DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum Vitæ

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum Vitæ CURRICULUM VITAE NAME: KRADIN, Nikolay Nikolaevich DATE AND PLACE OF BIRTH: 17 April 1962, Onokhoy, Republic of Buryatia, Russian Federation ACADEMIC CREDENTIALS: • Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, December 22, 2011 • professor (the Russian equivalent of the Professor of Social Anthropology), February 20, 2001, The Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. • doktor istoricheskih nauk (Dr. Hist. Sc. - the Russian equivalent of the Dr. Habil.), June 25, 1999, Oriental Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences in Sankt-Petersburg. • dozent (the Russian equivalent of the Associate Professor of Political Sciences), Mai 25, 2000, The Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation. • kandidat istoricheskih nauk (Cand. Hist. Sc. - the Russian equivalent of Ph.D.), October 18, 1990, Institute of History, archaeology and ethnography of the Far-Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok. • diplom (the Russian equivalent of MA), June 7, 1985, Department of archaeology and ethnography of the Faculty of the History, Irkutsk State University. CURRENT POSITION, MAILING ADDRESS, E-MAIL, FAX, TELEPHONE: Acting Director Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology, Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 89 Pushkinskaya street, Vladivostok, 690001, RUSSIA Tel.: +7 (423) 222-05-07 Fax: +7 (423) 222-05-07 E-mail: [email protected] PREVIOUS EMPLOYMENT: Institute of History, archaeology and ethnology, Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok - Junior Research Fellow, September 1985 – October 1988 Aspirant (the Russian equivalent of post graduate student), October 1988 - October 1990 Research Fellow, October 1990 - March 1992 Chief of Department of Archaeology, April 1992 - April 1994 Senior Research Fellow, April 1994 - April 2000 Major Research Fellow, April 2000 – July 2004 Head Research Fellow, July 2004 - July 2008 Chief of Center of Political anthropology, July 2008 – December 2017 Acting director of Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, December 2017 - the present 1 + Lecturer. Visiting Professor of the Department of World History of the Ussuriysk State Teacher Institute, October 1994 – August 1996 + Lecturer. Dozent (1996-1997) and Professor (1997-2002) of the Department of Political Sciences, Institute of Political Sciences and Law of the Far-Eastern National Technical University, October 1996 – June 2002 + Lecturer. Chief and Professor of the Department of Social Anthropology, Faculty of Cultural Anthropology of the Far-Eastern National Technical University, September 1999 – August 2011 + Lecturer. Professor of the Department of World History, Institute of History, Philosophy, and Cultural Studies of the Far-Eastern National University, September 2000 – August 2011 + Lecturer. Guest Professor of the Mongolian State University and Institute of the Study of the Nomadic Civilizations of UNESCO in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, April 2004. + Chief of Laboratory of archaeology and anthropology of the Far-Eastern National Technical University, March 2005 – August 2011. + Lecturer. Guest Professor of Pardubice University, Czech Republic, November - December 2008. + Lecturer. Head and Professor of the Department of World History, Archaeology, and Anthropology, Far- Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, September 2011 – June 2016. + Lecturer. Visiting Professor, École pratique des hautes études, (EPHE), Sorbonne, France, Paris, March – April 2016. + Lecturer. Visiting Professor, University of Inner Mongolia, Hohhot 呼和浩特, China, October 2016 – the present RESEARCH INTERESTS: • Nomads of Eurasia • Political Anthropology • Social Archaeology • World-Systems Analysis MAIN FIELD WORK:. Archaeology: South Siberia (1981), Amur river region (1982-1984, 1986-1988, 1994), Maritime region of the Russian Far-East (1989, 1991, 1994-1996, 1998-2000, 2004-2006, 2008-2010), Mongolia (2004-2013, 2015-2018), Trans-Baikal region (2008-2017), Inner Mongolia (2013), Buryatia (2017-2018). Anthropology and Ethnology: South Siberia (1982), Amur River region (1997-1998, 2010), Buryatia (2000-2007), Udighe peoples in Northern Primorye region (1999), Tuva (2002, 2008), Mongolia (2001-2002), North-Eastern China (2011). TEACHING EXPERIENCE: 1994 - 1996: Ussuriysk, Department of World History of the Ussuriysk State Teacher Institute (Course taught: Archaeology, Origins of the state). 