DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuchjaree Saneyha Aus Prachinburi, Thailand

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuchjaree Saneyha Aus Prachinburi, Thailand Evaluation of Thailand’s Democracy: Steps to Consolidation Von der Fakultät Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften der Universität Stuttgart zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften (Dr. rer. pol.) genehmigte Abhandlung Vorgelegt von Nuchjaree Saneyha aus Prachinburi, Thailand Hauptberichter: Prof. Dr. Dieter Fuchs Mitberichter: Prof. Dr. Aurel Croissant Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 18. Mai 2015 Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Abteilung für Politische Theorie und Empirische Demokratieforschung der Universität Stuttgart 2015 Context Chapter Page Chapter I Introduction 1 Chapter II Political history and the structure of political regimes in Thailand 6 I Thailand’s Political History 6 II The structure of Thailand’s political regimes 16 Chapter III Theoretical framework 25 I Defective democracy theory by Wolfgang Merkel 25 II Consolidated democracy theory 38 Chapter IV Analyzing the partial regimes as defects of Thailand’s democracy 51 I Dimension of vertical legitimacy and control 60 II Dimension of constitutionalism and rule of law 76 III Dimension of effective agenda – control 84 Chapter V Analyzing the stateness problem as a defect of Thailand’s democracy 89 I The concept of the stateness problem 89 II The stateness problems in Thailand 95 Chapter VI Analyzing political culture and political institutions as defects of 152 Thailand’s democracy I Evaluation of Thailand’s democracy regarding the areas of political culture and 153 the design of political institutions as its defects II Comparative politics between Thailand and two democratic countries without 177 any doubts about their consolidation: Great Britain and Germany Chapter VII Conclusion and future outlook of Thailand’s democracy 207 Bibliography Curriculum Vitae Abbreviations PDRC The People’s Democratic Reform Committee PAD The People’s Alliance for Democracy UDD The United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship or the red shirt group NACC The National Anti-Corruption Commission EC The Election Commission TRT Thai Rak Thai PPP People’s Power Party PT Pheu Thai Party DP The Democrat Party The conservative power group This term in this thesis refers to royalists, the military, bureaucrats, the Democrat Party, some major business group, intellectuals, independent government agencies, middle class people from Bangkok and people who support the PDRC, despite living in the upper south The democratic support group This term in this thesis refers to 1. The United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship or the red shirt group 2. The democratic support group composed of various networks supporting democracy that have come into being amidst the political crisis since late 2013. Normally, these are formed by ordinary people, intellectuals, and students. Examples include The Defense of Democracy of AFDD, The Third Polar Group, The Enlightened Jurists Zusammenfassung Obwohl Thailand sein politisches System von der absoluten Monarchie zur konstitutionellen Monarchie bereits vor 82 Jahren im Zuge der Revolution von 1932 geändert hat, kämpft das Land immer noch mit der Demokratie und ihrer Konsolidierung. Bei dem bedeutendsten Problem, das in der Untersuchung behandelt wird, geht es um die unvollständige demokratische Transition, welche sich in der politische Kultur und den politischen Institutionen niederschlägt, damit diese als Unterstützer der Demokratie wirken können. Auch die anhaltende Krise, die seit Ende 2013 das Land beschäftigt, ist ein Resultat einer unvollständigen Konsolidierung. Diese Vorgänge haben dazu geführt, dass sich das Land nicht von seinen alten Machtstrukturen lösen kann. Nichtsdestotrotz führte der politische Aufstieg neuer Parteien mit Thaksin in der Hauptrolle dazu, dass die konservativen Königstreuen, das Militär und die älteste politische Partei, die Democrat Party, an Popularität verloren haben. Diese Entwicklung hat Thailand nun an den Rand des Zusammenbruchs gebracht beziehungsweise zur innerlichen Spaltung des Landes geführt. Die weitere Entwicklung der Demokratie in Thailand wird stark davon abhängen, ob das Problem mit demokratischen Mitteln gelöst werden kann, oder ob ein militärischer Putsch, eine Kompetenzüberschreitung der Judikativen oder eine ungewählte Regierung. Denkbar ist gar ein Bürgerkrieg. Diese Arbeit stellt positive Strategien und Schritte zur Konsolidierung vor, wie Thailand trotz seiner defekten Demokratie die Konsolidierung der Demokratie in Bezug auf Verhalten, Einstellung und Verfassung erreichen kann. Abstract Even though Thailand transformed its political system from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy as early as 82 years ago after the revolution of 1932, the country is still struggling with its democracy and consolidation. The most significant problem found in this research lies in its incomplete democratic transition that affects political culture and political institutions, precluding them from functioning as a support for democracy in Thailand. Furthermore, the ongoing crisis