Truth and Lies of What People Are Really Thinking

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Truth and Lies of What People Are Really Thinking Dedication For Lex and Stella Epigraph Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth —Falsely attributed to Marcus Aurelius (author unknown) Contents Cover Title Page Dedication Epigraph Introduction Part One Genuine Deceptions 1 Body Language Lies 2 Powerful Thinking 3 Mind Your Judgments 4 Scan for Truth Part Two Dating 5 They’re Totally Checking Me Out! 6 Playing Hard-to-Get 7 Just Feeling Sorry for Me 8 I’m Being Ghosted 9 What a Complete Psycho! 10 They Are Running the Show 11 I’m Going to Pay for That! 12 They Are So Mad at Me 13 A Lying Cheat? 14 Definitely into My Friend 15 A Match Made in Heaven? 16 They Are So Breaking Up! Part Three Friends and Family 17 Thick as Thieves 18 My New Bff? 19 Fomo 20 Control Freak 21 Too Close for Comfort 22 They’ll Never Fit in with My Family 23 House on Fire! 24 I Am Boring the Pants off Them 25 Lying Through Their Teeth 26 Persona Non Grata 27 Invisible Me Part Four Working Life 28 I Aced That Interview—So, Where’s the Job Offer? 29 They Hate My Work 30 Big Dog 31 Never Going to See Eye to Eye 32 Cold Fish 33 They’re Gonna Blow! 34 This Meeting Is a Waste of Time 35 Looks Like a Winning Team 36 So, You Think You’re the Boss 37 Hand in the Cookie Jar Summary Bonus Bluff Learn more Acknowledgments Notes About the Authors Praise for Truth & Lies Also by Mark Bowden Copyright About the Publisher Introduction WE CAN ALL RECALL EXAMPLES when our sense of what another person was thinking turned out to be the truth. Equally so, there have been times when we were so sure we were reading another person right only to discover, after the fact, how dead wrong we were. Sometimes, we learn the hard way that we were purposely lied to and cannot believe we did not see it for even one moment . until it was too late. Chances are that no matter the case, we were relying to some extent on correctly reading another’s body language. We are inundated through news and social media with clickbait, articles and guides on how to read body language, which attempt to make it quick and easy for us to glance at someone and deduce their most secret thoughts. For example, they’ve crossed their arms, so obviously they don’t like what I’m saying. They’ve pointed their feet elsewhere—clearly, they are more attracted to someone else in the room. They scratched their nose, so they’re a no-good liar. The problem is that while some of the time our “quick read” of someone’s body language may correctly uncover the truth about what they are thinking, all too often our readings and interpretations prove incorrect in the moment and we get it horribly wrong. On a good day there is only about a fifty-fifty chance of being correct. Having said that, people who are truly practiced at the skill of reading and interpreting body language have found that by following tried and trusted processes, they can be far more effective at deducing what people are really thinking. HERE IS A STORY from someone whose job it has been, in the interest of public safety, to always get the reading right: to examine behaviors, make an informed judgment from them, and then test how accurate his judgments are to uncover the truth of the matter. Read on and ask yourself how much you would trust your current body language reading skills in this situation, where stress and the stakes are high, in order to catch a murderer. Our colleague and friend Paul Nadeau is a former police detective with twenty-five years of investigative background, including homicide, and was a trained polygraph examiner—in other words, a professional lie detector. Paul describes the polygraph as an instrument that can detect the “slightest physiological changes in someone’s body; changes that can occur when someone is anxious giving a deceitful answer to a clear question.” As the polygraph examiner, Paul had to record and analyze the stress shown when answering questions to determine which ones the examinee may have lied about. Paul notes that, of course, individuals who agree to take a polygraph examination may indeed already be in quite an anxious state, particularly if they are being investigated by the police. Someone in Paul’s position understands that if a person being questioned is immediately attached to a polygraph, there is every chance of getting a “false positive” result—they might look like a liar, even when they are not. “Before hooking any suspect up to the instrument, I would first take some time to bring the examinee to a calmer state, putting them at ease. But that’s not all. I would also be watching every movement made by the examinee. Taking mental snapshots of that person’s physicality; looking for changes— especially as we move onto talking casually about the subject matter under investigation.” Paul shared with us one real-life situation, a homicide case where a gang member had been found in a rival gang’s territory stabbed to death, with three deep knife wounds to the heart. The theory was that the gang was sending a powerful message: Do not trespass on our turf—or else! The suspects were any and all of the rival gang’s members. Unsurprisingly, each gang member denied committing the murder, and each of them was requested by the police to take a polygraph test. It was Paul’s task to interview and give polygraph tests individually to the entire rival gang, any of whom