DOCSLIB.ORG

Author Surname Beginning with “A” Collection Created by Dr. George C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Author Surname Beginning with “A” Collection created by Dr. George C. Rable Documents Added as of August 2021 Affleck Family. “Life in Civil War Central Texas: Letters from Mr. and Mrs. Thomas Affleck to Private Isaac Dunbar Affleck.” Edited by Robert W. Williams and Ralph A. Wooster. Texana 7 (Summer 1969): 146-62. Brenham, Texas, planter and agricultural reformer Lost pistol, price, blockade, 147 Hard times at home, 148ff Illness, home and camp, 149 Pistol, 149 A doctor to be sent away to Mexico, 150 Worries about his diet, 151 Lost pistol and hard times at home, 151-52, 154 Boxes, 152 Yankees in Louisiana, 152 Shortages and prices at home, 153 Impressment and taxes, ambulances, 155 Various items to be supplies from home, 156 Farming at home, 157 Blockade runners, Mexican waters, France, 158 Makes and sell ambulances, 158 et passim Furlough, 159 Death of a young soldiers, 161 Allen, Lucy. “Diary of Miss Lucy Allen of Clifton.” Clarke County Historical Association Proceedings 9 (1949): 26-35. Near Berryville, Virginia Three Yankees for dinner, 26 Snow, 27 Lost faith in slaves, 28 Yankees searching for arms, 28 Chancellorsville, 30-31 Milroy carrying off slaves, 31 Death of Stonewall Jackson, 32 House full of Yankee soldiers, 32 Armes, Frank H. “A Cruise on the U.S.S. Sabine.” Edited by James N. J. Henrwood. American Neptune 29 (April 1969): 102-6. Gale, 103 2 Ocean voyage, 103 Problem with the guns, 103-4 Cape Verde Islands, 104 Death at sea, 105 Ashay, Reverend B. Fauman. “A Minister Keeps His Faith.” Civil War Times 42 (February 2004): electronic, no pagination. Christian Commission Housed in confiscated home Distributed papers among freedmen soldiers Deserter execution Christmas Men killed by guerrillas Badly wounded soldier Lice Grierson raid, 3rd Iowa Cavalry, Grierson Black religious service Soldier dying, diarrhea Southern Methodist prayer meeting Aycock, Roger. “The Diary of Reuben S. Norton Records What Happened in Rome from 1861 to 1865.” Georgia Life 3 (No. 4, 1977): 18-19, 36 New England-born Rome merchant Food prices, 18 Hospitals, 18 Gold prices, 18 Bridges, Jefferson C. Davis, 19 Freed slaves sent north, 19 Sherman’s troops, fires, 19, 38 Raiding by Confederate deserters and draft dodgers, 38 Documents Added as of March 2020 Anonymous. “The Suffolk Slaughter: ‘We Did Not Take Any Prisoners.’” Civil War Times Illustrated 23 (May 1984): 36-39. Staff officer, General Matt W. Ransom’s Division, Petersburg Daily Register, March 22, 1864 Murder of soldier in 2nd United States Colored Cavalry, 36ff Seeking forage and food, 37 Marching, 37 3 Soldiers escaping a burning house were bayoneted, 38-39 Women wept to see them leave, black soldiers, 39 Documents Added as of January 2020 Addison-Darnelle, Henrietta Stockton. “For Better or For Worse.” Civil War Times Illustrated 31 (May-June 1992): 32-35, 73. Honeymoon trip out of enemy lines to Richmond, 32ff Secession, 32 Alexandria, Virginia, 33 Wedding, 33 Travel by steamer south,, 33ff Manassas, 34 Reached Yorktown, 35 Sheridan raid in 1865, 35, 73 Albert, Louis Philippe, Comte de Paris. “We Prepare to Receive the Enemy Where We Stand.” Edited by Mark Grimsley. Translated by Bernatello Glod. Civil War Times Illustrated 24 (March 1985): 18-30. McClellan’s army on the Peninsula Hooker, Williamsburg, 19-30 Sumner and Keyes, 19 Stoneman, 19 McClellan on the battlefield, 20 Dead on the battlefield, 24 Fort Magruder, 25 Entering Williamsburg, 26 Hospital, surgeons, 26 Hancock, 28 Arthurs, Robert. “The Man Who Played Doctor.” Civil War Times Illustrated 19 (August 1980): 36-38. Memoir, Petersburg Impersonated a contract surgeon Could not enlist because of bad lungs, 36 Substitute, bounty jumper, 36 18th Corp Hospital, 36 Amputation, 37 4 Prisoners, 38 msn shot off his thumb, 38 saved men from amputations, 38 Ayers, Oliver C. “Pursuing General Forrest: ‘This Looked But Little Like Trying to Catch the Enemy.’” Edited by Dale S. Snair. Civil War Times Illustrated 23 (September 1984): 20-24, 28-33. 39th Iowa Infantry, Lieutenant Sleeping on our arms, Jackson, Tennessee, 22 Cotton bales breastworks, 23 Chasing Forrest, 23ff Humbolt, Tennessee, sleeping in railroad cars, 24 Foraging, 24 Marching, guide, 25 Sore feet and illness, 25 Foraging, 25 Skirmish with Confederate cavalry, 29 Parker’s Crossroads, 30-33 Documents added as of August 2019 Abbott, John S. C. “Grierson’s Raid.” Harper’s New Monthly Magazine 30 (February 1865): 273-81. Grierson raid into Mississippi, 273 New Albany, 273 Details of the movements, 273ff Enterprise, 275 Severely wounded colonel, 280 Slaves, 283 Effects of raid, 283 Documents added as of July 2019 Alexander, Edward Porter. “”Longstreet’s Brigade.” Transactions of the Southern Historical Society 2 (1875): 53-63. “Letter from Jubal Early,” 73-74. Sketch of Longstreet, 53-54 First Manassas, Bull Run, 54-61 5 Raw troops vs. veterans, 54-55 Movement toward Washington, 61-63 Early disputes Alexander’s account of First Manassas, 72 Fredericksburg, 73-74 Alexander, Edward Porter. “The