DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Revitalization: Public Toilet Alternatives for the East Village and the Downtown

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Revitalization: Public Toilet Alternatives for the East Village and the Downtown 2005 December 31 Urban Revitalization: Public Toilet Alternatives for the East Village and the Downtown Researcher: Iris Li © M. Stellmach Urban Revitalization: Public Toilet Alternatives for the East Village and the Downtown Page 1 of 40 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Why is the provision of public toilets crucial?......................................................................................... 3 1.2 What is the public toilet situation in the East Village? ............................................................................ 5 2.0 Report Objectives and Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Objectives...................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Resources...................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Case Studies ................................................................................................................................................. 9 2.3.1 The Case of Vancouver................................................................................................................ 10 3.0 Public Toilet Alternatives ........................................................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Short Term: Street Cleaning ..................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.1 Definition...................................................................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Practices in Various Cities........................................................................................................... 11 3.1.3 Advantages ................................................................................................................................. 12 3.1.4 Disadvantages and Issues .......................................................................................................... 12 3.1.5 Cost and Financing ..................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.6 Additional Resources .................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Short Term: Portable Toilets ................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.1 Definition...................................................................................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Practices in Various Cities........................................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Advantages ................................................................................................................................. 15 3.2.4 Disadvantages and Issues.......................................................................................................... 15 3.2.5 Cost and Financing ..................................................................................................................... 16 3.2.6 Additional Resources .................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Mid Term: Hotel Facilities ........................................................................................................................ 17 3.3.1 Definition...................................................................................................................................... 17 3.3.2 Practices in Various Cities........................................................................................................... 17 3.3.3 Advantages ................................................................................................................................. 18 3.3.4 Disadvantages and Issues.......................................................................................................... 18 3.3.5 Cost and Financing ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.3.6 Additional Resources .................................................................................................................. 18 3.4 Long Term: Supervised Public Toilets ................................................................................................... 19 3.4.1 Definition...................................................................................................................................... 19 3.4.2 Practices in Various Cities........................................................................................................... 19 3.4.3 Advantages ................................................................................................................................. 21 3.4.4 Disadvantages and Issues.......................................................................................................... 22 3.4.5 Cost and Financing ..................................................................................................................... 22 3.4.6 Additional Resources .................................................................................................................. 23 3.5 Long Term: Hygiene Centers/Toilet Palaces ......................................................................................... 24 3.5.1 Definition...................................................................................................................................... 24 3.5.2 Practices in Various Cities........................................................................................................... 24 3.5.3 Advantages ................................................................................................................................. 25 3.5.4 Disadvantages and Issues .......................................................................................................... 26 3.5.5 Cost and Funding ........................................................................................................................ 26 3.5.6 Additional Resources .................................................................................................................. 27 3.6 Long Term: Automatic Public Toilets (APTs) ........................................................................................ 