The Lambeth Commission on Communion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Lambeth Commission on Communion The Lambeth Commission on Communion The Lambeth Commission on Communion was established by the Archbishop of Canterbury in October 2003, following the special Primates' Meeting called that month in Lambeth Palace to discuss developments in the Anglican Episcopal churches of North America, which were of a controversial nature. These pages set out the work of the Commission, their mandate, members, and submissions received The Commission reported to the Archbishop of Canterbury in October 2004, and issued its findings in the Windsor Report 2004. Mandate The Archbishop of Canterbury requests the Commission: 1. to examine and report to him by 30th September 2004, in preparation for the ensuing meetings of the Primates and the Anglican Consultative Council, on the legal and theological implications flowing from the decisions of the Episcopal Church (USA) to appoint a priest in a committed same sex relationship as one of its bishops, and of the Diocese of New Westminster to authorise services for use in connection with same sex unions, and specifically on the canonical understandings of communion, impaired and broken communion, and the ways in which provinces of the Anglican Communion may relate to one another in situations where the ecclesiastical authorities of one province feel unable to maintain the fullness of communion with another part of the Anglican Communion 2. within their report, to include practical recommendations (including reflection on emerging patterns of provision for episcopal oversight for those Anglicans within a particular jurisdiction, where full communion within a province is under threat) for maintaining the highest degree of communion that may be possible in the circumstances resulting from these decisions, both within and between the churches of the Anglican Communion 3. thereafter, as soon as practicable, and with particular reference to the issues raised in Section IV of the Report of the Lambeth Conference 1998, to make recommendations to the Primates and the Anglican Consultative Council, as to the exceptional circumstances and conditions under which, and the means by which, it would be appropriate for the Archbishop of Canterbury to exercise an extraordinary ministry of episcope (pastoral oversight), support and reconciliation with regard to the internal affairs of a province other than his own for the sake of maintaining communion with the said province and between the said province and the rest of the Anglican Communion 4. in its deliberations, to take due account of the work already undertaken on issues of communion by the Lambeth Conferences of 1988 and 1998, as well as the views expressed by the Primates of the Anglican Communion in the communiqués and pastoral letters arising from their meetings since 2000. Membership • Archbishop Robin Eames, Primate of All Ireland, Chairman • The Revd Canon Alyson Barnett-Cowan, Director of Faith, Worship and Ministry, Anglican Church of Canada • Bishop David Beetge, Dean of the Church of the Province of Southern Africa • Professor Norman Doe, Director of the Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University, Wales, • Bishop Mark Dyer, Director of Spiritual Formation, Virginia Theological Seminary, USA • Archbishop Drexel Gomez, Primate of the West Indies • Archbishop Josiah Iduwo-Fearon, Archbishop of Kaduna, the Anglican Church of Nigeria • The Revd Dorothy Lau, Director of the Hong Kong Sheng Kung Hui Welfare Council • Ms Anne McGavin, Advocate, formerly Legal Adviser to the College of Bishops of the Scottish Episcopal Church Ms McGavin resigned for personal reasons after the first meeting of the Commission. • Archbishop Bernard Malango, Primate of Central Africa • Dr Esther Mombo, Academic Dean of St Paul's United Theological Seminary, Limuru, Kenya • Archbishop Barry Morgan, Primate of Wales Archbishop Morgan was unable to be present at the first meeting of the Commission. • Chancellor Rubie Nottage, Chancellor of the West Indies Mrs Nottage was unable to be present at the second meeting of the Commission. • Bishop John Paterson, Bishop of Auckland, and Chair of the Anglican Consultative Council • Dr Jenny Te Paa, Principal of College of Saint John the Evangelist, Auckland, New Zealand • Bishop James Terom, Moderator, the Church of North India • Bishop