DOCSLIB.ORG

Aerothermodynamic Cycle Design and Optimizatoin Method for Aicraft Engines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aerothermodynamic Cycle Design and Optimizatoin Method for Aicraft Engines AEROTHERMODYNAMIC CYCLE DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATOIN METHOD FOR AICRAFT ENGINES A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Sean T Ford In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Science in the School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Sean T Ford AEROTHERMODYNAMIC DESIGN AND OPTIMIZATION METHOD FOR AIRCRAFT ENGINES Approved by: Dr. Dimitri Mavris, Advisor School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Brian Kestner GE Aviation Dr. Jeff Schutte School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: 31 July 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people I would like to acknowledge, who without their support I would not have come so far. First is my advisor Professor Dimitri Mavris who provided me with the opportunity to pursue this thesis and has guided me on many aspects of not just this thesis but my education. His tireless leadership and mentorship has been a great source of encouragement. He has taught me not only the skills and knowledge to be a better engineer, but a better overall person. I would also like to acknowledge the community at ASDL including Dr. Jeff Schutte. They have been an amazing source of help and guidance throughout this process. And last but most definitely not least I would like to acknowledge Dr. Brian Kestner. He has been a constant source of help through this thesis and my education at Georgia Tech. He has been instrumental in helping me push further than I thought possible. Without his help and occasional kicks in the right direction I would not have made it so far. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................... ix NOMENCLATURE ...................................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER 1: Introduction and Motivation .................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Need for a New Engine Architecture ................................................................. 2 1.2 The Need for an Optimization Method ..................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2: Background Information.......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Variable Cycle Engines and Variable Geometry ...................................................... 7 2.1.1 VCE History.............................................................................................................. 7 2.1.2 Variable Geometry .................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2.1 Variable Area Bypass Injector ........................................................................... 8 2.1.2.2 Variable Area Nozzle ........................................................................................ 9 2.1.2.3 Variable Inlet Guide Vanes ............................................................................. 10 2.1.2.4 Variable Nozzle Area Turbine ......................................................................... 11 2.2 Current Paradigms in Aero Propulsion Design and Cycle Analysis ....................... 12 2.3 Optimization Techniques for an Engine Model ...................................................... 15 2.4 Research Questions and Hypotheses ...................................................................... 19 CHAPTER 3: Research Formulation ............................................................................................ 23 3.1 Solver Based Optimization Overview .................................................................... 23 iv 3.1.1 SBO Process............................................................................................................ 25 3.1.1.1 Objective Identification and Definition of Optimum ...................................... 26 3.1.1.2 Setup ................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.1.3 Execution ......................................................................................................... 28 3.1.2 MDP ........................................................................................................................ 28 3.1.2.1 Requirements and Technology Definition Phase ............................................ 28 3.1.2.2 Setup Phase ...................................................................................................... 28 3.1.2.3 Execution Phase ............................................................................................... 29 3.1.2.4 MDP Initial Iterate ........................................................................................... 29 3.2 Theoretical Framework ........................................................................................... 30 3.2.1 Thrust and Efficiency .............................................................................................. 31 3.2.2 Cycle Solver: Modified Newton-Raphson Method ................................................ 35 3.2.3 Local Linear Approximation................................................................................... 38 3.2.4 Mathematical Treatment of Optimization Problem ................................................ 39 3.2.5 Practical Treatment of Optimization Problem ........................................................ 