DOCSLIB.ORG

Charles Darwin's Beagle Voyage, Fossil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charles Darwin's Beagle Voyage, Fossil Journal of the History of Biology (2010) 43:363–399 Ó Springer 2009 DOI 10.1007/s10739-009-9189-9 Charles Darwin’s Beagle Voyage, Fossil Vertebrate Succession, and ‘‘The Gradual Birth & Death of Species’’ PAUL D. BRINKMAN North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences 11 W. Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27601-1029 USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The prevailing view among historians of science holds that Charles Darwin became a convinced transmutationist only in the early spring of 1837, after his Beagle collections had been examined by expert British naturalists. With respect to the fossil vertebrate evidence, some historians believe that Darwin was incapable of seeing or understanding the transmutationist implications of his specimens without the help of Richard Owen. There is ample evidence, however, that he clearly recognized the similarities between several of the fossil vertebrates he collected and some of the extant fauna of South America before he returned to Britain. These comparisons, recorded in his correspondence, his diary and his notebooks during the voyage, were instances of a phenomenon that he later called the ‘‘law of the succession of types.’’ Moreover, on the Beagle, he was following a geological research agenda outlined in the second volume of Charles Lyell’s Principles of Geology, which implies that paleontological data alone could provide an insight into the laws which govern the appearance of new species. Since Darwin claims in On the Origin of Species that fossil vertebrate succession was one of the key lines of evidence that led him to question the fixity of species, it seems certain that he was seriously contemplating transmutation during the Beagle voyage. If so, historians of science need to reconsider both the role of Britain’s expert naturalists and the importance of the fossil vertebrate evidence in the development of Darwin’s ideas on transmutation. Keywords: Darwin, transmutation, fossil vertebrate succession, Beagle, agouti, Megatherium, armadillo, nineteenth century What an immense field for reflection is opened to the mind of the philosopher, by the survey of the discoveries to which fossil oste- ology has conducted us! Edward Pidgeon, 18301 1 Pidgeon, 1830, p. 39. 364 PAUL D. BRINKMAN Introduction Though it is well known that Charles Darwin made an important col- lection of vertebrate fossils in South America while serving on HMS Beagle,2 relatively little serious attention has been given to the meaning and significance that these specimens held for him during the course of the voyage. Among scholars who have written about the role of the fossil vertebrate evidence in the development of Darwin’s thinking about the mutability of species there are two competing hypotheses. One early conversion hypothesis holds that he was immediately and profoundly impressed by the discovery of fossils in South America, which closely resembled the local, extant fauna, and that this – together with other evidence accumulated during the voyage – led him to ques- tion the fixity of species while still on the Beagle. Darwin himself first advanced this idea. In at least two publications, he claimed that he first recognized the phenomenon of fossil vertebrate succession during the voyage. The first sentence of On the Origin of Species, for example, reads: When on board HMS Beagle, as naturalist, I was much struck with certain facts in the distribution of the inhabitants of South America, and in the geological relations of the present to the past inhabitants of that continent. These facts seemed to throw some light on the origin of species.3 In an autobiographical sketch written for his family and published by his son in 1887, Darwin wrote: During the voyage of the Beagle I had been deeply impressed by discovering in the Pampean formation great fossil animals covered with armour like that on the existing armadillos; secondly, by the manner in which closely allied animals replace one another in proceeding southwards over the Continent; and thirdly, by the South American character of most of the productions of the Galapagos archipelago, and more especially by the manner in which they differ slightly on each island of the group; none of the islands appearing to be very ancient in a geological sense. It was evident that such facts as these, as well as many others, could only 2 See Darwin 1839; Moorehead, 1969; Keynes, 2003; Simpson, 1984, pp. 23–39. 