DOCSLIB.ORG

Architectural Engineers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OTHMAR AMMAN WILLIAM F. BAKER RICHARD BAUM ARCHITECTURAL HORST BERGER IRWIN CANTOR FIONA COUSINS ENGINEERS PETER FLACK ROGER FRECHETTE BUCKMINISTER OF THE 20TH & 21ST CENTURY FULLER DAVID GEIGER MYRON GOLDSMITH JOHN HENNESSY NORMAN KURTZ SILVIAN MARCUS MARVIN UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH PROJECT MASS LESLIE ROBERTSON HERBERT ROTHMAN SPRING 2008 HAND SCHOBER RICHARD ToMASETTI PAUL UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN COCKRELL SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING WEIDLINGER ALAN LOCKE JON MAGNUSSON JOHN ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM A. MARTIN ERIN MCCONAHEY JOHN SKILLING OVE ARUP CECIL BALMOND GUY BATTLE PATRICK BELLEW EDMOND HAPPOLD ANTHONY HUNT HANIF KARA IAN LIDDELL TIM MACFARLANE CHRIS MCCARTHY PETER RICE NEIL THOMAS JANE WERNICK MARK WHITBY CHRIS WISE JACK ZUNZ KLAUS BOLLINGER JURG CONZETT MANFRED GROHMANN PIERRE LARDY ROBERT MAILLART CHRISTIAN MENN MARC MIMRAM FREI OTTO JORG SCHLAICH MATHIAS SCHULER WERNER SOBEK MICHEL VIRLOGEUX INTRODUCTION Architecture and engineering are in the midst of a technical revolution. Not since the advent of structural steel has there been such a dramatic shift in aesthetics, form and construction. The reason for this change in buildings is the recent evolution of computer design, analysis and construction software. Forms that were once impossible to imagine, let alone design and construct, are now possible. Engineers are playing an increasingly important role in this achievement. Of great interest to me as a university instructor teaching design to architectural engineering students, is a comprehensive chart (‘Engineer’s Atlas’) in the AR September issue listing the old and new famous names in Architectural Engineering of the last century. This is the first time that I have come across such a list and it occurred to me that this would be good material to share academically with faculty and students. Using this list, the students, T.A.’s and design professors this semester have produced nearly 60 concise research projects - one page documents - that introduce each of these accomplished engineers. Our goal is to provide a collection of introductions that a reader can flip thru quickly to familiarize themselves with the names of individuals and the architectural engineering firms that they founded. Some of the engineers are famous for their philosophical work as well as built work. All have created a legacy and have collectively elevated the respect for the importance of engineering in the design and construction of ambitious buildings. The “spectacular” architecture routinely featured in RECORD relies more than ever on the ingenuity, creativity, and yes, patience of the contemporary engineer. This species of professional, as much a creation of the modern era as anything else, now occupies a central place at the beginning of the design process, forever transforming how architecture relates to our cities, culture, and ourselves. I must write a short disclaimer warning that the research in this collection has not been thoroughly cross-checked and verified and I would not be surprised if you find even simple grammatical errors - please forgive us for that. We have assembled this research quickly to broaden your perception of Architectural Engineering. I’m sure that some very important engineers have been left out and I welcome you to correspond with me to provide names of those that you feel should be included or to point out Gregory Brooks, Lecturer any errors that we might correct in the pages. This information is not for commercial use and should only be used for academic Instructor for Architectural Engineering Design 1 & 2 courses purposes. Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural Engineering University of Texas at Austin Email: [email protected] -Gregory Brooks http://www.ce.utexas.edu/profile.cfm?profilePK=74 UT Austin, March 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS LONDON NEW YORK / CHICAGO OVE ARUP L-1 OTHMAR AMMAN NY/C-1 CECIL BALMOND L-2 WILLIAM F. BAKER NY/C-2 GUY Battle L-3 RICHARD BAUM NY/C-3 PatricK BELLEW L-4 HORST BERGER NY/C-4 EDMOND HAPPOLD L-5 Irwin Cantor NY/C-5 ANTHONY HUNT L-6 FIONA COUSINS NY/C-6 HANIF KARA L-7 PETER FLACK NY/C-7 IAN LIDDELL L-8 ROGER FRECHETTE NY/C-8 TIM Macfarlane L-9 BUCKMINISTER FULLER NY/C-9 CHRIS MCCarthY L-10 DAVID GEIGER NY/C-10 PETER RICE L-11 MYRON GOLDSMITH NY/C-11 NEIL THOMAS L-12 JOHN HENNESSY I NY/C-12 JANE WERNICK L-13 NORMAN KurtZ NY/C-13 MARK WHITBY L-14 SILVIAN MARCUS NY/C-14 CHRIS WISE L-15 MARVIN MASS NY/C-15 JACK ZUNZ L-16 LESLIE Robertson NY/C-16 Herbert ROTHMAN NY/C-17 HAND SCHOBER NY/C-18 EUROPE E-1 RICHARD TOMASETTI NY/C-19 KLAUS BOLLINGER E-2 PAUL WEIDLINGER NY/C-20 JURG CONZETT E-3 MANFRED GROHMANN E-4 PIERRE LARDY E-5 CHRISTIAN MENN E-6 PACIFIC RIM MARC MIMRAM E-7 FREI Otto E-8 ALAN LOCKE PR-1 JORG SCHLAICH E-9 JON MAGNUSSON