Pacific Small Island States Evaluation Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Global Climate Change Alliance: Pacific Small Island States Evaluation Report PREPARED FOR Pacific Community 23 May 2016 REPORT PREPARED BY PACIFIC RESEARCH AND EVALUATION ASSOCIATES www.prea.com.au CORRESPONDENCE RELATED TO THIS REPORT SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO: NAME PHONE EMAIL Martin Pritchard +61 403 440 996 [email protected] Damien Sweeney +61 415 803 219 [email protected] VERSION CONTROL VERSION STATUS DATE 1.0 Draft- submitted to SPC 19/03/2015 1.1 Revisions from SPC- Dr. Gillian Cambers 28/03/2015 1.2 Second Draft – submitted to SPC and EU 01/04/2016 1.3 SPC feedback from GC, JU and EU from presentation 12/04/16 1.4 Third draft – circulated to countries, SPC and EU 14/04/16 1.5 Final version incorporating feedback from countries, 10/05/16 SPC and EU 1.6 New SPC logo. Integrate final feedback from SPC. 23/05/16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PREA acknowledges all the contributors to this report: the national coordinators and country-level project teams that were interviewed, other interviewees, and particularly the SPC GCCA: PSIS project team that gave their time to provide input and feedback to the report. Specific thanks to Dr. Gillian Cambers for her valuable comments on draft reports. DISCLAIMER Whilst care has been taken in the preparation of the material in this document to ensure its accuracy, Pacific Research And Evaluation Associates and other contributors do not warrant that the information contained in this document is error–free and, to the extent permissible under law, it will not be liable for any claim by any party acting on such information. COVER IMAGE CREDITS from left to right: New rainwater tank installed in Palau, D. Sweeney; Sedi-tunnel groynes in Tongatapu, M. Pritchard; Water quality monitoring at a community well in Kiribati, M. Pritchard. Acronyms and Abbreviations ACSE Adapting to Climate Change and Sustainable Energy project ADB Asian Development Bank AusAID Australian Agency for International Development CBA Cost-Benefit Analysis C-CAP Coastal Community Adaptation Project CCCA Climate Change Coordination Adviser CCCI Climate Change Cook Islands CCCPIR Coping with Climate Change in the Pacific Islands Region CCM Climate Change Matters CePaCT Centre for Pacific Crops and Trees CRGA Committee of Representatives of Governments and Administrations CROP Council for Regional Organisations in the Pacific DAC Development Assistance Committee DPCC Development Partners for Climate Change EDF European Development Fund EHU Kiribati Environmental Health Unit EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EPA Environmental Protection Agency EQPB Palau Environmental Quality Protection Board EU European Union EUD EU Delegation FFD First flush device FNU Fiji National University FSM Federated States of Micronesia GCCA Global Climate Change Alliance GCCA: PSIS Global Climate Change Alliance: Pacific Small Island States project GCF Green Climate Fund GIS Geographic Information System GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GSD Geo Sciences Division (SPC) HDPE High-density polyethylene IWRM Integrated Water Resources Management JNAP Joint National Action Plan for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management KAP Kiribati Adaptation Program KRA Key Result Area LFA Logical Framework Approach LRD Tuvalu Land Resource Division M&E monitoring and evaluation MFEM Ministry of Finance and Economic Management, Cook Islands MMR Ministry of Marine Resources Cook Islands MOPW Ministry of Public Works MTR Mid-term review NAPA National Adaptation Programmes of Action NDPB National Development Bank of Palau NGO Non-governmental organisation NIE National Implementing Entity to Adaptation Fund NISP Niue National Integrated Strategic Plan NUC Nauru Utilities Corporation NZAID New Zealand Agency for International Development OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OERC Palau’s Office of Environmental Response and Coordination PACC Pacific Adaptation to Climate Change project PCCP Pacific Climate Change Portal PCCR Pacific Climate Change Roundtable PDD Project Design Document PECF Pacific Environment Community Fund PET polyethylene terephthalate PET Polyethylene terephthalate PHD Public Health Division PICS Pacific Island countries PIFACC Pacific Islands Framework for Action on Climate Change PIFS Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat PMU Project Management Unit PPUC Palau Public Utilities Corporation PREL Pacific Resources for Education and Learning PREL Pacific Resources for Education and Learning PWCI Palau Water Conservation Initiative RFP Request for Proposal RMI Republic of Marshall Islands ROM Results Orientated Monitoring RONAdapt Republic of Nauru Adaptation to Climate Change and Disaster Risk Reduction Action Plan SCMs Steering Committee Meetings SCUBA Self-contained underwater breathing apparatus SIDS Small Island Developing States SODIS Solar disinfection of water SOP Standard Operating Procedures SPC Secretariat of the Pacific Community SPREP Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme SRDP Strategy for Climate and Disaster Resilient Development in the Pacific SRIC-CC Strengthening Resilience of our Islands and Communities SRIC-CC Strengthening the Resilience of our Islands and Our Communities to Climate Change Project (Cook Islands) STSISP South Tarawa Sanitation Improvement Sector Project TOR terms of reference TVET Technical Vocational Education and Training UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNICEF United Nations Children's Emergency Fund USAID United States Agency for International Development USP University of the South Pacific WARD CROP-CEO Working Arm on Climate Change and Disaster Resilient Development WASH Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene WHO World Health Organization Table of Contents 1. Executive summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Best practices arising from the GCCA: PSIS project ........................................................... 6 1.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 9 1.2.1 POST-PROJECT ............................................................................................................. 9 1.2.2 MOVING FORWARD ................................................................................................ 10 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 13 2.1 Project purpose and objective .......................................................................................... 13 2.2 Purpose of the evaluation ................................................................................................. 13 2.3 Evaluation objectives ........................................................................................................ 13 2.4 Scope of the evaluation ................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Evaluation methodology ................................................................................................. 14 2.5.1 Limitations................................................................................................................... 16 3. Findings .................................................................................................................................... 17 3.1 RELEVANCE: To what extent have the objectives of the GCCA: PSIS project been consistent with beneficiaries' requirements, country’ needs, global priorities and partners' EU's policies, and SPC’s Climate Change Engagement Strategy? ........................................................ 17 3.1.1 Mutual reinforcement (coherence) .............................................................................. 20 3.1.2 EC value added ............................................................................................................ 22 3.2 EFFECTIVENESS: To what extent has the GCCA: PSIS project attained, or is expected to attain, its specific objective(s)? .................................................................................................... 22 3.2.1 Factors that facilitated and hindered the achievement of project objectives ............... 29 3.3 IMPACT: To what extent has the GCCA: PSIS project supported the Governments of Cook Islands, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Tonga and Tuvalu, in their efforts to tackle the adverse effects of climate change?....................................... 33 3.3.1 Country level impacts .................................................................................................. 34 3.4 SUSTAINABILITY: To what extent will the project benefits in the targeted sectors be sustainable over the longer term (5 years)? ................................................................................. 36 3.5 EFFICIENCY: To what extent does the GCCA: PSIS project demonstrate timely implementation, sound financial management and value for money? ........................................ 41 3.5.1 Work planning and narrative reporting ........................................................................ 41 3.5.2 Funding allocation ....................................................................................................... 42 3.5.3 Financial management ................................................................................................ 43