could be the murderer, and all of whom denied any involvement. But then there was rival gang member number six, whom Paul describes as displaying body language that felt to him cocky and argumentative. “His chin was up and pushed out defiantly. He looked down his nose at me with a lopsided snarl. He hated all cops and had no respect for them.” Right off the bat, Paul, a veteran of interrogation and lie detection, put the suspect at ease by leaning in and confiding that he too felt much the same way about the officers he worked with. This tactic paid off in that the gang member warmed to him and they got to making small talk. Once they were involved in more relaxed banter, the gang member chatting about his family and girlfriends, Paul noted that he was at this point openly displaying a true smile, with no seemingly defensive postures. Paul was effectively establishing an understanding for himself of this individual’s most normal behavior in the interview situation when in a relaxed state. The crucial moment of body language interpretation happened when Paul purposely and abruptly shifted the conversation to the topic of the homicide. “His eyes left mine, his head turned away and his arms crossed. Although he answered ‘no’ to being involved, his verbal answers were inconsistent with what his body language was now broadcasting to me . the more I asked about his involvement, the more he leaned back into his chair— uncomfortably so.” This extreme change in body language was all Paul needed to see to have a strong suspicion that this guy was guilty. To test his theory, Paul confronted him with a powerful question: “You didn’t intend to kill him. You just wanted to teach him a lesson—‘Don’t come back!’ Otherwise, I’m sure you would have stabbed him much more than three times. Isn’t that the way it happened?” The gang member dropped his head into his hands and turned away from Paul, hiding his face. He confessed then and there to the murder and was later convicted in court. For Paul, taking mental snapshots of the behavior as he went through this interrogation, creating moments when a change in body language would stand out, as well as evaluating whether the suspect’s words were consistent with the body language he saw, and taking the moment to test his conjecture, made him a “human lie detector”—he had no need for the polygraph. Of course, this was Paul’s job as a law enforcement professional, an essential service in ensuring public safety. Paul was highly skilled and well practiced in his system for reading body language with accuracy. Wouldn’t it be incredibly useful if you could emulate Paul’s level of expertise in getting to the truth in your everyday life, without going through the detective training, and without coming across as an interrogator? For example, what if you understood as Paul did the suspect’s lopsided snarl, looking down his nose, jutting chin: All his facial expressions that indicate arrogance and contempt, a powerful feeling of being “above” Paul and the cops. Then, if you knew to empathize with the person and find their baseline of relaxed behavior for that situation, to instigate a change in the situation that might reveal a notable change in body language, and to—finally—test the findings for accuracy, eliciting displays of shame and even guilt—well, that skill would surely prove useful, instead of your acting solely on a hunch and going with a knee-jerk reaction to another’s body language. ALYSON SCHAFER, A HIGHLY RESPECTED parenting expert, told us a story that highlights just how important it is to put aside those knee-jerk reactions we can have to nonverbal behavior, to hold off on making wrong and possibly even catastrophic assumptions based on those reactions, instead taking the time to investigate situations more thoroughly to get to the truth.
Recommended publications
  • Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Talk “Like a Man”: Feminine Style in the Pursuit of Political Power DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Political Science by Jennifer J. Jones Dissertation Committee: Professor Kristen Monroe, Chair Professor Marty Wattenberg Professor Michael Tesler 2017 Chapter 4 c 2016 American Political Science Association and Cambridge University Press. Reprinted with permission. All other materials c 2017 Jennifer J. Jones TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vii CURRICULUM VITAE viii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION xi 1 Introduction 1 2 Theoretical Framework and Literature Review 5 2.1 Social Identity and Its Effect on Social Cognition . 6 2.1.1 Stereotypes and Expectations . 9 2.1.2 Conceptualizing Gender in US Politics . 13 2.2 Gender and Self-Presentation in US Politics . 16 2.2.1 Masculine Norms of Interaction in Institutional Settings . 16 2.2.2 Political Stereotypes and Leadership Prototypes . 18 2.3 The Impact of Political Communication in Electoral Politics . 22 2.4 Do Women Have to Talk Like Men to Be Considered Viable Leaders? . 27 3 Methods: Words are Data 29 3.1 Approaches to Studying Language . 30 3.2 Analyzing Linguistic Style . 34 3.2.1 Gendered Communication and the Feminine/Masculine Ratio . 37 3.2.2 Comparison with Other Coding Schemes . 39 3.3 Approaches to Studying Social Perception and Attitudes . 40 3.3.1 The Link Between Linguistic Style and Implicit Associations . 42 4 The Linguistic Styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013 45 4.1 The Case of Hillary Clinton .
