DOCSLIB.ORG

CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project. Consultancy Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project. Consultancy Services Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: TA 8887-KGZ November 2016 KGZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project (Section “Epkin [Km 89] to Bashkugandy [formerly Dyikan] [Km 159]”) This Initial Environment Examination in Detailed Design Stage was prepared by Japan Overseas Consultants/ DI”KYRGYZDORTRANSPROEKT for the Ministry of Transport and Roads of Kyrgyz Republic for the Asian Development Bank, by updating the IEE Report in the Feasibility Stage prepared by Kocks Consult GmbH / Finnish Overseas Consultants Ltd. / CAC Consulting This IEE is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank ADT - Average Daily Traffic AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AP - Affected People BoQ - Bill of Quantities CAREC - Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation CEWP Construction Environmental Work Plan CITES - Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CO - Carbon Monoxide CSC - Construction Supervision Consultant CW - Civil Works dBA - A-weighted decibels DO - Dissolved oxygen EA - Executing Agency EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EIP - Environmental Impact Permit EMoP - Environmental Monitoring Plan EMP - Environmental Management Plan FCM - Family Medicine Centres GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism h, hr - Hour Ha - Hectare HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus IA - Implementing Agency IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IES - International Environmental Specialist IPIG - Investment Projects Implementation Group KDTP - Kyrgyzdortransproekt Kg - Kilogram Km - Kilometer Kpa - Kilopascal LAR - Land Acquisition and Resettlement LARP - Land Acquisition Resettlement Plan LHS - Left Hand Side Ls - Lump Sum M2 - Square Meter M3 - Cubic Meter Max. - Maximum MESD - Ministry of Economic and Sustainable Department Min. - Minimum MOF - Ministry of Finance MOTR - Ministry of Transport and Road of the Kyrgyz Republic MoCIT Ministry of Culture, Information and Tourism of the Kyrgyz Republic MPC - Maximum Permissible Concentrations NES - National Environmental Specialist NGO - Non-Governmental Organization No. - Number NO2 - Nitrogen Dioxide PAM - Project Administration Manual PAP - Project-Affected Person PBM - Performance-based maintenance PER - Public Environmental Review PPMS - Project Performance Management System PPTA - Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RAP - Resettlement Action Plan RHS - Right Hand Side ROW - Right-of-Way RP - Resettlement Plan SA - Social Assessment SAEPF - State Agency on Environment Protection and Forestry SER - State Environmental Review SO2 - Sulfur Dioxide SPS - Safeguard Policy Statement SSEMP - Site Specific Environmental Management Plan TA - Technical Assistance TS - Technical Survey TMP - Traffic Management Plan TOR - Terms of Reference TPH - Petroleum Hydrocarbon TSP - Total Suspended Particulates UNFCC - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change WHSP - Worker’s Health and Safety Plan Contents A. Executive Summary 8 B. Policy, Legal, and Administrative Framework 13 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................13 2. Extent of IEE Study ........................................................................................................14 3. Environmental protection legislation of Kyrgyz Republic ................................................. 15 4. Permitting Processes in the Kyrgyz Republic ................................................................. 17 5. Environmental Standards ...............................................................................................18 6. Required ADB Environmental Approval ..........................................................................19 C. Description of the Project 21 1. Need for the Project .....................................................................................................21 2. General information on project facility .......................................................................21 3. Type and Technical Road Category of the Project ..........................................................22 4. Details of the Project ......................................................................................................23 4.1. Road Cross Section ................................................................................................. 23 4.2. Bridges/Culverts/Water pipe ....................................................................................... 25 4.3 Powerlines ...................................................................................................................25 5. Temporary Ancillary Facilities .........................................................................................25 5.1. Material Sources and Cut and Fill ............................................................................25 5.2. Construction materials .............................................................................................26 5.3. Asphalt and Cement Batching Plants .......................................................................27 5.4. Construction Camp ..................................................................................................27 6. Alternatives ..................................................................................................................27 7. Traffic Volume ................................................................................................................28 8. Proposed Schedule for Implementation .....................................................................28 D. Description of the Environment 28 1. Topography, Geology, and Soils .................................................................................28 2. Climate..........................................................................................................................29 3. Hydrology, Water Resources, and Water Quality .......................................................29 4. Ecological Resources in Project Area .......................................................................... 