40 3.3 Assumptions and Limitations ................................................................................. 42 3.4 OMDP Optimization Strategies .............................................................................. 43 3.5 Procedure ................................................................................................................ 44 CHAPTER 4: Implementation ...................................................................................................... 46 4.1 Modeling Environment ........................................................................................... 46 4.2 SBO Setup for NPSS .............................................................................................. 47 4.3 Selection of Objective Function and Optimization Variables ................................ 49 4.4 Model Concepts ...................................................................................................... 50 4.4.1 Analytical Model Description and Solver Setup .................................................... 50 4.4.2 SFTF Engine Model Description and Solver Setup ................................................ 53 v 4.4.2.1 Solver Setup for SBO with SDP ...................................................................... 55 4.4.2.2 Solver Setup for OMDP .................................................................................. 56 CHAPTER 5: Results ................................................................................................................... 60 5.1 Experiments 1-3, Solver Based Optimization Proof of Concept ............................ 60 5.1.1 Setup and Implementation ................................................................................... 60 5.1.2 Results ................................................................................................................. 61 5.2 Experiment 4, SDP Engine Model Optimization .................................................... 66 5.2.1 Setup and Implementation ................................................................................... 67 5.2.2 Results ................................................................................................................. 68 5.3 Experiments 5-10: Engine Model Optimization with SBO and OMDP ................. 71 5.3.1 Experiment 5: Intra-point Optimization, Single Variable, Single Objective .......... 73 5.3.1.1 Results ............................................................................................................. 73 5.3.2 Experiment 6 Cross-point Optimization, Single Variable, Single Objective ......... 76 5.3.3 Experiment 7: Intra-point Optimization, Multi-variable, Multi-objective.............. 80 5.3.4 Experiment 8: Cross-point Optimization, Multi-variable, Single Objective .......... 86 5.3.4.1 Results ............................................................................................................. 86 5.3.5 Experiment 9: Cross-point Optimization, Single Variable, Multi-objective .......... 90 5.3.5.1 Results ............................................................................................................. 91 5.3.6 Experiment 10: Optimization Starting Point Study ................................................ 91 CHAPTER 6: Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 96 6.1 Research Questions and Hypotheses ...................................................................... 96 6.2 Research Contributions ........................................................................................... 97 6.3 Recommendations for Future Work.......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerospace Engine Data
    AEROSPACE ENGINE DATA Data for some concrete aerospace engines and their craft ................................................................................. 1 Data on rocket-engine types and comparison with large turbofans ................................................................... 1 Data on some large airliner engines ................................................................................................................... 2 Data on other aircraft engines and manufacturers .......................................................................................... 3 In this Appendix common to Aircraft propulsion and Space propulsion, data for thrust, weight, and specific fuel consumption, are presented for some different types of engines (Table 1), with some values of specific impulse and exit speed (Table 2), a plot of Mach number and specific impulse characteristic of different engine types (Fig. 1), and detailed characteristics of some modern turbofan engines, used in large airplanes (Table 3). DATA FOR SOME CONCRETE AEROSPACE ENGINES AND THEIR CRAFT Table 1. Thrust to weight ratio (F/W), for engines and their crafts, at take-off*, specific fuel consumption (TSFC), and initial and final mass of craft (intermediate values appear in [kN] when forces, and in tonnes [t] when masses). Engine Engine TSFC Whole craft Whole craft Whole craft mass, type thrust/weight (g/s)/kN type thrust/weight mini/mfin Trent 900 350/63=5.5 15.5 A380 4×350/5600=0.25 560/330=1.8 cruise 90/63=1.4 cruise 4×90/5000=0.1 CFM56-5A 110/23=4.8 16
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Afterburners
