Importance of Multi-Dimensional Analyses of Resource Partitioning in Highly Mobile Species Assemblages

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Importance of Multi-Dimensional Analyses of Resource Partitioning in Highly Mobile Species Assemblages Popul Ecol (2015) 57:601–611 DOI 10.1007/s10144-015-0508-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Importance of multi-dimensional analyses of resource partitioning in highly mobile species assemblages 1 1 1 Anna Roswag • Nina Inga Becker • Jorge Andre´ Encarnac¸a˜o Received: 9 December 2014 / Accepted: 25 August 2015 / Published online: 8 September 2015 Ó The Society of Population Ecology and Springer Japan 2015 Abstract Resource partitioning is an essential mecha- assessment of dietary and spatial resource partitioning in nism enabling species coexistence. The resources that are bats. used by an animal are linked to its morphology and ecol- ogy. Therefore, similar species should use similar resour- Keywords Bats Á d13C Á d15N Á Molecular diet analysis Á ces. The ecological niche of an individual summarizes all Radio telemetry used resources and is therefore composed of several dimensions. Many methods are established to study dif- ferent dimensions of an animal’s niche. The aim of this Introduction study was to demonstrate that a combination of suitable methods is needed to study spatial and dietary resource Approximately 8.7 million species coexist worldwide partitioning of sympatric species in detail. We hypothe- (Mora et al. 2011), many of them living in sympatry and sized that, while each individual method might identify sharing resources. Resource partitioning (differing resource differences between species, the combined results of sev- use of sympatric species) is a mechanism that enables the eral methods will lead to a more complete picture of spatial coexistence of species (Schoener 1974). For every species, and dietary resource partitioning. As model organisms we the ecological niche summarizes its living requirements chose the sympatric insectivorous bat species Myotis with regard to resources like habitat, diet, or environmental bechsteinii, M. nattereri, and P. auritus. We examined parameters (Townsend et al. 2008). The multi-dimensional horizontal habitat use by telemetry, vertical habitat use by nature of the ecological niche means that resource parti- measuring d13C, trophic position by measuring d15Nin tioning occurs in several dimensions (Schoener 1974). The wing membrane, and diet composition by molecular fecal most common combination of multi-dimensional resource analysis. Our results show that each method is able to partitioning is diet and habitat as suggested by Schoener provide information about spatial/dietary resource parti- (1974). Spatial segregation of species may result in the use tioning. However, considering further dimensions by of distinct foraging habitats (Pita et al. 2010) or in foraging combining several methods allows a more comprehensive at different heights (Vieira and Monteiro-Filho 2003; Voigt 2010). Dietary resource partitioning includes diet compo- sition but also trophic position within a food web (Siemers et al. 2011; Shiels et al. 2013). Spatial and dietary Electronic supplementary material The online version of this dimensions are not independent of each other as the article (doi:10.1007/s10144-015-0508-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. availability of food resources depends on habitat charac- teristics (Townsend et al. 2008). Several methods are & Anna Roswag suitable to study spatial and dietary resource partitioning of [email protected] species. A direct method to study the habitat use of animals is radio-telemetry (Reynolds 2004; Jhala et al. 2009; Ovi- 1 Mammalian Ecology Group, Department of Animal Ecology and Systematics, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, dio et al. 2009; Wikelski et al. 2010). This method has the Giessen, Germany advantage that individual habitat use can be determined in 123 602 Popul Ecol (2015) 57:601–611 detail (Millspaugh et al. 2012). When applying conven- occur sympatrically (e.g., Arlettaz et al. 1997; Hillen and tional radio-telemetry, only one-dimensional habitat use Veith 2013) and, being the only actively flying mammals, can be described (Brown et al. 2009). Thus, vertical seg- occupy the three-dimensional space (Norberg and Rayner regation cannot be determined, although this factor may be 1987). Nursery colonies of European bat species are highly important for species that are able to use different heights philopatric and usually occupy the same habitats through- or depths (Wilson 2010). Overall habitat use can also be out an individual’s life (e.g., Entwistle