DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Commons Official Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Commons Official Report Thursday Volume 669 9 January 2020 No. 7 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 9 January 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 585 9 JANUARY 2020 586 Kate Griffiths: Does my right hon. Friend agree that House of Commons to mark our leaving the European Union, our fantastic local breweries in Burton-on-Trent should brew a celebratory Brexit beer? Thursday 9 January 2020 Hon. Members: Hear, hear! The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Steve Barclay: From the reaction of the House, it seems my hon. Friend has struck an extremely positive note in one of her first contributions. I again welcome PRAYERS her to the House. I know her constituency is famed for its beer, and I am sure that many Members would welcome those breweries celebrating this occasion in [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] such a way, just as I would welcome the fantastic Elgood’s Brewery doing so, which sits in my constituency. Mark Logan: Will my right hon. Friend consider the Oral Answers to Questions idea, as a lot of my constituents have, of commemorating this day of real constitutional importance by having an anniversary on the date every year? EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION Steve Barclay: I very much welcome my hon. Friend to his place, not least as a fellow Lancastrian; I am sure Mr Speaker knows of our Lancastrian pride. He brings an important suggestion. Again, it is all part of marking The Secretary of State was asked— this significant moment in our national history. Marking Exit Day Daniel Kawczynski: Will my right hon. Friend 1. Andy Carter (Warrington South) (Con): What acknowledge that 31 January is a significant day not plans the Government have to mark the UK leaving the only for us here in the United Kingdom but for hundreds EU on 31 January 2020. [900000] of millions of Eurosceptics across the continent of Europe who share concerns about the direction of travel 11. Kate Griffiths (Burton) (Con): What plans the of the European Union, including many citizens in my Government have to mark the UK leaving the EU on country of birth, Poland? Does he agree that it is 31 January 2020. [900011] important for us to celebrate this day very publicly, as a nation, to give a guiding principle to others in Europe 17. Mark Logan (Bolton North East) (Con): What that there is life outside the European Union? plans the Government have to mark the UK leaving the EU on 31 January 2020. [900017] Steve Barclay: My hon. Friend is right to draw attention to the fact that this is an important day not just for our 18. Daniel Kawczynski (Shrewsbury and Atcham) own citizens but for many elsewhere who recognise the (Con): What plans the Government have to mark the importance of this event in terms of democracy and UK leaving the EU on 31 January 2020. [900018] respecting the democratic decisions that people take, rather than overturning them, as has sometimes been The Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union the intention in the past. He has always been a champion (Steve Barclay): I begin by congratulating my hon. of close ties between the UK and Poland, and I think Friend on his election to the seat of Warrington South. that whatever celebrations there are will continue in that I look forward to his advocacy on issues relating to our vein. exit from the European Union. We stand ready to work with businesses up and down the country as we mark an Hilary Benn (Leeds Central) (Lab): Do the Government’s important moment in our national history: leaving the plans for the end of this month still include the abolition European Union on 31 January. of the right hon. Gentleman’s Department? If so, which Department and which Minister will take responsibility Andy Carter: How will my right hon. Friend ensure for the very important negotiations that are about to that small businesses, which have been, and are, the begin? engine of growth in my constituency, are able to share in the benefits of leaving the EU and in celebrating our Steve Barclay: I pay tribute to the work of the right departure on 31 January? hon. Gentleman during his tenure as chair of the Exiting the European Union Committee. He knows from his Steve Barclay: Before coming to the House, my hon. time in Government that machinery of government Friend was a champion of small businesses in Warrington, changes are announced in the usual way by the Prime and I know he will continue to be so during his time in Minister, and No. 10 has signalled that it intends to do this place. The best way that we will support businesses so. He should also be aware, because we publicly stated in his constituency is by having control of our money, it, that the Department will draw to a close to mark our borders and laws. That is what our exit from the European exit. It is the Department for Exiting the European Union does, and that is what he should rightly celebrate Union, and we will have exited and done the job of the on 31 January. Department when we leave on 31 January. 