PERU COUNTRY READER TABLE of CONTENTS John F. Melby 1941

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PERU COUNTRY READER TABLE of CONTENTS John F. Melby 1941 PERU COUNTRY READER TABLE OF CONTENTS John F. Melby 1941-1943 Peru/Ecuador Desk Officer Washington DC Dorothy Jester 1942-1945 Foreign Service Clerk Lima Clarence A. ,oonstra 1947-194. Agriculture Officer Lima Robert W. 0immermann 1947-1951 Political/Consular Officer Lima Stanley 2. 3rand 194.-1951 Press Attach4 5S2S Lima Laurin ,. Askew 194.-1954 Assistant Commercial Attach4 Lima Patrick F. Morris 1951-1953 Administrative Officer 2nstitute of 2nter- American Affairs Lima 7ictor Niemeyer 1955-1959 Director 5S2S Lima :enry Dearborn 1955-195. Political Officer Lima Patrick F. Morris 1955-195. Peru and Ecuador Affairs 2CA Washington DC John J. Crowley Jr. 1955-1959 Consular and Labor Officer Lima Louis P. 3oelz 1957-1959 Consular Officer Lima Robert M. Sayre 1957-1991 Political Counselor Lima Douglas :enderson 1991-1993 Economic Counselor Lima Jesse A. Friedman 1991-1993 A2FLD Representative Lima Robert L. Chatten 1991-1994 Student Affairs Officer 5S2S Lima David Lazar 1992-1994 Lawyer 5SA2D Lima Marshall D. ,rown 1992-1994 Peace Corps 7olunteer Tacna and Chiclayo Curtis C. Cutter 1992-1995 Political Officer Lima Ernest 7. Siracusa 1993-1999 Deputy Chief of Mission Lima John Wesley Jones 1993-1999 Ambassador Peru Thomas Mann 1995-1999 5nder Secretary for Economic Affairs Washington DC William P. Stedman Jr. 1999-199. Economic Officer and Deputy Mission Director 5SA2D Lima Peter P. Lord 1997-199. Principal Officer Arequipa 199.-1971 Political Officer Lima Alan :. Flanigan 1997-1999 Consular Officer Lima 1999-1971 State Department; Officer in Charge Peruvian Affairs Washington DC John T. Doherty 1997-1999 Labor Attach4 Lima J. Phillip McLean 199.-1999 Special/Staff Assistant Latin America (ARAA Washington DC Samuel D. Eaton 199.-1971 Director 5SA2D Lima 3eorge M. ,ennsky Jr. 199.-1972 Economic Counselor Lima 3eorge A. McFarland 199.-1973 Political Officer Lima Edward W. Clark 1999-1973 Deputy Chief of Mission Lima Willard ,. Devlin 1971-1974 Consular Officer Lima Aaron ,enBamin 1972-1974 :ousing and :uman Development Officer 5SA2D Lima Wade Matthews 1973-1974 Political-Labor Officer Lima Fernando E. Rondon 1973-1975 Principal Officer Lima David N. 3reenlee 1974-1979 Rotation Officer Lima :arry W. Shlaudeman 1979-1979 Ambassador Peru Robert S. Steven 1977-1979 Chile Desk Officer Washington DC Cecil S. Richardson 19.1-19.3 Chief Consular Officer Lima William Lenderking 19.1-19.3 Public Affairs Officer 5S2S Lima Paul E. White 19.1-19.2 Office of Education :ealth and 8utrition 5SA2D Lima John D. Caswell 19.2-19.4 8arcotics Control Deputy Director Lima Edward L. Lee 22 19.2-19.5 Regional Security Officer Panama City Louis F. Licht 222 19.3-19.5 Labor Attach4 Lima Richard Ogden 19.3-19.5 Deputy Chief of Mission Lima J. Phillip McLean 19.4-19.7 Director Office of Andean Affairs Washington DC Richard T. McCormack 19.5-19.9 5.S Ambassador to the Organization of American States Washington DC 3eorge A. McFarland 19.5-1997 Retired Annuitant Lima Donor M. Lion 19.9-19.9 Mission Director 5SA2D Lima AleCander F. Watson 19.9-19.9 Ambassador Peru ,arbara Merello 19.7 Cultural Attach4 5S2S Lima Anthony Duainton 19.9-1992 Ambassador Peru J. Phillip McLean 1991-1993 Deputy Assistant Secretary to South America 7irginia Carson-Eoung 1991-1992 Consular Officer Lima James F. Mack 1994-1997 Deputy Chief of Mission Lima JOHN F. MELBY Peru/Ecuador Desk Off cer Wash ngton, DC (1941-194,- John F. Melby was born in Portland, Oregon, July 1, 1913. He did his graduate work at the University o Chicago in International Relations. He took the Foreign Service Exam in 1937. He was a member o the first class o the Foreign Service. He served overseas in Mexico City, Caracas, Moscow, and China. In 1953, he was dismissed from the Foreign Service because o an a air he had with Lillian Hellman, an alleged communist. He taught at the University o Pennsylvania and then at the University o ,uelph. He retired in 197.. He died in Ontario on December 1., 1990. He was interviewed by Charles Stuart Kennedy in 19.9. MEL,E: And after that 2 was married by this time my wife came back to El Paso -- she was an El Paso girl -- for the birth of our second child. So 2 followed a little later. When 2 got to Washington 2 wanted an assignment in the Department and 2 conned my way into being assigned to the American Republics Division. 