et al. 2000; Rivers estimated indirectly by analyzing stable isotope ratios, the et al. 2006). European bats are almost exclusively insec- ratio of the heavy to the light isotope of an element (dX, tivorous (Dietz et al. 2009) feeding on several arthropod where X is the heavy isotope of the respective element). orders (Vaughan 1997). Therefore, every bat species Different isotopes may be used to test different assump- should occupy its own niche that at least slightly differs in tions. For example on a large geographical scale, hydrogen the dietary and/or spatial dimensions from that of other isotope ratios (d2H) provide insights into animal migration species. because d2H is correlated to latitude (Hobson 1999). Car- We chose the European forest-dwelling bats Myotis bon isotope ratios (d13C) are suitable to estimate foraging bechsteinii (Kuhl), Myotis nattereri (Kuhl), and Plecotus grounds (Sullivan et al. 2006) or foraging height (Voigt auritus (Linnaeus) that are very similar in their morphol- 13 2010) of animals. d C differs between C3/C4 plants and ogy and ecology (Dietz et al. 2009; Becker et al. 2013). marine/terrestrial systems (i.e., foraging grounds) and it Their nursery colonies can coexist on a very small spatial was shown for tropical forests that leaves’ d13C is corre- scale (Otto et al. 2013). All three species forage mainly lated to vegetation height (DeNiro and Epstein 1976; within deciduous forest (Entwistle et al. 1996; Kerth et al. Medina and Minchin 1980). Nitrogen stable isotopes ratios 2001; Smith and Racey 2008) and have relatively short and (d15N), are suitable to indirectly study the diet of species, broad wings with a low aspect ratio and wing loading because 15N accumulates in a characteristic way within a (Norberg and Rayner 1987). This leads to a high maneu- food web and therefore, provides information about the verability and enables them to forage within highly clut- trophic level of individuals (DeNiro and Epstein 1981). A tered space (Aldridge and Rautenbach 1987). In addition to single sample can simultaneously provide information on catching prey in flight, the three species forage by gleaning several dimensions e.g., on habitat use (d13C) and diet i.e., they collect their prey from vegetation surfaces (d15N). By choosing different tissues for analysis of stable (Neuweiler 1989; Siemers and Swift 2006). Species- isotope ratios, short (e.g., liver), intermediate (e.g., mus- specific differences in digestive efficiency (Becker et al. cle), or long (hair) time periods can be studied (MacAvoy 2012), retention times (Roswag et al. 2012), energetics et al. 2006). Stable isotope ratios in tissues always reflect a (Becker et al. 2013), and thermoregulation (Otto et al. mixed signal of all used resources (Hobson 1999) and thus 2013) are strong indicators for resource partitioning. do not allow detailed conclusions regarding individual prey This study assessed if it is possible to determine species. Morphological or molecular fecal analyses are resource partitioning in highly similar species by combin- suitable tools for studying an animal’s diet in more detail. ing stable isotope analysis, telemetry, and molecular Both techniques provide individual short-term information methods. We hypothesize that while each method might be about ingested prey items. Morphological fecal analysis able to detect differences between similar species, the can determine prey organisms only to the order or family combination of different methods will lead to a more level. While rare or highly digestible prey is often under- comprehensive picture of resource partitioning. represented, volume and proportion of the diet can be examined accurately (Whitaker et al. 2009). Molecular fecal analysis has the advantage of being able to detect Methods even rare prey organisms at the species-level (Casper et al. 2007; Razgour et al. 2011). However, no information about Study area and data collection the volume of consumed prey items is provided by this method. By a combination of several methods, strengths of The study was conducted in a small-sized (60 ha) decidu- one method can compensate the weakness of another. ous forest in Central Germany (50°270N, 8°490E). This Combining molecular fecal analysis with measurement of forest is very homogenous in its characteristics, e.g., tree d15N will, for example, provide information on prey age and species composition, and consists mainly of oak spectrum at high resolution and on the importance of dif- and beech trees. It is surrounded by orchards, agricultural ferent prey items independent of their digestibility. land, and further deciduous forests. To reduce data varia- A prerequisite for the study of resource partitioning is a tion as a result of seasonally changing environmental and stable assemblage of coexisting species. Bats (Chiroptera) physiological conditions data acquisition was limited to are suitable model organisms since several species can early pregnancy season (approximately two weeks at the 123 Popul Ecol (2015) 57:601–611 603 beginning of May). This reproduction period proceeds increase of the
