Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji's Slanderous Lie on Imam Malik
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
In Defence of the Sunn ī Creed and Manhaj Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji’s Slanderous Lie on Imam Malik Abū Khuzaimah Anṣārī salafi Research Institute 2021 Salafi Research Institute é ! © Copyright 2021 Salafi Research Institute Exposing Deobandi bro hajji’s slanderous lie on imam malik Compiled, Translated & Annotated Abū Khuzaimah Anṣārī 1st Edn. © [SRI] Salafi Research Institute Shawwal 1442H / May 2021 All rights reserved No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, No known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, without prior Permission from the publishers or authors. Salafiri.com 2 salafiri.com salafiri.com Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji’s Slanderous lie on Imam Malik In defence of the sunn ī creed and manhaj Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji’s Slanderous Lie on Imam Malik Compiled, Translated and Annotated Abū Khuzaimah Anṣārī Salafi Research Institute L O N D O N - B I R M I N G H A M - L A H O R E Salafiri.com 3 salafiri.com salafiri.com salafi Research Institute 2021 Contents Page Introduction 5 The First Problem 8 The Second Problem 9 The View of Ibn Ma’in 9 Imams al-Bukhari and Ibn Abi Hatim 12 Imam ad-Dhahabi 14 Hafiz Ibn Hajr 15 Imam al-Hakim and his Leniency 17 Salafiri.com 4 salafiri.com salafiri.com Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji’s Slanderous lie on Imam Malik ʿAudhu Billāhi min ash-Shayṭān al-Rajīm Bismillāh al-Raḥmān al-Raḥīm Alḥamdullilāhi Rabbil ʿAlamīn, Waṣalatu Wassalām ʿAla Rasūlillahil Karīm, Wa ʿAla Alihī Wa Aṣḥābīhi Wa Man Tabiāhum Bi-Eḥsan Ilaʾ Yaum al-Dīn; Wa Baʿd All Praise belongs and is directed to the Rabb of everything that exists, Praise and Salutations be upon His Final beloved Messenger, his revered family and his noble Companions and upon those who follow them in good until the end of times, To proceed, Introduction This is the fifth reply in the series on Bro Hajji’s distortion of the truth and matters pertaining to the unified position of Ahlus Sunnah on Khuruj or rebellion. In addition to these replies, I have answered many of his points on our forum, Forum.Salafiri.com and twitter. The previous replies can be found on our website, and they are as follows, Tremendous Advice of the Salaf for Bro Hajji; ‘Saved Sect Syndrome’ https://www.salafiri.com/tremendous-advice-of-the-salaf-for-bro- hajji-saved-sect-syndrome/ Salafiri.com 5 salafiri.com salafiri.com salafi Research Institute 2021 Breaking Down and Dismantling Bro Hajji https://www.salafiri.com/breaking-down-and-dismantling-bro- hajji/ Outrageous and Lame, Destroying the Neo-Khariji Bro Hajji’s Claim https://www.salafiri.com/outrageous-and-lame-destroying-the- neo-khariji-bro-hajjis-claim/ Demolishing and Mutilating Bro Hajji – Oh The Shame; Expanding on Outrageously Lame, Destroying the Neo- Khariji Bro Hajji’s Claim https://www.salafiri.com/demolishing-and-mutilating-bro-hajji- oh-the-shame-expanding-on-outrageously-lame-destroying-the- neo-khariji-bro-hajjis-claim/ This fifth reply answers Bro Hajji’s distortion that Imam Malik Rahimahullah allowed rebellion and deemed revolt against an unjust ruler to be permissible. I have already, very clearly presented the ignorance of Bro Hajji, his desecration and violation of hadith sciences and al-Jarh Wa’t Ta’dil. However, despite universal embarrassment and utter humiliation at the lack of his knowledge, he remains defiant and stubborn in his little make belief world of Youtube! This is more so on account of some comments and thumbs up by unknowns, which have massaged his ego, despite his abysmal failure in all other ventures. Let us now move on to refute this distortion and the ignorance of Bro Hajji. Salafiri.com 6 salafiri.com salafiri.com Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji’s Slanderous lie on Imam Malik A circulating document was shared with me that lists the evidence and statements for rebelling against an unjust ruler. This document seems to be a summarised transcription of the ill researched and uneducated speech of Bro Hajji. Point 27 of this document alleges Imam Malik allowed rebellion against an unjust ruler and the document reads, 27. Imam Malik deemed it appropriate to revolt against (an) unjust ruler and tyrannical rulers. Imam Ibn Jarir reported that when he issued a verdict to the people in favour of the actions of Muhammad bin Abdullah al-Hasan, who revolted in the year 145 Hijri, he was told “On our conscious is allegiance to al-Mansur.” He said, “You were forced to swear and allegiance cannot be compelled.” Here ends his words as reported in Ibn Kathirs book al-Bidayah wal Nihaya. Bro Hajji used this report of Imam Malik to prove he allowed and believed it was permissible to rebel and revolt against an unjust ruler. The report used by Bro Hajji in in Tarikh at- Tabari1 1 Tarikh at-Tabari 6:491. 