1996 – 1999: Vladivostok, Institute of Political Sciences and Law of the Far-Eastern State Technical University (Course taught: History of political and legal thought, Political anthropology). 1999 - 2011: Vladivostok, Department of Social Anthropology, Faculty of Cultural Anthropology of the Far- Eastern National Technical University (Courses taught: Introduction to social anthropology; Social anthropology, History anthropological thought; Political anthropology, Legal anthropology, Economic anthropology, Anthropology of nomadism, Anthropology of archaic societies, Social history of ancient and traditional Orient, Theory of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Urban anthropology) 2000 – 2011: Vladivostok, Department of World History, Institute of History, Philosophy, and Cultural Studies, Far-Eastern National University (Courses taught: History of the Ancient World, History of the 2 Orient in the Middle Age and pre-modern time, Theory and Methodology of the History, World- System approach, Historical anthropology) 2004 - Mongolia, Visiting professor, University of Nomadic Civilizations at the International Institute of Nomadic Civilizations UNESKO, Ulaanbaatar (Course taught: History of Nomadic Civilizations) 2008 - Czech Republic, Visiting Professor, University of Pardubice (Course taught: Political Anthropology) 2011 – 2016: Vladivostok, Department of World History, Archaeology, and Anthropology, School of Humanities, Far-Eastern Federal University (Courses taught: Social anthropology, Theory and Methodology of the History, Archaeology of State Origins, Archaeology of Nomadic Empire; Prehistory). 2016 – 2016: France, Paris, Visiting Professor, École pratique des hautes études, (EPHE) (Course taught: Nomadic Imperialism in Inner Asia, Processes of Steppe Urbanization, and Global Eurasian Interaction) 2016 – present: China, Hohhot, Visiting Professor, Inner Mongolian University, Department of Ethnology and Sociology (Course taught: Nomads of Inner Asia) RESEARCH GRANTS (from 1993 – present: 73 grants) including: 1993-1995: Russian Foundation for the Humanities Research Grant 93-06-10313 "Nomadic Empires: origin, development, decline" 1994-1995: Soros Foundation Moscow Branch Research Grant # Z 16000/542 "The Hsiung-nu Empire" 1997-1998: Moscow Social Scientific Foundation with Ford Foundation Grant # 263 "Modernization and traditional peasant pastoral society of Buryatia" 1997-1999: Russian Foundation for the Humanities Research Grant #97-01-00533 "The modern theories of the origins of the state" 1997-1999: Russian Foundation for the Humanities Research Grant #, № 97-06-96759 'The Asia of Baykal region in the Hsiung-nu period: ecology, settlement pattern, social structure" 1997-1999: The Ministry of Education of Japan Grant "Settlement systems of the traditional peoples of Amur river basin" 1997-2000: The Federal Program center 'Integratsiia' of Russia Federation, Grant # 752 "Man and Nature in Northern Primorye region; from prehistory to modernity" 1998-1999: The Federal Program center 'Integratsiia' of Russia Federation, Grant # 983-06 "Alternative ways to civilization" 1998-1999: Moscow Social Scientific Foundation with Ford Foundation, Grant # 224 "Traditional power in post-Soviet political culture" 1999: Russian Foundation of Basic Research, Grant # 99-06-99512 "The Economy of the Nomadic Empire" 1999-2000: The Federal Program center 'Integratsiia' of Russia Federation, Grant # М422-06 "Political anthropology. Text edition for students". 1999-2001: RSS/OSSF (Open society) Grant # 1266/1999 "Pastoral nomadism in Buryatia: tradition amd modernisation". 2000-2002: Russian Foundation of Basic Research, Grant # 00-06-80395 "Ecological adaptation of the prehistoric and traditional hunter-gathering cultures in the Primorye region of Russia". 2001-present: CNRS, France, "The Societies of the nomads and the State: contemporary analysis of the transitional processes among the Buryats and Kirghiz". 2002-2004: Russian Foundation for the Humanities Research Grant #02-01-0017, "The Empire Liao (907- 1125) and the nations of the Far East of Russia". 2002-2004: Russian Foundation of Basic Research, Grant # 02-06-80359 "Transformation of the pastoralism among the Aginsky Buryats in the post-Soviet period: tradition and modernity". 