Field Evaluation of the System for the Effective Control of Urban Environment Security (SECURES): Final Report on the Dallas Field Trial

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Evaluation of the System for the Effective Control of Urban Environment Security (SECURES): Final Report on the Dallas Field Trial The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Field Evaluation of the System for the Effective Control of Urban Environment Security (SECURES): Final Report on the Dallas Field Trial Author(s): Lorraine G. Mazerolle Ph.D.; James Frank Ph.D.; Dennis Rogan Ph.D.; Cory Watkins; Colleen Kadleck M.S. Document No.: 180113 Date Received: January 7, 2000 Award Number: 96-MU-MU-0018 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. A FIELD EVALUATION OF TEE SYSTEM FOR THE EFFECTIVE GONTROL OF -URBAN ENVIRONMENT SECURITY S SECURES^"): FINAL REPORT ON THE DALLAS FIELD TRIAL Submitted to the National Institute of Justice Award Number 6-897 1-OH-IJ Lorraine Green Mazerolle, Ph.D. University of Cincinnati James Frank, Ph.D. University of Cincinnati Dennis Rogan, Ph.D. President Statistical Analysis for Law Enforcement Strategies Cory Watkins, Ph.D. University of Central Florida and Colleen Kadleck, M. S. Center for Criminal Justice Research University of Cincinnati October, 1999 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. A FELD EVALUATION OF THE SYSTEM FOR THE &Fl?ECTIvECONTROL OF -6A.N ~NWRONMENT SECURITY (“SECURESm”): FINAL REPORT ON THE DALLAS FIELD TRIAL EXECUTIVESUMMARY SECURESm (@stem for the Effective control of urban &ironment Security) is described as a technologically advanced acoustic sensing system capable of idenwg, discriminating, and reporting gunshots within one second of a shot being fired. The technology was developed by Alliant Techsystems, Inc. through knding by the Department of Defense. AUiant Techsystems, Inc. envisioned the SECUREP technology as a rapid response tool: they suggested the technology could increase police response time by 85 percent, increase the apprehension rate of shots fired offenders by 40 percent, and increase the survivability rate of gunshot victims by 50 percent. Approximately 80 pole Units are required to cover a one square mile area at a cost of approximately $5,500 per month to lease a system covering one square mile. Pole units cost $1,750 each and the batteries last approximately 2 months. SECURESTUwill cost a police department at least $72,480 per 10,000 people to install and use in any one calendar year. a Oak Cliff TX, a neighborhood of approximately one square mile, was selected as the experimental test site due to its high incidence of random gunfire. The field test comprised installation of 86 pole units on utility poles. 75 pole units were erected at intersections, 9 were in alleys, and 2 were on streets in the target area. a The SECURESm technology “downtime” during the field trial in Dallas, TX was 10,349 minutes of the total running time of 76,740 minutes (1 1.9 percent of the time). 26 pole unit batteries had to be replaced over the course of the SECURESTU trial phase. Citizen calls for random gunfire (signal 6Gs) were considered priority 4 level calls in the Dallas Police Department. Dispatchers had a one hour window to dispatch random gunfire ‘ calls for service. A new signal code was incorporated into the Dallas CAD system that represented a SECURESTMidentified call for random gunfire (signal 6s). This signal code was designed to assist the Evaluation Team in understanding how officers respond to citizen calls for service versus SECURESm identified calls for service. 1 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. 0 There were 215 alleged gun shots identified by the SECURESm technology during the trial phase (October 25, 1996 to December 16,1996). Of the 215 SECURESm alerts, 23 (10.7 percent) could bt matched against a citizen call about a shot fired. This means that either citizens Simply do not call the police very frequently about shots being fired and the Dallas Police Department has a large under-reporting rate of shots being fired or the gunshot location system has a very high rate of false positive recordings of shots being fired. 