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Manhattan/The Financial District
    05_773395 ch01.qxd 2/6/06 7:39 PM Page 7 • Walking Tour 1 • Lower Manhattan/The Financial District Start: Battery Park/U.S. Customs House. Subway: Take the 4 or 5 to Bowling Green, the 1 to South Ferry, or the R or W to Whitehall Street. Finish: African Burial Ground. Time: Approximately 3 hours. Best Time: Any weekday, when the wheels of finance are spin- ningCOPYRIGHTED and lower Manhattan is a maelstrom MATERIAL of activity. Worst Time: Weekends, when most buildings and all the finan- cial markets are closed. The narrow, winding streets of the Financial District occupy the earliest-settled area of 7 05_773395 ch01.qxd 2/6/06 7:39 PM Page 8 8 • Memorable Walks in New York Manhattan, where Dutch settlers established the colony of Nieuw Amsterdam in the early 17th century. Before their arrival, downtown was part of a vast forest, a lush hunting ground for Native Americans that was inhabited by mountain lions, bobcats, beavers, white-tailed deer, and wild turkeys. Hunters followed the Wiechquaekeck Trail, a path through the center that today is more often referred to as Broadway. This section of the city still centers on commerce, much as Nieuw Amsterdam did. Wall Street is America’s strongest symbol of money and power; bulls and bears have replaced the wild beasts of the forest, and conservatively attired lawyers, stockbrokers, bankers, and businesspeople have supplanted the Native Americans and Dutch who once traded otter skins and beaver pelts on these very streets. A highlight of this tour is the Financial District’s architec- ture, in which the neighborhood’s modern edifices and grand historical structures are dramatically juxtaposed: Colonial, 18th-century Georgian/Federal, and 19th-century neoclassical buildings stand in the shadow of colossal modern skyscrapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Property Tax Commitment Book
    Farmington Personal Property Tax Commitment Book - 2019 19.980 8/30/2019 8:10 AM 2019 Taxes Receivable Page 1 Account Name & Address Category Breakdown Assessment Exempt Total Tax 164 101 PARK AVENUE 31,600 0 31,600 631.37 PARTNERS INC 200 SUMMIT LAKE DRIVE MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 31,600 FLOOR 2 VALHALLA NY 10595 1356 615 WILTON ROAD 342 3D GAMES 12,000 0 12,000 239.76 133 BROADWAY SUITE 1 FURNITURE & FIXTURES 10,500 OTHER 1,500 FARMINGTON ME 04938 133 BROADWAY 471 3M COMPANY 0 0 0 0.00 C/O RYAN LLC PO BOX 4900 DEPT 575 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261 4900 357 82 HIGH STREET INC 3,500 3,500 0 0.00 103 SAWTELLE LANE FURNITURE & FIXTURES 2,700 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 400 FARMINGTON COMPUTER, copiers etc 400 ME 04938 103 SAWTELLE LANE 1036 A POOCHS PARADISE 6,200 0 6,200 123.88 KEENE, SHELLY & WHITE, FURNITURE & FIXTURES 2,200 JEANNE 442 FARMINGTON FALLS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 4,000 ROAD FARMINGTON ME 04938 442 FARMINGTON FALLS ROAD 368 ACME LAND SURVEYING LLC 49,900 45,200 4,700 93.91 108 FAIRBANKS ROAD FURNITURE & FIXTURES 13,800 SUITE 5 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 29,900 FARMINGTON ME 04938 COMPUTER, copiers etc 6,200 108 FAIRBANKS ROAD 665 ADAMS BROS MONUMENT CO 2,400 0 2,400 47.95 488 FARMINGTON FALLS MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 2,100 ROAD OTHER 300 FARMINGTON ME 04938 108 HIGH STREET Assessment Exempt Total Tax Page Totals: 105,600 48,700 56,900 1,136.87 Subtotals: 105,600 48,700 56,900 1,136.87 Farmington Personal Property Tax Commitment Book - 2019 19.980 8/30/2019 8:10 AM 2019 Taxes Receivable Page 2 Account Name & Address Category Breakdown Assessment Exempt