since late 2013 is one of the results of this imperfect consolidation, keeping Thailand in the grasp of the old circle of power. Nevertheless, the rise of a new political group (Thaksin and his party) has managed to win tremendous popularity, diminishing in turn the conservative power group, including the royalists, the military, and the nation’s oldest political party, the Democrat Party. A negative aspect of this is that Thailand has to confront a conflict that can lead to the country’s collapse or the stateness problem. Therefore, democracy in Thailand is in great peril if the country cannot solve the problem through democratic regimes, as the alternatives encompass such unpleasant possibilities as a coup d’état, a judicial coup, an unelected government, the people’s council or even a civil war. However, this research also presents such positive strategies that offer even as defective a democratic country as Thailand options for consolidating its democracy in terms of behavior, attitude, and constitution. Important here is the knowledge of all parties about their respective consolidation tasks. Evaluation of Thailand’s Democracy: Steps to Consolidation Page 1 Nuchjaree Saneyha Chapter I Introduction Research Question Main Questions: Is Thailand a consolidated democratic country? How far has Thailand’s democracy evolved right now? Specific Questions: What are the possible defects in Thailand’s democracy? To what degree is Thailand’s consolidation established? Research Problem This research concentrates to a great extent on the evaluation of Thailand’s democracy in accordance with the three main methods of its study: empirical, quantitative, and comparative. Each of the three methods used in this research highlight different aspects from other works on a similar topic, none of which focus on a historical analysis. It should be noted that the author fully accepts that understanding the political history of a country’s democracy is important in forming a whole picture of how democracy in a country is transformed and democratized. The present research significantly concentrates on a theoretical systematic analysis working with a number of statistics and indexes with regard to the two main theoretical frameworks: “defective democracy theory” by Wolfgang Merkel and “consolidation democracy theory,” dealing with the concept of democratic political culture by Linz and Stepan as well as Edeltraud Roller, Dieter Fuchs, and Krzysztof Zagorski. Furthermore, a comparative study will be undertaken, positioning Great Britain and Germany as counter examples of countries which do not doubt their democracy. The topic of an “Evaluation of Thailand’s Democracy” is of particular interest because of its close relation to the Thai people’s understanding of what democracy is. More and more, that emerges as a major problem of Thailand’s democracy. When asked whether Thailand is a democratic country, is it too easy to answer, “Yes, it is”? Indeed, Thailand has legally been a democratic country for the past 82 years. In 1932, Thailand converted its political system from absolute monarchy into a constitutional monarchy. On the outside, its institutions and procedures already present the trappings of democracy. Then, what is the problem? The problem is that democracy means more than just the transformation itself, along with implementing democratic institutions and procedures; instead, an important aspect of a democracy’s quality lies in the so-called “consolidation.” Diamond (1999, pp.18-19.) and Merkel et al. (2002, pp. 59-91.) define a defective democracy as follows Evaluation of Thailand’s Democracy: Steps to Consolidation Page 2 Nuchjaree Saneyha “The transformation with the implementation of democratic institutions and procedures is not a complete process of consolidation because if the stage of consolidation begins with the institutionalization of a liberal democracy, then the political systems that are in front of this threshold were no longer autocracies but they were not democracies either. These hybrid systems are called ‘Defective Democracies.’” The current political crisis shows even more that the Thai people are more and more confused about the definition and the content of democracy. The demonstrators from the People‘s Democratic Reform Committee or PDRC show a particular disdain for democracy. An example for such negative attitudes toward democracy from the PDRC is provided by its slogan, “Elections bring bad politicians into Thai politics.” This conviction is behind the PDRC’s attempts to prevent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Engagement of the Parliament in Thailand's Foreign Policy Process