0 During our field trial in Dallas, the police responded to 151 SECURESm alerts and 39 citizen calls about random gunfire. These 190 (15 1 + 39) police radio runs all took place in the one square mile community of Oakcliff during the two months of field testing. Our study finds that the extra 151 SECURESm dispatched radio runs over and above the citizen-initiated calls during the two-month field trial represents almost a five-fold increase I (190/39=4.87) in the number of police dispatches to random gunfire problems. 0 Examination of the Dallas Police Department call data indicated that dispatchers took longer on average to dispatch a SECURESTMidentified call (17.88 minutes) than a citizen identified call (13.25 minutes). Officers also took longer to arrive on the scene of a SECURESm identified call (24.41 minutes) than a citizen identified call (17.78 minutes) about random gunfire. 0 We compared response time for random gunfire calls before and during the SECURESfM field trial. Our analysis reveals that random gunfire calls for service (citizen initiated only) were not only dispatched quicker during the pre experimental phase but officers arrived quicker, they spent less time on the call and processed the call more quickly. 0 Examination of average response times for random gunfire calls for service prior to SECURESTMtesting (citizen initiated only) versus average response times during field testing (citizen and SECURESm initiated combined) indicated that, while the random gunfire call load increased dramatically, the average amount of time devoted to any one call (citizen or SECURESm) was relatively stable when the pre-experimental phase was compared to the experimental phase. 0 Findings from the call data analysis were inconsistent with officer perceptions of speed of response and time spent on 6G versus 6s calls for service. Officers indicated that they believed their responses to 6G and 6s calls were similar. Officers believed they spent the same or less time on a 6s call than a 6G call. The call data indicated that officers spend more time handling a SECURESm alert than a citizen identified call for random gunfire. 0 Oficers indicated that they did not believe that the SECURESTMtechnology would increase apprehension rates or survival rates. A substantial number of officers (79.4 percent) stated that they thought the SECURESTMsystem would help police focus on random gunfire “hot spots.” .. 11 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ...................................... ................ 1 .. II.GUNSANDCRIMEPR0BLEMS .......................................... 3 The Gun Problem in the United States ................................... 3 Gunsandcrime ..................................................... 3 Random Gunfire Problems ............................................. 5 . III. POLICE STRATEGIES TO REDUCE GUN PROBLEMS ..................... 7 N .THE SECURES^ GUNSHOT LOCATION SYSTEM ........................ 11 P V .DALLAS AS A RESEARCH SITE ......................................... 14 Experimental Site Selection ........................................... 14 Implementation of SECURESTMin the Experimental Test Site ............... 16 Roles of the Dallas Police Department and AUiant Techsystems. Inc. .......... 19 VI . THE DALLAS POLICE DEPARTMENT COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH SYSTEM ..................................................... 22 VII . SECURESTMSYSTEM PERFORMANCE ................................. 30 VIII . RESPONSE TIME ANALYSIS ......................................... 44 Gunshot Location Systems as a Rapid Response Tool ....................... 44 Response Time Analysis .............................................. 48 IX . RELATIONSHIP OF RANDOM GUNFIRE CALLS TO ARREST AND OFFENSE DATA ................................................................... 59 X . IMPACT OF SECURESTM ON THE POLICE ORGANIZATION ................61 WorkloadAnalysis ................................................... 61 Cost Analysis ....................................................... 63 XI . POLICE OFFICER PERCEPTIONS OF THE RANDOM GUNFIRE PROBLEM AND SECURES^ EFFECTIVENESS .............................. 67 Patrol Log Analysis .................................................. 67 Police Ofiicer Survey Results .......................................... 70 Summing Up Police Perceptions ........................................ 86 XII . CONCLUDING COMMENTS .......................................... 88 REFERENCES ..........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Union Station to Oak Cliff Dallas Streetcar Dallas, Texas
