DOCSLIB.ORG

AA-229 Sudley, (Cumberstone)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AA-229 Sudley, (Cumberstone) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 06-11-2004 o~oi.aC\ 2.as AA-229 Form 10-300 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE· (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Maryland COUNl'V· t NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES Anne Arundel INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY 1--·-~--~-:;;;~~~R-·- --r-o" re:·- (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) r I L':~·~-------·-- --------- ---- . -~-- C OMfAON Sudley - AND'OR t-11STORIC: Cumbers tone ___ G__ ------------- 1 0 !.?.· l~r~~: r ~rn: NUMflERI West sld_e_of-ora-su"C1iey rfoad~ west of Maryland I /_R~.'!~~-~_6__ Bj___~_rnj.l.-_~~--~9_u~~~~-~~-!-~~-~~_?!io~~~~EI:~an!!~-~-te 255_.J '.lf{ on l(JWN: anu MaryJ..anLl 1'0Ute 468., l West River 0 J~~~y~a:'d 20 001 . J ';~· l' """1mne Arun-ae1 K%fj [f CLASSIFICATION I -i-- - - CA HGORY. - -- -,------ -~~~-;f~P. - - --i--· STATU~ ACCE:SSl!ILf "j z ~~-~::~,!c~lu·~ ~~~~Building] I -Pob;;; Mio<,;;:;:;;;,,---- ·---1~; O<eo,::;-- TO;:.: PUAUC I 0 Ir .l Sile :· 1 Struclure J Private I In Proce55 JI I Unoccupied I l Rt>strictpcf I l_J Ob1oct I I lloth [ J Being Con•idered I I PreservoloOn work I I Unr~strocted on progreu l Kl No I LI PRESENT USE (Ch<!ck On<' orftlnn• ""Appropriate) l r-- ------ -------· - - -- ----- --------------------------------·------ ---~ XJ Agricullural [~I Gov.,rnment l -J Park [_J Tronsportation 0 Carnmentt I :.l Commercial [ _l, lndu.troal Kl Privote Residence r-l Other (Spe>c/fy) J Educotoonal .I Militocy [ I Relig'.ov> -------- 2!nt:rtainmenl [:J Museum [_J Sci:.~:-_ 4. OWNER OF PROPERTY ·--------=-- --- - --~ z •:lWNER"S N-;;;:;;E,------------ -·--- ------------- - ·-------- ···--·--·----~ Mrs. T. Harrunond Welsh -------------- - ----- ------- --- -----·le ti w STREET AND NUMBER: : '< w 10ld Sudley Road ' I-' ---- -- ------------ --- ---fSTATsTAT·.=-:--------- 1 Maryland ------ .. ---- --- --- LOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRll-'TION 2~-;;~-rnt ,-,- l~~---~--T~-_0_~_,_;_:uR~~~~RY c_0~~n_r-_-~-~- - ~T~urthouse ------ -- -- - ------- 11 5" 0 ~REET JINO NIJMBER: ------·- - ---------- -·- -----------------·- --!~ :~ I Church Circle --------- --- --- ------ e ('TT OR TOWI•: F' F ""''' I J:;:-~::.~ON I~ J~IS_TIN~_vE y S- --- ~~.~ -~ --Maryl and 214 0-l-~~;,; ]/I z] l~~;;i~~n~E~egister of Historic Sites and Landmarks , r " lo~-;;-;~-;-vo: -=1§70----------- f:-j -F-~der~I I~ Stote '. J C~-;,n~~--- rL-0~;1 - - . f - ; ~ tDEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS: ----------- ------"-1 C Z !Maryland Historical Trust i ~I~ sTR-EET-A~-NuMa·~-------------------- ------- --------------·------.. --------"1 "'I0 l c~I ~~:";~~~~:Roa~--- ----:- -- ["''' Marylan~~;~~0-1 H~·~i u~ 1I __ l·::L J ----------- ·------· ~--- AA-229 LL oesc_•••T!DNr ,::.."."' - L~G"~-.. t~1 -~~;.--·· t~ 1( ~~·::::;~.:·;~-~--~~:~.