DOCSLIB.ORG

L]Z Lgzwjx]Zi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
L]Z Lgzwjx]Zi The Trebuchet Recent reconstructions and computer simulations reveal the operating principles of the most powerful weapon of its time by Paul E. Chevedden, Les Eigenbrod, Vernard Foley and Werner Soedel enturies before the development of eÝective cannons, huge artillery pieces were demolishing castle walls with projectiles the weight of an Cupright piano. The trebuchet, invented in China between the Þfth and third centuries B.C.E., reached the Mediterranean by the sixth century C.E. It displaced other forms of artillery and held its own until well after the coming of gunpowder. The trebuchet was instrumental in the rapid expansion of both the Islamic and the Mongol empires. It also played a part in the transmis- sion of the Black Death, the epidemic of plague that swept Eurasia and North Africa during the 14th century. Along the way it seems to have inßuenced both the development of clockwork and theoretical analyses of motion. The trebuchet succeeded the catapult, which in turn was a mechanization of the bow [see ÒAncient Catapults,Ó by Werner Soedel and Vernard Foley; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, March 1979]. Catapults drew their energy from the elastic deformation of twisted ropes or sinews, whereas trebuchets relied on gravity or direct human power, which proved vastly more eÝective. The average catapult launched a missile weighing between 13 and 18 kilo- 66 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN July 1995 Copyright 1995 Scientific American, Inc. manajaniq (An Elegant Book on Treb- uchets), written in 1462 C.E. by Yusuf ibn Urunbugha al-Zaradkash. One of the most profusely illustrated Arabic manuscripts ever produced, it provides detailed construction and operating in- formation. These writings are particu- larly signiÞcant because they oÝer a unique insight into the applied mechan- ics of premodern societies. We have made scale models and com- puter simulations that have taught us a great deal about the trebuchetÕs opera- tion. As a result, we believe we have un- powerful trebuchets, in contrast, could covered design principles essentially launch missiles weighing a ton or more. lost since the Middle Ages. In addition, Furthermore, their maximum range we have found historical materials that could exceed that of ancient artillery. push back the date of the trebuchetÕs spread and reveal its crucial role in me- grams, and the most commonly used Recovering Lost Knowledge dieval warfare. heavy catapults had a capacity of 27 Historians had previously assumed kilograms. According to Philo of Byzan- e have only recently begun to re- that the diÝusion of trebuchets west- tium, however, even these machines Wconstruct the history and operat- ward from China occurred too late to could not inßict much damage on walls ing principles of the trebuchet. Schol- aÝect the initial phase of the Islamic at a distance of 160 meters. The most ars as yet have made no comprehen- conquests, from 624 to 656. Recent sive eÝort to examine all the available work by one of us (Chevedden), howev- evidence. In particular, Islamic technical er, shows that trebuchets reached the literature has been neglected. The most eastern Mediterranean by the late 500s, 1 important surviving technical treatise were known in Arabia and were used on these machines is Kitab aniq Þ al- with great eÝect by Islamic armies. The MODERN RECONSTRUCTION of a medieval siege engine hurls a piano across the English countryside. This trebuchet, patterned after ones used in Europe and the Middle East, has lofted objects weighing as much as 500 kilograms. Its largest fore- bears could toss more than a ton. (The 60-foot-high reconstruction was built in Shropshire by Hew Kennedy and Richard Barr.) 2 7 3 4 6 VIN GUGLIELMO GAL Copyright 1995 Scientific American, Inc. technological sophistication for which logical warfare had perhaps its most neers thickened walls to withstand the Islam later became known was already devastating impact. As Mongol forces new artillery and redesigned fortiÞca- manifest. besieged this Genoese outpost on the tions to employ trebuchets against at- The Mongol conquests, the largest in Crimean peninsula, the Black Death tackers. Architects working under al- human history, also owed something swept through their ranks. Diseased Adil (1196Ð1218), SaladinÕs