2002-2004: Russian Foundation of Basic Research, Grant # 02-06-80379 "The Mongols Empire of Chinggis Khan". 2004-2005: INO-Center of Russia with sponsorship of Carnegie and Macarthur foundations, "Ethnic and social structures of nomads of Siberia and Far East in historical retrospective" 2006-2006: Russian Foundation of Basic Research, Grant # 06-06-80234a "Transformation of pastoral peasants of the Siberian peoples in post-Soviet Period: cross-cultural study". 3 2007-2009: Russian Foundation for the Humanities and Mongolian Ministry of Education and Science Grant #№ 07-01-92002а/G "Nomadic Empires of Mongolian Steppes: from Xiongnu to Chinggis Khan Power ". 2010-2012: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, grant-in-Aid Scientific Research, 2010-2012, "Cultural Adaptation to the Natural and Social Environment in the Forest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Siberiaâ•Žs First Nations
    TITLE: SIBERIA'S FIRST NATIONS AUTHOR: GAIL A. FONDAHL, University of Northern British Columbia THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH TITLE VIII PROGRAM 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION:1 CONTRACTOR: Dartmouth College PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: Gail A. Fondahl COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER: 808-28 DATE: March 29, 1995 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded by Council Contract. The Council and the U.S. Government have the right to duplicate written reports and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within the Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials for their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, or make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without the written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act 5 U.S.C. 552, or other applicable law. 1 The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the National Council for Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U. S. Department of State under Title VIII (the Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended). The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author(s). CONTENTS Executive Summary i Siberia's First Nations 1 The Peoples of the
    [Show full text]
  • World Directory of Minorities
    World Directory of Minorities Europe MRG Directory –> Russian Federation –> Buryats Print Page Close Window Buryats Profile According to the 2002 national census, there are 445,175 Buryats in the Russian Federation. Along with the Kalmyks, the Buryats speak a Mongolic language. The Buryats are concentrated in the Buryat Republic (pop. 981,238: Buryats 27.8 per cent, Russians 67.8 per cent, others 4.4 per cent) as well as Irkutsk Oblast, northern Mongolia and north-west China. The Buryat Lamaist church is part of a Buddhist sect which spread from Tibet to Mongolia in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Some Buryats have adopted Eastern Orthodoxy. Historical context Although Russians penetrated the Buryat homelands as early as the seventeenth century, contacts between the two peoples remained limited until large-scale Russian migration in the eighteenth century. A Buryat nationalist movement developed at the turn of the century in response to the growing Russian presence. In 1921, a Buryat-Mongol AO was established in the Far Eastern Republic; in May 1923 a Buryat-Mongol Autonomous Republic was created. In May 1923 they were merged to form the Buryat- Mongol ASSR. In 1937, the Buryat-Mongol ASSR was divided into three units. Territory west of Lake Baikal (12 per cent of the territory) went to Irkutsk Oblast, establishing a Buryat enclave (the Ust-Orda or Ust-Ordynsk AOk); the eastern steppe (12 per cent) was incorporated into Chita Oblast, where another enclave (the Aga Buryat or Aginsk AOk) was created. This division of the Buryat lands caused resentment. In 1958, in an attempt to eliminate any link with Mongolia, the word Mongol was dropped from the region's title leaving the Buryat ASSR.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Scholarship from the Buryat Mongols of Siberia