PR-2 Mathias SCHULER E-10 JOHN A. Martin PR-3 WERNER SOBEK E-11 ERIN MCCONAHEY PR-4 MICHEL VIRLOGEUX JOHN SKILLING PR-5 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD - AUGUST - 2007 LONDON TechnicalTechnicalTechnical SydneySydneySydney Opera Opera Opera SpecializationSpecializationSpecialization OVEOVEOVE ARUPARUP ARUP ArupArup Arup HouseHouseHouse Sydney,Sydney,Sydney, Australia Australia Australia GeneralGeneralGeneral Categories Categories Categories OfficeOffice Locations LocationsOffice Locations – – Americas, Americas, – Americas, Austral Austral ia,Australia, East East ia,Asia, Asia, East Europe, Europe, Asia, Europe, Middle Middle EastMiddle East East WebsiteWebsiteWebsite - - http://www.arup.com/ http://www.arup.com/ - http://www.arup.com/ 19731973 1973 AcousticsAcousticsAcoustics FirmFirm Population PopulationFirm Population (2008) (2008) – (2008)– almost almost – 9000almost 9000 9000 AerodynamicsAerodynamicsAerodynamics R&DR&D R&D HistoryHistoryHistory MaterialsMaterialsMaterials Science Science Science CenterCenterCenter Georges Georges Georges FireFire and andFire Environmental Environmental and Environmental ArupArup Group GroupArup Ltd., GroupLtd., or or Ltd.,more more or simply simplymore Arup, simplyArup, is isArup, a a globally globally is a globally based based consulting basedconsulting consulting firm firm firm PompidouPompidouPompidou EngineeringEngineeringEngineering thatthat today todaythat offers offerstoday engineering, engineering,offers engineering, des design,ign, desplanning planningign, planning and and project project and projectmanagement management management StructuralStructuralStructural Engineering Engineering Engineering and and andconsultingconsulting consulting services. services. services. Structural Structural Structural engineer engineer engineer Ove Ove Arup Arup Ove founded founded Arup founded the the company company the company Paris,Paris, France FranceParis, France DesignDesignDesign namednamed namedOve Ove N. N. OveArup Arup N. Consulting ConsultingArup Consulting Engineer Engineer Engineers,s, in in 1946. 1946.s, in The1946.The firm firm The has has firm since since has since 19771977 1977 MechanicalMechanicalMechanical and and Electrical Electrical and Electrical changedchanged changed names names severalnames several severaltimes times and andtimes expan expan andded dedexpan tremendously tremendouslyded tremendously over over the the over past past the past InfrastructureInfrastructureInfrastructure 6060 years years60 with withyears offices offices with now officesnow in in 37 now37 countries. countries. in 37 countries. OtherOther Specialties: Specialties:Other Specialties: BornBorn ininBorn Newcastle,Newcastle, in Newcastle, U.K.,U.K., Sir SirU.K., OveOve Sir NyquistNyquist Ove Nyquist ArupArup began beganArup hisbeganhis educationeducation his education inin in philosophyphilosophyphilosophy and and mathematics mathematics and mathematics at at Copenhagen Copenhagen at Copenhagen University. University. University. He He later later He went went later on on went 30 30on St. St.30 Mary Mary St. Axe MaryAxe Axe ArchitectureArchitectureArchitecture toto receive receiveto receivean an engineering engineering an engineering degree degree degreeat at the the Technical Technicalat the Technical University University University of of Denmark. Denmark. of Denmark. London, London,London, England England England BridgesBridgesBridges OnceOnce graduatedgraduatedOnce graduated inin 19221922 in he he1922 beganbegan he workinbeganworking gworkin asas aa g structuralstructural as a structural engineerengineer engineer forfor for 20042004 2004 CivilCivil Engineering EngineeringCivil Engineering ChristianiChristianiChristiani andand Nielsen,Nielsen, and Nielsen, aa DanishDanish a Danish civilcivil engineeringengineering civil engineering firm,firm, and andfirm, movedmoved and moved toto to CommunicationsCommunicationsCommunications London.London.London. In In the the early Inearly the 1930’s, 1930’s,early 1930’s,he he worked worked he workedas as a a consultant consultant as a consultant to to the the Tectron toTectron the Tectron CorporateCorporateCorporate Resilience Resilience Resilience partnershippartnershippartnership wherewhere wherehehe workedworked he worked withwith senior seniorwith seniorpartnerpartner partner BertholdBerthold Berthold Lubetkin.Lubetkin. Lubetkin. ElectronicElectronicElectronic Data Data Management Management Data Management DuringDuring During thisthis time,time, this Ove Ovetime, ArupArup Ove applied appliedArup applied ststructuralructural st ructural concreteconcrete concrete ideasideas thatthatideas hadhad that had SystemsSystemsSystems nevernever been beennever done done been before before done in beforein residential residential in residential housing. housing. housing. After
Recommended publications
  • Miscellaneous Licenses for City Council Approval December 18, 2013 City Council Meeting Operator Licenses: 8 Total Owner Licenses: 0 Total

