DOCSLIB.ORG

Etd8.Pdf (27.96Kb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Etd8.Pdf (27.96Kb) Bibliography Abrams, Mark and Richard Rose. 1960. Must Labour Lose? London: Penguin. Alderman, Keith and Neil Carter. 1993. “The Labour Party Leadership and Deputy Leadership Elections of 1992.” Parliamentary Affairs 46:49-65. ________ and ______ . 1995. “The Labour Party Leadership and Deputy Leadership Elections of 1994.” Parliamentary Affairs 48:438-55. Allan, James P. 1996. ‘Structure and Agency in Comparative Politics: A Framework for the Study of Social Democratic Parties in Opposition.’ Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association -- South, Roanoke, VA., October 25-27. Althusser, Louis and Étienne Balibar. 1970. Reading Capital. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: NLB. Anderson, Perry. 1994. ‘Introduction’ in Anderson, Perry and Patrick Camiller, eds. Mapping the West European Left. London: Verso. Bhaskar, Roy. 1975. A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds: Leeds Books. _______ . 1983. “Beef, Structure and Place: Notes from a Critical Naturalist Perspective.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 13(1): 81-95. _______ . 1989. The Possibility of Naturalism, 2nd. Edition. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. _______ . 1989a. Reclaiming Reality. London: Verso. Bish, Geoff. 1979. ‘Working Relations Between Government and Party’ in Coates, Ken, ed. What Went Wrong?: Explaining the Fall of the Labour Government. Nottingham: Spokesman. ____ . 1979a. ‘Drafting the Manifesto’ in Coates, Ken, ed. What Went Wrong?: Explaining the Fall of the Labour Government. Nottingham: Spokesman. Blair, Tony. 1994. Socialism (Fabian Pamphlet 565). London: Fabian Society. _____ . 1995. Let Us Face the Future -- The 1945 Anniversary Lecture (Fabian Pamphlet 571). London: Fabian Society. Brand, Jack, James Mitchell and Paula Surridge. 1994. ‘Will Scotland Come to the Aid of the Party?’ in Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice, eds. Labour’s Last Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Butler, David and Donald Stokes. 1974. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice, Second Edition. London: Macmillan. Butler, David and Gareth Butler. 1994. British Political Facts, 1900-1994. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Butler, David and Dennis Kavanagh. 1984. The British General Election of 1983. London: Macmillan. ______ and ________ . 1988. The British General Election of 1987. New York: St. Martin’s Press. ______ and ________ . 1992. The British General Election of 1992. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 108 James P. Allan Bibliography 109 Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 36:245-70. Coates, David. 1996. “Labour Governments: Old Constraints and New Parameters.” New Left Review 219:62-77. Coates, Ken, ed. 1979. What Went Wrong?: Explaining the Fall of the Labour Government. Nottingham: Spokesman. Collier, Andrew. 1994. Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso. Collier, David and Deborah L. Norden. 1992. “Strategic Choice Models of Political Change in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 24:229-43. Cook, Robin. 1995. ‘The Labour Campaign.’ in Crewe, Ivor, and Brian Gosschalk, eds. Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1992. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cowley, Philip and Philip Norton. 1996. Blair’s Bastards: Discontent Within the Parliamentary Labour Party. University of Hull: Research Papers in Legislative Studies, No. 1. Craib, Ian. 1992. Anthony Giddens. London: Routledge. Craig, F. W. S., ed. 1990. British General Election Manifestos 1959-1987. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Crewe, Ivor. 1983. “Why Labour Lost the British Elections.” Public Opinion 6(3): 7ff. _____ . 1986. “On the Death and Resurrection of Class Voting: Some Comments on How Britain Votes.” Political Studies 34:620-38. _____ . 1988, ‘Has the Electorate Become Thatcherite?’ in Skidelsky, Robert, ed. Thatcherism. Oxford: Blackwell. Crewe, Ivor, and Martin Harrop, eds. 1989. Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1987. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crewe, Ivor, and Brian Gosschalk, eds. 1995. Political Communications: The General Election Campaign of 1992. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crewe, Ivor and Anthony King. 1995. SDP: The Birth, Life and Death of the Social Democratic Party. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crick, Bernard. 1984. Socialist Values and Time (Fabian Tract 495). London: Fabian Society. Crick, Michael. 1984. Militant. London: Faber and Faber. Croft, Stuart. 1992. ‘The Labour Party and the Nuclear Issue’ in Smith, Martin J. and Joanna Spear, eds. The Changing Labour Party. London: Routledge. Crosland, Anthony. 