Reptiles and Amphibians As Targets for Nature Management
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Preface Reptiles and amphibians as targets for nature management 1 Reptiles and amphibians as targets for nature management MISSION: Alterra is the main centre of expertise on rural areas and water management in the Netherlands. It was founded 1 January 2000. Alterra combines a huge range of expertise on rural areas and their sustainable use, including aspects such as water, wildlife, forests, the environment, soils, landscape, climate and recreation, as well as various other aspects relevant to the development and management of the environment we live in. Alterra engages in strategic and applied research to support design processes, policymaking and management at the local, national and international level. This includes not only innovative, interdisciplinary research on complex problems relating to rural areas, but also the production of readily applicable knowledge and expertise enabling rapid and adequate solutions to practical problems. The many themes of Alterra's research effort include relations between cities and their surrounding countryside, multiple use of rural areas, economy and ecology, integrated water management, sustainable agricultural systems, planning for the future, expert systems and modelling, biodiversity, landscape planning and landscape perception, integrated forest management, geo-information and remote sensing, spatial planning of leisure activities, habitat creation in marine and estuarine waters, green belt development and ecological webs, and pollution risk assessment. Alterra is part of Wageningen University Research Centre (Wageningen UR) and includes two research sites, one in Wageningen and one on the island of Texel. 2 Preface Reptiles and amphibians as targets for nature management A.H.P. Stumpel ALTERRA SCIEN TIFIC CONTRIBU TIONS 13 ALTERRA GREEN WORLD RESEARCH, WAGENINGEN 2004 3 Reptiles and amphibians as targets for nature management Cover: Sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) ISBN 90-3270339-0 4 Contents Preface 7 1 Introduction 6 2 Biometrical and ecological data from a Netherlands population of Anguis fragilis (Reptilia, Sauria, Anguidae) A.H.P. STUMPEL Published in Amphibia-Reptilia 6: 181-194 (1985) 6 3 Habitat selection and management of the Sand lizard, Lacerta agilis L., at the Utrechtse Heuvelrug, Central Netherlands A.H.P. STUMPEL Published in Mertensiella 1: 122-131 (1988) 6 4 Distribution and present numbers of the tree frog Hyla arborea in Zealand Flanders, the Netherlands (Amphibia, Hylidae) A.H.P. STUMPEL Published in Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 57(2): 151-163 (1987) 6 5 Characterizing the suitability of new ponds for amphibians A.H.P. STUMPEL & H. VAN DER VOET Published in Amphibia-Reptilia 19: 125-142 (1988) 6 6 Intraspecific variation in two life history traits in frog larvae (Rana temporaria) from five populations along a north-south gradient A.H.P. STUMPEL & H. SIEPEL Unpublished paper 6 7 Habitat management in practice 6 7.1 Reptiles 110 7.2 Amphibians 143 7.3 References 189 Summary 207 Samenvatting 209 5 Reptiles and amphibians as targets for nature management 6 Preface Preface This thesis presents what I consider to be effective measures for the sustainable survival of reptiles and amphibians in the Netherlands. In spite of being legally protected since 1973, our herpetofauna is still on the decline. I feel I have a right to speak on these matters. My career as a herpetologist started about this time, and although I have seen how much has been achieved, I have also seen how much has been lost. The deep concern I feel in the face of this loss, and about the part in it played by present conservation practice in the Netherlands, has led me to write the present work. Habitat management is common practice in nature management in the Netherlands and many good things are being achieved in the field. However, despite the hard work of the managers, there are too many targets that are not met. Such experiences are frustrating for everybody involved in nature conservation. I have investigated why the results are not good enough. My aim is to improve the success rate of faunal nature management with this contribution; as a herpetologist, I feel I have a recipe for doing better, and, furthermore, one that also take the interests of other animals into account. Reptiles and amphibians have fascinated me since my childhood in the late fifties. I was ten years old when my father took me to the outskirts of the town to collect frogspawn. In those days, these animals were still easy to find. Many hours were spent watching the development of the eggs in a preserving jar on a coal-box in the garden. Curious, I went back to the ditch where we had found the eggs, and this time discovered fish-like creatures disturbing the water surface: newts, as I later learned. I succeeded in collecting some with a homemade fishing net and put my new trophies