    Miscellaneous Licenses for City Council Approval December 18, 2013 City Council Meeting Operator Licenses: 8 Total Owner Licenses: 0 Total

    SPONSORED: SECONDED: CITY OF HOBOKEN RESOLUTION NO. __ RESOLUTION GRANTING KEITH KANDEL, ESQ. OF FLORIO KENNY SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY IN THE MATTER OF COONEY’S WORKER’S COMPENSATION LITIGATION IN AN AMOUNT UP TO THE AMOUNT SUGGESTED BY KEITH KANDEL TO MELLISSA LONGO IN AN EMAIL DATED OCTOBER 15, 2013 WHEREAS, the City of Hoboken is currently involved in a worker’s compensation claim with Plaintiff Cooney; and, WHEREAS, Keith Kandel, Esq. of Florio Kenny has represented the City’s legal interests in that matter, and has recommended a monetary amount for settlement of the matter by way of an email from Keith Kandel to Mellissa Longo dated October 15, 2013; and, WHEREAS, after legal guidance from Mr. Kandel, the City Council finds his suggested monetary settlement amount to be reasonable, and in the best interest of the City. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hoboken, that Keith Kandel, Esq. of Florio Kenny is hereby authorized to settle the matter of Cooney’s worker’s compensation claim in an amount up to the monetary amount suggested by Keith Kandel to Mellissa Longo in an e-mail dated October 15, 2013. Reviewed: Approved as to Form: Quentin Wiest Mellissa Longo, Esq. Business Administrator Corporation Counsel Meeting Date: December 18, 2013 Councilperson Yea Nay Abstain No Vote Ravi Bhalla Theresa Castellano Jen Giattino Elizabeth Mason David Mello Tim Occhipinti Michael Russo President Peter Cunningham SPONSORED: SECONDED: CITY OF HOBOKEN RESOLUTION NO. __ RESOLUTION GRANTING LOU MASUCCI, ESQ. OF WEINER LESNIAK SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY IN THE MATTER OF MUSSARO’S WORKER’S COMPENSATION LITIGATION (WC00365652) IN AN AMOUNT UP TO THE AMOUNT SUGGESTED BY VANESSA MENDELEWSKI TO MELLISSA LONGO IN HER EMAIL DATED NOVEMBER 26, 2013 WHEREAS, the City of Hoboken is currently involved in a worker’s compensation claim with Plaintiff Mussaro; and, WHEREAS, Lou Masucci, Esq.
  • 1960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of the Building Arts

