situación de libertad arquitectónica prácticamente total en la que casi cualquier planteamiento formal puede ser resuelto y construido. El origen y desarrollo de nuevas formas estructurales y arquitectónicas en los siglos XIX y XX estuvo íntimamente ligado a la aparición de nuevos materiales y sistemas estructurales. En contraste, el origen de las formas fracturadas, informes y angulosas que caracterizan la arquitectura de finales del siglo XX y comienzo del XXI no se debe a la aparición de nuevos materiales, sino al extraordinario desarrollo tecnológico de las técnicas auxiliares de proyecto y ejecución, a la profundización del entendimiento estructural y a la mejora de las propiedades de los materiales estructurales conocidos, así como al menor peso que actualmente tienen los factores económicos en el proyecto. Este nuevo contexto arquitectónico ha modificado radicalmente los parámetros que rigen el papel de la estructura en el proyecto y la relación entre ingenieros y arquitectos, planteando la cuestión sobre si los ingenieros pueden y deben adoptar una posición creativamente activa, proponiendo nuevos sistemas y estrategias de diseño estructural que permitan guiar la nueva libertad formal adquirida por los arquitectos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Model As Means of Projective Inquiry in Structural Studies. the Paradigm of Architectural Education
    Research Collection Doctoral Thesis The Physical Model as Means of Projective Inquiry in Structural Studies. The Paradigm of Architectural Education. Author(s): Vrontissi, Maria Publication Date: 2018 Permanent Link: https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000290314 Rights / License: In Copyright - Non-Commercial Use Permitted This page was generated automatically upon download from the ETH Zurich Research Collection. For more information please consult the Terms of use. ETH Library DISS. ETH NO.24839 The Physical Model as Means of Projective Inquiry in Structural Studies. The Paradigm of Architectural Education MARIA VRONTISSI PROF. DR. JOSEPH SCHWARTZ PROF. DR. TONI KOTNIK ETH Zurich 2018 DISS. ETH NO.24839 THE PHYSICAL MODEL AS MEANS OF PROJECTIVE INQUIRY IN STRUCTURAL STUDIES. THE PARADIGM OF ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION A thesis submitted to attain the degree of DOCTOR OF SCIENCES of ETH ZURICH (Dr. sc. ETH Zurich) presented by MARIA VRONTISSI Dipl.Arch., National Technical University of Athens M.Des.S., Harvard University born on 04.06.1970 citizen of Greece accepted on the recommendation of PROF. DR. JOSEPH SCHWARTZ PROF. DR. TONI KOTNIK 2018 ‐ 1 ‐ ‐ 2 ‐ ABSTRACT Engaging in the discussion on the shortage of structural design creativity, the present study advocates for the potential of the physical model as a tool for conceptual structural studies (*) of a synthetic rationale. The work embraces a trans‐disciplinary mode of discourse, seeking to outline a theoretical framework and propose a relevant methodological means for the structural design inquiry. Within this context, fundamental concepts borrowed from design and visual studies are introduced across two representative case‐studies from the structural and architectural realm to highlight the synthetic component of structural studies and the conceptual aspect of the physical model.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Engineers