Movement Against Petersburg.” Scribner’s Magazine 41 (1907): 180-94. Crisis of the war in the summer of 1864, 180ff Lee delayed and did not believe that Grant had crossed the James, 181, 183 Dispatches and troop movements, 183ff Missed opportunity by Federals, 185 Confederates lost this first big move, 187 Petersburg mine, 187-94 Alexander, Edward Porter. “Sevens Days’ Battles.” Transactions of the Southern Historical Society 2 (1875): 99-116. Robert E. Lee, 99 Longstreet’s division, 100 Jackson delay, 104-5 Mechanicsville, 105 Gaines’s Mill, 108-113 Seven Days, 104-116—article is incomplete and apparently was never completely printed Ames, Adelbert. “The Failure at Fort Fisher.” Overland Monthly 4 (June 1870): 488-96. Bermuda Hundred, 488 Benjamin F. Butler, sailing to Fort Fisher, 489ff At sea, Beaufort, 489-493 Fort Fisher, 493ff Downplays the failure, 495-96 Ames, Adelbert. “The Second Bull Run.” Overland Monthly 8 (May 1872): 399-406. Marching, 399 Second Bull Run, 399ff Fitz John Porter, 399 Corps advanced, then withdrawn, 399 Wounded soldiers, 401 Avoided capture, 405 Documents added as of June 2019 6 Ames, John Worthington. “The Second Bull Run.” Overland Monthly 8 (May 1872): 399-406. 11th United States Infantry Marching, dust, heat, 399 No faith in McClellan or Pope, 399 Porter’s corps moved very little, 399 Fitz John Porter, 399-400 Second Bull Run, 400ff Dead and wounded, 400-1 McDowell, 403 Anderson, Thomas McArthur. “General George H. Thomas.” Journal of the Military Service Institution of the United States 56 (1915): 37-42. 12th United States Infantry Fort Sumter, Pope, McClellan, 37 George H. Thomas, 38ff Loyalty, 39 Buckner, 40 Bull Run, Fitz John Porter, 40 Discipline, 41-42 Anderson, Thomas McArthur. “General Hooker.” Journal of the Military Service Institution of the United States 55 (1914): 404-8. 12th United States Infantry Defends Hooker, 404 Hooker and retreat at Chancellorsville, 405 Knights of the Golden Circle trial, 405-6 Hooker and feeding of prisoners on Johnson’s Island, 406 Hooker and galvanized Confederates, 406-7 Hooker on Thomas at Nashville, 407 Hooker did not like to think ill of anyone who was brave, 407-8 Not suited to command an army, 408 Anderson, Thomas McArthur. “Was Gettysburg the Decisive Battle of the War?” Journal of the Military Service Institution of the United States 13 (1892): 269-75. 12th United State Infantry A drawn battle, war continued, 270 Vicksburg a severer loss than Gettysburg, 271 Chattanooga a worse defeat than Gettysburg, 272 Confederates fought hard in Overland campaign, 272-73 7 Confederates lost hope when Grant besieged Petersburg, 274 Gettysburg was not the decisive battle of the war, 275 “Armory Square Hospital.” Northern Monthly 1 (December 1864): 688-95. Washington hospitals, 688 Armory Square Hospital, 688ff Details description, 688ff Surgeon Dr. Bliss, 690 Surgeons, 691 Ward, beds, 691 Patients, 691 Attendants and various other personnel, 692 Medicine, food, limited government expenditures, 693-95 Library, 695 Arnold, Abraham K. “The Cavalry at Gaines’ Mill.” Journal of the United States Cavalry Association 2 (1889): 355-62. 5th United States Cavalry Fitz John Porter, 355ff Organization of the cavalry, 356-57 Cavalry action, casualties, 359 Porter blamed cavalry for abandonment of artillery, 360 Cavalry was small and Confederate numbers overwhelming, 361 Cavalry deserved praise rather than censure, 363 Arnold, Abraham K. “A Reminiscence—The Fifth U.S. Regular Cavalry with General Sheridan on Raid Towards Richmond, Va., in 1864.” Journal of the United States Cavalry Association 2 (1889): 28-33. 5th United States Cavalry Cavalry organization, 28 Overland campaign, 28ff Marching to rear of Lee’s army, 28ff Attacked railroad and recaptured prisoners, 29 Beaver Dam Station, 29-33 Documents added as of February 2019 Ackerman, Michael. “After the Battle of Pleasant Hill.” Annals of Iowa, series 3, 11 (July 1913): 218-24. 8 32nd Iowa Infantry Battle of Pleasant Hill, 218ff Casualties, 218 Taken prisoner and stripped by Confederates, 218-19 Many wounded in a ditch, 219 Wounded comrades, 220 Prison food, 221 Woman visited prison with food, 221-22 Food prices, 222 Paroled, wagons, 223 Alcohol for pain, 223 Patient shot through the head on trip down Red River, 224 New York lieutenant abused an Iowan and was kicked downstairs by a surgeon, 224 New Orleans, 224 Alley, Charles. “Excepts from the Civil War Diary of Lieutenant Charles Alley, Company ‘C,’ Fifth Iowa Cavalry.” Iowa Journal of History 49 (July 1951): 241-56. 5th Iowa Cavalry Woman patriotism, 242 Sabbath, 242-43 Methodist music, 243 Camp life, 243-44 Women in camp, 244 Religious services, 245 Escape from profane influence of camp, 245 Religion in camp, 246 Officer election, Christian soldiers, 247 Horses, 247 Dispute with Lieutenant Colonel, guardhouse, 248-49 Horse, 249-50 Officers, 250 Religious service, chaplain, 250 Swearing, 250 Sermon, 251 Fort Henry, 252 Fort Donelson, 253 Wounded soldiers, 253 Scouting, 253-54 Dysentery and diarrhea, 254 Skirmish, casualties, 255 Arp R.
Recommended publications
  • Record of the Organizations Engaged in the Campaign, Siege, And

