Report on the Properties

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Properties GM 15663 REPORT ON THE PROPERTIES REPORT ON THE PROPERTIES of FAB METAL MINES LIMITED by Lionel R. Simard, M.Sc., P. Eng. :4.*râi..s ~ ~eâNC:rAUX Na / d b 4.„ Toronto, Ontario 1 November 20, 1964 i ~~~ ~.,..~ t ~ -1 ,~ ; REPORT ON THE PROPERTIES of FAB METAL MINES LIMITED INTRODUCTION The Company holds title to mining properties located as follows: Ontario 1. Cardiff Township Quebec 2. Urban Township - Three Properties "A", "B" and "C" ~ 3. Carpiquet Township 4.. Barry Township New Brunswick 5. Parish of Bathurst, County of Gloucester. 6. Otter Lake, County of Gloucester The character, extent and condition of surface exploration and development of each are described below. No surface plant or equipment is present on any of these properties. There has been no underground exploration or development (except diamond drilling from surface, where mentioned) and no underground plant or equipment is present on any of the properties During 1964 work was done on the Barry Township property and on the New Brunswick property in the Parish of Bathurst. Exploration work was carried out in the general area of Urban, Carpiquet and Barry Townships in Quebec. The company has acquired claims as a result of this work. 1. ONTAR:LO - CARDIFF TOWNSHIP PROPERTY The company holds mining rights on eight surveyed and patented mining claims numbered .company to E0-6210, E0-7945, E0-7946, EO-6214 and E0-6215. The first six claims form a contiguous group and are largely covered by the waters of Paudash Lake. Claims EO-6214 and 6215 lie to the east of the previous group and are one claim removed. In addition the company holds title to both surface and mineral rights on the east one-half of lot 10, concession 4, Cardiff Township, containing approximately 40 acres. LOCATION, ACCESS, ETC. The property lies some 40 miles northeasterly from the City of Peterborough. It is easily reached from paved highway No. 28, which passes within 2 miles of the claim group, by secondary roads which traverse the claim group. The town of Bancroft is situated about 14 miles to the northeast of the property on highway No. 28. The claims adjoin to the south and east of the property of Bicroft Uranium Mines Limited which bas been a substantial producer of uranium oxides for the past four and a half years. This property is now the Bicroft Division of Macassa Gold Mines Limited. Topographical relief is rather low. There are a number of cleared fields scattered over the eastern area of the claims. Paudash Lake covers a large portion of the western half of the property. The land portion of the property has been generally cleared of timber. PREVIOUS WORK The economic potential of the property has been investigated by geological mapping, a geiger counter survey of all outcrop areas and by two diamond drill holes totalling 1,833 feet of drilling. GEOLOGY The area is underlain with biotite hornblende and granite gneisses and crys- talline limestone dolomite and greywacke and intruded with stocks and dykes of granite, syenite and gabbro. The consolidated rocks which outcrop on the eastern half of the property are composed of an assemblage of paragneisses including crystalline limestone, dolomite, greywacke and biotite gneiss. These have been intruded by small dykes of pink granite. The western portion of the property is covered by a part of Paudash Lake. The east half of lot 10, concession 4, is underlain by sedimentary gneisses. There are no known radioactive occurrences on the property and there is no recorded program of exploratory work. - 2 ECONOMIC GEOLOGY Deposits of radioactive minerals including those of uranium, thorium and rare earths have been located in several places in the area. These are contained in pegmatite-like dykes usually located in the gneissic formations between the intrusive granites and the Precambrian limestone series. A substantial production of uranium oxides was obtained from three deposits in the area. Production has now ceased. A number of pink granite dykes mapped on the property in 1953 were found to be slightly radioactive. In the northern part of the property, on claim E0-7945, two drill holes were completed early in 1951+ to attempt to reach the Bicroft Uranium Mines Ltd. ore zone on the assumed projection of its southerly strike projection and easterly dip. In hole No. 1 this zone or a similar one was entered at 598 feet below sur- face and in hole No. 2 at 783 feet below surface. Neither hole was continued to reach the footwafl of the zone. The best assays encountered were in hole No. 1 and are recorded as follows: Vertical Depth (ft) Core Length (ft) % U308 817 1+.8 0.013 835 2.1+ 0.039 CONCLUSIONS • It seems probable that a geological horizon within which are found intrusive dykes containing radioactive