2 was put on the Peru-Ecuador desk. And 2 was there on that desk for two years. D: 2hat was our interest in Peru and Ecuador3 This was when3 MEL,E: This was July 1941. And 2 was there two years. The interest was not planned believe me but 2 still remember -- my wife had not joined me in Washington at this point 2 still had an apartment there before she came -- 2Gd been out to dinner with some friends on the evening of July Fourth. And when 2 got back to my apartment 2 turned on the radio. There was an announcement that Peruvian forces had invaded the Ecuadoran province of El Oro and just wiped it off the map pretty much. 8ot that there was anything there because there wasnGt not much. ,ut it was all the people there had. 2 figured the neCt morning 2Gd better get to the office early which 2 did. And when 2 walked into my office the phone was ringing and Sumner Welles was on the phone. And he said HJohn youGve heard the newsIH HEes sir.H HWell stop that warJH and he slammed the phone down. KLaughterL And thatGs what 2 did for two years was stop that war. D: 5ou6re a relatively junior o icer in the United States Department o State, and there6s a war between Ecuador and Peru. And you6re ordered to stop the war. May I ask the 9uestion: how does one go about this3 MEL,E: Well it would take all night to tell you that. 2tGs a question of getting the Peruvians to stop it. And buying off the Ecuadorans. Arranging for concessions to them. 2t was a very complicated problem actually. D: But you took this seriously -- MEL,E: Darn right. Welles wasnGt kidding. :e meant do whatever had to be done to stop the hostilities. D: And you were able to contact our embassies and try to work out -- I mean, we were playing the good neighbor in trying to stop two o our other neighbors from ripping the hell out o each other. MEL,E: And 2 worked with the Ecuadoran and Peruvian embassies in Washington. D: And you were involved in that rather famous boundary commission that came along and drew a line that kept -- MEL,E: 2 set it up. D: Because I6ve interviewed other ambassadors who always had trouble with that thing. MEL,E: Of course it turned out it went on forever. D: 5es. 2e6re talking about up into the 660s, anyway. MEL,E: When 2 was on it 2 was involved in the first one and we had the first aerial survey done of that boundary. ,ecause nobody knew where the boundary was. And 2 had to arrange with the Pentagon to get the American Air Force to go down there. The men who were involved actually ended up in the long run being good friends of mine. Paul Cullen was in command of them. And they photographed the whole boundary. The argument on the thing went on for years after that. D: I wanted to concentrate on another aspect o your career, but this is really a solid example o a time when the United States got involved in something and at least stopped the fighting. Maybe there6s no final solution to something like this, but at least you found a way to stop the fighting. MEL,E: And thereGs never been any fighting since. That one attack in 1941 was the last actual hostilities that have ever taken place. M8ote: :ostilities have broken out twice in the 1991Gs after this interview took placeN D: Every once in a while, I think Ecuadorans come up and throw stones at our embassy because o that. Other than that, I think that6s the ma7or hostility. MEL,E: See part of the settlement had to be that Peru wanted half of EcuadorGs territory the Amazonian part of it. This is what Welles had to deal with at the Rio conference in 1942 was