DOCSLIB.ORG

Protocol of Amendment to the Mutual Defense Cooperation Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protocol of Amendment to the Mutual Defense Cooperation Agreement TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 20-213 ________________________________________________________________________ DEFENSE Cooperation Agreement Between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GREECE Amending Agreement of July 8, 1990, as Extended Signed at Athens October 5, 2019 Entered into force February 13, 2020 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 (80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)— “. .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence . of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.” PROTOCOL OF AMENDMENT TOTHE . MUTUAL DEFENSE COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC The Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Hellenic Republic, hereinafter referred to as "the Parties"; Aclqiowledging the Mutual Defense Cooperation Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Hellenic Republic, with Annex, done at Athens July 8, 1990, which entered into force November 6, I 990, as extended (the Agreement"); and . Desiring to amend the Annex to the Agreement, Have agreed as follows: Article I Within the Annex to the Agreement: 1. Delete paragraphs B. l .a. and B. l .c. and re-designate paragraph B. l .b. as paragraph B.1.a.; 2. Insert the following new paragraph B.lb. after paragraph B.la. as re-designated (formerly paragraph B.l.b.): ·,,Non:contiguous support facilities ofSouda Air Base within Souda Naval Base Marathi area as addressed in existing or future agreements or arrangements." 3. Replace paragraph B.2.(a) in its entirety with: "Consistent with the purposes of this Agreement and pursuant to Article I thereof, and as further detailed in implementing agreements or arrangements, the Government of the United States is authorized to maintain and operate the military and supporting facilities within the Hellenic Armed Forces installations identified below: 0). ,:Larissa Air•B~ • . W,{(il}, ·(· . Stefanovikio Army Aviation Base (Stefanovikio Airport) .. ~· ~-· ,.· 'c;J.if'' ,,,Othe; Hellenic Armed Forces installatioiis, as mutually agreed by the "'·' .Parties or their designated representatives, in accordance with their respective internal procedures.,, . 4. DelereparagraphsB.3. and B.4. and renumber all subsequent paragraphs accordingly . 5. Replace paragraph B.3. (formerly paragraph B.5.) in its entirety with the following: ~'The Government of the United States is authorized to carry out, at the facilities identified in paragraph B.l. above, the following missions and activities: · - Operation, maintenance, and support of United States maritime patrol and reconnaissance aircraft and limited conduct of technical ground processing . ..:Operation, maintenance, and support of airlift and logistic support, including tanker aircraft. - Communications (intra- and extra-station), including Armed Forces Radio and Teleyision Services. The Souda Air Base will utilize those frequencies assigned ·····•bYthe Government ofthe·Hellenic Republic in conformity with standard · international communication procedures. The Government of the Hellenic Republic will assign adequate frequencies for the mission of the Souda Air Base. Any change of frequencies will be subject to the prior concurrence of the Government of the Hellenic Republic. Television signals will be encoded for · exclusive use of United States forces personnel. ..: Supporting administrative and logistic activities. - Visits; training; exercises; maneuvers; transit; support and related activities; refueling ·of aircraft; landing and recovery of aircraft; temporary maintenance of vessels and aircraft; accommodation of personnel; staging and deploying of forces and materiel; pre7positioning of equipment, supplies, and materiel; joint and combined training activities; humanitarian and disaster relief activities; contingency operati~ns; and construction in support of mutually agreed activities. - Such other missions and activities as the Parties or their designated representatives may mutually determine, in accordance with their respective internal procedures." ,:frenum~red paragraph B.4. (fonnerly paragraph B.6.) in its·entirety with the '.,,,!',,', 'Government of the United States is authorized to carry ou4 at the facilities ·tied in paragraph B.2. above, the missions and activities as identified below: \Y' isits; training; exercises; maneuvers; transit; support and related ~tivities; "'',fueling of aircraft; bunkering of vessels; landing and recovery of aircraft; , ::"~porary maintenance of vehicles, vessels, and aircraft; accommodation of tPnnel; communications; staging and deploying of forces and materiel; pre­ /· :~i~~ning of equipment, supplies, and materiel; joint and combined training ··. ,··ties;humanitarian and disaster relief activities; contingency operations; , ,· · tion in support of mutually agreed activities. · '~ bered paragraph B.S.