3 Darwin, 1859,p.1. CHARLES DARWIN’S BEAGLE VOYAGE 365 be explained on the supposition that species gradually become modified; and the subject haunted me.4 This hypothesis was later promoted by his son, Francis Darwin, his granddaughter, Nora Barlow, the biologist Cyril D. Darlington, and others. British Geologist John W. Judd made the strongest case for the importance of the role of the fossil vertebrate evidence in the early development of Darwin’s evolutionary views.5 This view has since fallen into disfavor, however, and a late con- version hypothesis has emerged as the new consensus view among his- torians of science. Some of Darwin’s own remarks would seem to support a late conversion. In an 1877 letter to German naturalist Otto Zacharias, for example, he wrote: When I was on board the Beagle, I believed in the permanence of species but, as far as I can remember, vague doubts occasionally flitted across my mind. On my return home in the autumn of 1836, I immediately began to prepare my journal for publication, and then saw how many facts indicated the common descent of species so that in July 1837, I opened a note-book to record any facts which might bear on the question. But I did not become convinced that species were mutable until, I think, two or three years had elapsed.6 An oft-quoted journal entry from 1837 seems to pin down the very month of Darwin’s conversion: In July opened first note-book on Transmutation of Species. Had been greatly struck from about the month of previous March on character of South American fossils and species on Galapagos Archipelago. These facts origin (especially latter) of all my views.7 4 Darwin, 1959[1887], Vol. I, p. 67. Darwin made a similar claim in a number of letters, also, including C. Darwin to L. Jenyns, 25 (Nov. 1844), in: Burkhardt and Smith, 1987, p. 84; and, C. Darwin to C. Lyell, (Dec.) 27 (1859), in Burkhardt and Smith, 1991, p. 455. 5 See Darwin, 1909, p. xiii; Barlow, 1946, pp. 166–167; Darlington, 1959, p. 316; Judd, 1909, pp. 351–353; Judd, 1911. Obviously, early twentieth century scholars did not enjoy the easy access to Darwin’s manuscript materials that we have today. Con- sequently, their claims about Darwin’s conversion must be taken with a grain of salt. Francis Darwin and John Judd, on the other hand, had access to Darwin himself. Judd (1909, p. 337, footnote 1) noted that he and Darwin, late in the latter’s life, met peri- odically for ‘‘geology talks.’’ 6 Letter, C. Darwin to O. Zacharias, 1877. This quotation appears in numerous places, including Darwin, 1893, p. 175. 7 Quoted in de Beer, 1959,p.1. 366 PAUL D. BRINKMAN The late conversion hypothesis draws considerable support from these remarks – especially the latter – which suggest that Darwin did not question the fixity of species until after the voyage. But because he contradicted himself in several places on this question, advocates of a late conversion cannot depend solely on Darwin’s own words. Instead, a number of scholars have argued that Darwin could not have become a convinced transmutationist without the aid of London’s expert nat- uralists. With respect to the fossil vertebrate evidence, two principal reasons are most commonly given to show why Darwin could not have appreciated the evolutionary implications of his fossils during the voyage. First, Darwin collected fossils for geological rather than zoo- logical purposes, and he made little or no attempt to compare his fossil vertebrate discoveries to the living fauna of South America.8 Second, Darwin was not a competent enough comparative anatomist to notice or understand the anatomical similarities between the fossil and extant faunas of South America. This tradition emphasizes Darwin’s insuffi- cient experience as a naturalist, his lack of formal anatomical training, and his dependence on the expertise of the British scientific community. As early as 1888, Thomas Henry Huxley argued that Darwin’s ideas about evolution took shape after his return from the voyage: While at sea, [Darwin] diligently collected, studied, and made copious notes…. But with no previous training in