    Record of the Organizations Engaged in the Campaign, Siege, And

    College ILttirarjj FROM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ' THROUGH £> VICKSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK COMMISSION. RECORD OF THE ORGANIZATIONS ENGAGED IN THE CAMPAIGN, SIEGE, AND DEFENSE OF VICKSBURG. COMPILED FROM THE OFFICIAL RECORDS BY jomsr s. KOUNTZ, SECRETARY AND HISTORIAN OF THE COMMISSION. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1901. PREFACE. The Vicksburg campaign opened March 29, 1863, with General Grant's order for the advance of General Osterhaus' division from Millikens Bend, and closed July 4^, 1863, with the surrender of Pem- berton's army and the city of Vicksburg. Its course was determined by General Grant's plan of campaign. This plan contemplated the march of his active army from Millikens Bend, La. , to a point on the river below Vicksburg, the running of the batteries at Vicksburg by a sufficient number of gunboats and transports, and the transfer of his army to the Mississippi side. These points were successfully accomplished and, May 1, the first battle of the campaign was fought near Port Gibson. Up to this time General Grant had contemplated the probability of uniting the army of General Banks with his. He then decided not to await the arrival of Banks, but to make the cam paign with his own army. May 12, at Raymond, Logan's division of Grant's army, with Crocker's division in reserve, was engaged with Gregg's brigade of Pemberton's army. Gregg was largely outnum bered and, after a stout fight, fell back to Jackson. The same day the left of Grant's army, under McClernand, skirmished at Fourteen- mile Creek with the cavalry and mounted infantry of Pemberton's army, supported by Bowen's division and two brigades of Loring's division.
  • James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg

