DOCSLIB.ORG

Using Rushes and Sedges in Revegetation of Wetland Areas in the South West of Wa

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using Rushes and Sedges in Revegetation of Wetland Areas in the South West of Wa Using rushes and sedges in revegetation of wetland areas in the south west of WA February 2001 WATER AND RIVERS Report No. RR 8 river restoration COMMISSION WATER & RIVERS COMMISSION Hyatt Centre 3 Plain Street East Perth Western Australia 6004 Telephone (08) 9278 0300 Facsimile (08) 9278 0301 We welcome your feedback A publication feedback form can be found at the back of this publication, or online at http://www.wrc.wa.gov.au/public/feedback USING RUSHES AND SEDGES IN REVEGETATION OF WETLAND AREAS IN THE SOUTH WEST OF WA Prepared by Linda Taman Jointly funded by WATER AND RIVERS COMMISSION WATER & RIVERS COMMISSION REPORT NO. RR 8 FEBRUARY 2001 Water and Rivers Commission Waterways WA Program. Managing and enhancing our waterways for the future Acknowledgments This document was prepared by Linda Taman. This document has been jointly funded by the Natural Heritage Trust and the Water and Rivers Commission. Illustrations by Ian Dickinson. Reviewed by Dr Jenny Davis, Murdoch University, Dr River Restoration series co-ordinated by Heidi Bucktin Peter Davies, University of Western Australia and Dr and Virginia Shotter, Water and Rivers Commission. Luke Pen, Water and Rivers Commission. Reference Details The recommended reference for this publication is: Water and Rivers Commission 2000, Using rushes and sedges in revegtation of wetland areas in the south west of WA, Water and Rivers Commission, River Restoration Report No. RR 8 ISBN 1-9-209-4708-6 [PDF] ISSN 1449-5147 [PDF] Text printed on recycled stock, February 2001 i Water and Rivers Commission Waterways WA Program. Managing and enhancing our waterways for the future Foreword Many Western Australian rivers are becoming degraded The Water and Rivers Commission is the lead agency for as a result of human activity within and along waterways the Waterways WA Program, which is aimed at the and through the off-site effects of catchment land uses. protection and enhancement of Western Australia’s The erosion of foreshores and invasion of weeds and waterways through support for on-ground action. One of feral animals are some of the more pressing problems. these support functions is the development of river Water quality in our rivers is declining with many restoration literature that will assist Local Government, carrying excessive loads of nutrients and sediment and community groups and landholders to restore, protect in some cases contaminated with synthetic chemicals and manage waterways. and other pollutants. Many rivers in the south-west This document is part of an ongoing series of river region are also becoming increasingly saline. restoration literature aimed at providing a guide to the The Water and Rivers Commission is responsible for nature, rehabilitation and long-term management of coordinating the management of the State’s waterways. waterways in Western Australia. It is intended that the Given that Western Australia has some 208 major rivers series will undergo continuous development and review. with a combined length of over 25 000 km, management As part of this process any feedback on the series is can only be achieved through the development of welcomed and may be directed to the Catchment and partnerships between business, landowners, community Waterways Management Branch of the Water and Rivers groups, local governments and the Western Australian Commission. and Commonwealth Governments. ii Water and Rivers Commission Waterways WA Program. Managing and enhancing our waterways for the future Using rushes and sedges in revegetation of wetland areas of the south west of WA Introducing rushes and sedges Botanically, rushes are members of the Juncaceae family, while sedges are members of the Cyperaceae While many people are familiar with the trees, shrubs family. Unfortunately the common names are very and herbaceous plants of their area, few are familiar with confusing, with many members of the Cyperaceae the rushes and sedges. Many of the species look similar commonly called rushes. The Typhaceae family is a to the untrained eye, and are easily confused with weed small family but extremely common, and these plants species. are often called Bulrushes. This manual section will deal with the common rushes, sedges and bulrushes of the Rushes and sedges form an extremely important south west of Western Australia, and their use in component of wetlands, rivers and estuaries of the wetland, river and estuary restoration. There are few coastal areas of the south west. They provide food and reference books available to assist with identification of habitat for a wide range of aquatic species, assist with these species. However there are two publications by the aeration of the sediments