minerals, enters the northwesterly part of the property at a depth of several hundred feet below surface. It has not been determined whether this represents the projection to the south of the Bicroft ore zone. However, there is a marked similarity between the characteristics of r,his zone and the one in which the Bicroft ore deposits occur. Any future effort to explore the property for deposits of radioactive minerals should be concentrated on the favorable horizon already indicated by previous diamond drilling. RECOMMENDATIONS Inasmuch as the future market for Canadian uranium production is considered uncertain at this time, it is recommended that no expenditures be made on the property, other than those required to retain title to the mining claims. How- ever, if the situation is clarified at some future date, in favor of new or increased production of uranium oxides, then some consideration should be given to additional diamond drilling on the property. 0 2. QUEBEC - URBAN TOWNSHIP - PROPERTY "A" PROPERTY The property of Fab Metal Mines Limited consists of seven (7) unpatented mining claims numbered as follows: Certificate Claims Registered No. i /~ -lC.~ - ~ .s 14'6-599- 1 A-285202 2 A-285203 ..,, g_ c ,S 178208 ,R 1 3 4 u 5 These claims are unsurveyed and may be oversize, possibly with an area of 400 acres. LOCATION, ACCESS, ETC. The ;property is located in the west central part of Urban Township, County of Abitibi East, Province of Quebec. The Penache and Macho rivers junction and flaw through the property. • The best means of access to the property is by aircraft based at Senneterre, Quebec. Numerous lakes and rivers near and on the property afford many landing bases for bush aircraft. TOPOGRAPHY AND PHYSIOGRAPHY The surface of the property is quite flat, broken only by a few low hills that seldom reach elevations of 75 feet above the swamp and muskeg. Bedrock exposures are scarce. GEOLOGY The consolidated rocks in the immediate area are all Precambrian in age. They consist of Keewatin type intermediate to basic lavas, cut by minor basic intrusives. The strike of the rocks is generally east west with dips from 40 to 80 degrees to the south. Regionally the rocks have been closely folded, forming a large synclinorium, flanked by acid intrusives and gneissic derivatives. A regional fault, paralleling the Macho river lineament, passes near the • western limits of the property. 4 ECONOMIC GEOLOGY Up to the present time, gold is the only metal that has been found in any quantity in the area. It usually occurs in quartz veins and mineralized shear zones. In the latter type, pyrite with lesser amounts of pyrrhotite and chalco- pyrite and other sulphides are generally disseminated throughout the rocks in these zones. In the past, it can be stated that the covering mantle of overburden has prevented any systematic search for both gold and base metal deposits. Advanced instrumentation of geophysical methods affords a new approach to such overburdened areas. PREVIOUS WORK In November 1958 an aerial electromagnetic survey was conducted over the two northerly claims of the property as presently constituted. The results of this work indicated two relatively weak anomalous zones. In 1959 the northern claims were included in widely spaced ground magnetic profiles and helicopter electromagnetic surveys. In 1960 an electromagnetic survey was conducted which included claims No. 1 and 2 of Certificate 146559: This work consisted of a reconnaissance type electromagnetic survey. Pace and compass traverses were conducted from a cut and picketted base line. These traverses were run at right angles to the base line at intervals varying from 300 to 1150 feet. Additionally, some magnetic work was done on claim 2, Certificate 146559 An electromagnetic anomaly was outlined trending across the southern part of claim 2, Certificate 146559.1 It strikes N600E, astronomic, varies in width and exhibits ratios of the order of 0.5 to 0.6 of the in-phase to out-of-phase components of the secondary field. These ratios are a measure of the conductivity of the conductor and in this instance are diagnostic of a poorly conductive body. The anomaly was investigated by 815 feet of diamond drilling in three holes. The holes all cut an interbanded sequence of rhyolite, rhyolite porphyry, quartz porphyry and tuffs. The tuffs are well bedded, graphitic and contain disseminated pyrite and pyrrhotite. A few grains of chalcopyrite were noted in one hole. Extensive sampling of the core returned assays of from nil and trace in gold and silver to highs of 0.06 ozs. in gold and 0.10 ozs. in silver per ton. From these results it is concluded that the E.M. anomalous zone, which is coincident with the resistivity anomaly, is caused by well bedded tuffs, partly graphitic and carrying pyrite-pyrrhotite sulphide mineralization.