    OTHMAR AMMAN WILLIAM F. BAKER RICHARD BAUM ARCHITECTURAL HORST BERGER IRWIN CANTOR FIONA COUSINS ENGINEERS PETER FLACK ROGER FRECHETTE BUCKMINISTER OF THE 20TH & 21ST CENTURY FULLER DAVID GEIGER MYRON GOLDSMITH JOHN HENNESSY NORMAN KURTZ SILVIAN MARCUS MARVIN UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROJECT MASS LESLIE ROBERTSON HERBERT ROTHMAN SPRING 2008 HAND SCHOBER RICHARD ToMASETTI PAUL UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN COCKRELL SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING WEIDLINGER ALAN LOCKE JON MAGNUSSON JOHN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM A. MARTIN ERIN MCCONAHEY JOHN SKILLING OVE ARUP CECIL BALMOND GUY BATTLE PATRICK BELLEW EDMOND HAPPOLD ANTHONY HUNT HANIF KARA IAN LIDDELL TIM MACFARLANE CHRIS MCCARTHY PETER RICE NEIL THOMAS JANE WERNICK MARK WHITBY CHRIS WISE JACK ZUNZ KLAUS BOLLINGER JURG CONZETT MANFRED GROHMANN PIERRE LARDY ROBERT MAILLART CHRISTIAN MENN MARC MIMRAM FREI OTTO JORG SCHLAICH MATHIAS SCHULER WERNER SOBEK MICHEL VIRLOGEUX INTRODUCTION Architecture and engineering are in the midst of a technical revolution. Not since the advent of structural steel has there been such a dramatic shift in aesthetics, form and construction. The reason for this change in buildings is the recent evolution of computer design, analysis and construction software. Forms that were once impossible to imagine, let alone design and construct, are now possible. Engineers are playing an increasingly important role in this achievement. Of great interest to me as a university instructor teaching design to architectural engineering students, is a comprehensive chart (‘Engineer’s Atlas’) in the AR September issue listing the old and new famous names in Architectural Engineering of the last century. This is the first time that I have come across such a list and it occurred to me that this would be good material to share academically with faculty and students.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institution of Structural Engineers The
    CONFERENCE SPONSORED BY THE INSTITUTION OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS and THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR SHELL AND SPATIAL STRUCTURES CONFERENCE ADVISORY BOARD Dr Michael Barnes, Dr E. Hinton, Professor L. M. Ortega, The City University, University College of Secretary IASS, London, U.K. Swansea, Madrid, University of Wales, Spain, Dr Jan Bobrowski, Swansea, U.K. Jan Bobrowski and Partners, Twickenharn, U.K. Dr M. N. Pavlovic, Professor M Kawaguchi, Imperial College of Science Department of Architecture, and Techology, Dr J. W. Butterworth, Hosei University, Department of Civil London, Tokyo, U.K. Engineering, Japan. The University of Auckland, New Zealand. Peter Rice, Ian Liddell, Ove Arup & Partners, Dr J. F. Dickie, Buro Happold, London, Simon Engineering Bath, U.K. U.K. Laboratories University of Manchester, Professor Z. S. Makowski, Manchester, U.K. Space Structures Research Dr B. H. V. Topping, Department of Civil Centre, Brian Foster, University of Surrey, Engineering, Ove Arup & Partners, Guildford, U.K. University of Edinburgh, London, U.K. U.K. Dr R. E. McConnel, Professor J. Francois Gabriel, Professor Y. Tsuboi, School of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K. Tsuboi Institute, Syracuse University, Tokyo, New York, U.S.A. Japan. Dr S. J. Medwadowski, Professor John S. Gero, Consulting Structural Department of Architectural Engineer, George Wemyss, Science, San Franciso, Geospace Designs, Ltd., University of Sydney, California, Edinburgh, Sydney, Australia. U.S.A. U.K. PROCEEDINGS of THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION of NON-CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURES Volume 1 Edited by B. H. V. TOPPING published by 10 Saxe-Coburg Place E dinbu rgh O Civil-Comp Limited British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data International Conference on the Design and Construction of Non-conventional Structures (1987 : London).
