DOCSLIB.ORG

Parasites of the American White Pelican

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Parasites of the American White Pelican University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2005 Parasites of the American White Pelican Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, [email protected] Stephen S. Curran Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Parasitology Commons Overstreet, Robin M. and Curran, Stephen S., "Parasites of the American White Pelican" (2005). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 421. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/421 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Book for Press.qxp 2/28/05 3:29 PM Page 31 Gulf and Caribbean Research Vol 17, 31–48, 2005 Manuscript received November 3, 2004; accepted January 7, 2005 PARASITES OF THE AMERICAN WHITE PELICAN Robin M. Overstreet and Stephen S. Curran Department of Coastal Sciences, The University of Southern Mississippi, PO Box 7000, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39566 USA, E-mail [email protected] ABSTRACT Metazoan symbionts, including parasites, infecting the American white pelican (AWP) Pelecanus ery- throrhynchos comprise a list of 75 species, 7 of which are new host records. Several new geographic records are also presented, but generally these have a low value because of the migratory nature of the bird. Evidence suggests that some parasites, mostly flies and other arthropods but also nematodes and digeneans, produce detrimental behavioral or pathologic changes in the AWP. Some of the arthropods transmit microbial agents to the pelican. Two digeneans that have the AWP as a definitive host harm and even kill their catfish intermediate host, especially in aquaculture, and another causes abnormalities and mortality in amphibians. Some of the arthropods with low host- specificity can potentially transmit harmful microbial agents to humans and domestic animals. A few avian blood- flukes, intestinal flukes, and nematodes can potentially cause “swimmers itch,” gastroenteritis, and “anisakiasis,” respectively, in humans. Because of the life cycles of some helminths, presence of those worms can provide an indi- cation as to the dietary items of a specific pelican individual, where the individual has been, and how long it has been present in an area. Feather mites, lice, and diplostomoid digeneans serve as good parasites to indicate phylo- genetic relationships among different pelican species as well as relationships among the Pelecanidae and other fam- ilies such as the Sulidae. INTRODUCTION other host groups (e.g., Nadler and Hafner 1993) have strengthened our understanding of phylogeny by taking The American white pelican (AWP) Pelecanus ery- advantage of a variety of molecular approaches rather than throrhynchos serves as a host for numerous parasites, sev- performing strictly morphological analyses. Molecular eral of them recently or not previously reported. It serves techniques now provide additional useful tools to investi- as an acceptable host for many parasites because it gate a variety of parasitological problems. migrates over an extensive, defined, geographic range, all This article intends to provide a preliminary foray into the while feeding on a large variety of prey items. Those many of the AWP’s symbionts. “Symbiont” is a general prey species in turn serve as intermediate hosts for numer- term used here to encompass organisms that cover a com- ous parasites of the AWP, and many of those parasites as plete range of benefit and harm to a “host,” whether com- well as other symbionts without such complicated life monly referred to as a “parasite” or not (Overstreet 1978). cycles have co-evolved with the pelican. Consequently, They include organisms ranging from those with only a knowledge about the symbionts, especially the truly para- loose bond, such as a stable fly, to those “true” parasites sitic fauna, provides knowledge about the dynamics of the like the digenean Bolbophorus damnificus, which is spe- bird host during certain seasons, in certain regions, or cific to pelicans and exhibits a complicated life cycle in through time. Further, the AWP nests in groups, allowing which the intermediate hosts but not the pelican host are for easy transference of certain parasites among flock harmed. For purposes of this study, we usually refer to cohorts. each of the symbionts, regardless of the degree of host- Parasites of birds have been used before by several specificity, ability to harm a