    James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg

    “Such a night is seldom experienced…” James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg Karlton Smith, Gettysburg NMP After the repulse of Lt. Gen. James Longstreet’s Assault on July 3, 1863, Gen. Robert E. Lee, commanding the Army of Northern Virginia, knew that the only option left for him at Gettysburg was to try to disengage from his lines and return with his army to Virginia. Longstreet, commander of the army’s First Corps and Lee’s chief lieutenant, would play a significant role in this retrograde movement. As a preliminary to the general withdrawal, Longstreet decided to pull his troops back from the forward positions gained during the fighting on July 2. Lt. Col. G. Moxley Sorrel, Longstreet’s adjutant general, delivered the necessary orders to Maj. Gen. Lafayette McLaws, commanding one of Longstreet’s divisions. Sorrel offered to carry the order to Brig. Gen. Evander M. Law, commanding John B. Hood’s division, on McLaws’s right. McLaws raised objections to this order. He felt that his advanced position was important and “had been won after a deadly struggle; that the order was given no doubt because of [George] Pickett’s repulse, but as there was no pursuit there was no necessity of it.” Sorrel interrupted saying: “General, there is no discretion allowed, the order is for you to retire at once.” Gen. James Longstreet, C.S.A. (LOC) As McLaws’s forward line was withdrawing to Warfield and Seminary ridges, the Federal batteries on Little Round Top opened fire, “but by quickening the pace the aim was so disturbed that no damage was done.” McLaws’s line was followed by “clouds of skirmishers” from the Federal Army of the Potomac; however, after reinforcing his own skirmish line they were driven back from the Peach Orchard area.
  • 26Th Regiment Louisiana Infantry Muster Roll C

    26Th Regiment Louisiana Infantry Muster Roll C

    26th Regiment Louisiana Infantry Muster Roll C. S. A. Field and Staff: From The Story of the 26th Louisiana Infantry In the Service of The Confederate States By: Winchester Hall (Pages 151-230) FIELD: Alexander de Clouet. Elected Colonel April 8, 1862 Duncan S. Cage. Captain of Company H. Elected Lieutenant- Colonel April 5, 1862. Colonel by promotion November 10, 1862. Winchester Hall. Captain of Company I. Elected Major April 8, 1862. Lieutenant-Colonel by Promotion November 10, 1862. By promotion November 25, 1862. William C. Crow Captain of Company E. Major by Promotion November 25, 1862. Lieutenant Colonel by promotion November 25, 1862. W. Whitmel Martin. Captain of Company C. Major by Promotion November 25, 1862. Page 151 Cleophas Lagarde. Captain of Company D. Major by Promotion June 21, 1863.* Edward Pilsbury. Adjutant. Resigned during summer of 1862. John R. Bisland. Adjutant. Appointed during summer of 1862. L. E. Nee. Captain and Quartermaster. A. J. Moss. Private of Company A. Captain and Assistant Commissary of Subsistence. Afterward Commissary to Thomas’ Brigade. E. L. Lashbrook. Surgeon. Resigned December 18, 1862. Alfred Hall. Assistant Surgeon and Surgeon on Resignation of Surgeon Lashbrook. NON-COMMISSIONED STAFF. James Bryan Martin. Sergeant Major. Afterwards elected Junior Lieutenant of Company C, June 4, 1863. Acting Ordnance Officer and A. D. C. to Brigadier General Allen Thomas. Captain Company A. Weatherly’s Battalion of Sharp-shooters. John M. Knight. Sergeant of Company H. Succeeded Sergeant Major Martin on June 4, 1863. *Note- On promotion of Major Crow on Nov. 25, 1862, to Lieutenant and Colonel, Captain Lagarde was the ranking Captain, but declined promotion at the time.
  • Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: an Explanation and Case Study

    Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: an Explanation and Case Study

