State Studies Complete Lesson Plan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geologic Map of the Tanks Peak Quadrangle, Moffat County, Colorado
6 ~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE TANKS PEAK QUADRANGLE, MOFFAT COUNTY, COLORADO By Wallace R. Hansen and Paul E. Carrara GEOLOGIC QUADRANGLE MAP Published by the U.S. Geological Survey, 1980 G 3!: >"'0 CJ 0 -I GEOLOGIC MAP SYMBOLS COMMONLY USED ON MAPS OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (Special symbols are shown in explanation) Contact-Dashed where approximately Strike ,and dip of beds-Ball indicates located; short dashed where inferred; top 9f beds known from sedimentary dotted where concealed structures ..!!:.... Inclined e Horizontal Contact-Showing dip; well exposed at --+-Vertical Overturned triangle -:f. Strike and dip of foliation Fault-Dashed where approximately located; short dashed where inferred; !L Inclined -+-Vertical +Horizontal dotted where concealed Strike and dip of cleavage 1.20 _ ___..! __....,~, ___ Fault, showing dip-Ball and bar on ....!.1.., Inclined 1--i Vertical + Horizontal downthrown side Bearing and plunge of lineation ~r--...,........,..~r--...,.... __ Normal fault-Hachured on down '~Inclined • Vertical- Horizontal thrown side Strike and dip of joints Fault-Showing relative horizontal ~ Inclined -+-Vertical + Horizontal movement Note: Planar symbols (strike and dip • + + + + + Thrust fault-Sawteeth on upper plate of beds, foliation or schistosity, and cleav age) may be combined with linear symbols to record data observed at ~ Anticline-Showing direction of plunge; same locality by superimposed symbols dashed where approximately located; at point of -
WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST Adam Mountain (8,200 Acres)
WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST Adam Mountain (8,200 acres) ........................................................................................................ 3 Ashcroft (900 acres) ........................................................................................................................ 4 Assignation Ridge (13,300 acres) ................................................................................................... 4 Baldy Mountain (6,100 acres) ......................................................................................................... 6 Basalt Mountain A (13,900 acres) .................................................................................................. 6 Basalt Mountain (7,400 acres) ........................................................................................................ 7 Berry Creek (8,600 acres) ............................................................................................................... 8 Big Ridge to South Fork A (35,400 acres) and Big Ridge to South Fork B (6,000 acres) ............. 9 Black Lake East (800 acres) and Black Lake West (900 acres) ................................................... 11 Blair Mountain (500 acres) ........................................................................................................... 12 Boulder (1,300 acres) .................................................................................................................... 13 Budges (1,000 acres) .................................................................................................................... -
Code of Colorado Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Wildlife CHAPTER 0 – GENERAL PROVISIONS 2 CCR 406-0 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] ARTICLE I – DEFINITIONS [Eff. 03/02/2009] #000 – The following definitions supplement the statutory definitions found in the Wildlife Act including, but not limited to, those definitions found in section 33-1-102, C.R.S. A. General Definitions Including Manner of Take Definitions 1. "Aggregate" when applied to bag and possession limits, means the total number of species which are covered by such bag and possession limits. Any combination of the species may be possessed up to the total number established as the aggregate bag and possession limits. 2. "Archery" means the use of a hand-held bow. 3. "Bag Limit" means the maximum number of wildlife which may be taken in a single day during an established open season. This includes any wildlife which are consumed or donated during the same day they were legally taken. The terms "bag limit," "daily bag" and "bag" are considered to have the same meaning. 4. "Baiting" means the placing, exposing, depositing, distributing, or scattering of any salt, mineral, grain, or other feed so as to constitute a lure, attraction or enticement for wildlife. 