DOCSLIB.ORG

The Intersection of Governance and Agency in Farmers' Engagement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Intersection of Governance and Agency in Farmers' Engagement Who benefits?: The intersection of governance and agency in farmers’ engagement with the Oklahoma Farm to School Program by Gina K. Thornburg B.S., University of Kansas, 1985 B.A., University of Kansas, 1985 M.A., California State University, Northridge, 2005 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Geography College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Abstract Farm-to-school (FTS) programs are promoted as direct-marketing opportunities for farmers. As such, they are regarded by advocates and state and federal agencies as a pathway to rural economic development. The implementation of FTS food procurement poses significant challenges, however. Farmers make decisions regarding whether or not to market products to schools after learning about the program and considering an array of signals from multiscalar policies and governance structures. Research to date has left a gap in understanding farmers’ agency as it relates to governance structures and policy signals. This research on farmers’ engagement with the Oklahoma FTS Program contributes evidence to bridge this gap by examining the experiences not only of producers who participated in a FTS program but also of those who ceased participation or who chose not to participate. Employing a phronetic approach to social science, this explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods case study obtained quantitative and textual data from a mail survey, as well as data from two stints of qualitative fieldwork, in fall 2011 and fall 2012, which involved semistructured interviews and participant observation. Archival research completed the study methods used to gain a deeper understanding of farmers’ perspectives, practices, values, and experiences that informed their decisions to participate or not in a top-down-administered FTS program. Data collection was driven by the concept of farmers’ engagement. As such, eight categories of farmers’ engagement with the Oklahoma Farm to School Program emerged. This research answers these value-rational questions (Flyvbjerg, 2001): (1) Which farmers gain, and which farmers lose, by which mechanisms of power? (2) Is this desirable? (3) What should be done? Results provide evidence of geographically uneven development of a FTS program and incompatibilities between small- to midscale farming and the structure and governance of federal child-nutrition programs. Who benefits?: The intersection of governance and agency in farmers’ engagement with the Oklahoma Farm to School Program by Gina K. Thornburg B.S., University of Kansas, 1985 B.A., University of Kansas, 1985 M.A., California State University, Northridge, 2005 A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Geography College of Arts and Sciences KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Bimal Kanti Paul Copyright © Gina K. Thornburg 2017. Abstract Farm-to-school (FTS) programs are promoted as direct-marketing opportunities for farmers. As such, they are regarded by advocates and state and federal agencies as a pathway to rural economic development. The implementation of FTS food procurement poses significant challenges, however. Farmers make decisions regarding whether or not to market products to schools after learning about the program and considering an array of signals from multiscalar policies and governance structures. Research to date has left a gap in understanding farmers’ agency as it relates to governance structures and policy signals. This research on farmers’ engagement with the Oklahoma FTS Program contributes evidence to bridge this gap by examining the experiences not only of producers who participated in a FTS program but also of those who ceased participation or who chose not to participate. Employing a phronetic approach to social science, this explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods case study obtained quantitative and textual data from a mail survey, as well as data from two stints of qualitative fieldwork, in fall 2011 and fall 2012, which involved semistructured interviews and participant observation. Archival research completed the study methods used to gain a deeper understanding of farmers’ perspectives, practices, values, and experiences that informed their decisions to participate or not in a top-down-administered FTS program. Data collection was driven by the concept of farmers’ engagement. As such, eight categories of farmers’ engagement with the Oklahoma Farm to School Program emerged. This research answers these value-rational questions (Flyvbjerg, 2001): (1) Which farmers gain, and which farmers lose, by which mechanisms of power? (2) Is this desirable? (3) What should be done? Results provide evidence of geographically uneven development of a FTS program and incompatibilities between small- to midscale farming and the structure and governance of federal child-nutrition programs. Table of Contents List of Figures ...............................................................................................................................................................ix List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................................. x Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................................xi Dedication................................................................................................................................................................... xii Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of FTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Academic Studies on FTS Programs ......................................................................................................................... 4 Research Problem ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Statement of Purpose ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Research Questions.................................................................................................................................................... 