DOCSLIB.ORG

FS1's UFC BEST of 2016 Prime Time Marathon Kicks Off

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FS1's UFC BEST of 2016 Prime Time Marathon Kicks Off FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: John Stouffer Thursday, March 9, 2017 [email protected] FS1’S UFC BEST OF 2016 PRIME TIME MARATHON KICKS OFF MONDAY, MARCH 13 Net Features 2016’s Best Fighters and Biggest Fights over Two Weeks LOS ANGELES – FS1 presents the Ultimate Fighting Championship’s (UFC) best fighters and biggest fights of 2016 across two weeks of prime time action with the UFC BEST OF 2016 programming marathon starting Monday, March 13 (7:00 PM ET). The two action-packed weeks are anchored by 14 show premieres and 27 hours of UFC-specific programming on FS1 Monday through Thursday evenings. The marathon’s opening night features the premiere of UFC MAIN EVENT: BISPING VS. HENDERSON 2 (9:00 PM ET), revisiting UFC 204’s epic title fight between UFC middleweight champion Michael Bisping and Dan Henderson. Wednesday evening sees a new episode of UFC TONIGHT (8:00 PM ET) followed by the premiere of UFC MAIN EVENT: HOLM VS. TATE (9:00 PM ET) and the first airing of a must-see UFC ULTIMATE KNOCKOUTS: BEST OF 2016 (10:30 PM ET). The second week’s premieres include UFC UNLEASHED: RISING STARS OF 2016 on Monday, March 20 (7:00 PM ET), UFC SOUND WAVES on Tuesday, March 21 (7:00 PM ET) and UFC TOP TEN on Thursday, March 23 (7:00 PM ET), among others. The following is a breakdown of the FS1’s UFC BEST OF 2016 programming: Monday, March 13 8:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: LAWLER VS. CONDIT 9:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: DILLASHAW VS. CRUZ 10:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: BISPING VS. HENDERSON 2 (premiere) 11:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: CRUZ V. FABER (premiere) Tuesday, March 14 8:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: JEDRZEJCZYK VS. GADELHA 2 (premiere) 11:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: SILVA VS. BISPING Wednesday, March 15 8:00 PM ET: UFC TONIGHT (premiere) 9:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: HOLM VS. TATE (premiere) 10:00 PM ET: UFC FIGHT FLASHBACK: MCGREGOR VS. DIAZ 10:30 PM ET: UFC ULTIMATE KNOCKOUTS: BEST OF 2016 (premiere) Thursday, March 16 8:00 PM ET: UFC RELOADED: UFC 200: TATE VS. NUNES Monday, March 20 7:00 PM ET: UFC UNLEASHED: RISING STARS OF 2016 (premiere) 8:00 PM ET: UFC RELOADED: UFC 202: DIAZ VS. MCGREGOR 2 Tuesday, March 21 7:00 PM ET: UFC SOUND WAVES (premiere) 7:30 PM ET: UFC SOUND WAVES (premiere) 8:00 PM ET: UFC RELOADED: UFC 205: ALVAREZ VS. MCGREGOR Wednesday, March 22 7:00 PM ET: UFC MAIN EVENT: MIOCIC VS. OVEREEM/CM PUNK VS. GALL (premiere) 8:00 PM ET: UFC TONIGHT (premiere) 9:00 PM ET: UFC 206: SPECIAL PRESENTATION Thursday, March 23 7:00 PM ET: UFC TOP TEN (premiere) 7:30 PM ET: UFC TOP TEN (premiere) 8:00 PM ET: UFC RELOADED: UFC 207: NUNES VS. ROUSEY (premiere) --FOX SPORTS-- .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UFC Fight Night: Dos Anjos Vs
    UFC Fight Night: Dos Anjos vs. Alvarez Live Main Card Highlights UFC 200 Fight Week Coverage on Fight Network Toronto – Fight Network, the world’s premier 24/7 multi- platform channel dedicated to complete coverage of combat sports, today announced extensive live coverage for UFC International Fight Week™ in Las Vegas, the biggest week in UFC history, highlighted by a live broadcast of the main card for UFC FIGHT NIGHT®: DOS ANJOS vs. ALVAREZ from the MGM Grand Garden Arena on Thursday, July 7 at 10 p.m. ET, plus the live prelims for THE ULTIMATE FIGHTER FINALE®: Team Joanna vs. Team Claudia on Friday, July 8 at 8 p.m. ET. Fight Network will air the live UFC FIGHT NIGHT®: DOS ANJOS vs. ALVAREZ main card across Canada on July 7 at 10 p.m. ET, preceded by a live Pre-Show at 9 p.m. ET. In the main event, dominant UFC lightweight champion Rafael dos Anjos (24-7) puts his championship on the line in a five- round barnburner against top contender Eddie Alvarez (27-4). In other featured bouts, Roy “Big Country” Nelson (22-12) throws down with Derrick “The Black Beast” Lewis (15-4, 1NC) in an explosive heavyweight collision, Alan Jouban (13-4) takes on undefeated Belal Muhammad (9-0) in a welterweight affair, plus “Irish” Joe Duffy (14-2) welcomes Canada’s Mitch “Danger Zone” Clarke (11-3) back to action in a lightweight matchup. Live fight week coverage begins on Wednesday, July 6 at 2 p.m. ET with a live presentation of the final UFC 200 pre-fight press conference, featuring UFC president Dana White and main card superstars Jon Jones, Daniel Cormier, Brock Lesnar, Mark Hunt, Miesha Tate, Amanda Nunes, Jose Aldo and Frankie Edgar.