(a) (fonnerly paragraph B.7.(a)), replace "B.5.(b)" with tt~i~~the following new paragraph B.6. after renumbered paragraph B.S. and ,,w , ·renufuber all subsequent paragraphs accordingly: (:;:~i·i,,;c ~'{a) Consistent.with the purposes of this Agreement and understanding that ,,f ){':United States use of non-military installations and infrastructure in Greece is not ·\,t~~~e~~ to be year-round, continuous, or exclusive, the Government ~f the United / t·states,isgran~ priority status (unimpeded access and use) at areas within the :fri:)~ffons identified below as further detailed in implementing agreements or i/~tjf~gements: . (i) Port of Alexandroupolis (ii) Other locations as mutually agreed by the Parties or their designated representatives, in accordance with their respective internal procedures. ,,!J,):Such·status is for the purpose of scheduled and emergent requirements, in~liiding reception, staging, and onward movement, and other logistics and support '" · · ·e~,,as mutually determined. Scheduled access shall be coordinated with ,_pnate authorities of the Parties. Emergent access shall be provided following 'Jiffuts of notice." . · 9. Insert the following new paragraph B.9. after renumbered paragraph B.8.: "For the purposes of Section B of this Annex, the following shall be the designated representatives of the Parties: a. For the Government of the Hellenic Republic: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of National Defence. b. For the Government of the United States of America: the U.S. Department of Defense." 10. ~e~·the number""!.'? in front of the paragraph in Section D .. 11. Insert the following new paragraph D.2. after renumbered paragraph D. l .: ''The Parties recognize that command and control relationships between the .United States and Greek authorities at the Hellenic Anned Forces installations where · the facilities described in paragraphs B. l.b. and B.2. of this Annex exist differ from · those already established at the facility described in paragraph B. l .a. As such, command and control, as well as related operational and security matters, for the Hellenic Anned Forces installations described in paragraphs B.l.b. and B.2. of this Annex· are as addressed in existing or future agreements or arrangements, as appropriate." Article II This Protocol of Amendment shall enter into force on the date of the later note in an exchange of notes between the Parties indicating that each Party has completed its internal procedures necessary for entry into force of this Protocol. DONE at Athens, this fifth day of October, 2019, in duplicate, in the English and Greek languages, both texts being equally ~uthentic. FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FOR THEFOVERNMENT ·oF THE ..UNITED -,,u£{·_~ STATES OF AMERICA: HELLEN!~ REPUBLIC: IlPOTOKOAAO TPOilOilOIID:ID; 'fill: I:YMtlt~ AMOIB~ AMYNTIKH.I: I:YNEPrAI:IAI: METAEY ·, .THI: KYBEPNHI:Hl: TON HNOMENON IlOAITEinN THI: AMEPIKHI: KAI H Ku'3tpv11<rrJ trov HvIDµi;vOlv TTolttewv tT\c; AµeptlCT)c; Kat T) Kuf3tpv11<r11 tl)c; EllflVUCllc; AT)µoKpa~ e<ptgtc; avaq>ep6µev~ roe; «ta MEpT)», Avayvropi(ovr~ tTJ Iuµq>rovia Aµot(3a.~ Aµuv-rucftc; Iuvepya.~ µetQ.9> tl)c; Kuf3BpVTl<rrJc; tOlV HvroµtvIDv TTol1teu:i>v 'tl'lc; AµepuciJc; Kat t11c; Kuf3tpvTJ<JT}c; tl)c; EllflVUCllc; AT)µoKpa'tiac; µeta tOU TTapapntµatoc;, 7COU U7CO'Ypaq>T)K8 crtl)V A8ftva. cm.c; 8 IouA.iou 1990 mt tt8r)Ke CJ£ lCJXU <rt1'; 6 Noeµf3piou 1990, 01tIDc; mpata8rJKs (Tl «tuµq>IDvia» ), Kat Em8vµ<hvr~ va. tpo7t01to1ftCJouv to TTapap'tT)µa t11c; Iuµq>IDviac;, CJUµq>COVT)OUV ta. tgtc;: Ap8po I Ev-r~ 'tOU Ila.pa.pn)µatoc; tl)c; Iuµq>ro~: I. Aurypaq>OV'tat Ol mp<iypCLq>Ol B.1.( a.) mt B. 1. (y) Kat T) 1ta.pa:ypa~ B.1.(13) op~a.1. SK vtou roe; mpaypaq>oc; B.l .(a.). 2. TTpocrri.0sra.1. Tl a.K6A.Ou8r) vta. mpa:ypa.q>0c; B. l .(J3) µsra tTJV mpaypa.q>0 B.1.(a.) 61tCOc; aunt opiCJ8rtKe £K vtou (xpcbl)v 1ta.paypa.q>0c; B.l.