587 Oral Answers 9 JANUARY 2020 Oral Answers 588 Mr Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) (Lab/Co-op): I £1 million is specifically for the settlement scheme, as I welcome the Secretary of State back to this House. We am sure the Minister for Security detailed in Committee have always got on very well, and he is much cleverer on Tuesday, and there have been 2.6 million or 2.8 million than me, but I do have a couple of degrees in economics. or so applications, so the scheme is working very effectively When the President of the European Commission comes free of charge. But the hon. Member is right that some here and says that in any deal, if we do not have free people will have concerns, and one thing that the European movement of labour we will not get free movement of Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill does is guarantee goods and services, is that not something that we should the rights of citizens and address many of the concerns all be very sad about as we leave the European Union? that some of his constituents have shared. Steve Barclay: I am always grateful to the hon. Gentleman Sir John Hayes (South Holland and The Deepings) for how he champions his constituents and raises thoughtful (Con): In celebration of this important occasion in our points. He is quite right to pick up on what I thought nation’s history, will the Secretary of State arrange for was a constructive speech from the European Commission Union flags to be flown from all public buildings across President at the London School of Economics yesterday our kingdom? That would be a fitting tribute to the and to draw the House’s attention to it. What I took decision the British people made to leave the European away from her speech was her language about wanting a Union. We will remain unafraid of our patriotism, very ambitious partnership—she referred to unabashed about our departure and unwavering in our “old friends and new beginnings” determination to make our future even greater. and drew on her own time in London and how much Steve Barclay: I know that, like me, my parliamentary she enjoyed it and valued the United Kingdom. She neighbour always takes pride in seeing our Union Jack wanted to see a close partnership, whether on climate flown, and any opportunity to do so is one that he and I change, security or many other issues on which we have would always celebrate. Given my right hon. Friend’s values in common with our neighbours. penchant for poetry, I cannot be alone in thinking that such an occasion might inspire him in due course to Patrick Grady (Glasgow North) (SNP): Will the write something fitting. Government confirm whether they are going to request the chiming of Big Ben to mark 11 pm on 31 January? Tim Farron (Westmorland and Lonsdale) (LD): Even This is not going to be a moment of celebration for the most ardent supporter of Brexit will, I am sure, many people across the UK; it will be a moment of share a concern that the UK’s departure from the considerable concern, not least for my constituents who European Union might be depicted as representing are European Union nationals. Perhaps we should be insularity and nationalism. It is therefore important asking the Government: if they do want to hear the bell that we dispel that sense, and one way in which we could chime, for whom will the bell toll? do so is to sign up long term to the vulnerable refugees resettlement scheme and, indeed, to accept in full the Steve Barclay: I welcome this late conversion on the Dubs amendment and do our best by the most vulnerable part of the Scottish National party to celebrating our people on this planet, child refugees. exit and having Big Ben chime. As the hon. Gentleman will know, a decision as to whether Big Ben should Steve Barclay: I absolutely agree with the first part of bong or not is one for the House authorities and I the hon. Gentleman’s question. A big part of why I and would not dare to step in to such terrain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2003 Assembly Election Results
    Research Paper 03/072 May 2003 2003 Assembly Election Results Members’ Research Service Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil Research Paper 03/072 2003 Assembly Election Results Contents Part Page 1 Summary 1 2 Share of vote 1 3 Individual Members 2 4 Results by region 4 5 Votes cast 5 6 Turnout 6 7 Majorities 6 8 Women Members 6 Sources 7 Annexes Maps 8 Research Paper 03/0072/SML Date: 2 May 2003 This document has been prepared by the Members’ Research Service of the National Assembly for Wales for the purpose of providing information and for no other purpose. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information is accurate but no responsibility can be accepted by the National Assembly for Wales for any error or inaccuracy which it may contain. It does not constitute an expression of opinion by the National Assembly for Wales or any of its constituent parts or connected bodies. Any statistics or estimates included should not be regarded as official figures unless stated otherwise. Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil THE 2003 ASSEMBLY ELECTION RESULTS This statistical note draws together information on the results of the election to the National Assembly for Wales on 1 May 2003 and provides some comparisons with results from the previous Assembly election in 1999 and with recent General Election results. The figures have been taken from a number of sources. 1 SUMMARY The overall picture of seats won by each party in May 2003 is given in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Decarbonising Aid: Why We Must Stop UK Financing for Fossil Fuels Overseas Table 1: CDC’S Direct Investments in Fossil Fuel Infrastructure