5. "Crossbow" means a bow which is attached at a right angle to a stock with a mechanical mechanism for holding the bow string in a cocked position and fired from the shoulder. 6. “Feral Hog” means any species or hybrid of species from the family Suidae (European boar, Eurasian boar, Russian boar, feral hog) or the family Tayassuidae (Javelina and peccary), which possesses one or more morphological characteristic distinguishing it from domestic swine including, but not limited to, an elongated snout, visible tusks, muscular shoulders with small hams and short loins, coarse hair, or a predominant ridge of hair along its back. -
Forest Wide Hazardous Tree Removal and Fuels Reduction Project
107°0'0"W VAIL k GYPSUM B e 6 u 6 N 1 k 2 k 1 h 2 e . e 6 . .1 I- 1 o 8 70 e c f 7 . r 0 e 2 2 §¨¦ e l 1 0 f 2 u 1 0 3 2 N 4 r r 0 1 e VailVail . 3 W . 8 . 1 85 3 Edwards 70 1 C 1 a C 1 .1 C 8 2 h N 1 G 7 . 7 0 m y 1 k r 8 §¨¦ l 2 m 1 e c . .E 9 . 6 z W A T m k 1 5 u C 0 .1 u 5 z i 6. e s 0 C i 1 B a -7 k s 3 2 .3 e e r I ee o C r a 1 F G Carterville h r e 9. 1 6 r g 1 N 9 g 8 r e 8 r y P e G o e u l Avon n C 9 N C r e n 5 ch w i r 8 .k2 0 N n D k 1 n 70 a tt e 9 6 6 8 G . c 7 o h 18 1 §¨¦ r I-7 o ra West Vail .1 1 y 4 u h 0 1 0. n lc 7 l D .W N T 7 39 . 71 . 1 a u 1 ch W C k 0 C d . 2 e . r e 1 e 1 C st G e e . r 7 A Red Hill R 3 9 k n s e 5 6 7 a t 2 . -
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections. -
DINO Park Map Copy
BROWNS PARK To Rock Springs, Wyoming NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Ve rm ill ion C 8530ft 10mi re 2600m e 16km k 318 Gates of Lodore 5360ft 1634m Po t Crouse Cre Canyon ek Road 318 E R Upper Disaster Falls UTAH O D Lower Disaster Falls O 15mi COLORADO L 23km N 18mi SI I A F A 29km D M O N B D O IA B Harp Falls O d G N a U N Zenobia Peak (fire tower) o L C E T A I N P H O Z 9005ft R O U N L A T M E A Y 2745m H D U ole N N W O A M I Hells Half Mile es L C Jon I A D Triplet Falls D D Jones Hole 8380ft O Fish Hatchery U 2554m G E M L l A y O k S l U i e N C a e r r T e r A ek T C IN e l o 44 s H e M s n O K 191 e o U n J C N o O J n T R ver e i A 5mi Jones Hole e R 9km r 7510ft T I N OOL CANY G 2289m A P O O RL N Warm Springs B HI Rapids W M A E S Harpers Corner 7625ft T T S A 2324m Echo Park (summer only) R McKee Spring ISLAND V A Petroglyphs PARK Ruple Ranch 5079ft T 2mi Echo Park 1548m IO 3km N Park 6mi d Road Overlook Islan 10km able when pass wet) 12mi (Im 5mi DINOSAUR NATIONAL MONUMENT 19km Rainbow Park ek V e 8km A 6mi (no water) r L C L 10km E Iron Springs Bench N Y Island Park Big Joe O Y Overlook Overlook 8mi N Rapids RUPLE l A YAMPA BENCH K I N o 13km C R U N TA Moonshine POINT o A T O 4mi S P L I T M P P Yam H D Rapids N E pa 7km E A L Schoolboy P S ST R Echo ar A Tepee A k d C Riv 500 North C Rapids oa HARDING er E R Rapids T Inglesby Harding Hole HOLE 4866ft R SOB Rapids Echo Park Road warning— A Desert Rapids N CANYON Castle Park Overlook Vernal 1483m C NTAI high-clearance vehicles only; K Voices OU Canyon Overlook Overlook Haystack Rock M impassable when wet. -
Colorado Topographic Maps, Scale 1:24,000 This List Contains The
Colorado Topographic Maps, scale 1:24,000 This list contains the quadrangle names and publication dates of all Colorado topographic maps published at the scale of 1:24,000 by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). One, non-circulating copy of each map is held in the Map Room Office. The Library does not own maps labeled "lacking." The maps are sorted alphabetically by sheet name. Colorado 1:24,000 Topos -- A Abarr 1974 printed 1977 Abarr SE 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Abeyta 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Adams Lake 1974 printed 1978 (dark), 1978 (light) 1974 (without color) printed 1978 1987 printed 1988 Adena 1963 printed 1965, 1975 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1984 printed 1984 1984 (without color) printed 1984 Adler Creek 1968 printed 1971 1968 (without color) printed 1971 Adobe Downs Ranch, New Mexico-Colorado 1963 printed 1965 1963 (without color) printed 1965 1979 printed 1980 (dark), 1980 (light) Adobe Springs 1969 printed 1972, 1992 1969 (without color) printed 1972 Agate 1970 printed 1973 (dark), 1973 (light) 1970 (without color) printed 1973 Agate Mountain 1983 printed 1983 1994 printed 1998 Aguilar 1971 printed 1974 1971 (without color) printed 1974 Akron 1973 printed 1976 1973 (without color) printed 1976 Akron SE 1973 printed 1976 Akron SW 1973 printed 1976 Alamosa East 1966 printed 1968, 1975 1966 (without color) printed 1968 Alamosa West 1966 printed 1969, 1971 1966 (without color) printed 1969 Aldrich Gulch 1957 printed 1958, 1964, 1975 (dark), 1975 (light) 1957 (without color) -