    THE ENGAGEMENT OF THE PARLIAMENT IN THAILAND’S FOREIGN POLICY PROCESS: A NEW INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE BY MISS YOSSAWADEE TALEERAT AN INDEPENDENT STUDY SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC YEAR 2017 COPYRIGHT OF THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY Ref. code: 25595803040061HRK THE ENGAGEMENT OF THE PARLIAMENT IN THAILAND’S FOREIGN POLICY PROCESS: A NEW INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE BY MISS YOSSAWADEE TALEERAT AN INDEPENDENT STUDY SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF POLITICAL SCIENCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS FACULTY OF POLITICAL SCIENCE THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC YEAR 2017 COPYRIGHT OF THAMMASAT UNIVERSITY Ref. code: 25595803040061HRK (1) Independent Study Title THE ENGAGEMENT OF THE PARLIAMENT IN THAILAND‘S FOREIGN POLICY PROCESS: A NEW INSTITUTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE Author Miss Yossawadee Taleerat Degree Master of Political Science Major Field/Faculty/University International Relations Faculty of Political Science Thammasat University Thesis Advisor Asst. Prof. M. L. Pinitbhand Paribatra, Ph.D. Academic Years 2017 ABSTRACT According to Thai constitutions, parliament has legal duty and power to engage in foreign policy, but it was not until 2007 that Thai parliament could play much of an assertive role in the foreign policy process. Parliamentarians amended section 224 of the constitution of 1997 in order to control and check the cabinet and government in the matter of negotiations with other states and international organizations and to allow itself to engage in the process of foreign policy making. Through adding more stages in conduct of negotiation, parliament could be a part of consideration and approval of negotiation framework and final agreed text, not merely acknowledgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand's Red Networks: from Street Forces to Eminent Civil Society
    Southeast Asian Studies at the University of Freiburg (Germany) Occasional Paper Series www.southeastasianstudies.uni-freiburg.de Occasional Paper N° 14 (April 2013) Thailand’s Red Networks: From Street Forces to Eminent Civil Society Coalitions Pavin Chachavalpongpun (Kyoto University) Pavin Chachavalpongpun (Kyoto University)* Series Editors Jürgen Rüland, Judith Schlehe, Günther Schulze, Sabine Dabringhaus, Stefan Seitz The emergence of the red shirt coalitions was a result of the development in Thai politics during the past decades. They are the first real mass movement that Thailand has ever produced due to their approach of directly involving the grassroots population while campaigning for a larger political space for the underclass at a national level, thus being projected as a potential danger to the old power structure. The prolonged protests of the red shirt movement has exceeded all expectations and defied all the expressions of contempt against them by the Thai urban elite. This paper argues that the modern Thai political system is best viewed as a place dominated by the elite who were never radically threatened ‘from below’ and that the red shirt movement has been a challenge from bottom-up. Following this argument, it seeks to codify the transforming dynamism of a complicated set of political processes and actors in Thailand, while investigating the rise of the red shirt movement as a catalyst in such transformation. Thailand, Red shirts, Civil Society Organizations, Thaksin Shinawatra, Network Monarchy, United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship, Lèse-majesté Law Please do not quote or cite without permission of the author. Comments are very welcome. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the author in the first instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand White Paper
    THE BANGKOK MASSACRES: A CALL FOR ACCOUNTABILITY ―A White Paper by Amsterdam & Peroff LLP EXECUTIVE SUMMARY For four years, the people of Thailand have been the victims of a systematic and unrelenting assault on their most fundamental right — the right to self-determination through genuine elections based on the will of the people. The assault against democracy was launched with the planning and execution of a military coup d’état in 2006. In collaboration with members of the Privy Council, Thai military generals overthrew the popularly elected, democratic government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, whose Thai Rak Thai party had won three consecutive national elections in 2001, 2005 and 2006. The 2006 military coup marked the beginning of an attempt to restore the hegemony of Thailand’s old moneyed elites, military generals, high-ranking civil servants, and royal advisors (the “Establishment”) through the annihilation of an electoral force that had come to present a major, historical challenge to their power. The regime put in place by the coup hijacked the institutions of government, dissolved Thai Rak Thai and banned its leaders from political participation for five years. When the successor to Thai Rak Thai managed to win the next national election in late 2007, an ad hoc court consisting of judges hand-picked by the coup-makers dissolved that party as well, allowing Abhisit Vejjajiva’s rise to the Prime Minister’s office. Abhisit’s administration, however, has since been forced to impose an array of repressive measures to maintain its illegitimate grip and quash the democratic movement that sprung up as a reaction to the 2006 military coup as well as the 2008 “judicial coups.” Among other things, the government blocked some 50,000 web sites, shut down the opposition’s satellite television station, and incarcerated a record number of people under Thailand’s infamous lèse-majesté legislation and the equally draconian Computer Crimes Act.