brother and to this weapon. As a cavalry nation, the corpses were then hurled into the city, successor, introduced a defensive sys- Mongols employed Chinese and Mus- and from KaÝa the Black Death spread tem that used gravity-powered trebu- lim engineers to build and operate treb- to the Mediterranean ports of Europe chets mounted on the platforms of tow- uchets for their sieges. At the invest- via Genoese merchants. ers to prevent enemy artillery from com- ment of KaÝa in the Crimea in 1345Ð The trebuchet came to shape defen- ing within eÝective range. These towers, 46, the trebuchetÕs contribution to bio- sive as well as oÝensive tactics. Engi- designed primarily as artillery emplace- Sling was attached firmly to the beam at one end The Physics and looped over a metal prong at the other. When it of the Trebuchet reached the proper angle in its arc, the loop would fly free, releasing the projectile. Proper adjustment of the prong and the overall length of the sling were he motion of the trebuchet is crucial to achieving maximum range. T simple enough in its essentials to have inspired medieval studies of motion, but its details are subtle and require computer simulations to interpret accurately. Only recently have we come to understand how the rotation of the counterweight plays a crucial role in transferring energy to the beam and thence to the sling and projectile. FIXED COUNTERWEIGHT TRACTION Earliest trebuchets were powered by crews Addition of counterweights increased the power of the treb- pulling on ropes rather than by counterweights. uchet. The elimination of the pulling ropes made possible anoth- Crews of as many as 250 men pulled to send er innovation: by placing a trough under the trebuchet beam to projectiles 100 meters or more. In this example of hold the projectile, engineers could lengthen the sling and in- a small traction machine, the sling-holder’s weight crease the range even further. The sling rotates faster after the flexed the beam and increased the range. shot is airborne, so its length controls the launch angle. 68 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN July 1995 Copyright 1995 Scientific American, Inc. ments, took on enormous proportions long end swung upward, hurling the projectile on the other end of the arm to accommodate the larger trebuchets, missile from the sling. might weigh between 200 and 300 kilo- and castles were transformed from Three major forms developed: trac- grams, and a few trebuchets reportedly walled enclosures with a few small tow- tion machines, powered by crews pull- threw stones weighing between 900 and ers into clusters of large towers joined ing on ropes; counterweight machines, 1,360 kilograms. With such increased by short stretches of curtain walls. The activated by the fall of large masses; capability, even dead horses or bundled towers on the citadels of Damascus, and hybrid forms that employed both humans could be ßung. A modern re- Cairo and Bosra are massive structures, gravity and human power. When trac- construction made in England has as large as 30 meters square. tion machines Þrst appeared in the tossed a compact car (476 kilograms Mediterranean world at the end of the without its engine) 80 meters using a Simple but Devastating sixth century, their capabilities were so 30-ton counterweight. far superior to those of earlier artillery During their heyday, trebuchets re- he principle of the trebuchet was that they were said to hurl Òmountains ceived much attention from engineersÑ T straightforward. The weapon con- and hills.Ó The most powerful hybrid indeed, the very word ÒengineeringÓ is sisted of a beam that pivoted around machines could launch shot about three intimately related to them. In Latin and an axle that divided the beam into a to six times as heavy as that of the most the European vernaculars, a common long and short arm. The longer arm ter- commonly used large catapults. In ad- term for trebuchet was ÒengineÓ (from minated in a cup or sling for hurling the dition, they could discharge signiÞcant- ingenium, Òan ingenious contrivanceÓ), missile, and the shorter one in an at- ly more missiles in a given time. and those who designed, made and tachment for pulling ropes or a coun- Counterweight machines went much used them were called ingeniators. terweight. When the device was posi- further. The box for the weight might Engineers modiÞed the early designs