host, or other aspects of its researchers as indicators of the bird’s biology. For exam- association with the host, as a parasite. Some of these neg- ple, digeneans (Bartoli 1989) have indicated host diets, atively influence the bird, pose a potential public health prey preference, habitat where prey was eaten, and host risk, or provide useful biological information about the migration, even though digeneans and other parasites of pelican or its associates. The focus of this article is not fishes have been used more often than those of birds as meant to emphasize disease in the AWP resulting from par- well as used for additional categories of biological indica- asites but rather to show how parasites may play an impor- tions (e.g., Kabata 1963, Margolis 1963, MacKenzie 1983, tant role in understanding the biology of the bird. Lester 1990, Overstreet 1993, 1997). These articles cite criteria one should meet, which vary considerably, MATERIALS AND METHODS depending on the type of question the biological indicator should answer. Analysis of the phylogeny of bird parasites Data for this article have been gathered from prior col- as well as the co-evolution or host-switching with their lections made by the authors, specimens borrowed from hosts also have concerned lice (e.g., Page et al. 2004) and museums, and the literature. Collections consist of para- other parasites. That recent study and others involving sites from a relatively small number of the AWP. Those 31 Book for Press.qxp 2/28/05 3:29 PM Page 32 OVERSTREET AND CURRAN birds from the Mississippi-Louisiana region were shot or examined for parasites. And from these few individuals, died during their migration in conjunction with the often the site of infection has not been recorded. As a USDA/APHIS/ Wildlife Services, provided by the Wildlife result, we predict that many additional parasites infect the Rehabilitation & Nature Preservation Society, or collected AWP. For example, the brown pelican hosts the eimerian from aquaculture facilities. A single specimen was shot at coccidian protozoan Eimeria pelecani, but no protozoan the Summer Lake Wildlife Area, Oregon. We compare our other than a record of the coccidian Sarcocystis sp. in cysts data on the AWP with that collected or described from the in the pectoral muscle (Forrester and Spalding 2003) is brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) in Mississippi or known yet from the AWP. elsewhere. Parasites were removed from birds that were either freshly killed or birds that had been collected earli- DISCUSSION er and their alimentary tract frozen or fixed in alcohol or formalin. A few birds were examined thoroughly for para- Because some parasite identifications were based on sites in general, and specific organs of others were exam- single, few, or incomplete specimens and because some ined for certain species of parasites. Parasites were pre- identifications or infections required annotation, we men- pared using a variety of methods common in our laborato- tion a few relevant points. For the cestodes, no scolex was ry, including some described by Cable (1977), Crites and found among our tapeworm material of Paradilepis cf. Overstreet (1991), and Overstreet and Curran (2005). In caballeroi, so the species could not be identified, but, the most recent collections, we placed representative spec- based on the diagnosis by Forrester and Spalding (2002), imens in refrigerated 95% molecular grade ethanol or we assume P. caballeroi is probably correct. There exists directly into a –70 °C freezer for molecular studies. some debate about the status of species in Paradilepis and related genera. Parvitaenia heardi (= Glossocercus carib- RESULTS aensis by Scholz et al. 2002a) was described from the great blue heron (Ardea herodias) in South Carolina by Schmidt Appendix 1 lists most of the parasites about which we and Courtney (1973), with the brown pelican listed as an have knowledge and provides the site in the bird, the geo- accidental host. Rysavy and Macko (1971) reported graphic location of the infection, and principal references, Parvitaenia eudocimi (= Cyclustera ibisae by Scholz et al. when applicable. When we considered recorded parasite 2002a) from the brown pelican in Cuba as well as from the names to represent junior synonyms, we usually included white ibis (Eudocimus albus), for which it was named. the accepted names only. We also include in the table They described P. caballeroi from the double-crested cor- infections of parasites that we encountered for this study. morant (Phalacrocorax auritus). Additional well-fixed The list, plus a single unidentified coccidian protozoan,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brown Pelican