    1960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of the Building Arts

    EtSm „ NA 2340 A7 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/nationalgoldOOarch The Architectural League of Yew York 1960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of the Building Arts ichievement in the Building Arts : sponsored by: The Architectural League of New York in collaboration with: The American Craftsmen's Council held at: The Museum of Contemporary Crafts 29 West 53rd Street, New York 19, N.Y. February 25 through May 15, i960 circulated by The American Federation of Arts September i960 through September 1962 © iy6o by The Architectural League of New York. Printed by Clarke & Way, Inc., in New York. The Architectural League of New York, a national organization, was founded in 1881 "to quicken and encourage the development of the art of architecture, the arts and crafts, and to unite in fellowship the practitioners of these arts and crafts, to the end that ever-improving leadership may be developed for the nation's service." Since then it has held sixtv notable National Gold Medal Exhibitions that have symbolized achievement in the building arts. The creative work of designers throughout the country has been shown and the high qual- ity of their work, together with the unique character of The League's membership, composed of architects, engineers, muralists, sculptors, landscape architects, interior designers, craftsmen and other practi- tioners of the building arts, have made these exhibitions events of outstanding importance. The League is privileged to collaborate on The i960 National Gold Medal Exhibition of The Building Arts with The American Crafts- men's Council, the only non-profit national organization working for the benefit of the handcrafts through exhibitions, conferences, pro- duction and marketing, education and research, publications and information services.
  • The Making of the Sainsbury Centre the Making of the Sainsbury Centre

    The Making of the Sainsbury Centre the Making of the Sainsbury Centre

    The Making of the Sainsbury Centre The Making of the Sainsbury Centre Edited by Jane Pavitt and Abraham Thomas 2 This publication accompanies the exhibition: Unless otherwise stated, all dates of built projects SUPERSTRUCTURES: The New Architecture refer to their date of completion. 1960–1990 Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts Building credits run in the order of architect followed 24 March–2 September 2018 by structural engineer. First published in Great Britain by Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts Norwich Research Park University of East Anglia Norwich, NR4 7TJ scva.ac.uk © Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts, University of East Anglia, 2018 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. A catalogue record is available from the British Library. ISBN 978 0946 009732 Exhibition Curators: Jane Pavitt and Abraham Thomas Book Design: Johnson Design Book Project Editor: Rachel Giles Project Curator: Monserrat Pis Marcos Printed and bound in the UK by Pureprint Group First edition 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Superstructure The Making of the Sainsbury Centre for Visual Arts Contents Foreword David Sainsbury 9 Superstructures: The New Architecture 1960–1990 12 Jane Pavitt and Abraham Thomas Introduction 13 The making of the Sainsbury Centre 16 The idea of High Tech 20 Three early projects 21 The engineering tradition 24 Technology transfer and the ‘Kit of Parts’ 32 Utopias and megastructures 39 The corporate ideal 46 Conclusion 50 Side-slipping the Seventies Jonathan Glancey 57 Under Construction: Building the Sainsbury Centre 72 Bibliography 110 Acknowledgements 111 Photographic credits 112 6 Fo reword David Sainsbury Opposite.
  • Circular Options for Building Services: Case Studies; 22 Gordon Street, Arup Circular Building Final Report: December 2018

    Circular Options for Building Services: Case Studies; 22 Gordon Street, Arup Circular Building Final Report: December 2018

    Circular options for building services: Case Studies; 22 Gordon Street, Arup Circular Building Final Report: December 2018 Ben Croxford (UCL), Ramon Mendoza (UCL), Simon-Joe Portal (Arup), Dimitrios Rovas (UCL) Project funders: The Bartlett Innovation Fund, and Arup UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering (IEDE), The Bartlett, UCL Faculty of the Built Environment Executive summary The circular economy concept has gained momentum over recent years, but few have analysed its application to the building services sector. This project aims to contribute to unravelling this opportunity (and its constraints) as a joint interest between UCL IEDE, UCL Estates, and Arup, to create useful guidelines for the industry. Building services fall within the ‘sweet spot’ for applying circular economy strategies. Some of the sector’s biggest issues such as; specialty equipment with high (upfront) costs, fast obsolescence, maintenance issues and costs, and the well-known performance gap can be dealt with by applying some of the strategies discussed in this report. Using the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s building blocks and ReSOLVE levers framework, the CIBSE TM56 report on Resource Efficiency in Building Services, and circular case studies found in the industry, this paper sets the base to understand the application of circular economy to building services. Two case studies are analysed: 22 Gordon Street, as a business-as-usual design and construction project with a standard RIBA stages process and The Circular Building by Arup, as a temporary test lab where circular strategies were tested and products assembled together and successfully dismantled at the end of use. Interviews were carried out with four decision-makers involved in the design of 22 Gordon Street and three in The Circular Building to understand the decisions (and reasons) that influenced the selection of certain building services and their circularity according to the previous literature guidelines reviewed.
  • Steel Focus 6

