Albert Gallatin, by John Austin Stevens 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Golden State Patriot a Newsletter of the Sons of the Revolution in the State of California
Golden State Patriot A Newsletter of the Sons of the Revolution in the State of California Spring www.srcalifornia.com 2007 Golden State Patriot Why We Celebrate Patriots Day The “shot heard 'round the world” continues to reverberate each April as the members of the Sons of the Revolution in the State of California gather to celebrate“Patriots Day” in honor of those who participated in the battles and skirmishes that began our fight for independence. Yes, we continue to take our “Patriots Day” observance seriously here in California. This year, like in years past, the Sons of the Revolution will commemorate the battles of Lexington and Concord during our Patriots Day CONTENTS Luncheon on Saturday, April 21. Patriots Day Most Americans have lost sight of this annual celebration. Here in President’s Message California, few even know of its celebration or the events surrounding the Washington’s Birthday Reception Patriots Day observance. Fraunces Tavern Museum Nevertheless, it was on the night of April 18, 1775, that, approximately 700 Annual Membership Luncheon British soldiers had gathered on Boston Common to prepare for a raid on A Tribute to a President American military arms and supplies stored in nearby Concord, that patriots Historian’s Corner Paul Revere and William Dawes, both residents of Boston, set out to warn John Austin Stevens - Founder their fellow colonists. Over the next 24 hours, a series of events ensued The Gift of History which took Massachusetts and the other twelve colonies one step closer to Society Welcomes Members Independence. Modernization Project Completed Washington - Braddock Campaign On the fateful morning of April 19, 1775, American colonists prepared to Roster of Officers and Directors confront the soldiers of the British Army who were soon to arrive at the Meeting Schedule Massachusetts town of Lexington. -
A North Carolina Monastery
1 ?*,-&. XXIX. FEBRUARY, ,1893. No. 2. MAGAZINE OF AMERICAN HISTORY -•€*"..- & 'S>**&% A MONTHLY ILLUSTRATED JOURNAL AMi >2s2yj ftMJR DOLLARS TH1HTT FIVE CENTS PER ANNUM PER COPYy THE 'paniV' 5^. NewYorK Copyright, 1893, by National History Company. — : — —— — JOSEPH GILLOTT'S STEEL PENS THE MOST PERFECT OF PENS. * a. m 2 The most important literary event of the season. New York Advertiser. en SSI - to NOW READY. THE THIRD VOLUME OF THE 7& Memorial History of the Qty of New York. f The Most Elaborate "Work Ever Prepared on an American City. To be completed in four royal octavo volumes of about 6oo pages each and illustrated with not less than iooo portraits, views of historic houses, scenes, statues, tombs, monu- ments, maps, and fac-similes of autographs and ancient documents. The work will be printed by the De Vinne Press, which is equivalent to saying that so far as presswork, illustrations and general manufacture are concerned it will be unsurpassed by any publication ever issued in New York. The entire work will be edited by Gen. James Grant Wilson, with the co-operation of the following well-known and scholarly writers, all of whom will contribute one or more chapters Mr. Moncure D. Conway. Mr. William Nelson. Hon. Charles P. Daly. Bishop Henry C. Potter. Gen. Emmons Clark. Gen. T. F. Rodenbough, U.S.A. Rev. B. F. De Costa, D.D. Hon. Theodore Roosevelt. Rev. Morgan Dix, S.T.D. Mr. Edward Manning Ruttenber. Mr. Berthold Fernow. Mr. Frederick Saunders. Mr. Robert Ludlow Fowler. Mr. John Austin Stevens. Hon. James W. -
Congressmen 1788-1838
8th Congress U. S. Congressional Election 12 October 1802 1803-1805 Name Party Vote Name Party Vote 1st District (3 elected): 4th District (2 elected): 11th District: Joseph Clay Dem-Rep 4,363 John A. Hanna Dem-Rep 6,110 John B. Lucas Dem-Rep 2,168 Jacob Richards Dem-Rep 4,316 David Bard Dem-Rep 5,970 John Wilkins Federalist 1,624 Michael Leib Dem-Rep 3,980 David Mitchell Dem-Rep 28 Alexander Foster Federalist 638 George Latimer Federalist 2,895 5th District: Peter Brown Federalist 2,875 Andrew Gregg Dem-Rep 4,258 Jonas Preston Federalist 2,847 Elisha Gordon Federalist 304 6th District: John Stewart Dem-Rep 2,285 2nd District (3 elected): John Edie Federalist 1,748 Robert Brown Dem-Rep 11,456 7th District: Isaac Van Horne Dem-Rep 10,697 John Rea Dem-Rep 2,173 Frederick Conrad Dem-Rep 6,205 Henry Woods Federalist 941 Samuel Sitgreaves Federalist 3,939 John McLene Dem-Rep 147 Nathaniel B. Borleau Federalist 1,682 Lord Butler Federalist 781 8th District: William Findley Dem-Rep 1,531 3rd District (3 elected): Jacob Painter Dem-Rep 1,312 John Whitehill Dem-Rep 9,396 Special Election Isaac Anderson Dem-Rep 9,365 9th District: 2 November 1804 Joseph Hiester Dem-Rep 9,236 John Smilie Dem-Rep 2,718 10th District: Jacob Bower Federalist 4,932 10th District: John Hoge Federalist 477 Joseph Hemphill Federalist 4,853 William Hoge Dem-Rep 2,300 Aaron Lyle Dem-Rep 439 Thomas Boude Federalist 4,829 Resigned 15 October 1804. -