    [Show full text]
  • How Immigrants Contribute to Thailand's Economy
    How Immigrants Contribute to Thailand’s Economy The effects of immigration on the Thai economy are considerable, as the number of Economy Thailand’s to Contribute Immigrants How immigrants has increased rapidly since the turn of the century. Immigrant workers now contribute to all economic sectors, and are important for the workforce in industrial How Immigrants Contribute sectors, such as construction and manufacturing, and in some service sectors, including private household services. Immigration in Thailand is associated with an improvement of labour market outcomes of the native-born population, and in particular appears to to Thailand’s Economy increase paid employment opportunities. Immigration is also likely to raise income per capita in Thailand, due to the relatively high share of the immigrant population which is employed and therefore contributes to economic output. Policies aiming to further diversify employment opportunities for immigrant workers could be benefi cial for the economic contribution of immigration. How Immigrants Contribute to Thailand’s Economy is the result of a project carried out by the OECD Development Centre and the International Labour Organization, with support from the European Union. The project aimed to analyse several economic impacts – on the labour market, economic growth, and public fi nance – of immigration in ten partner countries: Argentina, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, the Dominican Republic, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Rwanda, South Africa and Thailand. The empirical evidence stems from a combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses of secondary and in some cases primary data sources. Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264287747-en This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and statistical databases.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional & Parliamentary Information
    UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION CCoonnssttiittuuttiioonnaall && PPaarrlliiaammeennttaarryy IInnffoorrmmaattiioonn Half-yearly Review of the Association of Secretaries General of Parliaments Preparations in Parliament for Climate Change Conference 22 in Marrakech (Abdelouahed KHOUJA, Morocco) National Assembly organizations for legislative support and strengthening the expertise of their staff members (WOO Yoon-keun, Republic of Korea) The role of Parliamentary Committee on Government Assurances in making the executive accountable (Shumsher SHERIFF, India) The role of the House Steering Committee in managing the Order of Business in sittings of the Indonesian House of Representatives (Dr Winantuningtyastiti SWASANANY, Indonesia) Constitutional reform and Parliament in Algeria (Bachir SLIMANI, Algeria) The 2016 impeachment of the Brazilian President (Luiz Fernando BANDEIRA DE MELLO, Brazil) Supporting an inclusive Parliament (Eric JANSE, Canada) The role of Parliament in international negotiations (General debate) The Lok Sabha secretariat and its journey towards a paperless office (Anoop MISHRA, India) The experience of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies on Open Parliament (Antonio CARVALHO E SILVA NETO) Web TV – improving the score on Parliamentary transparency (José Manuel ARAÚJO, Portugal) Deepening democracy through public participation: an overview of the South African Parliament’s public participation model (Gengezi MGIDLANA, South Africa) The failed coup attempt in Turkey on 15 July 2016 (Mehmet Ali KUMBUZOGLU)
    [Show full text]
  • National Report of Thailand Convention on Nuclear
    NATIONAL REPORT OF THAILAND CONVENTION ON NUCLEAR SAFETY The 8th Review Meeting Office of Atoms for Peace Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation August, 2019 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Reporting Article by Article 2 Article 6 Existing Nuclear Installations . 2 Article 7 Legislative and Regulatory Framework . 6 Article 8 Regulatory Body . 19 Article 9 Responsibility of the License Holder . 24 Article 10 Priority to Safety . 27 Article 11 Financial and Human Resources . 28 Article 12 Human Factors . 30 Article 13 Quality Assurance . 31 Article 14 Assessment and Verification of Safety . 33 Article 15 Radiation Protection . 34 Article 16 Emergency Preparedness . 35 Article 17 Siting . 42 Article 18 Design and Construction . 45 Article 19 Operation . 48 3 Appendix 54 I. List of Abbreviations . 55 1 1. Introduction Thailand deposited the instrument of accession for the Convention on Nuclear Safety (CNS) with the Director General of IAEA on July 3, 2018. Thailand has been a contracting party since October 1, 2018. Currently, Thailand does not have any nuclear installations. Its latest Power Development Plan (PDP) which was issued in 2018 no longer contains nuclear energy in its energy mix. However, Thailand had once included a nuclear power with different capacities in its previous three versions of PDP from 2007 to 2015. Thailand has only one research reactor, the Thai Research Reactor-1/Modification 1 (TRR-1/M1), which has been operated since the nuclear energy was first introduced to Thailand in 1962. Currently TRR-1/M1 is under operation of Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology (TINT), which is a governmental public organization under Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Thailand: the Evolving Conflict in the South