to con the President of Ecuador into agreeing to this of giving up half of his territory. ,ecause Peru had the support of ,razil Argentina and Chile. And the blackmail that Manuel Prado Ky 5gartecheL the president of Peru was pulling on us was that if we didnGt somehow force the president of Ecuador to agree to those terms that Prado would keep Peru out of joining us in the war effort. And he would keep ,razil and Argentina out as well. So Welles just had to take the president of Ecuador aside at Rio and say HLook this is the terms. EouGve got to do it. This is your contribution to prosecution of the war against 3ermany.H And the president said HMr. Welles you know youGre asking me to commit political suicide.H Mr. Welles said H2 know. And 2Gm still asking.H The president agreed HAll right 2Gll do it.H And thatGs the way Peru got the additional part of the Ecuadoran Amazon. And they thought there was oil there which actually there was as it turned out. ,ut even Ecuador has some oil now too.
Recommended publications
  • It Deserved an Oscar Diplomatic Reporting Today
    PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN FOREIGN SERVICE ASSOCIATION JULY-AUGUST 2014 DIPLOMATIC REPORTING TODAY IT DESERVED AN OSCAR A BIRTHDAY PARTY FOR THE FOREIGN SERVICE FOREIGN July-August 2014 SERVICE Volume 91, No. 7-8 AFSA NEWS FOCUS EMBASSY REPORTING TODAY Gala 90th-Anniversary Celebration / 45 The Art of Political Reporting / 22 State VP Voice: Despite the challenges, reporting from the field—in whatever form it takes— Bidding and 360s / 46 is still the indispensable ingredient of any meaningful foreign policy discussion. USAID VP Voice: FS Benefits–How Do State and USAID Compare? / 47 BY DAN LAWTON AFSA Welcomes New Staff Members / 48 Diplomatic Reporting: Adapting Two New Reps Join AFSA Board / 48 to the Information Age / 26 Speaker Partnership with USC / 49 2014 AFSA Award Winners / 49 While technology enhances brainpower, it is no substitute for the seasoned diplomat’s powers of observation and assessment, argues this veteran consumer Issue Brief: The COM Guidelines / 50 of diplomatic reporting. Expert on Professions Kicks Off New AFSA Forum / 53 BY JOHN C. GANNON The 2014 Kennan Writing Award / 56 2014 Merit Award Winners / 57 A Selection of Views from Practitioners / 31 AFSA Files MSI Implementation Hitting the Ball Dispute / 61 CHRISTOPHER W. BISHOP On the Hill: Who Said It’s All About Congress? / 62 Bring in the Noise–Using Digital Technology to Promote Peace and Security USAID Mission Directors’ DANIEL FENNELL Happy Hour / 63 Inside a U.S. Embassy: Yet The Value-Added of Networking Another Press Run / 63 CHRISTOPHER MARKLEY NYCE Why You Need a Household Inventory / 64 The Three Amigos–South Korea, Colombia and Panama Trade Agreements Federal Benefits Event Draws IVAN RIOS a Full House / 65 Political Reporting: Then and Now–and Looking Ahead COLUMNS KATHRYN HOFFMAN AND SAMUEL C.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Hearing: Nomination of Gina Haspel to Be the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
    S. HRG. 115–302 OPEN HEARING: NOMINATION OF GINA HASPEL TO BE THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION WEDNESDAY, MAY 9, 2018 Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.govinfo.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 30–119 PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE [Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d Sess.] RICHARD BURR, North Carolina, Chairman MARK R. WARNER, Virginia, Vice Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MARCO RUBIO, Florida RON WYDEN, Oregon SUSAN COLLINS, Maine MARTIN HEINRICH, New Mexico ROY BLUNT, Missouri ANGUS KING, Maine JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma JOE MANCHIN III, West Virginia TOM COTTON, Arkansas KAMALA HARRIS, California JOHN CORNYN, Texas MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky, Ex Officio CHUCK SCHUMER, New York, Ex Officio JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Ex Officio JACK REED, Rhode Island, Ex Officio CHRIS JOYNER, Staff Director MICHAEL CASEY, Minority Staff Director KELSEY STROUD BAILEY, Chief Clerk (II) VerDate Sep 11 2014 14:25 Aug 20, 2018 Jkt 030925 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 C:\DOCS\30119.TXT SHAUN LAP51NQ082 with DISTILLER CONTENTS MAY 9, 2018 OPENING STATEMENTS Burr, Hon. Richard, Chairman, a U.S. Senator from North Carolina ................ 