    Journal of Leadership Education Volume 11, Issue 1 – Winter 2012 Using the 5Ps Leadership Analysis to Examine the Battle of Antietam: An Explanation and Case Study Bradley Z. Hull, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Logistics Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Scott J. Allen, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Management Department of Management, Marketing, and Logistics John Carroll University University Heights, OH [email protected] Abstract The authors describe an exploratory analytical tool called The 5Ps Leadership Analysis (Personal Attributes, Position, Purpose, Practices/Processes, and Product) as a heuristic for better understanding the complexities of leadership. Using The 5Ps Leadership Analysis , the authors explore the leadership of General Robert E. Lee of the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia and General George B. McClellan of the Union Army of the Potomac—more specifically, the leadership of the two generals on September 17, 1862 during the Battle of Antietam. The paper concludes with suggestions for application in the classroom. Introduction This case study examines how two organizations compete and how two leaders can influence change and success given their resources. One organization is small and underfinanced with antiquated equipment. The other is large, well financed, and organized along traditional lines where each part of the organization operates autonomously and is coordinated by top levels of management. This type of confrontation between a small organization and a large competitor occurs often in American business. Two relevant examples might be Dell (in its early days) versus Compaq and Amazon.com (in its early days) versus Barnes and Noble or the now bankrupt Borders.
  • Jucftnmiul ^Isgatch. Vrwssrewh

    Jucftnmiul ^Isgatch. Vrwssrewh

    bpjeciaI/ > y-. ^ ^./.. i .< | "J . * with no respect what¬ to .. be cording his worth, J®"* jk/' ASTJUST RECEIVED and with a view to its recovery HORACE GREELEY'S TOUR. ever to color or condition. 7 FHmM 'idyou GOODS! NEW GOODS! paired, States succeeds there i« no SS?en°c?r [Appliiusc.] jar.NEW the appointment of United If otir Governmetit A ri'LX STOCK or accepted at HIS FIHST MPEECH I* KENTUCKY. there is no considerable faction, there Gr.dcy re- #* Ps . of Washington party, ctoseof bisspeecbMr. \_li_ *1 for the Territory or J '1 Marshal ^Attll! ^isgatch.w left in the field opposing y- ?rrJUcftnmiul and was poon is reilly nobody atniel cheers. t.; bands of President Pierce, on the common tired FALL JDRY GOODS, the Ter¬ RECEPTION AT LOUISVILLE. objei-tin# to their standing from that - & CO.. TL'ESDAV SEPTEMBER 24, 1872. elected a delegare to Congress of American nationality. [Ap¬ O'CoNOK AND THE STRAIGHT-OUTS- CARDOZO. FOVRQUREAN he settled platform their clcar in¬ CnABLES COMPRISING O.VR OF THE ritory. At the close of his term When 3Ir. Greeley arrived in Newport, plause.] I say, then, that it I* Two of the New York Republican papers of that State our Government shall be wel¬ hap POST-OFFICE Poli¬ in Florida, and was elected from Ky., Saturday, lie spoke as follows: terest that by the Saturday announce that Charles O'Conor 1009 MAIN STREETS OPPOSITE A Railroad Phase of Carpet-Bag wan a time. comed, and ratified, and approved letter to one of the BEsT ASSORTMENTS IN THE CITY.
  • The First Republican Army: the Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War

    The First Republican Army: the Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War

    Civil War Book Review Fall 2017 Article 14 The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War Zachery Fry Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr Recommended Citation Fry, Zachery (2017) "The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicalization Of The Civil War," Civil War Book Review: Vol. 19 : Iss. 4 . DOI: 10.31390/cwbr.19.4.19 Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cwbr/vol19/iss4/14 Fry: The First Republican Army: The Army Of Virginia And The Radicaliz Review Fry, Zachery Fall 2017 Matsui, John H. The First Republican Army: The Army of Virginia and the Radicalization of the Civil War. University of Virginia Press, $39.50 ISBN 9780813939278 John Pope, the Army of Virginia, and the Road to Hard War Civil War historians find the political motives behind Union squabbles in the Eastern Theater fascinating. Scholars and lay readers alike can count on a constant barrage of books on the high command of the Army of the Potomac, for instance, replete with well-worn accounts of backstabbing by George McClellan, Fitz John Porter, and Joseph Hooker. Over the past several years, however, a critical mass of innovative literature by young scholars such as Timothy Orr and Jonathan White has emerged to investigate the rich intersections of soldier ideology and command politics, adding to earlier pioneering work by historians such as John Hennessy. Instead of debating how many Union soldiers embraced emancipation, as scholars of the 1990s and early 2000s did, historians now want to know what that undeniable ideological divide meant for command and control.
  • Battle of Mobile Bay