    ASIANetwork Exchange | fall 2012 | volume 20 |1 Review essay: Recent Scholarship from the Buryat Mongols of Siberia Etnicheskaia istoriia i kul’turno-bytovye traditsii narodov baikal’skogo regiona. [The Ethnic History and the Traditions of Culture and Daily Life of the Peoples of the Baikal Region] Ed. M. N. Baldano, O. V. Buraeva and D. D. Nimaev. Ulan-Ude: Institut mongolovedeniia, buddologii i tibetologii Sibirskogo otdeleniia Rossiiskoi Akademii nauk, 2010. 243 pp. ISBN 978-5-93219-245-0. Keywords Siberia; Buryats; Mongols Siberia’s vast realms have often fallen outside the view of Asian Studies specialists, due perhaps to their centuries-long domination by Russia – a European power – and their lack of elaborately settled civilizations like those elsewhere in the Asian landmass. Yet Siberia has played a crucial role in Asian history. For instance, the Xiongnu, Turkic, and Mongol tribes who frequently warred with China held extensive Southern Siberian territories, and Japanese interventionists targeted Eastern Siberia during the Russian Civil War (1918- 1921). Moreover, far from being a purely ethnic-Russian realm, Siberia possesses dozens of indigenous Asian peoples, some of whom are clearly linked to other, more familiar Asian nations: for instance, the Buryats of Southeastern Siberia’s Lake Baikal region share par- ticularly close historic, ethnic, linguistic, religious, and cultural ties with the Mongols. The Buryats, who fell under Russian rule over the seventeenth century, number over 400,000 and are the largest native Siberian group. Most dwell in the Buryat Republic, or Buryatia, which borders Mongolia to the south and whose capital is Ulan-Ude (called “Verkheneu- dinsk” during the Tsarist period); others inhabit Siberia’s neighboring Irkutsk Oblast and Zabaikal’skii Krai (formerly Chita Oblast), and tens of thousands more live in Mongolia and China.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Pool of Buryats: Clinal Variability and Territorial Subdivision Based on Data of YChromosome Markers V
    ISSN 10227954, Russian Journal of Genetics, 2014, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 180–190. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2014. Original Russian Text © V.N. Kharkov, K.V. Khamina, O.F. Medvedeva, K.V. Simonova, E.R. Eremina, V.A. Stepanov, 2014, published in Genetika, 2014, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 203–213. HUMAN GENETICS Gene Pool of Buryats: Clinal Variability and Territorial Subdivision Based on Data of YChromosome Markers V. N. Kharkova, K. V. Khaminaa, O. F. Medvedevaa, K. V. Simonovaa, E. R. Ereminab, and V. A. Stepanova a Institute of Medical Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, nab. Ushaiki 10, Tomsk, 634050 Russia email: [email protected], vladimir.kharkov@medgenetics b Department of Therapy, Buryat State University, ul. Smolin 24a, UlanUde, 670000 Russia Received April 23, 2013 Abstract—The structure of the Buryat gene pool has been studied based on the composition and frequency of Ychromosome haplogroups in eight geographically distant populations. Eleven haplogroups have been found in the Buryat gene pool, two of which are the most frequent (N1c1 and C3d). The greatest difference in haplogroup frequencies was fixed between western and eastern Buryat samples. The evaluation of genetic diversity based on haplogroup frequencies revealed that it has low values in most of the samples. The evalua tion of the genetic differentiation of the examined samples using an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) shows that the Buryat gene pool is highly differentiated by haplotype frequencies. Phylogenetic analysis within haplogroups N1c1 and C3d revealed a strong founder effect, i.e., reduced diversity and starlike phy logeny of the median network of haplotypes that form specific subclusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Character of Modern Interethnic Relations in Krasnoyarsk Territory As Per Associative Experiment
    Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 11 (2011 4) 1553-1576 ~ ~ ~ УДК 316.622 Specific Character of Modern Interethnic Relations in Krasnoyarsk Territory as Per Associative Experiment Galina V. Kivkutsan* Siberian Federal University 79 Svobodny, Krasnoyarsk, 660041 Russia 1 Received 15.03.2011, received in revised form 17.06.2011, accepted 10.10.2011 Ethnocultural space of Krasnoyarsk territory is an urgent subject for research nowadays. According to the criteria of conflict, ethnology and sociology theory Krasnoyarsk territory has been both a centre of strained interethnic relations and a specific interethnic conglomerate. Thus, the study of ethnicity phenomenon in Krasnoyarsk territory is one of the most important tasks of applied cultural research. The research objectives are to detect an interethnic relations