6 Organization of the Dissertation ................................................................................................................................ 6 Significance of this Research ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2. Background and Setting ............................................................................................................................... 8 History of the National School Lunch Program ........................................................................................................ 8 The Genealogy of the FTS Campaign in the U.S. ................................................................................................... 11 Origins of the First FTS Programs: Governance and Funding ........................................................................... 14 Three of the First FTS Programs ........................................................................................................................ 15 The Small Farms/School Meals Initiative/DoD Fresh ....................................................................................... 19 Small Farms and Community Food Security ..................................................................................................... 20 Geographic Preference ....................................................................................................................................... 21 State FTS Programs: Heterogeneity of Governance Forms ..................................................................................... 21 Oklahoma: One of the First State-Coordinated FTS Programs .......................................................................... 22 Convergence of Federal Policy and FTS Campaign Goals ................................................................................ 23 School Expenditures on Local Foods: ................................................................................................................ 23 The Physical Setting of Oklahoma .......................................................................................................................... 24 The Population of Oklahoma ................................................................................................................................... 26 Oklahoma Agriculture ............................................................................................................................................. 27 Poverty and Hunger in Oklahoma ........................................................................................................................... 28 AAFIs in Oklahoma................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sustainable Management of Unused Eastern Redcedar: an Integrated Spatial and Economic Analysis Approach - Sciencedirect
    1/28/2021 Sustainable management of unused eastern redcedar: An integrated spatial and economic analysis approach - ScienceDirect Download Resources, Conservation and Recycling Volume 158, July 2020, 104806 Full length article Sustainable management of unused eastern redcedar: An integrated spatial and economic analysis approach Ravneet Kaur , Omkar Joshi , Rodney E. Will , Bryan D. Murray Show more Outline Share Cite https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104806 Get rights and content Highlights • ERC has caused considerable economic and ecological losses in Oklahoma. • Utilization of ERC biomass would contribute $96 million to Oklahoma's economy. • A new ERC-based bioproducts industry would generate over 300 jobs in Oklahoma. Abstract The changes in native forest and grassland management regimes following European settlement, particularly fire exclusion, have prompted the growth of fire intolerant woody tree species such as eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana). Eastern redcedar is a native species that has encroached into the prairies and forests of the southern Great Plains of the United States. Over the past few decades, the state of Oklahoma has witnessed considerable ecological and economic losses due to the widespread encroachment of eastern redcedar. This study performed an economic impact analysis in conjunction with a spatial analysis to understand the impacts of the introduction of new eastern redcedar-based bioproducts industries on the economy of Oklahoma. The results suggested that the new eastern redcedar industry manufacturing particleboard, mulch, and oil would contribute an additional USD 96 million per year to the economy of Oklahoma, while generating 319 employment opportunities. In addition, the spatial analysis identified two hotspot clusters suggesting that the existing biomass in the northwest and southeast counties of the state could sustain the bioproducts industry for two to ten decades based on the annual feedstock requirement of different operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Academic Standards Social Studies
    OKLAHOMA ACADEMIC SOCIAL STANDARDS STUDIES Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies Introduction Table of Contents Introduction 3 8th Grade 32 Social Studies Practices 6 Economics 41 Pre-Kindergarten 8 Oklahoma History 45 Kindergarten 9 Psychology 51 1st Grade 11 United States Government 54 2nd Grade 13 United States History 58 3rd Grade 15 World Geography 67 4th Grade 18 World History 70 5th Grade 21 Sociology 75 th 6 Grade 26 Appendix A: Social Studies Practices 78 Vertical Progression 7th Grade 29 Page 2 Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies Introduction Introduction The draft Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies is the result of the contributions of hundreds of social studies educators, representatives of higher education, tribal representatives, and community members. This document reflects a balanced synthesis of the work of all members of the Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies Writing and Draft Committees. The standards specify what students should know and be able to do as learners of social studies at the end of each grade level or social studies course. The order of the standards at any grade level is not meant to imply a sequence of topics and should be considered flexible for the organization of any course. The Oklahoma Academic Standards for Social Studies were informed by the National Council of the Social Studies (NCSS) Skills Framework , the Center for Civic Education Civics Standards, the National Council for Geographic Education (NCGE) Geography for Life Standards, the Council for Economic Education Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics, the National Council for History Education (NCHE) Habits of Mind, the National Center for History in the Schools Standards for Historical Thinking, the Oklahoma Academic Standards for English Language Arts and Social Studies, and other states’ standards documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Pembrook Trent Thesis.Pdf (922.5Kb)