in another jar; many others would follow. It was a great surprise to learn that nobody in our part of the world had ever seen such animals before, let alone that there was any information available on their life history. Then shortly afterwards, we visited a cousin who kept a lizard in a small terrarium, and my enthusiasm grew even more when I saw this scaly animal alternating agile with motionless behaviour. From that moment on, I realised I had to know more about such animals, and that I wanted to become a biologist. My wish became true. I graduated in biology with amphibian ecology as my main subject; Hein Oomen was my teacher. I found a job at a research institute for nature conservation, the RIN (Rijksinstituut voor Natuurbeheer), where I took part in a project for mapping the vegetation of the Netherlands, at the same time evaluating the quality of the 7 Reptiles and amphibians as targets for nature management landscape for nature (KALKHOVEN ET AL., 1976; STUMPEL & KALKHOVEN, 1978). These environmental maps were the start of a holistic consideration of nature, developed in particular by Eddy van der Maarel (VAN DER MAAREL & STUMPEL, 1974). While doing this work, I was already forming my ideas on appropriate conservation measures for reptiles and amphibians. Moreover, I was also actively involved in research on grass snakes, sand lizards and slow-worms, looking at their ecology with special attention to their habitats. There was little known about the ecology of either group, although the Animal Ecology Department at the Catholic University of Nijmegen was carrying out ecological research on reptiles and amphibians at that time. A chance discovery of a large population of tree frogs in the southwest of the country meant that my attention was brought to the state of amphibian habitats. I carried out ecological research that included detailed habitat analysis. Soon, it was obvious to me that reptiles and amphibians attracted far less interest than birds and mammals, and that there was little or no support for their conservation. However, there were positive developments on the European front. The first international herpetological symposium was organised (COBORN, 1981), and there in Oxford, I met others like myself, concerned about the fate of these fascinating animals. This would be the start of an intensive co-operation with the prominent British herpetologist Keith Corbett and others throughout Europe. Up to that point, I had only been able to share my enthusiasm with one colleague at the RIN, namely Bert Hanekamp, with whom I would do so much useful work on habitat management in the nineteen eighties. At that conference in 1980, I presented a provisional list of species that I considered to be at risk (STUMPEL, 1981). The situation was already serious. Since then, I have been at the forefront of herpetological conservation, both at European and national level. In 1981, I was one of the initiators of the Conservation Committee (and would become its chairman in 2003) of Societas Europaea Herpetologica (SEH), the European herpetological society; the society had been founded in 1979. At the beginning of the eighties, the RIN was concerned with the practical aspects of nature conservation. In 1983, a position of herpetologist was created at the institute, and I was thus given the opportunity to put all my energy into herpetology. The RIN was then part of Staatsbosbeheer (the State Forestry Service), an owner of nature reserves all over the country. My work entailed visiting reserves, monitoring the effect of measures and advising nature wardens on the appropriate vegetation management for developing structure suitable for the herpetofauna (cf., STUMPEL, 1985). It was a good and productive time because the wardens took the advice seriously. It was a pity that their supervisors gave them so little room for putting this advice into practice, in order to have a long-term effect. Later in the eighties, my advisory work was cut down; the government had decided 8 Preface to separate policy and management concerning nature conservation, and the institute chose the policy side. I was able to do little with what I saw happening: an increasing decline in our herpetofauna through mismanagement. However, outside my official work, I spent time in the field, keeping in touch with those carrying out nature management in practice. Also, by continuing my observations in nature reserves, I kept an eye on the quality of management of the habitats. The applied research that I carried out later in the laboratory helped clarify problems that I came across in the field. I have always felt the wish to publish my experiences with the management of herpetofauna. However, when would the fruit be ripe enough? I now know this will hardly ever be the case, but the late summer of my career seems a good moment for presenting the state of affairs. I hope the information in this thesis will be used and contribute to a better conservation of reptiles and amphibians.