and filter and bind pollutants, Water and Rivers Commission and Department of particularly nutrients, that enter the ecosystem. In Conservation and Land Management in Perth, Native addition they are often found at the land-water interface, Vegetation of Freshwater Rivers and Creeks in South and play an important role in stabilizing the banks. The Western Australia (1997), and Native Vegetation of root mass binds the soil, while the many stems reduce Estuaries and Saline Waterways in South Western the impact of wave action or fast-flows at the water’s Australia (1997), and a book produced in New South edge. Wales by Geoff Sainty et al (1994) (Waterplants in Rushes and sedges reproduce by seed, but many species Australia: A Field Guide) which are quite useful. set little viable seed and extend their range by forming The other similar family of sedge-like plants is the large clonal colonies through underground spread of Restionaceae, or Southern Rushes, many of which are rhizomes. Some species produce a high percentage of dryland plants. This large and diverse group are not viable seed, but the seed has a complicated dormancy described in this section, but a new publication by pattern which may require many years of weathering to Meney and Pate (1999), Australian Rushes, will assist in break. Fortunately many of the species which are identifying these species. difficult to grow from seed are readily propagated from tissue culture or division of rhizomes. Tissue culture Wetland zones involves the extraction of embryos from viable seed and the production of seedlings grown in sterile media Rushes and sedges have specific hydrological within the laboratory. requirements. The areas in which they will grow are determined largely by the minimum and maximum water Many of the rushes and sedges spend much of their life levels. Very few of these plants are adapted to a static with their roots submerged, and in order to survive, have water level, as the wetlands, rivers and estuaries of the developed air-filled cells within their root systems, southwest of Western Australia generally have a large called aerenchyma. This allows the plants to draw fluctuation in water level from winter to summer. oxygen down into their rhizomes, from where it may Although stream and river systems vary considerably, diffuse into the sediments. Many microbial organisms the following hydrological zones for rushes, sedges and which break down organic matter depend on well other aquatic plants can be defined along most oxygenated sediments to survive. Thus many rushes and watercourses. sedges promote removal of nutrients from waterbodies through the creation of habitat for suitable bacteria and fungi, as well as by the nutrients they take up in order to grow. iii Water and Rivers Commission Waterways WA Program. Managing and enhancing our waterways for the future • Submergent zone edges. It is also the most important area for erosion control, as this is the area in which most erosion This zone has surface water for a good proportion of occurs, and also the most important for nutrient and the year. Submergent plants grow beneath the water sediment removal. surface, although their leaves may float on the surface, • Damp zone and the flowering spikes may extend above the water. Many submergent species may live comfortably as The damp zone, as its name suggests, is permanently terrestrial plants as the water drops, or may become damp or damp near the surface for most of the year, dormant until water levels rise again. There are a without having standing water, except for flood range of plant families which live as submergents, but events. Almost all of the rushes and sedges can live they do not include any of the rushes and sedges. The happily in this zone. The damp zone often extends for plants in this zone provide aquatic habitat, stabilise the a large distance across the floodplain. It is very stream bed, slow water flow, assist in nutrient removal important as a filtering zone for surface runoff and help to cool the water surface by shading. entering the system, as sediment and debris settle out while water passes through this zone. In flood events • Emergent zone the dense vegetation prevents erosion, and provides habitat for a wide range of fauna, particularly birdlife. The emergent zone supports plants which have their roots submerged beneath the water for at least some of • Ephemeral zone the year, but extend their leaves and stems above the water surface. This area can range from 1m deep in This zone is quite dry for much of the year, and may winter to damp in the driest part of summer. Many only become wet in flood events. It is the interface species from the Cyperaceae and Typhaceae families between the bushland and the riparian zone. There are live in this zone, as well as one species from the a few hardy species of rush and sedge which will live Juncaeae. in this zone, members of the Cyperaceae and Juncaceae families. This zone is extremely important for many fauna species, providing shelter and food along the shallow Exceptional flood level Typical high water level Ephemeral zone Damp zone Typical low water level Emergent zone-upper Emergent zone- lower Submergent zone Figure 1: Wetland zones and typical distribution of some sedge and rush species.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Common Name Scientific Name Description of Plant Picture of Plant