- c1 une•po•ed CONDITION - ------· ]-- - ·----------1 (Check Ori<') (Check One) L~--~''"'"~---·-------kl __Unaltered ____ __il Moved QO Originol Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (II known) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Sudley is' located on the west side of Old Sudley Road in the ancient Wes~ River Hundred. It is west of Maryland Route 468, and three miles south of the intersection of Maryland Routes 255 and 468. Well preserved, restored (1950), and essentially unchanged since the seventeenth century, Sudley gives us a valuable picture of the Quaker way of life, significant in the forming of Anne Arundel County. This one-and-one-half story, white, weatherboarded house, with its steep roof typical of the Medieval Transitional style, stands at the top of an abrupt slope near the headwaters of West River. It is shaded by ancient Tulip Poplars. The chimneys standing within the gable-ends are the largest in m any surviving seventeenth-century house in Anne Arundel County. The framing, siding, and roofing members are of handhewn timber. m 1 The center part of the house was built before 1683. It consist~ z ed of a Great Hall and Parlor on the first floor, and three bedrooms above, which were reached by a stairway winding up around a chimney corner. The greater affluence of the eighteenth century brought embel- c=: lishments by Richard Galloway III, who inherited the simple [ n house in 1 720. Ile put raised panelling in the Great Hall and j -f Parlor and possibly added a kitchen wing on the northwest corne~. Kensey Johns II was responsible for the addition of two one- I 0 and-one-half-story wings after 1750. His son, John Johns, z 1 changed the property name from "Cumberstone" to "Sudley" before I "' the 1800 resurvey of the land. / I Sixteen acres are designated for the protection of Sudley. The\ structure stands on the crest of a ridge, framed by woodlands . at the back (northwest) and looking southeast down the slope J of the ridge, across the tree-lined Old Sudley Road, a public : way, towards a meadow. ,- I l_ ----------- AA-229 SIGNIFICANCE PERIOD (Checlc One or More as Appropriate) 0 Pre-Columbian: 0 16th Century [] 18th Century [I 20th Century 0 15th Century KJ 17th Century I I 19th Centu1y SPEC I FI C DATE I SI (lf Applicable and Known) 1 (!§.~t~~~~sc.,!,~i.....L.l...l,L__!~~..W..~---------l 0 AREAS OF' S1GNIFICANCE (Cher.I< Oneo or More llll Appru11rluft•) Aboriginal CJ Education 11 Political I:.·! Urban Planning CJ Prehistoric 11 Engint!uing !XJ Religion Phi. [J Other !Sl'rdh-> 0 Historic [ l I ndu• try lo•ophy [J Agriculture u Invention I I Science Pt] Architecture lJ Landscape I Seu Ip lurr [ J Art Arr.hit"ctur" Soc 10 I ·Human. lJ Comm•rt:• l I Litoroturo i tur ian [] CommuniC'otlon1 _I Military Tht!alrr 1-J Conservation I 'j Music I l Tro1Hpnrtot1on -------------------· ---------------------- STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Su<lley's historical significance sterns from its association with Kensey Johns, Chief Justice of the Delaware Supreme Court and Chancellor of Delaware; John Johns, Bishop of Virginia and President of the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg, :z Virginia; the ancestors of Johns Hopkins, the Baltimore bene­ 0 factor; Kensey Johns II, a Sheriff of Anne Arundel County; and two