29 4.1. Flora .......................................................................................................................30 4.2. Fauna......................................................................................................................30 5. Endogenous and Exogenous Processes ....................................................................30 6. Socioeconomic Information ........................................................................................31 7. Cultural and Archaeological Resources .....................................................................33 8. Sensitive Receptors .....................................................................................................34 9. Baseline Measurements ..............................................................................................35 9.1. Water Quality Measurements ................................................................................35 9.2. Air Quality Measurements ........................................................................................36 9.3. Noise and Vibration Measurements .........................................................................36 E. Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 38 1. Impacts in the Project Phases .....................................................................................38 2. Mitigation measures .......................................................................................................48 2.1 Pre-Construction and Design Phase ............................................................................48 2.2. Construction Phase ................................................................................................. 52 2.3. Operations and Maintenance Phase ........................................................................60 2.4. Climate Change Impacts on the Project Road ..........................................................63 F. Analysis of Alternatives 65 1. Zero Option ..................................................................................................................65 2. Alternative- the road reconstruction project ................................................................ 66 1. Public Consultations and Participation ......................................................................67 2. Information Disclosure ................................................................................................70 H. Grievance Redress Mechanism 71 1. Objectives ....................................................................................................................71 2. Grievance Redress Group (RG) ..................................................................................71 2.1. Functioning of the GRG within the Grievance Redress Mechanism ...................... 71 2.2. Composition of GRG ................................................................................................. 71 2.3 Duties of GRG
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Evaluation of the Building a Constituency for Peace Project
    2016 Final Evaluation of the Building a Constituency for Peace Project FINAL REPORT [НАЗВАНИЕ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ] | [Адрес организации] 0 Final Evaluation of the Building a Constituency for Peace Project Final Report December 2016 Prepared by: Natalia Kosheleva International Consultant E-mail: [email protected] Elmira Kerimalieva National Consultant E-mail: [email protected] 1 Content List of abbreviations ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 10 2 Object and context of evaluation ............................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Project Theory of Change and expected results ............................................................................... 10 2.2 Project implementation .................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Project reach ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project (Section “Epkin [Km 89] to Bashkugandy [Formerly Dyikan] [Km 159]”)
    Environmental Monitoring Report January – June 2020 September 2020 KGZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project (Section “Epkin [Km 89] to Bashkugandy [formerly Dyikan] [Km 159]”) Prepared by Gentek Consulting Muhendislik for the Ministry of Transport and Roads of the Kyrgyz Republic and the Asian Development Bank. This environmental monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 Preamble 6 1.2 General 6 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND CURRENT WORKS 8 2.1 Project Description 8 2.2 Project Contracts and Management 11 2.2.1 Scope of Work under the Contract 15 2.2.2 Main Organizations Involved in the Project 17 2.3 Design Work during the Current Reporting Period 19 2.3.1 Road Construction Works 19 2.3.2 Construction of Bridges and Culverts 22 2.3.3 Quarries 23 2.3.4 Production Site Territory 24 2.3.5 Camp 26 2.3.6 Tree Management 28 2.3.7 Personnel Data 28 2.4 Description of any Design Changes 28 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES 30 3.1 General Description of Environmental Protection Measures 30 3.1.1 Road Construction Works 30 3.1.2 Quarries 32 3.1.3 Production Site Territory 35 3.1.4 Tree Management 37 3.1.5 Objects of Historical and Cultural Heritage at the Site 37 3.1.6 Construction Waste 39 3.1.7 Storage Areas 42 3.2 Construction Site Monitoring 45 3.3 Observed Problems (Based on Non-Compliance Records) 46 3.3.1 Overview and Description of the Problems Observed during the Current Period 48 Observed Problems 48 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyz Republic DEV 200662