    Plant common name Description of Plant Picture of Plant Scientific name Strangler Fig The Strangler Fig begins life as a small vine-like plant Ficus thonningii that climbs the nearest large tree and then thickens, produces a branching set of buttressing aerial roots, and strangles its host tree. An easy way to tell the difference between Strangle Figs and other common figs is that the bottom half of the Strangler is gnarled and twisted where it used to be attached to its host, the upper half smooth. A common tree on kopjes and along rivers in Serengeti; two massive Fig trees near Serengeti; the "Tree Where Man was Born" in southern Loliondo, and the "Ancestor Tree" near Endulin, in Ngorongoro are significant for the local Maasai peoples. Wild Date Palm Palms are monocotyledons, the veins in their leaves Phoenix reclinata are parallel and unbranched, and are thus relatives of grasses, lilies, bananas and orchids. The wild Date Palm is the most common of the native palm trees, occurring along rivers and in swamps. The fruits are edible, though horrible tasting, while the thick, sugary sap is made into Palm wine. The tree offers a pleasant, softly rustling, fragrant-smelling shade; the sort of shade you will need to rest in if you try the wine. Candelabra The Candelabra tree is a common tree in the western Euphorbia and Northern parts of Serengeti. Like all Euphorbias, Euphorbia the Candelabra breaks easily and is full of white, candelabrum extremely toxic latex. One drop of this latex can blind or burn the skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 February 2009
    Swan and Helena Rivers Management Framework Heritage Audit and Statement of Significance • FINAL REPORT • 26 FEbRuARy 2009 REPORT CONTRIBUTORS: Alan Briggs Robin Chinnery Laura Colman Dr David Dolan Dr Sue Graham-Taylor A COLLABORATIVE PROJECT BY: Jenni Howlett Cheryl-Anne McCann LATITUDE CREATIVE SERVICES Brooke Mandy HERITAGE AND CONSERVATION PROFESSIONALS Gina Pickering (Project Manager) NATIONAL TRUST (WA) Rosemary Rosario Alison Storey Prepared FOR ThE EAsTERN Metropolitan REgIONAL COuNCIL ON bEhALF OF Dr Richard Walley OAM Cover image: View upstream, near Barker’s Bridge. Acknowledgements The consultants acknowledge the assistance received from the Councillors, staff and residents of the Town of Bassendean, Cities of Bayswater, Belmont and Swan and the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Council (EMRC), including Ruth Andrew, Dean Cracknell, Sally De La Cruz, Daniel Hanley, Brian Reed and Rachel Thorp; Bassendean, Bayswater, Belmont and Maylands Historical Societies, Ascot Kayak Club, Claughton Reserve Friends Group, Ellis House, Foreshore Environment Action Group, Friends of Ascot Waters and Ascot Island, Friends of Gobba Lake, Maylands Ratepayers and Residents Association, Maylands Yacht Club, Success Hill Action Group, Urban Bushland Council, Viveash Community Group, Swan Chamber of Commerce, Midland Brick and the other community members who participated in the heritage audit community consultation. Special thanks also to Anne Brake, Albert Corunna, Frances Humphries, Leoni Humphries, Oswald Humphries, Christine Lewis, Barry McGuire, May McGuire, Stephen Newby, Fred Pickett, Beverley Rebbeck, Irene Stainton, Luke Toomey, Richard Offen, Tom Perrigo and Shelley Withers for their support in this project. The views expressed in this document are the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the EMRC.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin / New York State Museum
    Juncaceae (Rush Family) of New York State Steven E. Clemants New York Natural Heritage Program LIBRARY JUL 2 3 1990 NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN Contributions to a Flora of New York State VII Richard S. Mitchell, Editor Bulletin No. 475 New York State Museum The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Albany, New York 12230 NEW YORK THE STATE OF LEARNING Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from IMLS LG-70-15-0138-15 https://archive.org/details/bulletinnewyorks4751 newy Juncaceae (Rush Family) of New York State Steven E. Clemants New York Natural Heritage Program Contributions to a Flora of New York State VII Richard S. Mitchell, Editor 1990 Bulletin No. 475 New York State Museum The University of the State of New York THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Albany, New York 12230 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of The University Martin C. Barell, Chancellor, B.A., I. A., LL.B Muttontown R. Carlos Carballada, Vice Chancellor , B.S Rochester Willard A. Genrich, LL.B Buffalo Emlyn 1. Griffith, A. B., J.D Rome Jorge L. Batista, B. A., J.D Bronx Laura Bradley Chodos, B.A., M.A Vischer Ferry Louise P. Matteoni, B.A., M.A., Ph.D Bayside J. Edward Meyer, B.A., LL.B Chappaqua Floyd S. Linton, A.B., M.A., M.P.A Miller Place Mimi Levin Lieber, B.A., M.A Manhattan Shirley C. Brown, B.A., M.A., Ph.D Albany Norma Gluck, B.A., M.S.W Manhattan James W.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cape Town | Table Bay Nature Reserve | Quarterly Report | January to March 2014 1