    [Show full text]
  • Estta929927 10/22/2018 in the United States Patent And
    Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA929927 Filing date: 10/22/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91244214 Party Plaintiff Zuffa, LLC Correspondence M. Feder, J. Krieger, R. Kouchoukos Address Dickinson Wright PLLC 8363 West Sunset Road, Ste. 200 Las Vegas, NV 89113 UNITED STATES [email protected] 7025504400 Submission Other Motions/Papers Filer's Name Robert B. Kouchoukos Filer's email [email protected] Signature /Robert B. Kouchoukos/ Date 10/22/2018 Attachments Errata to notice of opposition to submit exhibits.pdf(4071891 bytes ) IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Zuffa, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Mark: Opposer, v. Patrick A. Whitney, an individual domiciled in Maryland. Applicant. Opposition No.: 91244214 Ser. No.: 87197128 Published: June 26, 2018 Class: 41 ERRATA TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION Opposer by and through their attorneys hereby amend its Notice of Opposition timely filed on October 18, 2018, to submit referenced Exhibit 1, which was inadvertently omitted from the electronic filing. Dated: October 22, 2018. Respectfully submitted, DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC /Robert B. Kouchoukos/ Michael N. Feder, Esq. [email protected] John L. Krieger, Esq. [email protected] Robert B. Kouchoukos, Esq. [email protected] 8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89113 (702) 550-4400 (phone) (844) 670-6009 (fax) ERRATA TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION I hereby certify that, on October 22, 2018, a true and complete copy of the foregoing ERRATA TO NOTICE OF OPPOSITION has been served by electronic mail on the Applicant to: Patrick A.
    [Show full text]
  • Impoliteness Strategies in Ufc Press Conference
    IMPOLITENESS STRATEGIES IN UFC PRESS CONFERENCE THESIS BY: SOFIYAN HADI REG. NUMBER: A73216132 ENGLISH DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA 2020 ABSTRACT Hadi, Sofiyan. (2020). Impoliteness Strategies in UFC Press Conference. English Department, Faculty of Arts and Humanities. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Advisor: Dr. A. Dzo'ul Milal, M.Pd. Keywords; Impoliteness, Politeness, Press Conference, Entertainment. __________________________________________________________________ This thesis aimed at examining the use of impoliteness in the UFC Press Conference. The phenomena of impoliteness can be found in any human interaction. It also can be found in any situation. One of them is entertainment. One of the entertainments show is UFC. This thesis examines the impoliteness strategies in UFC Press Conference. This study aims to analyze the use of impoliteness done by Conor McGregor and its responses done by Khabib Nurmagomedov. Furthermore, this thesis also analyzes entertainment factors that trigger the use of impoliteness done by McGregor. The press conference of UFC 229 between Conor McGregor and Khabib Nurmagomedov is selected as the data of this study. In this research, the researcher applies Culpeper's (2005) framework about impoliteness and its responses. Moreover, Culpeper’s theory about generic factors is applied. The researcher in this study applies a qualitative approach. In order to collect the data, the researcher transcribes press conference video into transcription text. The researcher underlines and gives codes to all sentences, words, and phrases that contain impoliteness and their responses. Since this study is in the entertainment area, the researcher interprets the data in order to examine the entertainment factors that trigger the use of McGregor's impoliteness.