    Measuring results, sharing lessons sharing results, Measuring OPERATION EVALUATION Kyrgyz Republic - DEV 200662 Support for the National Productive Safety Nets and Long-Term Community Resilience A mid-term evaluation of WFP’s Operation (July 2014 – May 2016) Final Report August 2016 Evaluation Team: Sophia Dunn, Anara Alymkulova and Terrence Jantzi Evaluation Manager: Martin Fisher Commissioned by the WFP Office of Evaluation Report Number: OEV/2016/003 i Acknowledgements The evaluation team sincerely thanks the WFP Kyrgyzstan Country Office in Bishkek for the efficient facilitation of the evaluation process. The staff generously afforded their time to support the team with excellent planning and logistics and to provide relevant information. The passion of the team culture for this project was evident in their energy and enthusiasm to ensure a good evaluation process. Our gratitude also goes to all the stakeholders (Government authorities, the donor community, the United Nations agencies, the cooperating partners and other non- governmental organizations, the beneficiaries, and civil society), who dedicated their time to participate in informative discussions and contributed significantly to the findings of the evaluation. Sophia Dunn, Anara Alymkulova and Terrence Jantzi Disclaimer The opinions expressed are those of the Evaluation Team, and do not necessarily reflect those of the World Food Programme. Responsibility for the opinions expressed in this report rests solely with the authors. Publication of this document does not imply endorsement by WFP of the opinions expressed. The designation employed and the presentation of material in the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers.
    [Show full text]
  • (Indicativo De País +996) Comunicación Del 9.IX.2019
    Kirguistán (indicativo de país +996) Comunicación del 9.IX.2019: La State Communications Agency under the State Committee of Information Technologies and Communications of Kyrgyz Republic, Bishkek, anuncia actualizaciones al plan nacional de numeración de Kirguistán. Descripción de la introducción de nuevos recursos en el plan nacional de numeración E.164 para el indicativo de país 996: NDC Longitud del número N(S)N (indicativo nacional de Utilización Hora y fecha destino) o cifras iniciales Longitud Longitud del número UIT-T E.164 de introducción del N(S)N (número máxima mínima nacional (significativo)) 55 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 20 de abril de 2010 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 55 X XXX XXX) 75 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 1 de diciembre de 2017 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 75 5 XXX XXX) 99 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 2 de mayo de 2019 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 99 0 XXX XXX) 99 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 4 de junio de 2019 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 99 5 XXX XXX) 99 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 4 de junio de 2019 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 99 7 XXX XXX) 99 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 4 de junio de 2019 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 99 8 XXX XXX) 99 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 10 de abril de 2019 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 99 9 XXX XXX) 88 9 9 Número no geográfico – Servicios 9 de agosto de 2019 de telefonía móvil (Alfa Telecom) (+996 88 0 1XX XXX) Contactos: State Communications Agency
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project: Epkin (Km 89) to Bashkugandy (Km 159) Initi
    Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 48401-007 June 2018 KGZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project (Section “Epkin [Km 89] to Bashkugandy [formerly Dyikan] [Km 159]”) This Initial Environment Examination in Detailed Design Stage was prepared by Japan Overseas Consultants/ DI”KYRGYZDORTRANSPROEKT for the Ministry of Transport and Roads of Kyrgyz Republic for the Asian Development Bank, by updating the IEE Report in the Feasibility Stage prepared by Kocks Consult GmbH / Finnish Overseas Consultants Ltd. / CAC Consulting This IEE is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATIONS A-2B Achaeological Survey and Assessment Report and Proposed Planfor Section 2B ADB - Asian Development Bank ADT - Average Daily Traffic AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome AP - Affected People BoQ - Bill of Quantities CAREC - Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation CEWP Construction Environmental Work Plan CITES - Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CO - Carbon Monoxide CSC - Construction Supervision Consultant CW - Civil Works dBA - A-weighted decibels DO - Dissolved oxygen EA
    [Show full text]
  • National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic
    National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic Population and Housing Census of the Kyrgyz Republic of 2009 Book I Main social and demographic characteristics of population and number of housing units Bishkek 2009 Main social and demographic characteristics of population and number of housing units Editorial board: Chairman - O. Abdykalykov Members: - D. Baijumanov - A. Osmonaliev - N. Tulegabylov - A. Kim - K. Koichumanova - R. Plesovskih - Ch. Turdubaeva For further information about this publication, please contact: National Statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic Population and Housing Census Department 374, Frunze Street 720033, Bishkek city Tel: 996 (312) 324641; Fax: 996 (312)325604; 660138 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.stat.kg In the present publication we provide data on main social and demographic characteristics of population and number of housing units according to results of Population and Housing Census of the Kyrgyz Republic of 2009. The publication contains data on number of population, its location by territory, sex, age, nationality, language, marital status, income, data on population migration and housing conditions of households as well as. Data published in this book are preliminary and can be specified further. Detailed results of population and housing census – geographic, demographic, economical and social data on population, external and internal population migration, data on family, household and housing - will be produced in follow-up publications as separate books. While using statistical data in mass media and scientific papers, disseminating data through information nets (via e-net), hard copies, CD discs users have to refer to their sources (article 17, the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic “About State Statistics”).