    Steel Focus 6

    FriDay 27/07/2012 in association with The british FriDay 27/07/2012 www.bdonline.co.uk 8 STEEL FOCUS STructuraL Steel Design awards 2012 constructional Steelwork 9 www.bdonline.co.uk Association and Tata steel seat building. Although the team fixed directly onto the outside AWARD considered using a steel arch, of the bowl, and seating terraces The Velodrome has distinctive it always favoured a cable-net were fixed directly to the inside cedar cladding and a lightweight Olympic double London 2012 roof solution, which had rarely with air-handling units inte- cable-net roof. been used in the UK on such a grated into the voids within the VELODRoME large scale. skeletal bowl structure. “Shrink- The structure consists of in- wrapping” the building envelope leads 2012’s Olympic Park, situ concrete for the lower bowl, on to the steel skeleton in this and structural steel for the cedar- way reduced the surface area and London clad upper bowl, topped by an cost of cladding. undulated steel perimeter ring The Velodrome achieved a steel winners Architect Hopkins Architects truss, which restrains the roof Breeam “excellent” rating, assist- Structural engineer cables. The cable-net includes 14 ed by its 29% recycled content, Expedition Engineering km of steel cable, with 36 main lightweight structure and use of Two of the sporting venues built for the cables arranged in pairs at 3.6m natural ventilation. Steelwork contractor centres. It is pulled down hard The judges were impressed by 2012 games are among the six top winners Watson Steel Structures Ltd on to the seating bowl structure the use of lean, sustainable de- for this year’s Structural Steel Design (Severfield-Rowen PLC) below, giving the venue its dis- sign to achieve an iconic sporting Main contractor ISG Construction tinctive roof form.
  • Successor Announced for Werner Sobek

    Successor Announced for Werner Sobek

    PRESS RELEASE Contact for press enquiries: Contact for business enquiries: Heike Bering, bering*kopal, Büro für Kommunikation Dr. Frank Heinlein Tel.: +49(0)711-7451-759-15 Tel.: +49(0)711-76750-38 [email protected] [email protected] Management changeover at ILEK – Successor announced for Werner Sobek Werner Sobek has left his desk well organized - Prof. Dr. Lucio Blandini is the new Director of the Institute for Lightweight Structures and Conceptual Design Who shall replace Werner Sobek when he leaves? The charismatic architect/ engineer and founder of the Institute for Lightweight Structures and Conceptual Design (ILEK) passed the ILEK managerial baton to his student Lucio Blandini in the spring of 2020. After more than 25 years of building up the Institute, Sobek will still be continuing his research and academic teaching roles at Stuttgart University, as well as acting as spokesman of the Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1244 until the end of the year. Prof. Dr. Blandini worked on his doctorate at ILEK, for which he constructed the iconic Stuttgart Glass Shell (‘Glashaus’) After studying architecture in the USA, Blandini returned to Stuttgart where he has been a board member of the Werner Sobek design company since 2018. 1 PRESS RELEASE Pioneering research and development in the design and construction of the man- made environment – whilst ensuring sustainability and keeping energy and material consumption to a minimum – have become synonymous with ILEK under the leader- ship of Werner Sobek. The same objectives will continue to define the future direc- tion of the Institute under its new management.
  • 070 Peters Books.Indb