    2. AFTERBURNERS 2.1 Introduction The simple gas turbine cycle can be designed to have good performance characteristics at a particular operating or design point. However, a particu­ lar engine does not have the capability of producing a good performance for large ranges of thrust, an inflexibility that can lead to problems when the flight program for a particular vehicle is considered. For example, many airplanes require a larger thrust during takeoff and acceleration than they do at a cruise condition. Thus, if the engine is sized for takeoff and has its design point at this condition, the engine will be too large at cruise. The vehicle performance will be penalized at cruise for the poor off-design point operation of the engine components and for the larger weight of the engine. Similar problems arise when supersonic cruise vehicles are considered. The afterburning gas turbine cycle was an early attempt to avoid some of these problems. Afterburners or augmentation devices were first added to aircraft gas turbine engines to increase their thrust during takeoff or brief periods of acceleration and supersonic flight. The devices make use of the fact that, in a gas turbine engine, the maximum gas temperature at the turbine inlet is limited by structural considerations to values less than half the adiabatic flame temperature at the stoichiometric fuel-air ratio. As a result, the gas leaving the turbine contains most of its original concentration of oxygen. This oxygen can be burned with additional fuel in a secondary combustion chamber located downstream of the turbine where temperature constraints are relaxed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supersonic Fan Equipped Variable Cycle Engine for a Mach 2.7 Supersonic Transport
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Applied Engineering and Sciences Scholarship Applied Engineering and Sciences 8-22-1985 A Supersonic Fan Equipped Variable Cycle Engine for a Mach 2.7 Supersonic Transport Theodore S. Tavares University of New Hampshire, Manchester, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/unhmcis_facpub Recommended Citation Tavares, T.S., “A Supersonic Fan Equipped Variable Cycle Engine for a Mach 2.7 Supersonic Transport,” NASA-CR-177141, 1986. This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Applied Engineering and Sciences at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Applied Engineering and Sciences Scholarship by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19860019474 2018-07-25T19:53:49+00:00Z ^4/>*>?/ GAS TURBINE LABORATORY DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139 A FINAL REPORT ON NASA GRANT NAG-3-697 entitled A SUPERSONIC FAN EQUIPPED VARIABLE CYCLE ENGINE FOR A MACH 2.7 SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT by T. S. Tavares prepared for NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH 44135 (NASA-CB-177141) A SDPEBSCNIC FAN EQUIPPED N86-28946 VARIABLE CYCLE ENGINE.JOB A MACH 2.? SDPEESONIC TBANSPOBT Final Report (Massachusetts Inst. of Tech.) 107 p Unclas CSCL 21E G3/07 43461 August 22, 1985 A SUPERSONIC FAN EQUIPPED VARIABLE CYCLE ENGINE FOR A HACK 2.7 SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT by Theodore Sean Tavares A SUPERSONIC FAN EQUIPPED VARIABLE CYCLE ENGINE FOR A MACH 2.7 SUPERSONIC TRANSPORT by THEODORE SEAN TAVARES ABSTRACT A design stud/ was carried out to evaluate the concept of a variable cycle turbofan engine with an axially supersonic fan stage as powerplant for a Mach 2.7 supersonic transport.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Propulsion
    Aircraft Design Lecture 2: Aircraft Propulsion G. Dimitriadis and O. Léonard APRI0004-­1, Aerospace Design Project, Lecture 4 1 Introduction • A large variety of propulsion methods have been used from the very start of the aerospace era: – No propulsion (balloons, gliders) – Muscle (mostly failed) – Steam power (mostly failed) – Piston engines and propellers – Rocket engines – Jet engines – Pulse jet engines – Ramjet – Scramjet APRI0004-­1, Aerospace Design Project, Lecture 4 2 Gliding flight • People have been gliding from the-­ mid 18th century. The Albatross II by Jean Marie Le Bris-­ 1849 Otto Lillienthal , 1895 APRI0004-­1, Aerospace Design Project, Lecture 4 3 Human-­powered flight • Early attempts were less than successful but better results were obtained from the 1960s onwards. Gerhardt Cycleplane (1923) MIT Daedalus (1988) APRI0004-­1, Aerospace Design Project, Lecture 4 4 Steam powered aircraft • Mostly dirigibles, unpiloted flying models and early aircraft Clément Ader Avion III (two 30hp steam engines, 1897) Giffard dirigible (1852) APRI0004-­1, Aerospace Design Project, Lecture 4 5 Engine requirements • A good aircraft engine is characterized by: – Enough power to fulfill the mission • Take-­off, climb, cruise etc. – Low weight • High weight increases the necessary lift and therefore the drag. – High efficiency • Low efficiency increases the amount fuel required and therefore the weight and therefore the drag. – High reliability – Ease of maintenance APRI0004-­1, Aerospace Design Project, Lecture 4 6 Piston engines • Wright Flyer: One engine driving two counter-­ rotating propellers (one port one starboard) via chains. – Four in-­line cylinders – Power: 12hp – Weight: 77 kg APRI0004-­1, Aerospace Design Project, Lecture 4 7 Piston engine development • During the first half of the 20th century there was considerable development of piston engines.