1st edn. (Beirut: Mawsu’ah al-A’lami lil- Matbu’at, 1418/1998) ed. Abd al-A’la Maha. Salafiri.com 7 salafiri.com salafiri.com salafi Research Institute 2021 NOTE: Sa’id is a typographical error, and it should be Sa’d which is clear from the books of Rijal and Tarikh. And transmitted Sa’d b. Abdul Hamid b. Ja’far b. Abdullah b. al-Hakam b. Sinan al-Hakami, the brother of the Ansar. He said, I have been informed by MORE THAN ONE PERSON on the authority of Malik b. Anas who was asked about rebelling with Muhammad. It was said to him (i.e. Malik), “We have given the oath of allegiance (i.e. it is around our necks) to Abu Ja’far.” Malik responded, “You gave the allegiance under compulsion which is not binding upon everyone when they are coerced. The people then hurried to Muhammad (to join him) but Malik stayed at home. There are two central problems with this report and both problems render it weak, as the problem relates to reporters in the chain. The First Problem The chain is disconnected and there is no clear information on who actually reported this from Imam Malik. Since in the science of hadith, it is not acceptable because the requirements are for the names in the chain to be mentioned, i.e. who reported the incident. The usage of the words, “more than one person” is unclear and therefore the chain is disconnected. This then ultimately renders the chain weak. This in the science of hadith is known as Jahalatur-Rawi, such a problem is serious which renders the report weak. The narrator(s) is majhul i.e. unknown and therefore it falls under the ruling of majhul ul-Ayn. Salafiri.com 8 salafiri.com salafiri.com Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji’s Slanderous lie on Imam Malik The report despite mentioning “more than one person narrated this” does not add any weight to the argument but rather it weakens it because if there were more than one person, naming them should be easier. The Second Problem The serious problem is the weakness of Sa’d b. Abdul Hamid, who is a narrator of this report. He was classified weak by the scholars of Hadith and Rijal. Imam Ibn Abi Hatim said, My father met him, but he did not write hadith from him, and I heard my father say this.2 The View of Imam Ibn Ma’in Imam Ibn Ma’in has several statements concerning him. Ibn Junayd asked Imam Ibn Ma’in about Sa’d b. Abdul Hamid. He said, There is no harm in him, I wrote hadith from him.3 2 Al-Jarh Wa’t Ta’dil 4:92 no.402. 1st edition (Hyderabad: Da’irah Ma’rif Uthmaniyyah, 1372H/1952) 3 Suwalat al-Junayd Li-Ibn Ma’in no.676, part of Mawsu’a Tarikh Yahya ibn Ma’in 2:340. Mawsu’a Khamsu Riwayatin. 1st edn. (Beirut: DKI, 2011) ed. Muhammad Sayyid Uthman. Also, in Mawsu’a Aqwal Yahya ibn Ma’in Fir Rijal al-Hadith Wa Ilayhi 2:150 no.1329. 1st edn. (Tunisia: Dar al-Gharb al-Islami, 1430H/2009) ed. Bashar A’wad Ma’ruf, Jihad Salafiri.com 9 salafiri.com salafiri.com salafi Research Institute 2021 Ibn Junayd said, A man said to Yahya b. Ma’in, I heard a hadith from Sa’d b. Abdul Hamid? He replied, “There is no harm in him, and he would hear hadith casually”.4 Muhanna b. Yahya said, I asked Ahmad b. Hanbal, Abu Khaythamah and Yahya b. Ma’in (about) Abu Mu’adh Sa’d b. Abdul Hamid b. Ja’far? They said, “He is Ibn Abdul Hamid b. Ja’far al-Madani? So, I said, “How is his affair”? They said he is here in the suburbs of the Ansar, and he claims to have casually heard the books of Malik b. Anas”!5 The wording of Imam Khatib al-Baghdadi adds, Ahmad said to me the people refute and reject this (his claims) since he was here in Baghdad and he did not perform Hajj, so how could he have heard from Malik casually?6 Mahmud Khalil and Mahmud Muhammad Khalil. Tarikh Baghdad 7:207. 4 Suwalat al-Junayd Li-Ibn Ma’in 2:341 no.690 (Mawsu’a), 2:151 no.1329 (Mawsu’a Aqwal). 5 (Mawsu’a Aqwal) 2:151 no.1329, Tarikh Baghdad 7:206 no.4741, Tahdhib al-Kamal 10:286-287, Tahdhib ut-Tahdhib 1:695. 6 Tarikh Baghdad 7:206. 1st edn. (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2004) ed. Sidqi Jamil al-A’ttar. Salafiri.com 10 salafiri.com salafiri.com Exposing Deobandi Bro Hajji’s Slanderous lie on Imam Malik We know when Imam Ibn Ma’in says, “There is no harm in him” it means the narrator is authentic according to him.