dissection, hardly any power of drawing, and next to no knowledge of comparative anatomy, his occupation with work of this kind – notwithstanding all his zeal and industry – resulted, for the most part, in a vast accumulation of useless manuscript. …[U]ntil the relations of the existing with the extinct species … were determined with some exactness, they afforded but an unsafe foundation for speculation. It was not possible that this determination should have been effected before the return of the ‘‘Beagle’’ to England.9 Likewise, historian Sandra Herbert singled out the phrase ‘‘if one spe- cies altered’’ in the ‘‘Red Notebook’’ as Darwin’s first substantive speculation on transmutation to which she assigned a date no earlier than the end of January, 1837, after the voyage. ‘‘The factual basis for a 8 Gertrude Himmelfarb, who took an extremely dim view of Darwin’s work as a naturalist, argued that his ‘‘geological enterprise was kept quite distinct from the zoo- logical.’’ See Himmelfarb, 1959, pp. 109–110. The quotation appears on p. 109. 9 Huxley, 1896[1888], pp. 271–275. Huxley, who was a champion of the profes- sionalization of British science, was careful not to give too much credit to Darwin, a gentleman-naturalist trained for the clergy (although see Desmond, 1997, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pleistocene Mammals and Paleoecology of the Western Amazon
    PLEISTOCENE MAMMALS AND PALEOECOLOGY OF THE WESTERN AMAZON By ALCEU RANCY A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1991 . To Cleusa, Bianca, Tiago, Thomas, and Nono Saul (Pistolin de Oro) . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work received strong support from John Eisenberg (chairman) and David Webb, both naturalists, humanists, and educators. Both were of special value, contributing more than the normal duties as members of my committee. Bruce MacFadden provided valuable insights at several periods of uncertainty. Ronald Labisky and Kent Redford also provided support and encouragement. My field work in the western Amazon was supported by several grants from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) , and the Universidade Federal do Acre (UFAC) , Brazil. I also benefitted from grants awarded to Ken Campbell and Carl Frailey from the National Science Foundation (NSF) I thank Daryl Paul Domning, Jean Bocquentin Villanueva, Jonas Pereira de Souza Filho, Ken Campbell, Jose Carlos Rodrigues dos Santos, David Webb, Jorge Ferigolo, Carl Frailey, Ernesto Lavina, Michael Stokes, Marcondes Costa, and Ricardo Negri for sharing with me fruitful and adventurous field trips along the Amazonian rivers. The CNPq and the Universidade Federal do Acre, supported my visit to the. following institutions (and colleagues) to examine their vertebrate collections: iii . ; ; Universidade do Amazonas, Manaus
    [Show full text]
  • Reveals That Glyptodonts Evolved from Eocene Armadillos
    Molecular Ecology (2016) 25, 3499–3508 doi: 10.1111/mec.13695 Ancient DNA from the extinct South American giant glyptodont Doedicurus sp. (Xenarthra: Glyptodontidae) reveals that glyptodonts evolved from Eocene armadillos KIEREN J. MITCHELL,* AGUSTIN SCANFERLA,† ESTEBAN SOIBELZON,‡ RICARDO BONINI,‡ JAVIER OCHOA§ and ALAN COOPER* *Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia, †CONICET-Instituto de Bio y Geociencias del NOA (IBIGEO), 9 de Julio No 14 (A4405BBB), Rosario de Lerma, Salta, Argentina, ‡Division Paleontologıa de Vertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo (UNLP), CONICET, Museo de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque, La Plata, Buenos Aires 1900, Argentina, §Museo Arqueologico e Historico Regional ‘Florentino Ameghino’, Int De Buono y San Pedro, Rıo Tercero, Cordoba X5850, Argentina Abstract Glyptodonts were giant (some of them up to ~2400 kg), heavily armoured relatives of living armadillos, which became extinct during the Late Pleistocene/early Holocene alongside much of the South American megafauna. Although glyptodonts were an important component of Cenozoic South American faunas, their early evolution and phylogenetic affinities within the order Cingulata (armoured New World placental mammals) remain controversial. In this study, we used hybridization enrichment and high-throughput sequencing to obtain a partial mitochondrial genome from Doedicurus sp., the largest (1.5 m tall, and 4 m long) and one of the last surviving glyptodonts. Our molecular phylogenetic analyses revealed that glyptodonts fall within the diver- sity of living armadillos. Reanalysis of morphological data using a molecular ‘back- bone constraint’ revealed several morphological characters that supported a close relationship between glyptodonts and the tiny extant fairy armadillos (Chlamyphori- nae).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Macroevolution