    [Show full text]
  • An Online Performance Calculator for Ramjet, Turbojet, Turbofan, and Turboprop Engines
    An Online Performance Calculator for Ramjet, Turbojet, Turbofan, and Turboprop Engines Evan P. Warner∗ Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA This paper documents the theory, equations, and assumptions behind an HTML-based online performance calculator for ramjet, turbojet, turbofan, and turboprop engines. Based on inputs of design parameters, flight con- ditions, and engine parameters, the specific thrust (()), thrust specific fuel consumption ()(), propulsive efficiency ([ ?), thermal efficiency ([Cℎ), and overall efficiency ([0) will be output for the engine of interest. Several sample cases are analyzed to verify the functionality of the calculator. These sample cases are derived from engines associated with Virginia Tech, which include: Pratt & Whitney’s PT6A-20 and JT15D-1, Honeywell’s TFE731-2B, and the Rolls Royce Trent 1000. With the help of this calculator, students will now be able to verify their air-breathing jet engine performance value calculations. This calculator is available here. I. Nomenclature "0 = Ambient Mach Number 2 ?1 = Specific Heat of the Burner W0 = Ambient Specific Heat Ratio 2 ?C = Specific Heat of the Turbine W3 = Diffuser Specific Heat Ratio 2 ? 5 = Specific Heat of the Fan W2 = Compressor Specific Heat Ratio )0 = Ambient Static Temperature W1 = Burner Specific Heat Ratio ?0 = Ambient Static Pressure WC = Turbine Specific Heat Ratio ?4 = Exit Static Pressure W= = Nozzle Specific Heat Ratio '08A = Gas Constant for Air W 5 = Fan Specific Heat Ratio '?A>3 = Gas Constant for the Products of Fuel/Air Mixture W= 5 = Fan Nozzle
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling and Simulation of the Revolutionary Turbine Accelerator
    Announcement “This final year project was an exam. Commentary made during the presentation is not taken into account.” "Deze eindverhandeling was een examen. De tijdens de verdediging geformuleerde opmerkingen werden niet opgenomen". Preface Here I would like to thank everyone who made a contribution to my thesis. Also to all the people I forgot or do not call by name below. First of all I would like to thank my both VKI promoters. Guillermo Paniagua and Victor Fernández Villacé for their guidance, theoretical support and the help finding the exact information I was searching for. Also thanks to my KHBO promoter, Wim Vanparys who also gave me support, in addition to his clear view on the project and future considerations. Second I would like to say thank you to JeanFrançois Herbiet for his EcosimPro help, in which Victor also made his contribution, and for the information about the conical inlet and its implementation. Without the IT help of Olivier Jadot there would be no EcosimPro at the VKI, on my computer and it definitely would not be accessible at home. Also the people of the VKI library deserve a great thank you for delivering the requested papers as soon as possible which were essential to understand the working principle of the RTA. Next, a thank you to my VKI-colleagues, Piet Van den Ecker, Marylène Andre and Maarten De Moor for the great time and discussions about the occurring problems. Most of the time they helped me, without them knowing it, determining and resolving the problems. Of course to all the others as well, to keep up the spirit in the little room were we spent our time.
    [Show full text]
  • ITU Beengine for a Next Generation Trainer
    ITU BeEngine for a Next Generation Trainer AIAA 2015 - 2016 Undergraduate Engine Design Competition Team ITU BeEngine Proposal Advisor : Assoc. Prof. Dr. Onur TUNÇER Team ITU BeEngine Olcay SARI Orçun BULAT ABSTRACT The aim of this ITU BeEngine Design Project is to design a conceptual new engine to replace GE J-85-5A engine of T-38 supersonic jet trainer with better fuel consumption, performance and weight properties. New designed BeEngine is capable of providing the required thrust values with an improved fuel consumption values. On the other hand, since the purpose of T-38 is to train pilots for 5th generation fighter aircrafts, better performance properties are included into new engine. With the involvement of latest materials properties, such as TiAl alloys and CMC (Ceramic Matrix Composites), engine weight is decreased significantly for a similar but a little smaller size. Under the mixed flow low bypass turbofan category, new engine pushes the limits of overall pressure ratio of 16 through 8 compressor stages with a slightly higher bypass ratio of 1.2. Counter rotating 2-spool new engine is aimed to provide optimum values for prepared mission profile for trainer aircrafts while providing extended range of ≈1800nmi. With all ultimate technology limits, each spool is supported by a single stage turbine. Additionally, BeEngine is quite flexible on the afterburner operations thanks to its higher bypass ratio. Apart from achieving the required afterburner thrust values, it is also possible to increase maximum thrust limit in order to compete with other ultimate supersonic jet trainers in market. Furthermore, with new designed convergent-divergent nozzle with vectoring for allowing extra maneuverability for training purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Innovative Airbreathing Propulsion Concepts for Access to Space
