DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Personalization 2005: a Workshop on the Next Stage Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond Personalization 2005: a Workshop on the Next Stage Of Beyond Personalization 2005 A Workshop on the Next Stage of Recommender Systems Research San Diego, January 9, 2005 In conjunction with the 2005 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI 2005) Edited by: Mark van Setten Sean McNee Joseph Konstan http://www.grouplens.org http://www.telin.nl http://www.multimedian.nl Table of Contents About the Workshop 5 Organization 6 Full papers Crossing the Rubicon for An Intelligent Advisor 7 Răzvan Andonie, J. Edward Russo, Rishi Dean Explaining Recommendations: Satisfaction vs. Promotion 13 Mustafa Bilgic, Raymond J. Mooney Identifying Attack Models for Secure Recommendation 19 Robin Burke, Bamshad Mobasher, Roman Zabicki, Runa Bhaumik User-Specific Decision-Theoretic Accuracy Metrics for Collaborative Filtering 26 Giuseppe Carenini Off-Topic Recommendations 31 Elyon DeKoven Item-Triggered Recommendation for Identifying Potential Customers of Cold Sellers in 37 Supermarkets Han-Shen Huang, Koung-Lung Lin, Jane Yung-jen Hsu, Chun-Nan Hsu The Good, Bad and the Indifferent: Explorations in Recommender System Health 43 Benjamin J. Keller, Sun-mi Kim, N. Srinivas Vemuri, Naren Ramakrishnan, Saverio Perugini Impacts of Contextualized Communication of Privacy Practices and Personalization Benefits on 48 Purchase Behavior and Perceived Quality of Recommendation Alfred Kobsa, Max Teltzrow InterestMap: Harvesting Social Network Profiles for Recommendations 54 Hugo Liu, Pattie Maes What Affects Printing Options? - Toward Personalization & Recommendation System for 60 Printing Devices Masashi Nakatomi, Soichiro Iga, Makoto Shinnishi, Tetsuro Nagatsuka, Atsuo Shimada P2P-based PVR Recommendation using Friends, Taste Buddies and Superpeers 66 Johan Pouwelse, Michiel van Slobbe, Jun Wang, Henk Sips DynamicLens: A Dynamic User-Interface for A Meta-Recommendation System 72 J. Ben Schafer Modeling a Dialogue Strategy for Personalized Movie Recommendations 77 Pontus Wärnestål Behavior-based Recommender Systems for Web Content 83 Tingshao Zhu, Russ Greiner, Gerald Häubl, Bob Price, Kevin Jewell Position statements Who do trust? Combining Recommender Systems and Social Networking for Better Advice 89 Philip Bonhard 3 Recommender Systems Research at Yahoo! Research Labs 91 Dennis Decoste, David Gleich, Tejaswi Kasturi, Sathiya Keerthi, Omid Madani, Seung-Taek Park, David M. Pennock, Corey Porter, Sumit Sanghai, Farial Shahnaz, Leonid Zhukov A Multi-agent Smart User Model for Cross-domain Recommender Systems 93 Gustavo González, Beatriz López, Josep Lluís de la Rosa Personalized Product Recommendations and Consumer Purchase Decisions 95 Gerald Häubl, Kyle B. Murray Toward a Personal Recommender System 97 Bradley N. Miller Beyond Idiot Savants: Recommendations and Common Sense 99 Michael J. Pazzani Towards More Personalized Navigation in Mobile Three-dimensional Virtual Environments 101 Teija Vainio Issues of Applying Collaborative Filtering Recommendations in Information Retrieval 103 Xiangmin Zhang 4 About the Workshop This workshop intends to bring recommender systems researchers and practitioners together in order to discuss the current state of recommender systems research, both on existing and emerging research topics, and to determine how research in this area should proceed. We are at a pivotal point in recommender systems research where researchers are both looking inward at what recommender systems are and looking outward at where recommender systems can be applied, and the implications of applying them out 'in the wild.' This creates a unique opportunity to both reassess the current state of research and directions research is taking in the near and long term. Background and Motivation In the early days of recommender systems research, most research focused on recommender algorithms, such as collaborative filtering and case-based reasoning. Since then, research has gone off into various directions. Some researchers continued working on the algorithmic aspects of recommenders, including a move to hybrid and group recommenders; others have been researching the application of recommenders in specific domains; yet others focused on user interface aspects of recommender systems. This has led to the current state in which recommender systems are mature enough to be applied in various adaptive applications and websites. They have been deployed on several large e-commerce websites, such as Amazon.com; they are being integrated into corporate document warehouses; and they are still the center of focus for several research groups around the world. Moreover, these systems are appearing in products and services used by people around the world, such as personalized television programming and Internet- broadcast radio