    THAILAND: THE EVOLVING CONFLICT IN THE SOUTH Asia Report N°241 – 11 December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 II. STATE OF THE INSURGENCY .................................................................................... 2 A. THE INSURGENT MOVEMENT ....................................................................................................... 2 B. PATTERNS OF VIOLENCE .............................................................................................................. 4 C. MORE CAPABLE MILITANTS ........................................................................................................ 5 D. 31 MARCH BOMBINGS ................................................................................................................. 6 E. PLATOON-SIZED ATTACKS ........................................................................................................... 6 III. THE SECURITY RESPONSE ......................................................................................... 8 A. THE NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY FOR THE SOUTHERN BORDER PROVINCES, 2012-2014 ......... 10 B. SPECIAL LAWS ........................................................................................................................... 10 C. SECURITY FORCES ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Integrity Review of Thailand
    OECD Public Governance Reviews OECD Public Governance Reviews OECD Integrity Review of Thailand TOWARDS COHERENT AND EFFECTIVE INTEGRITY POLICIES OECD Integrity Review of Thailand TOWARDS COHERENT AND EFFECTIVE INTEGRITY POLICIES OECD Public Governance Reviews OECD Integrity Review of Thailand TOWARDS COHERENT AND EFFECTIVE INTEGRITY POLICIES This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2018), OECD Integrity Review of Thailand: Towards Coherent and Effective Integrity Policies, OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264291928-en ISBN 978-92-64-29191-1 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-29192-8 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-64-29193-5 (epub) Series: OECD Public Governance Reviews ISSN 2219-0406 (print) ISSN 2219-0414 (online) The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Photo credits: Cover ©lOvE lOvE/Shutterstock.com Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking on the Future of Asia and the Pacific the and Asia Future of the on Banking
    BANKING ON THE FUTURE OF ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Banking on the Future of Asia and the Pacifi c 50 Years of the Asian Development Bank This book is a history of the Asian Development Bank (ADB), a multilateral development bank established 50 years ago to serve Asia and the Pacifi c. Focusing on the region’s BANK DEVELOPMENT YEARS OF THE ASIAN economic development, the evolution of the international development agenda, and the story of ADB itself, Banking on the Future of Asia and the Pacifi c raises several key questions: What are the outstanding features of regional development to which ADB had to respond? How has the bank grown and evolved in changing circumstances? How did ADB’s successive leaders promote reforms while preserving continuity with the e orts of their predecessors? ADB has played an important role in the transformation of Asia and the Pacifi c over the past 50 years. As ADB continues to evolve and adapt to the region’s changing development landscape, the experiences highlighted in this book can provide valuable insight on how best to serve Asia and the Pacifi c in the future. Peter McCawley Peter “ADB is a child of genuine aspiration by people across BANKING ON the region and the establishment of ADB represents the spirit of regional cooperation.” THE FUTURE OF ASIA ADB President Takehiko Nakao AND THE PACIFIC YEARS OF THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Peter McCawley ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines www.adb.org ADB@50 History Book_COVER 6x9 - 2.6 cm spine.indd 1 6/15/2017 1:45:13 PM BANKING ON THE FUTURE OF ASIA AND THE PACIFIC 50 YEARS OF THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK Peter McCawley © 2017 Asian Development Bank 6 ADB Avenue, Mandaluyong City, 1550 Metro Manila, Philippines Tel +63 2 632 4444; Fax +63 2 636 2444 www.adb.org All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • November 5, 2020 Thai Enquirer Summary Political News • As The