Recommended publications
  • Algonquins of Ontario
    Algonquins of Ontario Friday, October 11, 2019 Changes to the 2019 – 2020 Algonquin Park Harvest Area Pembroke, ON – For many years, the annual Algonquins of Ontario harvest of moose, deer and elk has been managed pursuant to management plans developed by the Algonquin Negotiation Representatives (ANRs). These management plans establish the process of issuing tags to eligible Algonquin harvesters, the species that can be harvested, the season during which harvesting shall occur and the Harvest Area within which harvesting may take place. They also provide for reporting and monitoring of harvesting activities. These management plans have resulted in responsible and well-managed Algonquin harvesting for many years. In the past, Algonquin harvesting of moose and deer as well as the harvesting of other species of game normally taken for food in Algonquin Park has been restricted to the area within Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) 51 and to the east of Shirley Lake Road. For the 2019-2020 harvest season, the Algonquins of Ontario have decided that this area is now expanded to include that portion of Algonquin Park that lies within WMU 51, both east and west of Shirley Lake Road, north of the Hwy 60 Corridor Development Zone and within the Algonquin of Ontario Settlement Area. This decision has been taken after a great deal of consideration and is the result of anticipated increased harvesting by members of the Métis Nation of Ontario pursuant to arrangements made with the government of Ontario that have been challenged in court by the Algonquins of Ontario. In recent years moose populations in certain Wildlife Management Units have declined significantly, coinciding with increased harvesting by self-identified Métis harvesters.
    [Show full text]
  • AOO Settlement Area Harvest
    Wicksteed Lake Lac du Goéland 40 LA SALLE WYSE Lac Smith Marten Lake MCAUSLAN North Spruce Lake Lac du Pin Blanc Poplar LakeHAMMELL GARROWCLARKSON Lac Ramé Lac Bruce Lac Sept Milles Bear Lake OSBORNE POITRAS Lac des Cornes Tilden Lake Map A Lac– Vaucour AOO Settlement Area Harvest Map Lac Saint-Paul Lac des Sables LOCKHART Lac Curières LYMAN NOTMANSTEWART JOCKO EDDY Lac Mosquic Tomiko Lake Lac Nilgaut Lac Barton MERRICK Lac Marin Lac Caugnawana CHARLTONBLYTH Lac Royal Lac des Mocassins MULOCKFRENCHBUTLERANTOINE Lac Maganasipi 41 Lac la Cave Lac Brodtkorb Lac en Croix Lac Gauvin Lac Forbes BEAUCAGE 41 Lac Lamb COMMANDA Lac Resolin Lac Quinn WIDDIFIELD PHELPS Legend OLRIG Lac Murray HWY 17 MATTAWAN Lac à la Tortue Lac McCracken Trout Lake Mattawa Lac Saint-Patrice Lake Talon (lac Talon) Algonquins of Ontario Settlement Area Boundary 42 HWY 17 Lac Dodd Lake Nipissing (lac Nipissing) Rutherglen Lac Duval Lac Wright BONFIELD Lac Schyan FERRIS CALVIN PAPINEAU Deux-Rivières Grand lac des Cèdres Lake Nosbonsing (lac Nosbonsing) Holden Lake Algonquin Park HarvestLac Area Montjoie Stonecliffe Lac Désert Astorville CAMERON CLARA Lac de la Mer Bleue LAUDER Lac Blue Sea Lac Chapleau Wasi Lake (lac Wasi) Rolphton NIPISSING 48 MARIA Harvest Area for Elk BOULTER HEAD CHISHOLM Kiosk BOYD Restoule Lake Lac Galarneau Kioshkokwi Lake ROLPH Deep River Lac Cayamant Lac Marie-Le Franc Commanda Lake PENTLAND FITZGERALD Lac Jim Wildlife Management Unit (WMU) WILKES DEACON Mountain View HIMSWORTH Manitou Lake Carl Wilson Lake Lac McGillivray 47 Cedar Lake BRONSON
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Management Plan (2013)