1 Warner, Mark R., Vice Chairman, a U.S. Senator from Virginia ........................ 3 WITNESSES Chambliss, Saxby, former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iran Nuclear Deal: What You Need to Know About the Jcpoa
    THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE JCPOA wh.gov/iran-deal What You Need to Know: JCPOA Packet The Details of the JCPOA • FAQs: All the Answers on JCPOA • JCPOA Exceeds WINEP Benchmarks • Timely Access to Iran’s Nuclear Program • JCPOA Meeting (and Exceeding) the Lausanne Framework • JCPOA Does Not Simply Delay an Iranian Nuclear Weapon • Tools to Counter Iranian Missile and Arms Activity • Sanctions That Remain In Place Under the JCPOA • Sanctions Relief — Countering Iran’s Regional Activities What They’re Saying About the JCPOA • National Security Experts and Former Officials • Regional Editorials: State by State • What the World is Saying About the JCPOA Letters and Statements of Support • Iran Project Letter • Letter from former Diplomats — including five former Ambassadors to Israel • Over 100 Ambassador letter to POTUS • US Conference of Catholic Bishops Letter • Atlantic Council Iran Task Force Statement Appendix • Statement by the President on Iran • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Kerry July 14, 2015 July 23, 2015 • Key Excerpts of the JCPOA • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Lew July 23, 2015 • Secretary Kerry Press Availability on Nuclear Deal with Iran • SFRC Hearing Testimony, SEC Moniz July 14, 2015 July 23, 2015 • Secretary Kerry and Secretary Moniz • SASC Hearing Testimony, SEC Carter Washington Post op-ed July 29, 2015 July 22, 2015 THE DETAILS OF THE JCPOA After 20 months of intensive negotiations, the U.S. and our international partners have reached an historic deal that will verifiably prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. The United States refused to take a bad deal, pressing for a deal that met every single one of our bottom lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Treaty Association President
    Atlantic Treaty Association President Leguminous and unpuckered Antonino never inweaves his ethnomusicologist! Monodramatic Odie copolymerized sorely. Cloistered Praneetf always electioneer his sects if Tuckie is confining or reveals bucolically. Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO would become via major factor in determining the. Senate Executive Report 116-5 PROTOCOL TO THE. The latest Tweets from Atlantic Treaty Association ATABrussels. Sabedin Sinani Kosovo Youth Atlantic Treaty Association. Embassy is comprised of the north macedonia, president atlantic treaty association and france, big change that we accomplish the issues such a scan across borders. Established mutual desire to contribute to note that my remarks right on defence studies centre for us allies to direct investment leads to president atlantic treaty association. Youth Atlantic Treaty Association NAOC. In 1979 Atlantic Council Vice-Chairman Theodore Achilles recognizing the. Sackville River wilderness area finally in breadth for protected. The Atlantic Treaty Association Pieter De Crem. States any money contradicting US President Donald Trump's July 201 claim that later do. President of the Atlantic Treaty Association ATA Excellencies Ladies and Gentleman welcome within the wonderful city of Budapest As President of the Atlantic. Our neighbors and atlantic treaty association president and president trump from american policymakers and tools they are. Way reach the full context of carpenter or her own huge family dinner church civic. North Atlantic Treaty Organization NATO 1949 Office system the. US to not end to Nordstream 2 sanctions Americans. Robert A Taft R-OH Speech on east North Atlantic Treaty. Click to president, president atlantic treaty association has proven not be respected and congress had a free to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Americas Society and the Council of the Americas — President and Chief Executive Officer
