DOCSLIB.ORG

Shuttle Performance Augmentationwith the Titan Liquid Boost Module

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shuttle Performance Augmentationwith the Titan Liquid Boost Module The Space Congress® Proceedings 1980 (17th) A New Era In Technology Apr 1st, 8:00 AM Shuttle Performance Augmentationwith the Titan Liquid Boost Module Arthur E. Inman LBM Project Engineer, Space Launch Systems, Martin Marietta Corporation John G. Muehlbauer LBM Engine Project Engineer, Rocket Engineering, Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Inman, Arthur E. and Muehlbauer, John G., "Shuttle Performance Augmentationwith the Titan Liquid Boost Module" (1980). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 1. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1980-17th/session-1/1 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SHUTTLE PERFORMANCE AUGMENTATION WITH THE TITAN LIQUID BOOST MODULE Arthur E. Inman John G. Muehlbauer LBM Project Engineer LBM Engine Project Engineer Space Launch Systems Rocket Engineering Martin Marietta Corporation Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company Denver, Colorado Sacramento, California ABSTRACT by the space agency during the summer and fall of 1979, the decision was made to adopt the The projected 24000 pound payload lift cap­ Titan Liquid Boost Module (LBM) as the base­ ability for the baseline Space Shuttle, with line Thrust Augmentation System. The LBM anticipated arbiter and external tank weight consists of the Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company's savings programs implemented, will not meet current Titan 34B Stage I engine with Titan . the 32000 pound payload requirements for the type tanks, feed lines and a support truss DOD Mission 4 from Vandenberg Air Force Base, which will be manufactured by Martin Marietta NASA has selected the Titan Liquid Boost Module Corporation. The module will be attached to (LBM) to provide thrust augmentation during the aft end of the external tank and will the boost phase sufficient to meet and provide occupy the space between the Solid Rocket margin for the defined Mission 4 requirements. Boosters. The LBM will use Titan 34D Stage I engines and a cluster of four Titan derived 10 foot diam­ eter tanks. The module will be attached to COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS the aft end of the ET. This paper will pro­ vide a description of the LBM and discuss some The decision to adopt the Titan LBM System was of its advantages and capabilities based on technical, cost and programmatic reasons. Included were consideration of pay- load capability, man-rating» development risk, INTRODUCTION cost per payload pound, system loads and opera­ tional flexibility. Utilization of the exist­ The Space Transportation System (STS) must ing Aerojet/Martin Titan team "know-how" and have a payload lift capability of-32,000 pounds facilities is another plus for the LBM system to meet the requirements of DOD Reference as well as being a benefit to the Air Force in Mission 4 from Vandenberg Air Force Base. The maintaining Titan III technology and capabil­ projected Mission 4 capability of the /baseline ity.': -/. ' ' '.. ' ,'.: ,-; ' .- -. '.- STS is only 24,000 pounds considering.a weight savings program of 5,100 pounds for the Orbiter Because the Titan LBM is based upon proven and 6,000 pounds for-the External Tank (ET) hardware* minimal development risks are in­ and 109% of Rated'Power Level for the Space. '. curred. The system will use the existing Stage Shuttle Main.Engine (SSME) . ' I Titan 34D engine, developed to its present state by testing and flights conducted during Recognizing that additional weight .savings the past 20 years. Martin Marietta will build programs and state-of-the-art performance the 10-ft diameter tanks (same as Titan) utili­ improvements on the baseline STS would not zing technology, materials, facilities and make up the performance deficit, NASA, in 1978, techniques developed for the Titan systems. initiated.analyses of performance augmenta­ tion concepts. Early studies were centered- Initial studies by NASA with the solids options on combinations of solid motors strapped onto indicated that it would have been difficult to the Solid Rocket Boosters and clusters of keep below the maximum STS allowable dynamic solid rocket motors attached beneath the ET. pressure of 650 pounds per square foot. The In early 1979 Martin Marietta Corporation and Titan LBM system, with its lower thrust being Aerojet Liquid Rocket Company presented a applied over a longer flight time will not thrust augmentation concept which utilized violate the maximum pressure constraint. Titan technology,, hardware and propellants. Accordingly, the LBM will