DOCSLIB.ORG

Maps and Co-Ordinates Appendix B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maps and Co-Ordinates Appendix B SECTION F: APPENDICES Appendix A: Maps and Co-ordinates Appendix B: Photographs Appendix C: Facility illustration(s) Appendix D: Public Participation Appendix E: Impact Assessment and Significance Methodology Appendix F: Details of EAP and expertise Appendix G: Declaration of Interest and EAP Affirmation Appendix A: Maps (Locality Map, Proposed Layout Map and Sensitivity Map) and co-ordinates APPENDIX A: POWER LINE CO-ORDINATES Komsberg East Grid Connection. Number Distance (m) Latitude Longitude 1 Start -32.739 20.995 2 250 -32.739 20.993 3 500 -32.739 20.990 4 750 -32.738 20.987 5 1000 -32.738 20.985 6 1250 -32.738 20.982 7 1500 -32.737 20.979 8 1750 -32.737 20.977 9 2000 -32.736 20.974 10 2250 -32.736 20.972 11 2500 -32.736 20.969 12 2750 -32.736 20.966 13 3000 -32.736 20.964 14 3250 -32.737 20.961 15 3500 -32.737 20.958 16 3750 -32.737 20.956 17 4000 -32.737 20.953 18 4250 -32.738 20.950 19 4500 -32.738 20.948 20 4750 -32.738 20.945 21 5000 -32.738 20.942 22 5155 -32.738 20.940 23 5405 -32.739 20.938 24 5655 -32.739 20.935 25 5905 -32.740 20.933 26 6155 -32.741 20.930 27 6405 -32.741 20.928 28 6655 -32.742 20.925 29 6905 -32.743 20.923 30 7155 -32.743 20.920 31 7405 -32.744 20.918 32 7655 -32.745 20.915 33 7905 -32.745 20.913 34 8155 -32.746 20.910 35 8405 -32.747 20.907 36 8655 -32.747 20.905 37 8905 -32.748 20.902 38 9155 -32.749 20.900 39 9405 -32.749 20.897 40 9655 -32.750 20.895 41 9905 -32.750 20.892 42 10155 -32.750 20.889 43 10405 -32.750 20.887 44 10655 -32.749 20.884 45 10905 -32.749 20.881 46 11155 -32.748 20.879 47 11405 -32.748 20.876 48 11655 -32.748 20.874 1 Number Distance (m) Latitude Longitude 49 11905 -32.748 20.871 50 12155 -32.750 20.869 51 12405 -32.751 20.867 52 12655 -32.752 20.864 53 12905 -32.751 20.862 54 13155 -32.751 20.859 55 13405 -32.752 20.857 56 13655 -32.753 20.854 57 13905 -32.754 20.852 58 14155 -32.755 20.849 59 14405 -32.756 20.847 60 14655 -32.757 20.845 61 14905 -32.758 20.842 62 15155 -32.759 20.840 63 15405 -32.760 20.838 64 15655 -32.762 20.836 65 15905 -32.763 20.834 66 16155 -32.765 20.833 67 16405 -32.767 20.832 68 16655 -32.769 20.831 69 16905 -32.771 20.830 70 17155 -32.772 20.828 71 17405 -32.773 20.825 72 17655 -32.774 20.822 73 17702 -32.774 20.820 74 17952 -32.774 20.819 75 18202 -32.775 20.817 76 18452 -32.775 20.814 77 18702 -32.775 20.812 78 18952 -32.776 20.809 79 19202 -32.776 20.806 80 19452 -32.777 20.804 81 19702 -32.777 20.801 82 19952 -32.778 20.798 83 20202 -32.778 20.796 84 20452 -32.778 20.793 85 20702 -32.779 20.791 86 20952 -32.779 20.788 87 21202 -32.779 20.785 88 21452 -32.780 20.783 89 21702 -32.780 20.780 90 21952 -32.780 20.777 91 22202 -32.780 20.775 92 22452 -32.781 20.772 93 22702 -32.781 20.769 94 22952 -32.781 20.767 95 23202 -32.781 20.764 96 23452 -32.782 20.762 97 23702 -32.784 20.760 98 23952 -32.785 20.758 99 24202 -32.787 20.756 2 Number Distance (m) Latitude Longitude 100 24452 -32.788 20.754 101 24702 -32.790 20.752 102 24952 -32.791 20.750 103 25202 -32.793 20.748 104 25452 -32.794 20.746 105 25702 -32.796 