tioned for launch, the short arm was be the size of a peasantÕs hut and con- to increase range by extracting the most aloft; when the beam was released, the tain tens of thousands of kilograms. The possible energy from the falling coun- terweight and to increase accuracy by minimizing recoil. The Þrst diÝerence between counterweight machines and their traction forebears is that the sling Hinged counterweight HINGED on the end of the arm is much longer. COUNTERWEIGHT machines added yet another This change aÝects performance dra- increment to the range by im- matically by increasing the eÝective proving the efficiency with length of the throwing arm. It also which the trebuchet converted opens the way for a series of additional gravitational energy to projec- improvements by making the angle at tile motion. The center of grav- which the missile is released largely in- ity of the weight fell straight dependent of the angle of the arm. By down during the first phase of varying the length of the sling ropes, acceleration; as the hinge engineers could ensure that shot left straightened, the rotation of the machine at an angle of about 45 the weight around its center of degrees to the vertical, which produces gravity added to the energy the longest trajectory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DIY Science Catapult
    DIY Science Catapult How can making a catapult help you prove something that it took mankind millennia to work out? Look at the science behind siege engines in the DIY Catapult! Historical Overview On War Machines and Mangonels One of the problems with warfare throughout history was that enemies had the annoying habit of hiding behind fortifications. The solution: to find a way of beating down, piercing or otherwise destroying part of the wall so as to gain entry. Alternatively, it was equally important to be able to keep others intent on destroying your walls at bay. Enter the one- armed throwing engine. What’s a Mangonel? The Greeks c200 BC referred to these one-armed machines as among numerous devices that could be used by the defence against a besieger’s machinery. People from the Mediterranean to the China Sea developed war machines that operated using the elasticity of various materials. The term catapult is used to describe all of the different types of throwing machines. What you and I know as a catapult is actually a mangonel, otherwise known as an onager. Onager was the slang term derived from the Greek name for ‘wild donkey’. This referred to the way the machine ‘kicks’ when it’s fired. The correct term for the machine is mangonel - derived from the ancient Greek term “manganon” meaning “engine of war”. Historical Evidence There is very little archaeological or historical evidence on the mangonel. However, the Roman, Ammianus, does describe one in his writings, but the proportions of the machine are unknown. There remain some medieval illustrations of the machines and some speculative drawings from the 18th and 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476)
    Impact of Empire 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd i 5-4-2007 8:35:52 Impact of Empire Editorial Board of the series Impact of Empire (= Management Team of the Network Impact of Empire) Lukas de Blois, Angelos Chaniotis Ségolène Demougin, Olivier Hekster, Gerda de Kleijn Luuk de Ligt, Elio Lo Cascio, Michael Peachin John Rich, and Christian Witschel Executive Secretariat of the Series and the Network Lukas de Blois, Olivier Hekster Gerda de Kleijn and John Rich Radboud University of Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, P.O. Box 9103, 6500 HD Nijmegen, The Netherlands E-mail addresses: [email protected] and [email protected] Academic Board of the International Network Impact of Empire geza alföldy – stéphane benoist – anthony birley christer bruun – john drinkwater – werner eck – peter funke andrea giardina – johannes hahn – fik meijer – onno van nijf marie-thérèse raepsaet-charlier – john richardson bert van der spek – richard talbert – willem zwalve VOLUME 6 IMEM-6-deBlois_CS2.indd ii 5-4-2007 8:35:52 The Impact of the Roman Army (200 BC – AD 476) Economic, Social, Political, Religious and Cultural Aspects Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C. – A.D. 476) Capri, March 29 – April 2, 2005 Edited by Lukas de Blois & Elio Lo Cascio With the Aid of Olivier Hekster & Gerda de Kleijn LEIDEN • BOSTON 2007 This is an open access title distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonine Plague 7, 195, 197, 201–217 Demographic Effect 195