A Conservation Blueprint for Neotropical Migratory Birds in Western Colorado
A Conservation Blueprint for Neotropical Migratory Birds in Western Colorado Michelle Fink, David Hanni, David Klute, John Sovell, and Renée Rondeau December 2007 Photo by Dave Menke, Photo Courtesy of U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Final report submitted to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (Neotropical Migratory Bird Act). Executive Summary The purpose of this project was to incorporate land use, policy, and biological inputs to define areas representing the most important opportunities for conservation of Neotropical migratory birds in coniferous and aspen forest habitats in Western Colorado and to understand the current status and requirements for maintaining viable populations of these migratory birds within the project area. To that end, we used NatureServe Vista, a decision-support software, and SPOT, a conservation portfolio optimization software, to analyze information about bird distribution, abundance, conservation priorities, quantitative conservation goals, threats to ecosystem stability, and current landscape integrity in order to identify conservation needs and opportunities for birds in aspen and conifer forests in western Colorado. Twenty-two forest-based bird species were used as conservation targets. Multi-year survey data from the Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory was combined with data from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s Biodiversity Tracking and Conservation System (BIOTICS) database in addition to modified Southwest Regional GAP vertebrate models for the target species. We used available statewide spatial data to determine general landscape integrity for these species, current and future predicted land use, and policy mandated protection status. This information was then input in NatureServe Vista and SPOT projects and evaluated against varying conservation goal sets for the target species. -
Landscape Character Descriptions of the White River National Forest
Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 3 Landscape Character Descriptions of the White River National Forest Headwaters of the South Fork of the White River Jan Spencer – Landscape Architect Writer/Editor Ron Wright – Soil Scientist Bill Kight – Heritage Resource Manager Kit Buell – Wildlife Biologist Carolyn Upton – Social/Economics Specialist Marsha Raus – Fisheries Biologist Narrative and Photography Contributors: Ron Taussig, Beth Boyst, George Myser, Tom Kuekes, Al Grimshaw, Dan Mathews, Paula Johnston, Kathy Hardy, Angela Glenn, Gary Osier P-1 Appendix P White River National Forest Preface The word landscape evokes certain unique and special images and meanings to each of us as individuals. As children we may have attached a sense of place to some small parcel of ground, be it a backyard or an open meadow blooming with the rainbow color of wildflowers. The rest of our lives then build upon those early impressions, layer upon layer of geographic recognition. Year after year we go back to a stream, yet each time we fish there we read something new into the landscape. It may even be some picnic spot with a backdrop of mountain majesty we can still see in our mind even with our eyes closed. These places uplift our spirit, but we are hard-pressed to put into words exactly how or why we feel the way we do. The comforting sense of familiarity a prominent granite peak holds for us never quite gets communicated beyond the photo image. “Like all real treasures of the mind, perception can be split into infinitely small fractions without losing its quality. -
Craig Interagency Dispatch Center
Craig Interagency Dispatch Center Field Operations Guide 2021 This guide is intended to familiarize you with our local organizations and operating procedures. Please keep it handy and review it frequently. General In-briefing and Debriefing Checklists pg. 2 Organizations and Cooperators pg. 4 Area & Zone Maps pg. 11 Dispatch Operations pg. 16 Expectations pg. 17 Initial Attack Operations and Protocol pg. 18 FireCode Chart pg. 26 Logistics and Administration pg. 27 Implementation of Federal Wildland Fire Policy-Response to Wildland Fire /FMP pg. 28 Fire Management Units pg. 29 Run Cards pg. 31 USFS/NPS Routt National Forest Operations pg. 45 Dinosaur National Monument Fire Operations pg. 51 Fire Behavior and Tactics Weather