    This quarterly report summarises the activities of the Biodiversity Management Branch at the Table Bay Nature Reserve for the period from 1 January to 31 March 2014. CONTENTS PAGE 1 AREA MANAGER’S SECTION 2 2 HIGHLIGHTS AND CHALLENGES 3 3 BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT 4 4 NATURE CONSERVATION 6 5 WATER MANAGEMENT 8 6 FIRE MANAGEMENT 9 7 COMPLIANCE MANAGEMENT 9 8 PEOPLE AND CONSERVATION 10 9 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 13 10 VISITORS AND INCOME 14 11 INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT 16 12 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 16 Appendix A: Press articles 17 Appendix B: Species lists 22 Figure 1. BirdLife SA's Important Bird Area (IBA) sign near the Rietvlei Education Centre. City of Cape Town | Table Bay Nature Reserve | Quarterly Report | January to March 2014 1 1 AREA MANAGER’S SECTION 1.1 Typha capensis (bulrush) reeds Numerous communications have been received from neighbours around the Table Bay Nature Reserve about Typha capensis (bulrush) reeds and the seeds that they release during February and March. From the 1950s to 1980s there were several drastic alterations to the hydrology of the wetlands in the Table Bay area, including major excavations and dredging, construction of major roads and railways, and the development of residential and industrial areas. Today these developments and roads act as drainage impoundments. Surface storm-water runoff and treated wastewater effluent is directed into the natural areas. This is changing the dynamic seasonal and temporary wetlands into more static nutrient-enriched permanent water areas. As a result of this urbanisation, elevated water and nutrient levels are more likely to persist throughout the Rietvlei wetland system.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Spikerush Eleocharis Acuta
    Eleocharis acuta CYPERACEAE Common spikerush Inflorescence Avon Catchment Council Eleocharis acuta Common spikerush Plant features Growth form Perennial, spreading sedge, up to 0.7m high, with slender creeping rhizomes from which new stems arise. It often forms extensive colonies across shallow waterbodies. CYPERACEAE Leaves The stems are light to medium green, 1-3mm wide, circular in cross section and up to 0.7m in length. The leaves are reduced to one or more purplish sheaths around the base, with the upmost leaf having a needle-like blade. Flowers The inflorescence is at the top of stems and is a single spikelet 10-30mm long and 3-7mm wide, making the stem and inflorescence look somewhat like a spear. The spikelet contains several small flowers. Flowers brown and occur from Sep-Dec. Fruits The nut is smooth, brown, slightly compressed and 1mm wide by 1.5-2mm long. Distribution An common wetland species from Carnarvon to east of Esperance and Floodfringe Kalgoorlie with scattered populations Floodway in the Avon catchment. Occurs in all Normal winter level other states. Prefered habitat of Eleocharis acuta Zone, habitat Occurs in fresh, seasonally waterlogged waterways including creek banks, swamps, floodways, seeps, clay pans and lake edges. Found in most soil types. Additional information It is an excellent soil stabiliser and nutrient stripper for winter wet waterbodies due to its network of roots and dense foliage at the soil surface. It often forms dense colonies around waterbodies and can be the dominant species. Tolerates a wide range of water levels. Also has the ability to pump oxygen into the sediment, which assists with essential microbial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature Conservation