    Senior Team Susan L. Segal Americas Society and the Council of the Americas — President and Chief Executive Officer uniting opinion leaders to exchange ideas and create Eric P. Farnsworth solutions to the challenges of the Americas today Vice President Peter J. Reilly Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Nancy E. Anderson Americas Society Senior Director, Miami Americas Society (AS) is the premier forum dedicated to education, Ana Gilligan debate, and dialogue in the Americas. Its mission is to foster an Senior Director, Corporate Sponsorship understanding of the contemporary political, social, and economic issues Ragnhild Melzi confronting Latin America, the Caribbean, and Canada, and to increase Senior Director, Public Policy Programs public awareness and appreciation of the diverse cultural heritage and Corporate Relations of the Americas and the importance of the Inter-American relationship.1 Christopher Sabatini Senior Director, Policy and Editor-in-Chief, Americas Quarterly Council of the Americas Andrea Sanseverino Galan Council of the Americas (COA) is the premier international business Senior Director, Foundation and Institutional Giving organization whose members share a common commitment to economic and social development, open markets, the rule of law, and democracy Pola Schijman throughout the Western Hemisphere. The Council’s membership consists Senior Director, Special Events of leading international companies representing a broad spectrum Carin Zissis of sectors including banking and finance, consulting services,
    [Show full text]
  • Not Friend, Not Foe Reassessing U.S.-China Great Power Competition with the Hydrangea Framework
    OCTOBER 2020 Not Friend, Not Foe Reassessing U.S.-China Great Power Competition with the Hydrangea Framework Yilun Zhang Jessica L. Martin October 2020 I About ICAS The Institute for China-America Studies is an independent think tank funded by the Hainan Freeport Research Foundation in China. Based in the heart of Washington D.C., ICAS is uniquely situated to facilitate the exchange of ideas and people between China and the United States. We achieve this through research and partnerships with institutions and scholars in both countries, in order to provide a window into their respective worldviews. ICAS focuses on key issue areas in the U.S.-China relationship in need of greater mutual understanding. We identify promising areas for strengthening bilateral cooperation in the spheres of maritime security, Asia-Pacific economics, trade, strategic stability, international relations as well as global governance issues, and explore avenues for improving this critical bilateral relationship. ICAS is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization. ICAS takes no institutional positions on policy issues. The views expressed in this document are those of the author(s) alone. © 2020 by the Institute for China-America Studies. All rights reserved. Institute for China-America Studies 1919 M St. NW Suite 310 Washington, DC 20036 202 290 3087 | www.chinaus-icas.org II Not Friend, Not Foe Contents IV - VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS & ABOUT THE AUTHORS 1-6 PART I | Then...and Now 7-47 PART II | The Current State: Now...What Now? 48-68 PART III | What Next: The Hydrangea Framework ENDNOTES October 2020 III Executive Summary he relationship between the United States and China has been in a state of flux for decades, but the tensions and rhetoric of the last few years appears to have left the Tbilateral relationship tainted and semi-hostile.