dominant type on the basis of specificity of ethnocultural space of Krasnoyarsk territory (while applying associative experiment method) and to model possible ways of conflict settlement. The research has resulted in the relevant conclusion that interethnic relations in the territory have a set of features peculiar to this territory. That has led to a hypothesis about a possible interethnic conflicts settlement in case of their threat. The research uniqueness is stated through both a particular practical orientation of the research and experimental application of new forms of the developed methods into the sphere of cultural research. A considerable attention has been paid to a complex approach to a definite problem. Associative experiment is considered to be the most effective method of detection and research of such a cultural phenomenon as ethnic stereotype. It is proved by the specificity of the method initially applied in psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Insights Into the Social Organisation of the Avar Period Elite
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/415760; this version posted March 31, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Genetic insights into the social organisation of the Avar period elite 2 in the 7th century AD Carpathian Basin 3 4 Veronika Csáky1*, Dániel Gerber1,2, István Koncz3, Gergely Csiky1, Balázs G. Mende1, 5 Bea Szeifert1,2, Balázs Egyed2, Horolma Pamjav4, Antónia Marcsik5, Erika Molnár5, 6 György Pálfi5, András Gulyás6, Bernadett Kovacsóczy7, Gabriella M. Lezsák8, Gábor 7 Lőrinczy9, Anna Szécsényi-Nagy1,*,#, Tivadar Vida1,3,*,# 8 9 1: Institute of Archaeology, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1097, 10 Budapest, Hungary 11 2: Department of Genetics, ELTE – Eötvös Loránd University, 1117, Budapest, Hungary 12 3: Institute of Archaeological Sciences, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, 1053, Budapest, Hungary 13 4: Department of Reference Samples Analysis, Institute of Forensic Genetics, Hungarian Institute for Forensic 14 Sciences, 1027, Budapest, Hungary 15 5: Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Szeged, 6726, Szeged, Hungary 16 6: Jász Museum, 5100, Jászberény, Hungary 17 7: Katona József Museum, 6000, Kecskemét, Hungary 18 8: Institute of History, Research Centre for the Humanities, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1097, Budapest, 19 Hungary 20 9: Móra Ferenc Museum, 6720, Szeged, Hungary 21 22 *Corresponding authors: [email protected], [email protected], 23 [email protected] 24 #These authors jointly supervised this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Insights Into the Social Organisation of the Avar Period Elite
    www.nature.com/scientificreports There are amendments to this paper OPEN Genetic insights into the social organisation of the Avar period elite in the 7th century AD Carpathian Basin Veronika Csáky1*, Dániel Gerber1,2, István Koncz3, Gergely Csiky1, Balázs G. Mende1, Bea Szeifert1,2, Balázs Egyed2, Horolma Pamjav4, Antónia Marcsik5, Erika Molnár5, György Pálf5, András Gulyás6, Bernadett Kovacsóczy7, Gabriella M. Lezsák8, Gábor Lőrinczy9, Anna Szécsényi-Nagy 1,10* & Tivadar Vida1,3,10* After 568 AD the Avars settled in the Carpathian Basin and founded the Avar Qaganate that was an important power in Central Europe until the 9th century. Part of the Avar society was probably of Asian origin; however, the localisation of their homeland is hampered by the scarcity of historical and archaeological data. Here, we study mitogenome and Y chromosomal variability of twenty-six individuals, a number of them representing a well-characterised elite group buried at the centre of the Carpathian Basin more than a century after the Avar conquest. The studied group has maternal and paternal genetic afnities to several ancient and modern East-Central Asian populations. The majority of the mitochondrial DNA variability represents Asian haplogroups (C, D, F, M, R, Y and Z). The Y-STR variability of the analysed elite males belongs only to fve lineages, three N-Tat with mostly Asian parallels and two Q haplotypes. The homogeneity of the Y chromosomes reveals paternal kinship as a cohesive force in the organisation of the Avar elite strata on both social and territorial level. Our results indicate that the Avar elite arrived in the Carpathian Basin as a group of families, and remained mostly endogamous for several generations after the conquest.