stations, movie recommenders, and even dating services. This workshop aims to answer questions raised both by researchers and practitioners in order to improve both recommender quality and use. Issues discussed at the workshop will have an effect on these systems—and more importantly, the users of these systems—worldwide. Topics and Goals This workshop will focus on the following four main topics: 1. Understanding and trusting recommender systems. Do users understand and trust the recommendations they receive from recommender systems, what kinds of information do recommenders need to provide to users to build trust, and how difficult is it to regain trust in a recommender if it is lost? 2. User interfaces for recommender systems. What are good ways to present recommendations to users, how do you integrate recommenders into the displays of existing information systems, and how can interfaces encourage users to provide ratings in order to 'close the loop' for recommendations, that is, how can you get users to consume the items recommended and then tell the system how good the recommendations are? 3. The future of recommendation algorithms and metrics. How can we generate better individual and group recommendations, develop new metrics and evaluation criteria for recommendations, and achieve cross-domain recommendations? 4. Social consequences and opportunities of recommenders. How do individuals and groups of people respond to recommendations, how can recommendations be integrated with online and real world communities, and in what ways do recommendations affect social organizations? Intended Audience The workshop is intended for both established researchers and practioners in the domain of recommender systems as well as for new researchers and students with interesting ideas on recommender systems and their future. Participants do not have to come from a specific application domain, as long as their research or ideas are on one of the main topics of the workshop. Website All papers and the results of the workshop are also available online at: http://www.grouplens.org/beyond2005 5 Organization Workshop Chairs Mark van Setten Telematica Instituut P.O. Box 589 7500 AN Enschede The Netherlands E-mail: [email protected] Sean M. McNee GroupLens Research Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA E-mail: [email protected] Joseph A. Konstan GroupLens Research Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Minnesota Minneapolis, MN, 55455 USA E-mail: [email protected] Program Committee Liliana Ardissono - University of Torino (Italy) Jon Herlocker - Oregon State University (USA) Anton Nijholt - University of Twente (The Netherlands) Barry Smyth - University College Dublin and Changing Worlds (Ireland) Loren Terveen - University of Minnesota (USA) Additional Reviewers Betsy van Dijk – University of Twente (The Netherlands) Harry van Vliet – Telematica Instituut (The Netherlands) 6 Crossing the Rubicon for An Intelligent Advisor Razv˘ an Andonie J. Edward Russo Computer Science Department Johnson Graduate School of Management Central Washington University, Ellensburg, USA Cornell University, Ithaca, USA [email protected] [email protected] Rishi Dean Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA [email protected] ABSTRACT years now, we are still at the beginning of using RS on a Recommender systems (RS) are being used by an increasing large scale. In reality, sellers provide an RS to help improve number of e-commerce sites to help consumers find prod- the (long-term) business relationship. This goal gives rise to ucts to purchase. We define here the features that may char- several desiderata that can be difficult to achieve. The RS acterize an ”intelligent” RS, based on behavioral science, should be flexible, scalable, multifunctional, adaptive, and data mining, and computational intelligence concepts. We able to solve complex search and decision problems. present our conclusions from building the WiseUncle Inc. The RS interface with the customer should be based on the RS, named Rubicon, and give its general description. Rather same consumer psychology knowledge and strategies used in than being an advisor for a particular application, Rubicon is marketing. Behind this ”visible” task, a RS can bring valu- a generic RS, a platform for generating application specific able information to marketers, making them improve their advisors. offer and products (customer profiling, marketing segmenta- tion). For instance, RS can help businesses decide to whom Keywords to send a customized offer or promotion. Recommender systems, electronic commerce, user interface, RS use knowledge to guide consumers through the of- user modeling ten overwhelming task of locating suitable products. This knowledge may come from experts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I Want My Mythtv