    Campaign briefing Decarbonising aid Why we must stop UK financing for fossil fuels overseas May 2020 Photo: decoalonize.org CC: BY-NC-SA 2.0 Environmental activists in Kenya are determined to show that coal has no place in the country’s energy future. Why aid for fossil fuels must end • These investments are only one part of UK public financing for fossil fuels overseas which undermine • The world has ten years to decarbonise the global the government’s national commitments on economy and limit global temperature rises to emissions reductions. Since the Paris Agreement O 1.5 C – the target set by the Paris Agreement in was signed, approximately £568 million of UK aid 2015. This is an absolutely crucial demand for has been invested in fossil fuel projects overseas. frontline communities whose lands and livelihoods If we include export credits provided by UK Export will be destroyed by climate breakdown. Finance (UKEF) for fossil fuels, that number rises to • The UK government argues that investing in oil and £3.9 billion. gas is a good medium-term alternative to coal • Despite claims to be supporting a transition to power for countries in the global south. However, cleaner energy, CDC has £213 million of active this argument has been thoroughly debunked as investments in projects using the most polluting it will create fossil fuel dependency and lock in fuels, including diesel and heavy fuel oil.2 In 1 high carbon emissions for generations to come. countries including Ghana, CDC’s projects are also • UK aid is legally required to be spent on poverty contributing to the privatisation of energy systems, reduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Today, Their Tomorrow
    Our Their Today, Tomorrow Our Today, Their Tomorrow | How British leadership can build a better world for children How British leadership can build a better world for children Our Today, Their Tomorrow How British leadership can build a better world for children Our today, their tomorrow. How British leadership can build a better world for children Contents Acknowledgements 4 Contributor Biographies 5 Introduction 10 Part 1: Our global leadership, values and traditions 13 1. Rt Hon Andrew Mitchell MP: A Development Agenda for 14 the 21st Century 2. Dr Karin von Hippel: The UK’s role in disrupting ISIL 21 3. Dr Sanjay Pradhan and Joe Powell: British leadership on 28 open government 4. Dr John Bew: Maintaining our traditions as an activist 35 humanitarian nation 5. Professor Tom Fletcher: Post-Brexit Britain as an 42 international powerhouse for liberty, creativity and humanity 6. Christian Guy: Building public confidence in Britain’s 50 moral mission Part 2: Protecting the most vulnerable children 56 1. Sir John Holmes: Britain’s future humanitarian policy 57 2 Contents 2. Flick Drummond MP: Protecting children affected 64 by conflict 3. Jamie Cooper: Leading the way on eradicating 70 child malnutrition 4. Baroness Jenkin: A development agenda with girls at its heart 77 5. Nick Grono: Modern-day abolitionists: Putting Britain at the 84 forefront of fighting slavery Part 3: The role of innovation 91 1. Sir Andrew Witty: Using innovation, technology and 92 research to deliver a world free from poverty 2. Paul Polman: The business case for sustainable development 99 3. Joe Cerrell: Driving innovation in global health 105 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 a Personal View
    Amnesty International Cambridge City Group May 2016 - April 2017 Cambridge Cambridge is an extraordinary city. It is immensely rich - intellectually, historically, culturally, financially. The University of Cambridge has nurtured more Nobel Prize winners than any other institution. Its thriving high tech industries produce the most patent applications in the country. It comes only second in the tables for pupils achieving good GCSE results in maths and English. It has a high population of young people, very few of whom claim benefits. The average weekly income is near the top nationally, as are house prices. As are house prices. Cambridge is the most unequal city in the country. Listed third for house unaffordability, a rise of 122% in homelessness over 2015, five food banks in the city centre, lowest per capita welfare spending, with 30% of children living in poverty in three of the city wards : the difference between those who have and those who have not is stark. This is the environment in which the Amnesty International Cambridge City Group works, a vibrant exciting place to be with problems common to the rest of the country. Cambridge was an early participant in the Amnesty movement. The group, the eighteenth still active in the country, was established in February 1969, a year of great social upheaval in Europe. The relationship between those in power and those who felt unrepresented was put to the test, sometimes violently. In 2016 that relationship was tested on the world stage. The Amnesty International Report 2016-17 says : ‘For millions, 2016 was a year of unrelenting misery and fear, as governments and armed groups abused human rights in a multitude of ways.’ With growing suppression comes growing resistance, an awareness that inaction is not an option.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Disruption?