    r I I 2 00/Z20/03 NASA/TM-2001-210564 S 5lf'<f5 LCfj ( I I ~ Innovative Airbreathing Propulsion Concepts for Access to Space Woodrow Whitlow, Jr., Richard A. Blech, and Isaiah M. Blankson Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio I i :::::J October 2001 The NASA STI Program Office ... in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected the advancement of aeronautics and space papers from scientific and technical science. The NASA Scientific and Technical conferences, symposia, seminars, or other Information (STI) Program Office plays a key part meetings sponsored or cosponsored by in helping NASA maintain this important role. NASA The NASA STI Program Office is operated by • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, Langley Research Center, the Lead Center for technical, or historical information from NASA's scientific and technical information. The NASA programs, projects, and missions, NASA STI Program Office provides access to the often concerned with subjects having NASA STI Database, the largest collection of substantial public interest. aeronautical and space science STI in the world. The Program Office is also NASA's institutional • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English­ mechanism for disseminating the results of its language translations of foreign scientific research and development activities. These results and technical material pertinent to NASA's are published by NASA in the NASA STI Report mission. Series, which includes the following report types: Specialized services that complement the STI • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of Program Office's diverse offerings include completed research or a major Significant creating custom thesauri, building customized phase of research that present the results of data bases, organizing and publishing research NASA programs and include extensive data results ..
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Control of a Variable Geometry Turbofan with an Independently Modulated Third Stream
    DESIGN AND CONTROL OF A VARIABLE GEOMETRY TURBOFAN WITH AN INDEPENDENTLY MODULATED THIRD STREAM DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Ronald J. Simmons, M.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2009 Dissertation Committee: Professor Meyer Benzakein, Adviser Professor Richard Bodonyi Approved by Professor Jeffrey Bons Professor Jen-Ping Chen Adviser Professor Nicholas J. Kuprowicz Aerospace Engineering Graduate Program Distribution Statement A: Unlimited Distribution. Cleared for Public Release by AFRL/WS Public Affairs Case Number 88ABW-2009-1697 The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government. ABSTRACT Abstract Emerging 21st century military missions task engines to deliver the fuel efficiency of a high bypass turbofan while retaining the ability to produce the high specific thrust of a low bypass turbofan. This study explores the possibility of satisfying such competing demands by adding a second independently modulated bypass stream to the basic turbofan architecture. This third stream can be used for a variety of purposes including: providing a cool heat sink for dissipating aircraft heat loads, cooling turbine cooling air, and providing a readily available stream of constant pressure ratio air for lift augmentation. Furthermore, by modulating airflow to the second and third streams, it is possible to continuously match the engine‟s airflow demand to the inlet‟s airflow supply thereby reducing spillage and increasing propulsive efficiency. This research begins with a historical perspective of variable cycle engines and shows a logical progression to proposed architectures.
    [Show full text]
  • SAE1307- Aerospace Propulsion UNIT 1
    SCHOOL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEEING SAE1307- Aerospace Propulsion UNIT 1 1: Performance of turbojets, ramjets at high speeds – limitations. Need for supersonic combustion: The renewed interest in high-speed propulsion has led to increased activity in the development of the supersonic combustion ramjet engine for hypersonic flight applications. In this flight regime, the scramjet engine‟s specific thrust exceeds that of other propulsion systems. Use of air breathing propulsion systems like, scramjets from takeoff to the edges of the atmosphere has the potential to reduce costs of space launch considerably. The hypersonic flight regime is commonly considered to begin when velocities exceed Mach 6 Defence applications of scramjets in missiles is also very sought after due to the very short reaction times associated with high speed of the missile system Subsonic combustion, which technologically is easier to manage with the current knowledge, would be associated, in the hypersonic regime, with high stagnation temperatures that would lead to unacceptable dissociation levels, and hence an inability to materialize the energy rise expected through chemical reactions Combined cycle engines: No single-engine cycle exists that can efficiently cover the whole range of a flight from takeoff to orbit insertion; therefore combined cycles are of particular interest for the design of the scramjet cycle Limitations of Turbojets/Turbofans and Ramjets at High Speeds: Performance based differences between the different engine cycles are clearly illustrated in the fuel specific impulse, Specific impulse vs Mach number diagram shown. = Fig:1.1 Mach 3 flight regime The diagram shows that around Mach 3 flight regime the subsonic combustion ramjet becomes more efficient as a propulsive system in comparison with the turbine-based engines (turbojets of turbofans).