Recommended publications
  • Dipterists Digest
    Dipterists Digest 2019 Vol. 26 No. 1 Cover illustration: Eliozeta pellucens (Fallén, 1820), male (Tachinidae) . PORTUGAL: Póvoa Dão, Silgueiros, Viseu, N 40º 32' 59.81" / W 7º 56' 39.00", 10 June 2011, leg. Jorge Almeida (photo by Chris Raper). The first British record of this species is reported in the article by Ivan Perry (pp. 61-62). Dipterists Digest Vol. 26 No. 1 Second Series 2019 th Published 28 June 2019 Published by ISSN 0953-7260 Dipterists Digest Editor Peter J. Chandler, 606B Berryfield Lane, Melksham, Wilts SN12 6EL (E-mail: [email protected]) Editorial Panel Graham Rotheray Keith Snow Alan Stubbs Derek Whiteley Phil Withers Dipterists Digest is the journal of the Dipterists Forum . It is intended for amateur, semi- professional and professional field dipterists with interests in British and European flies. All notes and papers submitted to Dipterists Digest are refereed. Articles and notes for publication should be sent to the Editor at the above address, and should be submitted with a current postal and/or e-mail address, which the author agrees will be published with their paper. Articles must not have been accepted for publication elsewhere and should be written in clear and concise English. Contributions should be supplied either as E-mail attachments or on CD in Word or compatible formats. The scope of Dipterists Digest is: - the behaviour, ecology and natural history of flies; - new and improved techniques (e.g. collecting, rearing etc.); - the conservation of flies; - reports from the Diptera Recording Schemes, including maps; - records and assessments of rare or scarce species and those new to regions, countries etc.; - local faunal accounts and field meeting results, especially if accompanied by ecological or natural history interpretation; - descriptions of species new to science; - notes on identification and deletions or amendments to standard key works and checklists.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterists Forum
    BULLETIN OF THE Dipterists Forum Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 Affiliated to the British Entomological and Natural History Society Bulletin No. 76 Autumn 2013 ISSN 1358-5029 Editorial panel Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Assistant Editor Judy Webb Dipterists Forum Officers Chairman Martin Drake Vice Chairman Stuart Ball Secretary John Kramer Meetings Treasurer Howard Bentley Please use the Booking Form included in this Bulletin or downloaded from our Membership Sec. John Showers website Field Meetings Sec. Roger Morris Field Meetings Indoor Meetings Sec. Duncan Sivell Roger Morris 7 Vine Street, Stamford, Lincolnshire PE9 1QE Publicity Officer Erica McAlister [email protected] Conservation Officer Rob Wolton Workshops & Indoor Meetings Organiser Duncan Sivell Ordinary Members Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD [email protected] Chris Spilling, Malcolm Smart, Mick Parker Nathan Medd, John Ismay, vacancy Bulletin contributions Unelected Members Please refer to guide notes in this Bulletin for details of how to contribute and send your material to both of the following: Dipterists Digest Editor Peter Chandler Dipterists Bulletin Editor Darwyn Sumner Secretary 122, Link Road, Anstey, Charnwood, Leicestershire LE7 7BX. John Kramer Tel. 0116 212 5075 31 Ash Tree Road, Oadby, Leicester, Leicestershire, LE2 5TE. [email protected] [email protected] Assistant Editor Treasurer Judy Webb Howard Bentley 2 Dorchester Court, Blenheim Road, Kidlington, Oxon. OX5 2JT. 37, Biddenden Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, Kent. ME15 8JP Tel. 01865 377487 Tel. 01622 739452 [email protected] [email protected] Conservation Dipterists Digest contributions Robert Wolton Locks Park Farm, Hatherleigh, Oakhampton, Devon EX20 3LZ Dipterists Digest Editor Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
    Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong
    [Show full text]
