Cooperation, Land Use, and the Environment in Uxin Ju
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Cooperation, Land Use, and the Environment in Uxin Ju: The Changing Landscape of a Mongolian-Chinese Borderland in China Author(s): Hong Jiang Source: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 94, No. 1 (Mar., 2004), pp. 117-139 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Association of American Geographers Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3694071 . Accessed: 16/10/2014 15:40 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. and Association of American Geographers are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annals of the Association of American Geographers. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 80.188.25.114 on Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:40:22 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Cooperation,Land Use, and the Environment in Uxin Ju: The Changing Landscape of a Mongolian-ChineseBorderland in China HongJiang DepartmentofGeography, University ofWisconsin at Madison and Institute of ResourcesScience, Beijing Normal University Human-environmentalstudies have done much to examineenvironmental consequences of conflictualpolitics but havepaid scant attention to landscapeimplications of cooperation, especially when that cooperation is adoptedby a groupthat is seenas politically less powerful. This article examines cooperative politics and its consequences for land useand the environmentin UxinJu, a Mongol-dominatedborder area in China.Since the 1980s,in the contextof China'seconomic reform, land use in UxinJu has become more intensified, and the identification of the Mongolian culturehas shifted from land-use practices to symbolicfeatures such as language and heritage. Much of the change hasbeen influenced by the Mongols'cooperative relationship with the Chinesestate and the HanChinese people. The Mongolshave participated actively in the state'sproject of economicmodernization and have utilizedtheir accessto Chinesetechnology and laborers to theirown advantagein bringingabout land-use change that helps strengthentheir economicwell-being. This cooperativerelationship and its impacton land use have to be understoodin the historicalcontext of Uxin Ju as a Mongolian-Chineseborderland, the broadsocioeconomic transformationthat is takingplace in China,and the contemporaryexperience of Mongoliancultural change. The environmentaloutcome of suchcooperation, however, is rathermixed. On the sandydryland of UxinJu, as parts of thelandscape are improved, other parts are sandified. The entire landscape has become more homogenized spatially; thus,its regenerative capacity is compromised.This calls into question any a prioricorrespondence between forms of politicsand environmental consequences. Key Words: Politics, environmental change, Mongolian-Chinese interaction, culturalidentity, cultural and political ecology. uman-environmentalstudies have done much cated picture than the typically reported scenario of to examineenvironmental consequences of con- degradation. flictualpolitics but have paid scant attention to Focusingon cooperationand its culturaland environ- landscapeimplications of cooperation,especially when mentalconsequences, this articleexpands upon the forms that cooperationis adoptedby a groupthat is seen as of politics in political ecological studies, notably the politicallyless powerful. This article examines cooperative commonly accepted frameworkthat privilegesconflicts politicsand its consequences for land use, culture, and the betweengroups and resistance of the weak.In refusingthe environmentin Uxin Ju, a Mongolianpastoral area assertionthat Mongols are either resistorsor victims in situatedin InnerMongolia Autonomous Region, China. managingtheir own landscape,this article promotesan Although,historically, the Mongols'relationship with the alternativetheorization, that of cooperationinitiated by Chinesehas often been conflictual,since the 1980s, the Mongols, that helps explain the most fundamental Mongolshave actively participated in the Chinesestate's changes in the landscape and related aspects of the projectof economicmodernization and have utilized their Mongolianculture. While steeringaway from resistance as accessto Chinesetechnology and laborers effectively in a particularform of environmentalpolitics, this article orderto expandtheir own economy. Mongols' cooperative builds upon the basic premiseof resistancescholarship: relationshipwith the Chinesestate and the HanChinese the active powerof human agency.I contend that when peoplehas precipitatedsignificant changes in land use, accordeda certaindegree of freedom,the groupdeemed culturalidentity, and the environmentin Uxin Ju. For less powerful,in this case the Mongols, not only may example,not only have intensiveland-use practices of cooperatewith the seeminglypowerful, in this case the enclosure,planting, and irrigationincreased on the Chinese people and state, but also can use such coopera- landscape,but culturalsignificance of landuse has also tion to empoweritself both culturallyand economically. become diluted. Environmentally,both improvement Such an empowerment,however, does not necessarily anddegradation have resulted, displaying a more compli- bringabout long-term environmental sustainability, as the Annalsof theAssociation of AmericanGeographers, 94(1), 2004, pp. 117-139 C2004 by Association of American Geographers Initial submission,January 2001; revised submission,January 2003; final acceptance, May 2003. Publishedby BlackwellPublishing, 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148, and 9600 GarsingtonRoad, Oxford OX4 2DQ, U.K. This content downloaded from 80.188.25.114 on Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:40:22 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 118 Jiang experience in Uxin Ju demonstrates. This lack of has shown that local people have resisted changes im- correspondencebetween forms of politics and environ- posed by the government and developmentalagencies mental outcomes speaks to the complexityof regional throughstrengthening their indigenousinstitutions and human-environmentalrealities. This article calls for a practices (Richards1985; Howitt, Connell, and Hirsch seriousconsideration of cooperativepolitics and its en- 1996). vironmentalconsequences. The excellence and importance of these research To situate this study,I begin by addressingtheoretical projectshave been taken to fosterthe understandingthat issues about the relationshipamong cooperation,power, resistanceis a trademarkof criticalscholarship, a sign of and the environment.This is followedby a discussionof takingpolitics seriously. But as Bebbington(2000) warns, field researchmethods that are employedin this study. privilegingresistance runs the risk of detaching politics These theoretical and methodologicalissues are then fromlivelihood practices. The diversityand specificityof interwovenin the foursections that structuremy discus- differentlocalities and local culturescan lead to a wide sion of cultural-environmentaltransformations in Uxin array of local responses, including resistance (Peluso Ju. The first section introduces the case study area, 1992), assimilation,and cooperation(Bebbington 2000). focusing on the history of the Mongolian-Chinese Localagencies have the capacityeither to enhanceor alter relationshipand land use before 1978. A briefdiscussion structuralforces (Giddens 1984), thus creating diverse of Chinese immigrationis included.The second section social and environmentaloutcomes. Local people may examines interactions between the Mongols and the indeed cooperatewith the state and othergroups in order Chinese,in particular,how the state has helped structure to achievetheir own goalsand gain theirown power.Such the interactions,and how the interactionshave occurred cooperationcan become, at times, the primaryfeature of aroundland use. This is followedby a third section that group-group and local-state relationships.Privileging examinesthe consequencesof Mongolian-Chineseinter- resistanceruns other risks, too. It may, however unin- actions for land-use and cultural change. The fourth tentionally,help to essentializelocal cultures and thus sectionexamines the environmentalconsequences of land- undermine the importance of cultural change, which use and culturalchange throughthe analysesof remote- oftenblurs the distinctionbetween the indigenousand the sensingimages and ecological processes. In the conclusion, outside.Not onlycan localpeople direct external forces to I summarizekey findingsof this study and reflecton the their own advantageand "buildmodernity from below" politics of cooperationand its implicationfor political- (Bebbington 2000), local cultures also change when ecologicalstudy. interactingwith externalforces, exhibiting what is seen as cooperation.Globalization has madesuch cultural change commonplace.Uxin Ju, like other pastoralsocieties, has Introduction long been influenced by the outside world (Khazanov 1994), and interaction with the Chinese has long ago Cooperation, Power, and the Environment made it into a place of "mixedlife" (Lattimore1940). Thus, Uxin Ju'scontinuing transformation under external Many scholars maintain