    [Show full text]
  • Y-Chromosome Diversity in the Kalmyks at the Ethnical and Tribal Levels
    Journal of Human Genetics (2013) 58, 804–811 & 2013 The Japan Society of Human Genetics All rights reserved 1434-5161/13 www.nature.com/jhg ORIGINAL ARTICLE Y-chromosome diversity in the Kalmyks at the ethnical and tribal levels Boris Malyarchuk1, Miroslava Derenko1, Galina Denisova1, Sanj Khoyt2, Marcin Woz´niak3, Tomasz Grzybowski3 and Ilya Zakharov4 The Mongolic-speaking Kalmyks currently inhabiting the steppes of the Volga region have Central Asian ancestry and are organized into the tribal groups. The genetic relationships among these tribes and their origin have remained obscure. We analyzed 17 short tandem repeat and 44 binary polymorphisms of Y-chromosome in 426 individuals mainly from three major tribes of the Kalmyks (the Torguuds, Do¨rwo¨ds and Khoshuuds). Among these tribes, the Do¨rwo¨ds and Torguuds, as well as the Kalmyks collectively as an ethnic group, showed relatively close genetic affinities to each other and to the Mongols and Altaian Kazakhs, whereas the Khoshuuds were clearly separated from all of them, gathering with the Manchu, Tibetans or Evenks (depending on the algorithm used to calculate genetic distances). The genetic results also indicate that paternal gene flow from East Europeans to the Kalmyks is very little, despite their cohabitation in the North Caspian Steppe during the last 380 years. The occurrence of unique cluster of N1c-Tat haplotypes in the Khoshuuds, which dates to about 340 years and is likely to have East European ancestry, is considered as a result of interethnic contacts occurred soon after the appearance of the Kalmyk tribes in the Volga-Ural region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Neighbouring Making Relations Across China’S Borders the Art of Neighbouring Asian Borderlands
    2 ASIAN BORDERLANDS Zhang (eds) Zhang The Art Neighbouring of The Edited by Martin Saxer and Juan Zhang The Art of Neighbouring Making Relations Across China’s Borders The Art of Neighbouring Asian Borderlands Asian Borderlands presents the latest research on borderlands in Asia as well as on the borderlands of Asia – the regions linking Asia with Africa, Europe and Oceania. Its approach is broad: it covers the entire range of the social sciences and humanities. The series explores the social, cultural, geographic, economic and historical dimensions of border-making by states, local communities and flows of goods, people and ideas. It considers territorial borderlands at various scales (national as well as supra- and sub-national) and in various forms (land borders, maritime borders), but also presents research on social borderlands resulting from border-making that may not be territorially fixed, for example linguistic or diasporic communities. Series Editors Tina Harris, University of Amsterdam Willem van Schendel, University of Amsterdam Editorial Board Members Franck Billé, University of Cambridge Duncan McDuie-Ra, University of New South Wales Eric Tagliacozzo, Cornell University Yuk Wah Chan, City University Hong Kong The Art of Neighbouring Making Relations Across China’s Borders Edited by Martin Saxer and Juan Zhang Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Trucks waiting in front of the Kyrgyz border at Torugart Pass. Photo: Martin Saxer, 2014 Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 258 1 e-isbn 978 90 4853 262 9 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789462982581 nur 740 Creative Commons License CC BY (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) Martin Saxer & Juan Zhang / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2017 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperial Formations and Ethnic Diversity: Institutions, Practices, and Longue Durée Illustrated by the Example of Russia
    MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY WORKING PAPERS WORKING PAPER NO. 165 DITTMAR SCHORKOWITZ IMPERIAL FORMATIONS AND ETHNIC DIVERSITY: INSTITUTIONS, PRACTICES, AND LONGUE DURÉE ILLUSTRATED BY THE EXAMPLE OF RUSSIA Halle / Saale 2015 ISSN 1615-4568 Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, PO Box 110351, 06017 Halle / Saale, Phone: +49 (0)345 2927- 0, Fax: +49 (0)345 2927- 402, http://www.eth.mpg.de, e-mail: [email protected] Imperial Formations and Ethnic Diversity: institutions, practices, and longue durée illustrated by the example of Russia1 Dittmar Schorkowitz2 Abstract In the present essay I will examine the complex relations between