1957. The Future of Socialism. New York: Macmillan. ________ . 1960. Can Labour Win? London: Fabian Society. Curtice, John. 1996. ‘Is The Sun Shining on Tony Blair?’ Paper presented at the 1996 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (British Politics Group), San Francisco, CA., August 29 - September 1. Curtice, John, and Holli Semetko. 1994. ‘Does It Matter What The Papers Say?’ in Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice, eds. Labour’s Last Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth. James P. Allan Bibliography 110 Denver, David and Gordon Hands, eds. 1992. Issues and Controversies in British Electoral Behaviour. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Dessler, David.1989. “What’s At Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43:441-73. Diamond, Larry. 1992. “Economic Development and Democracy Reconsidered.” American Behavioral Scientist 35:450-99. Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. To Craft Democracies. Berkeley: University of California Press. Dunleavy, Patrick. 1987. “Class Dealignment in Britain Revisited.” West European Politics 10:400-19. Duverger, Maurice. 1964. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen. Evans, Geoffrey. 1994. ‘Tactical Voting and Labour’s Prospects.’ in Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice, eds. Labour’s Last Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Farnham, David. 1996. “New Labour, The New Unions and The New Labour Market.” Parliamentary Affairs 49:584-98. Fielding, Steven. 1995. Labour: Decline and Renewal. Manchester: Baseline Books. Franklin, Mark N. 1985. The Decline of Class Voting in Britain: Changes in the Basis of Electoral Choice, 1964-1983. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Garrett, Geoff. 1994. ‘Popular Capitalism: The Electoral Legacy of Thatcherism.’ in Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice, eds. Labour’s Last Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Giddens, Anthony. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson. _______ . 1981. A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism, Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press. _______ . 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press. Gregson, Nicky. 1989. ‘On the (Ir)relevance of Structuration Theory to Empirical Research.’ in Held, David and John B. Thompson, eds. Social Theory of Modern Societies: Anthony Giddens and His Critics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harrop, Martin. 1988. ‘Press’ in Butler, David and Dennis Kavanagh. The British General Election of 1987. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Harrop, Martin, and Margaret Scammell, 1992. ‘A Tabloid War’ in Butler, David and Dennis Kavanagh. The British General Election of 1992. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Hay, Colin. 1995. ‘Structure and Agency’ in Marsh, David and Gerry Stoker, eds. Theory and Methods in Political Science. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Heath, Anthony and Roger Jowell. 1994. ‘Labour’s Policy Review’ in Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice, eds. Labour’s Last Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell and John Curtice. 1985. How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon Press. James P. Allan Bibliography 111 _____ , ______ , and _______ . 1987. “Trendless Fluctuation: A Reply to Crewe.” Political Studies 35:256-77. _____ , ______ , and _______ . 1988. “Class Dealignment and the Explanation of Political Change: A Reply to Dunleavy.” West European Politics 11:146-8. _____ , ______ , and _______ . 1994. ‘Can Labour Win?’ in Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice, eds. Labour’s Last Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, and John Curtice, eds. 1994a. Labour’s Last Chance?: The 1992 Election and Beyond. Aldershot: Dartmouth. Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell, John Curtice, Geoff Evans, Julia Field and Sharon Witherspoon. 1989. Understanding Political Change: The British Voter 1964-1987. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Heffernan, Richard and Mike Marqusee. 1992. Defeat From The Jaws of Victory: Inside Kinnock’s Labour Party. London: Verso. Hughes, Colin and Patrick Wintour. 1990. Labour Rebuilt: The New Model Party. London: Fourth Estate. Hutton, Will. 1996. The State We’re In. London: Vintage. Jones, Tudor. 1996. Remaking the Labour Party: From Gaitskill to Blair. London: Routledge. Kellner, Peter. 1985. ‘The Labour Campaign’ in Ranney, Austin, ed. Britain at the Polls 1983. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. King, Anthony, ed. 1992. Britain at the Polls 1992. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers Inc. Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. ‘The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems.’ in La Palombara, Joseph, and Myron Weiner, eds. Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kitschelt,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 the Name of the Society Shall Be the Fabian Society