    [Show full text]
  • UFC Drug Testing Policy
    Joseph Peer Research paper rough draft SPM-373 UFC Drug Testing Policies and History Introduction The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) has a very long history of an ever evolving drug testing policy for its over five hundred athletes. It started in a very crude form, much like the UFC itself, when it began with no gloves, no weight classes, and almost no actual rules. Years ago, the UFC began working with the United States Anti-Doping Agency, to help regulate drug testing and keep the athletes in check. Subsequently, its drug testing, and anti-doping policies went from basically non-existent, to being so strong and controlling that it has become controversial how much power has been given to the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) over the UFC’s athletes. There have been many controversial cases involving everything from tainted urine samples to completely over the top ridiculous punishments for smaller violations. Where did the UFC start from with its drug testing policies, where is it today, and where is it heading in the future? It is very obvious the USADA and the UFC’s fighters are far from agreement on many of the policies, and punishments. Drug Testing Policy The drug testing policy for the UFC has evolved quite a bit since it came into existence, with the main concern being anti-doping. First, doping is defined as the occurrence of one or more of the Anti-Doping Policy Violations set forth in Article 2.1 through Article 2.10 of the Anti-Doping Policy (“UFC Anti-Doping Policy,” 2015 p.#3) These articles cover every possible way an athlete may use, abuse, possess or illegally be in contact with any performance enhancing drug (PED).
    [Show full text]
  • Let's Get Ready to Unbundle!
    LET’S GET READY TO UNBUNDLE! It’s Time for the UFC to Offer Individual Fights for Purchase Nick Cornor Abstract A bedrock principle of U.S. Copyright law normally dictates that when a person steals your original work of authorship, a court should issue an injunc- tion and require the violator to pay damages. For centuries this principle has sufficed; however, a lack of deep-pocket defendants and continued lobbying efforts by internet service providers have made this principle untenable when applied to illegal online streaming. This is especially true for the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC), a mixed martial arts promoter that has seen its live broadcasts pirated over the internet at an alarming rate, thereby threaten- ing the bulk of its revenue. This Comment advocates that the UFC unbundle its current pay- per-view business model in favor of charging market-based prices for each individual fight. The primary benefit of this approach includes increased rev- enue for the UFC by enticing consumers away from illegal online streaming with lower prices. Potential adjacent benefits include reforming fighter com- pensation schemes, incentivizing fighters to promote their own individual fights, easing controversies regarding unionization efforts by the fighters, and providing the UFC with greater marketing data. Therefore, by unbundling its business model, the UFC will ultimately be able to bypass the shortcomings of U.S. Copyright law and take the lead in a digital media landscape already changing at lightning speeds. * J.D., South Texas College of Law Houston; M.A., University of Oklahoma, 2013; B.S. University of Texas at Arlington, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ultimate Fighting Championship and Zuffa: from ‘Human Cock-Fighting' to Market Power Carl J
    American University Business Law Review Volume 6 | Issue 3 Article 4 2017 The Ultimate Fighting Championship and Zuffa: From ‘Human Cock-Fighting' to Market Power Carl J. Gaul IV American University Washington College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aublr Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons Recommended Citation Gaul, Carl J. IV "The Ultimate Fighting Championship and Zuffa: rF om ‘Human Cock-Fighting' to Market Power," American University Business Law Review, Vol. 6, No. 3 (). Available at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aublr/vol6/iss3/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Business Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP AND ZUFFA: FROM ‘HUMAN COCK-FIGHTING’ TO MARKET POWER CARL J. GAUL IV* The Ultimate Fighting Championship (“UFC”) is the premier mixed martial arts (“MMA”) promotion in the world and is the most recent athletic organization to attain a dominant market share that arguably constitutes a monopoly or monopsony. Antitrust law prohibits organizations from restraining trade or intentionally stamping out market place competition to attain or maintain monopoly power. The UFC’s behavior has raised significant concerns about competition in two separate markets: the MMA Promotional Market and Elite MMA Labor Market. While the MMA Promotional Market appears more competitive than it has ever been, the Elite MMA Labor Market has seen significant reductions in competition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Rivalry Antecedents on Mediated Demand for an Individual Sport
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Human Movement Sciences Faculty Publications Human Movement Sciences 2017 The mpI act of Rivalry Antecedents on Mediated Demand for an Individual Sport Lamar Reams Old Dominion University Terry Eddy Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/hms_fac_pubs Part of the Marketing Commons, Movement and Mind-Body Therapies Commons, and the Sports Sciences Commons Repository Citation Reams, Lamar and Eddy, Terry, "The mpI act of Rivalry Antecedents on Mediated Demand for an Individual Sport" (2017). Human Movement Sciences Faculty Publications. 40. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/hms_fac_pubs/40 Original Publication Citation Reams, L., & Eddy, T. (2017). The impact of rivalry antecedents on mediated demand for an individual sport. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 26(4), 247-260. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Human Movement Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Human Movement Sciences Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 2017, 26, 247-260 © 2017 West Virginia University The Impact of Rivalry Antecedents on Mediated Demand for an Individual Sport Lamar Reams and Terry Eddy Lamar Reams, PhD, is an assistant professor and graduate program coordinator for sport management in the Department of Human Movement Sciences at Old Dominion University. His research interests include sport marketing, consumer behavior, and combat sports. Terry Eddy, PhD, is an assistant professor of sport management in the Department of Kinesiology at the University of Windsor. His research centers around sport marketing; particularly sponsorship, consumer behavior, and social media marketing.