    I want my MythTV Tim Fenn [email protected] What are DVRs? ● Digital Video Recorders - digital devices used to schedule/record television programs ● typically include features like fast forward, rewind, pause recorded and ªliveº TV ● standalone service - e.g. TiVo, Replay TV ● integrated service ± e.g. Comcast How does MythTV compare? ● Free and open source ● for users, by users ● Runs under Linux and (frontend only) MacOSX ● SQL backbone ● client/server architecture (think: one box for inputs/recording, any other number of boxes for viewing) ● nobody cares what you do with it or how you use it (10 capture cards? Sure! Can I control my lights and ceiling fans using the same box? OK! Watch/burn/rip DVDs? DeCSS, hah!) ● Con: requires know-how of hardware and (primarily Linux) software So what is MythTV capable of? Example screenshots... Example screenshots... Example screenshots... Example screenshots... Example screenshots... Example screenshots... Required Hardware (backend) ● TV capture card: – Hauppauge PVR cards (150/250/350/500) are very popular (encoding done in hardware) ($70-200)1 ● well supported in linux (Chris Kennedy, Tyler Trafford, John Harvey et al. and some actual vendor support on register settings)2 – older bttv (bt848/bt878) chipsets (WinTV-Go, etc, etc...) – Plextor ConvertX PX-TV402U (USB 2.0 device) ● fully open sourced SDK (and gave free stuff to Isaac Richards)3 1. http://www.hauppauge.com 2. http://www.ivtv.tv 3. http://www.plextor.com/english/support/LinuxSDK.htm Required Hardware (backend) ● currently supported HDTV cards require encoding in software (computationally demanding, requires a P4 and ~9gig/hr of media) – very tricky for several reasons: OTA/QAM/resolution/DVB vs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grouplens Perspective
    From: AAAI Technical Report WS-98-08. Compilation copyright © 1998, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. RecommenderSystems: A GroupLensPerspective Joseph A. Konstan*t , John Riedl *t, AI Borchers,* and Jonathan L. Herlocker* *GroupLensResearch Project *Net Perceptions,Inc. Dept. of ComputerScience and Engineering 11200 West78th Street University of Minnesota Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN55455 Minneapolis, MN55344 http://www.cs.umn.edu/Research/GroupLens/ http://www.netperceptions.com/ ABSTRACT identifying sets of articles by keyworddoes not scale to a In this paper, wereview the history and research findings of situation in which there are thousands of articles that the GroupLensResearch project I and present the four broad contain any imaginable set of keywords. Taken together, research directions that we feel are most critical for these two weaknesses represented an opportunity for a new recommender systems. type of filtering, that would focus on finding which INTRODUCTION:A History of the GroupLensProject available articles matchhuman notions of quality and taste. The GroupLens Research project began at the Computer Such a system would be able to produce a list of articles Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)Conference in 1992. that each user wouldlike, independentof their content. Oneof the keynote speakers at the conference lectured on a Wedecided to apply our ideas in the domain of Usenet his vision of an emerging information economy,in which news. Usenet screamsfor better information filtering, with most of the effort in the economywould revolve around hundreds of thousands of articles posted daily. Manyof the production, distribution, and consumptionof information, articles in each Usenet newsgroupare on the sametopic, so rather than physical goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • Rose City Salon
    Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 2016 Rose City Salon Joan Brown Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Brown, Joan, "Rose City Salon" (2016). University Honors Theses. Paper 263. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.253 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Rose City Salon by Joan Brown An undergraduate honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in University Honors and English Thesis Adviser A.B. Paulson, Ph.D. Portland State University 2016 1 Rose City Salon Chapter One January 2005 Standing at the reception counter and looking through the salon’s windows onto Fifth Avenue, Jillian watched as a round woman wearing a burgundy and turquoise caftan with matching turban drug a golden, hard-shell suitcase across three lanes of traffic, against the light. Cars honked. Brakes screeched. Nothing stopped the woman’s imperial progress. Jillian, practically hypnotized, wished she were that assertive. Outside great gusts of winded surged down the Columbia River Gorge and pounded Portland while January’s white sun had already begun descending into the west. Inside the salon lights were turned to medium high, lazily moving fans pulled around cinnamon scented air, and Dirty Vegas played through the sound system.