  • University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    Bucking the trend The diversity of Anthropocene 'winners' among British moths Boyes, Douglas H.; Fox, Richard; Shortall, Chris R.; Whittaker, Robert J. Published in: Frontiers of Biogeography DOI: 10.21425/F5FBG43862 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Boyes, D. H., Fox, R., Shortall, C. R., & Whittaker, R. J. (2019). Bucking the trend: The diversity of Anthropocene 'winners' among British moths. Frontiers of Biogeography, 11(3), 1-15. [3862]. https://doi.org/10.21425/F5FBG43862 Download date: 28. sep.. 2021 UC Merced Frontiers of Biogeography Title Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v Journal Frontiers of Biogeography, 11(3) Authors Boyes, Douglas H. Fox, Richard Shortall, Chris R. et al. Publication Date 2019 DOI 10.21425/F5FBG43862 Supplemental Material https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hz0x33v#supplemental License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California a Frontiers of Biogeography 2019, 11.3, e43862 Frontiers of Biogeography RESEARCH ARTICLE the scientific journal of the International Biogeography Society Bucking the trend: the diversity of Anthropocene ‘winners’ among British moths Douglas H. Boyes1,*, Richard Fox2, Chris R. Shortall3 and Robert J. Whittaker1,4 1 School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK; 2 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Dorset, BH20 5QP, UK; 3 Rothamsted Insect Survey, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, UK and 4 Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaise-Hyönteispyynti Lapin Suojelualueilla 2012–2014
    Jukka Salmela, Stefan Siivonen, Patrycja Dominiak, Antti Haarto, Kai Heller, Juhani Kanervo, Petri Martikainen, Matti Mäkilä, Lauri Paasivirta, Aki Rinne, Juha Salokannel, Guy Söderman ja Pekka Vilkamaa Malaise-hyönteispyynti Lapin suojelualueilla 2012–2014 Metsähallituksen luonnonsuojelujulkaisuja. Sarja A 221 Jukka Salmela, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, jukka.salmela(at)metsa.fi Stefan Siivonen, Metsähallitus, Lapin luontopalvelut, stefan.siivonen(at)metsa.fi Patrycja Dominiak, Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Parasitology, University of Gdansk, heliocopris(at)gmail.com Antti Haarto, Mietoinen, ahaarto(at)gmail.com Kai Heller, Quickborn, kaiheller(at)gmx.de Juhani Kanervo, Turku, jussi.kanervo(at)luukku.com Petri Martikainen, Juva, petri.martikainen(at)uef.fi Matti Mäkilä, Rovaniemi, makila.entomology(at)gmail.com Lauri Paasivirta, Salo, lauri.paasivirta(at)suomi24.fi Aki Rinne, Helsinki, aki.rinne(at)pintakasittelytekniikka.fi Juha Salokannel, Tampere, juha.salokannel(at)gmail.com Guy Söderman, Helsinki, guy.soderman(at)pp.inet.fi Pekka Vilkamaa, Luonnontieteellinen keskusmuseo, Helsingin yliopisto, pekka.vilkamaa(at)helsinki.fi Kansikuva: Malaise-pyydys Pallas–Yllästunturin kansallispuiston Röyninkurussa 2013. Lähteisten latvapurojen varret, varsinkin sellaiset joita ympäröi luonnontilainen havu- metsä, ovat monimuotoisia elinympäristöjä. Tältä paikalta havaittiin mm. Euroopalle uusi sienissääskilaji Mycetophila monstera, erittäin harvinainen pikkuvaaksiainen ou- taruskokirsikäs (Limonia messaurea) ja pohjoinen surviaissääski
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuid Moth (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) Communities in Urban Parks of Warsaw
    POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES • INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY MEMORABILIA ZOOLOGICA MEMORABILIA ZOOL. 42 125-148 1986 GRAŻYNA WINIARSKA NOCTUID MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUIDAE) COMMUNITIES IN URBAN PARKS OF WARSAW ABSTRACT A total of 40 noctuid moth species were recorded in four parks of Warsaw. Respective moth communities consisted of a similar number of species (17—25), but differed in their abundance index (3.5 —7.9). In all the parks, the dominant species were Autographa gamma and Discrestra trifolii. The subdominant species were represented by Acronicta psi, Trachea atriplicis, Mamestra suasa, Mythimna pallens, and Catocala nupta. There were differences in the species composition and dominance structure among noctuid moth communities in urban parks, suburban linden- oak-hornbeam forest, and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forest. In the suburban and natural linden-oak-hornbeam forests, the number of species was higher by 40% and their abundance wao 5 — 9 times higher than in the urban parks. The species predominating in parks occurred in very low numbers in suburban and natural habitats. Only T. atriplicis belonged to the group of most abundant species in all the habitats under study. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the interest of ecologists in urban habitats has been increasing as they proved to be rich in plant and animal species. The vegetation of urban green areas is sufficiently well known since its species composition and spatial structure are shaped by gardening treatment. But the fauna of these areas is poorly known, and regular zoological investigations in urban green areas were started not so long ago, when urban green was recognized as one of the most important factors of the urban “natural” habitat (Ciborowski 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheshire Wildlife Trust