    118 Pelicans — Family Pelecanidae Brown Pelican Pelecanus occidentalis The failure of Brown Pelican nesting in southern California in the late 1960s and early 1970s, and its link to DDT, was a key case alerting the world to the unintended ill effects of persistent pesticides. Happily, once the release of DDT in the United States was banned, the pelicans recovered quickly. By the 1990s Brown Pelican was again common along San Diego County’s coast, numbers peaking in late summer and early fall. Nevertheless, the popu- lation remains fragile, and in California the Brown Pelican is still formally listed as an endangered spe- cies. The nesting colony nearest San Diego County is on Los Coronados Islands off Tijuana. Winter: The Brown Pelican is common all along San Diego County’s coast, as well as over the nearby ocean. Photo by Anthony Mercieca The largest numbers are where secure roost sites, on coastal bluffs or man-made structures, lie near good fish- ing, as at Torrey Pines State Reserve (N7; up to 218 on Diego Bay the pelican is more numerous north and west 26 December 1999, B. C. Moore), La Jolla (P7; 150 on 26 of the bridge than to the south of it, though many roost December 1998, L. and M. Polinsky), Point Loma (S7; 156 on the dikes of the salt works at the south end. on 18 December 1999, J. C. Worley), and North Island Brown Pelicans enter all lagoons open to the tide (S8; 302 on 18 December 1999, R. T. Patton). In San but, except at one site, are only casual on fresh water.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Risk Assessment for the Introduction of Eastern Wild Turkeys (Meleagris Gallopavo Silvestris) Into Nova Scotia
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Newsletters & Publications for April 2004 Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia A.S. Neimanis F.A. Leighton Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmccwhcnews Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Neimanis, A.S. and Leighton, F.A., "Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia" (2004). Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Newsletters & Publications. 48. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmccwhcnews/48 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre: Newsletters & Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Health risk assessment for the introduction of Eastern wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo silvestris) into Nova Scotia A.S. Neimanis and F.A. Leighton 30 April 2004 Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre Department of Veterinary Pathology Western College of Veterinary Medicine 52 Campus Dr. University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5B4 Tel: 306-966-7281 Fax: 306-966-7439 [email protected] [email protected] 1 SUMMARY This health risk assessment evaluates potential health risks associated with a proposed introduction of wild turkeys to the Annapolis Valley of Nova Scotia. The preferred source for the turkeys would be the Province of Ontario, but alternative sources include the northeastern United States from Minnesota eastward and Tennessee northward.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Ecology of the Brown Pelican in the Greater Puerto Rican Bank Region Jaime Agustin Collazo Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1985 Status and ecology of the brown pelican in the Greater Puerto Rican Bank region Jaime Agustin Collazo Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Collazo, Jaime Agustin, "Status and ecology of the brown pelican in the Greater Puerto Rican Bank region " (1985). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8684. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8684 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a manuscript sent to us for publication and microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to pho­ tograph and reproduce this manuscript, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. Pages in any manuscript may have indistinct print. In all cases the best available copy has been filmed. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. Manuscripts may not always be complete. When it is not possible to obtain missing pages, a note appears to indicate this. 2. When copyrighted materials are removed from the manuscript, a note ap­ pears to Indicate this.