female Quaker ministers, Sarah Harrison Thomas and Ann t­ Galloway. Ownership of Sudley by the Quaker families of Johns u and Galloway connects the house with Anne Arundel County's Quaker heritage. ::::> a:: Sudley is located on original Cumberstone land, patented in t- 1659 to John Cumber. Cumber served in Oliver Cromwell's army in England before receiving his commission in 1658 as a Captain z in the Severn and Isle of Kent Regiment of the Maryland Mili- I tia. This regiment was established by the Maryland provinical I government in 1657. Cumber's superior officer in the militia was Major Ewen of Cedar Park, Anne Arundel County. 1 Cumber gave one hundred acres of Cumbers tone to his son-in-law,\ Thomas Pratt, who sold the property to Richard Arnold, a · Quaker, in 1672. One of these three men, Cumber, Pratt, or Arnold, built the oldest section of the house. It was stand­ ing in 1683 when Arnold died. Richard Arnold immigrated to Maryland in 1649. Settling in the South River Hundred.of Anne Arundel County, he gave up his trade as a tailor to become a planter. Soon after his pur­ chase of Curnberstone from Pratt, he married Martha Thomas, a member of an outstanding Maryland Quaker family. Her father, Philip Thomas, was a founder of both the Herring Creek Meeting and the West River Meeting. Her mother, Sarah Harrison Thomas, was a Quaker minister. Richard Arnold was also a prominent Quaker and a member of the West River Quaker Meeting. He later1 moved into the West River Ilundred, in which Sudley is located, 1 and the inventory drawn up at his death testifies to the pros­ perity of this West River tobacco planter.l This inventory is located in tht.... Hall of Records, ; Annap_Q.l.i:L-.Mary.lan~----- ------~----- _______ ______________ ·-----·- ------·-- --·-- -- __ 1 [see continuation sheet] • --- M-229 Form 10-3000 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE (July 1969) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Maryland INVENTORY· NOMINATION FORM FOR NPS USE ONLY ENTRY NUMBER I DATE (Continuation Sheet) ..-------------------------------''-------------J____ ~ (Number ell enlr/eeJ Sudley 8. SIGNIFICANCE, continued Samuel Galloway ( ? -1719) purchased Cumberstone (Sudley) in the early eighteenth century from Sarah Arnold Waters, daughter of Richard Arnold, one of the three possible builders of the house. Galloway, a merchant and planter whose extensive land holdings included properties adjacent to Sudley, was founder of the West River Meeting. In 1686, 1688, and 1691, before the construction of the meeting house, West River Quakers held sev­ eral meetings at "The Gift," Galloway's home. George Fox (1624-1691), the founder of the Society of Friends, was present at several of these meetings. Galloway's wife, Ann Gallowav, was a Quaker minister. Samuel Galloway's descendants can be connected with White's Hall, Cedar Park, Arden, and Hawthorne Ridge, all in Anne Arundel County. Richard Galloway III inherited "Cumberstone" before 1720. Ile and his father, Samuel Galloway, were prominent Anne Arundel County Quakers.
Recommended publications
  • No-Discharge Zones for Vessel Sewage in Maryland and Virginia