imperial formations and ethnic diversity, illustrated by the example of Russia. The focus will be on state institutions and practices of rule of longue durée that may be typical of the tension-laden relationship between ethnic minorities and multinational states, and thus of immediate relevance for the present as well. The essay begins with a brief review of recent debates on the imperial turn and Russia’s ‘postcolonial’ heritage. Then the “particularistic arrangements of rule” identified by Adeeb Khalid with regard to Soviet Central Asia will be discussed in some detail, using the example of the eastern Siberian Buryats and the Kalmyks of southern Russia. It will become apparent that the imperial formation of institutions is characterised by historical continuity. In the concluding remarks, I will suggest some new perspectives with regard to a more comprehensive and comparative approach. 1 The present working paper is the English translation of a revised, updated, and enlarged version of a public lecture held before the Faculty for Philosophy of the Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg on 17 December 2014, entitled: “Imperiale Formationen und ethnische Diversität: Institutionen, Praktiken und Longue Durée am Beispiel Rußlands”.
    [Show full text]
  • In Russian Ranks, Discontent Over Ukraine by MARIA TSVETKOVA
    RUSSIA HEROES PAST: President Vladimir Putin lays flowers during a 2014 ceremony to commemorate the anniversary of the beginning of what Russians call the Great Patriotic War against Nazi Germany. Putin has repeatedly said that there are no Russian soldiers in Ukraine. REUTERS/Maxim Zmeyev Some soldiers say they have quit the army because of the war in Ukraine – even though Russia says it has no troops there. In Russian ranks, discontent over Ukraine BY MARIA TSVETKOVA SPECIAL REPORT 1 RUSSIA DISCONTENT IN THE RANKS MOSCOW/DONETSK, MAY 10, 2015 ome Russian soldiers are quitting the army because of the conflict in SUkraine, several soldiers and human rights activists have told Reuters. Their ac- counts call into question the Kremlin’s con- tinued assertions that no Russian soldiers have been sent to Ukraine, and that any Russians fighting alongside rebels there are volunteers. Evidence for Russians fighting in Ukraine – Russian army equipment found in the country, testimony from soldiers’ families and from Ukrainians who say they were captured by Russian paratroopers – is abundant. Associates of Boris Nemtsov, a prominent Kremlin critic killed in February, will soon publish a report which they say AMMUNITION: Spent cartridges at Donetsk airport. Two soldiers told Reuters they quit rather than will contain new evidence of the Russian risk being sent to Ukraine. REUTERS/BAZ RATNER military presence in Ukraine. Until now, however, it has been ex- tremely rare to find Russian soldiers who If our troops were officially He said he had been sent to fight in have fought there and are willing to talk.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Anthropological Study of Altaian Histories Utilizing Population Genetics and Phylogeography
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations Spring 2011 A Molecular Anthropological Study of Altaian Histories Utilizing Population Genetics and Phylogeography Matthew Dulik University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Biological and Physical Anthropology Commons, Genetics Commons, and the Molecular Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Dulik, Matthew, "A Molecular Anthropological Study of Altaian Histories Utilizing Population Genetics and Phylogeography" (2011). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1545. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1545 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1545 For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Molecular Anthropological Study of Altaian Histories Utilizing Population Genetics and Phylogeography Abstract This dissertation explores the genetic histories of several populations living in the Altai Republic of Russia. It employs an approach combining methods from population genetics and phylogeography to characterize genetic diversity in these populations, and places the results in a molecular anthropological context. Previously, researchers used anthropological, historical, ethnographic and linguistic evidence to categorize the indigenous inhabitants of the Altai into two groups – northern and southern Altaians. Genetic data obtained in this study were
    [Show full text]