20.744 106 25952 -32.797 20.742 107 26202 -32.799 20.740 108 26452 -32.800 20.738 109 26702 -32.802 20.736 110 26952 -32.804 20.734 111 27202 -32.805 20.732 112 27452 -32.807 20.730 113 27702 -32.808 20.728 114 27952 -32.810 20.726 115 28202 -32.811 20.724 116 28452 -32.813 20.722 117 28702 -32.814 20.720 118 28952 -32.816 20.718 119 29202 -32.817 20.716 120 29452 -32.819 20.715 121 29702 -32.821 20.713 122 29952 -32.823 20.712 123 30202 -32.825 20.711 124 30452 -32.827 20.709 125 30702 -32.829 20.708 126 30952 -32.831 20.706 127 31202 -32.832 20.705 128 31452 -32.834 20.703 129 31702 -32.836 20.702 130 31952 -32.838 20.701 131 32202 -32.840 20.700 132 32452 -32.843 20.699 133 32702 -32.845 20.699 134 32952 -32.847 20.698 135 33202 -32.849 20.697 136 33452 -32.851 20.696 137 33702 -32.853 20.694 138 33952 -32.855 20.693 139 34202 -32.856 20.691 140 34452 -32.857 20.688 141 34702 -32.859 20.686 142 34952 -32.860 20.684 143 35202 -32.862 20.682 144 35452 -32.863 20.680 145 35702 -32.865 20.678 146 35952 -32.866 20.677 147 36202 -32.868 20.675 148 36452 -32.869 20.673 149 36702 -32.871 20.671 150 36952 -32.873 20.669 3 Number Distance (m) Latitude Longitude 151 37202 -32.874 20.667 152 37452 -32.876 20.665 153 37702 -32.877 20.663 154 37952 -32.879 20.661 155 38202 -32.880 20.659 156 38452 -32.882 20.657 157 38702 -32.884 20.655 158 38952 -32.885 20.653 159 39202 -32.887 20.651 160 39452 -32.888 20.650 161 39702 -32.890 20.648 162 39952 -32.891 20.646 163 40202 -32.893 20.644 164 40452 -32.894 20.642 165 40702 -32.896 20.640 166 40952 -32.898 20.638 167 41202 -32.899 20.636 168 41452 -32.901 20.634 169 41702 -32.902 20.632 170 41952 -32.904 20.630 171 42202 -32.905 20.628 172 42452 -32.907 20.626 173 42702 -32.908 20.624 174 42952 -32.910 20.623 175 43202 -32.912 20.621 176 43452 -32.913 20.619 177 43702 -32.915 20.617 178 43952 -32.916 20.615 179 44202 -32.918 20.613 180 44452 -32.919 20.611 181 44702 -32.921 20.609 182 44952 -32.923 20.607 183 45202 -32.924 20.605 184 45452 -32.926 20.603 185 45702 -32.927 20.601 186 45952 -32.929 20.599 187 46202 -32.930 20.597 188 END -32.932 20.596 4 Appendix B: Site Photographs APPENDIX B: PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE SITE Figure 1: The site facing north (co-ordinates -32.729880° 20.929222°). Figure 2: The site facing east (co-ordinates -32.729880° 20.929222°) 1 Figure 3: The site facing south (co-ordinates -32.729880° 20.929222°). Figure 4: The site facing west (co-ordinates -32.729880° 20.929222°). 2 Figure 5: Panorama facing north (co-ordinates -32.729880° 20.929222°). Figure 6: Panorama facing south (co-ordinates -32.729880° 20.929222°). 3 Appendix C: Facility illustration(s) Appendix C: Facility Illustrations. Figure 1: 132kV DC lattice structure. Figure 2: 132kV DC monopoles. 1 Figure 3:132kV SC Flat Formation Strain. Figure 4: 132kV SC Lattice. 2 Figure 5: Typical IPP (Independent Power Producer) Substation. Figure 6: Typical Switching Station. 3 Appendix D: Public Participation Appendix D1 Advertisements and site notices Vrydag 28 Augustus 2015 Die Burger Geklassifiseerd 11 . A 9`cUS` !/$8 !1 $ .