    J. Nat. Conserv. 11, – (2003) Journal for © Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/jnc Nature Conservation Constructing Red Numbers for setting conservation priorities of endangered plant species: Israeli flora as a test case Yuval Sapir1*, Avi Shmida1 & Ori Fragman1,2 1 Rotem – Israel Plant Information Center, Dept. of Evolution, Systematics and Ecology,The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Present address: Botanical Garden,The Hebrew University, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel Abstract A common problem in conservation policy is to define the priority of a certain species to invest conservation efforts when resources are limited. We suggest a method of constructing red numbers for plant species, in order to set priorities in con- servation policy. The red number is an additive index, summarising values of four parameters: 1. Rarity – The number of sites (1 km2) where the species is present. A rare species is defined when present in 0.5% of the area or less. 2. Declining rate and habitat vulnerability – Evaluate the decreasing rate in the number of sites and/or the destruction probability of the habitat. 3. Attractivity – the flower size and the probability of cutting or exploitation of the plant. 4. Distribution type – scoring endemic species and peripheral populations. The plant species of Israel were scored for the parameters of the red number. Three hundred and seventy (370) species, 16.15% of the Israeli flora entered into the “Red List” received red numbers above 6. “Post Mortem” analysis for the 34 extinct species of Israel revealed an average red number of 8.7, significantly higher than the average of the current red list.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Rushes: Juncus Factsheets
    New Zealand Rushes: Juncus factsheets K. Bodmin, P. Champion, T. James and T. Burton www.niwa.co.nz Acknowledgements: Our thanks to all those who contributed photographs, images or assisted in the formulation of the factsheets, particularly Aarti Wadhwa (graphics) at NIWA. This project was funded by TFBIS, the Terrestrial and Freshwater Biodiversity information System (TFBIS) Programme. TFBIS is funded by the Government to help New Zealand achieve the goals of the New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy and is administered by the Department of Conservation (DOC). All photographs are by Trevor James (AgResearch), Kerry A. Bodmin or Paul D. Rushes: Champion (NIWA) unless otherwise stated. Additional images and photographs were kindly provided by Allan Herbarium; Auckland Herbarium; Larry Allain (USGS, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center); Forest and Kim Starr; Donald Cameron (Go Botany Juncus website); and Tasmanian Herbarium (Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania). factsheets © 2015 - NIWA. All rights Reserved. Cite as: Bodmin KA, Champion PD, James T & Burton T (2015) New Zealand Rushes: Juncus factsheets. NIWA, Hamilton. Introduction Rushes (family Juncaceae) are a common component of New Zealand wetland vegetation and species within this family appear very similar. With over 50 species, Juncus are the largest component of the New Zealand rushes and are notoriously difficult for amateurs and professionals alike to identify to species level. This key and accompanying factsheets have been developed to enable users with a diverse range of botanical expertise to identify Juncus to species level. The best time for collection, survey or identification is usually from December to April as mature fruiting material is required to distinguish between species.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenotypic Landscape Inference Reveals Multiple Evolutionary Paths to C4 Photosynthesis
    RESEARCH ARTICLE elife.elifesciences.org Phenotypic landscape inference reveals multiple evolutionary paths to C4 photosynthesis Ben P Williams1†, Iain G Johnston2†, Sarah Covshoff1, Julian M Hibberd1* 1Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom Abstract C4 photosynthesis has independently evolved from the ancestral C3 pathway in at least 60 plant lineages, but, as with other complex traits, how it evolved is unclear. Here we show that the polyphyletic appearance of C4 photosynthesis is associated with diverse and flexible evolutionary paths that group into four major trajectories. We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 lineages containing species that use C3, C4, or intermediate C3–C4 forms of photosynthesis to parameterise a 16-dimensional phenotypic landscape. We then developed and experimentally verified a novel Bayesian approach based on a hidden Markov model that predicts how the C4 phenotype evolved. The alternative evolutionary histories underlying the appearance of C4 photosynthesis were determined by ancestral lineage and initial phenotypic alterations unrelated to photosynthesis. We conclude that the order of C4 trait acquisition is flexible and driven by non-photosynthetic drivers. This flexibility will have facilitated the convergent evolution of this complex trait. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00961.001 Introduction *For correspondence: Julian. The convergent evolution of complex traits is surprisingly common, with examples including camera- [email protected] like eyes of cephalopods, vertebrates, and cnidaria (Kozmik et al., 2008), mimicry in invertebrates and †These authors contributed vertebrates (Santos et al., 2003; Wilson et al., 2012) and the different photosynthetic machineries of equally to this work plants (Sage et al., 2011a).