    [Show full text]
  • I Know What You Streamed Last Night: on the Security and Privacy of Streaming
    Digital Investigation xxx (2018) 1e12 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Digital Investigation journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/diin DFRWS 2018 Europe d Proceedings of the Fifth Annual DFRWS Europe I know what you streamed last night: On the security and privacy of streaming * Alexios Nikas a, Efthimios Alepis b, Constantinos Patsakis b, a University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK b Department of Informatics, University of Piraeus, 80 Karaoli & Dimitriou Str, 18534 Piraeus, Greece article info abstract Article history: Streaming media are currently conquering traditional multimedia by means of services like Netflix, Received 3 January 2018 Amazon Prime and Hulu which provide to millions of users worldwide with paid subscriptions in order Received in revised form to watch the desired content on-demand. Simultaneously, numerous applications and services infringing 15 February 2018 this content by sharing it for free have emerged. The latter has given ground to a new market based on Accepted 12 March 2018 illegal downloads which monetizes from ads and custom hardware, often aggregating peers to maximize Available online xxx multimedia content sharing. Regardless of the ethical and legal issues involved, the users of such streaming services are millions and they are severely exposed to various threats, mainly due to poor Keywords: fi Security hardware and software con gurations. Recent attacks have also shown that they may, in turn, endanger Privacy others as well. This work details these threats and presents new attacks on these systems as well as Streaming forensic evidence that can be collected in specific cases. Malware © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recommender System for Groups of Users
    PolyLens: A Recommender System for Groups of Users Mark O’Connor, Dan Cosley, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA {oconnor;cosley;konstan;riedl}@cs.umn.edu Abstract. We present PolyLens, a new collaborative filtering recommender system designed to recommend items for groups of users, rather than for individuals. A group recommender is more appropriate and useful for domains in which several people participate in a single activity, as is often the case with movies and restaurants. We present an analysis of the primary design issues for group recommenders, including questions about the nature of groups, the rights of group members, social value functions for groups, and interfaces for displaying group recommendations. We then report on our PolyLens prototype and the lessons we learned from usage logs and surveys from a nine-month trial that included 819 users. We found that users not only valued group recommendations, but were willing to yield some privacy to get the benefits of group recommendations. Users valued an extension to the group recommender system that enabled them to invite non-members to participate, via email. Introduction Recommender systems (Resnick & Varian, 1997) help users faced with an overwhelming selection of items by identifying particular items that are likely to match each user’s tastes or preferences (Schafer et al., 1999). The most sophisticated systems learn each user’s tastes and provide personalized recommendations. Though several machine learning and personalization technologies can attempt to learn user preferences, automated collaborative filtering (Resnick et al., 1994; Shardanand & Maes, 1995) has become the preferred real-time technology for personal recommendations, in part because it leverages the experiences of an entire community of users to provide high quality recommendations without detailed models of either content or user tastes.
    [Show full text]
  • Community, Impact and Credit: Where Should I Submit My Papers?
    Panels February 23–27, 2013, San Antonio, Texas, USA Community, Impact and Credit: Where should I submit my papers? Abstract Aaron Halfaker R. Stuart Geiger We (the authors of CSCWs program) have finite time and GroupLens Research School of Information energy that can be invested into our publications and the University of Minnesota University of CA, Berkeley research communities we value. While we want our work [email protected] [email protected] to have the most impact possible, we also want to grow Cliff Lampe Loren Terveen and support productive research communities within School of Information GroupLens Research which to have this impact. This panel discussion explores Michigan State University University of Minnesota the costs and benefits of submitting papers to various [email protected] [email protected] tiers of conferences and journals surrounding CSCW and Amy Bruckman Brian Keegan reflects on the value of investing hours into building up a College of Computing Northeastern University research community. Georgia Inst. of Technology [email protected] [email protected] Author Keywords Aniket Kittur Geraldine Fitzpatrick community; credit; impact; publishing; peer review HCI Institute Vienna University of Carnegie Mellon University Technology ACM Classification Keywords [email protected] geraldine.fi[email protected] H.5.0. [Information Interfaces and Presentation (e.g. HCI)]: General Introduction We (the authors of CSCWs program) have finite time and energy that can be invested into our publications and the research communities we value. In order to allow our work to have an impact, we must also grow and maintain Copyright is held by the author/owner(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Improvements in Holistic Recommender System Research