N Thomas Wright, Bishop of Durham, the Church of England. Staff • The Revd Canon Gregory Cameron, Director of Ecumenical Affairs and Studies, Anglican Communion Office, Secretary to the Commission • The Revd Canon John Rees, Legal Adviser to the Anglican Consultative Council, Legal Consultant to the Commission Administrative Assistants • The Revd Terrie Robinson, Anglican Communion Office • Mrs Christine Codner, Anglican Communion Office Media • The Revd Brian Parker, Church of Ireland Press Office Documents For ease of use the documents section has been divided into three sections. Please click on the relevant section to go to those pages • Background & Supporting Documentation • Submissions to the Commission • Related articles and links Background & Supporting Documentation Background Documentation ACNS 3633 - A Statement by the Primates of the Anglican Communion view meeting in Lambeth Palace, 15-16 October, 2003 ACNS 3450 - The Pastoral Letter from the May 2003 Primates' Meeting in view Gramado, Brazil ACNS 2959 - Report from the April 2002 Primates' Meeting in Canterbury, view England ACNS 2410 - Pastoral Letter and Call to Prayer from the March 2001 view Primates Meeting in Kanuga, North Carolina, USA ACNS 2094 - Final Communiqué from the Primates Meeting, Portugal, view March 2000 Virginia Report 1996 view Statement issued on behalf of “the Primates of the Global South” view by Archbishop Peter Akinola, November 3rd, 2003 Statement of fourteen Anglican Primates of the Global South view Supporting Documentation Notes on presentation by Stephen Sykes Download Given to initial meeting of the Lambeth Commission, February 2004 Some Legal and Constitutional Considerations Download Paper by John Rees, submitted to the Primates Meeting, October 2003 Communion and Autonomy in Anglicanism: Nature and Maintenance Download Paper by Norman Doe Commissioning Commissions: a context for the work of the ABCC and IATDC? Download Paper by Philip Thomas Common Law: a fifth instrument of unity? Download Paper by Philip Thomas Ears to Hear?: why the Eames group will not be debating homosexuality Download Paper by Philip Thomas On Being Excommunicated: what does it mean to 'break off' communion? Download Paper by Philip Thomas Tuning up the Instruments of Unity: structures for Anglican decision- making Download Paper by Philip Thomas Decision-making Process in the communion of the Church Download Paper by Mary Tanner The Journey Forward Together: Reflections on Matthew 5:13-36 Download Paper Lynlea Rodger What is the Anglican Communion for? Download Paper by Chris Sugden Reflections offered to the Primates of the Anglican Communion Download from Inter-Anglican Theological and Doctrinal Commission Anglican Conciliarity: History, Theology and Practice Download Paper by Paul Avis Background Information Related to the Decision of the Diocese of New Westminster (Anglican Church of Canada) to Authorize the Download Blessing of Same Sex Unions Diocese of New Westminster Letter from the Presiding Bishop of ECUSA to the chairman of the Lambeth Commission (6 February 2004) Download from Frank Griswold Rite of Commissioning Download St George's House, Windsor, 9 February 2004 A Charge from Archbishop Rowan Williams Download Petition from Anglican Mainstream in support of the Network Download Human Sexuality: A Statement by the Anglican Bishops of Canada - 1997 Download Other Documents being considered that are not available online Grindrod Report, Women and the Episcopate, Parts B & C, 1987 To Mend the Net, Anglican Faith and Order for Renewed Mission, Gomez and Sinclair, Ekklesia Society, 2001 Claiming our Anglican Identity, Anglican Communion Institute, 2003 Submissions to the Commission Submissions Listed in Alphabetical Order Submission from the Executive Committee of Affirming Catholicism Download From North American Secretariat of Affirming Anglican Catholicism Download Submission from the Anglican Communion Institute View by Dr. Andrew Goddard Submission from the members of the Anglican Communion Institute (ACI) Download entitled 'Communion and Discipline' Submission from Tim Bradshaw View Submission from " Changing Attitude," the Lesbian and Gay Clergy Consultation and the Church of England View General Synod Human Sexuality Group Submission from The Church of England Evangelical Council (CEEC) Download Submission from 'Drawing the Line' View prepared by several