(13)): « µ11 CJUVOpeoouCJ~ f30T)8r)tl.1Ct(; EuKOA.iec; tl\<; Aepo1top11CT)c; BaCJT)c; l:ouoac; £Vt6c; tT\<; NaunlCT)c; BaCJT)c; Iot'>6a.c; tT\c; 1t£P1.0XT1c; Ma.pa.8iou 61troc; Ka8op~ovtat CJ£ Uq>lCJ'taµevec; ft µe)J..ovn~t~ CJUµq>roviec; ft 61.EU8£nt?"tlc;». 3. AV'tl.Ka6ic:rta.-ra1 Tl 1ta.paypa.q>0c; B.2.(a.) CJ'to ot'>voA.6 tT\c; roe; egic;: «Ie CJUVS1tela 1tpoc; touc; CJK01t0t><; tl\<; Iuµq>ID~ at>ntc; Kat ot'>µcpcova. µe to ap8po I auntc;, Kat 61tcoc; 7tBpa.tttpco Ka.8op~stCll A.e1t't0µ£p©c; CJ6 eK't£A.eCJ'tlKE<; CJUµcpcov{sc; 1101.&U8entCJetc;, emtp&1tS'tat <mTV Kufj&pVT)CJT) -r:rov HVOlJ.lSVOlV Iloltte\COV va omt11psi Kat va. Uttoupyd nc; cnpa.nconlCt(; Kat f3orl9rtnKt(; EuKoliec; £Vt6c; tOlV s-yKata.cnaawv trov EllT)vuccbv Ev01tA.rov Auvaµscov 61tcoc; 1tpO<J61.0p~ OV'tal Ka.tro'ttpco: (i) A6po7tOplKT) B<l<.J'll Aapwac; (.ii).,.-_ Bam}-Asp01topiac; l}tpatou I.t6'.J)avoPUCEiou (Aspo6p6µl0'• ,,,.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evzones: the Historic Presidential Guard of Greece
    30 FRIDAY 15 JANUARY 2010 NEWS IN ENGLISH Ï Êüóìïò Evzones: The historic Presidential Guard of Greece The Evzones (Presidential In 1926 a panhellenic Guard) have a history that competition was an- nounced for a design stretches over more than a centu- for a Tomb of the Un- ry. The Presidential Guard was known Soldier. It was to founded on 12 December 1868 be built in front of the as a combatant and at the same main entrance of the Parliament building, time ceremonial force. Gradually facing Syntagma (Con- its role became solely ceremonial, stitution) Square. as can be seen by its changing names: the Palace Guard, the On 9 October 1926 the Ministry for the Flag Guard, the Guard of the Military with ordinance Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, number 219188 award- the Royal Guard and finally, ed the prize to the ar- since 1974 and the restoration of chitect Emmanuel Lazaridis. However the decision to erect democracy in Greece, the the tomb in the afore-mentioned place Presidential Guard. was delayed as it met with many objec- tions and differing opinions. A new com- he barracks where the Presiden- mittee was formed in June of 1928 and tial Guard is based has been in the Cabinet accepted its proposals. In Tthe same place since the force April 1929 work began and the monu- was founded. It is situated close to the ment was completed on March of 1932. present Presidential Man- Its inauguration took place at the time of sion (formerly the Palace) the National Holiday of the same year.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Addicts in the Hellenic Armed Forces. a Ground-Breaking Study by Professor Demetrios Kouretas in 1930
    WWW.HSJ.GR – HEALTH SCIENCE JOURNAL ® VOLUME 3, ISSUE 4 (2009) Drug Addicts in the hellenic armed forces. A ground-breaking study by Professor Demetrios Kouretas in 1930. Lazaros Vladimiros 1, Aristidis Diamantis 1,2, Apostolos Beloukas 2, Emmanouil Magiorkinis 1,2. 1. Department of History of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Athens University 2. Office for the Study of History of Hellenic Naval Medicine, Naval Hospital of Athens, Greece Abstract The aim of this study was to elevate from obscurity the results of Demetrios Kouretas’ research on the drug addicts in the Hellenic Armed forces during the mid-war period. Demetrios Kouretas, gifted with exceptional discernment, undertook a pioneering study regarding the use of addictive substances in the Greek Armed forces. Kouretas did not stick to the epidemiological parameters of the use of narcotics, but also tried to look into the reasons that led to drug addiction and to give an outline of the mental outlook of the drug addicts. Demetrios Kouretas brought forward the problem of drug addiction, which was considered as taboo. His study, based on a strict scientific basis, is considered a byword for the psychiatric research in Greece. Keywords: History, Armed forces, drug addiction, Greece Corresponding author: Emmanouil Magiorkinis, B.Sc., M.D. L. Aianteiou 3- PB 1541 18900, Salamina Greece Tel: +30-210-7486382 Fax: +30-210-7486382 e-mail: [email protected] Introduction knew of the drug since the prehistoric and he history of drug use goes back many Minoan years 3. Opium was a basic centuries. Narcotics were known to component of an ancient greek remedy Tancient people and their civilizations called the “Thiriaki” (Θηριακή) which was not only for religious reasons but also for 1 considered as an exceptional therapeutic medical purposes .