    070 Peters Books.Indb

    HUGH WHITEHEAD, THE ORIGINS LARS HESSELGREN Of J PARRISH SMARTGEOMETRY Smartgeometry (SG) was founded in 2001 by former colleagues and friends Hugh Whitehead, Lars Hesselgren and J Parrish as a way to recapture parametric and computational design for architecture. At the time of founding SG they were leaders in the London-based architectural practices Foster + Partners, Kohn Pedersen Fox (KPF) and ArupSport respectively, and were strong proponents of digital design. Each was striving to create architecture through the use of parametric tools and computational methods. Through SG they hoped not only to create new digital tools, but to foster a community that would develop, test and disseminate these ideas of architecture and design to a wider audience. Whitehead founded the Specialist Modelling Group at Foster + Partners in 1998 which has been responsible for a host of innovative buildings and consistently pioneers computational design methods in architectural practice. After years at KPF in London, architect Lars Hesselgren is now the Director of the Computational Design Research Group at PLP Architects. J Parrish is a globally renowned sports stadium designer leading teams to design some of the most iconic stadium projects in the world. After many years at ArupSport, he moved to AECOM where he is currently working on the venues for the Rio Olympic Park. Here each tells their story of the origins of SG, now an international multidisciplinary community of professionals, academics and students in the fields of architecture and engineering.COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL 1 HUGH WHITEHEAD BACK TO THE FUTURE Four people were sitting in a car travelling to a Bentley conference.
  • Annual Report 2015/16

    Annual Report 2015/16

    Annual Report 2015/16 Purpose The aim of the Foundation is: ‘the advancement of education of the public directed towards the promotion, furtherance and dissemination of knowledge of matters associated with the built environment’. We pursue these, where possible, with an emphasis on ‘the multi‐disciplinary nature of design in engineering and architecture’. Chairman’s Statement The year 2015-16 has been very busy with both extensions of existing projects and developing ideas for new and potential projects. Inevitably not all the work developing projects is successful, but when it is it can be the result of many months of work. As well as activities that we have funded (listed at the end of this statement); we were very pleased to be able to extend MADE’s work again for the outstanding educational programme they are providing to make young people aware of a career in the Built Environment professions. We have agreed two other small projects and an agreement to part sponsor an Academic in Residence at the Institution of Civil Engineers to help inform decision making for global solutions. Our financial position is strong, in spite of the continuing economic pressures, and we enter the next year with confidence in continuing the pattern of supporting both short and long term projects. This year we held a Strategic Discussion workshop for about 50 invited guests: The Next 25 Years of The Ove Arup Foundation and we wish to thank everyone who attended for the valuable contributions that they made to make this day a success. We have prepared a report on the discussions and we will be developing and implementing the ideas in the immediate future.
  • (Jack) Zunz Was Born in Germany on the 25Th of December 1923

    (Jack) Zunz Was Born in Germany on the 25Th of December 1923

    Citation for the Degree of Doctor of Science in Engineering, honoris causa, Sir Gerhard Jacob Zunz Gerhard Jacob (Jack) Zunz was born in Germany on the 25th of December 1923. His family returned to South Africa while Jack was a young child and after matriculating at the end of 1941, he attended the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (Wits). Jack volunteered for military service in World War II, and from 1943, he interrupted his studies at Wits to join a South African artillery regiment, serving in Egypt and Italy. Although he claims not to be a courageous man, he joined because “my conscious would not forgive me if I didn’t”. On demobilisation in 1946, Jack resumed his studies in the Department of Civil Engineering at Wits and completed his BSc in Engineering as one of the illustrious “class of ’48” (They were mostly ex-servicemen). The degree was formally conferred at a ceremony in March 1949. He commenced work in the steel design and fabrication industry, but soon moved to London where he joined Ove Arup and Partners in 1950. The company, now one of the largest multi- disciplinary engineering design firms in the world, was still in its infancy, but the founder, Ove Arup, recognized the potential of young Jack. In 1954, Jack returned to South Africa to start the South African branch of Ove Arup. The firm was awarded the design of the Sentech Tower, commonly known as the Brixton Tower. This iconic structure on the Johannesburg skyline, which required state-of-the-art engineering in its day, is 237 m high and can resist winds of 200 km/hr, deflecting as much as 2 m without damage.
  • Structure and Architecture This Page Intentionally Left Blank Structure and Architecture Angus J

    Structure and Architecture This Page Intentionally Left Blank Structure and Architecture Angus J