28 3.6.1 Definition...................................................................................................................................... 28 3.6.2 Practices in Various Cities........................................................................................................... 28 3.6.3 Advantages ................................................................................................................................. 29 3.6.4 Disadvantages and Issues.......................................................................................................... 29 3.6.5 Cost and Financing ..................................................................................................................... 30 3.6.6 Additional Resources .................................................................................................................. 31 3.7 Long Term: The UriLift ............................................................................................................................. 32 3.7.1 Definition...................................................................................................................................... 32 3.7.2 Practices in Various Cities........................................................................................................... 32 3.7.3 Advantages .................................................................................................................................. 33 3.7.4 Disadvantages and Issues........................................................................................................... 33 3.7.5 Cost and Financing ...................................................................................................................... 33 3.7.6 Additional Resources ................................................................................................................... 34 4.0 Conclusion................................................................................................................................................................ 35 5.0 Sources Cited…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………36 6.0 Summary Table of Public Toilet Alternatives…………………………………………………………………………...40 Urban Revitalization: Public Toilet Alternatives for the East Village and the Downtown Page 2 of 40 Page 2 o 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Why is the provision of public toilets crucial? There is a noticeable shortage of public toilets in major Canadian cities and Calgary is no exception. This presents a particularly dire situation for homeless populations who a. may otherwise face discrimination
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TBN #19 Become Shower Cubicles
    Urban WASH Lessons Learned from Post- Earthquake Response in Haiti Large-scale urban WASH programming requires different approaches to those normally employed in Oxfam emergency response activities. This paper examines the lessons learned from the WASH response to the Haiti earthquake in January 2010. The paper also gives practical case studies of some of the success and failures from the WASH activities, undertaken in a very high-density urban/peri-urban context. Introduction Oxfam’s WASH response At the height of the emergency response, Oxfam GB was The main WASH activities undertaken in the earthquake supporting 149,613 people1 with water, sanitation and response in Port-au-Prince included: hygiene promotion in more than 46 sites in the Port-au- Water trucking & distribution Prince area. 18 Camps had populations greater than Water system rehabilitation & community 1,000 people, while the largest camp, Petionville Golf management Course, had a population in excess of 50,000 people. The smallest site, Santo 14-B had a population of 482. On-site sanitation and excreta management Waste collection & removal Location # Project Sites Population Debris collection, removal and processing Delmas 14 67,425 Community mobilisation Carrefour 14 38,718 Hygiene promotion & NFI Distributions Institutional support to the WASH sector Carrefour Feuilles 5 7,950 This has been achieved through a variety of approaches, Croix de Bouquet 11 26,320 including direct implementation through Oxfam teams, working through partners (both INGOs and national Corail 2 9,200 NGOs), and through direct support to the national WASH institutions and the WASH Cluster. Many areas, such as Carrefour Feuilles, Carrefour and Delmas, lack any formal urban planning process and have Oxfam has created a number of innovative relationships high population densities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the New Alchemists 3
    Journal of the New Alchemists 3 Table of Contents NEW ALCHEMY Looking Back - Na ncy jack Todd 7 The Trash Fish Cook Book - Bill McLarney and Bryce Butler 15 ENERGY An Advanced Sail-Wing for Water-Pumping Windmills - Earle Barnhart 25 Savonius Rotor - Earle Barnhart 27 Solar Collector for Heating Water - Earle Barnhart 30 Earth Breath : Wind Power -jim Bukey 32 LAND AND ITS USE An Ark for Prince Edward Island -john Todd 41 The Shape of Things to Come: The Architects' View - Ole Hammarlund and David Bergmark 44 Confessions of a Novice Compostor - Tyro ne Cashman 45 Our Gardens... and Our Rabbits - Hilde Atema Maingay 48 Further Experiments in the Irrigation of Garden Vegetables with Fertile Fish Pond Water - William 0. McLarney 53 The World in Miniature - John Todd 54 AQUACULTURE Midge Culture - William 0. McLarney, joseph S. Levine and Marcus M. Sherman 80 A New Low - Cost Method of Sealing Fish Pond Bottoms- William 0. McLarney and ]. Robert Hu nter 85 Cultivo Experimental de Peces en Estanques - Anibal Pa tino R. 86 EXPLORATIONS Populist Manifesto .... for Poets with Love - Lawrenc,e Ferlinghetti 94 Meditation on the Dark Ages, Past and Present - William Irwin Thompson 96 Self-Health: Exploring Alternatives in Personal Health Services -Nancy Milia, Ruth Hubbard 102 Women and Ecology - Nancy ja ck Todd 107 .. · . : f ; �--... .. · . : · · · . .. · . · · . 0 'H:., i,�··®: · . ·�· i/i... ' to Restnre the lands, Protect t;he Seas, And Inform "Gho Eart"h8 SreCJIU'ds The New Alchemy Institute is a small, international organization fo r research and education on behalf of humanity and the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Faecal Sludge Management in Eight Southern and East African Countries