provide a softer Subsequent to further comparative analysis ride to shuttle payloads and less severe load- 1-66 ing during launch for the STS vehicle as a fuel) . Engine shutdown will be initiated by whole. propellant depletion which is a standard mode for Titan III Stage I engines. After shutdown The LBM, as currently concepted, will provide the module will be jettisoned. an increase in the anticipated Mission 4 payload capability of more than 17,000 pounds. The Titan Liquid Boost Module offers great This would bring the capability of the flexibility in operation. Although the tanks Thrust Augmented STS to over 41,000 pounds. are being sized to carry propellants for 200 (Figure 1) seconds burn time, missions that require less thrust augmentation can be accommodated by off NASA estimates indicate development costs loading the LBM tanks to provide a burn time would have been comparable for both the solid compatible with mission requirements. Pay- strap-on and the LBM options. While the cost load growth can be achieved by simply filling per flight estimate is higher for LBM aug­ the baseline tanks to a minimum ullage level, mented flights, costs per pound of payload providing additional auxiliary pressurization delivered is more favorable. NASA estimates and extending the engine burn duration to 225 these costs at approximately $1,700 per pound seconds. Other growth options are available for the strap-on solid version compared to by adding additional tank capability or add­ $1,500 per pound for the LBM. ing additional engine subassemblies. Because the LBM augmented STS shows such a TITAN-LBM generous performance margin over the Mission ENGINE 4. requirements, considerable mission planning The current Stage I, Titan III engine for the flexibility will be available. For instance, Titan 34D (T34D) is a pump fed, hypergolic the SSME's could be programmed for less propellant engine. It consists of two iden­ operating time at 109% of rated power level tical subassemblies, each producing 264,500 during a mission, thereby enhancing the life pounds of thrust at altitude. The engine is expectancy of the engine. qualified to twelve 200 second burns. The Titan-LBM design flight duration is 200 LIQUID BOOST MODULE CONFIGURATION seconds. Major engine performance values are provided in Figure 3. The baseline configuration of the Titan Liquid Boost Module consists of four Titan-type ten Each subassembly is started by a solid pro­ foot diameter tanks (two fuel and two oxizi- pellant start cartridge fired into the two zer), a Titan 34D Stage I engine, a truss stage turbine system which is gearbox con­ that ties the tanks and engine together and nected to the fuel and oxidizer pumps. Rising a skirt assembly to attach the module to the fuel pressure opens the thrust chamber valves aft end of the external tank. The skirt allowing oxidizer to flow directly through assembly includes an ordnance separation the injector, into the thrust chamber plenum joint to allow the module to be jettisoned cavity. Fuel flows through the regeneratively from the ET after the propellants have been cooled 6:1 thrust chamber, into and through expended. As on Titan vehicles, an engine the injector causing the hypergolic ignition. heat shield assembly will be provided to A honeycomb constructed, fiberglass/phenolic protect the engine components from the launch resin ablative skirt expands the combustion environments. The heat shield will also pro­ gases to the final 15:1 area ration. tect components of an auxiliary helium Small amounts of pressurization system for the oxidizer tanks. each propellant are boot­ strapped off the thrust The major components are shown in Figure 2. chamber inlet lines to feed a gas generator which drives the The four propellant tanks will be arranged turbine during steady state operation. Some gas generator symmetrically with their centers on a 21.3 hot gas is subsequently cooled and provides autogenous foot circle under the ET. The LBM assembly pressurization to the fuel tank. will extend 24.2 feet below the liquid Similarly, oxidizer is tapped off the main discharge line, vaporized hydrogen tank dome on the external tank. The in a superheater and supplies module has an overall length of 34.6 feet autogenous pressur­ ization to the oxidizer from the attachment to the liquid hydrogen tank, tank at the barrel to dome ring frame to the The entire engine system is supported by a exit plane of the LBM engines. tubular constructed, steel engine frame. Mechanical and electrical interfaces are The LBM engines will be ignited five seconds nearly identical to Titan 34D excepting only after SRB ignition and will burn for 200 the autogenous plumbing interface locations. seconds. This LBM engine start sequence is designed to minimize launch facility impacts. The T34D launch vehicle first stage consists During operation, the engine will burn of one each oxidizer and fuel tank. Space 350,000 pounds of hypergolic propellants constraints under the STS External Tank re­ (nitrogen tetroxide oxidizer and Aerozine 50 sulted in the packaging of four propellant 1-67 tanks, a pair supplying each engine sub- PRQPELLANT TANKS assembly for the LBM. The packaging results in the addition of an identical fuel auto­ The four propellant tanks will be developed genous gas cooler and some fuel and oxidizer using technology, materials, facilities, autogenous plumbing rerouting.