    Spring, 2012 Phylogenetics 200A Modes of Macroevolution Macroevolution is used to refer to any evolutionary change at or above the level of species. Darwin illustrated the combined action of descent with modification, the principle of divergence, and extinction in the only figure in On the Origin of Species (Fig. 1), showing the link between microevolution and macroevolution. The New Synthesis sought to distance itself from the ‘origin of species’ (= macroevolution) and concentrated instead on microevolution - variation within populations and reproductive isolation. “Darwin’s principle of divergence derives from what he thought to be one of the most potent components of the struggle for existence. He argued that the strongest interactions would be among individuals within a population or among closely related populations or species, because these organisms have the most similar requirements. Darwin’s principle of divergence predicts that the individuals, populations or species most likely to succeed in the struggle are those that differ most from their close relatives in the way they achieve their needs for survival and reproduction.” (Reznick & Ricklefs 2009. Nature 457) Macroevolution also fell into disfavor with its invocation for hopeful monsters in development as well as its implication in some Neo-Lamarckian theories. Interest in macroevolution revived by several paleontologists including Steven Stanley, Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge, the latter two in the context of punctuated equilibrium. They proposed that what happens in evolution beyond the species level is due to processes that operate beyond the level of populations – including species selection. Niles Eldredge, in particular, has written extensively on the macroevolutionary hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals from Upper Pleistocene of Afrânio, Pernambuco, Northeast of Brazil
    Quaternary and Environmental Geosciences (2010) 02(2):01-11 Mamíferos do Pleistoceno Superior de Afrânio, Pernambuco, nordeste do Brasil Mammals from Upper Pleistocene of Afrânio, Pernambuco, northeast of Brazil Fabiana Marinho Silvaab, César Felipe Cordeiro Filgueirasac, Alcina Magnólia Franca Barretoad, Édison Vicente Oliveiraae a Universidade Federal de Pernambuco b c d e [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] RESUMO Os mamíferos pleistocênicos são encontrados com frequência em toda a região Nordeste do Brasil. Os fósseis em geral ocorrem em tanques, lagoas, terraços fluviais, cavernas e ravinas. No estado de Pernambuco são registradas ocorrências de mamíferos pleistocênicos em 38 municípios. Neste trabalho, foram estudados aspectos taxonômicos e tafonômicos de paleofauna, preservada em lagoas da bacia do riacho Caboclo, tributário do rio São Francisco, em Afrânio, Pernambuco, Brasil. A pesquisa envolveu levantamento bibliográfico, cartográfico, trabalhos de campo e laboratoriais. Mais de 1.250 ossos, dentes e osteodermos foram estudados. A associação fossilífera é monotípica, poliespecífica, com os graus de fragmentação e desgaste variando em quatro classes. Os ossos foram preservados por conservação da composição química original, permineralização e substituição por calcita e por calcita magnesiana. Foi identificada uma diversificada fauna distribuída em cinco ordens (Tardigrada, Cingulata, Notoungulata, Proboscidea e Perissodactyla), sete famílias (Megatheriidae, Mylodontidae, Dasypodidae, Glyptodontidae, Toxodontidae, Gomphotheriidae e Equidae) com os taxa: Eremotherium laurillardi, Mylodonopsis ibseni, Panochthus greslebini, Holmesina paulacoutoi, Hoplophorus euphractus, Stegomastodon waringi, Toxodon platensis, equídeo e gliptodontideo indeterminados. Foram registrados pela primeira vez em Pernambuco os gêneros Hoplophorus e Mylodonopsis. A paleofauna é predominantemente herbívora, de um paleoambiente de savana ou cerrado.