    [Show full text]
  • And Wildlife, 1928-72
    Bibliography of Research Publications of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 1928-72 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE RESOURCE PUBLICATION 120 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS OF THE U.S. BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE, 1928-72 Edited by Paul H. Eschmeyer, Division of Fishery Research Van T. Harris, Division of Wildlife Research Resource Publication 120 Published by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife Washington, B.C. 1974 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Eschmeyer, Paul Henry, 1916 Bibliography of research publications of the U.S. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 1928-72. (Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Kesource publication 120) Supt. of Docs. no.: 1.49.66:120 1. Fishes Bibliography. 2. Game and game-birds Bibliography. 3. Fish-culture Bibliography. 4. Fishery management Bibliogra­ phy. 5. Wildlife management Bibliography. I. Harris, Van Thomas, 1915- joint author. II. United States. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. III. Title. IV. Series: United States Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Resource publication 120. S914.A3 no. 120 [Z7996.F5] 639'.9'08s [016.639*9] 74-8411 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OfTie Washington, D.C. Price $2.30 Stock Number 2410-00366 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS OF THE U.S. BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE, 1928-72 INTRODUCTION This bibliography comprises publications in fishery and wildlife research au­ thored or coauthored by research scientists of the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife and certain predecessor agencies. Separate lists, arranged alphabetically by author, are given for each of 17 fishery research and 6 wildlife research labora­ tories, stations, investigations, or centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Helmintos Parásitos De Fauna Silvestre En Las Costas De Guerrero, Oaxaca
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Estudios en Biodiversidad Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of 2015 Helmintos parásitos de fauna silvestre en las costas de Guerrero, Oaxaca y Chiapas, México Griselda Pulido-Flores Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, [email protected] Scott onkM s Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, [email protected] Jorge Falcón-Ordaz Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo Juan Violante-González Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biodiversidad Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Pulido-Flores, Griselda; Monks, Scott; Falcón-Ordaz, Jorge; and Violante-González, Juan, "Helmintos parásitos de fauna silvestre en las costas de Guerrero, Oaxaca y Chiapas, México" (2015). Estudios en Biodiversidad. 6. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biodiversidad/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Estudios en Biodiversidad by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Helmintos parásitos de fauna silvestre en las costas de Guerrero, Oaxaca y Chiapas, México Griselda Pulido-Flores, Scott Monks, Jorge Falcón-Ordaz, y Juan Violante-González Resumen La costa sureste del Pacífico en México es rica en biodiversidad, en parte por la posición en la intersección de las corrientes oceánicas ecuatoriales. Sin embargo, los helmintos son un grupo de organismos que ha sido poco estudiado en la región y los registros están en diversas fuentes de información.
    [Show full text]
  • Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus Idus
    REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE & AQUACULTURE https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2020.1822280 REVIEW Review and Meta-Analysis of the Environmental Biology and Potential Invasiveness of a Poorly-Studied Cyprinid, the Ide Leuciscus idus Mehis Rohtlaa,b, Lorenzo Vilizzic, Vladimır Kovacd, David Almeidae, Bernice Brewsterf, J. Robert Brittong, Łukasz Głowackic, Michael J. Godardh,i, Ruth Kirkf, Sarah Nienhuisj, Karin H. Olssonh,k, Jan Simonsenl, Michał E. Skora m, Saulius Stakenas_ n, Ali Serhan Tarkanc,o, Nildeniz Topo, Hugo Verreyckenp, Grzegorz ZieRbac, and Gordon H. Coppc,h,q aEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; bInstitute of Marine Research, Austevoll Research Station, Storebø, Norway; cDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Łod z, Poland; dDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia; eDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, USP-CEU University, Madrid, Spain; fMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey, UK; gDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK; hCentre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK; iAECOM, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada; jOntario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada; kDepartment of Zoology, Tel Aviv University and Inter-University Institute for Marine Sciences in Eilat, Tel Aviv,
    [Show full text]
  • Digenean Metacercaria (Trematoda, Digenea, Lepocreadiidae) Parasitizing “Coelenterates” (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa and Ctenophora) from Southeastern Brazil