THE Whiskey Insurrection of 1794 Long Has Been Regarded As One of the Decisive Events in Early American History
THE WHISKEY INSURRECTION: A RE-EVALUATION By JACOB E. COOKE* THE Whiskey Insurrection of 1794 long has been regarded as one of the decisive events in early American history. But on the question of why it was significant there has been a century and a half of disagreement. Fortunately for the historian, how- ever, there have not been many interpretations; indeed, there have been only two. And, as anyone would guess, these have been the Federalist and the anti-Federalist, the Hamiltonian and the Jeffersonian. It is not the purpose of this paper to describe the fluctuating historical reputations of Jefferson and Hamilton; at one period of time (say, *the Jacksonian era) Jefferson was in the ascendancy; at another time (say, the post-Civil War period) Hamilton crowded Jefferson out of the American historical hall of fame. But for the past half-century and longer, the interpretation that our historians have given to the American past has been predi- cated on a Jeffersonian bias, and the Whiskey Insurrection is no exception. The generally accepted interpretation of the Whiskey Insur- rection reads something like this: In March, 1791, under the prodding of Alexander Hamilton and against the opposition of the Westerners and some Southerners, Congress levied an excise tax on whiskey. This measure was an integral part of Hamilton's financial plan, a plan which was designed to soak the farmer and to spare the rich. There was sporadic opposition to the excise in several parts of the country, but the seat of opposition was in the four western counties of Pennsylvania. -
Convention of 1818 Between the United States and Great Britian Art 1 Art 2 Art 3 Art 4 Art 5 Art 6
Convention of 1818 between the United States and Great Britian Art 1 Art 2 Art 3 Art 4 Art 5 Art 6 The United States of America, and His Majesty The King of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, desirous to cement the good Understanding which happily subsists between them, have, for that purpose, named their respective Plenipotentiaries, that is to say: The President of the United States, on his part, has appointed, Albert Gallatin, Their Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to the Court of France; and Richard Rush, Their Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary to the Court of His Britannic Majesty: And His Majesty has appointed The Right Honorable Frederick John Robinson, Treasurer of His Majesty's Navy, and President of the Committee of Privy Council for Trade and Plantations; and Henry Goulburn Esquire, One of His Majesty's Under Secretaries of State: Who, after having exchanged their respective Full Powers, found to be in due and proper Form, have agreed to and concluded the following Articles. ARTICLE I. Whereas differences have arisen respecting the Liberty claimed by the United States for the Inhabitants thereof, to take, dry, and cure Fish on certain Coasts, Bays, Harbours, and Creeks of His Britannic Majesty's Dominions in America, it is agreed between The High Contracting Parties, that the Inhabitants of the said United States shall have for ever, in common with the Subjects of His Britannic Majesty, the Liberty to take Fish of every kind on that part of the Southern Coast of Newfoundland which -
Origins of Federal Common Law: Part Two*
University of Pennsylvania Law Review FOUNDED 1852 Formerly American Law Register VOL. 133 JULY 1985 No. 6 ORIGINS OF FEDERAL COMMON LAW: PART TWO* STEWART JAYt Thomas Jefferson wrote Edmund Randolph in August 1799 of the need "to portray at full length the consequences of this new doctrine, that the common law is the law of the US, & that their courts have, of course, jurisdiction co-extensive with that law, that is to say, general over all cases & persons." 1 Closing the letter in the next line, he re- marked, "But, great heavens! Who could have conceived in 1789 that within ten years we should have to combat such wind-mills." 2 Some- what more than a year later, John Marshall commented in a private correspondence: In political controversy it often happens that the precise opinion of the adversary is not understood, & that we are at much labor to disprove propositions which have never been maintained. A stronger evidence of this cannot I think be given than the manner in which the references to the com- mon law have been treated.' © Copyright 1985 by Stewart Jay. All rights reserved. * Part One of this essay appears at 133 U. PA. L. REv. 1003 (1985) [hereinafter cited as Jay, Part One]. t Associate Professor of Law, University of Washington. 1 Letter from Thomas Jefferson to Edmund Randolph (Aug. 23, 1799), reprinted in 9 THE WORKS OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 76 (P. Ford ed. 1905). 2 Id. at 76-77. " Letter from John Marshall to St. George Tucker (Nov. 27, 1800), reprinted in Appendix A, infra. -