    Improvements in Holistic Recommender System Research A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Daniel Allen Kluver IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Joseph A. Konstan August, 2018 c Daniel Allen Kluver 2018 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my family, my friends, my advisers John Riedl and Joseph Konstan, my colleagues, both at GroupLens research and at Macalester College, and everyone else who believed in me and supported me along the way. Your support meant everything when I couldn’t support myself. Your belief meant everything when I couldn’t believe in myself. I couldn’t have done this without your help. i Abstract Since the mid 1990s, recommender systems have grown to be a major area of de- ployment in industry, and research in academia. A through-line in this research has been the pursuit, above all else, of the perfect algorithm. With this admirable focus has come a neglect of the full scope of building, maintaining, and improving recom- mender systems. In this work I outline a system deployment and a series of offline and online experiments dedicated to improving our holistic understanding of recommender systems. This work explores the design, algorithms, early performance, and interfaces of recommender systems within the scope of how they are interconnected with other aspects of the system. This work explores many indivisual aspects of a recommender system while keeping in mind how they are connected to other aspects of
    [Show full text]
  • Betreutes Fernsehen Bitparade
    08/2016 Myth-TV, Kodi, Plex, OSMC und DVB-Link im Test Software Betreutes Fernsehen Bitparade 46 Fernsehsendungen sehen und aufzeichnen, HD-Videos streamen, Musik hören, Bilder betrachten und noch einige Tricks mehr versprechen freie und kommerzielle Mediacenter-Programme für Linux-PCs, aber auch für den Raspberry Pi. Die Bitparade holt sich fünf Kandidaten ins heimische Wohnzimmer. Erik Bärwaldt www.linux-magazin.de Auge gefasste Gerät mitbringt. Als erste Anlaufstelle hierbei dient das Wiki des Linux-TV-Projekts [6], das über eine um- fangreiche Hardwaredatenbank verfügt. Die enthält auch wertvolle Installations- hinweise, da der User mancherorts für DVB- und Analog-TV-Komponenten noch proprietäre Firmware in das Mediacenter integrieren muss. Ein weiterer Stolperstein taucht auf, möchte der User auf einem bereits be- stehenden Linux-System manuell Media- center-Applikationen nachinstallieren. Da die Multimedia-Software meist als Client- Server-Applikation arbeitet, zieht Linux häufig noch die üblichen Verdächtigen hinterher, etwa Apaches Webserver, PHP 7 oder das MySQL-Datenbank-Back end. Hierbei treten unter Umständen Probleme auf, die unerfahrene Anwender überfor- © leeavison, 123RF © leeavison, dern und erfahrene nerven. Beiden Gruppen sei geraten, zu dedizier- Computertechnik und Unterhaltungs- stellt sich für den Interessenten erst ein- ten Mediacenter-Distributionen zu grei- elektronik wachsen immer weiter zusam- mal die Frage, welches Mediacenter sich fen. Die stimmen die einzelnen Kom- men. So nimmt es nicht Wunder, dass es für ihn eignet. Um die Qual der Wahl ab- ponenten optimal aufeinander ab und neben den herkömmlichen multimedialen zukürzen, vergleicht das Linux-Magazin konfigurieren sie vor. Speziell angepasste Computerprogrammen inzwischen ganze mit Myth-TV [1], Kodi [2], Plex Media- Installationsroutinen integrieren oft auch Softwaresuiten gibt, die den Computer im server [3], OSMC [4] und DVB-Link [5] gleich die Netzwerkdienste ins System.
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Lies of What People Are Really Thinking
    Dedication For Lex and Stella Epigraph Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth —Falsely attributed to Marcus Aurelius (author unknown) Contents Cover Title Page Dedication Epigraph Introduction Part One Genuine Deceptions 1 Body Language Lies 2 Powerful Thinking 3 Mind Your Judgments 4 Scan for Truth Part Two Dating 5 They’re Totally Checking Me Out! 6 Playing Hard-to-Get 7 Just Feeling Sorry for Me 8 I’m Being Ghosted 9 What a Complete Psycho! 10 They Are Running the Show 11 I’m Going to Pay for That! 12 They Are So Mad at Me 13 A Lying Cheat? 14 Definitely into My Friend 15 A Match Made in Heaven? 16 They Are So Breaking Up! Part Three Friends and Family 17 Thick as Thieves 18 My New Bff? 19 Fomo 20 Control Freak 21 Too Close for Comfort 22 They’ll Never Fit in with My Family 23 House on Fire! 24 I Am Boring the Pants off Them 25 Lying Through Their Teeth 26 Persona Non Grata 27 Invisible Me Part Four Working Life 28 I Aced That Interview—So, Where’s the Job Offer? 29 They Hate My Work 30 Big Dog 31 Never Going to See Eye to Eye 32 Cold Fish 33 They’re Gonna Blow! 34 This Meeting Is a Waste of Time 35 Looks Like a Winning Team 36 So, You Think You’re the Boss 37 Hand in the Cookie Jar Summary Bonus Bluff Learn more Acknowledgments Notes About the Authors Praise for Truth & Lies Also by Mark Bowden Copyright About the Publisher Introduction WE CAN ALL RECALL EXAMPLES when our sense of what another person was thinking turned out to be the truth.