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY, 53(1/2):39-45, 2005 DIGENEAN METACERCARIA (TREMATODA, DIGENEA, LEPOCREADIIDAE) PARASITIZING “COELENTERATES” (CNIDARIA, SCYPHOZOA AND CTENOPHORA) FROM SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL André Carrara Morandini1; Sergio Roberto Martorelli2; Antonio Carlos Marques1 & Fábio Lang da Silveira1 1Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo Departamento de Zoologia (Caixa Postal 11461, 05422-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) 2Centro de Estudios Parasitologicos y Vectores (CEPAVE) (2 Nro. 584 (1900) La Plata, Argentina) e-mails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] A B S T R A C T Metacercaria specimens of the genus Opechona (Trematoda: Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) are described parasitizing “coelenterates” (scyphomedusae and ctenophores) from Southeastern Brazil (São Paulo state). The worms are compared to other Opechona species occurring on the Brazilian coast, but no association has been made because only adult forms of these species have been described. Suppositions as to the possible transference of the parasites are made. R E S U M O Exemplares de metacercárias do gênero Opechona (Trematoda: Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) são descritos parasitando “celenterados” (cifomedusas e ctenóforos) no sudeste do Brasil (estado de São Paulo). Os vermes foram comparados a outras espécies de Opechona ocorrentes no litoral brasileiro, porém nenhuma associação foi realizada devido às demais espécies terem sido descritas a partir de exemplares adultos. São apresentadas suposições sobre as possíveis formas
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Coral Reef Fish: How Much Do We Know? with a Bibliography of Fish Parasites in New Caledonia
    Belg. J. Zool., 140 (Suppl.): 155-190 July 2010 Parasites of coral reef fish: how much do we know? With a bibliography of fish parasites in New Caledonia Jean-Lou Justine (1) UMR 7138 Systématique, Adaptation, Évolution, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57, rue Cuvier, F-75321 Paris Cedex 05, France (2) Aquarium des lagons, B.P. 8185, 98807 Nouméa, Nouvelle-Calédonie Corresponding author: Jean-Lou Justine; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. A compilation of 107 references dealing with fish parasites in New Caledonia permitted the production of a parasite-host list and a host-parasite list. The lists include Turbellaria, Monopisthocotylea, Polyopisthocotylea, Digenea, Cestoda, Nematoda, Copepoda, Isopoda, Acanthocephala and Hirudinea, with 580 host-parasite combinations, corresponding with more than 370 species of parasites. Protozoa are not included. Platyhelminthes are the major group, with 239 species, including 98 monopisthocotylean monogeneans and 105 digeneans. Copepods include 61 records, and nematodes include 41 records. The list of fish recorded with parasites includes 195 species, in which most (ca. 170 species) are coral reef associated, the rest being a few deep-sea, pelagic or freshwater fishes. The serranids, lethrinids and lutjanids are the most commonly represented fish families. Although a list of published records does not provide a reliable estimate of biodiversity because of the important bias in publications being mainly in the domain of interest of the authors, it provides a basis to compare parasite biodiversity with other localities, and especially with other coral reefs. The present list is probably the most complete published account of parasite biodiversity of coral reef fishes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Andean Condor: a Field Study ______
    _____________________________________ THE ANDEAN CONDOR: A FIELD STUDY _____________________________________ By: Jerry McGahan Box 71 Arlee, MT 59821 (406) 726-3480 [email protected] JerryMcGahan.com With photographs, field, and clerical assistance by: Libby Sale Dedicated to the Memory of Carlos Lehmann V Maria Koepcke Enrique Avila William Millie i Table of Contents PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDMENTS……………………………………………………… 1 1 THE STUDY .............................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 6 STUDY AREAS .............................................................................................................. 15 Colombia .............................................................................................................. 15 Cerro Illescas ....................................................................................................... 18 Paracas ................................................................................................................ 20 THE SUBJECT ................................................................................................................ 21 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................. 21 Description ........................................................................................................... 22
    [Show full text]
  • REVEALING BIOTIC DIVERSITY: HOW DO COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS INFLUENCE HUMAN SCHISTOSOMIASIS in a HYPERENDEMIC AREA Martina R