bishops and theologians Submission from Fulcrum: Report Download Submission from Fulcrum: Appendix Download Submission from the Global South Consultation in Nassau Download 'Called to Witness and Fellowship' Submission from the Inter-Anglican Theological Doctrinal Download Commission (IATDC) Submission from the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement (LGCM) View Submission from the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement (LGCM) Download Submission from the Modern Churchpeople's Union Download Submission from the Central Trustees of the Worldwide Mothers' View Union Submission from Archbishop Njongonkulu Ndungane (CPSA) View 'The Life of the Anglican Communion: A way ahead', June 2004 Overview of submissions to the Lambeth Commission from groups and individuals received between 12 June and 3 View September 2004 Submission from Mary Reath View Résumé of submissions by individuals
Recommended publications
  • The Making of an Evangelical Tory: the Seventh Earl of Shaftesbury (1801-1885) and the Evolving Character of Victorian Evangelicalism
    The Making of an Evangelical Tory: The Seventh Earl of Shaftesbury (1801-1885) and the Evolving Character of Victorian Evangelicalism David Andrew Barton Furse-Roberts A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy UNSW School of Humanities & Languages Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences November 2015 CONTENTS Page Abstract i Abbreviations ii Acknowledgements iii Introduction I Part I: Locating Anthony Ashley Cooper within the Anglican Evangelical tradition 1 1.1 Ashley’s expression of Evangelicalism 2 1.2 How the associations and leaders of Anglican Evangelicalism shaped the evolving 32 religious temperament of Ashley. 1.3 Conclusion: A son of the Clapham Sect or a brother of the Recordites? 64 Part II: A just estimate of rank and property: Locating Ashley’s place within the 67 tradition of paternalism 2.1 Identifying the character of Ashley’s paternalism 68 2.2 How Tory paternalist ideas influenced the emerging consciousness of Ashley in the 88 pre-Victorian era 2.3 The place of Ashley’s paternalism within the British Tory and Whig traditions 132 2.4 Conclusion: Paternalism in the ‘name of the people’ 144 Part III: Something admirably patrician in his estimation of Christianity: Ashley 147 and the emerging synthesis between Evangelicalism and Tory paternalism 3.1 Common ground forged between Tory paternalism and early Victorian Evangelicalism 148 3.2 Ashley and the factory reform movement: Project of Tory paternalism or 203 by-product of Evangelical social concern? 3.3 The coalescence of these two belief systems in the emerging political philosophy of 230 Ashley 3.4 Conclusion: Making Evangelicalism a patrician creed 237 Part IV: Ashley and the milieux of Victorian Evangelicalism 240 4.1 Locating Ashley’s place within the Victorian Evangelical Terrain 242 4.2 Thy kingdom come, thy will be done: The premillennial eschatology and 255 Evangelical activism of Ashley 4.3 Desire for the nations: Ashley and Victorian Evangelical attitudes to imperialism, 264 race and the ‘Jewish question’.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion
    A (New) Ecclesiology of the Anglican Communion: Rediscovering the Radical and Transnational Nature of the Anglican Communion Guillermo René Cavieses Araya Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Faculty of Arts School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science February 2019 1 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from this thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2019 The University of Leeds and Guillermo René Cavieses Araya The right of Guillermo René Cavieses Araya to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by Guillermo René Cavieses Araya in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. 2 Acknowledgements No man is an island, and neither is his work. This thesis would not have been possible without the contribution of a lot of people, going a long way back. So, let’s start at the beginning. Mum, thank you for teaching me that it was OK for me to dream of working for a circus when I was little, so long as I first went to University to get a degree on it. Dad, thanks for teaching me the value of books and a solid right hook. To my other Dad, thank you for teaching me the virtue of patience (yes, I know, I am still working on that one).