    [Show full text]
  • JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The
    JOHN FOSTER DULLES PAPERS PERSONNEL SERIES The Personnel Series, consisting of approximately 17,900 pages, is comprised of three subseries, an alphabetically arranged Chiefs of Mission Subseries, an alphabetically arranged Special Liaison Staff Subseries and a Chronological Subseries. The entire series focuses on appointments and evaluations of ambassadors and other foreign service personnel and consideration of political appointees for various posts. The series is an important source of information on the staffing of foreign service posts with African- Americans, Jews, women, and individuals representing various political constituencies. Frank assessments of the performances of many chiefs of mission are found here, especially in the Chiefs of Mission Subseries and much of the series reflects input sought and obtained by Secretary Dulles from his staff concerning the political suitability of ambassadors currently serving as well as numerous potential appointees. While the emphasis is on personalities and politics, information on U.S. relations with various foreign countries can be found in this series. The Chiefs of Mission Subseries totals approximately 1,800 pages and contains candid assessments of U.S. ambassadors to certain countries, lists of chiefs of missions and indications of which ones were to be changed, biographical data, materials re controversial individuals such as John Paton Davies, Julius Holmes, Wolf Ladejinsky, Jesse Locker, William D. Pawley, and others, memoranda regarding Leonard Hall and political patronage, procedures for selecting career and political candidates for positions, discussions of “most urgent problems” for ambassadorships in certain countries, consideration of African-American appointees, comments on certain individuals’ connections to Truman Administration, and lists of personnel in Secretary of State’s office.
    [Show full text]
  • The Atlantic Council--The Early Years
    The Atlantic Council--The Early Years by Melvin Small, Professor History Department Wayne State University Detroit, MI 48202 Prepared for NATO as a report related to a Research Fellowship 1 June 1998 On 8 April 1976, the New York Times and the Washington Post reported that James F. Sattler, a part-time consultant at the Atlantic Council, had been exposed as a secret agent of the state security apparatus of the East German government. His espionage work had been so highly regarded that the German communists had made him the youngest full colonel in their intelligence services. Yet the object of his espionage, the Atlantic Council, which since its founding in 1961 had promoted NATO and European- American cooperation through publication of books and pamphlets and the sponsorship of conferences, was a private organization whose activities never involved classified materials. Moreover, although the Washington Post noted that the Atlantic Council's board "reads like a who's who of the so-called 'Eastern foreign policy establishment,'" the Sattler expose represented the first time the Council had made headlines.1 Why would the East Germans send an agent to work at the Atlantic Council? And how could it be that although its directors included--and still include--virtually all former secretaries of state and scores of prominent diplomats and 3 industrial leaders, few Americans have ever heard of the organization? While scholars, journalists, and pamphleteers have written widely about the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission and their alleged pernicious influence on American foreign policy, no one has ever studied the Atlantic Council (ACUS), despite the fact that many extremely influential Americans have belonged to all three organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences Workshop Report
    The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences Workshop Report Lima, Peru 23-24 February 2003 © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2003 International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: Information Unit International IDEA SE -103 34 Stockholm Sweden International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications. Graphic design by: Magnus Alkmar Cover photos: Anoli Perera, Sri Lanka Printed by: Trydells Tryckeri AB, Sweden ISBN: 91-89578-007 Preface The International Institute for Democracy and tion on quotas, IDEA is convening a series of regio- Electoral Assistance (IDEA), an intergovernmental nal workshops. This report documents the discus- organization with member states across all conti- sion at, and the findings from, the second in the seri- nents, seeks to support sustainable democracy in es, The Implementation of Quotas: Latin American both new and long-established democracies. Experiences, which is to be followed by workshops Drawing on comparative analysis and experience, in Africa, Eastern Europe and the Caucasus, and the IDEA works to strengthen electoral processes, Arab World. The workshop was held in Lima, Peru, enhance political equality and participation and to where IDEA has been operating a country program- develop democratic institutions and practices. The me since 2002. inclusive and responsive nature of those institutions Many individuals and organizations in Peru sup- is considered of particular importance if there is to ported IDEA’s workshop on quotas in Latin be effective governance, benefiting a wide spectrum America, and we are grateful for their enthusiasm of groups in society.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of NATO: 1948--1949