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy Statement Link at the Bottom of Aerojet Rocketdyne Websites
    Privacy Notice Aerojet Rocketdyne – For external use Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 3 Why we collect personal information? ............................................................................. 3 How we collect personal information? ............................................................................. 3 How we use information we collect? ............................................................................... 4 How we share your information? .................................................................................... 4 How we protect your personal information? ..................................................................... 4 How we collect consent? .............................................................................................. 4 How we provide you access? ........................................................................................ 4 How to contact Aerojet Rocketdyne privacy?.................................................................... 5 Collection of personal information .................................................................................. 5 Disclosure of personal information.................................................................................. 5 Sale of personal information .......................................................................................... 6 Children’s online privacy ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental, Social & Governance Report
    ESG Environmental, Social & Governance Report Aerojet Rocketdyne 2020 ESG Report Table of Contents About Us Aerojet Rocketdyne is a world-recognized supports our business and our efforts to meet Section One - Social Responsibility technology-based engineering and or exceed the expectations of our customers, Aerojet Rocketdyne Foundation .......................................................... 7 manufacturing company that develops and deliver best-in-class products and services, Employee Volunteer and Giving .......................................................... 8 produces specialized power and propulsion and uphold our high ethical standards while Sponsorship and Donations ................................................................ 8 systems, as well as armament systems. We conducting business with a regard for the develop and manufacture liquid and solid rocket preservation and protection of human safety, Employees and Community ................................................................. 9 propulsion, air-breathing hypersonic engines, health, and the natural environment. Human Resources and electric power and propulsion for space, Section Two - Our Shared Values of Accountability, defense, civil and commercial applications. Tuition Assistance Program ............................................................... 13 Adaptability, Excellence, Integrity and In addition, we are engaged in the rezoning, Scholarship Program ......................................................................... 14 Teamwork are intended
    [Show full text]
  • 10/2/95 Rev EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Report, Entitled "Hazard
    10/2/95 rev EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, entitled "Hazard Analysis of Commercial Space Transportation," is devoted to the review and discussion of generic hazards associated with the ground, launch, orbital and re-entry phases of space operations. Since the DOT Office of Commercial Space Transportation (OCST) has been charged with protecting the public health and safety by the Commercial Space Act of 1984 (P.L. 98-575), it must promulgate and enforce appropriate safety criteria and regulatory requirements for licensing the emerging commercial space launch industry. This report was sponsored by OCST to identify and assess prospective safety hazards associated with commercial launch activities, the involved equipment, facilities, personnel, public property, people and