    [Show full text]
  • Volume Xix, Issue 2
    Leadership 100 Chairman, Argyris Vassiliou, third from left, at Ribbon Cutting of Exhibit Hall of 44th Biennial Clergy-Laity Congress, with (L to R) Leadership 100 Founder, Chairman Emeritus and Honorary Chairman of Congress, Arthur C. Anton, Peter Bassett, Co-Chair, Metropolitan Apostolos of Derkoi, Metropolitan Maximos of Selyvria, Host Metropolitan Methodios of Boston, Archbishop Demetrios, and Michael Sophocles, Co-Chair. VOLUME 19 ISSUE 2 – Summer 2018 Editorial Content George Schira Associates, Inc. Metropolitan Nicholas and Metropolitan Savas Graphic Design Adrian Salescu [email protected] Present Christ the True Vine Icon www.NEOgraphix.us Photographer to New Members and Obelisks to Fulfilled Members Dimitrios Panagos [email protected] at 27th Annual Leadership 100 Conference www.panagos.com THE LEADER is published by: in February of 2018. The Archbishop Iakovos Leadership 100® Fund, Inc. Olympic Tower 645 Fifth Avenue Suite 403 CONTENTS New York, NY 10022 Tel: 212.308.2627 Fax: 646.497.1794 web: www.L100.org email: [email protected] © 2002 Leadership 100® 2 MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN “Registered in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office” EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Argyris Vassiliou Chairman Demetrios G. Logothetis 8 LEADERSHIP 100 GRANTS AT WORK Vice Chairman Kassandra L. Romas Secretary Metropolitan Nicholas Presents Icon Thomas G. Jordan to Nick and Panagiota Anagnostopoulos Treasurer John A. Catsimatidis George S. Tsandikos NEW AND FULFILLED MEMBERS Mike A. Manatos Theodore K. Zampetis 25 AND IN MEMORIAM Emanuel J. Cotronakis Legal Counsel Paulette Poulos Executive Director FOUNDERS Arthur C. Anton Andrew A. Athens† 27 NEWS OF OUR MEMBERS Thomas A. Athens† George K. Chimples† Peter M. Dion Michael Jaharis† George P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Defense Industry-Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies Analyses and Forecasts to 2017
    The Greek Defense Industry-Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies Analyses and Forecasts to 2017 www.strategicdefenceintelligence.com [email protected] John Carpenter House, 7 Carmelite Street, LondonEC4Y 0BS, United Kingdom, Tel: +44 (0)20 7936 6830 The Greek Defense Industry-Market Opportunities and Entry Strategies Analyses and Forecasts to 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 What is this Report About? ..........................................................................................................10 1.2 Definitions .....................................................................................................................................10 1.3 Summary Methodology .................................................................................................................12 1.4 SDI Terrorism Index ......................................................................................................................13 1.5 About Strategic Defence Intelligence (www.strategicdefenceintelligence.com) ......................13 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 14 3 Market Attractiveness and Emerging Opportunities ........................................................ 16 3.1 Defense Market Size Historical and Forecast..............................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • To Nmrs at SHAPE
    Greek Military In ordet to become familiar with the Hellenic the Armed Forces, you can have a look to the Command Structure as it is shown on the slide below. Command Structure Gr. Police ΧΧΧΧΧ Coast Guard (2) HNDGS (2) ΧΧΧΧ HAGS-HNGS-HAFGS C.A.A Civil Aviation.Admin (3) (2) Fire Dep. JORRHQ OTHER COMMANDS (1) (3) ΧΧΧΧ ΧΧΧΧ ΧΧΧΧ ΧΧΧ ΧΧΧ 1st ARMY/ FLEET TACTICAL B΄CORPS HMCII OHQs-EU COMMAND AIR FORCE ΧΧΧ COMMAND A΄ CORPS ΧΧΧ LEGEND D΄CORPS (1) Operational Command ΧΧΧ (2) Operational Command war-crisis C΄CORPS/ (3) Administrative Control NDC-GR In specifics: a. At Strategic Level, Operational Command is laid with the CHOD, supported by the General staffs of the three Services b. At Operational Level there are “7” major HQs and the NDC-GR which is assigned to NATO as FLR HQ. c. In addition there is Joint HQ for Rapid Response operations at Tactical Level. d. In case of open hostilities the CHOD assumes Operational Command, of Police, Coast Guard, Border Police and the Fire Department Furthermore, The Strategic