PENNSYLVANIA- Other Indentified Schools (PDF)
State Name LEA Name LEA NCES ID School Name School NCES ID Reading Proficiency Target Reading Participation Target Math Proficiency Target Math Participation Target Elementary/ Middle School Other Academic Indicator Target Graduation Rate Target State Defined School Improvement Status Title I School PENNSYLVANIA Bedford County Technical Center 4200001 Bedford County Technical Center 420000107136 All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Susquehanna County CTC 4200003 Susquehanna County CTC 420000307138 All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Fulton County AVTS 4200007 Fulton County AVTS 420000707253 Not All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Chester Co Family Academy CS 4200012 Chester Co Family Academy CS 420001200311 All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Youth Build Phila CS 4200016 Youth Build Phila CS 420001600324 Not All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Centre Learning Community CS 4200023 Centre Learning Community CS 420002300350 All All All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Nittany Valley CS 4200024 Nittany Valley CS 420002400352 All All All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Susq-Cyber CS 4200028 Susq-Cyber CS 420002800368 Not All All Not All Not All Status 2 Title I targeted assistance school PENNSYLVANIA Wonderland CS 4200047 Wonderland CS 420004700445 All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Spectrum CS 4200064 Spectrum CS 420006400530 All Status 2 Not a Title I school PENNSYLVANIA Bucks County Montessori CS 4200069 Bucks County Montessori CS 420006900562 All All -
The Second Amendment in Action
Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 76 Issue 1 Symposium on the Second Amendment: Article 4 Fresh Looks October 2000 The Second Amendment in Action Michael A. Bellesiles Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Michael A. Bellesiles, The Second Amendment in Action, 76 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 61 (2000). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol76/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN ACTION MICHAEL A. BELLESILES* INTRODUCTION What follows may be entirely irrelevant. There are those who argue that historical inquiry offers nothing to our understanding of the Second Amendment. This postmodernist position is well represented by Charlton Heston, who has dismissed historical scholarship as not in the least bit relevant and called for historians to stop wasting their time in the archives.1 Akhil Amar recently stated that current understandings of the original meaning of the Second Amendment "might be false as a matter of historical fact but [are] nonetheless true as a matter of constitutional law."' 2 William Van Alstyne insists that historical research into the context of the Second Amendment "doesn't seem to me to make a very great deal of difference against the background of Bunker Hill, and the minutemen, and the imagery that this is the nature of things."3 Postmodernism denies the value and even the validity of historical context, emphasizing instead language and image; truth itself is a rhetorical social construct, it is the critic's representation of the past that matters. -
Albert Gallatin: Champion of American Democracy
Albert Gallatin: Champion of American Democracy Friendship Hill National Historic Site Education Guide Post-Visit Activities Post-Visit Activities Post-Visit Activity #1 – Comic Strip Directions: Have students look over several comic strips in the newspaper and look up the definition of the word cartoon. Have them draw or illustrate their own comic strip about Albert Gallatin. The students can base their comic strip on their visit to Friendship Hill, and what they have read and learned about Albert Gallatin. Post-Visit Activity #2 – Headline News Directions: After studying about the Lewis and Clark expedition and Albert Gallatin, have the students make up headlines about the event. Write several of the headlines on the classroom board. Have the students pick a headline and write a short newspaper account about it. The students may read their news articles to the class. Post-Visit Activity #3 – Whiskey Rebellion Flag Directions: The angry farmers in 1794 designed a Whiskey Rebellion flag with symbols that expressed their feelings. Have the students construct or draw their own flags with symbols, designs and logos that express their feelings. Display the flags in the classroom. Have the students examine each other’s flags and see if they can tell what the flags mean. Post-Visit Activity #4 – Artist Poster Directions: Have the students design a poster of young Albert Gallatin using the objects that symbolize his early involvement in Southwestern Pennsylvania and the United States government. Post-Visit Activity #5 – Albert Gallatin Bulletin Board Directions: Throughout his 68 years of public service Albert Gallatin became friends with many influential people. -