    [Show full text]
  • Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution Refers to Varieties Within a Given Type
    Chapter 8: Evolution Lesson 8.3: Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. Change happens within a group, but the descendant is clearly of the same type as the ancestor. This might better be called variation, or adaptation, but the changes are "horizontal" in effect, not "vertical." Such changes might be accomplished by "natural selection," in which a trait ​ ​ ​ ​ within the present variety is selected as the best for a given set of conditions, or accomplished by "artificial selection," such as when dog breeders produce a new breed of dog. Lesson Objectives ● Distinguish what is microevolution and how it affects changes in populations. ● Define gene pool, and explain how to calculate allele frequencies. ● State the Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● Identify the five forces of evolution. Vocabulary ● adaptive radiation ● gene pool ● migration ● allele frequency ● genetic drift ● mutation ● artificial selection ● Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● natural selection ● directional selection ● macroevolution ● population genetics ● disruptive selection ● microevolution ● stabilizing selection ● gene flow Introduction Darwin knew that heritable variations are needed for evolution to occur. However, he knew nothing about Mendel’s laws of genetics. Mendel’s laws were rediscovered in the early 1900s. Only then could scientists fully understand the process of evolution. Microevolution is how individual traits within a population change over time. In order for a population to change, some things must be assumed to be true. In other words, there must be some sort of process happening that causes microevolution. The five ways alleles within a population change over time are natural selection, migration (gene flow), mating, mutations, or genetic drift.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Geological Map of Patagonia
    Revista de la Asociación Geológica Argentina 64 (1): 55 - 59 (2009) 55 THE FIRST GEOLOGICAL MAP OF PATAGONIA Eduardo O. ZAPPETTINI and José MENDÍA Servicio Geológico Minero Argentino (SEGEMAR) - Av. Julio A. Roca 651 (1322) Buenos Aires Emails: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT This contribution analyses the first geological map of Patagonia drawn by Darwin around 1840, and colour-painted by Darwin himself. It had remained unpublished and only a small version in black and white had been printed before. The different units mapped by Darwin are analysed from a modern perspective, and his ability to show a synthesis of the complex geological structure of Patagonia is stressed. Keywords: Geological map, Patagonia, Patagonian Shingle, Darwin geologist. RESUMEN: El primer mapa geológico de la Patagonia. La presente contribución analiza el primer mapa geológico de la Patagonia reali- zado por Darwin cerca de 1840, pintado en colores por el mismo Darwin, que ha permanecido inédito y del que sólo se cono- cía una versión de tamaño reducido en blanco y negro. Se analizan las diferentes unidades mapeadas por Darwin desde una perspectiva actual, destacándose su habilidad para mostrar en esa síntesis la compleja estructura de la Patagonia. Palabras clave: Mapa geológico, Patagonia, Rodados Patagónicos, Darwin geólogo. DARWIN AND THE VOYAGE OF HMS BEAGLE At the time Charles Darwin set sail on board HMS Beagle on a journey that was to last two years and ended up lasting five, he was not more than an amateur naturalist that had quitted his medical courses and after that abandoned his in- tention of applying for a position in the Church of England, just to embrace the study of natural history.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Power of Phenotypic Selection in Nature
    Articles Patterns and Power of Phenotypic Selection in Nature JOEL G. KINGSOLVER AND DAVID W. PFENNIG Phenotypic selection occurs when individuals with certain characteristics produce more surviving offspring than individuals with other characteristics. Although selection is regarded as the chief engine of evolutionary change, scientists have only recently begun to measure its action in the wild. These studies raise numerous questions: How strong is selection, and do different types of traits experience different patterns of selection? Is selection on traits that affect mating success as strong as selection on traits that affect survival? Does selection tend to favor larger body size, and, if so, what are its consequences? We explore these questions and discuss the pitfalls and future prospects of measuring selection in natural populations. Keywords: adaptive landscape, Cope’s rule, natural selection, rapid evolution, sexual selection henotypic selection occurs when individuals with selection on traits that affect survival stronger than on those Pdifferent characteristics (i.e., different phenotypes) that affect only mating success? In this article, we explore these differ in their survival, fecundity, or mating success. The idea and other questions about the patterns and power of phe- of phenotypic selection traces back to Darwin and Wallace notypic selection in nature. (1858), and selection is widely accepted as the primary cause of adaptive evolution within natural populations.Yet Darwin What is selection, and how does it work? never attempted to measure selection in nature, and in the Selection is the nonrandom differential survival or repro- century following the publication of On the Origin of Species duction of phenotypically different individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Charles Darwin's Notebooks from the Voyage of the `Beagle`. Transcribed, Edited and Introduced by Gordon Chancellor and John