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-2016
    Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-2016 J.S. Gillen June 2017 Report to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University, Canberra Disclaimer The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of use of the information contained herein as to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board and its employees expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. © South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board 2017 This report may be cited as: Gillen, J.S. Vegetation and soil assessment of selected waterholes of the Diamantina and Warburton Rivers, South Australia, 2014-16. Report by Australian National University to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, Pt Augusta. Cover images: Warburton River April 2015; Cowarie Crossing Warburton River May 2016 Copies of the report can be obtained from: Natural Resources Centre, Port Augusta T: +61 (8) 8648 5300 E: [email protected] Vegetation and Soil Assessment 2 Contents 1 Study Aims and Funding Context 6 2 Study Region Characteristics 7 2.1 Location 7 2.2 Climate 7 3 The Diamantina: dryland river in an arid environment 10 3.1 Methodology 11 3.2 Stages 12
    [Show full text]
  • Low Flammability Local Native Species (Complete List)
    Indicative List of Low Flammability Plants – All local native species – Shire of Serpentine Jarrahdale – May 2010 Low flammability local native species (complete list) Location key – preferred soil types for local native species Location Soil type Comments P Pinjarra Plain Beermullah, Guildford and Serpentine River soils Alluvial soils, fertile clays and loams; usually flat deposits carried down from the scarp Natural vegetation is typical of wetlands, with sheoaks and paperbarks, or marri and flooded gum woodlands, or shrublands, herblands or sedgelands B Bassendean Dunes Bassendean sands, Southern River and Bassendean swamps Pale grey-yellow sand, infertile, often acidic, lacking in organic matter Natural vegetation is banksia woodland with woollybush, or woodlands of paperbarks, flooded gum, marri and banksia in swamps F Foothills Forrestfield soils (Ridge Hill Shelf) Sand and gravel Natural vegetation is woodland of jarrah and marri on gravel, with banksias, sheoaks and woody pear on sand S Darling Scarp Clay-gravels, compacted hard in summer, moist in winter, prone to erosion on steep slopes Natural vegetation on shallow soils is shrublands, on deeper soils is woodland of jarrah, marri, wandoo and flooded gum D Darling Plateau Clay-gravels, compacted hard in summer, moist in winter Natural vegetation on laterite (gravel) is woodland or forest of jarrah and marri with banksia and snottygobble, on granite outcrops is woodland, shrubland or herbs, in valleys is forests of jarrah, marri, yarri and flooded gum with banksia Flammability
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by the Cape to Cape Catchments Group in Partnership With
    Prepared by the Cape to Cape Catchments Group in partnership with ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Cape to Cape Landcare Companion has been compiled from a range of existing sources of information in the local area. Many local members of the community have contributed to its production and the Cape to Cape Catchments Group would like to thank them all. Thanks are also due to members of the Cape to Cape Catchments working group for this project who provided review and project management of the production of this manual. This working group included the following people: Kirrily White Merryn Delaney Margaret Moir Rod Whittle Genevieve Hanran-Smith Tracey Gregory Kay Lehman Sasha Taylor Paul Downes Lorraine Firth Shelley Ray-Brennan Robyn Paice Wayne O’Sullivan Sally Scott John Moore from the Department of Agriculture provided all of the specific weed control advice and photographs of weeds. This material was all taken from John's book Southern Weeds and their Control. The Department of Conservation and Land Management and the Land for Wildlife Program provided information about important fauna species of the local area and the threats faced by these species. The Dieback Working Group provided the basis for much of the material written about dieback and its management. Margaret Moir prepared the list of native flora species suitable for revegetation in the Cape to Cape subregion. The Water and Rivers Commission provided the catchment maps presented in the manual. Thanks are extended to GeoCatch for their assistance and technical support. The Natural Heritage Trust, the Shire of Augusta Margaret River and Greening Australia all contributed to the funding of this manual and provided support throughout the production process.
    [Show full text]