%$3- 6$)'3-$ 7#- )'3-$ ), !9*159*51*4 7\a]ZdS\bS P]SRSZ AB34/< 9@C53@ ;SSabS`adS`egaW\U( 1 % # B`ORW\U /Z^VO B`cab 9S\\Wa USaYWSR VWS`[SS ROb RWS !9*159*51*4 BeSSRS DS`UORS`W\U dO\ AYcZRSWaS`a 7\a]ZdS\bS P]SRSZ B@/27<5 /:>6/ !04 B@CAB ;SSabS`adS`egaW\Ua\` aOZ ^ZOOadW\R d]]` RWS D]]`aWbbS\RS 4 (9 , 0SO[^bS ;SSabS` dO\ RWS 6]]UUS 1&$ # 9S\\Wa USaYWSR VWS`[SS ROb RWS 9c`O `SUaV]T 9OO^abOR ]^ & AS^bS[PS` %5- %#.1-31%# ( 16) 1 . %% %#1- 13- #.1! 3- 1 '.1* # ][ '( dW` RWS d]ZUS\RS b]` aS 3S`abS :WYeWROaWS S\ 2Wab`WPc - -', aWS`SYS\W\U W\ RWS P]US\]S[RS aOOY R]SZSWS\RSa( %%- 3- .! 5%- # 1#--. 51 4%!%# # + --#1! 0Sega dO\ SWaS bS` W\aOS aOZ Z} W\ RWS 9O\b]]` dO\ RWS ;SSabS` dO\ RWS 6]]UUS`SUaV]T -%3-"#1 3!1%#. 27&&,* &7 2 1> ;$ 77 2 1 $; 7 1&# 1 271 -:" $ 2: 7"> D]]`ZSUUW\U dO\ RWS :WYeWRObSc` aS =)1 $ )1&22 &$" 21; )1&; 12 &1 7 2:))"> $ " ;1> & '@@ DS`aZOU 2cZZOV =[O` 5SP]c 9OabSSZab`OOb #--. "%1 4%!%# # 1 '.1 4-.. 4- .3 %#1- 13-. .%%. $ '4@@ #&7&1 ; "2 ( 7&$ $ ' 7&$ " 7 " ;1> ; "2 *!! 2+ $ =[ ]^R`OUbS OO\UOO\RS RWS OR[W "# 9OO^abOR a]eSZ Oa RWS YO\b]`S !6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SENTECH SOC LIMITED Corporate Plan 2015-2018
    SENTECH SOC LIMITED Corporate Plan 2015-2018 Presentation to the PPC on Telecommunications and Postal Services 14 April 2015 SENTECH SOC LTD Corporate 1 Plan 2015-2018 CORPORATE PLAN 1 FOREWORD 2 COMPANY PURPOSE 3 ALIGNMENT TO SHAREHOLDER PRIORITIES 4 PERFORMANCE REVIEW 5 MARKET OUTLOOK 6 BUSINESS STRATEGY: MTEF 2015 - 2018 7 STRATEGIC PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS 8 FINANCIAL PLAN 9 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS SENTECH SOC LTD Corporate Plan 2015-2018 2 FOREWORD • SENTECH hereby presents the Company’s Corporate Plan for the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) for 2015 – 2018 which was tabled to Parliament by the Honorable Minister of Telecommunications and Postal Services. • The Corporate Plan was also submitted to National Treasury as required in terms of Section 52 of the PFMA and Treasury Regulation 29. • As one of the primary enablers of Government interventions in the Information Communication and Technology (“ICT”) sector, SENTECH’s business strategy is informed by and aligned to the Shareholder’s Medium Term Strategy Focus (“MTSF”) objectives, the Strategic Goals of the Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services (“DTPS”) for the same period, as well as the Company’s internal objectives as adopted by the Board of Directors from time to time. • For this MTEF period, the Board is re-committing SENTECH to a singular business strategy theme: “To provide and operate communications network services that enable all broadcasting and content services to be accessible by all South Africans” SENTECH SOC LTD Corporate Plan 2015-2018 3 FOREWORD: SENTECH of the Future • In order to ensure that the Company employs the required focus into the execution of the expanded business strategy, the Company has resolved to operate along a business unit structure and specifically, through four (4) distinct business units that will separately manage Broadcasting Signal Distribution Services, Digital Media Services, Connectivity Services and Public Safety Services.