    Battle of Mobile Bay

    CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM NY NY HistoricalSociety - dson PaintingbyDavi J.O. INTRODUCTION Students of the Civil War find no shortage of material regarding the battle of Mobile Bay. There are numerous stirring accounts of Farragut’s dramatic damning of the “torpedoes” and the guns of Fort Morgan, and of the gallant but futile resistance offered by the CSS Tennessee to the entire Union Fleet. These accounts range from the reminiscences of participants to the capably analyzed reappraisals by Centennial historians. It is particularly frustrating then, to find hardly any adequate description of the land campaign for Mobile in the general accounts of the War between the States. A few lines are usually deemed sufficient by historians to relate this campaign to reduce the last major confederate stronghold in the West, described as the best fortified city in the Confederacy by General Joseph E. Johnston, and which indeed did not fall until after General Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. It fell then to an attacking Federal force of some 45,000 troops, bolstered by a formidable siege train and by the support of the Federal Navy. Battles and Leaders of the Civil War, to give one example, devotes 33 well illustrated pages to the battle of Mobile Bay, but allows only one page for the land CONFEDERATE HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OF BELGIUM operations of 1865 ! The following account is written as a small contribution to the Civil War Centennial and is intended to provide a brief but reasonably comprehensive account of the campaign. Operations will from necessity be viewed frequently from the positions of the attacking Federal forces.
  • The Civil War

    The Civil War

    THE CIVIL WAR wounded in the shoulder and lost General George B. McClellan reliev- UNION GENERALS the use of his arm during the de- ing him of command of th Army of fense of Springfield. 3" x 1". Cut sig- the Potomac. 7 1/2" x 4". Signed Note. nature with rank. “E.B. Brown Brig. “Dear Shelton, I send you above, the Gen. Vols.” Fine. $150 - up only record on my books that will throw any light on the subject of your company’s acceptance - I pre- * 126 sume however that is sufficient. Re- HENRY L. ABBOTT (1842 - 1864). cruiting is going on very well and I think Ohio will come up to the mark Union Brevet Brigadier General, for * 131 without fail. Yours truly, C. P. gallant services in the battle of the JUDSON DAVID BINGHAM Buckingham, Adj. Genl. O.” Fine. Wilderness. Killed at Wilderness, Va (1831 - 1909). Union Bvt. Brigadier $200 - up on May 6, 1864. 8" x 2 1/2". Cut signa- General. 7" x 2". Signature cut from a ture with rank. “Very respectfully, larger typed document. “Very Re- Your obdt. Servant Henry L. Abbott spectfully, Your Obedient Servant, Lieut. Colonel of Engineers Com- J.D. Bingham, Deputy Quartermaster manding”. Tape residue at left and * 129 General, Brevet Brigadier General, upper left corner missing. Fine. JAMES A. BEAVER(1837-1914), U.S. Army.” Fine $35 - up $35 - up Union Brevet Brigadier-General dur- ing the Civil War, Governor of Penn- sylvania, Judge. TLS James A. Beaver * 134 1page, 8 ½” x 11”, dated Harrisburg, AMBROSE E.
  • William P. Anderson and 'The May Letters" 175

    William P. Anderson and 'The May Letters" 175

    W1LLIAM P. ANDERSON AND "THE MAY LETTERS" BY PATRICIA GIVI•S JOHNSON • Camp Springs, Ma•land The 1828 Presidential election campaign, when Andrew Jackson ran against John Quincy Adams, was one of the most acrid ever to convulse the electorate. The most controversial man yet nominated for the Presi- dency, Jackson had lived such a checkered life it was not difficult for the Adams faction to fuel their fires. Jackson was accused of everything from wife-stealing to murder. For a man who had feuded and quarreled over these issues all his adult life, these accusations were not new nor unexpected. Besides, though there was much talk, most of the oppo- sition's accusations could not be proven. The Arbuthnot and Ambrister executions in Florida were viewed by the common people as necessary actions of a military commander in wartime. Rachel Jackson's pure character and the Jacksons' abiding love in a good marriage had laid to rest the old marriage slanders. In a time when dueling was respectable and still practiced, the Charles Dickinson Duel was viewed by most voters as a matter of honor. However, there had been whispers about that duel and how honor- able Jackson had really been. The Whigs believed if the whispers could be proven they would have found their opponent's Achilles heel. But they needed some proof that Jackson had acted dishonorably in the duel which cost Dickinson his life. This proof was forthcoming when a Tennessee Whig, William P. Anderson of Nashville, formerly Jackson's friend, stepped forward with letters which indicated Jackson had acted dishonorably in the duel.
  • Hanover Courthouse: the Nionu 'S Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure Jerry Joseph Coggeshall Old Dominion University