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to High Speed Airbreathing Propulsion Systems
    Introduction to High Speed Airbreathing Propulsion Systems MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems • Oxidizer … “liquid air” Have to take our own along So that the engine can breathe At high altitudes • How Much Oxidizer? … depending op chosen propellants … 4-9 times as much As the fuel we carry! MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Flight Without Oxidizer, I What if we could get enough oxygen from ambient air? X-43 airbreathing SCRAMjet engine What happens to our Isp? OK .. Lets loose the Oxidizer … and our Isp goes up by a factor Of 7! … but where do we the the Oxidizer for combustion? …. MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems … from the atmosphere MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Flight Without Oxidizer, II Do Not Need Oxidizer here For a large portion of the Launch trajectory there is Plenty Enough air For combustion if you are going fast enough Need Oxidizer here MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Fuel Efficiencies of Various High Speed Propulsion Systems Isp Minimal turbo-machinery MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Operational Flight Envelope for Various Flight Vehicles MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Operations Payoffs for Airbreathing Launch • Decreased gross lift-off weight, resulting in smaller facilities and easier handling • Wider range of emergency landing sites for intact abort • Powered flyback/go-around & more margin at reduced power • Self-ferry & taxi capabilities • Greatly expanded launch windows (double or triple) • Rapid orbital rendezvous (up to three times faster than rockets) • Wider array of landing sites from orbit, with 2,000-mile cross range and increased range • Reduced sensitivity to weight growth MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Applications MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Amount of Rocket propellant required to launch a 1000 kg payload into orbit Titan IV Our total launch mass goes from space shuttle Rockets10,000 on kg/kg the Launch down Pad to are <1400 Mostly ALLkg/kg FUEL!! wow! Amount of Propellant required, kg "Venture-star" MAE 5540 - Propulsion Systems Specific Impulse, sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Airbreathing Propulsion Systems
    Introduction to airbreathing propulsion systems Integrated project: AIAA aircraft design competition 1er master Aerospace 2020 Koen Hillewaert, Université de Liège Design of Turbomachines, A&M [email protected] Remy Princivalle, Principal Engineer, Safran Aero Boosters [email protected] 1. Balances, thrust and performance Drag / thrust definition 1. Balances, thrust and performance Airbreathing engines: acceleration of (clean) air mass flow ● Thrust = acceleration force of engine mass flow from flight vf to jet velocity vj ● Powers – Propulsive power → airplane acceleration : – Mechanical power → fluid acceleration : – Lost power ● Propulsive efficiency: ● Increasing propulsive efficiency for constant thrust – increase mass flow, decrease jet velocity – Ingest flow at speed lower than flight speed 1. Balances, thrust and performance Airbreathing engines: Boundary Layer Ingestion ● ● 1. Balances, thrust and performance Airbreathing engines: classical performance parameters ● Thermal energy ! = mf Δhf – Fuel mass flow rate: – Fuel to air ratio: – Fuel lower heating value: ● "verall efficiency propulsive power Pp versus thermal energy ! – Propulsive efficiency: – Thermal efficiency: ● Efficiency $ Thrust specific fuel consumption (TSFC) ● Compacity $ Specific thrust 2. Jet engines Generation of high” speed "et through e#pansion over no%%le Snecma/'' (lympus 593 Afterburning ,urbo"et -./ Leap -i$il ,urbofan Snecma /88 Afterburning Turbofan 2. Jet engines Generation of high” speed "et through e#pansion over no%%le ● Ingestion of ma air at flight speed in nacelle – Ram effect: increased total T and p due to relative Mach num!er Mf ● Increase total pressure and temperature – Mechanical : fan – Thermal : gas generator " #rayton – $fter!urning ● #(pansion over e(haust noz)le to ambient pressure – %ho&ed – $dapted 2. Jet engines -ore flow: Brayton thermodynamic cycle ● Thermodynamic cycle – $dia!atic compression ' → ( : – %om!ustion ( → ) : – $dia!atic e*pansion )+, : 2.
    [Show full text]