    [Show full text]
  • Notification of Basic Assessment Process and Public Participation Process
    NOTIFICATION OF BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS 17 August 2018 Dear Stakeholder BASIC ASSESSMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS ZONNEQUA WIND FARM, NORTHERN CAPE NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROCESS A wind farm is proposed to be developed within the Springbok Renewable Energy Development Zone (REDZ), approximately 19 km south-east of the town of Kleinsee in the Northern Cape. The wind farm is known as the Zonnequa Wind Farm and is located within the Nama Khoi Local Municipality and the Namakwa District Municipality. A suitable project site for the development of the wind farm has been identified by the project development company. The details of the project are as follows: Project Name Zonnequa Wind Farm Applicant Genesis Zonnequa Wind (Pty) Ltd Area of project site ~4434ha Affected properties » Portion 1 of the Farm Zonnekwa 328 » Remaining Extent of the Farm Zonnekwa 326 Contracted up to 140MW Capacity of wind farm No of turbines up to 56 Turbine hub height up to 130m Turbine tip height up to 205m Grid connection At the existing Gromis Substation, approx. 19km north of the site On-site substation 150m x 150m size Power line Overhead 132kV power line (assessed as a 300m power line corridor), with a servitude of 32m Affected properties - » Remaining extent of the Farm Zonnekwa 326 132kV grid » Remaining extent of the Farm Honde Vlei 325 connection » Remaining extent of the Farm Kannabieduin 324 » Remaining extent of the Farm Sand Kop 322 » Remaining extent of the Farm Mannels Vley 321 » Remaining
    [Show full text]
  • AFR 53/76/90 Distr: UA/SC UA 466/90 Fear
    EXTERNAL (for general distribution) AI Index: AFR 53/76/90 Distr: UA/SC UA 466/90 Fear of Torture/Legal Concern 16 November 1990 SOUTH AFRICA Jomo KHASU, aged about 30, senior Regional Organizer for the (Bophuthatswana): African National Congress (ANC), Northern Cape, detained 13 November 1990 and possibly as many as 150 others including: (Maluke (second name not known), from Mafikeng ( Mabitso PHETOANE, from Phokeng Detained on( Chris MOLEFE, from Thlabane 13 November ( Jane MAPUTSELA 1990( Botho MAHILA ( Laura TAYLOR, reportedly ill from suspected myeloencephalitis (M.E.) ( John LEHOBYE, from Mabopane ( Lazarus MKHWANAZE ( A M MAMASELA Detained on ( NYAMAKAZI (first name not known) 12 November ( Manku MALEBO, from Phokeng 1990( Lucy (second name not known) ( Elizabeth LETSWITI ( Maria DIPALE ( MAKELENELE (first name not known), from Hammanskraal According to reports received by Amnesty International, possibly as many as 150 people have been detained in the nominally independent "homeland" of Bophuthatswana since the weekend of 10/11 November 1990. Those detained are believed to be held under the terms of Bophuthatswana's state of emergency provisions, which permit any security force officer to detain a person without charge for an initial period of 30 days. Detention can then be renewed for a further five months on the authority of the Minister of Law and Order, and the detainee has no automatic right of access to a lawyer, doctor, or visits from relatives. One of those detained is Jomo Khasu, a long-time political activist from Vryburg in Northern Cape province who is now senior ANC regional organizer for the Northern Cape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cape Supergroup in Natal and the Northern Transkei
    485 The Cape Supergroup in Natal and the Northern Transkei SIR,—The rocks of the so-called Cape System (Cape Supergroup) of South Africa outcrop in two coastal belts, separated by 300 km of younger rocks (see map). In Cape Province, a full succession has been described (see Table 1), extending frorn possible Lower Cambrian to Upper Devonian. The Natal sequence is incomplete, and consists of 'thick . sandstones, with grits and conglomerates' (Anderson, 1901), resting on Precambrian rocks and overlain by Karroo strata. In his First Report of the Geological Survey of Natal and Zulu/and, Anderson (1901) observed that: 'Petrologically, they are very unlike the quartzites and grits of the Table Mountain Sandstones of Cape Colony.' In his Second Report, however, Anderson (1904) concluded: '... I think that there is no doubt as to the correlation of the formation spoken of in my first report as "Palaeozoic Sandstones", with the Table Mountain Sandstones of Cape Colony'. No palaeontological evidence existed to confirm or disprove