    CONTENTS Contents EDITORIAL Faster, cleaner, smarter Editor’s letter Nick Molho 10 Sam Robinson 4 Code of ethics? Director’s note Christina Blacklaws 12 Ryan Shorthouse 5 A digital NHS: is it all good news? Letters to the editor 6 Rachel Hutchings 13 Assistive policy for assistive technology Clive Gilbert 14 DIGITAL SOCIETY Mind the digital skills gap Updating Whitehall Helen Milner 15 Daniel Korski CBE 7 Skype session with… Levelling up the tech sector Nir Eyal Matt Warman MP 9 Phoebe Arslanagić-Wakefield 17 Page 25 Damian Collins MP calls for a fundamental overhaul of the way we regulate social media Bright Blue is an independent think tank and pressure group for liberal conservatism. Director: Ryan Shorthouse Chair: Matthew d’Ancona Board of Directors: Rachel Johnson, Alexandra Jezeph, Diane Banks, Phil Clarke & Richard Mabey Editors: Sam Robinson & Phoebe Arslanagić-Wakefield brightblue.org.uk Page 18 The Centre Write interview: Print: Aquatint | aquatint.co.uk Rory Stewart Design: Chris Solomons Jan Baker CONTENTS 3 THE CENTRE WRITE INTERVIEW: DIGITAL WORLD ARTS & BOOKS Rory Stewart OBE 18 Digital borders? The AI Economy: Work, Wealth and Welfare Will Somerville 28 in the Robot Age (Roger Bootle) DIGITAL DEMOCRACY Defying the gravity effect? Diane Banks 35 Detoxifying public life David Henig 30 Inadequate Equilibria (Eliezer Yudkowsky) Catherine Anderson 22 Blockchain to the rescue? Sam Dumitriu 36 Our thoughts are not our own Dr Jane Thomason 31 Bagehot: The Life and Times of the Jim Morrison 23 Greatest Victorian (James Grant) Rethinking
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill
    PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT GENERAL COMMITTEES Public Bill Committee ADVANCED RESEARCH AND INVENTION AGENCY BILL Sixth Sitting Thursday 22 April 2021 (Afternoon) CONTENTS SCHEDULE 3 agreed to. CLAUSES 10 TO 15 agreed to. New clauses considered. Bill to be reported, without amendment. PBC (Bill 264) 2019 - 2021 No proofs can be supplied. Corrections that Members suggest for the final version of the report should be clearly marked in a copy of the report—not telephoned—and must be received in the Editor’s Room, House of Commons, not later than Monday 26 April 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 183 Public Bill Committee22 APRIL 2021 Advanced Research and Invention 184 Agency Bill The Committee consisted of the following Members: Chairs: JUDITH CUMMINS, †MR PHILIP HOLLOBONE,ESTHER MCVEY,DEREK TWIGG † Baker, Duncan (North Norfolk) (Con) † Onwurah, Chi (Newcastle upon Tyne Central) (Lab) † Bell, Aaron (Newcastle-under-Lyme) (Con) Owen, Sarah (Luton North) (Lab) † Blackman, Kirsty (Aberdeen North) (SNP) † Richardson, Angela (Guildford) (Con) Butler, Dawn (Brent Central) (Lab) † Solloway, Amanda (Parliamentary Under-Secretary † Crosbie, Virginia (Ynys Môn) (Con) of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy) † Fletcher, Mark (Bolsover) (Con) † Tomlinson, Michael (Lord Commissioner of Her † Flynn, Stephen (Aberdeen South) (SNP) Majesty’s Treasury) † Furniss, Gill (Sheffield, Brightside and Hillsborough) † Zeichner, Daniel (Cambridge) (Lab) (Lab) Hunt, Jane (Loughborough) (Con) Sarah Ioannou, Seb Newman, Committee Clerks † Mayhew, Jerome (Broadland) (Con) † Metcalfe, Stephen (South Basildon and East Thurrock) (Con) † attended the Committee 185 Public Bill CommitteeHOUSE OF COMMONS Advanced Research and Invention 186 Agency Bill information requests in 2020 and has answered 100 in Public Bill Committee the first three months of 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sub-State Politics of the Welsh [British?] Conservative Party 1997-2007