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Biology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 5-9-2018 REVEALING BIOTIC DIVERSITY: HOW DO COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS INFLUENCE HUMAN SCHISTOSOMIASIS IN A HYPERENDEMIC AREA Martina R. Laidemitt Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds Recommended Citation Laidemitt, Martina R.. "REVEALING BIOTIC DIVERSITY: HOW DO COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS INFLUENCE HUMAN SCHISTOSOMIASIS IN A HYPERENDEMIC AREA." (2018). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds/279 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Martina Rose Laidemitt Candidate Department of Biology Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Dr. Eric S. Loker, Chairperson Dr. Jennifer A. Rudgers Dr. Stephen A. Stricker Dr. Michelle L. Steinauer Dr. William E. Secor i REVEALING BIOTIC DIVERSITY: HOW DO COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS INFLUENCE HUMAN SCHISTOSOMIASIS IN A HYPERENDEMIC AREA By Martina R. Laidemitt B.S. Biology, University of Wisconsin- La Crosse, 2011 DISSERT ATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biology The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2018 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I thank my major advisor, Dr. Eric Samuel Loker who has provided me unlimited support over the past six years. His knowledge and pursuit of parasitology is something I will always admire. I would like to thank my coauthors for all their support and hard work, particularly Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelecanus Occidentalis) in Costa Rica
    First record of leucism in brown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) in Costa Rica Primer registro de leucismo en el pelícano pardo (Pelecanus occidentalis) en Costa Rica Roberto Vargas-Masís*1,2 & Pilar Arguedas-Rodríguez1,3 ABSTRACT Leucism in birds is rarely observed in the Pelecaniformes order and has not been recorded for the brown pelican (Pelecanus occidentalis) in Costa Rica. We describe an observation of a leucistic brown pelican with white plumage, pink coloration on the bill and feet, but normal color on the eyes. Leucism in birds is the most frequently reported color aberration and these cases present low survival rates for individuals. Although isolated cases occur in birds, these reports help determine the frequency of these events for spe- cific bird populations and species. Keywords: Leucism, brown pelican, plumage, albinism, Costa Rica. RESUMEN El leucismo en las aves se observa raramente en el orden Pelecaniformes y no ha sido registrado para el pe- lícano pardo (Pelecanus occidentalis) en Costa Rica. Describimos una observación de un pelícano marrón leucístico con plumaje blanco, coloración rosa en el pico y las patas, pero color normal en los ojos. El leu- cismo en las aves es la aberración de color más frecuentemente reportada y estos casos presentan tasas bajas de supervivencia para los individuos. Aunque se presentan casos aislados en aves, estos reportes permiten determinar la frecuencia de estos eventos en ciertas poblaciones y especies de aves. Palabras claves: Leucismo, pelícano pardo, plumaje, albinismo, Costa Rica. INTRODUCTION Birds obtain their coloration from pigments or refractive structures in feathers and skin (Yusti-Muñoz & Velandia-Perilla, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitic Helminths and Arthropods of Fulvous Whistling-Ducks (Dendrocygna Bicolor) in Southern Florida
    J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. 61(1), 1994, pp. 84-88 Parasitic Helminths and Arthropods of Fulvous Whistling-Ducks (Dendrocygna bicolor) in Southern Florida DONALD J. FORRESTER,' JOHN M. KINSELLA,' JAMES W. MERTiNS,2 ROGER D. PRICE,3 AND RICHARD E. TuRNBULL4 5 1 Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610, 2 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Veterinary Services Laboratories, P.O. Box 844, Ames, Iowa 50010, 1 Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, and 4 Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Okeechobee, Florida 34974 ABSTRACT: Thirty fulvous whistling-ducks (Dendrocygna bicolor) collected during 1984-1985 from the Ever- glades Agricultural Area of southern Florida were examined for parasites. Twenty-eight species were identified and included 8 trematodes, 6 cestodes, 1 nematode, 4 chewing lice, and 9 mites. All parasites except the 4 species of lice and 1 of the mites are new host records for fulvous whistling-ducks. None of the ducks were infected with blood parasites. Every duck was infected with at least 2 species of helminths (mean 4.2; range 2- 8 species). The most common helminths were the trematodes Echinostoma trivolvis and Typhlocoelum cucu- merinum and 2 undescribed cestodes of the genus Diorchis, which occurred in prevalences of 67, 63, 50, and 50%, respectively. Only 1 duck was free of parasitic arthropods; each of the other 29 ducks was infested with at least 3 species of arthropods (mean 5.3; range 3-9 species). The most common arthropods included an undescribed feather mite (Ingrassia sp.) and the chewing louse Holomenopon leucoxanthum, both of which occurred in 97% of the ducks.
    [Show full text]