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 V Olume 89 Number 1 March 2020
    Volume 89 Volume Number 1 March 2020 Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 Historical Society of the Episcopal Church Benefactors ($500 or more) President Dr. F. W. Gerbracht, Jr. Wantagh, NY Robyn M. Neville, St. Mark’s School, Fort Lauderdale, Florida William H. Gleason Wheat Ridge, CO 1st Vice President The Rev. Dr. Thomas P. Mulvey, Jr. Hingham, MA J. Michael Utzinger, Hampden-Sydney College Mr. Matthew P. Payne Appleton, WI 2nd Vice President The Rev. Dr. Warren C. Platt New York, NY Robert W. Prichard, Virginia Theological Seminary The Rev. Dr. Robert W. Prichard Alexandria, VA Secretary Pamela Cochran, Loyola University Maryland The Rev. Dr. Gardiner H. Shattuck, Jr. Warwick, RI Treasurer Mrs. Susan L. Stonesifer Silver Spring, MD Bob Panfil, Diocese of Virginia Director of Operations Matthew P. Payne, Diocese of Fond du Lac Patrons ($250-$499) [email protected] Mr. Herschel “Vince” Anderson Tempe, AZ Anglican and Episcopal History The Rev. Cn. Robert G. Carroon, PhD Hartford, CT Dr. Mary S. Donovan Highlands Ranch, CO Editor-in-Chief The Rev. Cn. Nancy R. Holland San Diego, CA Edward L. Bond, Natchez, Mississippi The John F. Woolverton Editor of Anglican and Episcopal History Ms. Edna Johnston Richmond, VA [email protected] The Rev. Stephen A. Little Santa Rosa, CA Church Review Editor Richard Mahfood Bay Harbor, FL J. Barrington Bates, Prof. Frederick V. Mills, Sr. La Grange, GA Diocese of Newark [email protected] The Rev. Robert G. Trache Fort Lauderdale, FL Book Review Editor The Rev. Dr. Brian K. Wilbert Cleveland, OH Sheryl A. Kujawa-Holbrook, Claremont School of Theology [email protected] Anglican and Episcopal History (ISSN 0896-8039) is published quarterly (March, June, September, and Sustaining ($100-$499) December) by the Historical Society of the Episcopal Church, PO Box 1301, Appleton, WI 54912-1301 Christopher H.
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Traditions in Didache
    Synoptic Tradition in the Didache Revisited Dr. Aaron Milavec Center for the Study of Religion and Society University of Victoria Ever since a complete copy of the Didache was first discovered in 1873, widespread efforts have been undertaken to demonstrate that the framers of the Didache depended upon a known Gospel (usually Matthew, Luke, or both) and upon one or more Apostolic Fathers (Barnabas, Hermas, and/or Justin Martyr). In more recent times, however, most scholars have pushed back the date of composition to the late first or early second century and called into question dependency upon these sources. In the late 50s, Audet1. Glover2, and Koester3 cautiously developed this stance independent of each other. More recently, Draper4, Kloppenborg5, Milavec6, Niederwimmer7, Rordorf8, and Van de Sandt9 have argued quite persuasively in favor of this position. Opposition voices, however, are still heard. C.M. Tuckett10 of Oxford University, for example, reexamined all the evidence in 1989 and came to the conclusion that parts of the Didache "presuppose the redactional activity of both evangelists" thereby reasserting an earlier position that "the Didache here presupposes the gospels of Matthew and Luke in their finished forms."11 Clayton N. Jefford, writing in the same year independent of Tuckett, came to the conclusion that the Didache originated in the same community that produced the Gospel of Matthew and that both works had common sources but divergent purposes.12 Vicky Balabanski, in a book-length treatment of the eschatologies of Mark, Matthew, and Didache, reviewed all the evidence up until 1997 and concluded that Did. 16 was written "to clarify and specify certain aspects of Matthew's eschatology."13 This essay will weigh the evidence for and against dependence upon the Gospel of Matthew--the most frequently identified "written source" for the Didache.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commitment to Indigenous Self-Determination in the Anglican Church of Canada, 1967–2020
    The Elusive Goal: The Commitment to Indigenous Self-Determination in the Anglican Church of Canada, 1967–2020 ALAN L. HAYES In1967 the Anglican Church of Canada (ACC) committed itself to support Indigenous peoples whowere callingonthe Cana- dian governmenttorecognize theirright to self-determination, andin1995 it resolved to move to recognizeIndigenous self- determination within thechurch itself. Nevertheless,inthe ACC, as in the countryatlarge, Indigenousself-determination hasremained an elusivegoal. To saysoisnot to deny theprogress that theACC has made in developingIndigenous leadership, governance, ministry, and advocacy. But with afew partial excep- tions, IndigenousAnglicansremain under the oversight of aset- tler-dominated churchwith its Eurocentric constitution, canons, policies, budgets, liturgical norms, assumptions, andadmin- istrativeprocedures.1 Whyhas the goalofIndigenous self- determinationprovensoelusive? Iintend to argue herethat colonialassumptions andstructures haveproven tenacious,and that, although Indigenous self-determination is consistent with historical patternsofChristian mission andorganization, the 1 The terms‘‘settler’’and ‘‘Indigenous’’are both problematic, but the nature of this discussion requires,atleast provisionally,abinaryterminology,and these terms are currently widelyused. The Rev.Canon Dr.AlanL.Hayes is BishopsFrederickand Heber Wilkinson Professor of the historyofChristianity at Wycliffe College and the Toronto SchoolofTheology at theUniversity of Toronto. Anglicanand EpiscopalHistory Volume 89,