Military Objectives and the Main Operational Tasks, as defined by the National Defence Strategy, can be summarized as: a. Firstly, maintaining and further developing our ability to deter and should deterrence fails to defend against any kind of external threat, preserving the national sovereignty and territorial integrity. b. Secondly, to promote regional and global Security & Stability, contributing to Crisis Management and to defence against asymmetric threats, enhancing military cooperation, maintaining regional presence, participating to international peace support operations and contributing to the development and implementation of confidence building measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenic Armed Forces Greece Has Embarked Since 2019 in an Effort to Revamp Its Armed Forces Addressing Needs That Have Remaine
    Hellenic Armed Forces Greece has embarked since 2019 in an effort to revamp its armed forces addressing needs that have remained unattended for years. The first move that Athens made was the procurement of 18 Rafale fighters (12 used and 6 new) that will be delivered starting in mid-2021. Along with this it became obvious that the ships of the Hellenic Navy were showing their age, and new ships (frigates) were needed while a mid-life upgrade for the MEKO 200 frigates was also desperately needed. This is obviously the costliest of the programs being contemplated by the Hellenic Armed Forces. So far the suitors for the new frigates are: France with the digital frigates "Belh @ ra", the USA with the MMSC, Germany with four new A-200 frigates or two plus two A-200 and A-300, Dutch with the "Karel Doorman" (s.s. probably as the intermediate solution) and a possible new Onega class ships, Italy with the FREMM, and Spain with the F-110 Navantia. Germans offer for additional two type 214 submarines. Greece already has 4 type 214 submarines This in turn again brings forth the need to speed up the processes for the selection and acquisition of heavy torpedoes for the Type 214 submarines. The Navy sees this as a top pririty while the willingness to procure torpedoes is reiterated as often as possible. Both the Air Force and the Navy are looking for sub-strategic weapons to equip the new and upgraded aircraft and the new frigates. Army programs Although the interest is concentrated in the programs of the Air Force (PA) and the Navy (PN) with a focus on the acquisition of the 18 Rafale F3R as well as the four frigates, the Greek Army (ES) is also making efforts to launch armament programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenic Army's Preparation for the Balkan Wars
    Hellenic Army’s preparation for the Balkan Wars; applying the joint warfare concept Dr Efpraxia S. Paschalidou The First Balkan War Two Balkan Wars took place in 1912 through 1913, the first involving an alliance of Christian states, namely Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and Montenegro, against the Ottoman Empire. The goal of the allies was the liberation of their still enslaved Christian compatriots. The Second Balkan War involved Greece and Serbia against Bulgaria, and was the result of the latter's aggressive attitude and territorial claims against its former allies 1. The grievous outcome of the Greco-Ottoman War of 1897 followed by the Struggle for Macedonia (1904-1908) and the tensions stirred up in all matters of national importance, proved the absolute necessity for a radical transformation in Greece. A fundamental renewal of the national web and a structural change of the political scene were caused in August 1909 by the Military League, a group of junior officers claiming a revolutionary solution to the chronic problems of the state, the society and the army. Systematic efforts were introduced to reform and equip the military forces 2. The Balkan Wars constitute the first joint operation of the three branches of the Armed Forces with the rudimentary even though substantial participation of the Hellenic Air Force for the first time. The combination of the potential and the operational jointness of all the forces resulted to the achievement of the best outcome namely the liberation of the territories still under occupation and the doubling of the Hellenic territory 3. By the beginning of autumn 1912, the four Christian Balkan states, although they had not signed a common defence pact, were in solidarity and of united purpose against the Ottoman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16, Issue 1 2014