    [Show full text]
  • The Arup Journal
    Issue 2 2016 The Arup Journal 1966 502016 Contents 4 1960s 50 2000s The Arup Journal is our ‘journal Snape Maltings Concert Hall Arup in Beijing York Minster The ‘Bird’s Nest’ of record’, documenting some of Emley Moor Tower The ‘Water Cube’ our more challenging projects and Concrete system building China Central Television (CCTV) HQ A1 Viaduct, Gateshead Beijing Airport Terminal 3 explaining how we approached them. Shahyad Aryamehr Beijing South station The focus on technical detail is a Beijing Convention Centre 14 1970s Channel Tunnel Rail Link hallmark of the publication and, in Sydney Opera House Hudson River Park my view, the reason for its longevity. Carlsberg Brewery Druk White Lotus School Byker Viaduct The Eden Project Since its launch in 1966, the Journal Centre Pompidou BedZED Bush Lane House Heathrow Terminal 5 has published more than a thousand OCBC Centre articles, whose common thread is Barbican Arts Centre 64 2010s Bundesgartenschau, Mannheim The Fulton Center the quality of the work, reflecting the London in 2012 creativity and calibre of the people 26 1980s Stratford and the Olympic Park HSBC Building, Hong Kong King’s Cross who worked on the projects. The British Library The Shard Lloyd’s of London Evelyn Grace Academy I would like to especially thank 1 Finsbury Avenue Leadenhall Building Stansted Airport Crossrail and acknowledge our clients and Ravenspurn North The Vegas High Roller collaborators who worked with us The Menil Collection Lake Mead Intake No.3 Lord’s Mound Stand Hong Kong’s waste-to-energy plant on the projects republished in this Singapore Sports Hub 50th anniversary edition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Average Best Solution
    The Average Best Solution A Generative Design Tool for Multi-Objective Optimization of Free- Form Diagrid Structures by Farzin Misami Azad A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Architecture Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2014. © Farzin Misami Azad 2014 AUTHOR’S DECLARATION iv I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. v ABSTRACT This research describes the generative modeling method implemented in an open-source program (Grasshopper) as a computational tool for performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization. It explores the initial steps of the design process to find the most fit design, based on goals defined by the designers, from among all possible solutions. In this context, this thesis uses the computational tool to propose a form-finding model for maximizing structural efficiency and constructability of diagrid structures with complex geometries. vi In architecture and related disciplines, such as structural engineering, the complexity of the both project and the defined goal, that is caused by several design variables and the myriad of relationships between them, play crucial roles in the design process. For the successful handling of such complicated design processes, the consideration of specific goals, requirements, and overall design quality is central. Therefore, this thesis addresses the need for identification and application of computational methods to effectively handle several issues in this design process: the complexity of parametric modeling of diagrid structures, of those computational modeling issues related to analyzing, evaluating, scoring the performance objectives, and of making the decisions needed for the process of multi- objective optimization.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Philosophy
    University of Bath MPHIL Geometry and Performance of Timber Gridshells Naicu, Dragos Award date: 2012 Awarding institution: University of Bath Link to publication Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. Oct. 2021 Geometry and Performance of Timber Gridshells By Dragos-Iulian Naicu Supervised by Dr. Chris Williams Prof. Richard Harris A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy The University of Bath Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering October 2012 Attention is drawn to the fact that copyright of this thesis rests with its author. A copy of this thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and they must not copy it or use material from it except as permitted by law or with the consent of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of a Grid Shell Structure with Fabric Formed Concrete Panels