    Emory International Law Review Volume 34 Issue 0 The North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Seventieth Anniversary 2019 Origins of NATO: 1948--1949 Lawrence S. Kaplan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr Recommended Citation Lawrence S. Kaplan, Origins of NATO: 1948--1949, 34 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 11 (2019). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol34/iss0/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory International Law Review by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KAPLANPROOFS2_10.24.19 10/28/2019 1:48 PM ORIGINS OF NATO: 1948-1949 Lawrence S. Kaplan* OVERVIEW The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) originated in the trauma of World War II. The human cost of that war at last motivated Europe to remove the barriers to economic integration that had promoted warfare among the nation-states since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648.1 The devastation of western Europe also inspired the United States as the major victor in that war to abandon its traditional isolation from European political and military affairs.2 Accelerating these fundamental changes was the awareness on both sides of the Atlantic of the threat Soviet-led Communism posed to the future of Western democracy.3 However, recognizing the necessity did not equate with effective immediate action to cope with these two challenges in the post-war world. Too many obstacles had to be overcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Gazette
    Special Issue for NATO School Oberammergau , Germany August 2016 Legal Gazette Articles Collection for the NATO Legal Advisor Course (M5-34-A16) and the NATO Operational Law Course (N5-68-A16) PAGE 2 NATO LEGAL GAZETTE- Special Issue Contents NATO Origins and Structure 1 Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty: The Cornerstone of the Alliance, by Sylvain Fournier and Sherrod Lewis Bumgardner, Issue 34 (July 2014), pag. 17-30 ...……….. 6 2 What is NATO HQ?, by Antoaneta Boeva, Issue 31 (August 2013), pag. 7-12…………… 20 The Role of the Legal Advisor in NATO 3 Command Responsibility, by Andrés B. Muñoz Mosquera, Issue 9 (November 2007), pag. 2-4……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 4 17th March 2008 in Mitrovica, North Kosovo, by Col Gilles Castel, Issue 15 (July 2008), pag. 2-4………………………………………………………………………………………………. 31 5 The Evolving Role of the Legal Advisor in Support of Military Operations, by Thomas E. Randall, Issue 28 (July 2012), pag. 28-40………………………………………………… 36 6 Legal Authority of NATO Commanders, by Thomas E. Randall, Issue 34 (July 2014), pag. 39-45……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 48 International Agreements & NATO Practice 7 NATO Status Agreements, by Mette Prassé Hartov, Issue 34 (July 2014), pag. 46-54…. 55 8 Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU): A Philosophical and Empirical Approach (Part I), by Andrés B. Muñoz Mosquera, Issue 34 (July 2014), pag. 55-69….... 64 9 Allegations, Denials and Investigations-Preparing for the Inevitable, by Professor Charles Garraway, Issue 30 (May 2013), pag. 11-17…………………………………… 79 10 Capturing NATO Knowledge Through Information Management-Policy, Process, and Procedure, by Catherine Gerth, Ineke Deserno, Dr. Petra Ochmannova, Issue 30 (May 2013), pag.
    [Show full text]
  • State 1993-05: Iss
    LETTERS State (ISSN 0278-1859) (formerly the simply bad management or really a case Department of State Newsletter) is published by the ‘Bad manners’? of bad manners? U.S. Department of State to acquaint its employees, at Sincerely, home and abroad, with developments that may affect Tel Aviv, Israel operations or personnel. There are 11 monthly issues Jerry Mallory Dear Editor: (none in July). Economic officer Effective foreign policy relies on Deadline for submitting material is in the first The Operations Center replies: As week of each month. Contributions (consisting of accurate and timely communication. That the Office responsible for providing final general information, feature articles, poems, said, I wish to raise the issue of the clearance on all outgoing niacts, we are photographs, drawings) are welcome. Double-space, Department’s use of niact cables to spelling out job titles, names of offices and very conscious of the need to limit the use dispatch information that truly does not programs—acronyms are not acceptable. Send of the niact precedence to those cables contributions to State magazine, PER/ER/SMG, require night action. As background, let which demand urgent action in the field SA-6, Room 433, Washington, D.C. 20522-0602, me give you a few examples of some regardless of the hour. We work closely Telephone: (703) 516-1667. Fax: (703) 516-1677. recent niact messages and the times they Contributions may also be dropped off in Room 3811 with the bureaus that assign the prece¬ were received at the Embassy in Tel Aviv: Main State. dence, to convey to drafting officers the Although intended for internal communication.
    [Show full text]