environment. The report presents, organizes and evaluates the technical information available in the public domain, pertaining to the nature, severity and control of prospective hazards and public risk exposure levels arising from commercial space launch activities. The US Government space- operational experience and risk control practices established at its National Ranges serve as the basis for this review and analysis. The report consists of three self-contained, but complementary, volumes focusing on Space Transportation: I. Operations; II. Hazards; and III. Risk Analysis. This Executive Summary is attached to all 3 volumes, with the text describing that volume highlighted. Volume I: Space Transportation Operations provides the technical background and terminology, as well as the issues and regulatory context, for understanding commercial space launch activities and the associated hazards. Chapter 1, The Context for a Hazard Analysis of Commercial Space Activities, discusses the purpose, scope and organization of the report in light of current national space policy and the DOT/OCST regulatory mission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future
    The Space Congress® Proceedings 1981 (18th) The Year of the Shuttle Apr 1st, 8:00 AM The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future J. K. Ganoung Manager Spacecraft Integration, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. H. Eaton Delta Launch Program, McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation Ganoung, J. K. and Eaton, H., "The Delta Launch Vehicle- Past, Present, and Future" (1981). The Space Congress® Proceedings. 7. https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1981-18th/session-6/7 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress® Proceedings by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE DELTA LAUNCH VEHICLE - PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE J. K. Ganoung, Manager H. Eaton, Jr., Director Spacecraft Integration Delta Launch Program McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Co. INTRODUCTION an "interim space launch vehicle." The THOR was to be modified for use as the first stage, the The Delta launch vehicle is a medium class Vanguard second stage propulsion system, was used expendable booster managed by the NASA Goddard as the Delta second stage and the Vanguard solid Space Flight Center and used by the U.S. rocket motor became Delta's third stage. Government, private industry and foreign coun­ Following the eighteen month development program tries to launch scientific, meteorological, and failure to launch its first payload into or­ applications and communications satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • RS-25 for NASA's Space Launch System
    AEROJET ROCKETDYNE PROPRIETARY 0 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS NO EXPORT CONTROLLED – ITAR/USML CATEGORY IV September 2016 Aerojet Rocketdyne Footprint International Offices: Redmond, WA Moscow Tokyo London Belfast UAE Picatinny Arsenal, NJ Sacramento, CA Clearfield, UT ARDÉ, NJ Headquarters Washington, D.C. Denver, CO Gainesville, VA Orange, VA Los Angeles, CA Jonesboro, TN Vernon, CA Camden, AR Socorro, NM Tucson, AZ Huntsville, AL Headquarters Dallas, TX Orlando, FL Operating Locations Stennis, MS Eglin AFB, FL Field Offices West Palm Beach, FL Nearly 5,000 Employees Across 14 States 140 and Growing at NASA Stennis Space Center Aerojet Rocketdyne Proprietary 1 Aerojet Rocketdyne & NASA Stennis Space Center (SSC): A Fifty Year Partnership • NASA-SSC is the nation’s Center of Excellence for large space transportation propulsion systems testing • Tested each of the F-1 rocket engines that powered the first stage of the Saturn V launch vehicle for the Apollo missions • Early 1970s, SSC’s facilities were modified to test the space shuttle's main engines (SSMEs) • All the 405 flown engines supporting 135 shuttle flights tested and proven flight-worthy at SSC • SSC’s state-of-the-art facilities continues to assemble and test components and engines for future Space Launch System (SLS) missions (RS-25 and J-2X) • RS-68/A engines supporting the Delta IV program launching national security satellites and recently the Orion Capsule for NASA’s Exploration Flight Test-1 Aerojet Rocketdyne Proprietary 2 SSC Facilities Occupied by Aerojet Rocketdyne • A1 Test Stand– RS-25 (1st Stage booster for SLS) • Primary Customer – NASA • Aerojet Rocketdyne Test Article Contractor • B Test Stand • B1 - RS-68 (1st Stage booster for Delta-IV) • Primary Customer – Air Force (ULA) • Test Stand is operated under a Space Act Agreement • B2 (RS-25 Space Launch System Stage Testing) • B Complex Test Control Center (BTCC) • Engine Assembly Facility (EAF – Bldg.