    Structure and Architecture This Page Intentionally Left Blank Structure and Architecture Angus J. Macdonald Department of Architecture, University of Edinburgh Second edition Architectural Press OXFORD AUCKLAND BOSTON JOHANNESBURG MELBOURNE NEW DELHI Structure and Architecture Architectural Press An imprint of Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP 225 Wildwood Avenue, Woburn, MA 01801-2041 A division of Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd A member of the Reed Elsevier plc group First published 1994 Reprinted 1995, 1996, 1997 Second edition 2001 © Reed Educational and Professional Publishing Ltd 1994, 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright holder except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, England W1P 0LP. Applications for the copyright holder’s written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the publishers British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Macdonald, Angus J. Structure and architecture. – 2nd ed. 1. Structural design. 2. Architectural design I. Title 721 ISBN 0 7506 4793 0 Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record
  • Ove Arup & Partners International Limited

    Ove Arup & Partners International Limited

    United Nations Global Compact Communication on Progress 2015 www.arup.com United Nations Global Compact: Communication on Progress 2015 Contents − A. Introduction − B. Human Rights − C. Labour − D. Environment − E. Anti-Corruption − F. Community Engagement, Arup International Development and Partnerships Attachments − 1. Annual Report − 2. Global Human Rights Code of Practice − 3. Key Speech − 4. Global Harassment Code of Practice & UK Local Procedure − 5. Global Health & Safety Policy & OHSAS 18001:2007 − 6. UKMEA Regional Diversity Strategy − 7. Global Conduct and Performance Code of Practice − 8. Global Grievance Code of Practice & UK Grievance Procedure − 9. Global Diversity & Inclusion Code of Practice & UK Equal Opportunities Procedure − 10. Sustainability Policy Statement − 11. Sustainable Procurement Vision Statement − 12. Regional Sustainability Plan − 13. Business Backs Low Carbon Britain - Letter to 10 Downing Street − 14. Ethical Standards Policy, Ethics Global Code of Practice / Procedure & Ethical Decision Process A United Nations Global Compact: Communication on Progress 2015 A: Introduction 6 Arup Communication on Progress 2015 Arup Communication on Progress 2015 7 A Introduction Our independent ownership structure allows the needs of our clients, our commercial imperatives, and our conviction to influence all our decision-making, resulting in thoughtful contributions to society. Putting sustainability at the heart of our work is one of the Introduction to Arup ways in which we exert a positive influence on the wider world. Put simply, Arup people are driven to find a better Arup is a global company and the creative force at the heart way. of many of the world’s most prominent projects in the built environment. Accomplishments 2015 We have: Arup’s application for formal accreditation as a Living Wage Employer was recently approved by the Living Wage − approximately 13,000 people Foundation, making us one of the first 1,000 UK employers to make the pledge.
  • Are214b Building Structures Ib

    Are214b Building Structures Ib

    ARE214B BUILDING STRUCTURES I B CHENG HO YIU REX 193401515 B.Sc. Yr2 May 27, 2020 LIST OF BUILDING STRUCTURES LECTURE 1 – INTRODUCTION Portuguese National Pavilion Expo 98, Lisbon, Portugal. 1998 | Alvaro Siza | Cecil Balmond (Engineer) A minimalistic pavilion with a wide-spanning curved concrete canopy, fastened between the roofs of two rolls of vertical columns by steel cables embedded inside the thin layers of concrete, HSBC Headquarters, Central, Hong Kong. 1985 | Norman Forster | Ove Arup & Partners (Engineer) High-rise office with exoskeleton structure with steel trusses and floors suspended by tension columns that supported by eight main clustered columns, each composed of 4 connected steel tubes, to create the large column free atrium. Pont du Gard Roman Aqueduct, Nimes, France. 40-60 AD Three tier semi-circular arch structure built with stone using only friction and gravity to transfer water in ancient times. Exchange House Office Building, Dockland, London. 1996 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM) The 10-story office building is supported by external steel frame structure that is hold up primarily by four parabolic arches, two internal and two external, to provide a column-free and flexible open office design. Statue of Liberty, New York City, USA. 1886 | Gustave Eiffel | Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi (Sculptor) Structure ≠ Form | The neoclassical copper statue is sectioned into sheets of metal claddings which are attached to steel frames supported by four steel columns, is a gift from France to USA as a memorial to their independence. Greater Columbus Convention Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 1993 | Peter Eisenman Structure ≠ Form | The organic and irregular exterior is supported by convoluted structural frame that creates a strong juxtaposition with the convention centre’s large open interior.