    THE STATUS OF FAECAL SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IN EIGHT SOUTHERN AND EAST AFRICAN COUNTRIES May 2015 Prepared for the Sanitation Research Fund for Africa (SRFA) Project of the Water Research Commission and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation WRC Report No. KV 340/15 ISBN 978-1-4312-0685-8 THE STATUS OF FAECAL SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IN EIGHT SOUTHERN AND EAST AFRICAN COUNTRIES DISCLAIMER This report was compiled from country reports submitted by research teams involved in the Sanitation Research Fund for Africa (SRFA) Project. This report has been reviewed by the Water Research Commission (WRC) and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the WRC nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Further, the WRC, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the service provider take no responsibility for any inaccuracies or undisclosed sources from these country reports. © Water Research Commission 191 Anderson Street Northcliff 2195 Tel: 27 (0) 11 476 5915 Fax: 0866498600 Cell number: 27 (0)834606832 E-mail: [email protected] The publication of this report emanates from a project entitled The Status of Faecal Sludge Management in Eight Southern and East African Countries (WRC Report No. K8/1100/11) WRC Report No. KV 340/15 ISBN 978-1-4312-0685-8 01 THE STATUS OF FAECAL SLUDGE MANAGEMENT IN EIGHT SOUTHERN AND EAST AFRICAN COUNTRIES Executive Summary Background Sub-Saharan Africa still lags behind in achieving the Millennium Development Goals for sanitation. In 2012, 644 million people in sub-Saharan Africa, that is 70% of the population, used an unimproved toilet facility or resorted to open defecation (WHO/UNICEF, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Menstrual Hygiene Products Should Be Provided for Free in Restrooms
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 73 Number 1 Fall 2018 Article 10 10-30-2018 The Bring Your Own Tampon Policy: Why Menstrual Hygiene Products Should Be Provided for Free in Restrooms Elizabeth Montano Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the Human Rights Law Commons Recommended Citation Elizabeth Montano, The Bring Your Own Tampon Policy: Why Menstrual Hygiene Products Should Be Provided for Free in Restrooms, 73 U. Miami L. Rev. 370 (2018) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol73/iss1/10 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Bring Your Own Tampon Policy: Why Menstrual Hygiene Products Should Be Provided for Free in Restrooms ELIZABETH MONTANO* Like toilet paper, menstrual hygiene products,1 such as tampons and pads, are necessities for managing natural and unavoidable bodily functions. However, menstrual hygiene products widely receive separate treatment in restrooms across the globe. While it would be absurd today to carry a roll of toilet paper at all times, it is considered necessary and common sense for all menstruators to carry menstrual hy- giene products at all times, for approximately forty years, in case of an emergency. This is the “Bring Your Own * Editor-in-Chief, University of Miami Law Review, Volume 73; J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • ACCESS and BEHAVIORAL OUTCOME INDICATORS for WATER, SANITATION, and HYGIENE I
    ACCESS AND BEHAVIORAL OUTCOME INDICATORS FOR WATER, SANITATION, AND HYGIENE February 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Orlando Hernandez with support from Scott Tobias under the USAID Hygiene Improvement Project through the Academy for Educational Development. The USAID Hygiene Improvement Project (HIP) is a six-year (2004-2010) project funded by the USAID Bureau for Global Health, Office of Health, Infectious Diseases and Nutrition, led by the Academy for Educational Development (contract # GHS-I-00-04-00024-00) in partnership with ARD Inc., the IRC International Water and Sanitation Centre, and the Manoff Group. HIP aims to reduce diarrheal disease prevalence through the promotion of key hygiene improvement practices, such as hand washing with soap, safe disposal of feces, and safe storage and treatment of drinking water at the household level. Contact Information: USAID Hygiene Improvement Project Academy for Educational Development 1825 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009-5721 Tel. 202-884-8000; Fax: 202-884-8454 [email protected] - www.hip.watsan.net Submitted to: Merri Weinger Office of Health, Infectious Diseases and Nutrition Bureau for Global Health U.S. Agency for International Development Washington, DC 20523 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................ i GLOSSARY ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mercurian
    The Mercurian : : A Theatrical Translation Review Volume 7, Number 3 (Spring 2019) Editor: Adam Versényi Editorial Assistant: Sarah Booker ISSN: 2160-3316 The Mercurian is named for Mercury who, if he had known it, was/is the patron god of theatrical translators, those intrepid souls possessed of eloquence, feats of skill, messengers not between the gods but between cultures, traders in images, nimble and dexterous linguistic thieves. Like the metal mercury, theatrical translators are capable of absorbing other metals, forming amalgams. As in ancient chemistry, the mercurian is one of the five elementary “principles” of which all material substances are compounded, otherwise known as “spirit.” The theatrical translator is sprightly, lively, potentially volatile, sometimes inconstant, witty, an ideal guide or conductor on the road. The Mercurian publishes translations of plays and performance pieces from any language into English. The Mercurian also welcomes theoretical pieces about theatrical translation, rants, manifestos, and position papers pertaining to translation for the theatre, as well as production histories of theatrical translations. Submissions should be sent to: Adam Versényi at [email protected] or by snail mail: Adam Versényi, Department of Dramatic Art, CB# 3230, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3230. For translations of plays or performance pieces, unless the material is in the public domain, please send proof of permission to translate from the playwright or original creator of the piece. Since one of the primary objects of The Mercurian is to move translated pieces into production, no translations of plays or performance pieces will be published unless the translator can certify that he/she has had an opportunity to hear the translation performed in either a reading or another production-oriented venue.