    MSc(Econ) in the Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MSc(Econ) Welsh Politics and Society (RT) ‘Change’ or ‘Continuity?’ The Sub-State Politics of the Welsh [British?] Conservative Party 1997-2007 Tomos Dafydd Davies September, 2008 DECLARATIONS The word length of this dissertation is 14992 words, including footnotes Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... I hereby declare that this thesis has not already been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being currently submitted in candidature for any other degree. It is the result of my own independent investigation and all authorities and sources, which have been consulted, are acknowledged in the bibliography. Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... STATEMENT 1 This work is the result of my own investigations, except when otherwise stated. When correction services have been used the extent and nature of the correction is clearly marked in footnote(s). Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... STATEMENT 2 I hereby give consent for my work, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside organisations. Signed……………………………………… Date………………………………………... - 2 - ‘Change’ or ‘Continuity?’ The Sub-State Politics of the Welsh [British?] Conservative Party ABSTRACT ___________________________________ A notable characteristic of the academic literature has hitherto been a largely unquestioning acceptance that political parties should be studied with reference to their role within the nation-state. The response of state-wide political parties to the establishment of sub-state government remains a relatively neglected research area. This thesis seeks to remedy this situation by analyzing the Conservative Party’s adaptation to devolution in Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • FCO Annual Report & Accounts 2016
    Annual Report & Accounts: 2016 - 2017 Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2016–17 (For the year ended 31 March 2017) Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Annual Report presented to the House of Commons by Command of Her Majesty Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 6 July 2017 HC 15 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Finance Directorate, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH Print ISBN 9781474142991 Web ISBN 9781474143004 ID P002873310 07/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Designed in-house by the FCO Communication Directorate Foreign & Commonwealth Office Annual Report and Accounts 2016 - 2017 - Contents Contents Foreword by the Foreign Secretary ......................................................................................... 1 Executive
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2019: Mps in Wales
    Etholiad Cyffredinol 2019: Aelodau Seneddol yng Nghymru General Election 2019: MPs in Wales 1 Plaid Cymru (4) 5 6 Hywel Williams 2 Arfon 7 Liz Saville Roberts 2 10 Dwyfor Meirionnydd 3 4 Ben Lake 8 12 Ceredigion Jonathan Edwards 14 Dwyrain Caerfyrddin a Dinefwr / Carmarthen East and Dinefwr 9 10 Ceidwadwyr / Conservatives (14) Virginia Crosbie Fay Jones 1 Ynys Môn 13 Brycheiniog a Sir Faesyfed / Brecon and Radnorshire Robin Millar 3 Aberconwy Stephen Crabb 15 11 Preseli Sir Benfro / Preseli Pembrokeshire David Jones 4 Gorllewin Clwyd / Clwyd West Simon Hart 16 Gorllewin Caerfyrddin a De Sir Benfro / James Davies Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire 5 Dyffryn Clwyd / Vale of Clwyd David Davies Rob Roberts 25 6 Mynwy / Monmouth Delyn Jamie Wallis Sarah Atherton 33 8 Pen-y-bont ar Ogwr / Bridgend Wrecsam / Wrexham Alun Cairns 34 Simon Baynes Bro Morgannwg / Vale of Glamorgan 9 12 De Clwyd / Clwyd South 13 Craig Williams 11 Sir Drefaldwyn / Montgomeryshire 14 15 16 25 24 17 23 21 22 26 18 20 30 27 19 32 28 31 29 39 40 36 33 Llafur / Labour (22) 35 37 Mark Tami 38 7 34 Alyn & Deeside / Alun a Glannau Dyfrdwy Nia Griffith Gerald Jones 17 23 Llanelli Merthyr Tudful a Rhymni / Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney Tonia Antoniazzi Nick Smith Chris Bryant 18 24 30 Gwyr / Gower Blaenau Gwent Rhondda Geraint Davies Nick Thomas-Symonds Chris Elmore Jo Stevens 19 26 31 37 Gorllewin Abertawe / Swansea West Tor-faen / Torfaen Ogwr / Ogmore Canol Caerdydd / Cardiff Central Carolyn Harris Chris Evans Stephen Kinnock Stephen Doughty 20 27 32 38 Dwyrain Abertawe /