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRIBAL GAMING ON NON-NATIVE COMMUNITIES IN OKLAHOMA USING L.O.S.T. DATA A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS By TRENT ALLEN PEMBROOK Norman, Oklahoma 2017 THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TRIBAL GAMING ON NON-NATIVE COMMUNITIES IN OKLAHOMA USING L.O.S.T. DATA A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF NATIVE AMERICAN STUDIES BY Dr. Heather Shotton, Chair Dr. Amanda Cobb-Greetham Dr. Jerry Bread Sr. © Copyright by TRENT ALLEN PEMBROOK 2017 All Rights Reserved. Acknowledgements I am grateful to all those with whom I have had to opportunity to work with during this process. This work would not have been possible without the support of the members of my Thesis Committee: Dr. Heather Shotton, Dr. Amanda Cobb- Greetham, and Dr. Jerry Bread Sr. Karen Haught has been instrumental in the review process of my thesis. I am especially indebted to Dr. Jerry Bread Sr. for his guidance throughout my time in the Native American Studies Department. Finally, and most importantly, I wish to thank my parents for their lifetime of hard work, always striving to provide the best opportunities for me. Their focus on education has been invaluable. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements...................................................................................iv List of Figures..........................................................................................vii Chapter 1: Introduction..............................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Economic and Job Growth
    Oil and Natural Gas Stimulate Oklahoma Economic and Job Growth Oil and natural gas are driving the U.S. economy through a major energy boom and that boom is rippling through the economy of Oklahoma, supporting business activity across the state. This finding grows out of a new American Petroleum Institute survey of domestic oil and natural gas $39 BILLION vendors,1 which offers a glimpse into the job and business creation engine that THE INDUSTRY CONTRIBUTES is the current oil and natural gas industry. The survey shows that at least 2,513 businesses, spread across all five of Oklahoma’s congressional districts, are part TO OKLAHOMA’S ECONOMY of the larger oil and natural gas supply chain. The survey’s snapshot of state-by-state income, is in terms of salary.3 While the activity reinforces the impressive level average annual salary in Oklahoma across of industry success throughout the all industries and sectors is $42,733, the country that is documented in a recent average salary in the oil and gas industry 364,300 PriceWaterhouseCoopers study conducted (excluding gas stations) is very significantly for the American Petroleum Institute.2 higher—$93,992 annually. Overall the The study found that the oil and natural industry supports $39 billion of the OKLAHOMA JOBS gas industry in Oklahoma supports some Oklahoma economy. That’s 23.1 percent 364,300 jobs, which is 16.8 percent of the of the state’s total economic activity. state’s total employment. The amount of supported BY OIL AND Oklahoma labor income supported by the Oklahoma ranks 5th in oil and 4th in natural natural GAS industry oil and natural gas industry comes to $23.3 gas production.4 That makes it one of the billion annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview and Summary of Recent Initiatives
    Overview and Summary of Recent Initiatives In the summer of 2003, Governor Brad Henry initiated the Economic Oevelopment Generating Excellence (EDGE) project, which included the recommendation to "Transform Oklahoma into the w Research Capital of the Plains ." The EDGE plan proposed to achieve this by establishing a $1 billion research endowment. Under the leadership of the Governor, plans to fund the $1 billion EDGE endowment and structure and operate the endowment to support research and technology transfer in the private and public sector are progressing. During the 2005 legislative session, in a flISt step toward this objective, HB 1193 created the Dynamic Economy and Budget Security Fund, which promotes research and development of critical sectors of the statc's economy. The Legislature and Governor authorized the deposit of approximately $93 million into the fund. In the 2006 legislative session, that $93 million was used to fund other projects, but the money was replaced with new funding in the amount of$150 million. In March, 2005 Governor Brad Henry signed legislation establishing a $475 million bond issue for a slate of higher education projects, much of which targets research and laboratory facilities. The Oklahoma Higher Education Promise of Exce1lence Act of2005 also provided $25 million wthe foml ofa bond bank to fmance future improvements at the state's colleges and universities. The final $125 million in bonds of the $475 million total is scheduled to be sold in the spring of 2006. Among the projects to be funded with bond proceeds are the following: • University of Oklahoma: A long-proposed cancer center; the first phase of a multiphase project for a new, freestanding, Chemistry and Biochemistry teaching and research-laboratory complex; and constnlction of a College of Allied Health Phase II building.