    [Show full text]
  • AEHF-6 Launch Marks 500Th Flight of Aerojet Rocketdyne's RL10 Engine
    AEHF-6 Launch Marks 500th Flight of Aerojet Rocketdyne’s RL10 Engine March 27, 2020 CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., March 26, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The successful March 26 launch of the U.S. Space Force’s sixth and final Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) military communications satellite aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket marked the 500th flight of Aerojet Rocketdyne’s RL10 upper-stage engine. The RL10, which powers the ULA Atlas V Centaur upper stage, is one of several Aerojet Rocketdyne propulsion products supporting the mission. Aerojet Rocketdyne propulsion can be found on both the rocket and the AEHF-6 satellite. Built by Lockheed Martin, the AEHF satellites provide secure, jam-proof communications, including nuclear command and control, to U.S. and allied forces. “This launch marks an important milestone for Aerojet Rocketdyne and for the country,” said Eileen Drake, Aerojet Rocketdyne’s CEO and president. “The RL10 has supported a majority of the nation’s most important national security and scientific missions, including all of the AEHF satellites which provide communication links that are critical to our warfighters.” The Atlas V in the 551 configuration is the most powerful vehicle in the Atlas V family, featuring five Aerojet Rocketdyne AJ-60A solid rocket strap-on motors, each generating 348,500 pounds of thrust. Designed specifically to provide extra lifting power to the Atlas V, the AJ-60A is the world’s largest monolithic solid rocket motor ever flown. The AEHF-6 satellite, meanwhile, is outfitted with three different types of Aerojet Rocketdyne thrusters for attitude control, orbital station keeping and maneuvering.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Spacecraft Materials Using Reflectance Spectroscopy
    Characterization of spacecraft materials using reflectance spectroscopy Jacqueline A. Reyes University of Texas at El Paso-Jacobs JETS Contract, El Paso, TX 79968 Darren Cone University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968 ABSTRACT Materials interact with light in a unique manner due to their individual elemental composition. Elements emit different light energies that fall within the electromagnetic spectrum, therefore corresponding to a specified wavelength per element. The reflectance spectrum produced from common spacecraft materials can be used to assist with remote orbital debris material identification techniques and can be further related to debris albedo and size. Materials used in aerospace design, such as aluminum alloys, stainless steels, ceramics, silicone paints, and solar cells, have been substantially characterized using reflectance spectroscopic techniques. An Analytical Spectral Device (ASD) was utilized to perform characterization on various spacecraft and rocket body structures by producing a spectrum relatively unique to a material from its properties in response to light. The materials used as specimen for this investigation specifically belong to a Titan IIIC Transtage test article rocket body, stainless steel radar calibration spheres, and solar cells used to construct a Hughes/Boeing HS-376 spacecraft. The spectrum results of said materials are presented in the subsequent work to enhance current spectroscopic data of interest within aerospace and orbital debris communities. 1. INTRODUCTION The space industry has succeeded in launching various spacecraft into Earth orbit to explore the nature of our space environment. This originated with the launch of the first satellite, Sputnik, on October 4, 1957 [1]. Since then, multiple space missions have been executed, leaving our near-Earth space environment populated with spacecraft.
    [Show full text]
  • BELLCOMM, INC. Case 720 23 P Unclas
    3 e--* I ', - -,p. .. - BELLCOMM, INC. 1100 Seventeenth Street, N.W. WkhingtoL D. C. 20036 SUBJECT: Selected Comments on Agena and DATE: March 26, 1968 Titan I11 Family Stages Case 720 FROM: C. Bendersky ABSTRACT This memo presents (unclassified) comments on the status of Lockheed Agena and Titan I11 family propulsion stages gathered to support current NASA Orbital Workshop Studies. (VASA-CR-955 11) SELECTED COMMENTS ON AGENA N79-72086 AND TITAN 3 FAHILY STAGES (Eellcomrn, Inc-) 23 P Unclas 00/75 11184 BELLCOMM,INC. 1100 Seventeenth Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. 20036 SUBJECT: Selected Comments on Agena and DATE: March 26, 1968 Titan I11 Family Stages Case 720 FROM: C. Bendersky MEMORANDUM FOR FILE This memo presents (unclassified) comments on the status of both the Lockheed Agena Space Propulsion Systems and the Martin Titan I11 booster family. The data presented were primarily obtained during a visit to Lockheed, Sunnyvale, Cali- fornia, January 23 and Martin, Denver, Colorado, January 24-25, 1968l. H. S. London was present 3t Martin. This memo will dis- cuss specific operational features of the subject stages of cur- rent interest to the hlorkshop B & C study. The detailed charac- teristics of the stases and flight performance data are available upon request from this writer. This memo reports information available as of February 1, 1968 and will be updated as warranted. 1.0 AGENA STAGES It must be emphasized that the available Aaena has achieved a high degree of reliability through flights on Thor, Atlas and Titan boosters. For example, more than 10 Titan IIIB/ Agenas have been successfully flown from the Western Test Range (NTR).