    [Show full text]
  • View Future Day Orals PDF File 0.11 MB
    Published: Friday 4 December 2020 Questions for oral answer on a future day (Future Day Orals) Questions for oral answer on a future day as of Friday 4 December 2020. The order of these questions may be varied in the published call lists. [R] Indicates that a relevant interest has been declared. Questions for Answer on Monday 7 December Oral Questions to the Secretary of State for Defence Allan Dorans (Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock): What plans he has for future military and security co-operation with EU (a) institutions and (b) member states. (909779) Jessica Morden (Newport East): What steps he is taking to increase the take-up of UK-produced steel in defence procurement. (909780) Sir David Amess (Southend West): What steps he is taking to ensure that his Department’s spending supports (a) high-skilled jobs and (b) the wider UK economy. (909781) Fleur Anderson (Putney): What support his Department has provided to veterans during the covid-19 outbreak. (909782) Holly Mumby-Croft (Scunthorpe): What recent preparations his Department has made to support (a) the NHS and (b) other public bodies in their response to the covid-19 outbreak. (909783) David Simmonds (Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner): What recent preparations his Department has made to support (a) the NHS and (b) other public bodies in their response to the covid-19 outbreak. (909784) Christine Jardine (Edinburgh West): What recent assessment he has made of the effectiveness of his Department's official development assistance spending. (909785) Andrew Jones (Harrogate and Knaresborough): What recent assessment he has made of the potential merits of including armed forces veterans in the UK’s response to the covid-19 outbreak.
    [Show full text]
  • (Amendment) Bill: Second Reading 3 3
    Issued on: 22 October at 5.26pm Call lists for the Chamber Friday 23 October 2020 A list of Members, both virtually and physically pres- ent, selected to ask Oral Questions and to speak in response to Urgent Questions and Ministerial State- ments; and a list of Members physically present to participate in substantive proceedings. Call lists are compiled and published incrementally as information becomes available. For the most up-to- date information see the parliament website: https:// commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/ CONTENTS 1. Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill: Second Reading 1 2. Mobile Homes Act 1983 (Amendment) Bill: Second Reading 3 3. Caravan Sites Bill: Second Reading 4 4. Local Authorities (Borrowing and Investment) Bill: Second Reading 5 2 Call lists for the Chamber Friday 23 October 2020 ANIMAL WELFARE (SENTENCING) BILL: SECOND READING Debate on the Second Reading of the Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Bill is expected to start at 9.35am and may not continue after 2.30pm. It is expected to conclude at about 1.45pm. Order Member Debate Party 1 Chris Loder (West Animal Welfare (Sentenc- Con Dorset) ing) Bill: Second Reading 2 Kerry McCarthy (Bristol Animal Welfare (Sentenc- Lab East) ing) Bill: Second Reading 3 Neil Parish (Tiverton and Animal Welfare (Sentenc- Con Honiton) ing) Bill: Second Reading 4 Sir Christopher Chope Animal Welfare (Sentenc- Con (Christchurch) ing) Bill: Second Reading 5 Mark Jenkinson (Work- Animal Welfare (Sentenc- Con ington) ing) Bill: Second Reading 6 Sir David Amess (Sou- Animal Welfare (Sentenc- Con thend
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]