    [Show full text]
  • Final Evaluation of the Socio-Economic Development of Communities Around Radioactive Sites in Kyrgyzstan Project
    FINAL EVALUATION OF THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITIES AROUND RADIOACTIVE SITES IN KYRGYZSTAN PROJECT Project ID: 00092094 Country: The Kyrgyz Republic Starting Date: 1 January 2015 Completion Date (planned): 31 December 2016 Completion Date (estimated): 30 June 2017 Evaluation period: April-May 2017 Executing Agency: UNDP JUNE 2017 1 Submitted to: UNDP in the Kyrgyz Republic Prepared by: Alisher Nazirov, Evaluation Expert Disclaimer. This is an external evaluation. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of UNDP. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 4 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 6 1. INTRODUCTION: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT.......................................... 8 1.1 Description of the Project ............................................................................................................................ 8 2. PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION ................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Key Questions and Scope of the Evaluation .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Endline Nutrition Survey in the Kyrgyz Republic
    Endline Nutrition Survey in the Kyrgyz Republic Analytical Report May 2018 ABOUT SPRING The Strengthening Partnerships, Results, and Innovations in Nutrition Globally (SPRING) project is a seven- year USAID-funded Cooperative Agreement to strengthen global and country efforts to scale up high- impact nutrition practices and policies and improve maternal and child nutrition outcomes. The project is managed by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., with partners Helen Keller International, The Manoff Group, Save the Children, and the International Food Policy Research Institute. DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the terms of the Cooperative Agreement AID-OAA- A-11-00031 (SPRING), managed by JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. (JSI). The contents are the responsibility of JSI and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was a collaborative effort between SPRING and partners in the Kyrgyz Republic. Many individuals and organizations played a vital role in its preparation. SPRING would like to thank the research and consulting agency M-Vector, which carried out the fieldwork for the endline survey, cleaned and analyzed the data, and prepared an initial draft report. SPRING/Kyrgyz Republic staff was instrumental in linking with M-Vector and government officials to obtain approvals and keep survey activities on schedule. Many people reviewed the initial draft of this report and made helpful suggestions for improvements. Finally, SPRING is grateful to the Ministry of Health in the Kyrgyz Republic, which welcomed and authorized SPRING to carry out the survey, and to the people of Jalalabad, Naryn and Uzgen for their willingness to participate in interviews and answer questions about their families, homes and nutrition practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Implementation and Effectiveness of the National Drug
    Policy Research Paper №77 Evaluation of implementation and effectiveness of the State Drug Policy of the Kyrgyz Republic for 2007-2010 Aida Abdraimova (HPAC) Julia Aleshkina (HPAC) Larisa Tsigelskaya (DS&MTD) Aisha Sulaimanova (DS&MTD) Bishkek 2012 1 Content 1. Background..……………………………………………………………………………………5 2. Goal and objectives of the evaluation.……………………………………………………….6 3. Evaluation materials and methodology………………………………………………………7 4. Evaluation results 4.1. Review of SDP (2007-2010): logical structure, introduction mechanisms, responsible persons, M&E…………………………………………………………………………9 4.2. Review of the current situation with drug supply for population of the country..…………………………………………………………………………….13 4.3. Affordability of drugs..…………………………………………………………..….20 4.4. Drug safety and quality. ………… ……………………………………………….30 4.5. Rational use of drugs.…………………...