    No-Discharge Zones for Vessel Sewage in Maryland and Virginia

    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 05/11/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-09957, and on govinfo.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FRL 10021-74-Region 3] Clean Water Act: No-Discharge Zones for Vessel Sewage in Maryland and Virginia AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice–final determination. SUMMARY: On behalf of the State of Maryland, the Secretary of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources requested that the Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3 approve a no-discharge zone for thirteen water bodies in Anne Arundel County, Maryland pursuant to the Clean Water Act. After review of Maryland’s application, EPA determined that adequate facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonable available for all thirteen waterbodies within Anne Arundel County. The application is available upon request from EPA (at the email address below). DATES: This approval is effective upon the date of publication in the Federal Register on [INSTERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ferry Akbar Buchanan, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region III. Telephone: (215) 814-2570; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Clean Water Act section 312(f)(3), if any state determines that the protection and enhancement of the quality of some or all of the state’s waters require greater environmental protection, the state may designate the waters as a vessel sewage no-discharge zone. However, the state may not establish the no-discharge zone until EPA has determined that adequate pumpout facilities for the safe and sanitary removal and treatment of sewage from all vessels are reasonably available for the proposed waters.
  • Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 V Olume 89 Number 1 March 2020

    Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 V Olume 89 Number 1 March 2020

    Volume 89 Volume Number 1 March 2020 Volume 89 Number 1 March 2020 Historical Society of the Episcopal Church Benefactors ($500 or more) President Dr. F. W. Gerbracht, Jr. Wantagh, NY Robyn M. Neville, St. Mark’s School, Fort Lauderdale, Florida William H. Gleason Wheat Ridge, CO 1st Vice President The Rev. Dr. Thomas P. Mulvey, Jr. Hingham, MA J. Michael Utzinger, Hampden-Sydney College Mr. Matthew P. Payne Appleton, WI 2nd Vice President The Rev. Dr. Warren C. Platt New York, NY Robert W. Prichard, Virginia Theological Seminary The Rev. Dr. Robert W. Prichard Alexandria, VA Secretary Pamela Cochran, Loyola University Maryland The Rev. Dr. Gardiner H. Shattuck, Jr. Warwick, RI Treasurer Mrs. Susan L. Stonesifer Silver Spring, MD Bob Panfil, Diocese of Virginia Director of Operations Matthew P. Payne, Diocese of Fond du Lac Patrons ($250-$499) [email protected] Mr. Herschel “Vince” Anderson Tempe, AZ Anglican and Episcopal History The Rev. Cn. Robert G. Carroon, PhD Hartford, CT Dr. Mary S. Donovan Highlands Ranch, CO Editor-in-Chief The Rev. Cn. Nancy R. Holland San Diego, CA Edward L. Bond, Natchez, Mississippi The John F. Woolverton Editor of Anglican and Episcopal History Ms. Edna Johnston Richmond, VA [email protected] The Rev. Stephen A. Little Santa Rosa, CA Church Review Editor Richard Mahfood Bay Harbor, FL J. Barrington Bates, Prof. Frederick V. Mills, Sr. La Grange, GA Diocese of Newark [email protected] The Rev. Robert G. Trache Fort Lauderdale, FL Book Review Editor The Rev. Dr. Brian K. Wilbert Cleveland, OH Sheryl A. Kujawa-Holbrook, Claremont School of Theology [email protected] Anglican and Episcopal History (ISSN 0896-8039) is published quarterly (March, June, September, and Sustaining ($100-$499) December) by the Historical Society of the Episcopal Church, PO Box 1301, Appleton, WI 54912-1301 Christopher H.
  • MDE-Water Pollution

    MDE-Water Pollution

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION Chapters 01-10 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 1 Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION .................................................................................................................... 1 Chapters 01-10 ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Title 26 DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................... 2 Subtitle 08 WATER POLLUTION .................................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 01 General ......................................................................................................................................... 2 .01 Definitions................................................................................................................................................. 3 .02 Principles of Water Pollution Control....................................................................................................
  • 1823 Journal of General Convention

    1823 Journal of General Convention

    Journal of the Proceedings of the Bishops, Clergy, and Laity of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America in a General Convention 1823 Digital Copyright Notice Copyright 2017. The Domestic and Foreign Missionary Society of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America / The Archives of the Episcopal Church All rights reserved. Limited reproduction of excerpts of this is permitted for personal research and educational activities. Systematic or multiple copy reproduction; electronic retransmission or redistribution; print or electronic duplication of any material for a fee or for commercial purposes; altering or recompiling any contents of this document for electronic re-display, and all other re-publication that does not qualify as fair use are not permitted without prior written permission. Send written requests for permission to re-publish to: Rights and Permissions Office The Archives of the Episcopal Church 606 Rathervue Place P.O. Box 2247 Austin, Texas 78768 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 512-472-6816 Fax: 512-480-0437 JOURNAL .. MTRJI OJr TllII "BISHOPS, CLERGY, AND LAITY O~ TIU; PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH XII TIIJ! UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Xif A GENERAL CONVENTION, Held in St. l'eter's Church, in the City of Philadelphia, from the 20th t" .the 26th Day of May inclusive, A. D. 1823. NEW· YORK ~ PlllNTED BY T. lit J. SWURDS: No. 99 Pearl-street, 1823. The Right Rev. William White, D. D. of Pennsylvania, Pre­ siding Bishop; The Right Rev. John Henry Hobart, D. D. of New-York, The Right Rev. Alexander Viets Griswold, D. D. of the Eastern Diocese, comprising the states of Maine, New­ Hampshire, Massachusct ts, Vermont, and Rhode Island, The Right Rev.
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1946, Volume 41, Issue No. 4