    INDEX Abolition of memory 85 n. 27, 268, Antonine Plague 7, 195, 197, 201–217 267 demographic effect 195 Abrittus 106 in Egypt 204–206 Abrochia 205–206 Antoniniani 247, 251, 252, 256, Accessibility 271 286–288, 300, 303–306 Acclamation 323 n. 29, 328 Antoninus Pius 26, 199, 298, 369 as Imperator 64, 329 Apamea (Syria) 99, 100, 101, 102, formulas 332 103, 106 Account money 250 Aphrodisias 35 Achaia 27, 113, 124 Appianus 157 Ad edictum praetoris 265 Apollodorus of Damascus 146 Adaeratio 227, 228 Apollonius of Tyana 397, 399 Adulis 242 Appointment policy 112 Aemilius Aemilianus 116 Aqueducts 186 Aemulatio, aristocratic 69, 70, 72 Arabia 264, 269 Aerarium 224 Area Palatina 329 Africa 5, 26–27, 48–49, 57–60, 106, Arenas 186 108, 114–116, 118, 120, 122–124, Argenteus 257 222–225, 231, 272 Arius 417 Ager Gallicus 166 Army pay 250 Ager per mensura extremitatem Arrien de Nicomédie 102, 103 comprehensus 230 Ascension to the throne 327–336 Ager publicus 157 Asia Minor 27, 113, 122–123, 133, Aggregate income 185 137, 148 n. 42, 203, 220–224, 227, Aggregate production 197 253 Agricola, life of 106 Assaria 253 Agricultural change 197 Assayers 246–247 Agricultural decline 197 Asses 253 Agrippina 89 n. 35 Assidui 158, 161, 162 Aila 235 Athens 371, 399, 402, 406 Ala Contariorum 101 inhabitants of 406, 408 Alamans 104 Atmospheric metal pollution 189 Alani 102 Attalus 156 Albano 103 Atticus, A. 106 Alexander of Aphrodisias 408, 409 Attius Suburanus, Sex. 68 Alexandria 236, 371, 408 Augustae 267, 302 Allectus 53, 54, 55 Augustus 23, 67, 70, 71, 162, 164, Ammianus Marcellinus 145–147, 149 262, 263, 298 Ampli cator 272 Res Gestae 78–80 Anatolia, inhabitants of 107 Aula 331 Animal bones assemblages 191 Aurei 248, 249, 250, 254 in Roman Italy 192 Aurelianianus 256 in the provinces 191 Aurelianus 17, 51, 73, 107, 108, Annales 184 118–119, 122, 295 n.
    [Show full text]
  • Catapult Challenge Home Learners Pack
    Suitable for ages 8-12 KS2 & KS3 Science, Technology, Engineering, Maths Engines of War How far can you throw a stone? Pretty far if you practice, I bet! How about a rock? Not so far? What about something bigger than you? It was a challenge to throw heavy objects long distances until the clever Ancient Greeks invented the siege engine. A siege engine is a mechanical machine that can launch projectiles over a long distance. They are what armies used before gunpowder and cannon were invented. You would not always face your enemy on the battlefield, sometimes they would barricade themselves within their fort, stronghold or town and hope you would go away. Before the invention of siege engines you would have to wait to starve them out but thanks to the Greeks, some impressive technology was invented that revolutionised siege warfare. Battering rams, mechanical crossbows and siege towers were all ingenious designs that helped you get inside the walls of wherever your enemy was hiding. Keep on reading to find out about three of the most deadly siege engines and how they worked. Did you know... You can shoot a catapult but you cannot fire it! That is because a catapult does not use an explosive creating fire. Additional resources You can watch our Home Learning Hub Catapult Challenge video on our YouTube channel. Catapult Challenge / © Royal Armouries / June 2020 / 1/8 History of the catapult The first catapults We do not exactly know when the first catapult was made but we do know that the Ancient Greeks used them.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Information Pack
    THE ERMINE STREET GUARD INFORMATION PACK CONTACT DETAILS E-Mail - [email protected] Website - www.erminestreetguard.co.uk Telephone - 01452 862235 About The Ermine Street Guard Since its formation in 1972, the Guard has become the leading society studying the Roman Army and its equipment. Authenticity and Research Each piece of kit is made as authentically as is practicable based on recent research. The majority of the equipment is made by Guard Education members to high standards of workmanship Public displays are given at major Roman sites throughout Great Britain and Eu- and accuracy and is continually being added rope. The displays include aspects of the Roman soldier’s training, the shooting to and improved as new