    A Lake and Watershed Management Plan For Koshlong Lake (Commemorating the KLA 50 th Anniversary) KLA Lake Management Plan (2013) Lake Plan Index Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 7 1.1 The Purpose and Scope of the Koshlong Lake Management Plan (KLMP) .. 8 1.2 Planning Approach ........................................................................................ 9 1.3 Information Sources and Support ................................................................ 11 1.4 Lake Plan Structure ..................................................................................... 12 1.5 Special Thanks ............................................................................................ 12 Chapter 2 Vision, Principles and Targets .............................................................. 13 2.1 Vision and Mandate .................................................................................... 13 2.2 Objectives and Targets ............................................................................... 14 2.3 Observations – Objectives & Targets .......................................................... 16 Chapter 3 Lake Description .................................................................................. 17 3.1 The Name Koshlong Lake ........................................................................... 17 3.2 Native History of Koshlong Lake ................................................................. 17 3.3 The Early Stages of
    [Show full text]
  • Trent Assessment Report
    TRENT CONSERVATION COALITION SOURCE PROTECTION REGION Approved Trent Assessment Report Approved October 1, 2014 Volume 1 of 3 Effective Janurary 1, 2015 Updated February 15, 2018 Trent Source Protection Areas: Crowe Valley Source Protection Area Kawartha-Haliburton Source Protection Area Lower Trent Source Protection Area Otonabee-Peterborough Source Protection Area Made possible through the support of the Government of Ontario www.trentsourceprotection.on.ca This Assessment Report was prepared on behalf of the Trent Conservation Coalition Source Protection Committee under the Clean Water Act, 2006. TRENT CONSERVATION COALITION SOURCE PROTECTION COMMITTEE Jim Hunt (Chair) Municipal The Trent Conservation Coalition Source Dave Burton Protection Committee is a locally based Rob Franklin (Bruce Craig to June 2011) committee, comprised of 28 Dave Golem representatives from municipal Rosemary Kelleher‐MacLennan government, First Nations, the Gerald McGregor commercial/industrial/agriculture sectors, Mary Smith and other interests. The Committee’s Richard Straka ultimate role is to develop a Source Protection Plan that establishes policies for Commercial/Industrial preventing, reducing, or eliminating threats Monica Berdin, Recreation/Tourism to sources of drinking water. In developing Edgar Cornish, Agriculture the plan, the committee members are Kerry Doughty, Aggregate/Mining Robert Lake, Economic Development committed to the following: Glenn Milne, Agriculture . Basing policies on the best available Bev Spencer, Agriculture science, and
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 WHAT IS LAKE PLANNING
    1 ii Preamble People residing along the shorelines of the lakes and rivers in Ontario are drawn by the quality of the water, the exposure to nature, the offer of peace and tranquility, and the attraction of sustainable recreational opportunities. What makes each shoreline unique is the particular blend of natural and human communities that thrive there. A growing number of shoreline groups are conducting studies regarding the character and qualities of their respective communities ranging from the casual to the complex. By following their lead, we can establish what it is about our lakes, shorelines, surrounding environment, and communities that should be retained and sustained for future generations. The study of our lake surroundings and shoreline communities requires “One of your most knowledge, patience, enthusiasm and persistence. We have the early powerful tools is to pioneers in lake planning to thank for paving the way for those who will write a report on follow. However, what has yet to be done is to draw upon that collective your own lake and body of experience in order to lay out the process of lake planning in a area. After all, who knows your lake and simple and easily understood manner. Whether a group is either large or area better then small, of greater or lesser means, or narrow or broadly focused, they all must you?” be able to find, within the pages of this handbook, the information they need to design and support their individual planning and stewardship efforts. …Jerry Strickland FOCA (1990) What does this handbook provide? This handbook is best described as a self-help guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Fish Species at Risk