    Cheshire Wildlife Trust Heteroptera and Diptera surveys on the Manchester Mosses with PANTHEON analysis by Phil Brighton 32, Wadeson Way, Croft, Warrington WA3 7JS [email protected] on behalf of Lancashire and Cheshire Wildlife Trusts Version 1.0 September 2018 Lancashire Wildlife Trust Page 1 of 35 Abstract This report describes the results of a series of surveys on the Manchester mosslands covering heteroptera (shield bugs, plant bugs and allies), craneflies, hoverflies, and a number of other fly families. Sites covered are the Holcroft Moss reserve of Cheshire Wildlife Trust and the Astley, Cadishead and Little Woolden Moss reserves of Lancashire Wildlife Trust. A full list is given of the 615 species recorded and their distribution across the four sites. This species list is interpreted in terms of feeding guilds and habitat assemblages using the PANTHEON software developed by Natural England. This shows a strong representation in the sample of species associated with shaded woodland floor and tall sward and scrub. The national assemblage of peatland species is somewhat less well represented, but includes a higher proportion of rare or scarce species. A comparison is also made with PANTHEON results for similar surveys across a similar range of habitats in the Delamere Forest. This suggests that the invertebrate diversity value of the Manchester Mosses is rather less, perhaps as a result of their fragmented geography and proximity to past and present sources of transport and industrial pollution. Introduction The Manchester Mosses comprise several areas of lowland bog or mire embedded in the flat countryside between Warrington and Manchester. They include several areas designated as SSSIs in view of the highly distinctive and nationally important habitat, such as Risley Moss, Holcroft Moss, Bedford Moss, and Astley Moss.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of the Moth Fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a Wetland Forest: a Case Study from Motovun Forest, Istria, Croatia
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM UDC 57:61 VOL. 117, No 3, 399–414, 2015 CODEN PDBIAD DOI: 10.18054/pb.2015.117.3.2945 ISSN 0031-5362 original research article Diversity of the moth fauna (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of a wetland forest: A case study from Motovun forest, Istria, Croatia Abstract TONI KOREN1 KAJA VUKOTIĆ2 Background and Purpose: The Motovun forest located in the Mirna MITJA ČRNE3 river valley, central Istria, Croatia is one of the last lowland floodplain 1 Croatian Herpetological Society – Hyla, forests remaining in the Mediterranean area. Lipovac I. n. 7, 10000 Zagreb Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2014 lepidopterological 2 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, research was carried out on 14 sampling sites in the area of Motovun forest. Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia The moth fauna was surveyed using standard light traps tents. 3 Biodiva – Conservation Biologist Society, Results and Conclusions: Altogether 403 moth species were recorded Kettejeva 1, 6000 Koper, Slovenia in the area, of which 65 can be considered at least partially hygrophilous. These results list the Motovun forest as one of the best surveyed regions in Correspondence: Toni Koren Croatia in respect of the moth fauna. The current study is the first of its kind [email protected] for the area and an important contribution to the knowledge of moth fauna of the Istria region, and also for Croatia in general. Key words: floodplain forest, wetland moth species INTRODUCTION uring the past 150 years, over 300 papers concerning the moths Dand butterflies of Croatia have been published (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Scotland's Soil