information and finds of artillery pieces and a static army camp display. At selected venues the Guard become available. The Guard works closely is also joined by fully equipped Roman cavalrymen. with leading academics in the field to ensure the kit is correct based on current research. Please contact the Guard for further details of venues or visit the website. Roman Officers Centurio The Centurio was the Officer in charge of a Century of 80 men. A Century never consisted of 100 men, and in Republican times only consisted of 60 men. The Centurio was normally a career soldier who had worked his way up through the ranks and was tough and experienced. In battle he would lead from the front, which meant they had a high mortality rate. The equipment reflected his high status and was designed to make him easy to pick out in battle.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Role of the Roman Army in the Province of Lower Moesia (Moesia Inferior) INSTITUTE of EUROPEAN CULTURE ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY in POZNAŃ
    Economic role of the Roman army in the province of Lower Moesia (Moesia Inferior) INSTITUTE OF EUROPEAN CULTURE ADAM MICKIEWICZ UNIVERSITY IN POZNAŃ ACTA HUMANISTICA GNESNENSIA VOL. XVI ECONOMIC ROLE OF THE ROMAN ARMY IN THE PROVINCE OF LOWER MOESIA (MOESIA INFERIOR) Michał Duch This books takes a comprehensive look at the Roman army as a factor which prompted substantial changes and economic transformations in the province of Lower Moesia, discussing its impact on the development of particular branches of the economy. The volume comprises five chapters. Chapter One, entitled “Before Lower Moesia: A Political and Economic Outline” consti- tutes an introduction which presents the economic circumstances in the region prior to Roman conquest. In Chapter Two, entitled “Garrison of the Lower Moesia and the Scale of Militarization”, the author estimates the size of the garrison in the province and analyzes the influence that the military presence had on the demography of Lower Moesia. The following chapter – “Monetization” – is concerned with the financial standing of the Roman soldiery and their contri- bution to the monetization of the province. Chapter Four, “Construction”, addresses construction undertakings on which the army embarked and the outcomes it produced, such as urbanization of the province, sustained security and order (as envisaged by the Romans), expansion of the economic market and exploitation of the province’s natural resources. In the final chapter, entitled “Military Logistics and the Local Market”, the narrative focuses on selected aspects of agriculture, crafts and, to a slightly lesser extent, on trade and services. The book demonstrates how the Roman army, seeking to meet its provisioning needs, participated in and contributed to the functioning of these industries.
    [Show full text]
  • So You Want to Build an Onager Brian Lapham Lord Doughal Stewart
    Catapulta So you want to Build an Onager By Brian Lapham Also known as: Lord Doughal Stewart Copyright ©2003 Fowl Farms Publishing A division of Fowl Farms Inc. 1 Contents Getting Started 1 Firing 23 Background 1 Preparing for a live shoot 23 What do you want your catapult to do? 2 Tensioning the skein 23 How will you transport it? 2 Aiming and firing 23 Where will you store it? 2 Tweaking 24 What are those parts called, anyway? 3 What will it look like? 4 Calculating the dimensions 4 Making plans 6 Conclusion 25 Choosing materials 7 Tools 8 Book sources A Construction 9 Internet sources A Main frame 9 Subsidiary structure and buffer 11 Parts list B Throwing arm 12 Torsion hardware 14 Additional schematics C Attaching the skein and arm 15 The winch 16 Sling 18 Pouch shape 18 Sling length 19 Sling stability 19 How to build a sling 19 Projectile ramp 20 Wheels 21 Projectiles 21 Finishing work 22 Getting Started So how long have you wanted to fling things? I’ve had the urge for this since I was in elementary school. My interest was re-peaked when I saw a Saturday Night Live sketch which was a commercial spoof for a backyard catapult to launch your trash into your neighbor’s yard. But it wasn’t until 1994, after I’d been in the Society for Creative Anachronism for a couple of years, when I went to my first Estrella war and saw a catapult powered by garage door springs. That was when I decided to make catapults the focus of my SCA hobby.