    [Show full text]
  • RECEIVED 7012 SEP 14 Pm I
    RECEIVED 7012 SEP 14 pM i ATTORNEYS AT LAW Molly O'Leary lU i-: 1iSSOj Tel: 208-938-7900 Fax: 208-938-7904 [email protected] P.O. Box 7218 Boise, ID 83707 - 515 N. 27th St. Boise, ID 8370 14 September 2012 Ms. Jean Jewell Hand Delivered Commission Secretary Idaho Public Utilities Commission 472 W. Washington Al l - I Boise, ID 83702 RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT APPLICATION OF AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MOUNTAIN STATES, INC. AND AT&T CORP. TO AMEND CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY NO. 295 TO REFLECT MERGER OF THE APPLICANTS Dear Ms. Jewell: Enclosed please find the above-referenced JOINT APPLICATION for filing on behalf of AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MOUNTAIN STATES, INC. AND AT&T CORP. We have enclosed an original and seven (7) copies, as well as an additional copy to be file-stamp for our records. Very truly yours, Molly ' ry Ric dso O'Leary, PLLC End. Molly O'Leary (ISB No. 4996) RICHARDSON & O'LEARY, PLLC 1 1 2 515 N. 27th Street Boise, Idaho 83702 Telephone: (208) 938-7900 Fax: (208) 938-7904 E-mail: [email protected] Attorneys for AT&T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc. and AT&T Corp. BEFORE THE IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE JOINT ) APPLICATION OF AT&T ) CASE NO. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MOUNTAIN) STATES, INC. AND AT&T CORP. TO ) JOINT APPLICATION TO AMEND AMEND CERTIFICATE ) CERTIFICATE OF PUBLIC OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND ) CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY NECESSITY NO. 295 TO REFLECT ) No. 295 MERGER OF THE APPLICANTS ) AT&T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc., (hereinafter "AT&T Comm.") and AT&T Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype ∗ Amy J
    Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2005, pp. 267--285 This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype ∗ Amy J. C. Cuddy Princeton University Michael I. Norton Massachusetts Institute of Technology Susan T. Fiske Princeton University Americans stereotype elderly people as warm and incompetent, following from perceptions of them as noncompetitive and low status, respectively. This article extends existing research regarding stereotyping of older people in two ways. First, we discuss whether the mixed elderly stereotype is unique to American culture. Data from six non-U.S. countries, including three collectivist cultures, demonstrate elderly stereotypes are consistent across varied cultures. Second, we investigate the persistence of the evaluatively-mixed nature of the elderly stereotype. In an experiment, 55 college students rated less competent elderly targets (stereotype- consistent) as warmer than more competent (stereotype-inconsistent) and control elderly targets. We also discuss the type of discrimination—social exclusion—that elderly people often endure. Said the little boy, “Sometimes I drop my spoon.” Said the little old man, “I do that too.” The little boy whispered, “I wet my pants.” “I do that too,” laughed the little old man. Said the little boy, “I often cry.” The old man nodded, “So do I.” “But worst of all,” said the boy, “it seems Grown-ups don’t pay attention to me.” And he felt the warmth of the wrinkled old hand. “I know what you mean,” said the little old man. Silverstein, 1981, “The Little Boy and the Old Man” ∗ Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Amy Cuddy, Psychology Depart- ment, Green Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 [e-mail: [email protected]].