    Die approbierte Originalversion dieser Diplom-/Masterarbeit ist an der Hauptbibliothek der Technischen Universität Wien aufgestellt (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at). The approved originalMEng version Membrane of this diploma or Lightweightmaster thesis is available Structure at the main library of the Vienna University of Technology (http://www.ub.tuwien.ac.at/englweb/). Design of a Grid Shell structure with fabric formed concrete panels A Master’s Thesis submitted for the degree of “Master of Engineering” supervised by Julian Lienhard Saqib Fazal Matrikel Nr. 1028479 Nairobi, October 14, 2012 Acknowledgements This master thesis is the culmination of a journey that began in 2004. I would like to thank the following people without whose support this document would have been impossible to produce: Prof Robert Wehdorn Roithmayr Julian Lienhard Juergen Holl Jurgen Hennicke Franz Rohm Johannes Kirnbauer Karl Deix Hubert Mayerhofer I would also like to thank my parents, brothers, wife and children for their continued support and patience with my academic efforts. Finally I would like to mention my office colleagues who acted as my sounding board, took an interest in my thesis and helped with some of the model making and testing. Nixon Mosomi Anthony Oloo 1 Abstract Very few timber grid shells exist around the world, despite their many advantages. The knowledge of designing, building and erecting grid shell structures is concentrated in very few people worldwide. Form finding, analysis and optimization are difficult. Erection also has many challenges – 2D plans cannot accurately describe 3D doubly curved forms. It is no surprise therefore that many architects and building professionals shy away from this particular building task.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHIGRAM MIT Sadler Fm* 12/20/05 10:03 AM Page Ii
    MIT Sadler_fm* 12/20/05 10:03 AM Page i ARCHIGRAM MIT Sadler_fm* 12/20/05 10:03 AM Page ii Archigram Architects (Peter Cook, Dennis Crompton, Ron Herron, partners), postcard, c. 1971, advertising Archigram Architects’ relocated office and Adhocs (Addhox) gallery in Covent Garden, London. Archigram Architects first opened in 1970 near the Architectural Association, confirming the ambition of some contributors to Archigram magazine to proceed from provocation to practice. Archigram Architects closed circa 1975. MIT Sadler_fm* 12/20/05 10:03 AM Page iii ARCHIGRAM ARCHITECTURE WITHOUT ARCHITECTURE SIMON SADLER THE MIT PRESS CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS LONDON, ENGLAND MIT Sadler_fm* 12/20/05 10:03 AM Page iv ©2005 MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. mit Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email [email protected] or write to Special Sales Department, The mit Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, ma 02142. This book was set in Chapparal and Magda Clean by Graphic Composition, Inc., and was printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sadler, Simon. Archigram : architecture without architecture / Simon Sadler. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. Contents: A new generation: Archigram’s formation and its context—The living city: Pop urbanism circa 1963— Beyond architecture: Indeterminacy, systems, and the dissolution of buildings—The zoom wave: Archigram’s teaching and reception—Conclusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué De Presse L'art De L'ingénieur
    Centre Georges Pompidou Direction de la communication Communiqué de presse L'art de l'ingénieur Constructeur, entrepreneur, inventeur Exposition Galeries Nord et Sud, Forum 25 juin-29 septembre 1997 Quelques manifestations internationales ont abordé au cours des dernières décennies, le monde de l'ingénierie, parmi lesquelles Twentieth Century Engineering au Museum of Modem Art de New York en 1964, Architecture d'ingénieurs, XIDfe et % e siècles au Centre Georges Pompidou en 1978, et, plus récemment Great Engineers au Royal College of Art à Londres en 1987 . Le Centre Georges Pompidou, dont la conception a été le fruit d'une collaboration très étroite entre ingénieurs et architectes, consacre, vingt ans après son ouverture au public, une grande rétrospective aux réalisations majeures des ingénieurs constructeurs depuis le milieu du XIXe siècle . Cette grande exposition investira l'ensemble des espaces du rez-de-chaussée : Forum haut et bas, Galeries nord et sud, soit environ 4000 m'. Dès l'entrée dans le Forum, le visiteur se trouvera confronté puis immergé dans le monde des ingénieurs grâce à la présence d'objets spectaculaires comme un dôme géodésique de Buckminster Fuller, la voûte du Pavillon de l'Aluminium de Jean Prouvé ou encore une structure tendue de Frei Otto. Notre perception a été programmée par les oeuvres de nouveaux créateurs, les ingénieurs des grandes structures qui donneront au siècle ses références . Les grandes serres, halles d'exposition, silos, ponts, hangars de dirigeables, plate-formes offshore : chacune de ces productions se révélera un puissant vecteur d'émotions nouvelles . La prouesse constructive, l'économie de matières et de moyens, l'intelligence des inventions techniques ont fait des ingénieurs les véritables possesseurs de l'émotion architecturale depuis la révolution industrielle .
    [Show full text]