    Hanover Courthouse: the Nionu 'S Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure Jerry Joseph Coggeshall Old Dominion University

    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Winter 1999 Hanover Courthouse: The nionU 's Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure Jerry Joseph Coggeshall Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Coggeshall, Jerry J.. "Hanover Courthouse: The nionU 's Tactical Victory and Strategic Failure" (1999). Master of Arts (MA), thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/f9k9-0564 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HANOVER COURTHOUSE: THE UNION'S TACTICAL VICTORY AND STRATEGIC FAILURE by Jerry Joseph Coggeshail B.A. May 1997, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY December 1999 Harold S. Wilson (Director) Annecce nnie Sweeneys Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number 1398157 Copyright 2000 by Coggeshall, Jerry Joseph All rights reserved. UMI__ ® UMI Microform 1398157 Copyright 2000 by Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
  • The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The

    The Pennsylvania State University the Graduate School College of The

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts CITIES AT WAR: UNION ARMY MOBILIZATION IN THE URBAN NORTHEAST, 1861-1865 A Dissertation in History by Timothy Justin Orr © 2010 Timothy Justin Orr Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2010 The dissertation of Timothy Justin Orr was reviewed and approved* by the following: Carol Reardon Professor of Military History Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Director of Graduate Studies in History Mark E. Neely, Jr. McCabe-Greer Professor in the American Civil War Era Matthew J. Restall Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Colonial Latin American History, Anthropology, and Women‘s Studies Carla J. Mulford Associate Professor of English *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School ii ABSTRACT During the four years of the American Civil War, the twenty-three states that comprised the Union initiated one of the most unprecedented social transformations in U.S. History, mobilizing the Union Army. Strangely, scholars have yet to explore Civil War mobilization in a comprehensive way. Mobilization was a multi-tiered process whereby local communities organized, officered, armed, equipped, and fed soldiers before sending them to the front. It was a four-year progression that required the simultaneous participation of legislative action, military administration, benevolent voluntarism, and industrial productivity to function properly. Perhaps more than any other area of the North, cities most dramatically felt the affects of this transition to war. Generally, scholars have given areas of the urban North low marks. Statistics refute pessimistic conclusions; northern cities appeared to provide a higher percentage than the North as a whole.
  • CIVIL WAR on the WEB

    CIVIL WAR on the WEB

    THE CIVIL WAR on the WEB THE CIVIL WAR on the WEB A GUIDE TO THE VERY BEST SITES Completely Revised and Updated ALICE E. CARTER & RICHARD JENSEN Foreword by Gary W. Gallagher New Introduction by John C. Waugh © 2003 by Scholarly Resources Inc. All rights reserved First published 2003 Printed and bound in the United States of America Scholarly Resources Inc. 104 Greenhill Avenue Wilmington, DE 19805–1897 www.scholarly.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carter, Alice E., 1964— The Civil War on the Web : a guide to the very best sites / Alice E. Carter & Richard Jensen ; foreword by Gary W. Gallagher and new introduction by John C. Waugh. — Rev. & updated. p. cm. Rev. and updated ed. of: The Civil War on the Web / William G. Thomas, Alice E. Carter. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8420-5134-1 (alk. paper) — ISBN 0-8420-5135-X (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. United States—History—Civil War, 1861–1865—Computer network resources—Directories. 2. Web sites—Directories. I. Jensen, Richard J. II. Thomas, William G., 1964– Civil War on the Web. III. Title. E468.9 .C35 2003 025.06'9737—dc21 2003009604 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for permanence of paper for printed library mate- rials, Z39.48, 1984. A CKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank Will Thomas, who co-authored the first edition and who developed the book’s organization and focus. Will’s scholarship, leadership, and innovation in putting history on the web have made the Internet a better place.