    Maryland Historical Magazine, 1946, Volume 41, Issue No. 4

    MHRYMnD CWAQAZIU^j MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY BALTIMORE DECEMBER • 1946 t. IN 1900 Hutzler Brothers Co. annexed the building at 210 N. Howard Street. Most of the additional space was used for the expansion of existing de- partments, but a new shoe shop was installed on the third floor. It is interesting to note that the shoe department has now returned to its original location ... in a greatly expanded form. HUTZLER BPOTHERSe N\S/Vsc5S8M-lW MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE A Quarterly Volume XLI DECEMBER, 1946 Number 4 BALTIMORE AND THE CRISIS OF 1861 Introduction by CHARLES MCHENRY HOWARD » HE following letters, copies of letters, and other documents are from the papers of General Isaac Ridgeway Trimble (b. 1805, d. 1888). They are confined to a brief period of great excitement in Baltimore, viz, after the riot of April 19, 1861, when Federal troops were attacked by the mob while being marched through the City streets, up to May 13th of that year, when General Butler, with a large body of troops occupied Federal Hill, after which Baltimore was substantially under control of the 1 Some months before his death in 1942 the late Charles McHenry Howard (a grandson of Charles Howard, president of the Board of Police in 1861) placed the papers here printed in the Editor's hands for examination, and offered to write an introduction if the Committee on Publications found them acceptable for the Magazine. Owing to the extraordinary events related and the revelation of an episode unknown in Baltimore history, Mr. Howard's proposal was promptly accepted.
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report

    Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report

    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
  • The History of the College of William and Mary from Its Foundation, 1693

    The History of the College of William and Mary from Its Foundation, 1693

    1693 - 1870 m 1m mmtm m m m&NBm iKMi Sam On,•'.;:'.. m '' IIP -.•. m : . UBS . mm W3m BBSshsR iillltwlll ass I HHH1 m '. • ml §88 BmHRSSranH M£$ Sara ,mm. mam %£kff EARL GREGG SWEM LIBRARY THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY IN VIRGINIA Presented By Dorothy Dickinson PIPPEN'S a BOOI^ a g OllD STORE, 5j S) 60S N. Eutaw St. a. BALT WORE. BOOES EOUOE' j ESCHANQED. 31 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://www.archive.org/details/historyofcollege1870coll 0\JI.LCkj£ THE HISTORY College of William and Mary From its Foundation, 1693, to 1870. BALTIMOKE: Printed by John Murphy & Co. Publishers, Booksellers, Printers and Stationers, 182 Baltimore Street. 1870. Oath of Visitor, I. A. B., do golemnly promise and swear, that I will truly and faith- fully execute the duties of my office, as a vistor of William and Mary College, according to the best of my skill and judgment, without favour, affection or partiality. So help me God. Oath of President or Professor. I, do swear, that I will well and truly execute the duties of my office of according to the best of my ability. So help me God. THE CHARTER OF THE College of William and Mary, In Virginia. WILLIAM AND MARY, by the grace of God, of England, Scot- land, France and Ireland, King and Queen, defenders of the faith, &c. To all to whom these our present letters shall come, greeting. Forasmuch as our well-beloved and faithful subjects, constituting the General Assembly of our Colony of Virginia, have had it in their minds, and have proposed
  • Faith and Learning the Heritage of J