    [Show full text]
  • Dbkl Toilets
    SANITARY MAINTENANCE AND BUILDING AWARENESS AMONG THE RESIDENTS FOR TOILETS IN KUALA LUMPUR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT CITY HALL OF KUALA LUMPUR CONTENTS HISTORY TOILET ETHICS TYPES OF TOILET TOILET ISSUES CATEGORY OF TOILET TOILET EDUCATION TOILET FEATURES LAW AND ENFORCEMENT TOILET ACCESSORIES STAR RATING ADVANCED FEATURES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT CITY HALL OF KUALA LUMPUR BUCKET TOILETS FLUSHING PIT TOILETS TOILETS SQUAT OVER BIDET FLOWING TOILETS WATER HISTORY MOBILE DISABLE TOILETS OF TOILETS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT CITY HALL OF KUALA LUMPUR CATEGORY OF TOILETS PUBLIC FACILITIES DBKL PUBLIC (COMMUNITY HALL /SPORT RECREATIONAL TOILETS COMPLEX/ MARKET/FOOD PARKS COURT/HAWKER CENTRE) TRANSPORTATION RESTORAN AND SHOPPING HUB (LRT/ BUS/ FOOD OUTLET COMPLEXES TRAIN) PLACE OF PETROL STATION WORSHIP DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT TOILET FEATURES CITY HALL OF KUALA LUMPUR MALE TOILET WITH URINALS FEMALE TOILET WITH PRIVACY – CLOSED DOORS SANITARY BIN SYMBOLS – MALE , FEMALE BABY CARE ROOM AND DISABLE DIRECTION, PAY TOILET DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT TOILET ACCESSORIES CITY HALL OF KUALA LUMPUR TOILET TISSUE HAND DRYER SOAP DISPENSER WASTE BIN SANITARY BIN HAND DRYER, TISSUE & HOOK – FOR WASTE BIN HANDBAGS SINK , SOAP DISPENSOR & DECOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT CITY HALL OF KUALA LUMPUR BIDET THAT SQUIRTS WATER – POSTERIOR AND ANTERIOR WASH SENSOR SOAP ADVANCED SENSOR HAND DISPENSOR FEATURES ROLL TOWEL SENSOR TAP/FLUSH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT TOILET ETHICS CITY
    [Show full text]
  • The Provision of Public Toilets
    House of Commons Communities and Local Government The Provision of Public Toilets Twelfth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 October 2008 HC 636 Published on 22 October 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Communities and Local Government Committee The Communities and Local Government Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Communities and Local Government and its associated bodies. Current membership Dr Phyllis Starkey MP (Labour, Milton Keynes South West) (Chair) Sir Paul Beresford MP (Conservative, Mole Valley) Mr Clive Betts MP (Labour, Sheffield Attercliffe) John Cummings MP (Labour, Easington) Jim Dobbin MP (Labour Co-op, Heywood and Middleton) Andrew George MP (Liberal Democrat, St Ives) Mr Greg Hands MP (Conservative, Hammersmith and Fulham) Anne Main MP (Conservative, St Albans) Mr Bill Olner MP (Labour, Nuneaton) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Emily Thornberry MP (Labour, Islington South and Finsbury) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/clgcom Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Huw Yardley (Clerk of the Committee), David Weir (Second Clerk), Andrew Griffiths (Second Clerk), Sara Turnbull (Inquiry Manager), Josephine Willows (Inquiry Manager), Clare Genis (Committee Assistant), Gabrielle Henderson (Senior Office Clerk), Nicola McCoy (Secretary) and Laura Kibby (Select Committee Media Officer).