    RULES OF THE FABIAN SOCIETY 1 The name of the Society shall be the Fabian Society. 2 The Fabian Society consists of socialists. It therefore aims for a classless society, where a just distribution of wealth and power assures true equality of opportunity. It holds that society, through its democratic institutions, should determine the overall direction and distribution of economic activity, and seeks to promote where appropriate the social and co-operative ownership of economic resources. It argues for strong and accountable public institutions reflecting the values of public service to meet need. It believes in an active democracy, characterised by liberty, tolerance and respect for diversity. It aims at the implementation of the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and seeks the creation of effective international institutions to uphold and promote world peace and sustainable development. It seeks to secure these ends by the methods of political democracy. The Society, believing in equal citizenship in the fullest sense, is open to persons, irrespective of race, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability or creed, who commit themselves to its aims and purposes and undertake to promote its work. Its activities shall be the furtherance of socialism and the education of the public on socialist lines by the holding of meetings, lectures, discussion groups and conferences, the promotion of research into political, economic and social problems, national and international, the publication of books, pamphlets and periodicals, and by any other appropriate methods. The Society shall be affiliated to the Labour Party. 3 The Society as a whole shall have no collective policy beyond what is implied in Rule 2; its research shall be free and objective in its methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Fabian Society
    SOS POLITICAL SCIENCE & PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION M.A POLITICAL SCIENCE II SEM POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY: MODERN POLITICAL THOUGHT, THEORY & CONTEMPORARY IDEOLOGIES UNIT-III Topic Name-fabian socialism WHAT IS MEANT BY FABIAN SOCIALISM? • The Fabian Society is a British socialistorganisation whose purpose is to advance the principles of democratic socialism via gradualist and reformist effort in democracies, rather than by revolutionary overthrow WHO STARTED THE FABIAN SOCIETY? • Its nine founding members were Frank Podmore, Edward R. Pease, William Clarke, Hubert Bland, Percival Chubb, Frederick Keddell, H. H. Champion, Edith Nesbit, and Rosamund Dale Owen. WHO IS THE PROPOUNDER OF FABIAN SOCIALISM? • In the period between the two World Wars, the "Second Generation" Fabians, including the writers R. H. Tawney, G. D. H. Cole and Harold Laski, continued to be a major influence on socialistthought. But the general idea is that each man should have power according to his knowledge and capacity. WHAT IS THE FABIAN POLICY? • The Fabian strategy is a military strategy where pitched battles and frontal assaults are avoided in favor of wearing down an opponent through a war of attrition and indirection. While avoiding decisive battles, the side employing this strategy harasses its enemy through skirmishes to cause attrition, disrupt supply and affect morale. Employment of this strategy implies that the side adopting this strategy believes time is on its side, but it may also be adopted when no feasible alternative strategy can be devised. HISTORY • This
    [Show full text]
  • Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations
    The University of Manchester Research Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Barclay, A., Sobolewska, M., & Ford, R. (2019). Political realignment of British Jews: Testing competing explanations. Electoral Studies, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102063 Published in: Electoral Studies Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:09. Oct. 2021 Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations. Andrew Barclay School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Maria Sobolewska School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Prof. Robert Ford School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester Manuscript accepted for publication by Electoral Studies How to cite: Barclay, Andrew. Sobolewska, Maria. & Ford, Robert (2019) “Political Realignment of British Jews: Testing Competing Explanations” Electoral Studies, 61 1 Political realignment of British Jews: testing competing explanations.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bernard Shaw, the Fabian Society, and Reconstructionist Education Policy: the London School of Economics and Political Science