    Faith and Learning the Heritage of J

    REVIEW: Hoffecker’s Charles Hodge by Barry Waugh NewHorizons in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church OCT 2012 OCT Faith and LearninG The Heritage of J. Gresham Machen by Katherine VanDrunen ALSO: NEW BOOKS ON OLD PRINCETON by D. G. Hart and John R. Muether V o l u m e 3 3 , N u m b e r 9 NewHorizoNs iN tHe ortHodox PresbyteriaN CHurch Contents Editorial Board: The Committee on Christian Education’s Subcommittee on Serial Publications Editor: Danny E. Olinger FEATURES Managing Editor: James W. Scott Editorial Assistant: Patricia Clawson Cover Designer: Christopher Tobias 3 Faith and Learning: The Heritage of Proofreader: Sarah J. Pederson J. Gresham Machen © 2012 by The Committee on Christian Education of By Katherine VanDrunen The Orthodox Presbyterian Church. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise indicated, all Scripture quotations are 6 The Personal Side of Charles Hodge from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publish- By Alan D. Strange ers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Articles previously published may be slightly edited. The Legacy of Geerhardus Vos 8 New Horizons (ISSN: 0199-3518) is published monthly By Danny E. Olinger except for a combined issue, usually August-Septem- ber, by the Committee on Christian Education of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church, 607 N. Easton Road, 19 Planning for a Minister’s Retirement Bldg. E, Willow Grove, PA 19090-2539; tel. 215/830- By Douglas L. Watson 0900; fax 215/830-0350. Letters to the editor are welcome. They should deal with an issue the magazine has recently addressed.
  • Attachment A-1 Adjacent Property Owner Table

    Attachment A-1 Adjacent Property Owner Table

    ATTACHMENT A JPA SECTION 6 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION ATTACHMENT A-1 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER TABLE Attachment A-1 Method on Conducting Adjacent Property Owner Search As part of the Joint Permit Application, information on property owners adjacent to the project site, across the waterway of the project, and ½ mile downstream of the proposed project components are required. Information on the adjacent property owners were obtained in five counties, including Louisa County, Spotsylvania County, Orange County, King William County, and King and Queen County. Due to the size and scope of the proposed project, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality recommended that Dominion contact the Commissioner of Revenue within each county to help identify the property owners. The table below provides specific detail for each county on how the property information was obtained. Format of Date County Method Data Received For property owners located adjacent to Lake Anna and the Dominion property, an email was sent to Nancy Pleasant, Louisa GIS Commissioner of Revenue requesting information. Nancy 6/17/10 County Shapefiles Pleasant forwarded the request to Matthias Smith, County GIS Coordinator. Email sent to Debbie Williams, Commissioner of Revenue. Spotsylvania Received email from Janet Loyd, Assistant to Commissioner GIS 6/21/10 County of Revenue, who forwarded request to David West, County Shapefiles GIS Specialist. Email sent to Donna Chewning, Commissioner of Revenue. Donna Chewning forwarded email to Deborah Kendall, Orange GIS County Interim Planning Director. Deborah Kendall requested 10/14/09 County Shapefiles information from their GIS Contractor. Files verified through Orange County’s on-line tool June 2010. King William Email sent to Betty Brooks, GIS Technician.
  • River Herring Program – 2009‐2016 Grants

    River Herring Program – 2009‐2016 Grants

    River Herring Program – 2009‐2016 Grants RIVER HERRING PROGRAM River Herring NORTHEAST REGION Assessing Sustainability of Maine River Herring Runs Maine Department of Marine Resources Maine Award Amount....................................................................... $400,483 Grantee Match ...................................................................... $415,340 Total Project ............................................................................ $815,823 Collect river herring population data on numerous rivers in order to create management and harvest models to help ensure the sustainability of the fishery. Project will also hire an education specialist to work with inland communities to help gain acceptance for reintroduction of river herring. River Herring Bycatch Avoidance in Small Mesh Fisheries (MA) University of Massachusetts Massachusetts Award Amount....................................................................... $305,640 Grantee Match ...................................................................... $376,929 Total Project ............................................................................ $682,569 Develop river herring bycatch avoidance incentive systems based on models that identify and predict high concentrations of river herring. Project will help to minimize bycatch of river herring in the Atlantic herring and mackerel fisheries in New England. Updated May 2017 River Herring Program – 2009‐2016 Grants Identification and Modeling of Alewife Stock Structure Gulf of Maine Research Institute
  • Stories of Old New Castle