pg. 53 Fuels pg. 54 Critical Fuel Moistures pg. 58 Pocket Cards pg. 59 Oil and Gas Field Safety pg. 61 Wildland Fire Risk and Hazard Assessment pg. 65 Aviation pg. 69 Communications pg. 81 IA Aircraft Communications Zone Map pg. 90 Incident Management Teams (IMT’s) pg. 91 Emergency Procedures pg. 95 1 IN-BRIEFING CHECKLIST From Dispatch _____ Copy of current weather forecast _____ Current & expected activity (if Zone FMO not available) _____ Size-up cards _____ Area map packets (please return at end of assignment) _____ NWDFA visitor briefing (Field Operations Guide) _____ Logistics To Dispatch _____ Manifest, phone numbers and radio call sign provided to dispatch _____ Hotel or cell number provided to dispatch for after-hours dispatches _____ Copy of contracts from contract resources _____ Copy of Redcards (give copy to AFMO) From Zone FMO’s _____ Current & expected fire situation _____ Oil & gas briefing _____ Unexploded ordnance (UXO) briefing _____ Fuels & tactics briefing including Fire Management Plan, appropriate response and fire restrictions _____ Radios programmed _____ Timesheet and equipment shift tickets initiated with proper charge codes e.g. -
¥¦70 $+9 $+6 $+7 ¥¦70
]" 77 3 6 023 60 2 32 3 .1 6 C N199 701 ! 73 1 4 70 7 0 0 0 ! ! 2 7 0 e r u t l u c i r g A f o t n e m t r a p e D s e t a t S d e t i n U 5 0 ! 7 3 1 02 6 7 290000 300000 310000 320000 330000 340000 350000 360000 7 370000 107°30'0"W 107°22'30"W 107°15'0"W 107°7'30"W 107°0'0"W 106°52'30"W 106°45'0"W 106°37'30"W 106°30'0"W ! e c i v r e S t s e r o F o d a r o l o C Blue !C ! Lake 7 ! Flatiron Mountain 1 E 7 ! R ! a 0 2 y a M - 3 2 v o N : s e t a D e v i t c e f f E i ! g f g Haypress l l l e ! e e Casteel Ridge 7 74 ! Lake R ! R Legend ! ! See Eagle/Holy Cross ! ! a a ! ! ! n n ! ! ! n n Gypsum !Winter Motor Vehicle Use Map Bellyache Ridge ! g g Dotsero g Plowed Route: g ! e e e e ! ]" r r ! 774 r Route maintained for winter r Eagle ! ! D 60 D D 2 D !C wheeled motor vehicle access 70 i i Eagle Ranger i i s 4390000 s Burnt Tree Ridge 4390000 s s t t ¥¦ Edwards t t r r District Office r r i i c c i i c c t 39°37'30"N t t Route shown in Open Motorized area t for informational purposes only 23 6 +$ +$25 ¤£ ! ! ! Designated Routes in Restricted Areas: Avon ]" Routes open to over-snow motorized Red Hill 307 n +$ 39°37'30"N vehicles where over-snow travel is yo an restricted to designated routes C d (100 feet either side) oo nw le !C G Motorized Prohibited Areas: Storm King Mountain 25A Holy Cross ]"!C Area where no motorized +$ Ranger District over-snow use is permitted 2 137 0 8A +$ 6 Spruce Ridge +$ Bellyache Mountain Office Horse Mountain Restricted Areas - Motorized RouteNs eOwnly C: astle Gobbler Knob North Hardscrabble Mountain Area where motorized over-snow ! 10A Minturn er Distr +$ 102 use is permitted only on designated ng ict +$ motorized routes. -
Press Kit Website Address 1280 Ute Avenue Suite 21 Aspen,Colorado 81611 Telephone 970/925-4554
PRESS KIT WEBSITE www.huts.org ADDRESS 1280 Ute Avenue│Suite 21│Aspen,Colorado 81611 TELEPHONE 970/925-4554 Ben Dodge | Executive Director | [email protected] Press Inquiries | Cindy Carpenter | [email protected] A HISTORY 10th Mountain Division Hut Association TH MOUNTAIN DIVISION HuT ASSOCIATION is a product of 10 one man’s dream. In this case the man is Fritz Benedict, an architect who has been closely involved in the design of Aspen, Vail and other ski area com- munities. Benedict’s dream was influenced by a system of huts in New Hampshire that dates back over 100 years, as well as the famous skiing Haute Route between Chamonix, France and Zermatt, Switzerland. In Benedict’s mind, a similar system connecting Aspen and Vail, Colorado seemed a logical way to provide access to Colorado’s beautiful and challenging backcountry during the winter months. It was also his dream to honor the infantrymen of the U.S. Army’s 10th Moun- tain Division, who learned their skiing and mountaineering skills at Camp Hale, north of Leadville near Tennessee Pass. In fact, much of the territory that now comprises the 10th Mountain Division Hut Association was originally part of the training ground for 10th Mountain Division troops, who fought critical battles in the Italian Dolomites near the end of World War II. Many of the soldiers went on to become key figures in the ski industry. In 1980 Benedict began putting his dream together. At that time he formed what later was to become the 10th Mountain Division Hut Association. The group con- sisted of architects, planners and backcountry guides, all of whom were keen to see Benedict’s dream realized.