this identification, but subsequent authors have accepted Anderson's conclusions, and reference to the 'Table Mountain Sandstones of Natal' is encountered commonly. Late in 1970, a few poorly preserved fossils were found by quarry workers at a locality about 5 km W of Port St Johns, in Pondoland. Originally thought to be fish, they were sent to Grahamstown, where they were identified as protolycopods. Similar lycopsids are known from the upper parts of the Bokkeveld Group, and from the Witteberg Group. Although rare lycopsids have been recorded from the Early Devonian, the class did not become abundant until later in the period; it is thus improbable that any strata containing lycopsids are correlatives of the pre-Devonian Table Mountain Group.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Northern Cape Province
    Section B:Section Profile B:Northern District HealthCape Province Profiles 14 Northern Cape Province John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipality (DC45) Overview of the district The John Taolo Gaetsewe District Municipalitya (previously Kgalagadi) is a Category C municipality located in the north of the Northern Cape Province, bordering Botswana in the west. It comprises the three local municipalities of Gamagara, Ga- Segonyana and Joe Morolong, and 186 towns and settlements, of which the majority (80%) are villages. The boundaries of this district were demarcated in 2006 to include the once north-western part of Joe Morolong and Olifantshoek, along with its surrounds, into the Gamagara Local Municipality. It has an established rail network from Sishen South and between Black Rock and Dibeng. It is characterised by a mixture of land uses, of which agriculture and mining are dominant. The district holds potential as a viable tourist destination and has numerous growth opportunities in the industrial sector. Area: 27 322km² Population (2016)b: 238 306 Population density (2016): 8.7 persons per km2 Estimated medical scheme coverage: 14.5% Cities/Towns: Bankhara-Bodulong, Deben, Hotazel, Kathu, Kuruman, Mothibistad, Olifantshoek, Santoy, Van Zylsrus. Main Economic Sectors: Agriculture, mining, retail. Population distribution, local municipality boundaries and health facility locations Source: Mid-Year Population Estimates 2016, Stats SA. a The Local Government Handbook South Africa 2017. A complete guide to municipalities in South Africa. Seventh
    [Show full text]
  • A Profile of the Western Cape Province: Demographics, Poverty, Inequality and Unemployment
    Background Paper Series Background Paper 2005:1(1) A profile of the Western Cape province: Demographics, poverty, inequality and unemployment Elsenburg August 2005 Overview The Provincial Decision-Making Enabling (PROVIDE) Project aims to facilitate policy design by supplying policymakers with provincial and national level quantitative policy information. The project entails the development of a series of databases (in the format of Social Accounting Matrices) for use in Computable General Equilibrium models. The National and Provincial Departments of Agriculture are the stakeholders and funders of the PROVIDE Project. The research team is located at Elsenburg in the Western Cape. PROVIDE Research Team Project Leader: Cecilia Punt Senior Researchers: Kalie Pauw Melt van Schoor Young Professional: Bonani Nyhodo Technical Expert: Scott McDonald Associate Researchers: Lindsay Chant Christine Valente PROVIDE Contact Details Private Bag X1 Elsenburg, 7607 South Africa [email protected] +27-21-8085191 +27-21-8085210 For the original project proposal and a more detailed description of the project, please visit www.elsenburg.com/provide PROVIDE Project Background Paper 2005:1(1) August 2005 A profile of the Western Cape province: Demographics, poverty, inequality and unemployment 1 Abstract This paper forms part of a series of papers that present profiles of South Africa’s provinces, with a specific focus on key demographic statistics, poverty and inequality estimates, and estimates of unemployment. In this volume comparative statistics are presented for agricultural and non-agricultural households, as well as households from different racial groups, locations (metropolitan, urban and rural areas) and district municipalities of the Western Cape. Most of the data presented are drawn from the Income and Expenditure Survey of 2000 and the Labour Force Survey of September 2000, while some comparative populations statistics are extracted from the National Census of 2001 (Statistics South Africa).