    November 5, 2020 Thai Enquirer Summary Political News As the world holds its breath to see who will make it to becoming the next president of the United States, the results that are flowing in are making it look a little clearer. As of 09:00 Thai time Joe Biden was leading in every count that is being declared o 264:214 Domestically embattled Prime Minister Gen Prayut Chan-o-cha’s fate will be decided by the Constitutional Court early next month over his alleged unlawful occupation of an army residence amid constant calls from pro-democracy protesters that carried out months-long rallies. The Constitutional Court set December 2 to rule on a case against Gen Prayut for his prolonged stay in the army-owned residence. The court’s ruling is a result of the opposition’s petition filed by Pheu Thai Party and opposition leader Sompong Amornwiwat who asked the court to consider if Gen Prayut should be disqualified as prime minister and defence minister for remaining in a military house beyond retirement, breaking army regulations and Section 170(4), and Section 184 (3) of the constitution. Pro-democracy activists came out to reject a parliament-initiated plans to form a reconciliation committee, calling it a “political ploy to buy time,” and reiterated the demand for the immediate resignation of embattled Prime Minister Gen Prayuth Chan-o- cha. The protesters have spurned Gen Prayut’s request to join the so-called reconciliation committee appointed through the parliamentary process to resolve ongoing political problems. The proposed committee is poised to discuss the demands of the protesters in a bid to ease political tensions and restart the stalled process for charter amendment later this month.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Order: Constitutions and Human Rights in Thai Political History
    The Search for Order: Constitutions and Human Rights in Thai Political History Thanet Aphornsuvan, Ph.D Faculty of Liberal Arts, Thammasat University, Bangkok Thailand. In 1997 Parliament passed the new Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2540(AD.1997). The new Constitution reflected the crystallization of 67 years of Thai democracy. In this sense, the promulgation of the latest constitution was not simply another amendment to the previous constitutions, but it was a political reform that involved the majority of the people from the very beginning of its drafting. The whole process of constitution writing was also unprecedented in the history of modern Thai politics. Unlike most of the previous constitutions that came into being because those in power needed legitimacy, the Constitution of 1997 was initiated and called for by the citizens who wanted a true and democratic regime transplanted on to Thai soil. This popular demand, fueled by the latest uprising in May 1992 against the military- controlled government, led to the election of the Constitution Drafting Assembly to rewrite the new constitution according to the wishes of the people. To make this Constitution closer to the wishes and aspirations of the people, the Constitution Drafting Assembly organized public hearings to enable concerned citizens and groups to air their opinions on a variety of topics and subjects crucial to the working and efficiency of the Constitution. Finally the new and first popular Constitution was submitted to Parliament with strong support from people of all walks. Its submission was followed by long debates and objections from certain leading members of the House who feared it was overly liberal in its strong support of human rights and liberties of the people.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Participation in Adjudication in Thailand
    PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ADJUDICATION IN THAILAND Peerapong Pareerurk＊ I. INTRODUCTION The judicial power is an integral part of state sovereignty, separated from the legislative and the executive power. Exercise of the judicial power shall be in accordance with the rule of law. Under section 3 of the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560 (A.D. 2017), “Sovereign power belongs to the Thai people. The King as Head of State shall exercise such power through the National Assembly, the Council of Ministers and the Courts in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution. The National Assembly, the Council of Ministers, Courts, Independent Organs and State agencies shall perform duties in accordance with the Constitution, laws and the rule of law for the common good of the nation and the happiness of the public at large”. Therefore, a judge must adjudicate any cases in reliance on the rule of law. Generally speaking, a judge shall consistently comprehend the equal protection of law and equality before the law. Moreover, the court must allow the public access to fair trials and to be able to bring up any evidence to prove oneʼs innocence. The verdict of the court must be effective, fast and fair. Consequently, it is essential that all rights and freedoms of each individual are protected by laws. As such, each individual must have a chance to participate in the process of judgement to the fullest possible extent as long as it does not negatively impact the independent discretion of the judge. II. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ADJUDICATION UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE KINGDOM OF THAILAND Unfortunately, the latest constitution of Thailand, the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, B.E.
    [Show full text]