    [Show full text]
  • Church of North India Synodical Board of Social Services Employees’ Service Rules
    CHURCH OF NORTH INDIA SYNODICAL BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES EMPLOYEES’ SERVICE RULES CNI -SYNODICAL BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES 16 PANDIT PANT MARG NEW DELHI- 110001 FAX : 91-11-23712126 PHONE: 23718168/23351727 Towards Building Communities of www.cnisbss.org Resistance & Hope CHURCH OF NORTH INDIA SYNODICAL BOARD OF SOCIAL SERVICES EMPLOYEES’ SERVICE RULES I. PREFACE 1. These rules shall be called CNI-SBSS Employee’s Service Rules and shall be applicable to all the employees of the CNI- SBSS. 2. These rules shall supersede all or any previous rules or practices which have been in operation on matters covered by those rules. II. DEFFINITIONS 1. ‘Synodical Board’ means CNI Synodical Board of Social Services and includes all departments, offices, sub-centre, sections, Resource canters and branches where the activities of the Board are carried out. 2. ‘Governing Body’ means the Governing Body of the Synodical Board to whom, by the rules of the said Board, the management of its affairs shall be entrusted. 3. ‘Chief Functionary’ The Chief Coordinator is the Chief Functionary. 4. ‘Premises’ means the entire premises of the CNI-SBSS whether situated inside or outside the main institution premises. 5. ‘Habitual’ means commission or omission of an act for not less than three occasions in a Calendar month. 6. ‘Masculine’ shall include ‘Feminine’ and ‘Singular’ shall imply ‘Plural’ where relevant, and vice versa. 7. ‘Salary’ ’ means and includes all components i.e., in basic and all other allowances admissible while on duty. III. GENERAL 1. Every employee must attend Morning Worship Service at the Office held every day at the stipulated time during all working days.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Annual Convention
    CONVENTION JOURNAL ONE HUNDRED FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL CONVENTION of the EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH SATURDAY, OCTOBER 4th, 2008 ST. MARTIN’S EPISCOPAL CHURCH Monroeville, Pennsylvania SPECIAL CONVENTION of the EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7th, 2008 MARRIOTT HOTEL, CITY CENTER Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania TABLE OF CONTENTS OFFICIAL LISTS Diocesan Personnel.................................................................................................................3 Constitutionally and Canonically Mandated Governance.........................................................4 Churches in Union with the Diocese........................................................................................8 Clergy of the Diocese............................................................................................................16 Letters Dimissory Accepted -January-December 2008 ..........................................................20 Letters Dimissory Issued -January-December 2008 ...............................................................20 Ordinations ...........................................................................................................................21 Milestone Anniversaries for Canonical Clergy ......................................................................23 PRE-CONVENTION MATERIALS AND REPORTS Agenda..................................................................................................................................24 Resolutions Presented Prior to Convention............................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME 1 Main Thesis
    Engaging the Fertile Silence: Towards a Culturally sensitive Model for dealing with the HIV and AIDS Silence. By Benson Okyere-Manu Supervisor: Prof. Steve De Gruchy Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, in the School of Religion and Theology, University of KwaZulu-Natal VOLUME 1 Main Thesis November 2009 Pietermaritzburg DECLARATION I declare that this thesis, unless specifically indicated in the text, is my own original work which has not been submitted in any other University. ________________________ ________________ Benson Okyere-Manu Date University of KwaZulu-Natal 2009 i ABSTRACT This thesis critically examines one of the major hindrances to dealing adequately with the HIV and AIDS problem facing Africa – the issue of silence. The study has examined the hypothesis that there are cultural factors underlying the silence that surrounds the disease, which when investigated and identified, will provide cues for breaking the silence and a way forward for dealing with the HIV and AIDS epidemic. The study utilises the concept of ‘cultural context’ proposed by Hall and ‘dimensions of culture’ postulated by Hofstede, to investigate the cultural reasons behind the HIV and AIDS silence among the Zulu people in and around Pietermaritzburg in the Kwazulu Natal province of South Africa. Testing these theories in the field with participants in a community-based HIV and AIDS Project called the Community Care Project (CCP) the study found that cultural contexts strongly influence silence around HIV and AIDS. In terms of dimensions of culture, the area was found to exhibit high power distance, low uncertainty avoidance, high collectivism and is feminine in nature in terms of assertiveness, but having high gender inequality (high masculinity in terms of gender egalitarianism).