    Union Station to Oak Cliff Dallas Streetcar Dallas, Texas Environmental Assessment July 2011 In conjunction with Union Station to Oak Cliff Dallas Streetcar INTRODUCTION FOR WHAT PURPOSE HAS THIS DOCUMENT BEEN PREPARED? Many federally-funded projects, such as the one proposed within, must be reviewed under a number of environmental statutes, regulations, and executive orders. This environmental assessment (EA), prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500–1508) and the NEPA implementing procedures of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (23 CFR Part 771), briefly discusses (1) the need for the proposal, (2) alternatives to the proposal as required by §102(2)(E), (3) the environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives, and (4) list of agencies and persons consulted (40 CFR §1508.9). In December 2010, FTA awarded a $23 million Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant award to support a streetcar project within the City of Dallas, Texas. TIGER is a component of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. This project is consistent with the North Central Texas Council of Government’s (NCTCOG) Mobility 2030: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Dallas-Fort Worth Area, 2009 Amendment and Mobility 2035: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for North Central Texas. WHO IS THE PROJECT SPONSOR? The FTA is lead agency for the proposed action – the Union Station to Oak Cliff Streetcar TIGER Project. As the grant recipient, the NCTCOG is the project sponsor and current owner. Upon completion of the proposed action, ownership would be transferred to the City of Dallas.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Landmark Commission Landmark Nomination Form
    Dallas Landmark Commission Landmark Nomination Form I1.Name historic: Lake Cliff Historic District and/or common: date: 12. Location address: location/neighborhood: Lake Cliff Park. Fifth Street. Sixth Street. Blaviock Drive and Marsalis Avenue block: lot: land survey: tract size: 13. Current Zoning 14. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use ~_district ....X_park X both in progress Public Acquisition Accessibility progress restricted considered unrestricted specify IS. Ownership Current Owner: Various Contact: Phone: Address: City: State: Zip: 16. Form Preparation Date: 10/23/96 Name & Title: Jim Anderson. Senior Historic Preservation Planner Organization: City of Dallas Department of Planning and Development Contact: Jim Anderson Phone:(214) 670-4131 17. Representation on Existing Surveys Alexander Survey (citywide)_ local_ state national ~ National Register H.P.L. Survey (CBD) TX Historic Ldmk Oak Cliff K Archaeological Ldnik Victorian Survey — Dallas Historic Resources Survey, Phase .JIL ~ high medium — low• For Office Use Only Date Rec’d: Survey Verified: Y N by:_____ Field Check by:______ Petitions Needed: Y N Nomination: Archaeological Site Structure(s) Structure & Site District 46 18. Historic Ownership I original owner: Various significant later owner(s): 19. Construction Dates 1900 - Present I original: alterations/additions: 110. Architect I original construction: Various alterations/additions: Iii. Site Features I natural: Lake Cliff Park urban design: Lake Cliff Residential Neighborhood 112. Physical Description Condition, check one: Check one: — excellent — deteriorated — unaltered X original site _..X_ good — ruins — altered •.__moved(date — fair — unexposed Describe present and original (if known) physical appearance. Include style(s) ofarchitecture, current condition and relationship to surroundingfabric (structures, objects, etc).
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY in EXCELLENT LOCATION 0.954+/- Acres | Dallas Texas