    The State of Scotland’s Soil Ed(s) Dobbie, K.E., Bruneau, P.M.C., Towers, W. 22 March 2011 This report should be cited as: Dobbie, K.E., Bruneau, P.M.C and Towers, W. (eds) 2011. The State of Scotland’s Soil. Natural Scotland, www.sepa.org.uk/land/land_publications.aspx Contributors: Chapter 1 Editorial Group Chapter 2 Editorial Group Chapter 3 R.M. Rees (6), H. Black (5), S.J. Chapman (5), H. Clayden (3), A.C. Edwards (5), S. Waldron (12) Chapter 4 W. Towers (5), P. Lewis (10), J. Mackay (8) Chapter 5 A. Cundill (8), J. Bacon (5), P. Dale (8), F.M. Fordyce (1), D. Fowler (2), A. Hedmark (8), A. Hern (8), U. Skiba (2) Chapter 6 C. Erber (8), H. Black (5), P.M.C. Bruneau (10) Chapter 7 A. Lilly (5), C.A. Auton (1), N.J. Baggaley (5), J.P. Bowes (8), C. Foster (1), M. Haq (8), H.J. Reeves (1) Chapter 8 P. D. Hallett (7), B.C. Ball (6) Chapter 9 I. Oliver (8), A. Cross (11), A. Searl (4), S. Shackley (11), C. Smith (10), S. Sohi (11) Chapter 10 P. Griffiths(8) , Editorial Group Chapter 11 M. Aitken (8), Editorial Group In addition, Jean Le Roux (8) contributed to the socio-economic sections in each chapter. Editorial Group K.E. Dobbie (8), P.M.C. Bruneau (10), W. Towers (5) Management Group M. Aitken (8), F. Brewis (9), C. Campbell (5), K.E. Dobbie (8), D. Crothers (8), M. Marsden (8), J.A. Shepherd (8) (1) British Geological Survey (BGS) (2) Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) (3) Forestry Commission Scotland (FCS) (4) Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) (5) Macaulay Land Use Research Institute (MLURI) (6) Scottish Agricultural College (SAC) (7) Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI) (8) Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) (9) Scottish Government (SG) (10) Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) (11) UK Biochar Research Centre (UKBRC) (12) University of Glasgow, Department of Geographical and Earth Sciences Acknowledgements The preparation of this report was supported by a Soil Report Working Group consisting of representatives from BGS, CEH, FCS, Historic Scotland (HS), MLURI, SAC, SCRI, SEPA, SG and SNH.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENT Der Limoniidae, Tipulidae Und Zu Faunistisch-Ökologische Cylindrotomidae (Diptera) Im Bereich Mitteilungen Eines Norddeutschen Tieflandbaches
    ©Faunistisch-Ökologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft e.V. (FÖAG);download www.zobodat.at Zur Habitatpräferenz und Phänologie SUPPLEMENT der Limoniidae, Tipulidae und zu Faunistisch-Ökologische Cylindrotomidae (Diptera) im Bereich Mitteilungen eines norddeutschen Tieflandbaches Faunistisch-Ökologische Mitteilungen Supplement 11 Herausgegeben im Aufträge der Faunistisch-Ökologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft von B. Heydemann, W. Hofmann und U. Irmler Zoologisches Institut und Museum der Universität Kiel Kiel, Dezember 1991 Karl Wachholtz Verlag, Neumünster ©Faunistisch-Ökologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft e.V. (FÖAG);download www.zobodat.at ©Faunistisch-Ökologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft e.V. (FÖAG);download www.zobodat.at Faun.-Ökol. Mitt. Suppl. 1 1 , 1—156 Kiel, Dezember 1991 Zur Habitatpräferenz und Phänologie der Limoniidae, Tipulidae und Cylindrotomidae (Diptera) im Bereich eines norddeutschen Tieflandbaches von Rainer Brinkmann Kiel 1991 Nicht das Wesen einer einzigen Mücke hat das Denken des Menschen zu erspüren vermocht. Thomas von Aquin ©Faunistisch-Ökologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft e.V. (FÖAG);download www.zobodat.at Titelbild: Epiphragma ocellare 2. Körperlänge 12 mm. Herausgegeben im Aufträge der Faunistisch-ökologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft von B. Heydemann, W. Hofmann und U. Irmler Zoologisches Institut und Museum der Universität Kiel Karl Wachholtz Verlag, Neumünster, 1991 This publication is included in the abstracting and indexing coverage of the Bio Sciences Service of Biological Abstracts. ISSN 0430-1285 ©Faunistisch-Ökologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, Microsites and Traits of Noctuidae and Butterflies
    Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Irish Wildlife Manuals No. 35 Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies Ken G.M. Bond and Tom Gittings Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science University College Cork Citation: Bond, K.G.M. and Gittings, T. (2008) Database of Irish Lepidoptera. 1 - Macrohabitats, microsites and traits of Noctuidae and butterflies. Irish Wildlife Manual s, No. 35. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover photo: Merveille du Jour ( Dichonia aprilina ) © Veronica French Irish Wildlife Manuals Series Editors: F. Marnell & N. Kingston © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2008 ISSN 1393 – 6670 Database of Irish Lepidoptera ____________________________ CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ....................................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................2 The concept of the database.....................................................................................................................2 The structure of the database...................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]