    [Show full text]
  • A Multidisciplinary Re-Evaluation of the Fabrication and Operation of the 4Th Century CE Roman Artillery Engine Known As the Onager
    Paper ID #13049 A Multidisciplinary Re-evaluation of the Fabrication and Operation of the 4th Century CE Roman Artillery Engine known as the Onager Dr. Willard W. Neel, Virginia Military Institute Willard Wayne Neel, Ph.D., PE, Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the Virginia Military Institute. He has degrees in physics and mechanical engineering from the University of South Florida and N.C. State University, respectively. Besides teaching for the past forty six years he is interested in ancient and medieval technology. Col. Jon-Michael Hardin P.E., Virginia Military Institute Page 26.70.1 Page c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Multidisciplinary Re-evaluation of the Fabrication and Operation of the 4th Century CE Roman Artillery Engine known as the Onager. Introduction Multidisciplinary projects provide unique opportunities to foster critical thinking in undergraduate engineering students and to allow them the opportunity to determine and use applicable engineering analysis methods. In addition, multidisciplinary projects which combine engineering analysis and a study of technological history are an interesting way to increase student interest in the engineering design process. To motivate and reinforce the targeted engineering skill sets/learning outcomes of critical thinking and the ability to determine and apply applicable engineering analysis techniques at the University of X, a small engineering school in the south, a multi-disciplinary student project, called the “Onager Project”, was developed. For this interdisciplinary project a team of three undergraduate mechanical engineering seniors investigated the extant historical technical information concerning the 4th Century CE Roman siege weapon known as the Onager and then determined and applied appropriate modern engineering analysis, design, and testing methods to recreate an Onager design that satisfied the constraints documented or implied by the historical documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Throwing Engines Versus Gunpowder Artillery in Siege Activities in the Middle Ages – an Example of the Kingdoms of Poland and Bohemia
    FASCICULI ARCHAEOLOGIAE HISTORICAE FASC. XXXIII, PL ISSN 0860-0007 DOI 10.23858/FAH33.2020.007 PIOTR STRZYŻ* THROWING ENGINES VERSUS GUNPOWDER ARTILLERY IN SIEGE ACTIVITIES IN THE MIDDLE AGES – AN EXAMPLE OF THE KINGDOMS OF POLAND AND BOHEMIA Abstract: The invention of gunpowder and its use in projectile throwing is rightly regarded as one of the greatest, if not the greatest, inno- vations in the history of war technology. However, the first artillery, which we have some mention of in Europe in 1326, had to compete for a long time with various types of throwing engines used in military operations, especially sieges, successfully since ancient times. It was no different in Central Europe, where throwing engines were still used in siege in the 4th quarter of the 15th century. The article analyses written and archaeological sources confirming the simultaneous use of throwing engines and gunpowder artillery in the Kingdom of Poland and the Kingdom of Bohemia until the end of the 15th century. Keywords: Central Europe, Kingdom of Poland, Kingdom of Bohemia, Middle Ages, artillery, throwing engines Received: 01.06.2020 Revised: 02.07.2020 Accepted: 05.07.2020 Citation: Strzyż P. 2020. Throwing Engines versus Gunpowder Artillery in Siege Activities in the Middle Ages – An Example of the King- doms of Poland and Bohemia. “Fasciculi Archaeologiae Historicae” 33, 103-123, DOI 10.23858/FAH33.2020.007 Introduction development in Central European countries. The King- In 1505 an atypical event in Prague was recorded dom of Poland under the rule of Casimir III and the in Staré letopisy české: “In this year, on Monday after Kingdom of Bohemia under the Luxemburg dynasty, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Reliable Romans: Make a Roman-Inspired Catapult Drawing Below: Public Domain