    Downtown Dallas Grand Estates at Kessler Park 181, 753 VPD 338 Units Oaks at Trinity Trinity River 166 Units Lake Cliff Tower Oak Farms Dairy Methodist Dallas Lake Cliff Park Medical Center Novel Bishop Arts Apartments 302 Units WH Adamson High School Hector P. Garcia Middle School Victor Prosper Apartments 216 Units Felix Botello Elementary School Planned Deck JEFFERSON BLVD Park N BECKLEY AVE 0.954+/- ACRES S STOREY ST 17, 175 VPD Dallas Zoo 107,779 VPD N E 12TH ST DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY IN EXCELLENT LOCATION 0.954+/- Acres | Dallas Texas JORDAN CORTEZ JUSTIN TIDWELL MASON JOHN CHRIS LUSSIER Managing Principal Senior Director Director Director 214-556-1951 214-556-1955 214-556-1953 214-556-1954 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 0.954+/- ACRES DALLAS, TEXAS INVESTMENT OVERVIEW TAX INFORMATION Property 0.954+/- Acres Taxing Entity Tax Rate Location 213, 223 & 225 E 12th St, and 223 S Storey St Dallas, TX 75203 Dallas 0.7766 Access S Storey St & E 12th St Dallas ISD 1.310385 Utilities Available to the Site Dallas County 0.2531 Dallas Co Community College 0.124 Zoning MU-1: moderate density retail, office and/or multifamily residential Parkland Hospital 0.2695 Dallas County: 00000252796000000, 00000252799000000, Appraisal District Property ID 00000252808000000 2020 Total Tax Rate 2.733585 PRICE CHART Asking Price $1,050,000 Asking Price per Square Foot $25.27 *Seller will entertain a potential Joint Venture DEMOGRAPHICS ESTIMATED POPULATION (2018) ANNUAL
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Cliff Tower Lake Cliff Tower, Originally Named Cliff Towers, Is A
    Lake Cliff Tower Lake Cliff Tower, originally named Cliff Towers, is a twelve story landmark recently brought out of moth balls and converted into luxury condominiums. On Colorado Boulevard overlooking Lake Cliff Park, the building is an icon at the gateway to Oak Cliff. Opened in 1932 as a hotel and luxury apartments, it became senior housing in the 1950’s, a nursing home in the ‘60’s, and closed in 2000 when the owner could not afford repairs and code compliance. Evergreen Realty Partners, the developer, took advantage of $4.1 million in tax increment financing from the City of Dallas and began redevelopment in 2004. The results are a beautifully resurrected masterpiece with restored plastered lobby, theater room, billiards area, wine vault with private lockers, swimming pool, outdoor deck with fire pit, and 54 hip and swanky condominiums from 895 square feet to 2,000 square feet. Lake Cliff was created in 1888 a social club known as the club known as the Llewellyn Club. The Club excavated the lake on the south side of the street car line that ran along Colorado Boulevard from downtown Dallas. In 1906 Charles Mangold and John F. Zang bought the land around Lake Cliff, and built an amusement park. In 1909 Charles Mangold and his wife, Anna, purchased five acres of wooded land on a hill on the north side of Colorado and built their dream home. The hill had an incredible view to the northeast over the Trinity River to downtown Dallas. The Lake Cliff Amusement Park was too expensive to operate and the land and lake were sold to the city in 1913 for a public park.
    [Show full text]
  • Mallory Drug Store Landmark Nomination Form
    Dallas Landmark Commission Landmark Nomination Form ~ 1.Name historic: Mallory Drug store Date 5/5/98 and! or common: B and B Bicycles ~ 2. Location addresses: 900-902 W. Jefferson location! neighborhood: Jefferson Boulevard block: lot: land survey: tract size: 179/3238 part of lot 11 4000 sqft and 12 ~ 3. Current Zoning current zoning: Planned Development District No. 316 ~ 4. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use ~museum district X occupied building(s) X private unoccupied X...commercial residence both work in progress educational — religious scientific site Public Accessibility_x — entertainment government transportation Acquisition yes: restricted industrial other, specif~’ progress j’es: unrestricted militaiy considered no ~ 5. Ownership current owner: Beth Ferrell Phone (214) 943-3662 4b 6. Form Preparation 1 date: 5/5/98 name & title: , Jim Anderson, Preservation Planners, phone: (214) 670-4131 historical research:Designation Task Force ~ 7. Representation on Existing Surveys Alexander Survey (citywide) National Register H.P.L. Survey (CBD) ~A_B~C~D TX Hist Ldmk Oak Cliff Archaeological Ldmk Victorian Survey Dallas Historic Resources Survey, Phase_X_high low For Office Use Only Date Rec’d:_ Survey Verified: Y N by: Field Check by:_ Petitions Needed: Y N Nomination: Archaeological Site Structure(s) Structure & Site District ~ 8. Historic Ownership original owner: J.S. Mallory significant later owner(s): ~ 9. Construction Dates original: 1912-13 alterations/additions: ~ 10. Architect original construction: unknown alterations/additions: 4c 11. Site Features natural: no topography urban design: Early 20th century retail Street ~ 12. Physical Description Condition, check one: Check one: site — altered (date______ Describe present and original (~f known) physical appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Dallas Trail Plan
    Dallas Trail Network Plan City of Dallas Park and Recreation Department October 2008 Dallas Trail Network Plan City of Dallas Park and Recreation Table of Contents Summary 1 Trail Maps—Major Loop Trails Bachman Lake Park Trail 65 Active Trail Advocacy Groups and 6 Crawford Mem. Park Trail 66 Partners Inventory Fish Trap Lake Park Trail 67 Major Trails Map 7 Glendale Park Trail 68 Kiest Park Trail 69 Major Trails Inventory White Rock Lake Park Trail 70 Major Linear Trail Inventory 8 Trail Maps—Major Nature Trails Major Loop Trail Inventory 11 Major Nature Trail Inventory 12 Cedar Ridge Preserve Trails 72 Joppa Preserve Trails 73 Neighborhood Trails Map 13 L.B. Houston Park Trails 74 Neighborhood Trails Inventory 14 McCommas Bluff Trails 75 Texas Buckeye Trail 76 Trail Maps—Major Linear Trails Trinity Interpretive Center Trails 77 Bernal Trail 17 Valley View Park Trails 78 Cedar Crest Trail 18 Trail Photographic Documentation Appendix i Chalk Hill Trail 19 Coombs Creek Trail 20 Cottonbelt Trail 21 Cottonwood Trail 22 Dixon Branch Trail 24 Elm Fork Creek Trail 25 Elm Fork Trail 26 Five Mile Creek Trail 28 Great Trinity Forest Trail 30 Highland Hills Trail 31 Interurban Trail 32 John C. Phelps Trail 33 Katy Trail 34 Katy Spur Trail 37 Kiestwood Trail 38 Lake Highlands Trail 39 Matilda Trail 40 Northaven Trail 41 Prairie Creek Trail 43 Preston Ridge Trail 44 Runyon Creek Trail 45 Santa Fe Trail 46 Scyene Trail 48 Seagoville Trail 49 Southwest Dallas Trail 50 Timberglen Trail 51 Trinity Trail 52 Trinity Levee Trail 53 Trinity Strand Trail 56 Turtle Creek Trail 58 Union Pacific Trail 59 White Rock Creek Trail North 61 White Rock Creek Trail South 63 Dallas Trail Network Plan City of Dallas Park and Recreation 1 Introduction Methodology In 2002, the City of Dallas adopted the Park and During the Renaissance Plan process, planners Recreation Department’s Long Range utilized the broad Dallas County Trail Plan and Development Plan, A Renaissance Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Oak Cliff United Methodist Church Landmark Nomination Form
    Landmark Nomination Form [ Dallas Landmark Commission ri. Name historic: Oak Cliff United Methodist Church Date 7/17/97 and! or common: L2. Location addresses: 541-49 E. Jefferson location! neighborhood: Jefferson Boulevard block: lot: land survey: tract size: 107/3090 6partof7and8 55,880 sqfi ~ 3. Current Zoning current zoning: RR- Regional Retail ~ 4. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X occupied agricultural X private commercial in progress X religious Public Accessibility_x entertainment transportation Acquisition yes: restricted government — progress yes: unrestricted specify considered no ~ 5. Ownership current owner: North Texas Conference, United Methodist Church Contact: Katherine Spinks, Phone: (214) 943-4328 5k Address: 549 E. Jefferson Blvd. Dallas, Texas 75208 Form Preparation date: 6/18/97 name & title: , Jim Anderson, Preservation Planner, phone: (214) 670- 4131 7. Representation on Existing Surveys Alexander Survey (citywide) local state national National Register H.P.L. Survey (CBD) ~A~B_C~D Recorded TX Hist Ldmk Oak Cliff Archaeological Ldmk Victorian Survey — Dallas Historic Resources Survey, Phase