    [Show full text]
  • Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook 2017
    WESTERN CAPE BIODIVERSITY SPATIAL PLAN HANDBOOK Drafted by: CapeNature Scientific Services Land Use Team Jonkershoek, Stellenbosch 2017 Editor: Ruida Pool-Stanvliet Contributing Authors: Alana Duffell-Canham, Genevieve Pence, Rhett Smart i Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook 2017 Citation: Pool-Stanvliet, R., Duffell-Canham, A., Pence, G. & Smart, R. 2017. The Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook. Stellenbosch: CapeNature. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The compilation of the Biodiversity Spatial Plan and Handbook has been a collective effort of the Scientific Services Section of CapeNature. We acknowledge the assistance of Benjamin Walton, Colin Fordham, Jeanne Gouws, Antoinette Veldtman, Martine Jordaan, Andrew Turner, Coral Birss, Alexis Olds, Kevin Shaw and Garth Mortimer. CapeNature’s Conservation Planning Scientist, Genevieve Pence, is thanked for conducting the spatial analyses and compiling the Biodiversity Spatial Plan Map datasets, with assistance from Scientific Service’s GIS Team members: Therese Forsyth, Cher-Lynn Petersen, Riki de Villiers, and Sheila Henning. Invaluable assistance was also provided by Jason Pretorius at the Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning, and Andrew Skowno and Leslie Powrie at the South African National Biodiversity Institute. Patricia Holmes and Amalia Pugnalin at the City of Cape Town are thanked for advice regarding the inclusion of the BioNet. We are very grateful to the South African National Biodiversity Institute for providing funding support through the GEF5 Programme towards layout and printing costs of the Handbook. We would like to acknowledge the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Steering Committee, specifically Mervyn Lotter, for granting permission to use the Mpumalanga Biodiversity Sector Plan Handbook as a blueprint for the Western Cape Biodiversity Spatial Plan Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Griekwastad Tourism Brochure.Pdf
    Kontakbesonderhede / Contact details Griekwastad / Giquatown Uitgegee deur / Published by Mary Moffat Museum Griekwastad / Griquatown Ontwerp & uitleg / Designed by Hospitality@UrDoor PTY Ltd Tel: 083 610 7899 Fotos, inligting en advertensies / Photos, information and advertisements Museum, besighede en inwoners Museum, businesses & residents Hospitality@UrDoor PTY Ltd Tel: 083 610 7899 Digital Action, Paarden Eiland 021 511 9703 [email protected] Griekwastad / Griquatown Op reis na / En-route to Griekwastad / Griquatown GPS 28 51' 00'' 23 15' 00'' Die Korana-woord vir water is T!ama (uitroepteken, wat klapklank aandui) en ‘n waterryke vallei heet vanaf / from Kimberley T!ari (karréép), volgens WJ Burchell 1812. Vandaar N8– 152 km’s die naam Karrikamma, Griekwastad se eerste naam. Dit beteken dus dieselfde as Klaarwater (wat vanaf / from Upington N14- 284 km’s helder water beteken), wat tot 1813 gebruik is. Toe het sendeling John Campbell het die naam Omliggende dorpe / Surrounding towns verander na Griquatown / Griekwastad. Die agtervoegsel –kwa /qua beteken “seuns of manne Postmasburg– 68.7 km’s van”. Die naam Griekwastad beteken “seuns of manne van Chariguri of Grigri”. Douglas– 82.9 km’s Olifantshoek– 130 km’s Groblershoop– 138 km’s Kuruman– 194 km’s Bloemfontein– 314 km’s GRIEKWASTAD GRIQUATOWN Griekwastad is 'n dorp in die Noord- Griquatown is a town in the Northern Kaap, Suid-Afrika. Die N8 nasionale pad Cape province in South Africa. The N8 gaan deur Griekwastad. Kimberley is National Road runs through the town ongeveer 150 km oos van Griekwastad. and Kimberley is approximately 150 km’s east of Griquatown. Adam Kok II, 'n bevryde slaaf, het sy groep volgelinge (hulle is toe nog nie Adam Kok II, a freed slave, led his Griekwas genoem nie, en het uit talle followers from Piketberg to the current nasies bestaan, bv drostermatrose en Griquatown area.