    George Bernard Shaw, the Fabian Society, and Reconstructionist Education Policy: the London School of Economics and Political Science Jim McKernan East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA “He who can does, He who cannot teaches” (G.B. Shaw) Introduction When four members of the Executive Committee of the newly founded Fabian Society 1 met at Sidney Webb’s summer house at Borough Farm, near Godalming, Surrey, on the morning of 4 August, 1894 there was exciting news. The four left-wing intellectual radicals present were: Beatrice and Sidney Webb, Graham Wallas, (of the London School Board) and George Bernard Shaw. Sidney told the breakfast group of a letter he had received the previous day from Henry Hunt Hutchinson, a Derby solicitor who left his estate, a sum of ten thousand pounds sterling, to be used by the Fabian Society for its purposes. It appears that Sidney Webb probably initiated the idea of a London Economics Research School, but had the sound practical support and advice of Shaw and later, the financial support of Shaw’s wife, Charlotte Frances Payne-Townshend, an Irishwoman from Derry, County Cork. This paper explores the social reconstructionist educational and social policies employed by both the Webbs and George Bernard Shaw in establishing the London School of Economics and Political Science as a force to research and solve fundamental social problems like poverty in the United Kingdom in the late Nineteenth Century. That schools might function as agencies for dealing with the reformation of socio-economic problems has been a prime tenet of reconstructionist educational theory . 2 Social reconstructionist thought as an educational policy emerged in the USA from the time of the Great Depression of the 1930’s until the Civil Rights period of the 1960’s and many see it as a pre-cursor to critical theory in education.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2007–8
    School of Advanced Study University of London annual report 2007–8 www.sas.ac.uk he School of Advanced Study unites the Tinternationally-known research institutes in the humanities and social sciences at the centre of the University of London, maintaining and developing their resources for the benefit of the national and international scholarly community. Founded in 1994, the School has worked to develop intellectual links between its Institutes and the diverse constituencies that they represent, to foster the model of advanced study that they stand for, and to provide a focus for scholars from the widest possible backgrounds within the disciplines that it covers. Through its many activities, the unrivalled libraries of its Institutes, its electronic research resources, its Fellowship programmes, and the scholarly expertise of its members, it aims to provide an environment for the support, evaluation and pursuit of research which is accessible to postgraduate and senior members of all Higher Education institutions in the United Kingdom and abroad. Cover image: Photograph by Oliver Blaiklock, winning entry in the 2008 University of London photography competition. Copyright University of London. Unless otherwise stated, all other images are also copyright of the University of London Contents I SCHOOL ACTIVITIES I SCHOOL I SCHOOL ACTIVITIES Dean’s Foreword.................................................................................................................................. 4 Governance ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values
    proceedings of the British Academy, 78, 9-29 Mrs. Thatcher’s Return to Victorian Values RAPHAEL SAMUEL University of Oxford I ‘VICTORIAN’was still being used as a routine term of opprobrium when, in the run-up to the 1983 election, Mrs. Thatcher annexed ‘Victorian values’ to her Party’s platform and turned them into a talisman for lost stabilities. It is still commonly used today as a byword for the repressive just as (a strange neologism of the 1940s) ‘Dickensian’ is used as a short-hand expression to describe conditions of squalor and want. In Mrs. Thatcher’s lexicon, ‘Victorian’ seems to have been an interchangeable term for the traditional and the old-fashioned, though when the occasion demanded she was not averse to using it in a perjorative sense. Marxism, she liked to say, was a Victorian, (or mid-Victorian) ideo1ogy;l and she criticised ninetenth-century paternalism as propounded by Disraeli as anachronistic.2 Read 12 December 1990. 0 The British Academy 1992. Thanks are due to Jonathan Clark and Christopher Smout for a critical reading of the first draft of this piece; to Fran Bennett of Child Poverty Action for advice on the ‘Scroungermania’ scare of 1975-6; and to the historians taking part in the ‘History Workshop’ symposium on ‘Victorian Values’ in 1983: Gareth Stedman Jones; Michael Ignatieff; Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall. Margaret Thatcher, Address to the Bow Group, 6 May 1978, reprinted in Bow Group, The Right Angle, London, 1979. ‘The Healthy State’, address to a Social Services Conference at Liverpool, 3 December 1976, in Margaret Thatcher, Let Our Children Grow Tall, London, 1977, p.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] FST Journal Publishes Summaries of All the Talks Given at Its Meetings