    Hound Lake McCormick Lake Chip Lake Grace Creek Round Island Ketcheson IslandShiner Lake Dog Lake Hound Creek Dry Narrows Robinson Lake Holland Lake Bowen Corner Little Mayo Lake Weddell Island High Falls Bird Lake South Boundary Lake Farm Chute Edward Lake Fosters Lake Horseshoe Bay Birds Creek MaxwellGrace Lake The Great Bend Aide Creek Egan Chute Lyman Island Jamieson Lake Green Narrows West Bay Effingham Lake Distribution of Fish Madawaska Highlands Bowen Creek Mullet Lake Mayo Lake Sleeper Lake Little Mullet Lake Egan Creek Swordfingal Lake Smith Lake Rockwells IslanLdittle Long Lake Hughes Hay Bay Dog Bay Weslemkoon Lake Species at Risk Clark Lake Clark Creek V Lake Coburn Creek Redmond Bay Brethour Lake Bronson Canoe Lake Mullet Creek Tilney Lake Trip Lake The Eagles Nest Copper Lake L'Amable Creek Buck Lake Weslemkoon Crowe Valley Aide Lake Kerr Lake Baptiste Faraday CreeBk ancroft Airfield Little Bear Pond Baudette Lake Little Sunken Lake Grassy Lake Burtchell Creek York River Little Birch Lake Conservation Authority Waterhouse Lake York River O'Neill Lake Vanluven Lake Bronson Lake Detlor Bancroft Beech Lake (Map 1 of 2) North Vance Lake The Chain Lakes McCrae Bronson Station Pond Lily Lake Beechmount Kelly Creek Venalen Lake Spruce Lake Faraday Lake Fraser Creek DiamondD Liaamkeo Dnadm Lake Marble Lake Bon Echo Creek Whitefoot Lake Nobbs Lake Jordan Lake McGibbon Lake Card Lake Lost Lake Derry Lake Spurr Lake Jimmie Lake East Tommy Lake Hudson Creek Tait Lake Todd Lakes Riddell Lake Egan Lake Currie Lake Highland Grove
    [Show full text]
  • Written Submission from the Algonquins of Ontario Mémoire Des
    CMD 18-M48.12 File/dossier : 6.02.04 Date : 2018-11-27 Edocs pdf : 5721870 Written submission from the Mémoire des Algonquins of Ontario Algonquins de l’Ontario In the Matter of À l’égard de Regulatory Oversight Report for Uranium Rapport de surveillance réglementaire des Mines, Mills, Historic and Decommissioned mines et usines de concentration d’uranium et Sites in Canada: 2017 des sites historiques et déclassés au Canada : 2017 Commission Meeting Réunion de la Commission December 12, 2018 Le 12 décembre 2018 Review of CNSC Regulatory Oversight Report: Uranium Mines, Mills, Historic, and Decommissioned Sites in Canada (2017) Algonquins of Ontario Contents ...........................................................................................................................................................i Contents ..........................................................................................................................................i Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 Core Issues and Accommodations for the AOO .......................................................... 6 Traditional Knowledge and Cultural Heritage Considerations ................................. 13 General Comments & Accommodations ................................................................... 17 Summary ........................................................................................................................... 22 6.0 References
    [Show full text]
  • CARDIFF and BICROFT TOWNSHIP 29 30 31 32 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 18 19 20 21 D R LOT and CONCESSIONS 15 16 17 Loop R Lot 13 14 D E 11 12 K 8 9 10 R 7 A