    [Show full text]
  • SENTECH Integrated Annual Report 2016/17
    SENTECH Integrated Annual Report 2016/17 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................................................................................................2 ABOUT THIS REPORT ...........................................................................................................................................................4 Basis of Preparation ..........................................................................................................................................................................4 Report Scope and Boundaries ........................................................................................................................................................4 Determination of Report Content ...................................................................................................................................................4 Combined Assurance .......................................................................................................................................................................4 Forward-looking Statements ..........................................................................................................................................................5 Statement of Responsibility .............................................................................................................................................................5 1 ABOUT SENTECH ..............................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa
    Opting to Settle in a Small African Town A Case Study of Refugees in Towns Makhanda (formerly Grahamstown), South Africa Barnabas Ticha Muvhuti February, 2019 Contents Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction and Methods........................................................................................................................ 4 The Urban Impact...................................................................................................................................... 6 Mapping Makhanda’s Immigrant Population ......................................................................................... 8 Refugees’ Experiences ............................................................................................................................ 9 Conclusion............................................................................................................................................... 14 References ............................................................................................................................................... 15 Appendix A: Background on Refugees in South Africa .................................................................... 17 Appendix B: Background on Migration in Makhanda ........................................................................ 19 About the RIT Project ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 16 Number 2 Winter/Spring Article 4 May 2020 Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty Earle A. Partington Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Earle A. Partington, Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty, 16 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 247 (1988). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],dig- [email protected]. Walvis Bay: South Africa's Claims to Sovereignty EARLE A. PARTINGTON* I. INTRODUCTION After more than a century of colonial domination, the Mandated Territory of South West Africa/Namibia' is close to receiving-its indepen- dence. South Africa continues to administer the Territory as it has since its military forces conquered and occupied it in 1915 during World War I. In the negotiations between South Africa and the United Nations over Namibian independence, differences have arisen between the parties over whether the Territory includes either (1) the port and settlement of Walvis Bay, an enclave of 1124 square kilometers in the center of Namibia's Atlantic coast, or (2) the Penguin Islands, twelve small guano islands strung along 400 kilometers of the Namibian coast between Walvis Bay and the Orange River, the Orange River being part of the boundary between South Africa and Namibia.
    [Show full text]
  • Localisation of the 2030 Agenda and Its Sustainable Development Goals in Cape Town Report Written By: Sylvia Croese Reviewed By
    Localisation of the 2030 Agenda and its Sustainable Development Goals in Cape Town Report written by: Sylvia Croese Reviewed by City Authority staff: Carol Wright Natasha Primo Date: 4 November 2019 1. Introduction of the City and the Co-production Process The City of Cape Town (City, CCT) has a population of about 4 million inhabitants whiCh governs the jurisdiCtional area of Cape Town and all of its suburbs. It is located in the province of the Western Cape and is the seCond most populous City in the Country after Johannesburg. The City is one of eight metropolitan muniCipalities that were Created in 2000 as part of a series of muniCipal government reforms that took plaCe after the end of apartheid in 1994. Like all local governments in South AfriCa the City is responsible for the delivery of basiC serviCes such as water, sanitation, eleCtriCity and solid waste ColleCtion, but as a metropolitan muniCipality it has muniCipal exeCutive and legislative authority in its area, giving it more powers than local and distriCt muniCipalities. However, primary responsibility for social serviCes (education, health and welfare) and the built environment (human settlements) lies with the provincial and national governments, while national government departments have the mandate for water and eleCtriCity (energy) infrastructure. The City of Cape Town is South AfriCa's seCond-largest eConomiC Center, producing about 10% of South AfriCa’s GDP and aCCounting for almost two thirds of eConomiC aCtivity in the Western Cape province with finance, manufaCturing and tourism representing some of the biggest eConomiC seCtors. However, its Challenges include a fast-growing urban population, high levels of unemployment, crime and socio-eConomiC and spatial inequality.
    [Show full text]