    Reliable Romans: make a Roman-inspired catapult Drawing below: Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=372928 A catapult is a ballistic device used to launch a projectile a great distance without the aid of explosive devices. The Greek Dionysius the Elder of Syracuse, who was looking to develop a new type of weapon, invented the catapult about 400 BCE. It became a key weapon in warfare and remained so until the end of medieval times. The Roman Army often used catapults in sieges – a siege is a military blockade of a settlement, city or fortress with the intent of conquering. The term comes from the word sedere, Latin for ‘to sit’ – a siege often involved lots of sitting and waiting for the settlement, city or fortress to surrender. A small catapult often used by the Romans was the onager, which derived its name from the kicking action of the machine as it threw stones in the air, similar to the hooves of the wild ass, the onager, a native of the eastern part of the Empire. The onager consisted of a large frame placed on the ground to whose front end a vertical frame of solid timber was rigidly fixed. The projectile (large stone) was attached to a sling or put in the cup shaped tip of the arm. To fire it, the arm was forced (winched) down and then suddenly released, and the projectile would be hurled forward. The arm would then be caught by a padded beam or bed, when it could be winched back again to be reloaded.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Heavy Artillery: the Helepolis George T
    Byzantine Heavy Artillery: The Helepolis George T. Dennis HE MILITARY MANUAL (Strategikon) attributed to the emperor Maurice stipulated that the infantry contingents Tshould be followed by a train of wagons, some of which were to transport artillery crews, carpenters, and metal workers, as well as ball¤straw •kat°rvyen strefÒmenaw.1 In his translation accompanying the Greek text E. Gamilscheg rendered this as “Katapulten nach beiden Seiten zu drehen.” I put it into English as “revolving ballistae at both ends.”2 I visualized the wagons as mobile fighting platforms with two medium-sized torsion or tension weapons, ballistae, which re- volved in a horizontal arc, somewhat like pivoting machine guns. “Both ends,” though, I am now convinced, refers to the weapon, not the wagon, and the revolving motion must have been vertical, up and down (like a child’s seesaw), not hori- zontal.3 Torsion weapons, such as the ballista, do not revolve; 1 Das Strategikon des Maurikios, ed. G. T. Dennis, transl. E. Gamilscheg (CFHB 17: Vienna 1981) 12.B.6.9. 2 Maurice’s Strategikon. Handbook of Byzantine Military Strategy, transl. G. T. Dennis (Philadelphia 1984) 139. 3 It is possible, but unlikely, that the author is referring to the carroballista of Vegetius which was mounted on a small horse-drawn cart (Epitoma rei militaris, ed. and transl. L. Stelten [New York 1990] 2.25, 3.24), or to the swivelling bolt-projecting catapult, also mounted on a cart, described by the Anonymus, De rebus bellicis, ed. R. Ireland (Oxford 1979) 18. But there is no evidence that field artillery of this sort lasted into the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Catapults
    Hvad er matematik? 1 ISBN 978 87 7066 827 9 Ancient Catapults Surviving Greek and Roman texts reveal the remarkable level of mathematical and engineering skill that went into the development of these early ballistic-missile launchers by Werner Soedel and Vernard Foley Scientific American, March 1979, pp. 150 - 160 Web version made available with additional diagrams by: Darius Architectus (Kurt Suleski) In 399 B.C. Dionysius the Elder, ruler of the Greek colony of Syracuse in Sicily, prepared his city for a long war with Carthage by undertaking search and development program. Utilizing such now familiar techniques as the assembly of large teams of specialists, the division of labor to break down the tasks into manageable units, and the provision of financial and psychological incentives. Dionysius clearly aimed from the outset at the production of novel weapons. Out of the program came quadriremes and possibly quinqueremes, ships with the equivalent of four or five banks of oars and so with more potential power behind their rams than the standard three bank triremes. Dionysius’ engineers also devised the first catapults. These early machines probably fired arrows from a bow not much stronger than one a man could draw. By mechanizing the drawing and releasing of the arrow, however, the catapult inventors made possible the construction of much more powerful bows. These devices appear to have been built of composite materials, with a wood core surmounted by a tension layer of animal sinew in the front and a compression layer of horn in the back. Eventually the flexible bow reached the limits of its design, and it was superceded by catapults based on the torsion principle.
    [Show full text]