    MUNICIPALITY OF HIGHLANDS EAST CARDIFF AND BICROFT TOWNSHIP 29 30 31 32 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 18 19 20 21 d R LOT AND CONCESSIONS 15 16 17 Loop R Lot 13 14 d e 11 12 k 8 9 10 r 7 a 6 l 1 2 3 4 5 Cardiff Lake Con. A C d Peel Rd d Buxton Rd R p R oo d Rd Cardiff Creek L or H d C f l XXII um a M o o r c r Loop Rd d Pusey Lake p o a u R e Outram Rd r Ojibway Rd H t e L R k ll Pine Rd a d Ta r XXI e i k Hudson Lake a d l c e u R Dead Horse Lake C LEGEND R Me teorite Lake Rd S d Cope Lake South Baptiste XX Witch Hazel Rd ! Lake Rd W ! Long Lake e Settlements s L t Diamond Lake Jordan Lake a Little Maple Lake D IGHLAND k H d i Little Mud Lake e a R m XIX GROVE R n o Roads L d e o n M g d agnificent Rd o a p H I Dixie Lake R County Road XVII d Rowley Rd Halls Lake Herlihey Rd Deer CARDIFF Lake Rd Coumbs Rd Township Road XVII Huckleberry Lake Deer Lake Private Road Airport Rd XVI Sandy Lake Drurys Pond d R Forest Access Road op Cedar Lake Lo XV Otter Lake ! Water Access Road Lower Cup Lake Cup Lake Monck Lake g in d d R XIV Little Cup Lake r Colbourne Lake a e H k a Centre Lake d Big Hardings Lake L Township Boundary n R Adanac Rd rso Adams Lake Twin Lakes de HWY Centre An XIII 118 Hardings Lake Lake Monck Lakes Lake d BICROFT Bryans R Long Pond d Lot & Concessions XII d d R Cheddar Lake 118 R HWY R s e r e k e e Auger a d L Upper Paudash Lake CARDIFF L n Lake a XI k Dickinson c G In n le Rd o t ! Auger B Hook Lake M ay Lake R X Lake On The Mountain d Monck Rd d 0 1.5 3 4.5 6 km R North Eels Lake Brough Lake Upper o Paudash n Brough y Lake V Lake
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Readings (From 2008, As Part of the MOE Lake Partner Program)
    Calcium Readings (from 2008, as part of the MOE Lake Partner Program) NOTE - The red rows indicate a pending or serious problem. TOWNSHIP LAKE_NAME Site Description Date Ca ANSON BOB LAKE (BIG) Mid Lake, deep spot 04-Apr-10 3.7 ANSON BOB LAKE (BIG) Mid Lake, deep spot 25-Apr-09 3.9 CARDIFF COPE LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 08-Jul-10 3.9 CARDIFF COPE LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 27-Apr-09 3.9 CARDIFF COPE LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 29-Oct-08 3.4 CARDIFF LOWER PAUDASH LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 13-May-08 10.2 CARDIFF MINNICOCK LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 11-Jun-09 8.4 CARDIFF PAUDASH LAKE Joe Bay 13-May-08 8.0 DUDLEY DRAG LAKE Main Basin, deep spot 28-May-10 7.0 DUDLEY LONG LAKE E end, Mid-lake 29-Oct-08 13.3 DUDLEY MISKWABI LAKE E end, bay and shore 16-Jun-10 13.4 DUDLEY MISKWABI LAKE E end, bay and shore 19-May-08 14.6 DUDLEY MISKWABI LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 16-Jun-10 13.6 DUDLEY MISKWABI LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 19-May-08 13.9 DUDLEY WENONA (L. DUDMON) N end, deep spot 02-May-10 14.5 DUDLEY WENONA (L. DUDMON) N end, deep spot 07-Jun-09 12.5 DUDLEY WENONA (L. DUDMON) N end, deep spot 18-Sep-08 14.7 DYSART ET AL BIG BARNUM LAKE S Bay, deep spot 30-May-10 5.8 DYSART ET AL BIG BARNUM LAKE S Bay, deep spot 18-May-09 5.6 DYSART ET AL BIG BARNUM LAKE S Bay, deep spot 19-May-08 6.0 DYSART ET AL EAST LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 13-May-10 2.3 DYSART ET AL EAST LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 08-May-09 10.5 DYSART ET AL EAST LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 14-May-08 10.9 DYSART ET AL LITTLE STRAGGLE LAKE Mid Lake, deep spot 02-May-10 11.3 DYSART ET AL LITTLE STRAGGLE LAKE Mid
    [Show full text]
  • By HFNICHOLSON Great Lakes Biolimnol
    BIBLIOGRAPHY -ON THE LIMNOLOGY AND FISHERIES. OF CANADIAN FRESHWATERS. NO .''5 (REVISED). by H.F.NICHOLSON Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory, Canada Centre for Inland Waters, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario. L7R 4A6 PREFACE This is a revised edition of Bibliography No.5, published in 1978 as Fish. Environm.Can., Fish.Mar.Serv., Techn.Rept., (804). Due to budget restrictions and the high cost of printing, combined with an expanding distribution list, it is no longer possible to publish this series as Technical Reports. Instead, each number will be issued in this present looseleaf form as an unpublished report of the Great Lakes Biolimnology Laboratory. Please note that those from outside Canada requesting copies of this series will be sent the Reference Indexes only. However, the Canadian Freshwater Features Section will be sent if specifically requested. This issue can be referenced as:- Nicholson, H.F. 1982. "Bibliography