    [Show full text]
  • PARISH ADMINISTRATION ISSUE 1Llving CHURC----- 1-.··,.:, I
    1 , THE PARISH ADMINISTRATION ISSUE 1llVING CHURC----- 1-.··,.:, I, ENDURE ... EXPLORE YOUR BEST ACTIVE LIVING OPTIONS AT WESTMINSTER COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA! 0 iscover active retirement living at its finest. Cf oMEAND STAY Share a healthy lifestyle with wonderful neighbors on THREE DAYS AND TWO any of our ten distinctive sun-splashed campuses - NIGHTS ON US!* each with a strong faith-based heritage. Experience urban excitement, ATTENTION:Episcopalian ministers, missionaries, waterfront elegance, or wooded Christian educators, their spouses or surviving spouses! serenity at a Westminster You may be eligible for significant entrance fee community - and let us assistance through the Honorable Service Grant impress you with our signature Program of our Westminster Retirement Communities LegendaryService TM. Foundation. Call program coordinator, Donna Smaage, today at (800) 948-1881 for details. *Transportation not included. Westminster Communities of Florida www.WestminsterRetirement.com Comefor the Lifestyle.Stay for a Lifetime.T M 80 West Lucerne Circle • Orlando, FL 32801 • 800.948.1881 The objective of THELIVI N G CHURCH magazine is to build up the body of Christ, by describing how God is moving in his Church ; by reporting news of the Church in an unbiased manner; and by presenting diverse points of view. THIS WEEK Features 16 2005 in Review: The Church Begins to Take New Shape 20 Resilient People Coas1:alChurches in Mississippi after Hurricane Katrina BYHEATHER F NEWfON 22 Prepare for the Unexpected Parish sUIVivalcan hinge on proper planning BYHOWARD IDNTERTHUER Opinion 24 Editor's Column Variety and Vitality 25 Editorials The Holy Name 26 Reader's Viewpoint Honor the Body BYJONATHAN B .
    [Show full text]
  • Devotion and Polemic in Eighteenth-Century England: William Mason and the Literature of Lay Evangelical Anglicanism
    Devotion and Polemic in Eighteenth-Century England: William Mason and the Literature of Lay Evangelical Anglicanism Simon Lewis abstract William Mason (1719–1791), an Anglican evangelical lay- man of Bermondsey, London, published extensively on theological issues to educate the Anglican laity in the Church of England’s Reformed tradi- tion. Despite the popularity of his writings, Mason has been neglected by scholars. By providing the first large-scale examination of Mason’s works, Simon Lewis shows that eighteenth-century Calvinist evangelicalism bene- fited from an active and vocal laity, whose evangelistic strategies were not limited to preaching; provides a model for how scholars can integrate piety and polemic in their explorations of religious print culture; and enhances our understanding of the laity’s engagement in theological controversies. Keywords: devotion; polemic; Anglicanism; Methodism; Calvinism Only relatively recently has scholarship of evangelicalism in eighteenth-century England benefited from fresh attention to the laity. In Heart Reli- gion in the British Enlightenment (2008), Phyllis Mack considers the ways in which female Methodist leaders—particularly Mary Bosanquet Fletcher—discerned spiri- tual authority and direction from their dreams.1 Antje Matthews similarly empha- sizes lay experience by exploring the evangelical painter John Russell, who recorded his feelings and anxieties.2 While these studies of lay spirituality have certainly enhanced our understanding of eighteenth-century evangelicalism, their empha- sis on religious experience has meant that the importance of polemic has often been neglected. The question of whether devotional piety took priority over religious 1. Phyllis Mack, Heart Religion in the British Enlightenment: Gender and Emotion in Early Methodism (Cambridge, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • New Religious Movements