    journal The Journal of The Foundation for Science and Technology fstVolume 22 Number 2 March 2018 www.foundation.org.uk Editorial Sir David Cannadine: The role of the Academies in providing independent advice to Government An industrial strategy for the UK Lord Hennessy: Searching for a strategy that makes a difference Lord Heseltine: Establishing a strategy for the whole economy Lord Willetts: A tension at the heart of Government activity A business strategy for Scotland Professor Iain Gray: Translating research excellence into economic benefit Nora Senior: Plugging gaps in performance Dame Susan Rice: An ecosystem for business Paul Wheelhouse: Driving innovation Meeting air quality targets Dr Stephen Bryce: The energy emissions challenge Professor Frank Kelly: The health consequences of air pollution Diagnosing cancer earlier Sir Harpal Kumar: Early diagnosis has the potential to transform patient outcomes Dr Clare Turnbull: Using genetics to combat cancer The rise of machine learning Dr Mike Lynch: An opportunity or a threat to society? Dr Claire Craig: Giving society the confidence to embrace opportunities Amir Saffari: The potential to augment human efforts Dame Wendy Hall: The opportunities for the UK Comment Norman Lamb: The future of social care Obituary The Rt Hon Sir Brian Neill COUNCIL AND TRUSTEES COUNCIL CHIEF EXECUTIVE Chair Dr Dougal Goodman OBE FREng The Earl of Selborne* GBE FRS Deputy Chairs The Baroness O’Neill of Bengarve* CH CBE FBA FRS FMedSci Dr Mike Lynch* OBE FRS FREng DL President, The Royal Society Professor
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Development of the Fabian Society, 1884-1900
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1986 The Origins and Development of the Fabian Society, 1884-1900 Stephen J. O'Neil Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation O'Neil, Stephen J., "The Origins and Development of the Fabian Society, 1884-1900" (1986). Dissertations. 2491. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2491 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1986 Stephen J. O'Neil /11/ THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE FABIAN SOCIETY, 1884-1900 by Stephen J. O'Neil A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 1986 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work is the product of research over several years' span. Therefore, while I am endebted to many parties my first debt of thanks must be to my advisor Dr. Jo Hays of the Department of History, Loyola University of Chicago; for without his continuing advice and assistance over these years, this project would never have been completed. I am also grateful to Professors Walker and Gutek of Loyola who, as members of my dissertation committee, have also provided many sug­ gestions and continual encouraqement in completing this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2. 1979-83: Weak Agency and Labour's Electoral Nadir
    Chapter 2. 1979-83: Weak Agency and Labour’s Electoral Nadir Introduction The period from 1979 to 1983 represented, in more ways than one, a nadir for the Labour Party. The 1974-9 government was brought down on a vote of no confidence following a winter of industrial action. Many felt that Callaghan should have called the election in late 1978, when Labour’s electoral prospects seemed better, and in hindsight it appears difficult to disagree. Nonetheless, on May 3, 1979, the Conservative Party won a majority of 43 seats in the House of Commons, and Margaret Thatcher became Britain’s first woman prime minister. Table 2.1: British General Election Results, 1979 and 1983.1 Party MPs % Share of Votes 1979 1983 1979 1983 Conservative 339 397 43.9 42.4 Labour 269 209 36.9 27.6 Lib/SDP Alliance 11 23 13.8 25.4 Plaid Cymru 2 2 0.4 0.4 Scottish National Party 2 2 1.6 1.1 Others 12 17 3.4 3.1 Total 635 650 100.0 100.0 Within the next four years things went from bad to worse for Labour. The Party experienced a period of intense in-fighting which undermined the Party’s credibility and led to the creation in 1981 of a new centre-left party in the shape of the Social Democratic Party (SDP). At the 1983 general election, as Table 2.1 shows, the Party barely managed to finish in second place behind the Conservatives in terms of votes won, and had its worst electoral performance (in terms of its share of total votes cast) since the First World War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Imperialists: a Study of British Labour Party