on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. No.5(revised)". Can.Dept.Fish.Oceans, Pacific & Freshw.Fish., Great Lakes Biolimnol.Lab., Unpubl.Rept. FORMAT The bibliography is divided into two sections:- (1). Reference Index Each of these references contains information on the limnology and fisheries of Canadian freshwaters. They are numbered and appear in numerical order. This enumeration is consecutive and continuous through the bibliography series. (2). Freshwater Feature Index This section is divided into alphabetical order of provinces and within each province the freshwater feature names are in alphabetical order. The coordinates (in minutes and degrees, latitude and longitude) are given for each feature except for British Columbia where, for the most part, the quadrilateral indexing system is used.
    [Show full text]
  • Paudash Lake Belmont Lake-Crowe Lake Marmora Baptiste
    •M EDGEWATER MOTEL Mississagagon and Mazinaw Lakes BAPTISTE - L'AMABLE Highway 28, 10 miles southeast of Bancroft, on the shore of Paudash Lake. Fishing, swimming and boat- Bass - Pickerel - Pike - Trout ing. Modern motel, 3 piece private bathrooms. Res- LIMERICK LAKES - BANCROFT taurants nearby. May 1st to Oct. 15th. D.A.A. Rec- Bass - Pickerel - Pike - Lake and Brook Trout ommended. Address: John G. Rutledge, 46 Sheppard Salmon Ave. W., Willowdale, Ont. Summer: R.R. 3, Bancroft, Ont. Beautiful lakes along the route of No. 62 Highway from Belleville. Exquisitely lovely in their rugged but graceful shorelines. There is good fishing, thrills and excitement await- ing those who visit the fine resorts at these lakes. Each lake is significant with its sand beaches and natural environment. BIRCH CLIFF LODGE Baptiste Lake, 9 miles west from Bancroft, turn left off Highway 62 at Bird's Creek. Excellent loca- tion for family vacation - Accommodation for 75 ARAGAIN LODGE guests • 14 sleeping cottages all with 3 piece bath - Kashwakamak Lake, Harlowe, Ontario. Aragain Lodge Modern dining room and lounge - Large recreation is the most modern resort in the Land-0-Lakes Dis- hall - Dancing and many in and outdoor games - trict and is an ideal place for a restful vacation. Fishing - Water sports and hiking - Golf and riding Noted for excellent food, good fishing, sandy beach, nearby. Folders on request - Phone Bancroft 827 R 13. WHITE PINE LODGE AND MOTEL recreation room, snack bar, Peterborough Boats. Arthur W. Nicoll, Baptiste, Ont. Modern sleeping cabins and motel. Folder and rates In Haliburton's Lake and Woodland Playground.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble and Acknowledgements ........................................preceeding pages Table of Contents......................................................................................................i Summary................................................................................................................... iii 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 What is a Lake Stewardship Plan? ...............................................................................1 Do Bobs and Crow Lakes Need a Lake Stewardship Plan? .....................................1 How was the Plan Developed? ...................................................................................2 Principles Behind the Stewardship Plan.......................................................................3 Developing the Vision ...................................................................................................4 Information Sources and Support ................................................................................4 Seven Objectives ...........................................................................................................6 Initial Considerations for Implementation ...................................................................6 2 Bobs and Crow Lakes – a Perspective...................................................................7 A Brief History of the Bobs and Crow Lakes Area.......................................................7
    [Show full text]