    Baltic Security and Defence Review ________________________________________________________ Volume 16, Issue 1 2014 Baltic Security and Defence Review is the bi-annual publication of the Baltic Defence College © 2014, Baltic Defence College, All rights reserved ISSN 1736-3772 (print) 1736-3780 (online) Editorial Board Editor: Dr. James S. Corum, Dean, Baltic Defence College Deputy editor Mr. James Rogers, Baltic Defence College Harold E. Raugh, Jr., Ph.D. Command Historian, V Corps Lt. Col. John Andreas Olsen PhD, Norwegian Air Force, Dean, Norwegian Defence University College Dr. Augustine Meaher, Department of Political and Strategic Studies, Baltic Defence College Dr. Hannu Kari, Finnish National Defence University Dr. Maja Ericksson, Swedish National Defence Academy Erik Mannik, International Centre for Defence Studies Dr. Olaf Mertelsmann, Tartu University Dr. Margarita Seselgyte, Vilnius University Lithuania Dr. Zaneta Ozolina, University of Latvia Layout: Oliver Toots Cover and print: www.ecoprint.ee Electronic version of the Baltic Security and Defence Review can be accessed on the website of the Baltic Defence College at www.baltdefcol.org All articles of the Baltic Security and Defence Review are also available through the International Relations and Security Network (ISN) at www.isn.ethz.ch All inquiries should be made to the Baltic Defence College, Riia 12, 51013 Tartu, Estonia, ph: +372 717 6000, e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer: The Baltic Defence College publishes the Baltic Security and Defence Review as a journal
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenic Defence Industries Catalogue Catalogue Tries
    HELLENIC MINISTRY OF NATIONAL DEFENCE 2021 HELLENICHELLL ENIC DEFENCEDEFENCE INDUSTRIESINDUSTTRIES CATALOGUEC GENERAL DIRECTORATE FOR DEFENCE INVESTMENTS & ARMAMENTS CREATION - PRINTING: HELLENIC ARMY'S PRINTING OFFICE All rights reserved. No part of this publication, or related recorded material, may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical or print, including photocopies, or any other means, without prior HELLENIC written consent of the Hellenic MoD. While every effort is taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained herein, it should be noted that the information was mainly based on data submitted by the companies under their responsibility. DEFENCE Publication date: 2021 Previous editions: 2000, 2002, 2006, 2008, 2016, 2018, 2019, 2020. Published under the Authority of: The Hellenic Ministry of National Defence (HMoD), INDUSTRIES General Directorate for Defence Investments and Armaments (GDDIA) with cooperation of the Hellenic Aerospace & Defence Industries Group (HASDIG) and the Association of Hellenic Manufacturers of Defence Material Association (SEKPY). GDDIA Contact Details: CATALOGUE Tel.: +30 210 7466445 Fax: +30 210 7466544 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.gdaee.mil.gr Address: Fakinos Camp, 5-7 Panagioti Kanellopoulou Avenue, 11527 Athens, Greece 2021 Introduction 3 Editorial 5 HASDIG Presentation 7 SEKPY Presentation 9 Sector of Activity, Capability, Level 10-11 Index of Companies by Sector of Activity 12-19 Hellenic Defence Industries 22-181 Index
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Security and Defence Review 2014
    Baltic Security and Defence Review ________________________________________________________ Volume 16, Issue 1 2014 Baltic Security and Defence Review is the bi-annual publication of the Baltic Defence College © 2014, Baltic Defence College, All rights reserved ISSN 1736-3772 (print) 1736-3780 (online) Editorial Board Editor: Dr. James S. Corum, Dean, Baltic Defence College Deputy editor Mr. James Rogers, Baltic Defence College Harold E. Raugh, Jr., Ph.D. Command Historian, V Corps Lt. Col. John Andreas Olsen PhD, Norwegian Air Force, Dean, Norwegian Defence University College Dr. Augustine Meaher, Department of Political and Strategic Studies, Baltic Defence College Dr. Hannu Kari, Finnish National Defence University Dr. Maja Ericksson, Swedish National Defence Academy Erik Mannik, International Centre for Defence Studies Dr. Olaf Mertelsmann, Tartu University Dr. Margarita Seselgyte, Vilnius University Lithuania Dr. Zaneta Ozolina, University of Latvia Layout: Oliver Toots Cover and print: www.ecoprint.ee Electronic version of the Baltic Security and Defence Review can be accessed on the website of the Baltic Defence College at www.baltdefcol.org All articles of the Baltic Security and Defence Review are also available through the International Relations and Security Network (ISN) at www.isn.ethz.ch All inquiries should be made to the Baltic Defence College, Riia 12, 51013 Tartu, Estonia, ph: +372 717 6000, e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer: The Baltic Defence College publishes the Baltic Security and Defence Review as a journal