    THE LABOUR IMPERIALISTS: A STUDY OF BRITISH LABOUR PARTY LEADERSHIP ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE EMPIRE IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY by GARY MADISON SAUNDERS B.A., University of British Columbia, 1965 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of History We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 1981 (c) Gary Madison Saunders, 1981 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia 2075 Wesbrook Place Vancouver, Canada V6T 1W5 Date . ABSTRACT The attitudes toward the empire of a small group of Labour Party spokesmen are compared in this thesis. Considered collectively these attitudes suggest that the Labour Party had developed a distinctive form of imperialism which was derived from a reasoned evaluation of the needs and aspirations of the dependent peoples. The historiography of the Labour Party indicates some Labour interest in the peoples of the empire, but it has not, as yet, systematically examined the collective views of key Labour leaders. It would seem that historians have assumed generally that, except for the Fabian Society, the Labour Party was decidedly anti-imperialistic.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Recapturing Labour's Traditions? History, Nostalgia and the Re-Writing
    Recapturing Labour’s Traditions? History, nostalgia and the re-writing of Clause IV Dr Emily Robinson University of Nottingham The making of New Labour has received a great deal of critical attention, much of which has inevitably focused on the way in which it placed itself in relation to past and future, its inheritances and its iconoclasm.1 Nick Randall is right to note that students of New Labour have been particularly interested in ‘questions of temporality’ because ‘New Labour so boldly advanced a claim to disrupt historical continuity’.2 But it is not only academics who have contributed to this analysis. Many of the key figures associated with New Labour have also had their say. The New Labour project was not just about ‘making history’ in terms of its practical actions; the writing up of that history seems to have been just as important. As early as 1995 Peter Mandelson and Roger Liddle were preparing a key text designed ‘to enable everyone to understand better why Labour changed and what it has changed into’.3 This was followed in 1999 by Phillip Gould’s analysis of The Unfinished Revolution: How the Modernisers Saved the Labour Party, which motivated Dianne Hayter to begin a PhD in order to counteract the emerging consensus that the modernisation process began with the appointment of Gould and Mandelson in 1983. The result of this study was published in 2005 under the title Fightback! Labour’s Traditional Right in the 1970s and 1980s and made the case for a much longer process of modernisation, strongly tied to the trade unions.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of the Fabian Society
    RULES OF THE FABIAN SOCIETY 1 The name of the Society shall be the Fabian Society. 2 The Fabian Society consists of socialists. It therefore aims for a classless society, where a just distribution of wealth and power assures true equality of opportunity. It holds that society, through its democratic institutions, should determine the overall direction and distribution of economic activity, and seeks to promote where appropriate the social and co-operative ownership of economic resources. It argues for strong and accountable public institutions reflecting the values of public service to meet need. It believes in an active democracy, characterised by liberty, tolerance and respect for diversity. It aims at the implementation of the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and seeks the creation of effective international institutions to uphold and promote world peace and sustainable development. It seeks to secure these ends by the methods of political democracy. The Society, believing in equal citizenship in the fullest sense, is open to persons, irrespective of race, gender, sexual orientation, age or creed, who commit themselves to its aims and purposes and undertake to promote its work. Its activities shall be the furtherance of socialism and the education of the public on socialist lines by the holding of meetings, lectures, discussion groups and conferences, the promotion of research into political, economic and social problems, national and international, the publication of books, pamphlets and periodicals, and by any other appropriate methods. The Society shall be affiliated to the Labour Party. 3 The Society as a whole shall have no collective policy beyond what is implied in Rule 2; its research shall be free and objective in its methods.
    [Show full text]