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Studies 3 — Citizenship Literacy Content Standard 1: the Student Will Analyze the Traits of Good Citizens
    3 - Social Studies – Oklahoma Studies 3 — Citizenship Literacy Content Standard 1: The student will analyze the traits of good citizens. 1. Commemorate Celebrate Freedom Week by recognizing the sacrifices and contributions to American freedom by veterans and by reciting the social contract selection from the Declaration of Independence: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. 2. Examine and determine the main purposes of Oklahoma’s state government and identify representative leaders of the state of Oklahoma and the three branches of government. (CCRIT 2) 3. Describe the connection between the historic significance of past events and people and the symbols of Oklahoma’s history including the Oklahoma State Seal and the Oklahoma Flag. (CCRIT 3) 4. Describe relationships between people and events of the past which are commemorated on Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Washington’s Birthday, Lincoln’s Birthday, Flag Day, and Independence Day. (CCRIT 3) 3 — Economic Literacy Content Standard 2: The student will identify and describe basic economic activities creating prosperity in the state of Oklahoma. 1. Summarize how scarcity and surplus require people to make choices about producing and consuming goods and services. (CCRIT 2) 2. Compare differences among human, natural, and capital resources used to produce goods and services. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Conditions, Freight Transport
    2010–2035 Oklahoma Long Range Transportation Plan nation’s, which registered a CAGR of 0.8 per- Chapter 5 Oklahoma Economic cent over the same period. High oil prices and Conditions and Freight Transportation mining sector expansion are partly responsible Background Economic Information for the State’s higher employment growth, as are the State’s expanding service sectors. Overview of Oklahoma Economy In 2009, a total of 1.7 million persons worked in The Oklahoma economy has evolved signifi- Oklahoma, and over 95 percent of this group cantly over the past two decades. Since the oil worked non-farm jobs (Figure 5-2). The largest price collapse in the mid-1980s and the subse- employer is health care and social assistance, quent economic slowdown, Oklahoma has while state and local government, manufac- become less dependent on its natural economic turing, professional and business services, and resource bases of energy and agriculture. retail trade continue to be a major source of the Although they remain an important part of State’s employment. While agriculture is an Oklahoma’s economy, other sectors, such as important contributor to State GSP, the industry services and manufacturing, have grown in is not labor-intensive. relative importance. As a result, the Oklahoma economy has become more diverse than it was Major Industries 20 years ago. Agriculture Industry 1 In 2008, the Gross State Product (GSP ) of Okla- Oklahoma is one of the nation’s largest homa was $108 billion, accounting for producers of livestock and wheat, generating one percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product $5.8 billion in value of agricultural products in (GDP).