…………………………………………33 5. Conclusions..………………………………………………………………………………….45 6. Recommendations………………………………………………………………………….…46 7. Attachment 1 Logical structure of SDP……..……………………………………………..47 8. Attachment 2…………………………………………………………………………………..48 2 Acknowledgement Health Policy Analysis Center extends its deep gratitude to all managers of Family Medicine Centers and pharmacies in Bishkek, Chui, Issyk-Kul and Osh oblasts which have been involved into the study for their assistance and contribution to information collection. We would like to express out special gratitude to KFW for their financial support to conduction of the study. 3 Abbreviations BA Bronchial asthma WHO World Health Organization SDP State
    [Show full text]
  • Social Monitoring Report
    Social Monitoring Report January-June 2020 October 2020 KGZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Section 2B, Epkin – Dyikan [Bashkuugandy] Road [km 89+500 – km 159+200] Prepared by Prepared by Ministry of Transport and Road KR in consortium with Gentek Consult Ltd for the Asian Development Bank. This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Semi-annual Social Monitoring Report No.3 July 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Project Background 3 2 Social Safeguards Monitoring 4 2.1 Scope and Objectives of the Monitoring 4 2.2 Internal Monitoring 5 3 LARP Implementation Status 6 3.1 Project Sections Summaries 6 3.2 Status of civil works 7 3.3 Summary of LARP 8 3.4 LARP implementation Preparatory activities 8 3.5 LAR Impact According to the Approved LARP and Implementation of the LARP 10 3.6 Social due diligence for the road axis shifting areas 11 3.7 LARP implementation 11 4 Social Due Diligence Activities for Relocation of Public Utilities 12 4.1 Social due diligence approach 12 4.2 Next steps 13 5 Grievance Redress Mechanism 13 6 Public Consultation and Participation 15 7 Other Social Monitoring
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Assistance Layout with Instructions
    Initial Environmental Examination July 2017 KGZ: Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project —Additional Financing (Section “Kochkor [Km 64] to Epkin [Km 89]”) Prepared by Japan Overseas Consultants/DI KYRGYZDORTANSPROEKT for the Ministry of Transport and Roads and for the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: TA 8887-KGZ July 2017 KGZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project (Section “Kochkor [Km 64] to Epkin [Km 89]”) This Initial Environment Examination in Detailed Design Stage was prepared by Japan Overseas Consultants/ DI”KYRGYZDORTRANSPROEKT for the Ministry of Transport and Roads of Kyrgyz Republic and for the Asian Development Bank, by updating the IEE Report in the Feasibility Stage prepared by Kocks Consult GmbH / Finnish Overseas Consultants Ltd. / CAC Consulting This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.
    [Show full text]
  • CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project, Phase 2 (Section 2A)
    Initial Environmental Examination June 2018 KGZ: Proposed Loan and Grant for Additional Financing on CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project, Phase 2 (Section 2A) Prepared by the Ministry of Transport and Roads of the Kyrgyz Republic for the Asian Development Bank. This is an updated version of the draft originally posted in July 2017 available on https://www.adb.org/projects/documents/kgz-48401-008-iee-0. Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: TA 8887-KGZ May 2018 KGZ: CAREC Corridors 1 and 3 Connector Road Project (Section “Kochkor [Km 64] to Epkin [Km 89]”) This Initial Environment Examination in Detailed Design Stage was prepared by Japan Overseas Consultants/ DI”KYRGYZDORTRANSPROEKT for the Ministry of Transport and Roads of Kyrgyz Republic and for the Asian Development Bank, by updating the IEE Report in the Feasibility Stage prepared by Kocks Consult GmbH / Finnish Overseas Consultants Ltd. / CAC Consulting This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. ABBREVIATIONS A-2A - Achaeological Assessment Report for Section 2A in 2018 ADB - Asian Development
    [Show full text]