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Empathy in Leadership
    +(,121/,1( Citation: 19 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 133 2011-2012 Provided by: Sponsored By: Thomas Jefferson School of Law Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Tue Dec 13 13:37:36 2016 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information Implementing Grutter's Diversity Rationale: Diversity and Empathy in Leadership REBECCA K. LEE* ABSTRACT This Article examines the role of leadershipin implementing the diversity rationale affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Grutter v. Bollinger and argues that greater di- versity and empathy are needed for effective leadership in diverse settings. In Grutter, the Court held that the University of Michigan Law School's use of race in selecting stu- dents for admission did not violate the Constitution'sEqual Protection Clause. In so do- ing, the Court affirmed Justice Powell's diversity rationaleas expressed in an earlier case, Regents of University of California v. Bakke, in which he noted that " 'the nation's future depends upon leaders trained through wide exposure' to the ideas and mores of students as diverse as this Nation of many peoples." By endorsing this diversity justifi- cation, the Grutter Court acknowledged the interdependent relationship between diversi- ty and leadership. The Court, however, did not describe the specific skills needed to lead in diverse environments and how such skills may be developed at school and afterward in the workplace.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grouplens Perspective
    From: AAAI Technical Report WS-98-08. Compilation copyright © 1998, AAAI (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved. RecommenderSystems: A GroupLensPerspective Joseph A. Konstan*t , John Riedl *t, AI Borchers,* and Jonathan L. Herlocker* *GroupLensResearch Project *Net Perceptions,Inc. Dept. of ComputerScience and Engineering 11200 West78th Street University of Minnesota Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN55455 Minneapolis, MN55344 http://www.cs.umn.edu/Research/GroupLens/ http://www.netperceptions.com/ ABSTRACT identifying sets of articles by keyworddoes not scale to a In this paper, wereview the history and research findings of situation in which there are thousands of articles that the GroupLensResearch project I and present the four broad contain any imaginable set of keywords. Taken together, research directions that we feel are most critical for these two weaknesses represented an opportunity for a new recommender systems. type of filtering, that would focus on finding which INTRODUCTION:A History of the GroupLensProject available articles matchhuman notions of quality and taste. The GroupLens Research project began at the Computer Such a system would be able to produce a list of articles Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW)Conference in 1992. that each user wouldlike, independentof their content. Oneof the keynote speakers at the conference lectured on a Wedecided to apply our ideas in the domain of Usenet his vision of an emerging information economy,in which news. Usenet screamsfor better information filtering, with most of the effort in the economywould revolve around hundreds of thousands of articles posted daily. Manyof the production, distribution, and consumptionof information, articles in each Usenet newsgroupare on the sametopic, so rather than physical goods and services.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Psychology As a Robust Science Dr Amy Orben Lent Term 2020 When
    Psychology as a Robust Science Dr Amy Orben Lent Term 2020 When: Lent Term 2020; Wednesdays 2-4pm (Weeks 0-6; 15.1.2020 – 26.2.2020), Mondays 2-4pm (Week 7; 2.3.2020) Where: Lecture Theatre, Experimental Psychology Department, Downing Site Summary: Is psychology a robust science? To answer such a question, this course will encourage you to think critically about how psychological research is conducted and how conclusions are drawn. To enable you to truly understand how psychology functions as a science, however, this course will also need to discuss how psychologists are incentivised, how they publish and how their beliefs influence the inferences they make. By engaging with such issues, this course will probe and challenge the basic features and functions of our discipline. We will uncover multiple methodological, statistical and systematic issues that could impair the robustness of scientific claims we encounter every day. We will discuss the controversy around psychology and the replicability of its results, while learning about new initiatives that are currently reinventing the basic foundations of our field. The course will equip you with some of the basic tools necessary to conduct robust psychological research fit for the 21st century. The course will be based on a mix of set readings, class discussions and lectures. Readings will include a diverse range of journal articles, reviews, editorials, blog posts, newspaper articles, commentaries, podcasts, videos, and tweets. No exams or papers will be set; but come along with a critical eye and a willingness to discuss some difficult and controversial issues. Core readings • Chris Chambers (2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Koel Chatterjee Phd Thesis
    Bollywood Shakespeares from Gulzar to Bhardwaj: Adapting, Assimilating and Culturalizing the Bard Koel Chatterjee PhD Thesis 10 October, 2017 I, Koel Chatterjee, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: 10th October, 2017 Acknowledgements This thesis would not have been possible without the patience and guidance of my supervisor Dr Deana Rankin. Without her ability to keep me focused despite my never-ending projects and her continuous support during my many illnesses throughout these last five years, this thesis would still be a work in progress. I would also like to thank Dr. Ewan Fernie who inspired me to work on Shakespeare and Bollywood during my MA at Royal Holloway and Dr. Christie Carson who encouraged me to pursue a PhD after six years of being away from academia, as well as Poonam Trivedi, whose work on Filmi Shakespeares inspired my research. I thank Dr. Varsha Panjwani for mentoring me through the last three years, for the words of encouragement and support every time I doubted myself, and for the stimulating discussions that helped shape this thesis. Last but not the least, I thank my family: my grandfather Dr Somesh Chandra Bhattacharya, who made it possible for me to follow my dreams; my mother Manasi Chatterjee, who taught me to work harder when the going got tough; my sister, Payel Chatterjee, for forcing me to watch countless terrible Bollywood films; and my father, Bidyut Behari Chatterjee, whose impromptu recitations of Shakespeare to underline a thought or an emotion have led me inevitably to becoming a Shakespeare scholar.