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth and Persistence of Cities: Evidence from the Oklahoma’S First Fifty Years of Urban Growth∗
    The Birth and Persistence of Cities: Evidence from the Oklahoma’s First Fifty Years of Urban Growth∗ John C. Brown and David Cuberes December 2020 Abstract This paper examines the influence of first- and second-nature forces on the process of city formation in Oklahoma from 1890 through 1930. The natural experiment offered by the opening up of previously unoccupied land for settlement in central Oklahoma in 1889 and the rapid initial settlement reveals that population density was highest near railroads and pre-existing sites of (modest) habitation. Persistence or second-nature forces dominate in explaining population growth over the first decade of settlement. The oil boom of 1900 to 1930 altered the productivity potential of many locations in Oklahoma. Oil shocks increased population in those areas most profoundly affected. We also find evidence that the effect of the shock is larger in areas with higher initial population density and places with a higher initial population. The adverse impact of erosion is clearly apparent in the place regressions while it has no impact on township population density. Keywords: city formation; urban agglomerations; locational fundamentals; natural experiment JEL Codes: N9, R1 1 Introduction Urban economists have long been interested in understanding the origin of urban agglomerations. As Fujita et al. (1999) show, in a featureless plane, without some sort of increasing returns, there should be no reason why population would optimally choose to agglomerate in a specific location. At the same time, there is plenty of evidence that human settlements have long been very much influenced by natural advantages such as proximity to the sea or to a river or a moderate climate.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of District Twenty-One, United Mine Workers of America
    A HISTORY OF DISTRICT TWENTY-ONE, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA ' I I By JOHN HERSCHEL BARNHILL H Bachelor of Arts Texas A & I University at Corpus Christi Corpus Christi, Texas 1976 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 1978 /ht::,,·~ 1978 b262h A HISTORY OF DISTRICT TWENTY-ONE, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA Thesis Approved: Dean of the Graduate College 1019368 ii PREFACE The purpose of this work is to discuss the rise and decline of District Twenty-one of the United Mine Workers of America. The dis­ trict became a major force in Oklahoma after successfully gaining recognition by the mine owners of Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas in 1903. Its greatest moment came in the Oklahoma constitutional conven­ tion of 1907 where Pete Hanraty of the miners served as vice-president. For two decades, the union was a major factor in the Oklahoma Federa­ tion of Labor and helped to gain significant benefits for the working men and women of the state. In the 1920s, the miners' organization began the long period of decline in which the lessening demand for coal and internal and external problems resulted in the loss of the district's autonomy in 1929. After that year, the district became de­ pendent for its survival on the strength of the national organization. The history of District Twenty-one is important because the union was so influential in the early development of the state and because it reflects national trends in the United Mine Workers of America.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Products Industry: Research Paper PNW-363 July 1986 Performance and Contribution to the State's Economy, 1970 to 1980
    United States 4~ Department of Agriculture OKLAHOMA'S ~J c~-u3 Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Forest Products Industry: Research Paper PNW-363 July 1986 Performance and Contribution to the State's Economy, 1970 to 1980 Wilbur R. Maki, Con H Schallau, Bennett B. Foster, and Clair H. Redmond q~ Abbreviations States Industries AL Alabama FPI ForestProducts Industry AR Arkansas LWP Lumber and Wood FL Florida Products GA Georgia PAP Paperand Allied KY Kentucky Products LA Louisiana WF WoodFurniture MS Mississippi NC North Carolina OK Oklahoma SC South Carolina TN Tennessee TX Texas VA Virginia SO South US United States Authors WILBUR R. MAKI is a professor, University of Minnesota, Department of Agri- cultural and Applied Economics, St. Paul 55108. CON H SCHALLAU is a research economist at the Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3200 Jefferson Way, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. BENNETT B. FOSTER and CLAIR H. REDMOND are, respectively, forest economist and economist, USDA Forest Ser- vice, Southern Region, State and Private Forestry, 1720 Peachtree Road N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30367. Abstract Maki, Wilbur R.; Schallau, Con H; Foster, Bennett B.; Redmond, Clair H. Oklahoma's forest products industry: performance and :contribution to the State's economy, 1970 to 1980. Res. Pap. PNW-363. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; 1986. 22 p. Employment and earnings in Oklahoma's forest products industry, like those of most Southern States, grew significantly between 1970 and 1980. In fact, Oklahoma's share of the Nation's forest products employment and earnings in- creased during this period.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Oklahoma - an Introduction to the Sooner State from NETSTATE.COM
    The State of Oklahoma - An Introduction to the Sooner State from NETSTATE.COM HOME INTRO The State of Oklahoma SYMBOLS ALMANAC ore than 50 languages are spoken in ECONOMY M GEOGRAPHY the state of Oklahoma. There are 55 STATE MAPS distinct Indian tribes that make the state PEOPLE their home, and each of these tribes has GOVERNMENT its own language or dialect. The colorful FORUM history of the state includes Indians, NEWS cowboys, battles, oil discoveries, dust COOL SCHOOLS storms, settlements initiated by offers of STATE QUIZ STATE LINKS free land, and forced resettlements of BOOK STORE entire tribes. MARKETPLACE NETSTATE.STORE Oklahoma, the Sooner State Oklahoma's Indian heritage is honored in NETSTATE.MALL its official state seal and flag. At the GUESTBOOK center of the seal is a star, and within CONTACT US each of the five arms of the star are symbols representing each of the five tribes (the "Five Civilized Tribes") that House Flags were forcefully resettled into the From $5.99 territory of Oklahoma. The tribes Great Selection. depicted on the seal are the Creeks, the Unbeatable Prices. Chickasaw, the Choctaw, the Cherokee, Flags For Every and the Seminoles. The present Season & Reason. www.discountdecorati… Oklahoma state flag depicts an Indian war shield, stars, eagle feathers, and an Indian peace pipe, as well as a white Find Birth man's symbol for peace, an olive branch. Records Online THE STATE NAME: 1) Search Birth Records for Free 2) Find the Oklahoma is a word that was made up by the native American missionary Allen Records Instantly! Birth.Archives.com Wright.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Deposits and Resources of Oklahoma An
    Page 10, Mineral Deposits and Resources EDUCATIONAL PUBLICATION 9: 2008 EXPLANATION Area underlain by bituminous coal or lignite Mine (10) Principal outcrop area Pit (4) Principal outcrop area Quarry (9) Principal outcrop area Quarry (22) Area of many abandoned mines Principal outcrop area Quarry/Mine (79) Lime plant (1) OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION Area underlain by salt AND FACILITIES OF OKLAHOMA Plant (2) Salt plain Dan T. Boyd, Oklahoma Geological Survey MINERAL DEPOSITS AND RESOURCES OF OKLAHOMA (Exclusive of Oil and Gas) Kenneth S. Johnson, Oklahoma Geological Survey Oklahoma’s mineral resources, produced in all 77 counties, in- nonfuel-mineral and coal production in Oklahoma during 2004 was in feldspar; seventh in common clays produced; and eighth in indus- economy of Oklahoma, although metals are no longer produced. clude: nonfuel minerals such as limestone, gypsum, salt, clays, io- $558 million. Leading commodities produced during 2004 were trial sand and gravel. The Miami-Picher area of Ottawa County was a center for lead-zinc dine, and sand and gravel; coal; and petroleum (crude oil and natural crushed stone (valued at $195 million), portland cement (production Important reserves of certain high-purity minerals suitable as raw production in the world-famous Tri-State Mining District of north- gas). In recent years, the mineral industry has been the State’s great- data withheld), construction sand and gravel ($54 million), coal ($51 materials for manufacture of various chemicals include high-calci- eastern Oklahoma, southeastern Kansas, and southwestern Mis- est source of revenue. In 2004, the combined value of petroleum, million), industrial sand and gravel ($32 million), gypsum ($21 mil- um limestone, high-purity dolomite, and glass sand in south-central souri.
    [Show full text]