    [Show full text]
  • Arbitration Award Pursuant to the Ufc Arbitration Rules
    ARBITRATION AWARD PURSUANT TO THE UFC ARBITRATION RULES JON JONES, Applicant, vs. UNITED STATES ANTI-DOPING AGENCY ("USADA") Respondent. AWARD 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. In this, the inaugural proceeding before the UFC Arbitration Panel the issue is as to the appropriate sanction under the UFC ADP rules for an admitted anti-doping policy violation ("ADPV") by Jon Jones ("the Applicant"). 1.2. The Applicant contends that he took a product, which he believed to be a pill of "Cialis"; a medicine whose absence from the WADA prohibited list he had previously checked with his agent, but which unbeknown, indeed unknowable, by him, was contaminated. Therefore he bore, he asserts, at most a light degree of fault in taking it. USADA ("the Respondent") does not accept that explanation and in any event asserts that the Applicant's fault was significant. 1.3. Cialis is itself not a prohibited substance but a legitimate erectile dysfunction medication; its purpose is to enhance sexual not sporting performance. It is manufactured by the well-known 1 pharmacist Eli Lilly and is the brand name of its active agent Tadalafil. 1.4. The product that the Applicant claims to have taken was also called Tadalafil and purported to have the same properties. It was, however, manufactured by the company selling under the name "AllAmericanPeptide.com" ("All American Peptide") to standards far less rigorous than those required by the US Food and Drugs Administration ("the FDA"). 2. THE PARTIES 2.1. The Applicant is a 29-year old mixed martial art (MMA) fighter, with a record of 29-1.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] SCOTT INGOLD, ESQ. (NV Bar No
    Case 2:17-cv-00085 Document 1 Filed 01/10/17 Page 1 of 27 1 CHRISTINA DENNING, ESQ. (CA Bar No. 211137- Pro Hac Vice Pending) 2 [email protected] SCOTT INGOLD, ESQ. (NV Bar No. 11818) 3 [email protected] Higgs Fletcher & Mack LLP 4 401 West “A” Street, Suite 2600 5 San Diego, CA 92101-7913 T: 619.236.1551 6 F: 619.696.1410 7 JAMES HOLTZ, ESQ. (NV Bar No. 8119) 8 [email protected] 9 LAW OFFICE OF JAMES F. HOLTZ 1120 Town Center Drive, Suite 200 10 Las Vegas, NV 89144 11 T: 702.304.1803 F: 702.304.1822 12 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff MARK HUNT 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 16 MARK HUNT, an individual, Case No.: 17 Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF MARK HUNT’S 18 v. COMPLAINT FOR: 1. RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND 19 ZUFFA, LLC d/b/a ULTIMATE CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT 20 FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP, a (RICO) [18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq.]; Nevada limited liability company; 2. CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT CRIME 21 BROCK LESNAR, an individual; RELATED TO RACKETEERING DANA WHITE, an individual; and 22 (NRS § 207.350 et seq.); DOES 1-50, inclusive, 3. FRAUD (NRS § 205.377); 23 4. FALSE PRETENSES (NRS § 205.380); Defendants. 24 5. BREACH OF CONTRACT; 6. BREACH OF COVENANT OF GOOD 25 FAITH AND FAIR DEALING; 26 7. NEGLIGENCE; and 8. UNJUST ENRICHMENT. 27 [JURY DEMAND] 28 HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP A TTO RN EY S A T L AW PLAINTIFF MARK HUNT’S COMPLAINT SA N D IEGO Case 2:17-cv-00085 Document 1 Filed 01/10/17 Page 2 of 27 1 Plaintiff MARK HUNT (“HUNT”)1, alleges the following against 2 Defendants ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a ULTIMATE FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIP 3 (“UFC”), BROCK LESNAR, an individual (“LESNAR”), DANA WHITE 4 (“WHITE”), an individual, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive (collectively 5 “Defendants”).