    New Religious Movements New Religious Movements: Challenge and response is a searching and wide-ranging collection of essays on the contemporary phenomenon of new religions. The contributors to this volume are all established specialists in the sociology, theology, law, or the history of new minority movements. The primary focus is the response of the basic institutions of society to the challenge which new religious movements represent. The orientation of this volume is to examine the way in which new movements in general have affected modern society in areas such as economic organisation; the operation of the law; the role of the media; the relationship of so-called ‘cult’ membership to mental health; and the part which women have played in leading or supporting new movements. Specific instances of these relationships are illustrated by reference to many of the most prominent new religions – Hare Krishna, The Brahma Kumaris, The Unification Church, The Jesus Army, The Family’, The Church of Scientology, and Wicca. For students of religion or sociology, New Religious Movements is an invaluable source of information, an example of penetrating analysis, and a series of thought-provoking contributions to a debate which affects many areas of contemporary life in many parts of the world. Contributors: Eileen Barker, James Beckford, Anthony Bradney, Colin Campbell, George Chryssides, Peter Clarke, Paul Heelas, Massimo Introvigne, Lawrence Lilliston, Gordon Melton, Elizabeth Puttick, Gary Shepherd, Colin Slee, Frank Usarski, Bryan Wilson. Bryan Wilson is an Emeritus Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford. He is the author and editor of several books on sects and New Religious Movements.
    [Show full text]
  • 180 2018 Spring Northern Lights
    # 180 The Journal of the Anglican Diocese of Yukon Spring 2018 Christ Church Cathedral installs their new Vestry. page 2 Northern Lights Winter 2017 Day 10 and 25 Mayo: St. Mary with St. Mark. Licensed Lay Day 1 & 16 Ministers Charles & Valerie Maier; Pelly Whitehorse: Christ Church Cathedral. Crossing: St. James the Lord’s Brother The Very Rev. Sean Murphy; The Rev. Elsa Cheeseman and Don Cheeseman; Licensed Day 11 & 26 Lay Minister: Beverley Whitehouse, Gaya Dawson City: St. Paul’s. Moosehide: St. Tiedeman and David Robertson. Barnabas; The Klondike Creeks; The Demp- ster Hwy. The Ven. Laurie Munro, Archdeacon Day 2 & 17 of Klondike;The Rev. Percy Henry. Licensed Fort Nelson: St. Mary Magdalene. Toad Lay Ministers: Mabel Henry; Shirley Pennell River, Alaska Highway, Mile 150-506 and Betty Davidson. The Ven. Lesley Wheeler-Dame, Archdeacon of Liard & Eric Dame;The Rev. Glen Gough & Day 12 & 27 Sarah Gough; Licensed Lay Ministers: Jeanie Old Crow: St. Luke’s. Arva, Mark Tudor and Kathleen Olson. The Rev. Bert Chestnut, The Rev. Marion Schafer, Esau Schafer & Lay Ministry Team Day 3 & 18 St. John the Baptist Watson Lake: ; Lower Day 13 & 28 Post, Swift River, Telegraph Creek: St. The Ven. Sarah Usher: Executive Archdeacon; Aidan; Dease Lake; Glenora. Licensed Lay Members of the Diocesan Executive Com- Minister: Tim Liverton mittee; Diocesan Prayer Partner: Diocese of Fredericton. Day 4 & 19 Carcross, Tagish & Johnson’s Crossing Day 14 & 29 St. Saviour’s . Patti Tetlichi, Yukon Apostolate. Bishop’s St. Philips, Ven. Sarah Usher, Len Teslin: School of Yukon Ministries. Usher and the Ministry Team PWRDF Diocesan Representative: Betty Davidson Day 5 & 20: Communities of: Carmacks & Diocesan ACW President, Blanche Buckle, Keno.
    [Show full text]