medium low For Office Use Only Date Rec’d: Survey Verified: Y N by:_ Field Check by:_ Petitions Needed: Y N Nomination: Archaeological Site Structure(s) Structure & Site District ~ 8. Historic Ownership original owner: North Texas Conference, United Methodist Church significant later owner(s): ~ 9. Construction Dates original: Church-i 915, School-i 926, Youth Building-i 951 alterations/additions: 110. Architect original construction: Church- Sanguinet and Staats Architects, School-Eugene Davis alterations/additions: _____excellent _____deteriorated X unaltered _X _original site 11. Site Features natural: no topography urban design: Early 20th century retail Street ~ 12. Physical Description Condition, check one: Check one: _X _good ____ruins — itered ____moved fair ____unexposed — — (date______ Describe present and original ~‘~f known) physical appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity River Corridor Comprehensive Land Use Plan
    For information on the Trinity River Corridor Comprehensive Land Use Plan, please contact Trinity River Corridor Project Office 1500 Marilla, Room 6BS, Dallas TX 75218, (214) 671-9500 www.trinityrivercorridor.org Table of Contents Page Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................................................1 1. Introduction 3 2. A Vision to Transform Dallas’ Trinity Corridor 5 2050 Vision......................................................................................................................................................................5 Objectives for the Trinity Corridor..................................................................................................................................5 Framework Concepts for Public Investment....................................................................................................................6 Framework Concepts for Land Use and Development....................................................................................................7 3. Land Use and Urban Design Throughout the Trinity Corridor 13 Land Use Principles .......................................................................................................................................................14 Preferred Land Use Plan ................................................................................................................................................21 Urban Design Principles
    [Show full text]
  • 811 N. Marsalis OM
    811 N. MARSALIS AVE DALLAS, TEXAS OFFERING MEMORANDUM 811 N. MARSALIS AVE 811 N. LISTED BY DANNY MCQUAID DAVID HARRINGTON Associate - Multifamily EVP & National Director - Multifamily Direct +1 214 932 1284 Direct +1 310 295 1170 Mobile +1 903 237 8901 Mobile +1 310 497 5590 [email protected] [email protected] License No. 673000 (TX) License No. 01320460 (CA) OPPORTUNITY Matthews Real Estate is pleased to present 811 N Marsalis Ave, a 4-Unit value add multifamily asset located in Dallas, TX. Ideally located in between Downtown Dallas and Bishop Arts, 811 N Marsalis is situated in Lake Cliff, an area undergoing rapid growth and gentrification. New ownership has an outstanding opportunity to make improvements to a stabilized asset, and to raise the effective rental rates on all four units. PROPERTY INFO PROPERTY MAP PROPERTY ADDRESS 811 N Marsalis Ave, Dallas, TX 75203 PURCHASE PRICE $348,888.00 CAP RATE 6.15% Subject # OF UNITS Property 4 BUILDING SIZE 3,655 LOT SIZE 7,000 SF YEAR BUILT 1931 RENTAL UPSIDE 30% BISHOP ARTS DISTRICT The Bishop Arts District is located in the heart of North Oak Cliff, near the intersection of Bishop Street and Davis Street. The Bishop Arts District is home to over 60 independent boutiques, restaurants, bars, DEMOGRAPHICS coffee shops, and art galleries, making it one of Dallas’ most unique neighborhoods. The Bishop Arts District is a neighborhood rich in history and was the site of Dallas’ busiest trolly stop in the POPULATION 1-MILE 3-MILE 5-MILE 1930s. Since the area’s revitalization, the Bishop Arts District has been featured in the New York Times, USA Today and The Daily Beast for its small-town feel, hidden-gem appeal, and close-knit community.