    [Show full text]
  • Toilets As a Feminist Issue: a True Story
    University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law Faculty Scholarship Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty 1991 Toilets as a Feminist Issue: A True Story Taunya Lovell Banks University of Maryland School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Human Rights Law Commons Digital Commons Citation Banks, Taunya Lovell, "Toilets as a Feminist Issue: A True Story" (1991). Faculty Scholarship. 334. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/334 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Francis King Carey School of Law Faculty at DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UM Carey Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Toilets as a Feminist Issue~ A1 True Story Yaunya Lovell Bankst THE EsSAY1 One can measure the degree of equality between the sexes in America by its public toilets. As a child growing up, I remember that most public toilets for women had pay stalls. It often cost a nickel or even a dime to relieve yourself in a public toilet. There may have been one or even two free stalls, but they often were filthy and usually lacked toilet tissue. Comparing notes with a male contemporary, I was surprised to learn that there were pay stalls in the men's bathroom, but the urinals were free. Thus, women were penalized because no one had created the "feminine" equivalent of a urinal.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Demand for Sanitation a 2015 Portfolio Update and Overview Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Strategy
    Building Demand for Sanitation A 2015 Portfolio Update and Overview Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Strategy June 2015 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to thank all participants for their Water Institute at UNC, Steven Sugden from active engagement during the workshop as well as Water for People, Daniel Asamani from PLAN for their contributions to this report in the months International, Maria Laura Alzua from University following the Hanoi meeting. A special word of thanks of La Plata and Radu Ban of the Bill & Melinda to the staff of East Meets West (EMW, now Thrive Gates Foundation. Networks), the World Bank Water and Sanitation Program (WSP) and the National University of Civil A special thanks to Dr. Viet Anh from Hanoi Engineering for their assistance with organizing field University for taking care of government liaison as trips and other local preparations: well as arranging field visit permits and visitor visas. Quang Vinh Nguyen, Country Coordinator WSP Also many thanks to Sarah Herr from the Bill Vietnam & Melinda Gates Foundation for travel and logistical support throughout the workshop (not Hang Diem Nguyen, WSP Vietnam to mention the period leading up to it). Hoa Thi Hoang, World Bank Vietnam Minh Chau Nguyen, EMW Vietnam Overall organization and facilitation was in the Hanh Nguyen, EMW Vietnam capable hands of Pete Cranston and Pippa Scott, with remote support from Nancy White. Dang Thi Thanh Huyen, National University of Civil Engineering, Vietnam Peter Feldman tirelessly supported the organization and documentation of the workshop; This year as in previous years, many participants he drafted the program, engaged and corresponded took on a presentation or facilitation role and we with participants and wrote the first drafts of this are grateful to: Ada Oko-Williams from WaterAid, report.
    [Show full text]
  • Toilets As a Feminist Issue a Thue Story Taumya Loveli Bankst
    Toilets as a Feminist Issue A Thue Story Taumya Loveli Bankst THE ESSAY 1 One can measure the degree of equality between the sexes in America by its public toilets. As a child growing up, I remember that most public toilets for women had pay stalls It often cost a nickel or even a dime to relieve yourself in a public toilet. There may have been one or even two free stalls, but they often were filthy and usually lacked toilet tissue. Comparing notes with a male contemporary, I was surprised to learn that there were pay stalls in the men's bathroom, but the urinals were free. Thus, women were penalized because no one had created the 'feminine" equivalent of a urinal.2 If women ventured outside the home and were forced by circumstances to relieve themselves, they had to keep nickels, dimes, and tissue handy. The situation was even worse for women of color t Professor of Law, University of Maryland. I would like to thank Marley Weiss, Mary Coombs, Kathy Abrams, Regina Austin, and Jana Singer for their comments and suggestions on earlier drafts of this article. I also want to thank Robin West, Judy Scales-Trent, Mar Matsuda, Patricia Williams, Lani Guinier, and many others who read earlier drafts, for their words of support and encouragement. I am especially grateful to Richard Delgado, who first thought my initial article worth publishing. Of course, I take full responsibility for the con- tent, shape, and direction of this article, so only my professional reputation is on the line.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Policy Analysis of Public Toilet Provision Initiatives in North American Cities: Recommendations for the Creation
    A Comparative Policy Analysis of Public Toilet Provision Initiatives in North American Cities: Recommendations for the Creation of a Public Toilet Strategy in Toronto Rhonda Cheryl Solomon Research Paper 225 Cities Centre, University of Toronto June, 2013 ISSN 0316-0068; ISBN-13 978-0-7727-1484-8 Funded by the Undergraduate Research Fund of the Arts and Science Students' Union and Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto Cities Centre • University of Toronto ii A Comparative Policy Analysis of Public Toilet Provision Initiatives in North American Cities: Recommendations for the Creation of a Public Toilet Strategy in Toronto Rhonda Cheryl Solomon Research Paper 225 June 2013, vi, 53 pp. ISSN 0316-0068 ISBN-13 978-0-7727-1484-8 Cities Centre University of Toronto 455 Spadina Avenue, 4th floor Toronto M5S 2G8 Canada Telephone: 416-978-2072 Fax 416-978-7162 E-mail: mailto:[email protected] Website: http://www.citiescentre.utoronto.ca The opinions expressed in this or any paper published by Cities Centre (formerly the Centre for Urban and Community Studies) do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre, or those of the University of Toronto. Cities Centre • University of Toronto iii Executive Summary If you want to understand a culture, look to its lavatories. (cited in Beard, 2013, n.p.) This study investigates the provision of public toilets in seven North American cities (Toronto, ON; Calgary, AB; Portland, OR; Seattle, WA; Vancouver, BC; Edmonton, AB; and Denver, CO) in order to understand the factors that support or hinder public toilet provision and to develop recommendations for the creation of a public toilet strategy in Toronto.
    [Show full text]