    [Show full text]
  • SLS Case Study
    CASE STUDY Supporting Space Flight History with the Space Launch System (SLS) Technetics Group is a proud sup- Boeing representatives held a sup- plier to NASA, Boeing and Aerojet plier recognition presentation for Rocketdyne, and proved instru- the Technetics team members, mental in working with these orga- citing outstanding performance nizations on the development of in providing hydraulic accumula- NASA’s Space Launch System (SLS). tors and reservoirs for the Thrust The SLS is an advanced, heavy-lift Vector Control hydraulic system, BELFAB Edge-Welded launch vehicle that will send astro- located within the Core Stage of Metal Bellows nauts into deep space and open the rocket. Technetics was one up the possibility for missions to of the first suppliers on the pro- Qualiseal Mechanical neighboring planets. The program gram to have provided all Flight 1 Seals is enabling humans to travel fur- requirements and subsystem test ther into space than ever before units. and paving the way for new sci- Aerojet Rocketdyne also rec- entific discoveries and knowledge ognized Technetics and stated that was once out of reach. that Technetics “has gone above Technetics has worked closely and beyond to produce quality with program design teams for hardware and support aggressive critical applications for the Core schedules,” and that “Technetics Stage and Upper Stage on the SLS. efforts and those of Technetics NAFLEX Seals Specifically, a number of preci- employees have not gone unno- sion sealing solutions and fluid ticed.” To express their appre- management components were ciation, Aerojet Rocketdyne needed for Aerojet Rocketdyne’s representatives visited the RS-25 and RL10 engines to ensure Technetics Deland, FL facility to the integrity of the overall system.
    [Show full text]
  • Titan Iv Requirements
    OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL TITAN IV REQUIREMENTS Report No. 94-089 April 21, 1994 Department of Defense Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of this report, contact the Secondary Reports Distribution Unit, Audit Planning and Technical Support Directorate, at (703) 614-6303 (DSN 224-6303) or FAX (703) 614-8542. Suggestions for Future Audits To suggest ideas for or to request future audits, contact the Planning and Coordination Branch, Audit Planning and Technical Support Directorate, at (703) 614-1868 (DSN 224-1868) or FAX (703) 614-8542. Ideas and requests can also be mailed to: Inspector General, Department of Defense OAIG-AUD (ATTN: APTS Audit Suggestions) 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, Virginia 22202-2884 DoD Hotline To report fraud, waste, or abuse, call the DoD Hotline at (800) 424-9098 (DSN 223-5080) or write to the DoD Hotline, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C. 20301-1900. The identity of writers and callers is fully protected. Acronyms FYDP Future Years Defense Program IV&V Independent Verification and Validation OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense RFP Request for Proposal SLAG Space Launch Advisory Group SPO System Program Office SRM Solid Rocket Motor SRMU Solid Rocket Motor Upgrade INSPECTOR GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 400 ARMY NAVY DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202-2884 April 21, 1994 MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) SUBJECT: Audit Report on Titan IV Requirements (Report No. 94-089) We are providing this audit report for your review and comments. It discusses requirements for the Titan IV expendable launch vehicle and for independent validation and verification of critical computer resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Titan II Small Multisatellite Mission Approach
    I I Titan II Small Multisatellite Mission Approach Aubrey J. Butts I David F. Giere Bruce M. French Martin Marietta Astronautics Group John J. Kusnierek I Space Systems Division, USAF At the present time, small satellite programs are faced with the dilemma that they are I sometimes so small that they cannot afford the expense of a dedicated Expendable Launch Vehicle (EL V) and. therefore, must attempt to find a way to get into orbit as a secondary payload. This paper discusses another alternative, the use of a Titan II as a dedicated launch vehicle for a group of small satellites. Launches could be scheduled on a periodic I basis as a function of predicted need. The Titan II has the capability of inserting total payload weight of 3,000 to 4,000 lbs. into high-inclination, low-earth orbits and smaller payloads to higher orbits. Orbit changes are possible depending on the altitudes and I payloads weights involved. Payload fairings are available for small and large payloads. Since the total payload could conceivably consist of satellites from several unrelated programs, some type of mission "broker" or central contracting agency would be needed to develop and implement a multisatellite mission. This paper offers an approach to I implementing a mission of this type that would allow small satellites to schedule a launch on the T -II multisatellite carrier at a predetermined launch date during each year. The costs would be shared between payloads on the basis of weight and volume. This gives those small satellite programs a launch option that would provide on-orbit operation at a I predetermined time.
    [Show full text]