    [Show full text]
  • Where Did Thomas L. Marsalis Go? By: Jim Barnes, Architect and Sharon Marsalis 1St March 2007
    Where Did Thomas L. Marsalis Go? By: Jim Barnes, architect and Sharon Marsalis 1st March 2007 Thomas L. Marsalis came to Dallas with the first railroad, in 1872. He was nineteen years old. He rapidly made a fortune in the wholesale grocery business. In 1873 Marsalis married Elizabeth Josephine (Lizzie) Crowdus, the daughter of Dr. J. W. Crowdus, one of Dallas’ wealthiest citizens and its future mayor. The couple’s three children, Allene, Laila, and Thomas, Jr., were all born in Dallas. Allene died in 1878 at age four and was buried in the Crowdus family plot at the Dallas “Pioneer Cemetery”. Thomas L. Marsalis was credited with helping to establish the Dallas fire department, initiating the pavement of streets, helping to capitalize a new newspaper, The Dallas Morning News , and acting as a Director for the Dallas State Fair in its Semi-Centennial celebration of 1886; but most of all, Marsalis is remembered today as “the Father of Oak Cliff”. His real estate development of Oak Cliff was a huge investment with its own steam railroad, water supply system, and public streets and parks. The Oak Cliff venture launched like an economic rocket but rather quickly fizzled back down to earth as a financial dud. After his demise with Oak Cliff, Thomas L. Marsalis disappears from the pages of Dallas histories. Amateur historians of the Dallas Historical Society’s internet “Message Board” have collaborated on a two and half year long research investigation into the fate of Thomas L. Marsalis. We herein offer corrections to some often repeated, but inaccurate, myths about his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnson Rooming House Other Name/Site Number: NA Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: NA
    NPS Form 10-900 ,, _____ .OMB No. 1024-0018, ·--·· United States Department of the Interior RECEIVED2280 °'' & National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form OCT 1 0 2014 1. Name of Property Historic Name: Johnson Rooming House Other name/site number: NA Name of related multiple property listing: NA I 2. Location Street & number: 1026 N. Beckley Avenue City or town: Dallas State: Texas County: Dallas Not for publication: □ Vicinity: □ I 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this @ nomination □ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property @ meets □ does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following levels of significance: @ national □ statewide □ local Applicable National Register Criteria: □ B □ C □ D State Historic Preservation Officer Date I Texas Historical Commission State or Federal agency / bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property □ meets □ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal a ency / bureau or Tribal Government I 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: ~ ered in the National Register _ determined eligible for the National Register _ determined not eligible for the National Register. _ removed from the National Register _ other, explain: __,_ _____ _ United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places REGISTRATION FORM NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Real Estate Transactions | Dallas Morning News
    Commercial real estate transactions | Dallas Morning News dallasnews SportsDay GuideLIVE FD Luxe neighborsgo aldiatx Subscribe Sign In My Account Premium Site OBITS CLASSIFIEDS AUTOS JOBS REAL ESTATE SHOPPING BUSINESS 89° FORECAST TRAFFIC WALL STREET AIRLINES TECHNOLOGY ECONOMY & YOU TOP 100 REAL ESTATE AUTOS Home > Business > Commercial Real Estate > Commercial Real Estate Headlines Commercial real estate transactions AA Published: 27 June 2014 11:03 AM Updated: 27 June 2014 11:03 AM Sales An investor purchased 2.2 acres just north of El Dorado Market Place on the southbound service road of the Dallas North Tollway in Frisco from American Bank of Texas. Henry S. Miller Brokerage’s John St. Clair brokered the sale with Citywide Alliance Realty. A local investor has purchased a 48,900-square-foot industrial building at 13375 Branch View Lane in Farmers Branch. Nathan Denton of Lee & Associates negotiated the sale with Larry Robbins of Capstone Commercial. Karma Ventures LLC bought the 15-unit Lake Cliff Place Apartments on East 5th Street in Dallas in Oak Cliff. Curtis Hawkins with David Griffin & Co. handled the transaction. The 96,000-square-foot former campus of St. Luke Community United Methodist Church at 6211 E. Grand Ave. has been purchased by Reconciliation Academy and will be used as CityScape East Grand Preparatory School. Henry S. Miller’s Lane Kommer brokered the sale. Northwind Construction Inc. has sold a 5,000-square-foot industrial building on almost an acre at 2215 Forum Drive in Arlington to Dylan-Hannah Investments LLC. Nick Talley of Bradford Commercial Real Estate Services brokered the sale with Jennifer Tran of Avignon Realty.
    [Show full text]