    [Show full text]
  • Disparities Among Greek Army Units Due to Physical Training Instructor's
    Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 2014, 7, (Suppl-1, M11) 65-72 65 Open Access Disparities among Greek Army Units due to Physical Training Instructor’s Competency Influencing the Organizational Efficiency of the Army Physical Training Vasiliki Kontodimaki1,* and Costas Mountakis2 1Hellenic Military Academy, Varis - Koropiou av. 16673, Attiki, Greece 2University of Peloponnese Department of Sport Management, Orthias Artemidos & Plateon str. 231 00, Sparta, Greece Abstract: There has been no systematic measurement of the parameters affecting the organization’s efficiency of the physical training of the Hellenic Army’s Physical Training (APT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the competency of the five different types of “Physical Training (PT) Instructor” within the Hellenic Army Units Training Cycles (HAUTCs), which influences the APT program’s organizational efficiency in the Hellenic Armed (HA) forces. Two thousands eight hundred sixty four (2864) survey questionnaires (5 point Likert type scale) were selected. Participants came from a wide spectrum of Greek Permanent Army Personnel in HA. Five (5) different types of the PT Instructors were tested, measured along three (3) dimensions (a) contribution to implementation, (b) frequency of implementation and (c) effectiveness/adequacy of implementation, which evaluate their competency in performance of APT programs (15 dependent variables). ΑΝΟVA and Bonferroni post comparisons were calculated for the total of the dependent variables among the three HAUTCs (A΄, Β΄ and C΄) (3 independent variables). The probability of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. The results showed that the “Officer” (OFC) contributes, applies and suffices the APT programs mainly in HAUTCs A΄ and B΄, whereas “Permanent Commissioned Officer” (PCOF) applies APT programs more often in HAUTC C΄.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic and Operational Innovations at the Hellenic Armed Forces, As Parameter of the Balkan Wars, 1912-1913
    Strategic and operational innovations at the Hellenic Armed Forces, as parameter of the Balkan Wars, 1912-1913 Dr Efpraxia S. Paschalidou The Balkan Wars took place in 1912 through 1913; the first involving an alliance of Christian states, namely Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria and Montenegro against the Ottoman Empire so as to liberate their still enslaved Christian compatriots, and the second one involving Greece and Serbia against Bulgaria. Establishment of the Joint General Staff In Greece, the military coup of 1909, contributed towards the victories won in the Balkan Wars, because it gave a new and proper impulse to reform the Armed Forces and implement new and well thought-out armament programs. The political and military leadership, foreseeing the upcoming changes in the Balkans and in order to put Greece in a position to liberate the occupied territories undertook coordinated action for the country’s complete preparation. The collaboration of the land and naval forces constituted the fundamental precondition for achieving Greece’s national objectives 1. The Higher Joint Staff of the Land Army and Navy 2 was formed on 17 April 1910. Its task was the drafting of a common plan of operations for the army and the navy, the research in the required military and naval organization and preparations, as well as the ensuring for the complete implementation of that plan, at a given time. Also the gradual reinforcement of the country’s ground defence with the proper defensive works and transportation means, the gradual substitution, repair and selling off the outdated ships and every sort of useless war material whether being for use on land, or sea, the country’s dowry with a complete naval base, perfect industrial factories for manufacturing weapons and gun powder and in general the 1 Efpraxia S.
    [Show full text]