    Charles Darwin’s Notebooks from the Voyage of the `Beagle`. Transcribed, edited and introduced by Gordon Chancellor and John van Wythe. xxxiii + 615 pp. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2009. $ 150 (cloth). Until now, it has not been possible to read in book form the immediate notes that Darwin himself had written during his 1832-1836 voyage of H.M.S. Beagle. Darwin’s Beagle records comprised five different kinds: field notebooks, personal diary, geological and zoological diaries, and specimen catalogues. Unlike the many other documents that Darwin created during the voyage, the field notebooks are not confined to any one subject. They contain notes and observations on geology, zoology, botany, ecology, weather notes, barometer and thermometer readings, ethnography, archaeology, and linguistics as well as maps, drawings, financial records, shopping lists, reading notes, and personal entries. The editors described the notebooks as the most difficult and complex of all of Darwin’s manuscripts. They were for the most part written in pencil which was often faint or smeared. They were generally not written while sitting at a desk but held in one hand, on mule or horseback or on the deck of the Beagle. Furthermore the lines were very short and much was not written in complete sentences. Added to this, they were full of Darwin’s chaotic spelling of foreign names so the handwriting was sometimes very difficult to decipher. Alternative readings were often possible. Darwin did not number the pages of the notebooks, and often wrote in them at different times from opposite ends. Most of the notebook space was devoted to geological descriptions and drawings, a reflection of Darwin’s interest in the works of Charles Lyell and his previous fieldwork with Adam Sedgwick.
    [Show full text]
  • Tempo and Mode in the Macroevolutionary Reconstruction of Darwinism STEPHEN JAY GOULD Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
    Proc. Nadl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 6764-6771, July 1994 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at a coloquium ented "Tempo and Mode in Evolution" organized by Walter M. Fitch and Francisco J. Ayala, held January 27-29, 1994, by the National Academy of Sciences, in Irvine, CA. Tempo and mode in the macroevolutionary reconstruction of Darwinism STEPHEN JAY GOULD Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 ABSTRACT Among the several central nings of Dar- But conceptual complexity is not reducible to a formula or winism, his version ofLyellian uniformitranism-the extrap- epigram (as we taxonomists of life's diversity should know olationist commitment to viewing causes ofsmall-scale, observ- better than most). Too much ink has been wasted in vain able change in modern populations as the complete source, by attempts to define the essence ofDarwin's ideas, or Darwin- smooth extension through geological time, of all magnitudes ism itself. Mayr (1) has correctly emphasized that many and sequences in evolution-has most contributed to the causal different, if related, Darwinisms exist, both in the thought of hegemony of microevolutlon and the assumption that paleon- the eponym himself, and in the subsequent history of evo- tology can document the contingent history of life but cannot lutionary biology-ranging from natural selection, to genea- act as a domain of novel evolutionary theory. G. G. Simpson logical connection of all living beings, to gradualism of tried to combat this view of paleontology as theoretically inert change. in his classic work, Tempo and Mode in Evolution (1944), with It would therefore be fatuous to claim that any one legit- a brilliant argument that the two subjects of his tide fall into a imate "essence" can be more basic or important than an- unue paleontological domain and that modes (processes and other.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Large Mammal and Tortoise Extinction in South America