    Stories of Old New Castle

    Stories of Old New Castle • • • • • .' Compiled by ANNE R. JANVIER Stories of Old New Castle In the number and variety of namcs bestowed upon this little lawn of New Castle. we read the history of the place . • It begins when the milld of man "runneth 110t to the con­ trary; this Indian village on the !.>..,nks of the stream of which Aresapha is the most mclodious name and Mackerish-Kittoll the worst. The village they called T3ma konck (place of the Bea\'er) the Indian deed for this is still extant. A few more of the names which meant home to tllOSC who dwelt on this poiTlt of land, were Sand hukcn, Grape Vine Point, Windruffe-uddcn, Ft. Casimir, Fe Traf.ddighects (or Trinity Fort), Ft. Casimir again, New Amstcl. New Castle. The River besides the naJllcs mentioned was called the Poutaxat, Lenni!>i Whittock. the Zuydt or South River, (in distinction from the l'\orth River or the Hudson) , and lastly the Delaware. On Augusr, 28, 1609, the first ship winged its way up the river. The Half Moon, with Hendrick Hudson looking for the North \Vest Passage to China-on past this sandy hook jutting out intu the great river. The Indians of the Lenni-Lenape tribe were peacefully fi shing and plying their canoes. The Half Moon sailed swiftly down again without landing here, having decided that this \\'as no thoroughfare to China. Upon such slight grounds as this hasty trip with twu temporary scttlements, one at Swaanendalc and one at Ft. Nassau, rt!Sts the Dutch claim to the whole Delaware River and shores and hy this was the claim of Lord Baltimore refuted, his grant calling for land not previously settled.
  • Research Design

    Research Design

    PHASE IB ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT AGREEMENT 1416, TASK 7 SECTION 1 U.S. ROUTE 301 PROJECT DEVELOPEMENT NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DELAWARE Prepared for: Delaware Department of Transportation PO Box 778 Dover, Delaware 19902 Prepared by: Archaeological & Historical Consultants, Inc. 101 North Pennsylvania Avenue P.O. Box 482 Centre Hall, Pennsylvania 16828 January 2011 PHASE IB ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT AGREEMENT 1416, TASK 7 SECTION 1 U.S. ROUTE 301 PROJECT DEVELOPEMENT NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DELAWARE Prepared for: Delaware Department of Transportation PO Box 778 Dover, Delaware 19902 Prepared by: Archaeological & Historical Consultants, Inc. 101 North Pennsylvania Avenue P.O. Box 482 Centre Hall, Pennsylvania 16828 January 2011 i ABSTRACT Phase Ib archaeological survey was conducted for Section 1 of the US 301 Project Development, located in St. Georges Hundred, New Castle County, Delaware. The proposed project consists of the construction of a limited access highway on new alignment. Field methods consisted primarily of pedestrian surface survey, together with shovel test and test unit excavations in wooded areas, in areas of potential buried soils, and at discovered archaeological sites. Field survey resulted in the identification of 19 historic resources, including 18 archaeological sites and one historic landscape feature. Three archaeological sites had only prehistoric components, eight sites had both prehistoric and historic components, and seven sites had only historic components. Five of the 18 archaeological sites are recommended not eligible on the basis of the Phase Ib survey. Phase II survey is recommended for 13 of the archaeological sites, to further evaluate their eligibility. Phase II survey is also recommended for the landscape feature, a historic railroad line.