    [Show full text]
  • 132093859.Pdf
    MediaPortal Mais: LinuxMCE em detalhes O Media Portal é um programa gratuito, desenvolvido WINDOWS MEDIA CENTER como Software Livre, e uma opção para quem quer montar um Media Center sem abandonar o Windows XP. Originalmente uma versão especializada do Windows, o Mais: MediaPortal em detalhes Windows Media Center agora é parte das edições Home Premium e Ultimate do Windows Vista. Não é necessário MythTV instalar ou configurar nada separadamente, o programa é instalado junto com o sistema operacional e pode ser O MythTV é o sistema media center baseado em Linux acessado via ícone no menu Iniciar. mais popular no mercado, e usá-lo como base para seu media center tem algumas vantagens. A principal, e mais O Windows Media Center oferece tudo o que você pode óbvia delas, é o preço. Uma licença do Windows Vista precisar em um media center básico, inclusive opções de Home Premium, que já inclui o Windows Media Center, gravação e reprodução de TV ao vivo. custa perto de R$ 500. Já uma cópia da versão mais recente do Fedora ou Ubuntu mais o MythTV custa zero: Com hardware extra, você pode fazer o computador ambos podem ser baixados gratuitamente da Internet. simular um controle remoto para comandar o decodificador de TV a cabo e agendar gravações sem Mais: MythTV em detalhes falhas mesmo estando fora de casa. A programação deste recurso é meio maçante: a maioria dos decodificadores de LinuxMCE TV a cabo no mercado nacional não consta na lista do Windows Media Center, e você terá de fazer a Este novato no mundo dos Media Centers também roda programação manual, apertando cada botão do controle sobre o Linux, mais especificamente sobre o Kubuntu, remoto várias vezes até o micro aprender os comandos.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Zittrain's “The Future of the Internet: and How to Stop
    The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Jonathan L. Zittrain, The Future of the Internet -- And How to Stop It (Yale University Press & Penguin UK 2008). Published Version http://futureoftheinternet.org/ Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4455262 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page i The Future of the Internet— And How to Stop It YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page ii YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iii The Future of the Internet And How to Stop It Jonathan Zittrain With a New Foreword by Lawrence Lessig and a New Preface by the Author Yale University Press New Haven & London YD8852.i-x 1/20/09 1:59 PM Page iv A Caravan book. For more information, visit www.caravanbooks.org. The cover was designed by Ivo van der Ent, based on his winning entry of an open competition at www.worth1000.com. Copyright © 2008 by Jonathan Zittrain. All rights reserved. Preface to the Paperback Edition copyright © Jonathan Zittrain 2008. Subject to the exception immediately following, this book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • User Session Identification Based on Strong Regularities in Inter-Activity
    User Session Identification Based on Strong Regularities in Inter-activity Time Aaron Halfaker Os Keyes Daniel Kluver Wikimedia Foundation Wikimedia Foundation GroupLens Research [email protected] [email protected] University of Minnesota [email protected] Jacob Thebault-Spieker Tien Nguyen Kenneth Shores GroupLens Research GroupLens Research GroupLens Research University of Minnesota University of Minnesota University of Minnesota [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Anuradha Uduwage Morten Warncke-Wang GroupLens Research GroupLens Research University of Minnesota University of Minnesota [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Session identification is a common strategy used to develop In 2012, we had an idea for a measurement strategy that metrics for web analytics and behavioral analyses of user- would bring insight and understanding to the nature of par- facing systems. Past work has argued that session identifica- ticipation in an online community. While studying partic- tion strategies based on an inactivity threshold is inherently ipation in Wikipedia, the open, collaborative encyclopedia, arbitrary or advocated that thresholds be set at about 30 we found ourselves increasingly curious about the amount of minutes. In this work, we demonstrate a strong regularity time that volunteer contributors invested into the encyclope- in the temporal rhythms of user initiated events across sev- dia's construction. Past work measuring editor engagement eral different domains of online activity (incl. video gaming, relied on counting the number of contributions made by a search, page views and volunteer contributions). We de- user1, but we felt that the amount of time editors spent scribe a methodology for identifying clusters of user activity editing might serve as a more appropriate measure.
    [Show full text]