    [Show full text]
  • Policing Terrorism: an Executive’S Guide
    Policing Terrorism: An Executive’s Guide By Graeme R. Newman and Ronald V. Clarke This project was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number 2007-CK-WX-K008 awarded by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions contained herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. References to specific companies, products, or services should not be considered an endorsement by the authors or the U.S. Department of Justice. Rather, the references are illustrations to supplement discussion of the issues. The Internet references cited in this publication were valid as of July 2008. Given that URLs and web sites are in constant flux, neither the authors nor the COPS Office can vouch for their current validity. Policing Terrorism: An Executive’s Guide Letter from the Director Immediately after September 11, 2001, I convened a meeting with the heads of the five major executive law enforcement organizations in the United States. Those leaders told me that community policing was now more important than ever. Since then, the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (the COPS Office) on numerous occasions has brought together federal agencies, representatives from the private sector, law enforcement leaders from around the country, including campus public safety and tribal police, to explore creative solutions to violent crime and the persistent threat of terror. In each of these discussions we were continually brought back to the central role that community policing principles play in preventing and responding to the threats of terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 34, Issue 2, January 8, 2014 Published By: the Secretary Of
    Volume 34, Issue 2, January 8, 2014 The Central Register Published by: The Secretary of the Commonwealth, William Francis Galvin CENTRAL REGISTER Published weekly by William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Volume 34, Issue 2, January 8, 2014 DESIGNER SERVICES Request for Proposals 1 GENERAL CONTRACTS Invitation to Bid 6 CONTRACTORS OBTAINING PLANS/SPECIFICATIONS 35 CONTRACT AWARDS 42 LEASE, RENTAL, SALE, PURCHASE, ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY Notice of Proposed Disposition of Real Property 44 Office of Lease Management 49 MISCELLANEOUS Groundwater Discharge Permit - LIST OF DEBARRED CONTRACTORS DCAM 52 Attorney General 53 DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENTS DEBARMENT LIST 55 LIST OF DECERTIFIED CONTRACTORS DCAM 56 SUPPLIER DIVERSITY OFFICE Companies Certified - Companies Decertified - DESIGNER SELECTION BOARD - The Central Register is a state publication of public contracting opportunities, contract awards and related information received by the Secretary of the Commonwealth under the provisions of M.G.L. c. 9, § 20A. William Francis Galvin Secretary of the Commonwealth STATE BOOKSTORE State House, Room 116 Boston, MA 02133 (617) 727-2834 CENTRAL REGISTER SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION The Central Register is available in electronic form only. The total subscription price is $100 per year. You may subscribe to this publication on the following website: http://www.sec.state.ma.us/PublicationSubscriptionPublic/Login.aspx Please feel free to contact the State Bookstore with any questions that you may have regarding your subscription. Phone: (617) 727-2834 Email: [email protected] ** State Agencies Only** CHECKS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FROM STATE AGENCIES. State agencies are required to use the IE/ITI system. State agencies must complete the following information in order for their subscription to be processed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recommender System for Groups of Users
    PolyLens: A Recommender System for Groups of Users Mark O’Connor, Dan Cosley, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA {oconnor;cosley;konstan;riedl}@cs.umn.edu Abstract. We present PolyLens, a new collaborative filtering recommender system designed to recommend items for groups of users, rather than for individuals. A group recommender is more appropriate and useful for domains in which several people participate in a single activity, as is often the case with movies and restaurants. We present an analysis of the primary design issues for group recommenders, including questions about the nature of groups, the rights of group members, social value functions for groups, and interfaces for displaying group recommendations. We then report on our PolyLens prototype and the lessons we learned from usage logs and surveys from a nine-month trial that included 819 users. We found that users not only valued group recommendations, but were willing to yield some privacy to get the benefits of group recommendations. Users valued an extension to the group recommender system that enabled them to invite non-members to participate, via email. Introduction Recommender systems (Resnick & Varian, 1997) help users faced with an overwhelming selection of items by identifying particular items that are likely to match each user’s tastes or preferences (Schafer et al., 1999). The most sophisticated systems learn each user’s tastes and provide personalized recommendations. Though several machine learning and personalization technologies can attempt to learn user preferences, automated collaborative filtering (Resnick et al., 1994; Shardanand & Maes, 1995) has become the preferred real-time technology for personal recommendations, in part because it leverages the experiences of an entire community of users to provide high quality recommendations without detailed models of either content or user tastes.
    [Show full text]