    Cione et al: Late Cenozoic extinction Rev.in South Mus. America Argentino Cienc. Nat., n.s.1 5(1): 000, 2003 Buenos Aires. ISSN 1514-5158 The Broken Zig-Zag: Late Cenozoic large mammal and tortoise extinction in South America Alberto L. CIONE1, Eduardo P. TONNI1, 2 & Leopoldo SOIBELZON1 1Departamento Científico Paleontología de Vertebrados, 'acultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. 2Laboratorio de Tritio y Radiocarbono, LATYR. 'acultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Paseo del Bosque, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Corresponding author: Alberto L. CIONE Abstract: During the latest Pleistocene-earliest Holocene, South American terrestrial vertebrate faunas suffered one of the largest (and probably the youngest) extinction in the world for this lapse. Megamammals, most of the large mammals and a giant terrestrial tortoise became extinct in the continent, and several complete ecological guilds and their predators disappeared. This mammal extinction had been attributed mainly to overkill, climatic change or a combination of both. We agree with the idea that human overhunting was the main cause of the extinction in South America. However, according to our interpretation, the slaughtering of mammals was accom- plished in a particular climatic, ecological and biogeographical frame. During most of the middle and late Pleis- tocene, dry and cold climate and open areas predominated in South America. Nearly all of those megamammals and large mammals that became extinct were adapted to this kind of environments. The periodic, though rela- tively short, interglacial increases in temperature and humidity may have provoked the dramatic shrinking of open areas and extreme reduction of the biomass (albeit not in diversity) of mammals adapted to open habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources on Charles Darwin, Evolution, and the Galapagos Islands: a Selected Bibliography
    Library and Information Services Division Current References 2009-1 The Year of Darwin 2009 Discovering Darwin at NOAA Central Library: Resources on Charles Darwin, Evolution, and the Galapagos Islands: A Selected Bibliography Prepared by Anna Fiolek and Kathleen A. Kelly U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service National Oceanographic Data Center NOAA Central Library October 2009 http://www.lib.noaa.gov/researchtools/subjectguides/darwinbib.pdf Contents: Preface …………………………………………………………………. p. 3 Acknowledgment ………………………………………………………. p. 4 I. Darwin Chronology ………………………………………………….. p. 5-6 II. Monographic Publications By or About Charles Darwin ………... p. 7-13 in the NOAA Central Library Network Catalog (NOAALINC) III. Internet Resources Related to Charles Darwin ……. ……………. p. 14-17 And His Science (Including online images and videos) IV. Darwin Science-related Journals in the NOAA Libraries’………. p. 17-18 Network 2 Preface This Bibliography has been prepared to support NOAA Central Library (NCL) outreach activities during the Year of Darwin 2009, including a “Discovering Darwin at NOAA Central Library” Exhibit. The Year of Darwin 2009 has been observed worldwide by libraries, museums, academic institutions and scientific publishers, to honor the 150th anniversary of On the Origin of Species and the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth. This Bibliography reflects the library’s unique print and online resources on Charles Darwin, Evolution, and the Galapagos Islands. It includes citations organized “by title” from NOAALINC, the library’s online catalog, and from the library’s historical collections. The data and listings are comprehensive from the 19th century to the present. The formats represented in this resource include printed monographs, serial publications, graphical materials, videos, online full-text documents, a related journal list, and Web resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Locomotory Adaptations in 3D Humerus Geometry of Xenarthra: Testing for Convergence
    LJMU Research Online Serio, C, Raia, P and Meloro, C Locomotory Adaptations in 3D Humerus Geometry of Xenarthra: Testing for Convergence http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/13020/ Article Citation (please note it is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from this work) Serio, C, Raia, P and Meloro, C (2020) Locomotory Adaptations in 3D Humerus Geometry of Xenarthra: Testing for Convergence. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8. ISSN 2296-701X LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. For more information please contact [email protected] http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/ fevo-08-00139 May 25, 2020 Time: 12:41 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 27 May 2020 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00139 Locomotory Adaptations in 3D Humerus Geometry of Xenarthra: Testing for Convergence Carmela Serio1, Pasquale Raia2 and Carlo Meloro1* 1 Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom, 2 Dipartimento Di Scienze Della Terra, Dell’Ambiente E Delle Risorse, Università degli Studi Di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy Three-dimensional (3D) models of fossil bones are increasingly available, thus opening a novel frontier in the study of organismal size and shape evolution.
    [Show full text]