Valley Forge Map
Episode 7, 2012: Valley Forge Map Ruth Taylor: I'm Ruth Taylor. I'm the Executive Director of the Newport Historical Society in Rhode Island. It has about 10,000 objects, documenting Newport history from 1640, literally, until today. John Austin Stevens was actually a New Yorker who ended up dying in Newport. His papers were donated to us by his daughter in the 1940's. All kinds of bits and pieces. And then we noticed this obviously older paper. When we unfolded it, the hair stood up on the back of my neck. I could see the Schuylkill River labeled, and it became clear that it was a map of Washington's encampment at Valley Forge. My very first thought was, "Do people know about this? Is this what it appears to be?" Wes Cowan: Well, let's – let's take a look at what you've got here. I'm – I'm pretty excited about this. Schuylkill River. Ruth: Here, take a look over here. Wes: Valley Forge River... Wow. Ruth: And there's the actual forge, right there. Wes: You’re telling me that this is the plan of the camp at Valley Forge. Ruth: Well, it appears to be. Wes: What do you know about where it came from? Ruth: It was found with the John Austin Stevens papers. He was a descendent of a Continental Army officer. He became fascinated with the American Revolution. Wes: How long have you had it? Ruth: Well, we've had it since the 1940's, but apparently we've only known about it since I found it last summer. -
The Congressional Debate Over US Participation in The
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Opus: Research and Creativity at IPFW Indiana University - Purdue University Fort Wayne Opus: Research & Creativity at IPFW History Faculty Publications Department of History 11-2006 “The onC gressional Debate over U.S. Participation in the Congress of Panama, 1825-1826: Washington’s Farewell Address, Monroe’s Doctrine, and the Fundamental Principles of U.S. Foreign Policy” Jeffrey J. Malanson [email protected] This research is a product of the Department of History faculty at Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne. Follow this and additional works at: http://opus.ipfw.edu/history_facpubs Part of the History Commons Opus Citation Jeffrey J. Malanson (2006). “The onC gressional Debate over U.S. Participation in the Congress of Panama, 1825-1826: Washington’s Farewell Address, Monroe’s Doctrine, and the Fundamental Principles of U.S. Foreign Policy”. Diplomatic History.30 (5), 813-838. http://opus.ipfw.edu/history_facpubs/82 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at Opus: Research & Creativity at IPFW. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Opus: Research & Creativity at IPFW. For more information, please contact [email protected]. jeffrey j. malanson The Congressional Debate over U.S. Participation in the Congress of Panama, 1825–1826: Washington’s Farewell Address, Monroe’s Doctrine, and the Fundamental Principles of U.S. Foreign Policy When Simón Bolívar resolved in December 1824 to call a grand meeting of representatives from the independent republics of the Americas to meet at the Isthmus of Panama, he had no intention of inviting the United States to attend. -
James Buchanan As Savior? Judicial Power, Political Fragmentation, and the Failed 1831 Repeal of Section 25
MARK A. GRABER* James Buchanan as Savior? Judicial Power, Political Fragmentation, and the Failed 1831 Repeal of Section 25 A ntebellum Americans anticipated contemporary political science when they complained about the tendency of embattled political elites to take refuge in the judiciary. Recent scholarship on comparative judicial politics suggests that judicial review is a means by which constitutional framers provided protection for certain class interests that may no longer be fully protected in legislative settings. Tom Ginsburg claims, "[I]f they foresee themselves losing in postconstitutional elections," the politicians responsible for the constitution "may seek to entrench judicial review as a form of political insurance." 1 Such a constitutional design ensures "[e]ven if they lose the election, they will be able to have some access to a forum in which to challenge the legislature."2 In 1801, Thomas Jefferson foreshadowed this strategy. He asserted that the defeated Federalist Party had "retired into the judiciary as a stronghold ...and from that battery all the works of republicanism are to be beaten down and erased.",3 More than a half century later, Chief Justice David S. *Professor of Law and Government, University of Maryland School of Law. This Article was written while the author was the 2008-09 Wayne Morse Chair at the University of Oregon School of Law. I am grateful to the Morse Foundation, Margaret Hallock, and Elizabeth Weber for their remarkable support. I am also grateful to numerous colleagues at the University of Maryland School of Law and elsewhere who read and commented on what follows without giggling too much.