    [Show full text]
  • BREAKING NEWS: Rafael Dos Anjos Pulls out of Main Event Fight with Connor Mcgregor at UFC 196
    BREAKING NEWS: Rafael dos Anjos Pulls Out of Main Event Fight With Connor McGregor at UFC 196 Author : Robert D. Cobb LAS VEGAS, Nevada- A broken foot has caused Rafael dos Anjos to withdraw from next week's UFC 196 main event fight against Conor McGregor for the Lightweight Championship. It was a huge fight that had the entire sports world buzzing. Thus far no replacement has been named but several names are currently being thrown around. Frankie Edgar has been asking for a shot at 145 against McGregor for quite some time and this may be his chance if he is willing to fight on short notice. A rematch for the 145 belt with Jose Aldo would be a huge money maker as was the original, however the chance of Aldo taking a fight on short notice are slim to none. There is more of a chance of that happening at UFC 200 in Dallas. McGregor, the current featherweight champion, was on the verge of history, as he was hoping to become the first fighter in the promotion's history to hold two belts at the same. If anyone could do it, it was him as he has been as close to unstoppable as possible since his entrance into the UFC. As mentioned by me yesterday, in regards to Donald Cerrone, this may be his chance to step into a big fight as well at 170 with McGregor. I would not be shocked to see that occur. If no replacement for Rafeal dos Anjos is named, the UFC will scratch the main event and promote the Holly Holm vs.
    [Show full text]
  • “UFC Pay-Per-View Buys and the Value of the Celebrity Fighter”
    “UFC pay-per-view buys and the value of the celebrity fighter” AUTHORS Thomas R. Robbins James E. Zemanek, Jr. Thomas R. Robbins, James E. Zemanek and Jr. (2017). UFC pay-per-view buys ARTICLE INFO and the value of the celebrity fighter. Innovative Marketing , 13(4), 35-46. doi:10.21511/im.13(4).2017.04 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.13(4).2017.04 RELEASED ON Thursday, 21 December 2017 RECEIVED ON Thursday, 16 November 2017 ACCEPTED ON Saturday, 16 December 2017 LICENSE This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License JOURNAL "Innovative Marketing " ISSN PRINT 1814-2427 ISSN ONLINE 1816-6326 PUBLISHER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” FOUNDER LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives” NUMBER OF REFERENCES NUMBER OF FIGURES NUMBER OF TABLES 59 5 3 © The author(s) 2021. This publication is an open access article. businessperspectives.org Innovative Marketing, Volume 13, Issue 4, 2017 Thomas R. Robbins (USA), James E. Zemanek, Jr. (USA) UFC pay-per-view buys and the value of the celebrity fighter Abstract In 2016, the Ultimate Fighting Championship was sold for a reported price of $4 billion, the highest price ever paid for a sports franchise. This was a remarkable turn-around for a promotion that 15 years earlier was saved from bankruptcy by a $2 million buyout. This turnaround was driven by the UFC’s ability to mainstream the promotion and the sport while establishing reliable revenue streams through television contracts and massive pay-per-view events. In this paper, the authors review the pay-per-view record of the UFC and analyze the extent to which it is driven by high profile celebrity fighters with broad crossover appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • LVGEA-Sportsoutlook
    PREPARED FOR NOVEMBER 2018 SOUTHERN NEVADA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT 2019OUTLOOK PREPARED BY Special Thanks Applied Analysis would like to extend a special thank you to the team at Las In addition to the support from the LVGEA, Applied Analysis would like to Vegas Global Economic Alliance (LVGEA) for the opportunity to conduct recognize the tremendous research efforts of the Las Vegas Convention and the necessary research and develop this evaluation of the sports and Visitors Authority (LVCVA) and their commitment to the tourism industry and entertainment industry in Southern Nevada. investments in market-based research. Without the research and reporting efforts of the LVCVA Research Center, much of the analysis contained herein would not be possible. Applied Analysis, a Nevada-based economic research and analysis consultancy, was retained by the LVGEA to review and analyze the sports and entertainment industry in Southern Nevada. The study includes highlights of the state of the industry, economic contributions to the local economy and a forward-looking assessment. This analysis is not intended to provide an all-encompassing analysis of the industry; the research is intended to highlight the state of the industry, the impact of sports venues, professional sports teams and other special events. The analysis also contemplates the impacts these sectors have on the Southern Nevada economy. Forward-looking estimates are based on an unconstrained environment (e.g., labor availability) and does not attempt to quantify the impact of broader, national
    [Show full text]